throbber

`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`THALIDOMIDE FOR THE TREATMENT OF ORAL APHTHOUS ULCERS IN PATIENTS WITH HIV INFECTION
`
`THALIDOMIDE FOR THE TREATMENT OF ORAL APHTHOUS ULCERS
`IN PATIENTS WITH HUMAN IMMUNODEFICIENCY VIRUS INFECTION
`
`N
`
`G
`
`.D.,
`, S
` S
`.D., J
`, B.D.S., P
` S. G
`, M.D., J
` M. J
`J
`C
`PRITZLER
`OHN
`H
`REENSPAN
`OHN
`ACOBSON
`EFFREY
`.D.,
` K
`, M.D., J
` L. F
`, M.D., J. B
` J
`, M.D., L
` F
`, M.D., P
`ACKSON
`ROOKS
`AHEY
`OHN
`ZEERA
`ETTER
`AWRENCE
`OX
`H
`M
` C
`, P
`.D., A
` W. W
`, M.D., M.P.H., L
` A. M
`P
`, D.M.D., P
`.D.,
`IRIAM
`HERNOFF
`H
`LBERT
`U
`AURIE
`AC
`HAIL
`H
` J. V
`, M.D.,
` D
` A. W
`, M.D.,
`
` N
` I
`
` A
`UILLERMO
`ASQUEZ
`AND
`AVID
`OHL
`FOR
`THE
`ATIONAL
`NSTITUTE
`OF
`LLERGY
` I
` D
` AIDS C
` T
` G
`*
`AND
`NFECTIOUS
`ISEASES
`LINICAL
`RIALS
`ROUP
`
`
`
`A
`BSTRACT
`Background
`In patients with advanced human
`immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection, aphthous ul-
`ceration of the mouth and oropharynx can become
`extensive and debilitating. Preliminary reports sug-
`gest that thalidomide may promote the healing of
`oral aphthous ulcers.
`Methods
`We performed a double-blind, random-
`ized, placebo-controlled study of thalidomide as
`therapy for oral aphthous ulcers in HIV-infected pa-
`tients. The patients received a four-week course of
`either 200 mg of thalidomide or placebo orally once
`per day. They were evaluated weekly for the condi-
`tion of the ulcers, their quality of life, and evidence
`of toxicity. Assays were performed for plasma tumor
`necrosis factor
`(TNF-
`), soluble TNF-
` receptors,
`a
`a
`a
`and HIV RNA.
`Results
`Sixteen of 29 patients in the thalidomide
`group (55 percent) had complete healing of their
`aphthous ulcers after four weeks, as compared with
`only 2 of 28 patients in the placebo group (7 per-
`cent; odds ratio, 15; 95 percent confidence interval
`after adjustment for group sequential testing, 1.8 to
`⬍
`499; unadjusted P
`0.001). Pain diminished and the
`ability to eat improved with thalidomide treatment.
`The adverse effects noted with thalidomide included
`somnolence and rash (7 patients each), and 6 of the
`29 patients discontinued treatment because of toxic-
`ity. Thalidomide treatment increased HIV RNA levels
`(median increase, 0.42 log
` copies per milliliter; in-
`10
`⫽
`0.04). With thalido-
`crease with placebo, 0.05; P
`mide treatment there were unexpected increases in
` and soluble
`the plasma concentrations of TNF-
`a
`TNF-
` receptors.
`a
`Conclusions
`Thalidomide is an effective treat-
`ment for aphthous ulceration of the mouth and
`oropharynx in patients with HIV infection. (N Engl J
`Med 1997;336:1487-93.)
`©1997, Massachusetts Medical Society.
`
`A
`
`PHTHOUS ulceration of the mouth,
`though painful and annoying, is usually a
`self-limited problem in immunocompe-
`tent persons.
` In patients with human
`1
`immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection, however,
`aphthous ulcers frequently become progressive, de-
` Extremely painful, en-
`structive, and debilitating.
`1-4
`larging necrotic lesions can develop, resembling the
`large aphthous ulcers often seen in patients with Beh-
`çet’s syndrome. The hypopharynx and esophagus may
`
`be involved. Aphthous ulcers can interfere with eat-
`ing and lead to malnutrition and wasting. Even when
`the ulcers regress, they tend to recur.
`Available treatments for aphthous ulcers in HIV-
`infected patients are unsatisfactory. Some success
`has been reported with topical, intralesional, and
`systemic corticosteroids, but the responses are not
`uniform and the relapse rate is high.
` No controlled
`2
`studies of this treatment have been performed, and
`long-term treatment with systemic corticosteroids
`may cause further immunosuppression in already im-
`munocompromised patients.
`Several groups have suggested that thalidomide,
`-N
`-phthalimidoglutarimide, is effective for the se-
`
`a
`vere forms of aphthous ulceration in HIV-infected
`and other patients.
` As part of AIDS Clinical Trials
`3-15
`Group (ACTG) protocol 251 of the National Insti-
`tute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), we
`performed a multicenter, double-blind, randomized,
`placebo-controlled study of the usefulness of thalid-
`omide in treating oral aphthous ulcers in HIV-
`infected persons. In addition, since thalidomide has
`been reported to inhibit the production of tumor
`(TNF-
`),
` a substance known to
`necrosis factor
`16-20
`a
`a
`induce the expression of HIV by infected cells,
` we
`21
`also evaluated the activity of the drug against TNF-
`a
`and HIV.
`
`METHODS
`
`Study Population
`We enrolled patients in the study if they met the following cri-
`teria: an age of at least 13 years; documented HIV infection; oral
`aphthous ulceration of at least two weeks’ duration, as confirmed
`by a biopsy that revealed no infectious, neoplastic, or other spe-
`
`From the Departments of Medicine, Bronx Veterans Affairs Medical
`Center and Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York (J M.J.); the De-
`partment of Stomatology, University of California at San Francisco, San
`Francisco (J.S.G., L.A.M.); the Statistical and Data Analysis Center, Har-
`vard School of Public Health, Boston (J.S., M.C.); the Division of AIDS,
`National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Bethesda, Md. (N.K.,
`L.F.); the Department of Medicine, University of California at Los Angeles,
`Los Angeles (J.L F.); the Departments of Pathology (J.B.J.) and Medicine
`(A.W.W.), Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore; the
`Department of Medicine, University of Puerto Rico Medical School, San
`Juan (G.J.V.); and the Department of Medicine, University of North Caro-
`lina, Chapel Hill (D.A.W.). Address reprint requests to Dr. Jacobson at the
`Bronx Veterans Affairs Medical Center, 130 W. Kingsbridge Rd., Bronx,
`NY 10468.
`*Additional investigators who participated in this trial are listed in the
`Appendix.
`
`Volume 336 Number 21
`
`ⴢ
`
`1487
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`IPR2018-00685
`Celgene Ex. 2023, Page 1
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`The New England Journal of Medicine
`
`cific diagnosis; a surface diameter of at least 5 mm for the largest
`ulcer; a negative culture of the ulcer for herpes simplex virus; a
`hemoglobin concentration greater than 8 g per deciliter; an ab-
`solute neutrophil count greater than 500 per cubic millimeter; a
`platelet count greater than 50,000 per cubic millimeter; a serum
`bilirubin concentration no higher than 2.5 times the upper limit
`of normal; serum concentrations of aspartate aminotransferase
`and alkaline phosphatase less than 5 times the upper limit of nor-
`mal; and a serum creatinine concentration of less than 2.5 mg per
`deciliter (221
`mol per liter).
`m
`Patients were excluded from the study if they had bilateral pe-
`ripheral neuropathy more severe than grade 1 or a history of such
`neuropathy, a known allergy to thalidomide, or prior treatment
`of aphthous ulcers with thalidomide; if they were pregnant or lac-
`tating; if they were receiving short-term therapy for opportunistic
`infections; if they were receiving radiation to the head or neck; if
`they had been treated with systemic or oral topical corticosteroids
`within one week before the first set of blood tests; if they were
`treated with other putative immunomodulators within the two
`weeks before entry into the study and during the study; if they
`were undergoing systemic cancer chemotherapy; if they were
`treated with antiinfective mouthwashes; and if they were receiving
`zalcitabine, pentoxifylline, methotrexate, trimetrexate, or antine-
`oplastic alkylating agents. If a patient had received any of the lat-
`ter group of medications within eight weeks before entering the
`study, the patient’s aphthous ulcers had to have persisted for at
`least four weeks after the medication was discontinued. Anti-HIV
`therapy was held constant beginning four weeks before study
`entry. Antimicrobial prophylaxis against opportunistic infections
`was permitted.
`Patients were recruited at 19 sites in the United States. The
`study was approved by the institutional review board of each
`medical center. The patients gave written informed consent to par-
`ticipate. Precautions were taken to prevent and detect pregnancy,
`as described in the Discussion section.
`
`Treatment Regimens
`The patients were randomly assigned to receive a four-week
`course of either two 100-mg capsules of thalidomide or two pla-
`cebo capsules orally once a day at bedtime (the study medications
`were kindly provided by Andrulis Pharmaceuticals, Beltsville,
`Md.). Patients whose aphthous ulcers had not completely healed
`by the end of the four weeks were offered the option of taking
`two 100-mg capsules of open-label thalidomide daily for the next
`four weeks. If the healing was still not complete after that period,
`200 mg of thalidomide could be given twice a day for an addi-
`tional four weeks as tolerated.
`As specified in the study protocol, in the event of sedation or
`other adverse effects, depending on their nature and grade (as de-
`fined according to the NIAID criteria), the dose was reduced, the
`study medication was permanently discontinued, or the medica-
`tion was withheld until the adverse effect had resolved, at which
`point the treatment was resumed at a reduced dose.
`
`Criteria for Response
`One end point of the study was the complete absence of oral
`aphthous ulcers after four weeks of study treatment (a complete
`response). If a patient discontinued the study treatment before
`the end of four weeks because of toxicity, the response was not
`considered complete unless there was complete healing at the
`time of the discontinuation and the complete healing lasted until
`the four-week visit. A partial response at week 4 was defined as a
`decrease of 50 percent or more in the combined surface area of
`the three largest ulcers, as compared with the area of the three
`largest ulcers at base line, with no formation of new ulcers. (The
`surface area was defined as the product of the ulcer’s largest sur-
`face diameter and its largest perpendicular surface diameter.) A
`lack of response was defined as a decrease of less than 50 percent
`or the occurrence of a new ulcer.
`An additional, independent end point was the change in the
`
`1488
`
`ⴢ
`
`May 22, 1997
`
`HIV load, as measured by the plasma HIV RNA level, from base
`line to week 4.
`
`Evaluation of Patients and Follow-up
`After the screening and base-line evaluations, the patients were
`seen weekly by site investigators unaware of the patients’ treat-
`ment status and the results of measurements of TNF-
` and the
`a
`HIV load, in order to assess the healing of oral ulcers and toxic
`effects of the study medication. At base line and at each weekly
`visit, a quality-of-life questionnaire was administered to assess pain
`and eating ability; neuropathy was assessed; and there were labo-
`ratory evaluations of blood cells, serum chemistries, serum thalid-
`omide levels, and hepatic and renal function. Plasma samples for
`the measurement of TNF-
`, soluble TNF-
` receptor type II, and
`a
`a
`HIV RNA were obtained at base line and every two weeks. CD4
`and CD8 lymphocyte counts were performed at base line and
`week 4. A pregnancy test for the
` subunit of human chorionic
`b
`gonadotropin in serum was performed weekly on women with
`childbearing potential and was repeated four weeks after the dis-
`continuation of the study medication.
`
`Quality-of-Life Measurements
`The quality-of-life questionnaire contained 15 items that meas-
`ured general health, pain, and eating ability during the study.
`Two of the items, from the Medical Outcomes Study: HIV,
` as-
`22
`sessed general perceptions of health and pain; they were supple-
`mented by an item assessing the patient’s pain while eating. Two
`scales with six items each assessed discomfort while eating and the
`actual consumption of food (the latter scale was modified from
`the Sickness Impact Profile
`). The responses to these questions
`23
`were scored on scales ranging from 1 to 5 or 1 to 6, with higher
`numbers indicating poorer health or more severe symptoms.
`
`TNF Measurements and Virologic Assays
`The laboratory assays for TNF-
`, soluble TNF-
` receptor type
`a
`a
`II, and HIV-1 RNA were performed at the end of the study. Plas-
`ma levels of TNF-
` were measured with TNF-
` enzyme ampli-
`a
`a
`fied-sensitivity immunoassay kits (Medgenix, Incstar, Stillwater,
`Minn.), and levels of soluble TNF receptor II were measured with
`HyCult enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kits (Caltag, San
`Francisco). The assays were performed in an ACTG Advanced
`Technology Laboratory (University of California at Los Angeles).
`The samples from each patient were batch-tested in a single run.
`For quality control, 15 percent of the samples were retested in a
`subsequent run to confirm the results of the first run.
`HIV-1 RNA levels in plasma collected in acid–citrate–dextrose
`were determined in a single ACTG-certified laboratory by the
`HIV-1 Amplicor Monitor assay (Roche Diagnostics, Branchburg,
`N.J.)
` with the Viral Quality Assurance Program standards of the
`24
`National Institutes of Health. Each patient’s samples were batch-
`tested in a single run with detection on the same microtiter plate
`to minimize variability.
`
`Statistical Analysis and Interim Data Monitoring
`The study was designed to have 80 percent power and type I
`error rates of 0.05 for the independent end points of complete
`ulcer resolution and change in HIV load at week 4. The study
`was not designed for the formal testing of hypotheses about other
`end points; we present those findings for exploratory purposes
`only, without adjusting the type I error rates for multiple testing.
`All the analyses were performed on an intention-to-treat basis, ex-
`cept that three patients who did not begin the study treatment
`were excluded.
`For continuous and ordinal variables, appropriate two-tailed
`Wilcoxon nonparametric rank-sum or signed-rank tests were
`used.
` Two-by-two classifications of ulcer-related and other di-
`25
`chotomous end points were tested by Fisher’s exact test.
` The
`26
`strength of the association between the variables used in the anal-
`ysis was estimated with Spearman’s rank-correlation coefficient.
`25
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`IPR2018-00685
`Celgene Ex. 2023, Page 2
`
`

`

`THALIDOMIDE FOR THE TREATMENT OF ORAL APHTHOUS ULCERS IN PATIENTS WITH HIV INFECTION
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`The distributions of the time to ulcer healing were estimated by
`the Kaplan–Meier product-limit method.
`27
`The study design included a group sequential interim analysis
`of the ulcer-healing end point for the first 45 of 82 intended pa-
`tients, with an O’Brien–Fleming stopping boundary.
` The re-
`28
`sults of the interim analysis were presented to an ad hoc interim-
`review committee. On the basis of these findings, enrollment in
`the placebo group was closed, by which time 12 more patients
`had completed four weeks of randomized study treatment. Re-
`sults for all 57 patients (which were virtually identical to the re-
`sults of the interim analysis) are presented here.
`
`RESULTS
`
`Study Population
`Between February 1994 and October 1995, 60
`patients were enrolled. Three patients were excluded
`from the analysis because they never received treat-
`ment according to the study protocol. The ulcers of
`two of the three patients healed between the time
`of the screening visit and the time the study treat-
`ment was scheduled to begin; the third patient was
`found after randomization to be ineligible for the
`study. Of the 57 patients included in the analysis, 28
`were randomly assigned to receive placebo and 29
`were assigned to receive thalidomide. The patients in
`the two groups had similar base-line characteristics
`(Table 1). Almost all had substantial pain that im-
`paired their eating and overall health. Only one pa-
`tient in each group missed the final study visit at
`week 4.
`
`Clinical Data
`Among the 29 patients in the thalidomide group,
`16 (55 percent) had responded to therapy complete-
`ly at week 4, as compared with 2 of the 28 patients
`in the placebo group (7 percent; odds ratio, 15;
`95 percent confidence interval after adjustment for
`group sequential testing, 1.8 to 499; unadjusted
`P
`0.001) (Fig. 1). For the patients in the thalido-
`⬍
`mide group who had complete responses, the medi-
`an time to complete ulcer healing was 3.5 weeks (95
`percent confidence interval, 2 to 4). Once the pa-
`tients randomly assigned to placebo were offered
`open-label thalidomide after week 4, their rate
`of complete response was similar to the initial rate
`of complete response in the thalidomide group
`(Fig. 2).
`If one combines complete and partial responses,
`the results show a similar pattern. Of the 29 patients
`in the thalidomide group, 26 (90 percent) had com-
`plete or partial responses at the end of week 4, as
`compared with only 7 of 28 patients in the placebo
`group (25 percent; odds ratio, 24; 95 percent con-
`0.001).
`fidence interval, 5.2 to 162; P
`⬍
`Seven patients received the higher dose of thalido-
`mide (200 mg twice a day) because their ulcers were
`still present. Five of these patients had complete
`healing.
`The quality-of-life data showed that the patients
`
`-L
` B
` C
`
`OF 57 HIV-INFECTED
`T
` 1.
`INE
`ASE
`HARACTERISTICS
`ABLE
`PATIENTS WITH APHTHOUS ULCERS TREATED WITH
`THALIDOMIDE OR PLACEBO.*
`
`CHARACTERISTIC
`
`Age — yr
`Weight — kg
`Sex — no. (%)
`Male
`Female
`Race or ethnic group — no. (%)
`Non-Hispanic white
`Non-Hispanic black
`Hispanic
`Asian or Pacific Islander
`American Indian
`CD4 cells
`No./mm3
`Median
`Interquartile range
`Percentage†
`Median
`Interquartile range
`Copies of HIV RNA — ⫻10⫺3/ml‡
`Median
`Interquartile range
`Area of ulcers — mm2
`Mean quality-of-life score§
`
`PLACEBO
`(Nⴝ28)
`
`34.4⫾1.3
`61.9⫾2.1
`
`24 (86)
`4 (14)
`
`10 (36)
`6 (21)
`10 (36)
`2 (7)
`0
`
`27.8
`16.8, 83.5
`
`4.3
`1.8, 8.0
`
`THALIDOMIDE
`(Nⴝ29)
`
`36.2⫾1.5
`66.2⫾3.0
`
`26 (90)
`3 (10)
`
`9 (31)
`7 (24)
`9 (31)
`2 (7)
`2 (7)
`
`17.0
`6.0, 80.0
`
`2.0
`1.0, 8.0
`
`83.3
`37.1, 254.1
`194.3⫾43.5
`3.0⫾0.2
`
`120.6
`67.6, 206.0
`193.6⫾41.5
`3.1⫾0.2
`
`SE.
`*Plus–minus values are means
`⫾
`†Percentages shown are percentages of all lymphocytes.
`‡Data are based on 26 patients in each group.
`§Data are based on 27 patients in the placebo group and 28 patients in
`the thalidomide group.
`
`in the thalidomide group succeeded much more than
`those in the placebo group in attaining a relatively
`problem-free status (responses of
`2 on all meas-
`⭐
`ures [P
`0.03] except general health). The improve-
`⬍
`ment was greatest with regard to the patients’ dis-
`0.001).
`comfort while eating (P
`⬍
`The patients in the thalidomide group gained a
`median of 1.8 kg (4 lb) during the first four weeks
`of the study, whereas there was no weight gain in
`the placebo group (P
`0.07). The study had only
`⫽
`27 percent power to detect a difference of 1.8 kg.
`
`Immunologic Data
`The median plasma levels of TNF-
` and soluble
`a
`TNF-
` receptor type II were elevated in both groups
`a
`before the study treatment began (Table 2). After
`two weeks of treatment, both levels increased signif-
`icantly more in the thalidomide group than in the
`placebo group (Table 2). The increases in plasma
`TNF-
` levels correlated with the increases in levels
`a
`of soluble TNF-
` receptor type II from base line to
`a
`week 2 (r
`0.64, P
`0.001) and from base line to
`⫽
`⫽
`week 4 (r
`0.47, P
`0.005). There were no impor-
`⫽
`⫽
`tant changes in CD4 or CD8 lymphocyte counts or
`percentages from base line to week 4.
`
`Volume 336 Number 21
`
`ⴢ
`
`1489
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`IPR2018-00685
`Celgene Ex. 2023, Page 3
`
`

`

`The New England Journal of Medicine
`
`A
`
`B
`
`Figure 1. Major Aphthous Ulcer of Six Weeks’ Duration on the Palatopharyngeal Arch of a 30-Year-Old
`Man with the Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome (AIDS).
`AIDS was diagnosed on the basis of CD4 cell counts of less than 200 per cubic millimeter. The ulcer
`healed completely, with little scarring, after four weeks of thalidomide therapy. In the photograph in
`Panel A, obtained at the start of the study, the arrows indicate the location of the upper and lower
`ulcer margins. In the photograph in Panel B, obtained after four weeks’ treatment with thalidomide,
`the arrows indicate where the ulcer margins had been at the start of the study.
`
`Virologic Data
`The patients in the thalidomide group had a sig-
`nificantly greater increase in HIV RNA from base
`line to week 4 than the patients in the placebo group
`(median increase in the thalidomide group, 0.42
`log10 copies per milliliter; in the placebo group, 0.05;
`P⫽0.04). During the same interval, the increases in
`HIV RNA were weakly associated with the increases
`in plasma levels of TNF-a (r⫽0.34, P⫽0.05) and
`soluble TNF-a receptor type II (r⫽0.42, P⫽0.01).
`
`Safety
`Six patients in the thalidomide group discontin-
`ued the study medication because of toxic effects of
`treatment. One of the 28 patients assigned to place-
`bo requested an early discontinuation of treatment.
`The estimated probability of remaining in the study
`to day 28 without a dose reduction was 52 percent
`in the thalidomide group and 89 percent in the pla-
`cebo group.
`Twelve patients assigned to thalidomide and 11
`
`1490 ⴢ May 22, 1997
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`IPR2018-00685
`Celgene Ex. 2023, Page 4
`
`

`

`THALIDOMIDE FOR THE TREATMENT OF ORAL APHTHOUS ULCERS IN PATIENTS WITH HIV INFECTION
`
`P⫽0.052). Other adverse events in the thalidomide
`group, each observed in three patients or fewer, in-
`cluded chest pain, respiratory difficulties, fever, con-
`fusion, headaches, fatigue, dizziness, irregular heart-
`beat, lethargy, nausea, syncope, elevated levels of
`hepatic aminotransferases, and elevated levels of al-
`kaline phosphatase. In the placebo group, the ad-
`verse events included headaches, anemia, elevated
`levels of g-glutamyltransferase, elevated levels of he-
`patic aminotransferases, fever, diarrhea, fatigue, and
`hallucinations. Seven patients in the thalidomide
`group and five in the placebo group had new or
`worsened peripheral sensory neuropathy.
`During the first four weeks of study treatment,
`there were no deaths or new episodes of opportun-
`istic infections. No pregnancies occurred.
`
`DISCUSSION
`This double-blind, randomized, placebo-con-
`trolled study shows that thalidomide is effective in
`healing aphthous ulceration of the mouth and oro-
`pharynx in HIV-infected patients. The ulcers healed
`completely by week 4 in 55 percent of the patients
`in the thalidomide group, as compared with 7 per-
`cent of the patients in the placebo group. Almost all
`the patients taking thalidomide (90 percent) had at
`least partial healing. There was complete resolution
`in some patients within as little as one week after the
`start of therapy, but the median time to complete
`healing among the patients who responded was 3.5
`weeks. Quality-of-life measures clearly showed that
`thalidomide reduced the pain from the aphthous le-
`sions and improved the ability to eat.
`There were no significant differences between the
`groups in the incidence of serious adverse events,
`
`Placebo
`
`Thalidomide
`
`0
`
`2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34
`
`Weeks
`
`1.0
`0.9
`0.8
`0.7
`0.6
`0.5
`0.4
`0.3
`0.2
`0.1
`0.0
`
`Probability of Unhealed Ulcers
`
`Figure 2. Estimated Distribution of the Time Needed for Com-
`plete Healing of Aphthous Ulcers in the 57 Patients, According
`to Treatment Group.
`Open-label thalidomide was offered at week 4.
`
`patients assigned to placebo had new adverse events
`of grade 3 or higher (as classified according to the
`NIAID criteria) during the four weeks of random-
`ized treatment. Grade 4 neutropenia occurred in
`two thalidomide-treated patients who had severe
`neutropenia before therapy. One patient in the tha-
`lidomide group and two patients in the placebo
`group had grade 3 neutropenia. Somnolence was re-
`ported in seven patients in the thalidomide group
`(24 percent) and two patients in the placebo group
`(7 percent, P⫽0.144). Seven patients in the thalid-
`omide group (24 percent) had rashes, as compared
`with one patient in the placebo group (4 percent,
`
`TABLE 2. CHANGES IN PLASMA LEVELS OF TNF-a AND SOLUBLE TNF-a RECEPTOR TYPE II, ACCORDING TO
`TREATMENT GROUP.*
`
`VARIABLE AND GROUP
`
`NO. OF
`PATIENTS
`
`BASE-LINE
`VALUE
`
`P
`VALUE
`
`NO. OF
`PATIENTS
`
`CHANGE, BASE LINE
`TO WEEK 2†
`
`P
`VALUE
`
`NO. OF
`PATIENTS
`
`CHANGE, BASE LINE
`TO WEEK 4†
`
`P
`VALUE
`
`median
`(interquartile range)
`
`median
`(interquartile range)
`
`median
`(interquartile range)
`
`TNF-a (pg/ml)
`Placebo
`Thalidomide
`Soluble TNF-a receptor
`type II (ng/ml)
`Placebo
`Thalidomide
`
`22
`20
`
`22
`20
`
`37.09 (22.32, 75.85) 0.870
`36.97 (25.97, 48.62)
`
`3.60 (2.81, 5.59)
`3.75 (2.85, 5.12)
`
`0.890
`
`20
`16
`
`20
`16
`
`⫺0.31 (⫺5.60, 3.55) 0.001‡
`12.16§ (5.63, 22.98)
`
`20 ⫺0.91 (⫺9.49, 6.66) 0.090
`14
`4.04 (0.14, 8.83)
`
`⫺0.17 (⫺0.43, 0.27)
`1.46§ (0.53, 1.87)
`
`0.002‡
`
`20
`14
`
`⫺0.05 (⫺0.50, 0.28)
`0.53§ (0.31, 1.06)
`
`0.007‡
`
`*P values are for the difference between groups.
`†Positive values indicate that the level increased from base line to the week shown; negative values indicate that the level decreased. The levels during a
`specified period around the date of the visit were averaged (in the case of base-line values, the measurements considered were made at or before the base-
`line visit). Changes from base line are the differences between the average values. Mean (⫾SD) normal values for TNF-a are 9.5⫾5.7 pg per milliliter; and
`for soluble TNF-a receptor type II, 2 1⫾0.7 ng per milliliter. Data on 42 of the 57 patients were used in the analysis.
`‡P⬍0.05 by the two-sample Wilcoxon rank-sum test for the comparison of the difference in changes between groups.
`§P⬍0.05 by the Wilcoxon signed-rank test for the comparison of the base-line and post–base-line values within the group.
`
`Volume 336 Number 21
`
`ⴢ 1491
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`IPR2018-00685
`Celgene Ex. 2023, Page 5
`
`

`

`The New England Journal of Medicine
`
`but not all the patients could tolerate the initial
`therapeutic regimen (200 mg per day) for the entire
`four weeks of the randomized study. Approximately
`half the patients either discontinued the study med-
`ication permanently or had their doses reduced be-
`fore the four-week course ended. Half of these treat-
`ment changes were due to rash or excessive sedation.
`Peripheral sensory neuropathy was not found with
`greater frequency in the thalidomide group. How-
`ever, such neuropathy is a known complication of
`longer-term thalidomide treatment.29 Given the oth-
`er neuropathic insults to which HIV-infected pa-
`tients are exposed, patients receiving thalidomide
`must be monitored carefully for this potential toxic
`effect.
`Thalidomide is notorious for its teratogenic ef-
`fects.30-32 During the period of pregnancy when
`there is known sensitivity to the effects of thalido-
`mide (21 to 35 days after conception), even a single
`dose of thalidomide is dangerous.31 If thalidomide is
`given to women with childbearing potential, the
`treatment should be accompanied by cautionary
`measures, including careful informed-consent proce-
`dures, a requirement that effective birth control be
`used, testing for pregnancy every two weeks, warn-
`ing labels on packages and vials, and preestablished
`procedures for counseling and monitoring in the
`event of pregnancy. We believe that this approach
`should be used so that women with childbearing po-
`tential can receive this treatment and other poten-
`tially beneficial therapies of known or uncertain ter-
`atogenic risk.
`Recently, the immune-modulating and angiogen-
`esis-inhibiting activities of thalidomide have been
`recognized.33-35 The drug has shown evidence of ef-
`fectiveness in treating graft-versus-host disease in
`transplant recipients34 and in treating erythema no-
`dosum leprosum.35 Most descriptions of the use of
`thalidomide to treat aphthous ulcers in HIV-infect-
`ed patients and others have been case reports and
`retrospective series.3-14 However, one placebo-con-
`trolled, double-blind, crossover trial with no wash-
`out period reported success with 100 mg of thalid-
`omide per day in presumably non–HIV-infected
`subjects.15 End points related to both prophylaxis
`and treatment were combined in that trial.
`The cause of aphthous ulceration has not been es-
`tablished. Viral, immunologic, hormonal, and stress-
`related factors have all been suggested.36 Evidence of
`HIV RNA or protein has been found in some mac-
`rophages at the bases of esophageal ulcers in some
`patients with the acquired immunodeficiency syn-
`drome (AIDS).37 However, it is likely that the direct
`cause of aphthous ulceration is immunologic36,37
`and that the mechanism of action of thalidomide,
`like that of corticosteroids, is based on its immune-
`modulating properties.
`Our study failed to elucidate the putative immuno-
`
`1492 ⴢ May 22, 1997
`
`logic mechanism, however. Although thalidomide was
`reported to inhibit the production of TNF-a,16-20,38,39
`our data did not show that TNF-a was inhibited, at
`least not systemically. Plasma levels of both TNF-a
`and soluble TNF-a receptor type II increased in the
`thalidomide-treated patients as compared with those
`receiving placebo. This suggests either that TNF-a
`is not important in the pathogenesis of aphthous ul-
`cers or that if it is, the effect may occur locally in the
`tissues. It is more likely that other mechanisms are
`involved.
`Our data suggest that thalidomide enhances the
`production of HIV. This contradicts in vitro find-
`ings18 but is consistent with the results of our meas-
`urements of TNF-a and lends support to the pro-
`posed relation between the activation of TNF-a and
`viral expression from HIV-infected cells.21 TNF-a
`induces the expression of HIV from chronically in-
`fected cell lines by stimulating nuclear factor-kB, a
`cellular transcription factor used by HIV.21 Because
`of the effect of thalidomide on the HIV load and on
`the levels of soluble TNF-a receptor type II, two
`measures associated with the clinical progression of
`HIV disease,40-43 we urge caution in using thalido-
`mide in HIV-infected persons after the two to four
`weeks of short-term treatment.
`Our data indicate that when large, nonhealing
`aphthous ulcers of the gastrointestinal tract develop
`in HIV-infected patients, the patients usually have
`advanced immunosuppression. The median absolute
`CD4 cell count in our patients was 25 cells per cubic
`millimeter; 89 percent had CD4 counts of less than
`200 cells per cubic millimeter. Thus, such ulceration
`should probably be considered an AIDS-defining
`event.
`Few data are available on the incidence of severe
`aphthous ulcers among HIV-infected patients. They
`are certainly uncommon, but when they do occur
`they are often devastating. Our study shows that tha-
`lidomide is clearly effective in treating this condition.
`
`Supported in part by the ACTG, NIAID; and in part by the General
`Clinical Research Center Units funded by the National Center for Research
`Resources.
`
`We are indebted to Susan Stehn and Jana Parson for technical
`support, to Evangeline Leash for editorial assistance, to Carmen Al-
`icea for secretarial assistance, to the clinicians who referred patients
`to the study, and to the patients who participated in it.
`
`APPENDIX
`
`In addition to the study authors, the ACTG protocol 251 team included:
`D. Greenspan and F. Aweeka, University of California, San Francisco;
`C. Trapnell and L. Purdue, Division of AIDS, NIAID; J. McFarland and
`W. Levy, ACTG Operations Center, Social and Scientific Systems, Rock-
`ville, Md ; G. Jones, Data Management Center, Frontier Science Technol-
`ogy and Research Foundation, Amherst, N.Y.; D. Simpson, Mount Sinai
`School of Medicine, New York; A. Bardequez, New Jersey Medical School,
`Newark; R. Clark, Tulane University, New Orleans; N. Quesada, University
`of California, Los Angeles; and P.J. Andrulis, Jr., and M.W. Drulak, Andru-
`lis Pharmaceuticals, Beltsville, Md.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`IPR2018-00685
`Celgene Ex. 2023, Page 6
`
`

`

`THALIDOMIDE FOR THE TREATMENT OF ORAL APHTHOUS ULCERS IN PATIENTS WITH HIV INFECTION
`
`Other investigators at participating sites were as follows: L. Bessen and
`K. Luykx, Mount Sinai Medical Center, New York; S. Forstat, University of
`California, San Francisco; M. Cruz-Ortiz, University of Puerto Rico, San
`Juan; C. van der Horst, University of North Carolin

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket