throbber
wit
`2004-07-25 07:29:43
`
`6amobedsiguoUIoy)1
`
`pe ¢
`
`‘
`
`Celgene Ex. 2009, Page 1
`
`-
`a
`: ere ans a pape boos eee
`aed ALR CELL OrESTERTat)
`
`CHURCHILL LIVINGSTONE
`
`te ne mere oh. te teem :
`
`IPR2018-00685
`
`i3
`
`
`
`“1aUBUAGOD“SfAqpepelodoqowpuw
`
`IPR2018-00685
`Celgene Ex. 2009, Page 1
`
`

`

`Correspondence
`
`23177
`
`4 Moskowitz C, Dutcher JP, Wierik PH, Association of thyroid disease
`with acute leukemia, Am { Hematol 1992; 39; 102-107.
`5 De Resa C, Delia 8, Corselo SV Cecchini L, Calla €. Autoimmune
`polyglandular syndrome, primary emply sella, and acute lymphocytic
`leukaemia. Clin Endocrinol 1987; 2'7;535-543,
`
`6 Ergas D, Tsimanis A, Shtalrid M, Duskin C, Berrebi A, T-y large granular
`lymphocyte leukemia associated with amegakaryocytic thrombocyto-
`penic purpura, Sjogren’s syndrome, and polyglandular autoimmune
`syndrome type Il, with subsequent development cd pure rad cal
`aplasia. Am { Hematol! 2002; 69: 132-134.
`
`Thalidomide therapy induces response in relapsed mantle cell lymphoma
`Leukemia (2003) 17, 1944-1915. dol:10.1038/s}.leu.2403058
`
`relapsed with bene marrow invelvement,
`the patient
`2002),
`splenomegaly, an elevated LDH (6001U/L), and a poor performance
`status (KPS=3). He was started on thalidomide 100me/day plus
`dexamethasone (40me/day x 4 days). After
`4 month,
`the patient
`demonstrated a significant decrease in splenomegaly and the LDH
`level, but remained pancytopenic, The dose of thalidomide was not
`increased because of
`side effects
`(constipation,
`fatigue,
`and
`paresthesia) and the dexamethasone was stopped. Over the next
`5 months, while taking only thalidomide 100 mg/day, the patient
`demonstrated progressive improvement of his disease, with resolu-
`tion of the splenomegaly, normalization of the LDH and hemoglo-
`bin levels, and significant
`improvement of his neutrophil and
`platelet counts (1.0 and 86 x 10°/l, respectively). At last follow-up
`(March 2003), the patient maintains his response,
`taking thalido-
`mide 100me/day without any severe toxicity.
`Since the first and subsequent reports of its aficacy in multiple
`myeloma," there has been a growing interest in thalidomide as
`an anticancer therapy, The pracise mechanisms responsible for
`thalidomide’s antitumor effect remain unknown. Thalidomide ma
`act directly on tumor cells to induce apoptosis or call cycle arrest,
`or indirectly, by acting to inhibit angiogenes|s,° alter immune cell
`cytokine secretion,’
`enhance T cell,”
`natural killer cell’
`and
`dendritic cell activity,”
`and inhibit NF-«B activity.” These two
`casas representthe first two reports of the therapautic potential of
`thatidomide
`In
`refractory MCL. Based on these encouraging
`preliminary results, and the immediate need for improved therapy
`for the treatment ef MCL, prospective phaseII trials involving larger
`groups d patienis are warranted,
`in vitro studies are underway to
`delineate the mechanism of action of thalidomide in MCL.
`
`Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is an aggressive B-cell lymphoma that
`cannot be cured despite aggressive therapy,
`including autologous
`stem cell transplantation, Thalidomide is an immunomodulatory
`drug with numerous properties tat has proven effective in relapsed
`multipfe myelorna and, to a lesser extent,
`in other hematological
`diseases, such as myelodysplastic syndromes and myeloproliferative
`disorders, We
`report
`two cases of
`relapsec refractory MCL
`successfully treated with thalidomide,
`The first patient is a 70-year-old man, who presented in 1995
`with stage IV MCL. He was treated according to the current protocol
`at cur institution, 28 reported elsawhers.’ He received CHOP x four
`cycles with only a partial
`response (PR),
`followad by high-
`dose cytarabine-based chemotherapy (DHAP), and consolidation
`with an auiglogous stem cell transplant utilizing total body irradiation
`(FB, melphalan, and cytarabine as the preparative regimen, A
`complete response (CR) was obtained. The patient relapsed 40
`months later, presenting with diffuse peripheral and abdominal
`lymphadenopathy, splenomagaly, bone marrow and peripheral blood
`involvement, and 4 lactate dehydrogenasa {LDH} level twice the
`normal. As salvage chemotherapy,
`the patient received concurrent
`cytarabine (2g/m7/12 h, days 1-3) and etoposide (200 mg/m?/day,
`days 1-3). After a transient response, the patient progressed 3 weeks
`after the third cycle. The patient next received two cycles of
`concurrent fludarabine (3O0mg/m*/day, days 1-3) and cyclopho-
`sphamide (800mg/m@/day, days 1-3), and obtained PR. Treatment
`was
`complicated
`by persistent grade 4
`pancytopenia
`(ANC
`<0,1 x 70°) and infection. As a consequenca, the patient declined
`further chemotherapy. Affer 4 months, when the patient's peripheral
`lymphadencpathy increased, he received a 4-week course of
`rituximab (375 mg/m* per week) without any response.
`In June
`2001, the patient devaloped worsening pancytopenia and compras~
`sive iilac lymphadenopathy and started thalidomide at 200 mp/day,
`increasing by 700mg/day every 2 weeks, up to 500me/day.
`Hematopoiesis and lymphadenopathy progressively improved, with
`the patient becoming transfusion independent within 2 months of
`beginning thalidomide, By the 4th month,
`the hemoglobin and
`platelet levels had reached 12 g/dl and 176x 10/1, respectively, with
`a complete disappearanca of peripheral blood atypical
`lymphocytes
`1 Lefrere F, Delmer A Suzan F, Levy V, Belanger G Djabarri M
`and a 50% reduction in the size of the lymphadenopathy. Over the
`et af. Sequential chemotherapy by CHOP and OHAP regimens
`next year, the patient maintained his response on 300 mg/day of
`followed by high-dose therapy with stem ceil transplantation induces
`thalidomide, Although the patient was tolerating the thalidomide, the
`a high rate d complete response and improves event-free survival in
`dose was Cecreased to 200me/day for 2 weeks each month,
`to
`mantle cell
`lymphoma: a prospective study. Leukemia 2002;
`14:
`587-593.
`decrease the risk of chronic thajidornice side effects, After 4 months
`ho
`Singhal § Mehta], Desikan R. Ayers D, Robersen P, EddlemionPet al.
`(September 2002), the patient's disease progressed, with reappear-
`Antitumor activity of thalidomide in refractory multipie myeloma,
`ance of the pancytopenia and increased tymphadenopathy. A bone
`N Engl } Med 1999: 344: 1565-1571.
`marrow examination was not performed, Thalidomide was increased
`3 Rajkumar §V, Gertz MA, Lacy MQ, Dispenzieri A. Fonseca R, Ceyer
`to 200 mg each day in combination with three courses of monthly
`& et al. Thalidomide as
`initial
`therapy for early-stage myeloma,
`Leukemia 2003; 17: 775-779.
`dexamethasone (40me@/day x 4 days), reachieving a partial response.
`At 179 months since first starting thalidomide, the patient remains allve
`Rajkumar SV, Dispenzier| A. Forseca R. Lacy MQ, Ceyer § LustJA
`and with a good partial response.
`et af, Thalidomide for previously untreated indolent or smoldering
`muitple myeloma. Lewkern/a 2001; 15: 1274-1276,
`The second patient
`is a 66-year-old man, who presented with
`5 Raje N, Anderson K, Thalidomidea revival story. N Eng! { Med 1999;
`stage IV MCL, and initially achieved a CR after receiving three
`341: 1606-1609.
`cycles of CHOP, followed by three cycles of DHAP in combination
`with rituximab, and an autologous stam cell transplant utilizing TBI,
`melphalan, and cytarabine as consolidation, After 2 years (May
`
`‘Department of Hamatology, Hapital
`Nacker Enfanis-Malades, Paris, France;
`‘Department of Hematology, Mount Sinai
`School of Medicine, NY, USA
`
`G Damaj'?
`F Lefrére
`R Delarue'
`B Varet’
`R Furman?
`O Hermine’
`
`References
`
`hb
`
`3 Current address:institut Paoli, Calmettes, 232 Blvd sainte Marguerite,
`13273 cedex 9, Marseilla, France
`
`IPR2018-00685
`Celgene Ex. 2009, Page 2
`
`

`

`
`Cotrespondence
`1915
`
`Folkman !. Thalidomide is an
`6 D'Amato Ri Loughnan MS, Flynn €
`inhibitor of angiogenesis. Proc Nat! Acad Sci 1994; 91: 40582-4085.
`7 Corral .G, Haslett PA, Muller CW, Ghen R Wong LM, Ocampo C]
`et af. Differential cytokine modulation and T cell activation by two
`distinct classes cf thalidomide analogues that are potent inhibitors of
`TNF-alpha. / immune! 1999; 163:380-386,
`Haslett PAJ, Corral LG, Aibert M, Kaplan G. Thalidomidca costimulates
`primary human T lymphocytes, preferentially inducing proliferation,
`cytokine production, and cytotoxic responses in the CD8+ subset. { xp
`Mecf 1998; 187: 1885-1892,
`
`9 Davies FE, Raje N, Hideshima T, Lantesch §& Young G, Tai YT
`et af, Thalidomide and immunomodulatory derivatives augment
`natural killer cell cytotoxicity in multiple myeioma. Blood 2001: 98:
`210-216,
`10 Monty M, Stoppa AM, Blaise D, Isnardon D, Gastaut JA, Olive D
`et al Differential
`regulation of dendritic call
`function by the
`immunomodulatory drug thalidomide. { Leukocute Biof 2002; 72:
`939-945.
`inhibition of
`11 Keifer JA, Cuttridge DC, Ashburner BP, Baldwin jr. AS.
`NF-«B Activity by Thalidomide through Suppression of IxB Kinase
`Activity. f Biol Chem 2001; 276: 22382-22387.
`
`AML with t(8;21) and trisomy 4: possible involvement of c-kit?
`
`SE Langabear'
`A Beghini*
`L Larizza?
`
`References
`
`institute of
`‘leukaernia ResearchF und Centre,
`Cancer Research, London, LK;
`* Department of Siology and Genatics, Medical
`Faculty, University of Milan, Mitan,
`italy
`
`wooN
`
`Nishii K Usui Katayama N, Lorenzo F, Nakase K, KobayashiT et al,
`Characteristics of t(8;2 1) acute myeloid laukemia(AML) with additional
`chromosomal abnormality: concomitant tisomy 4 may constitute a
`distinctive subtype of 48:21) AML. Leukemia 2003: 17; 731-737.
`Speck NA, Gilliland OC, Core-binding factors in haematopciesis and
`leukaemia. Nat Rev Cancer 2002; 2: 502-513,
`Cari M, Coodeve A Wilson C, Winship P, Langabeer§, Linch D etal,
`C-kit proto-oncogeneexon 8 in-frarne deletion plus insertion mutations
`in acute myeloid leukaemia. Gr / Haematol 1999; 105; 694-900.
`Baghini A PeterlongoR Ripamont! C8, Larizza |, Calroll R, Morra E
`etal. C-kit mutationsin core binding factor laukemias. Blood 2000; 95:
`726-727.
`BeghiniA Ripamortl C8, Castorina P, Pezzettil, Doneda i, Cairoli R
`et al, Trisomy 4 leadingto a duplication of a mutated KIT allele in acute
`myeloid leukemiawith mast cell involvament. Cancer Genet Cytogenet
`2000; 119: 26-34.
`|, Ripamonti CS. Larizza L. Amplification of
`6 Baghini A’ Magnani
`2 noval c-kit activating mutation Asn®??-Lys In the Kasumi-1 cell line:
`a (8;21)-kit mutant model for acute myeloid leukemia, Haematology
`J 2002; 3: 187-163.
`7 Ning 27Q, LiJ, Arceci RJ, Activating mutations of c-kit at codon 816
`confer drug resistance in human leukemia cells, Leukemia Lymphoma
`2001; 41; 513-522,
`8 Heinrich MC, Blanke CD, Druker BJ, Coness CL. Inhibition of KIT
`tyrosine Kinaseactivity: a novel molecular approachto the treatmentof
`KIT-pesitive malignancies. { Clin Oncol 2002; 20: 1692—1703.
`
`a o
`
`r
`
`Leukemia (2003)17, 1915. dol:10.1038/sj.leu.2403066
`TO THE EDITOR
`
`Nishiiet af have recently described a minor subset of acute myeloid
`faukemia (AML) patients with 8;21) and trisomy 4, who had a
`relatively poor prognosis when compared to (8:27) AML patients
`with or without other cytogenetic abnormalities, A raview of the
`literature suggests a possible mechanism for this poor prognosis.
`Current theory regarding the pathogenesis of AML, especially in
`those patients with either a (8:27)(q22;q22) or
`inv(T6)(pt3q22)
`abnormality, has postulated the ccoperativity of core-binding factor
`(CBF) gene rearrangements (AML 7-€7Oand CBFB-MYH? 1, respec-
`tively) with mutations in thosa ganes ancading receptor tyrosine
`kinases (eg FLTS, KIT)’
`In particular, mutations cf the s-kit gene,
`located at chromosome 4q11-q12, have been detected in a
`significant proportion of patients with CBF-AML?® and also in two
`patients with (8;21) and trisomy 4.4 In one of these latter patients,
`the trisomy 4 lead to duplication and thus increased dosage of the
`mutated c-kit alleie® suggesting an additional mechanism of
`leukemogenesis. This observation is supported by evidence of
`amplitication of a c-kit mutation in the (821) and trisomy four-
`positive cell
`tine Kasumi-1.° Further
`investigation js
`therefore
`warranted to determine the presence of ¢-kit mutations in the three
`(8:21) AML patients with trisomy 4 describad by Nishii etal,’ as the
`most commen activating mutation of c-kit has been show to confer
`drug resistance,’ which could be partly rasponsitle for the relatively
`poor prognosis.
`If mutations are present,
`these patients may be
`eligible for additional treatment with novel therapies that inhibit KIT
`tyrosine kinase activity.’
`
`Reply to SE Langabeer et al
`
`Leukemia (2003)17, 1915-1916. dof:10. 1088/sj.leu.2403067
`TO THE EDITOR
`
`Dr. Langabeer and his colleagues made several interesting sugges-
`tions in discussing our recent paper.” Qur work showed that t(8;217}
`acute myslold leukemia (AML) with trisomy 4 had different
`morphology, phenotype, and clinical outcome when compared to
`(8:21) AML with or without other chromosomal abnormalities,
`especially t(8;21} AML plus trisomy 4 having a poor prognosis. Dr.
`Langabeer et a/, speculate that the presence of c-kit mutation in the
`{8;21} AML patients with trisomy 4 may have caused these events. It
`had been reported that c-kit mutations were more frequently
`observed in core binding factor
`leukemia.2 Among thase c-kit
`
`Correspondence: Dr K Nishii, Fax: +81 59 234 6200
`
`mutations, mutation of codon 816 (most commonly Asp816Val) of
`the c-kit caused constitutive activation of the KIT kinase*? and had
`been shown to confer drug résistance. *” Therefore, we examined
`for c-kit mutation in a t(8:21) AML with trisomy 4 sample among
`those reported by Nishii et ai! only one sample was available for
`analysis, Mutation screening was targeted on exon 17 at codon 816
`{amine acid 2468) of c-kit. CDNA was amolified using reverse
`transcription-polymerase chain reactlon {RT-PCR) method and
`amino-acid sequence Was investigated as described previously."
`As shown in Figure 1, the presence of the Asp816Val mutation was
`detacted in leukemic cells from this sample. Beghini at a/1®"! also
`reported the mutation of codon 816 of c-kit gene in two cases of
`4(8;21) AML with trisomy 4. These observations led us to speculate
`that an activating mutation of c-kit may be associated with 1(8;21)
`AML with trisomy 4, perhaps this additional aberration could have
`caused the poor prognosis. To confirm the relationship between
`
`IPR2018-00685
`Celgene Ex. 2009, Page 3
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket