throbber

`
`SEVENTEENTH EDITION
`I
`THE
`
`MERCK
`
`MANUAL
`
`OF
`
`DIAGNOSIS AND THERAPY
`
`MARK H. BEERS, M.D., and ROBERT BERKOW, M.D.
`
`Editors
`
`Senior Assistant Editors
`ROBERT M. BOGlN, M.D., and
`ANDREW]. FLETCHER, M.B., B.Chir.
`
`Editorial Board
`
`Philip K. Bondy, M.D.
`Preston V. Dilts, Jr., MD.
`Douglas A. Drossman, M.D.
`L. Jack Faling, M.D.
`Eugene P. Frenkel, M.D.
`Glen 0. Gabbard, MD.
`Robert A. Hoeckelman, M.D.
`Gerald L. Mandell, M.D.
`Fred Plum, M.D.
`G. Victor Rossi, Ph.D.
`Paul H. Tanser, M.D., F.R.C.P.(C)
`
`Published by MERCK RESEARCH LABORATORIES
`Division of MERCK & C0,, lNC.
`Whitehouse Station, NJ.
`
`1999
`
`|PR2018—00685
`
`Celgene Ex. 2001, Page 1
`
`IPR2018-00685
`Celgene Ex. 2001, Page 1
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`
`
`CHAPTER 139 - LYMPHOMAS / 955
`
`stimulating factor, granulocyte-macrophage
`colony-stimulating factor) increase neutro-
`phil counts, and erythropoietin increases
`RBC production in 20 to 25% of cases, but
`
`survival advantage has not been shown. Re-
`sponse of MDS to AML chemotherapy is sim—
`ilar to that of AML, after age and karyotype
`are considered.
`
`139 / LYMPHOMAS
`A heterogeneous group of neoplasms arising in the reticutoen—
`dothetiat and lymphatic systems.
`
`The major types are Hodgkin‘s disease and
`non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. An uncommon
`type is mycosis fungoides.
`
`HODGKIN’S DISEASE
`Localized or disseminated malignant pro-
`liferation of tumor cells arisingfrom the
`lymphoreticular system, primarily in-
`volving lymph node tissue and the bone
`marrow.
`
`Incidence and Etiology
`In the USA, 6000 to 7000 new cases are
`diagnosed annually. The malezfemale ratio is
`1.4:1. Hodgkin’s disease is rare before age 10
`and has a bimodal age distribution that peaks
`at ages 15 to 34 andafter age 60. However,
`the second peak may be an artifact of inac—
`curate pathologic diagnosis, because most
`Cases diagnosed after age 60 are inter-
`mediate—grade non-Hodgkin’s lymphomas
`(NHL—see below). Epidemiologic studies
`find no evidence of horizontal spread. The
`
`cause is unknown, but patients with Ilodg—
`kin’s disease appear to have a genetic sus-
`ceptibility (as demonstrated in twin studies)
`and environmental associations (eg, occu-
`pation, such as woodworkers; Epstein-Barr
`Virus infection; HIV infection).
`
`Pathology
`Diagnosis depends on identification of
`Reedeternberg cells
`(large, binucleated
`cells) in lymph nodes or other sites. The back-
`ground cellular infiltrate is heterogeneous
`and consists of histiocytes,
`lymphocytes,
`monocytes, plasma cells, and eosinophils.
`Hodgkin’s disease has four histopathologic
`subtypes (see TABLE 139—1).
`Reed-Sternberg cells are usually CD15+
`and CD30‘r on immunophenotyping. Lym-
`phocyte—predominant Hodgkin’s disease
`may be confused with T—cell—rich B—cell
`NHL; nodular sclerosis, mixed cellularity,
`and lymphocyte-depleted Hodgkin’s disease
`may be confused with Ki-l anaplastic large
`cell NHL.
`
`R TABLE 139—l .
`\Type
`
`HISTOI’ATHOLOGIC SUBTYPES OF HODGKIN'S DISEASE
`
`Appearance
`
`Incidence
`
`Progression
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`LymDhocy’te-
`Predominant
`NOduLar
`Sclerosis
`
`Few Reed-Stemberg Cells and
`many lymphocytes
`Dense fibrous tissue*
`surrounds nodules of
`Hodgkin’s tissue
`
`A moderate number of Reed-
`Stemberg cells with a
`mixed background infiltrate
`
`Numerous Reed—Sternberg
`cells and extensive fibrosis
`
`3%
`
`Relatively slow or indolent
`
`67%
`
`25%
`
`Intermediate or moderately
`progressive; relatively slow
`or indolent (occasionally)
`Intermediate or moderately
`progressive; aggressive
`
`5%
`
`Aggressive
`
`
`Mixed
`
`Cellularity
`
`LymDhocyte-
`
`depleted
`*ShOWs characteristic birefringence with polarized light.
`
`
`
`|PR2018—00685
`
`Celgene Ex. 2001, Page 2
`
`IPR2018-00685
`Celgene Ex. 2001, Page 2
`
`

`

`956 /
`
`SECTION I] — HEMATOLOGY AND ONCOLOGY
`
`Symptoms and Signs
`Symptoms and signs primarily relate to
`the site, amount, and extent of nodal mass
`involvement. Most patients present with cer-
`vical and mediastinal adenopathy and with—
`out systemic complaints. Other manifesta-
`tions develop as the disease spreads through
`the reticuloendothelial system, generally
`among contiguous sites. The rate of progres-
`sion varies according to histopathologic sub—
`type (see TABLE 139—1). Intense pruritus may
`occur early; fever, night sweats, and weight
`loss are frequent when internal nodes (bulky
`mediastinal or
`retroperitoneal), viscera
`(liver), or bone marrow is involved. Pel—Eb-
`stein fever (a few days of high fever regularly
`alternating with a few days to several weeks
`of normal or subnormal temperature) occa-
`sionally occurs. Although the mechanism is
`unclear, immediate pain may occur in dis—
`eased areas after drinking alcoholic bever-
`ages, providing an early clue to diagnosis.
`Bone involvement is often asymptomatic
`but may produce pain with vertebral osteo-
`blastic lesions
`(“ivory” vertebrae) and,
`rarely, osteolytic lesions and compression
`fracture. Pancytopenia
`is
`occasionally
`caused by bone marrow invasion, usually by
`the lymphocyte—depleted type. Epidural in-
`vasion that compresses the spinal cord may
`result in paraplegia. Homer’s syndrome and
`laryngeal paralysis may ' result when en-
`larged lymph nodes compress the cervical
`sympathetic and recurrent laryngeal nerves,
`respectively. Neuralgic pain follows nerve
`root compression. Intracranial, gastric, and
`cutaneous lesions occur rarely and, if pres-
`ent, suggest HIV-associated Hodgkin’s dis—
`ease.
`
`Intrahepatic or extrahepatic bile duct ob-
`struction by tumor masses produces jaun-
`dice. Leg edema may follow lymphatic
`obstruction in the pelvis or groin. Tracheo-
`bronchial compression can cause severe
`dyspnea and wheezing. Infiltration of lung
`parenchyma may simulate lobar consolida-
`tion or bronchopneumonia and may result in
`cavitation or lung abscess.
`Most patients have a slowly progressive
`defect in delayed or cell-mediated immunity
`(T—cell function) that contributes in ad—
`vanced disease to common bacterial and un-
`usual fungal, viral, and protozoa] infections
`(see in Ch. 151). Humoral immunity (anti-
`body production) or B-cell function also is
`depressed in advanced disease. Cachexia is
`
`common, and patients frequently die of sep-
`sis.
`
`Laboratory Findings
`polymorphonuclear
`Slight—to-moderate
`leukocytosis may be present. Lymphocyto-
`penia may occur early and become pro-
`nounced with advanced disease. Eosino-
`phjlia is present in about 20 % ofpatients, and
`thrombocytosis may be observed. Anemia,
`often microcytic, usually develops with ad-
`vanced disease. In advanced anemia, defec.
`tive iron reutilization is characterized by low
`serum iron, low iron—binding capacity, and
`increased bone marrow iron. Hypersplenism
`may appear, but mainly in patients with
`marked splenomegaly. Elevated serum al-
`kaline phosphatase levels usually indicate
`bone marrow or liver involvement or both,
`Increases in leukocyte alkaline phosphatase,
`serum haptoglobin, ESR, serum copper, and
`other acute-phase reactants usually reflect
`active disease.
`
`Diagnosis
`The symptom complex of lymph node en-
`largement (especially cervical) and medias-
`tinal adenopathy, with or without fever,
`night sweats, and weight loss, suggests lym-
`phoma; however, Hodgkin’s disease can be
`definitively diagnosed by lymph node biopsy
`that reveals Reed-Stemberg cells in a char-
`acteristic histologic setting. Hodgkin’s dis-
`ease is very rare-in the absence 'of lymphad-
`enopathy. Biopsy specimens then can be
`obtained from bone marrow, liver, or other
`parenchymal tissue. Monoclonal antibodies
`to certain antigens on Reed—Sternberg cells
`(eg, Leu—Ml [CD15] and CD30 [Ber-HZD are
`important in cases that can be confused with
`NHL.
`Hodgkin’s disease may be difficult to dif-
`ferentiate from lymphadenopathy caused by
`infectious mononucleosis,
`toxoplasmosis,
`cytomegalovirus, NHL, or leukemia. The
`clinical picture can also be simulated by lung
`carcinoma,'sarcoidosis, TB, and various dis-
`eases in whiCh spleno'megaly is the predom-
`inant feature (see Ch. 141).
`
`Staging
`Radiotherapy, chemotherapy, or a combi-
`nation of both is potentially curative, but the
`extent or stage of disease must first be delin-
`eated. The Ann Arbor staging system is com-
`monly used (see TABLE 139—2). The CDTS'
`
`|PR2018—00685
`
`Celgene Ex. 2001, Page 3
`
`IPR2018-00685
`Celgene Ex. 2001, Page 3
`
`

`

`77%
`
`CHAPTER 139 — LYMPHOMAS / 957
`
`TABLE 139—2. ANN ARBOR STAGING OF
`HODGKIN'S DISEASE AND NON-
`
`HODGKIN’S LYMI’HOMA
`Slage*
`Criteria
`
`wold modification of the Ann Arbor stage
`uses X to designate a bulky disease site (>
`1/3 of the chest diameter or > 10 cm in di-
`ameter).
`Noninvasive procedures for staging in-
`clude CT of the thorax, abdomen, and pelvis
`and gallium scanning. Bone scanning and
`MRI are usually not required. Bipedal lymph—
`angiography may be indicated in patients
`with normal abdominal and pelvic CT scans.
`Clinical studies attempting to detect disease
`below the diaphragm may be falsely positive
`or negative in 25 to 33% of patients. Laparot—
`omy (including splenectomy), biopsy of mes-
`enteric and retroperitoneal
`lymph nodes
`(especially those enlarged on CT or lymph—
`angiography), and core biopsy of the bone
`marrow and liver should be considered when
`therapeutic decisions will be significantly af-
`fected. However, staging laparotomy indi-
`cations have been narrowed significantly in
`recent years. Only patients whose clinical
`stage is IIA or less and in whom mantle ra-
`diation is planned may be considered. If the
`patient is to receive chemotherapy, staging
`laparotomy is not needed.
`Treatment
`
`Chemotherapy or radiotherapy regimens
`cure most patients. Nodal disease can be
`eradicated in > 95% of cases with 4 to 4.5
`Wk of 4000 to 4400 cGy within the treated
`field.
`In addition,
`irradiation of adjacent
`regions (extended field) to 3600 cGy is stan-
`dard because the disease spreads by lym-
`phatic contiguity. Patients with subclassifi-
`cation E may also respond to radiotherapy,
`although combined chemotherapy and radio—
`therapy is often recommended. Treatment is
`blased mainly on pathologically staged pa-
`tients, although selected patients may be
`Considered for primary radiotherapy with-
`OUt pathologic staging.
`.Stage I and HA disease can be treated
`Wlth radiotherapy alone to an extended field
`that includes all lymph node—bearing areas
`. abOIVe the diaphragm and, in most cases, the
`Denaomc lymph nodes to the aortic bifur—
`gram“ and spleen or splenic pedicle. Such
`r efitment cures about 80% of patients. Cure
`t1elfers to being disease-free at 5 years post—
`eFaDY. after which relapse is very rare. In
`fiftiems with bulky mediastinal disease, ra-
`mOtherapy alone has a high relapse rate; che—
`motherapy followed by radiotherapy results
`a prolonged relapse-free survival in about
`
`1
`
`2
`
`I
`H
`
`III
`
`In one lymph node only
`In two or more lymph nodes on the
`same side of the diaphragm
`In the lymph nodes, spleen, or both
`and on both sides of the
`diaphragm
`Above the renal vessels (eg, spleen;
`splenic, hilar, celiac, and portal
`nodes)
`In the lower abdomen (periaortic,
`pelvic, or inguinal nodes)
`IV
`Extranodal involvement (eg, bone
`
`marrow, lung, liver)
`*Subclassification E indicates extranodal involve-
`ment adjacent to an involved lymph node (eg, disease
`of mediastinal nodes and hilar adenopathy with ad—
`jacent lung infiltration is classified as stage IIE).
`Stages can be further classified by A to indicate the
`absence or B to indicate the presence of constitu-
`tional symptoms (weight loss, fever, or night sweats).
`B symptoms generally occur with stages III and IV
`(20 to 30% of patients).
`
`75% of patients. For selected patients with
`stage IA disease and nodular sclerosis or
`lymphocyte-predominant histology, mantle
`field radiotherapy alone may suffice.
`For stage IIIAl disease, total nodal ir-
`radiation (mantle and inverted Y) results in
`an overall survival of 85 to 90%, with disease-
`free survival of 65 to 75% at 5 years. In se—
`lected cases (eg, minimal splenic disease
`only), lesser radiotherapy (omission of the
`pelvic field) has been equally effective. How-
`ever, for the majority of patients presenting
`with clinical stages IIB and IIIAl, chemo-
`therapy and radiotherapy are indicated. For
`stage IIIA2 disease, combination chemo—
`therapy is generally used with or without ra-
`diotherapy of bulky nodal sites. Cure rates
`of 75 to 80% have been achieved.
`Because radiotherapy alone does not cure
`stage IIIB disease, combination chemo-
`therapy alone or in conjunction with radio-
`therapy is required. Survival ranges from 70
`to 80 %.
`For stage IVA and B disease, combina-
`tion
`chemotherapy, particularly MOPP
`(mechlorethamine, vincristine, procarba—
`zine, prednisone) or ABVD (doxorubicin,
`
`g—4
`
`|PR2018—00685
`
`Celgene Ex. 2001, Page 4
`
`IPR2018-00685
`Celgene Ex. 2001, Page 4
`
`

`

`958 / SECllON ll - HEMATOLOGY AND ONCOLOGY
`
`1
`
`|
`
`
`
`bleomycin, vinblastine, dacarbazine), has
`produced a complete remission in 70 to 80%
`of patients, with > 50% remaining disease-
`free at 10 to 15 yr. ABVD has become the
`standard regimen for most cases based on
`the results of recent randomized studies. A]-
`ternating MOPP and ABVD or hybrid com-
`binations have not proven superior to ABVD
`in prospective studies. Other effective drugs
`include nitrosoureas, ifosfamide, cisplatin or
`carboplatin, and etoposide. Patients who fail
`to achieve complete remission or who re—
`lapse within 6 to 12 mo have a poor progno—
`sis. Autologous transplantation using bone
`marrow or peripheral cell products has been
`carried out in selected patients; conven—
`tional salvage regimens are generally not cu—
`rative. Autologous transplantation can cure
`up to 50% of patients who are physiologically
`eligible for intensification therapy and re—
`sponsive to salvage induction chemother-
`apy. Allogeneic transplantation has not been
`shown to be superior and is not recom—
`mended. Autologous transplantation is also
`being studied in selected high—risk patients
`at initial diagnosis.
`
`NON-HODGKIN’S
`LYMPHOMAS
`
`Malignant monoclonalproliferation oflym-
`phoid cells in sites ofthe immune system,
`including lymph nodes, bone marrow,
`spleen, liver, and GI tract.
`
`Pathologic classification of non—Hodgkin’s
`lymphomas (NHLs) continues to evolve,
`reflecting new insights into the cells of origin
`and the biologic bases of these heteroge-
`neous diseases. The course of NHL varies
`from indolent and initially well tolerated to
`rapidly fatal. A leukemia-like picture may
`develop in up to 50% of children and about
`20% of adults with some types of NHL.
`
`Incidence and Etiology
`NHL occurs more often than Hodgkin's
`disease. In the USA, about 50,000 new cases
`are diagnosed annually in all age groups, the
`incidence increasing with age. Its cause is
`unknown, although, as with the leukemias,
`substantial experimental evidence suggests
`a viral cause for some lymphomas. For ex-
`ample, the retrovirus human T—cell leukemia-
`lymphoma Virus (HTLV—l) has been isolated
`and appears to be endemic in southern Ja—
`
`pan, the Caribbean, South America, and the
`southeastern USA. The acute illness of adlllt
`T-cell leukemia-lymphoma is characten'zed
`by a fulminating clinical course with Skin
`infiltrates, lymphadenopathy, hepatOSplenQ
`megaly, and leukemia. The leukemic Cells
`are malignant T cells, many with 00,11V01uted
`nuclei. Hypercalcemia often develops, re
`lated to humoral factors rather than to diffict
`bone invasion.
`
`The incidence of NHL, particularly inum,‘
`noblastic and small noncleaved (Burkjws
`lymphoma) cell types, is increased in HIV
`patients. Primary CNS involvement and diS.
`seminated disease have been reported. In
`about 30% of cases, the lymphomas are pre.
`ceded by generalized lymphadenopathy,
`suggesting that polyclonal stimulation of B
`cells precedes lymphomagenesis. C-myc
`gene rearrangements are characteristic of
`some AIDS—associated
`lymphomas. Re-
`sponse to chemotherapy is possible, but tox.
`icity is common and opportunistic infections
`continue to occur, resulting in short survival
`Pathology
`The Working Formulation classifies
`NHL into prognostic categories having ther-
`apeutic implications as follows (NOTE: The
`prognostic designations are based on sur-
`vival data of patients treated before 1980 and
`may not accurately reflect outcomes in pa-
`tients undergoing modern therapy, as dis-
`cussed under Treatment, below):
`
`0 Low-grade lymphomas (38%): diffuse,
`small
`lymphocytic;
`follicular,
`small
`cleaved cell; follicular mixed, small and
`large cell.
`
`' Intermediate-grade lymphomas (40%):
`follicular large cell; diffuse, small cleaved
`cell; diffuse mixed, small and large cell;
`diffuse large cell.
`
`Imrnu—
`' High-grade lymphomas (20%):
`noblastic lymphoma; lymphoblastic lym—
`phoma; small noncleaved cell lymphoma
`(Burkitt’s and non—Burkitt’s type).
`0 Miscellaneous lymphomas (2%): com-
`posite lymphomas, mycosis fungoides,
`true histiocytic, other, and unclassifiable
`types.
`
`A new pathologic classification, the REAL
`(Revised European-American Lymphoma)
`Classification, has recently been introduced
`and is gradually being adopted. This classi—
`fication is valuable for identifying entities
`
`
`
`|PR2018—00685
`
`Celgene Ex. 2001, Page 5
`
`IPR2018-00685
`Celgene Ex. 2001, Page 5
`
`

`

`
`.. 'x
`CHAPTER 139 — LYMPHOMAS / 959
`II
`
`I ll l L.
`
`---..._-L
`
`|PR2018—00685
`
`Celgene Ex. 2001, Page 6
`
`not recognized in the Working Formulation
`and has special strengths by incorporating
`immunophenotype, genotype, and cytoge—
`netics into the diagnostic categories. Among
`the most important new lymphomas are mu—
`cosa-associated lymphoid tumors (MALT—
`see Ch. 23); mantle cell lymphoma, a poor
`prognosis disease previously categorized as
`diffuse small cleaved cell lymphoma; and
`anaplastic large cell lymphoma (Ki-1 lym-
`phoma).
`Immunophenotyping, using fixed or fresh
`tumor tissue, reveals that 80 to 85% of NHLs
`arise from B cells, 15% from T cells, and <
`5% from true histiocytes (monocyte-macro—
`phages) or undefined null cells. Further—
`more, immunologic studies have shown that
`lymphomas arise from different stages of
`normal lymphoid activation and differentia-
`tion. However, except in certain T—cell lym—
`phomas, immunologic classification has not
`yet played a major role in treatment strategy.
`
`Symptoms and Signs
`Although various clinical manifestations
`exist, many patients present with asymp-
`tomatic peripheral
`lymphadenopathy. En-
`larged lymph nodes are rubbery and discrete
`and later become matted. Local disease is
`apparent in some patients, but most have
`multiple areas of involvement. Waldeyer's
`ring (especially the tonsils) is an occasional
`site of disease. Mediastinal and retroperito-
`neal lymphadenopathy may cause pressure
`symptoms on various organs. Extranodal
`sites may dominate the clinical picture (eg,
`gastric involvement can simulate GI carci-
`noma; intestinal lymphomamay cause a mal—
`absorption syndrome). The skin and bones
`are initially involved in 15% of patients with
`diffuse large cell lymphoma and in 7% with
`diffuse, small lymphocytic lymphoma. About
`33% of patients with extensive abdominal or
`thoracic disease develop chylous ascites or
`pleural effusion (see Ch. 80), respectively,
`owing to lymphatic obstruction. Weight loss,
`fever, night sweats, and asthenia indicate
`disseminated disease.
`Two problems are common in NHL, but
`rare in Hodgkin’s disease: (1) Congestion
`and edema of the face and neck can result
`from pressure on the superior vena cava (su—
`periorvenacavaor superiormediastinalsyn—
`drome), and (2) ureteral compression from
`pelvic lymph nodes may interfere with uri-
`nary flow and cause secondary renal failure.
`
`Anemia is initially present in about 33% of
`patients and eventually develops in most. It
`may be caused by bleeding from GI involve-
`ment or low platelet levels, hemolysis from
`hypersplenism or Coombs’—positive hemo-
`lytic anemia, bone marrow infiltration from
`lymphoma, or marrow suppression from
`chemotherapy or radiotherapy. A leukemic
`phase develops in 20 to 40% of lymphocytic
`lymphomas and rarely in intermediate-grade
`lymphomas. High—grade lymphomas may fre-
`quently be leukemic. Hypogammaglobulin—
`emia caused by a progressive decrease in
`immunoglobulin production occurs in 15%
`of patients and may predispose to serious
`bacterial infection.
`Ki-l anaplastic large cell lymphoma, a
`subset of intermediate—grade (diffuse large
`cell)
`lymphoma affecting children and
`adults, was recently codified by the Ki—l
`(CD30) antigen on the malignant cells. CD30
`is also seen on Reed-Sternberg cells,
`whereas CD15 is limited to Hodgkin’s dis-
`ease. The lymphoma is heterogeneous; im-
`munophenotyping shows that 75% of cases
`are of T—cell origin, 15% are of B-cell origin,
`and 10% are unclassified. Patients have rap-
`idly progressive skin lesions, adenopathy,
`and visceral lesions. It may be mistaken for
`Hodgkin’s disease or metastatic undifferen-
`tiated carcinoma.
`In children, NHL may be of the small non-
`cleaved cell (Burkitt’s lymphoma), diffuse
`large cell, or lymphoblastic type. Childhood
`lymphomas present special problems (eg, G1
`or meningeal involvement) and are managed
`differently than adult lymphomas. The lym-
`phoblastic type represents a variation of
`acute lymphoblastic leukemia (T—cell type)
`because both have a predilection for mar-
`row, peripheral blood, skin, and CNS in-
`volvement; patients often present with me
`diastinal adenopathy and superior vena cava
`syndrome. Follicular lymphomas rarely oc-
`cur in children.
`
`Diagnosis
`NHL must be differentiated from Hodg-
`kin’s disease, acute and chronic leukemia,
`metastatic carcinoma, infectious mononu
`cleosis, TB (especially primary TB with hilar
`adenopathy), and other causes of lymphad
`enopathy,
`including
`pseudolymphoma
`caused by phenytoin. Diagnosis can be made
`only by histologic study of excised tissue.
`Destruction of normal lymph node architec
`
`IPR2018-00685
`Celgene Ex. 2001, Page 6
`
`

`

`960 / SECI'lON 11 — HEMATOLOGY AND ONCOLOGY
`
`ture and invasion ofthe capsule and adjacent
`fat by characteristic neoplastic cells are the
`usual histologic criteria. Immunophenotyp-
`ing studies to determine the cell of origin will
`identify specific subtypes and help define
`prognosis and may aid in management deci—
`sions (see below). Demonstration of the leu-
`kocyte common antigen CD45 by immuno-
`peroxidase rules out metastatic carcinoma,
`which is often in the differential diagnosis of
`“undifferentiated” malignancies. The test for
`leukocyte common antigen can be done on
`fixed tissues. Most surface marker studies
`can also be done on fixed tissue with immu—
`noperoxidase methods. Gene rearrange—
`ment (to document B—cell or T-cell clonality)
`and cytogenetics require fresh tissue.
`
`Staging
`
`Localized NHL does occur, but the disease
`is disseminated in about 90% of follicular
`lymphomas and 70% of diffuse lymphomas
`when first recognized. Clinical staging pro-
`cedures similar to those for Hodgkin’s dis-
`ease (see above) are indicated, except that
`laparotomy and splenectomy are rarely re—
`quired. CT of the abdomen and pelvis may
`reveal para-aortic as well as mesenteric dis—
`ease sites. The final staging of NHL (see
`TABLE 139—2) is similar to that of Hodgkin’s
`disease; however, it is more often based on
`clinical than pathologic findings.
`Initially, constitutional symptoms tend to
`be less common in NHL than in Hodgkin’s
`disease and do not usually alter prognosis.
`
`Organ infiltration is more Widespread, and
`the bone marrow and peripheral blood “lay
`be involved. Bone marrow biopsy to deter‘
`mine marrow involvement should be done in
`all patients when it will change the manage~
`ment recommendation (eg, selecting radia.
`tion alone for
`localized low—grade lym.
`phoma, considering intrathecal therapy for
`intermediate—grade lymphoma, determining
`the International Prognostic Index [IPI]).
`Prognosis and Treatment
`
`The histopathology, stage of disease, and
`(in some reports) results of surface marker
`studies significantly influence the prognosis
`and response to treatment. Patients with T.
`cell lymphomas generally have a worse prog-
`nosis than those with B-cell types, although
`results of recent intensive treatment pro-
`grams may lessen this difference. Other fac—
`tors that adversely affect prognosis are poor
`performance status, age > 60 yr, elevated
`LDH level, bulky tumor masses (diameter >
`10 cm), and more than two extranodal sites
`of disease.
`
`Recently, a prognostic index for diffuse
`mixed, diffuse large cell, and imrnunoblastic
`lymphomas has been reported. The IPI con-
`siders five categories: age, performance
`status, LDH level, number of extranodal
`sites, and stage. Prognostic groups of low,
`low intermediate, high intermediate, and
`high risk may be defined (see TABLE 139—3).
`The IPI is also being studiedin low-grade and
`high-grade lymphomas.
`
`TABLE 139-3. OUTCOME ACCORDING TO RISK GROUP AS DEFINED
`BY THE INTERNATIONAL PROGNOSTIC INDEX
`2-Yr
`5-Yr
`Relapse-
`Relapse-
`5-Yr
`2-Yr
`Free
`Free
`Complete
`Bisk
`Survival
`Survival
`Survival
`Survival
`Palienls” Response
`Factors
`Risk
`
`
`
`
`
`
`(n) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%)Group (%)\
`
`Low
`0 or 1
`35
`87
`79
`70
`84
`73
`Low—
`2
`27
`67
`66
`50
`66
`51
`Intermediate
`
`High—
`Intermediate
`
`3
`
`22
`
`55
`
`59
`
`49
`
`54
`
`43
`
`4 or 5 16 44 58 40 34High 26
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`*Patients total 2031, including 1385 in the training sample and 646 in the validation sample.
`Adapted from The International Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma Prognostic Factors Project: “A predictive model
`for aggressive non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma.” N Engl J Med 329(14):987—994, 1997.
`
`|PR2018—00685
`
`Celgene Ex. 2001, Page 7
`
`IPR2018-00685
`Celgene Ex. 2001, Page 7
`
`

`

`Treatment oflocalized disease (stages
`I and II): In low-grade lymphomas, pa-
`tients rarely present with localized disease,
`but when they do, regional radiotherapy may
`offer long—term control. However, relapses
`may occur > 10 yr after radiotherapy.
`About 1/2 of patients with intermediate-
`grade lymphomas present with localized
`disease. These patients must receive com—
`bination chemotherapy and regional irradi-
`ation, which is usually curative.
`Patients with high-grade lymphomas,
`lyrnphoblastic lymphomas, or small non-
`cleaved cell
`lymphomas
`(Burkitt's lym—
`phoma), even if apparently localized, must
`receive intensive combination chemother—
`apy with meningeal prophylaxis. Treatment
`may require maintenance chemotherapy
`(lyrnphoblastic), but cure is expected.
`Treatment
`of
`advanced
`disease
`(stages III and IV): Treatment varies con—
`siderably in patients with low-grade or in-
`dolent lymphomas. A watch—and—wait ap-
`proach, treatment with a single alkylating
`drug, or two-drug and three-drug regimens
`may be used. Interferon and other biologic
`response modifiers may be of benefitin some
`cases. Recent reports of radiolabeled-anti-
`body therapy also appear promising. Al-
`though survival may be prolonged in terms
`of years, late relapse occurs, resulting in an
`unfavorable long-term prognosis.
`In patients with intermediate-grade
`lymphomas, the drug combination CHOP
`(cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincris-
`tine, prednisone) is standard. Complete re-
`gression of disease in 50 to 70% of patients
`is expected, depending on the IPI category.
`About 70% of complete responders are
`Cured, and relapses after 2 yr off treatment
`are rare.
`using
`regimens
`New chemotherapy
`growth factor support are under study. Pre-
`liminary data suggest that these high-dose
`regimens may be superior to CHOP. An in-
`tensive alternating regimen for small non-
`cleaved cell (Burkitt’s) lymphoma, CODOX—
`M/IVAC (cyclophosphamide, vincristine,
`doxorubicin, methotrexate, ifosfamide, eto—
`Doside, cytarabine), has been reported to re-
`Sult in a cure rate of > 90% for children and
`adults.
`Patients with T-cell lymphoblastic lym-
`Dhoma are managed in a similar fashion to
`Phose with acute childhood T—cell leukemia,
`19, with intensive chemotherapy regimens,
`
`*
`
`CHAPTER 139 — LYMPHOMAS / 961
`
`including prophylactic treatment of the CNS.
`Results are encouraging, with a cure rate of
`at least 50%.
`Treatment of relapse: The first relapse
`after initial chemotherapy is almost always
`treated with stem cell transplantation. Pa—
`tients must be physiologically s 65 yr and
`have responsive disease, good performance
`status, and a source of uncontaminated and
`adequate number CD344 stem cells. Tumor
`response is usually assessed with a second-
`line salvage chemotherapy regimen. Stem
`cells are harvested from peripheral blood or
`bone marrow. The stem cell product may be
`purged (cleared of tumor cells by in vitro
`methods) or positively selected (collecting
`CD34+ cells), and soon the stem cell pool
`may be expanded in vitro. Consolidation
`myeloablative therapy may include chemo-
`therapy with or without whole-body irradi-
`ation. Posttreatment immunotherapy (eg, in-
`terferon, IL-2) is being studied.
`Autologous
`transplantation (stem
`cells from the self) is recommended as sal-
`vage therapy for all eligible patients with
`chemosensitive relapse. If an HLA—compati—
`ble donor is available, allogeneic (stem cells
`from a related donor) transplantation may
`be considered for those with high—grade lym-
`phomas, bone marrow orblood involvement,
`or low-grade lymphomas. The allotransplant
`stem cell product is free of contaminating
`tumor cells and may provide a theoretically
`beneficial graft-vs.-lymphoma effect. These
`advantages must be balanced by the signifi-
`cantly increased risks of the allotransplant
`procedure.
`A cure may be expected in 30 to 50% of
`eligible patients with intermediate— and high-
`grade lymphomas undergoing myeloablative
`therapy. In low-grade lymphomas, it remains
`uncertain whether cure may be obtained
`with transplantation, although survival is su-
`perior to secondary palliative therapy alone.
`The mortality rate of myeloablative trans-
`plantation has decreased dramatically to 2
`to 5% for most autologous procedures and
`< 15% for most allogeneic procedures.
`A new area of investigation is the role of
`autologous transplantation as first treatment
`at initial diagnosis. Using the IPI, high-risk
`patients may be identified and selected for
`dose intensification. Preliminary data sug-
`gest an increased rate of cure.
`A late sequela of standard and high-dose
`chemotherapy is the occurrence of second
`
`.1
`
`|PR2018—00685
`
`Celgene Ex. 2001, Page 8
`
`IPR2018-00685
`Celgene Ex. 2001, Page 8
`
`

`

`962 / SECI'lON ll — HEMATOLOGY AND ONCOLOGY
`
`a
`
`neoplasms, especially myelodysplasias and
`acute myelogenous leukemia. Chemother-
`apy combined with radiotherapy increases
`this risk, although its incidence is still only
`about 3%. A special late event in young
`women with Hodgkin’s disease treated with
`radiotherapy is an increased incidence of
`breast cancer.
`
`BURKITI’S LYMPHOMA
`
`(Small Noncleaved Cell Lymphoma)
`Although rare in the USA, Burkitt’s lym—
`phoma is endemic in Central Africa. It may
`present in childhood as a rapidly enlarging
`jaw or ovarian mass. More frequently, it ap—
`pears as bulky abdominal disease, often aris»
`ing in the region of the ileocecal valve. In
`adults, it may be bulky and generalized, often
`with massive involvement of liver, spleen,
`and bone marrow. CSF and brain disease are
`often found at diagnosis or with relapsing
`lymphoma.
`The pathology reveals a high mitotic rate
`and a starry sky pattern of rapidly prolifer-
`ating malignant lymphocytes. The disease is
`closely associated with Epstein—Barr virus
`(EBV) in the endemic lymphoma; however,
`it is uncertain whether EBV plays an etio-
`logic role. Burkitt's lymphoma has charac-
`teristic cytogenetics, usually t(8;l4), involv-
`ing the C-myc oncogene. Staging includes CT
`of the torso, bone marrow biopsy, CSF cy—
`tology, and gallium scanning.
`Treatment must be initiated urgently and
`staging studies expedited because of rapid
`tumor growth. With treatment, tumor lysis
`syndrome may be a complication of rapid
`cell death. A high LDH level predicts for this
`complication, and patients must receive hy-
`dration, allopurinol, alkalinization and atten—
`tion to electrolytes (to prevent or treat hy—
`perkalemia), possible uric acid nephropathy,
`and acute renal dysfunction, hypocalcemia,
`and hyperphosphatemia. High-dose, short—
`course combination chemotherapy may be
`highly curative (> 75%). Meningeal prophy-
`laxis is essential. Occasionally, the disease
`
`is completely resected prior to chemother.
`apy, but aggressive therapy is still indicated,
`
`MYCOSIS PUNGOIDES
`An uncommon chronic T—cell Lymphoma
`primarily affecting the skin and 0000,
`sionally the internal organs.
`Mycosis fungoides is rare compared with
`Hodgkin’s disease and non-Hodgkin’s lym.
`phoma (NHL) and, unlike most other lym.
`phomas, is insidious in onset. It may appear
`as a chronic, pruritic rash that is difficult to
`diagnose. Initially plaquelike, it may spread
`to involve most of the skin, become nodular,
`and eventually become systemic. Lesions
`may become ulcerated. Pathologic diagnosis
`is delayed because sufficient quantities of
`lymphoma cells appear in the skin lesions‘
`very gradually. Immunophenotyping studies
`show that the malignant cells are mature T
`cells (T4 +, T11 +, T12 Jr). Characteristic Pau—
`trier’s microabscesses are present in the epi—
`dermis. Most patients are > 50 yr at

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket