throbber
Pett Ve feee a
`
`Petitioner Sirius XM Radio Inc. - Ex. 1021, p. 1
`
`“Seegeraee
`
`a
`
`=f
`
`Petitioner Sirius XM Radio Inc. - Ex. 1021, p. 1
`
`

`

` This book was set in Times Roman by Science Typographers, Inc.
`
`Printed and bound by Book-mart Press, Inc.
`
`DIGITAL COMMUNICATIONS
`
`Copyright © 1989, 1983 by McGraw-Hill, Inc. All rights reserved.
`Printed in the United States of America. Except as permitted under the
`United States Copyright Act of 1976, no part of this publication may be
`reproducedor distributed in any form or by any means, or stored in a data
`base or retrieval system, without prior written permission of the
`publisher.
`
`456789 BKM BKM 99876543
`
`ISBN 0-07-05093?-4
`
`Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data
`
`Proakis, John G.
`Digital communications/John G. Proakis.—2nd ed.
`p. om.--(McGraw-Hill series in electrical engineering.
`Communications andsignal processing)
`Includes bibliographies and index.
`ISBN 0-07-050937-9
`1. Digital communications.
`TK5103,7.P76
`1989
`621.38'0413--dcl9
`
`I.Title.
`
`IT. Series.
`
`88-31455
`
`
`
`
`Petitioner Sirius X
`
`M Radio Inc. - Ex. 1021, p. 2
`
`
`Petitioner Sirius XM Radio Inc. - Ex. 1021, p. 2
`
`

`

`-HARACTERIZATION OF
`IGNALS AND
`
`ndwidth is much smaller than the carrier frequency are termed narrowband
`
`znals can be categorized in a numberof different ways such as random versus
`terministic, discrete time versus continuous time, discrete amplitude versus
`lowpass versus bandpass, finite energy versus infinite
`ergy, finite average powerversusinfinite average power, etc. In this chapter we
`at the characterization of signals and systems that are usually encountered in
`> transmission ofdigital information over a communication channel. In partic-
`ir, we introduce the representation of various forms of digitally modulated
`mals and describe their spectral characteristics.
`We begin with the characterization of bandpass signals and systems,
`luding the mathematical representation of bandpass stationary stochastic
`ocesses. Then, we present a vector space representation of signals. We conclude
`th the representation of digitally modulated signals and their spectral charac-
`
`| REPRESENTATION OF BANDPASS
`GNALS AND SYSTEMS
`
`CHARACTERIZATION OF SIGNALS AND sysTEMS
`
`149
`
`the
`bandpass signals and channels (systems). The modulation performed at
`transmitting end of the communication system to generate the bandpass signal
`and the demodulation performed at
`the receiving end to recover the digital
`information involve frequency translations. With no loss in generality and for
`mathematical convenience,
`it is desirable to reduce all bandpass signals and
`channels to equivalent lowpass signals and channels. As a consequence,
`the
`results of the performance of the various modulation and demodulation tech-
`niques presented in the subsequent chapters are independentof carrier frequen-
`cies and channel frequency bands. The representation of bandpass signals and
`systems in terms of equivalent lowpass waveforms and the characterization of
`bandpass stationary stochastic processes are the main topics of this section.
`
`3.1.1 Representation of Bandpass Signals
`
`A real-valued signal s(t) with a frequency content concentrated in a narrow band
`of frequencies in the vicinity of a frequency f, can be expressed in the form
`s(t) = a(t) cos [2af,t + 6(t)]
`(3.1.1)
`where a(t) denotes the amplitude (envelope) of s(¢), and @(t) denotes the phase
`of s(t). The frequency f,
`is usually called the carrier of s(t) and may be any
`convenient frequency within or near the frequency band occupied bythesignal.
`Whenthe band of frequencies occupied by s(t) is small relative to f,, the signal is
`called a narrowband bandpass signal or, simply, a bandpass signal.
`By expandingthe cosine function in (3.1.1) a second representation for s(t)
`is obtained, namely,
`s(t) = a(t) cos 0(t) cos2af,t — a(t) sin O(t) sin 2f,t
`(3.1.2)
`= x(t) cos2af,t ~— y(t) sin2af,t
`where the signals x(t) and y(t), termed the quadrature components of s(t), are
`defined as
`
`x(t) = a(t) cos 0(t)
`y(t) = a(t) sin O(t)
`The frequency content of the quadrature components x(t) and y(t) is concen-
`trated at low frequencies (around f= 0, as shown below) and, hence,
`these
`components are appropriately called lowpass signals. Finally, a third representa-
`tion for s(t) is obtained from (3.1.1) by defining the complex envelope u(t) as
`u(t) = a(t)e®O
`= x(t) + jy(t)
`
`(3.1.4)
`
`(3.1.3)
`
`Petitioner Sirius XM Radio Inc. - Ex. 1021, p. 3
`
`

`

`Use of the identity
`
`Re (£) = 3(é + &*)
`
`(3.1.7)
`
`€=]
`
`s(t) at
`
`in (3.1.6) yields the result
`S(f) = fo [u(t) ef2met + u*(t)ePret] es2nft dt
`(3.1.8)
`3[U(f- 7.) + U-f-f)]
`where U(f) is the Fourier transform of u(t). Since the frequency content of the
`bandpasssignal s(t) is concentrated in the vicinity of the carrier f.. the result in
`(3.1.8) indicates that the frequency content of u(t) is concentrated in the vicinity
`of f = 0. Consequently, the complex-valued waveform u(t) is basically a low-pass
`signal waveform and, hence, is called the equivalent lowpass signal.
`The energyin the signal s(t) is defined as
`[oa]
`fst)
`(3.1.9)
`= fo {Re[u(t)emt]}? at
`Whenthe identity in (3.1.7) is used in (3.1.9), we obtain the following result:
`1
`se
`&= xlus)Pat
`(3.1.10)
`+57 lule)Poos [4nfs + 26(1)] at
`Consider the second integral in (3.1.10). Since the signal s(t) is narrowband, the
`real envelope a(t) = |u(t)| or, equivalently, a2(1) varies slowly relative to
`the rapid variations exhibited by the cosine function. A graphical illustration
`of the integrand in the second integral of (3.1.10) is shown in Fig. 3.1.1. The value
`of the integralis just the net area underthe cosine function modulated by a?(t).
`Since the modulating waveform a?(r) varies slowly relative to the cosine func-
`tion, the net area contributed by the secondintegralis very small relative to the
`valueof the first integral in (3.1.10) and, hence, it can be neglected. Thus, for all
`practical purposes, the energy in the bandpasssignal S(t), expressed in terms of
`the equivalent lowpasssignal u(t), is
`
`~ 6
`
`&= Ok
`where |u(t)| is just the envelope a(t) of s(t).
`
`(3.1.11)
`
`
`
`ug
`iee
`
`FIGURE3.1.1
`The signal a2(t)cos[4af.t + 20(1)].
`
`3.1.2 Representation of Linear Bandpass Systems
`A linearfilter or system may be described either by its impulse response A(t
`by its frequency response H(f), which is the Fourier transform of A(t). Si
`h(?) is real,
`
`Let us define C(f — f,) as
`
`H*(—f) = H(f)
`
` a(t)
`
`Then
`
`cif) = (0)
`
`hoo
`
`C*(-f-f.) = (-N)
`
`hob
`
`Using (3.1.12), we have
`
`H(f)=C(f-f.) + C(-f-f.)
`
`The inverse transform of H(f) in (3.1.15) yields A(t) in the form
`
`h(t) = c(t)el?h + c*(t)e2m
`= 2Re[c(t)e?7%']
`where c(t) is the inverse Fourier transform of C(f). In general,
`response c(t) of the equivalent lowpass system is complex-valued.
`
`Petitioner Sirius XM Radio Inc. - Ex. 1021, p. 4
`
`Petitioner Sirius XM Radio Inc. - Ex. 1021, p. 4
`
`

`

`Fourier transform of s(t) is
`S(f) = [isere dt
`=f (Re[u(t)es2*h']} eetat
`
`Re(£) = 3( + &*)
`
`(3.1.6)
`
`(3.1.7)
`
`— 0
`
`S(f) _ sf” [u(t)e/2met + u*(t)e/2rh] e—s2aft dt
`(3.1.8)
`= +[U(f-f.) + U(-f-f)]
`f) is the Fourier transform of u(t). Since the frequency contentof the
`signal s(t) is concentrated in the vicinity of the carrier f,, the result in
`icates that the frequency content of u(t) is concentrated in the vicinity
`-onsequently, the complex-valued waveform u(t)is basically a low-pass
`eform and,hence,is called the equivalent lowpass signal.
`energy in the signal s(t) is defined as
`é= i: s(t) dt
`(3.1.9)
`=f (Re[u(t)e*] }? at
`identity in (3.1.7) is used in (3.1.9), we obtain the following result:
`é= xf lu(s)iPae
`(3.1.10)
`+ sf. |u(t)|?cos [4arf,t + 20(t)] at
`he second integral in (3.1.10). Since the signal s(t) is narrowband, the
`ope a(t) = |u(z)| or, equivalently, a7(t) varies slowly relative to
`variations exhibited by the cosine function. A graphical illustration
`grand in the secondintegral of (3.1.10) is shown in Fig. 3.1.1. The value
`gral is just the net area under the cosine function modulated by a(t).
`modulating waveform a?(t) varies slowly relative to the cosine func-
`et area contributed by the second integral is very small relative to the
`e first integral in (3.1.10) and, hence, it can be neglected. Thus, for all
`urposes, the energy in the bandpass signal s(r), expressed in terms of
`lent lowpass signal u(t), is
`
`
`
`CHARACTERIZATION OF SIGNALS AND SYSTEMS
`
`151
`
`a*(t)
`
`
`
`og
`Hi
`
`FIGURE3.1.1
`The signal a?(t)cos{4af.t + 20(1)].
`
`3.1.2 Representation of Linear Bandpass Systems
`
`A linearfilter or system may be described either by its impulse response A(1) or
`by its frequency response H(/), which is the Fourier transform of A(t). Since
`h(t) is real,
`
`Let us define C(f — f,) as
`
`H*(-f)=H(f)
`
`Then
`
`C(f-f.) = (gi
`
`hoo
`
`C*(-f-f.) = (7) a
`
`(3.1.12)
`
`(3.1.13)
`
`(3.1.14)
`
`Using (3.1.12), we have
`
`H(f) =C(f-f.) + CX -f-f.)
`
`(3.1.15)
`
`The inverse transform of H(/) in (3.1.15) yields A(t) in the form
`
`h(t) = (test + c*(t)e Pe
`= 2Re[c(1)e?7/]
`
`(3.1.16)
`
`
`
`Petitioner Sirius XM Radio Inc. - Ex. 1021, p. 5
`
`

`

`wrthogonal signals. Consider the two signals
`Hence,
`
`5,(t) = /2¢S cos 2aft O<t<T
`uf + U2 +=pain/2
`
`P2= Tatu
`7
`(4.1.21)
`_
`= —j=e-%
`4.1.21
`Multiphase signals. Consider the M-ary PSK signals
`sw(t) = 38 cos [amt + 27(m —1)| m=1,2,....M,0<t<T
`26 cos a(m — 1) cos2nf,t — (22 sin aT(m — 1)sin27f,t
`
`5,(t) = Teé sin 2af.t O<t<T
`
`(4.1.16)
`
`ither f. = 1/T or f, > 1/T,so that
`Re(p,>) = al, s,(t)s,(t) dt =0
`e ( Pir) = 0, the two signals are orthogonal.
`¢ equivalent lowpass waveforms corresponding to s,(t) and s,(t) are
`
`1
`
`sT
`
`(4.1.17)
`
`2€
`u(t) => O<t<T
`
`28
`u,(t) = -j r O<1<T
`
`(4.1.18)
`
`these signal waveforms can be represented as two-dimensional signal
`
`(4.1.19)
`—_s, = (0, -vé)
`s,=(V@,0)
`perespond to the signal space diagram shown in Fig. 4.1.2. Note that
`2 observe that the vector representation for the equivalent lowpasssignals
`u,,] and u, = [u,,] where
`
`= (2 + j0
`
`n = 0-jy2é
`
`(4.1.20)
`
`Signal-space diagram for binary orthogonal signals.
`
`
`
`225
`
` MODULATION AND DEMODULATION FOR THE ADDITIVE GAUSSIAN NOISE CHANNEL
`
`(4.1.22)
`
`‘The equivalent lowpass signal waveforms are
`
` m=1,2,...,M,0<t<T (4.1.23)
`u,(t) = [28neemD/M
`‘These signal waveformsare represented by the two-dimensional vectors
`= Ve cos ot(m — 1), Vé sin at(m - 1)| m=1,2,...,M (4.1.24)
`
`or in complex-valued form as
`
`= y2 Gel2nim—V)/M
`
`and are described by the signalspace diagram shownin Fig. 4.1.3. Clearly, these
`nignals have equal energy. Their complex-valued correlation coefficients are
`eeSOLO k =1,2,...,M,m=1,2,...,M
`= ei2a(m—k)/M
`(4.1.25)
`
`
`
`Petitioner Sirius XM Radio Inc. - Ex. 1021, p. 6
`
`

`

`
`
`
`dum = {26(1 — Re(Pym)] }””
`= (26[1 — cos 5(m — k) \""
`
`
`(4.1.27)
`
`The minimum distance d,,;, corresponds to the case in which |m — k| = 1, 1e.,
`adjacent signal phases. In this case
`
`d
`
`26(1 — cos a
`
`27
`
`(4.1.28)
`
`The special case of four phase signals (M = 4) results in the signal vectors
`s,=(V8,0)
`s,=(0,Ve)
`s;=(-Vvé,0)
` s,=(0,-vé) (4.1.29)
`and the signal space diagram shownin Fig. 4.1.3a. These signal vectors may also
`be viewed as two pairs of orthogonal signals, i.e., the pair of vectors (S,,$3) is
`orthogonal to (s,,8,). On the other hand, the pair (s,,s,) is antipodal and so is
`the pair (s,,s,). These four signals are called biorthogonal. The general class of
`biorthogonal signals is considered below.
`
`Multiamplitude signals. Consider the M-ary PAM signals
`
`
`2vé
`—_—_—
`S,
`S,
`8;
`0. 8
`M=6
`
`FIGURE4.1.4
`Signal-space diagrams for M-ary PAM signals.
`
`Hence, the distance between a pair of adjacent signal points, i.e., th
`distance,is
`
`Amin = 2vé
`Examples of signal space diagrams for M-ary PAMsignals are sh
`4.1.4,
`
`QAMsignals. A quadrature amplitude-modulated (QAM)signal or a
`amplitude-shift-keying (QASK)signal is represented as
`Sm(t) ™ Ame 26 cos2mf,t — Ams - sin 2mrf,,t
`
`(4.1.31)
`
`(4.1.34) OGNtBal Wet SeDE ENEN PRN ED GeRAVEOrWe GoDE ONAN FEN 8 OOie PRES OE ee eTBeerney Nwsee we Se
`
`Sp(t) = An = cos ft
`where A,,, and A,,, are the information-bearing signal amplitudes of
` m=1,2,...,M,0<t<T (4.1.30)
`=A,,Re[u(t)e?']
`ture carriers and u(t) = ¥26/T, 0 <t < T. QAMsignals are two-
`signals and, hence, they are represented by the vectors
`wherethe signal amplitude A,, takes the discrete values (levels)
`Sin = (VFAmes VEAns)
`A, =2m-1-M m=1,2,...,M
`The distance between any pair of signal vectorsis
`Thesignal pulse u(t), as defined in (4.1.30) is rectangular,i.e.,
`u(t) = 26 O<t<T
`(4.1.32)
`dink =V[Sm — Sul”
`
`
`
`but other pulse shapes may be used to obtain a narrowersignal spectrum.
`Clearly, these signals are one-dimensional (N = 1) and, hence, are repre-
`sented by the scalar components
`Sm =AmVE m=1,2,...,M
`The distance between any pair of signals is
`
`(4.1.33)
`
`Amk = V(Smt — Sia)”
`
`= é|A,, — A,|
`
`= \é (Ame — Age)” + (Ams — Ags)?
`
`take the discrete values
`When the signal amplitudes
`m= 1,2,..., M}, the signal space diagram is rectangular as showni
`In this case the distance between adjacent points, i.e, the minimum
`dmin ™ 2vé.
`
`M-ary orthogonal signals. In Sec. 3.3.1 we indicated that multidim
`nals can be generated either by subdividing a timeinterval of duratic
`N distinct (nonoverlapping) time slots of duration At, or by sv
`
`Petitioner Sirius XM Radio Inc. - Ex. 1021, p. 7
`
`Petitioner Sirius XM Radio Inc. - Ex. 1021, p. 7
`
`

`

`DIGITAL COMMUNICATIONS
`
`MODULATION AND DEMODULATIONFOR THE ADDITIVE GAUSSIAN NOISE CHANNEL
`
`227
`
`1 the real-valued cross-correlation coefficients are
`
`2wvé
`2vé
`2vé
`2s
`
`aOO
`,
`3
`3 A(t)
`5,
`5
`6
`3;
`3, A(t)
`2
`M=2
`M=m4
`
`(4.1.26)
`
`Re (Pim) = COS aa (m-k)
`nce, the Euclidean distance between pairs ofsignals is
`dym = {26(1 — Re (Pen )] }'
`
`ave
`—_—eeiOrr
`= (rel — cos 47(m - w)}”
`Ss
`S,
`S;
`0
`S4
`Ss
`S6 Ai)
`M=6
`
`(4.1.34)
`
`(4.1.27)
`
`e minimum distance d,, corresponds to the case in which |m — k| = 1, ie.,
`acent signal phases. In this case
`
`27
`
`(4.1.28)
`dai, = 26(1 — cos a)
`The special case of four phase signals (M = 4) results in the signal vectors
`s,=(0,V)
`8; = (v8.0)
`sy = (0, -V8)
`(4.1.29)
`1 the signal space diagram shownin Fig. 4.1.3a. These signal vectors may also
`viewed as two pairs of orthogonalsignals, i.e., the pair of vectors (s,,$3) is
`hogonal to (s,,s,). On the other hand,the pair (s,,s,) is antipodal and sois
`pair (S,,8,). These four signals are called biorthogonal. The general class of
`rthogonal signals is considered below.
`
`ltiamplitude signals. Consider the M-ary PAMsignals
`Sm(t) = Am is cos 2af,.t
` m=1,2,...,M,0<1t<T (4.1.30)
`=A,,Re[u(t)e?%]
`ere the signal amplitude A,, takes the discrete values (levels)
`A, =2m-1-M m=1,2,...,M
`e signal pulse u(t), as defined in (4.1.30) is rectangular, i.e.,
`
`(4.1.31)
`
`2é
`(4.1.32)
`u(t) = V r O<t<T
`, other pulse shapes may be used to obtain a narrowersignal spectrum.
`Clearly, these signals are one-dimensional (N = 1) and, hence,are repre-
`ted by the scalar components
`Sm =AmVE m=1,2,...,M
`
`(4.1.33)
`
`FIGURE4.1.4
`Signal-space diagrams for M-ary PAM signals.
`
`Hence, the distance between a pair of adjacent signal points, i.e., the minimum
`distance,is
`
`(4.1.35)
`dain = 2VE
`Examples of signal space diagrams for M-ary PAM signals are shown in Fig.
`4.1.4,
`.
`
`QAMsignals. A quadrature amplitude-modulated (QAM)signal or a quadrature
`amplitude-shift-keying (QASK)signal is represented as
`Sm(t) ™ Ane ag cos 2mf,t — Ams\/ ae sin 27f,t
`(4.1.36)
`= Re[(Ame + JAms) u(t) e/2%*]
`where A,,, and A,,, are the information-bearing signal amplitudes of the quadra-
`ture carriers and u(t) = /26/T, 0 < t < T. QAMsignals are two-dimensional
`signals and, hence, they are represented by the vectors
`Sm ™ (VEA mer VEAms)
`The distance between any pair of signal vectorsis
`
`(4.1.37)
`
`VISm — s,|°
`Aink =
`k,m=1,2,...,M (4.1.38)
`= 8[(Ame — Ate)’ + (Ams — Aps)']
`When the signal amplitudes
`take the discrete values {2m-1-—M,
`m =1,2,..., M}, the signal space diagram is rectangular as shown in Fig, 4.1.5.
`In this case the distance between adjacent points, i.e., the minimum distance, is
`
`Petitioner Sirius XM Radio Inc. - Ex. 1021, p. 8
`
`

`

`
`
`A
`
`f(y
`
`AG)
`Ato Ss;
`
`Ne
`
`M=4
`
`FIGURE 4.1.9
`Signal-space diagrams for M-ary simplex signals.
`
`where c,,, = 0 or 1 for all m and j. Each componentof a code word is mapped
`into an elementary binary PSK waveform as follows:
`
`Cmj = 1 = Sqj(t) = Vr cos2aft O<t<T,
`
`26
`
`Cmj = 9 S_j(t) = —
`
`
`¢2é
`T.
`
`cos 2af,t
`
`O<r<T,
`
`(4.1.50)
`
`where T, = T/N and &, = &/N. Thus, the M code words {C,,} are mappedinto
`a set of M waveforms{s,,(t)}.
`
`Ao
`
`Att)
`
`Ss AYea
`
`0
`
`~
`
`5,
`
`A(t)
`
`s)
`
`N=3
`
`FIGURE 4.1.10
`Signal-space diagramsforsignals gen-
`erated from binary codes.
`
`
`The waveformscan be represented in vector form as
`
`Sin = (Sats Smas-+9s Smy)
`m= 1,2,...,M
`es, = t V@/N for all m and j. N is called the block length of the
`
`Beand it is also the dimension of the M waveforms.
`|. We notethat there are 2” possible waveformsthat can be constructed from
`BN possible binary code words. We may select a subset of M < 2% signal
`
`\
`ms for transmission of the information. We also observe that the 2”
`ible signal points correspondto thevertices of an N-dimensional hypercube
`Bite center at the origin. Figure 4.1.10 illustrates the signal points in N = 2
`
`if dimensions.
`» Bach of the M waveformshas energy &. Thecrosscorrelation between any
`p.of waveforms depends on how weselect the M waveforms from the 2%
`ble waveforms. This topic is treated in Chap.5. Clearly, any adjacent signal
`
`
`
`Petitioner Sirius XM Radio Inc. - Ex. 1021, p. 9
`
`Petitioner Sirius XM Radio Inc. - Ex. 1021, p. 9
`
`

`

`DIGITAL COMMUNICATIONS
`
`(4.2.31)
` m=1,2
`u(u,,) = Re(e*reut%)
`Let us limit our attention to one- and two-dimensional signals, e.g., antipodal
`and orthogonalsignals. Then, the signal vectors are represented as s, = (54), 512)
`and s, = (55), 52)) or by their equivalent lowpass complex-valued signal vectors
`uy = V2(sy; + fog) and uy = ¥2(sq + jsp).
`If we assume that the signal u, was transmitted, the received signalis
`r=ae/*y, +z
`(4.2.32)
`
`where z is the complex-valued gaussian noise component. By substituting for r in
`
`H(u,) = 2a&+ M,
`)
`(
`p.(u,) = 2a&p, + Ny,
`where N,,, = Re(u*z), m= 1,2. The statistical characteristics of the noise
`componentsare identical to those in (4.2.27). Hence, the probability of error is
`identical to the result given by (4.2.28).
`If the computation of the error probability is based on the real-valued
`signals {s,,, m = 1,2}, the two decision variables are
`(4.2.34)
`B(s,,) ="res, m=1,2
`Again, let the signal s, be transmitted so that r = as, + n where n is the noise
`
`4.2.33
`
`p(s,) =a&+s,en
`H(s2) = ap, + s,° 0
`
`4.2.35
`
`(
`
`P, = P[u(s2) > w(s,)]
`(4.2.36)
`= P[(s, — 8s.) *n< —aé&(1 — p,)]
`The gaussian noise variable y = (s, — s,) * nm has zero mean and variance
`, =
`E(y*?) =d3,N)/2
`(4.2.37)
`
`y= Ply < ~ag(i—o)] = Ply > “2
`= yete|
`wEN. |
`
`
`242
`0
`
`ad?
`
`245
`complex-valued signals. It is interesting to note that the probability of error P,
`given in (4.2.38) is expressed as
`
`where d,, is the distance of the two signals. Hence, we observe that an increase
`in the distance between the two signals reduces the probability of error.
`
`‘A
`
`“A
`
`1
`|
`|
`|
`|
`|
`
`T
`
`,
`
`|
`!
`|
`
`I
`2T
`
`(a)
`
`lu(r)|
`
`|
`
`:
`
`|
`
`|
`3T
`
`|
`!
`|
`|
`|
`\
`
`I
`|
`4T
`
`t
`
`|
`|
`
`5T
`
`Received signal
`
`Carrier
`Recovery
`
`
`
`
`Output
`
`_
`2q2
`
`P= erfcly “aNe |
`
`(4.2.39)
`
`to the result for the error probability derived above for MODULATION AND DEMODULATION FOR THE ADDITIVE GAUSSIAN NOISE CHANNEL
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Petitioner Sirius XM Radio Inc. - Ex. 1021, p. 10
`
`

`

`sequence
`
` 90°
`
`Agn
`
`Balanced
`modulator
`
`IGURE 4.2.10
`diagram of modulator for multiphase PSK.
`
`
`
`
`Mam which depend on the transmitted phase in each signaling interval. The
`otator for generating this PSK signalis shown in block diagram form in Fig.
`
`
`F
`The mapping or assignment of k information bits to the M = 2* possible
`
`phases may be done in a number of ways. The preferred assignmentis one in
`
`pwh ch adjacent phasesdiffer by one binary digit as illustrated in Fig, 4.2.11. This
`2 pping is called Gray encoding. It is important in the demodulation of the
`
`
`alg nal because the most likely errors caused by noise involve the erroneous
`pelection of an adjacent phase to the transmitted signal phase. In such a case
`
`only a single bit error occurs in the k-bit sequence.
`The general form of the optimum demodulator for detecting one of ™
`
`sion variables
`y,
`pr
`is one that computes the
`:
`’
`sly,
`se
`mals in an AWGNchannel, as derived previously,
`i
`ln = Re(e[7r(e)ur(t)exp {-i|Gx(m -1)+ a} a)
`:
`m=1,2,...,M (4.2.93
`{ nd selects the signal correspondingto the largest decision variable. We observ
`
`Pys 45
`erfc (/vk8/N)
`Thus, we have an upper bound on the probability of error for M-ary signal
`waveforms obtained from binary block codes. This topic will be discussed in
`Phase
`more detail in Chap.5.
`selector
`formation|(Acm» Asm)
`phase shifter
`4.2.6 Probability of Error for Multiphase Signals
`The signal waveforms considered in Secs. 4.2.2 through 4.2.5 shared the charac-
`teristic that, for a fixed information rate R, the channel bandwidth required to
`transmit the signals increases as the number M of waveforms is increased. In
`contrast, the multiphase signal waveforms considered in this section and the
`multiamplitude and QAM signals considered in the next two sections, have the
`characteristic that the channel bandwidth requirements for a fixed rate actually
`decrease with an increase in M. As shown below, the penalty in using such
`bandwidth-efficient waveformsis an increase in the SNR required to achieve a
`specified level of performance. In short, these bandwidth-efficient signal wave-
`forms are appropriate for channels having a large SNR.
`The general representation for a set of M-ary phase signal waveforms is
`Smit) = Re{u(t)exp[sare + a(m -1)+ a)|\
`m=1,2,...,M,0<t<T (4.2.88)
`where A is an arbitrary initial phase.Itseffectis to rotate the signal constellation.
`The pulse u(t) determines the spectral characteristics of the multiphase signal. If
`u(t) isa rectangular pulse of the form
`u(t)=\ a O<t<T
`(4.2.89)
`2é
`the signal waveforms may be expressed as
`S(t) =
`26 AmeCOS2Tfct — 28An sin2nf,t
`
`(4.2.90)
`
`where
`
`(4.2.91)
`Aon = 008|5p(m ~ 1) +a] m=1,2,....M
`(4.2.92)
`Agm = Sit [arm -1)+ a] m=1,2,....M
`This signaling method is called phase-shift keying (PSK). Thus, the signal
`given by (4.2.90) is viewed as two quadrature carriers with amplitudes A,,, and
`
`
`
`Petitioner Sirius XM Radio Inc. - Ex. 1021, p. 11
`ea
`
`Petitioner Sirius XM Radio Inc. - Ex. 1021, p. 11
`
`

`

`MODULATION AND DEMODULATION FOR THE ADDITIVE GAUSSIAN NOISE CHANNEL
`
`259
`
`Balanced
`
`Phase
`elector
`
`5
`
`sequence
`
`hifter
`Phase shifte
`
`Output
`to
`.
`transmitter
`
`Information|(Acm» Agm)
`
`DIGITAL COMMUNICATIONS
`
`Since each signal waveform conveys k bits of information and each
`‘orm hasenergy @,it follows that ¢ = ké,, where &,
`is the energy perbit.
`ermore, &, = &/N = ké,/N.Therefore, the union bound may be expressed
`ms of the SNRperbit as
`(4.2.87)
`P, < 45 1 orf (7,870)
`we have an upper bound on the probability of error for M-ary signal
`orms obtained from binary block codes. This topic will be discussed in
`
`
`
`Probability of Error for Multiphase Signals
`gnal waveforms considered in Secs. 4.2.2 through 4.2.5 shared the charac-
`¢ that, for a fixed information rate R, the channel bandwidth required to
`lit the signals increases as the number M of waveforms is increased. In
`st, the multiphase signal waveforms considered in this section and the
`mplitude and QAM signals considered in the next two sections, have the
`teristic that the channel bandwidth requirements for a fixed rate actually
`ise with an increase in M. As shown below, the penalty in using such
`idth-efficient waveformsis an increase in the SNR required to achieve a
`ed level of performance. In short, these bandwidth-efficient signal wave-
`are appropriate for channels having a large SNR.
`The general representation for a set of M-ary phase signal waveformsis
`-1(uan|ete» Sm)
`
`m=1,2,...,M,0<t<T (4.2.88)
`A is an arbitrary initial phase.Its effect is to rotate the signal constellation.
`se u(t) determines the spectral characteristics of the multiphase signal. If
`a rectangular pulse of the form
`
`u(t) = (+ O<r<T
`nal waveforms may be expressed as
`
`(4.2.89)
`
`Sm(t) = y 284,0082af,t - V 26Ans sin2af,t
`
`(4.2.90)
`
`j
`
`Aon = 00s |$7(m - 1) +A]
`
`n= 1,2,...,M
`
`(4.2.91)
`
`]
`
`:
`
`
`
`modulator
`
`
`Balanced
`modulator
`
`FIGURE 4.2.10
`Hlock diagram of modulator for multiphase PSK.
`
`A,m» Which depend on the transmitted phase in each signaling interval. The
`modulator for generating this PSK signal is shown in block diagram form in Fig.
`4.2.10.
`The mapping or assignment of k information bits to the M = 2‘ possible
`phases may be done in a number of ways. The preferred assignment is one in
`which adjacent phasesdiffer by one binary digit as illustrated in Fig. 4.2.11. This
`mapping is called Gray encoding. It is important in the demodulation of the
`signal because the most
`likely errors caused by noise involve the erroneous
`aclection of an adjacent phase to the transmitted signal phase. In such a case,
`only a single bit error occurs in the k-bit sequence.
`The general form of the optimum demodulator for detecting one of M
`signals in an AWGNchannel, as derived previously, is one that computes the
`decision variables
`
`Petitioner Sirius XM Radio Inc. - Ex. 1021, p. 12
`
`

`

`00
`
`110
`
`1
`
`000
`
`100
`
`M=4,2=0
`(a)
`
`M=8,X=0
`(c)
`
`011
`
`001
`
`01
`
`u
`
`00
`
`10
`
`010
`
`110
`
`000
`
`100
`
`M=4,r=17/4
`(b)
`
`101
`Wi
`M=8,r=7/8
`@)
`
`FIGURE4.2.11
`PSK signal constellations for M =4and M=8.
`
`that the exponential factor under the integral in (4.2.93) is independent of the
`variable of integration and, hence,
`it can be factored out. As a result,
`the
`optimum demodulator can be implemented as a single matched filter or cross
`correlator which computes the vector
`V= eMf'r(t)ur(s) dt
`(4.2.94)
`projects it onto the M unit vectors
`m=1,2,...,.M (4.2.95)
`= exo {iFF(m—- 0) +A}}
`and selects the signal corresponding to the largest value obtained by this
`projection. Thus
`U,, = Re(VV,*)
`m= 1,2,...,M
`(4.2.96)
`Figure 4.2.12 shows a block diagram of a demodulator for recovering the
`noise-corrupted signal components Agm and Ag,» from which the vector V is
`
`recovery
`
`phase shifter
`
`4.2.12
`diagram of demodulator for PSK signals.
`
`r(t) = aeu(t) + z(t)
`
`tution of (4.2.97) into (4.2.94) yields the vector V as
`
`V=208+N
`
`the noise component N is a complex-valued gaussian random vari
`
`gero mean and variance LE(\NI’) = 2E€N). Let V = X + jY, where
`
`
` Synchronizer
`[ Carrier 2
`
`
` 90°
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Bi.
`V," = a.m — J4sm 18 sin
`fmed. The projection of V onto the unit vectors
`
`Bemplished by the formation of
`the product U,, = Xa. + Yasy,
`
`m..., M. Equivalently the vector V can be followed by a phase detector w
`
`Mputes the phase of V, denoted by 9, and selects from the set {s,,,(¢)}
`
`having a phase closest to @.
`
`a Having described the form of the modulator and demodulator for M
`
`KK, we now evaluate the performance in termsof the probability of error
`WC N channel. In order to compute the average probability of error, we ass
`
`#,(¢) is transmitted. Then the received waveform is
`
`
`
`
`
`
`X =2a& + Re(N)
`
`Y =Im(N)
`
`BX and Y componentsarejointly gaussian random variables, with the |
`
`Petitioner Sirius XM Radio Inc. - Ex. 1021, p. 13
`
`Petitioner Sirius XM Radio Inc. - Ex. 1021, p. 13
`
`

`

`DIGITAL COMMUNICATIONS
`
`011
`
`010
`
`00
`
`110
`
`001
`
`000
`
`i11
`
`100
`
`M=8,=0
`
`(c)
`
`00
`
`011
`
`001
`
`o10
`
`110
`
`000
`
`100
`
`10
`
`lil
`10]
`M=8,r=2/8
`
`(d)
`
`PSK signal constellations for M = 4 and M = 8.
`
`
`
`
`
`fT
`
`0
`
`bstitution of (4.2.97) into (4.2.94) yields the vector V as
`V=20€+N
`
`(4.2.97)
`
`(4.2.98)
`
`biWDULATION AND DEMODULATION FOR THE ADDITIVE GAUSSIAN NOISE CHANNEL
`
`261
`
`
`
`
`
`Synchronizer
`
`Keceived
`signal
`
`recovery
`
`iw a
`
`
`
`; . Carrier .
`
`
`
`
`
`
`HN
`
`Saw
`
`g333° °=€ a5
`
`90°
`phase shifter
`
`Via
`Reference
`vectors
`
`WIGURE 4.2.12
`Wlock diagram of demodulator for PSK signals.
`
`
`
`
`formed. The projection of V onto the unit vectors Vl = Gem — J4sm is simply
`|
`- wcomplished by the formation of
`the product U,, = Xa,,, + Ya,,,. m=
`
`E 1,2,..., M. Equivalently the vector V can be followed by a phase detector which
`
`F gomputes the phase of V, denoted by @, andselects from the set {s,,(7)} that
`
`; signal having a phase closest to 0.
`
`Having described the form of the modulator and demodulator for M-ary
`
`that the exponential factor under the integral in (4.2.93) is independent of the j
`] PSK, we now evaluate the performancein terms of the probability of error in an
`
`variable of integration and, hence,
`it can be factored out. As a result,
`the 1
`AWGNchannel. In order to compute the average probability of error, we assume
`
`q that s,(¢) is transmitted. Then the received waveform is
`optimum demodulator can be implemented as a single matchedfilter or cross
`
`correlator which computes the vector
`
`r(t) = aeu(t) + z(t)
`3
`V= eltf r(t)u*(t) dt
`
`
`projects it onto the M unit vectors
`
`. 2
`’
`¥,, = exp {j|47(m 1) +a}! m=1,2,...,M (4.2.95)
`|
`
`ere the noise component N is a complex-valued gaussian random variable
`
`and selects the signal corresponding to the largest value obtained by this
`{
`th zeromean and variance 4E(|N|*) = 2@Np. Let V = X + jY, where
`
`Petitioner Sirius XM Radio Inc. - Ex. 1021, p. 14
`
`

`

`The phase of V, computed by the phase detector, is # = tan! Y/X. The
`probability density function of @ is obtained by a change in variables from X
`and Y to
`
`(4.2.101)
`
`(4.2.106) ee eeeee rN 8 kde UEae ee edeeeee
`p(@)
`
`FIGURE 4.2.13
`Probability density function p(@) for y = 1, 2, 4, 10.
`
`_
`2
`R=vx'+Y
`6=tan | Y/X
`This changein variables yields the joint probability density function
`
` r
`2
`2
`2
`2
`p (r
`)
`202 e
`, @)=
`—(7? + 40° &? — 4a€r cos 9)/26
`Integration of p(r, @) over the range of r yields p(@). Thatis,
`ao
`It
`p(9)=f p(x, 8) ar
`= wel + (Fry cos 80720"#aefis| (4.2.103)
`
`(
`
`0
`
`2
`
`T
`
`“—o
`
`42.102
`
`)
`
`where y = a6/N, is the SNR per symbol. Figure 4.2.13 illustrates p(@) for
`several values of y. It is observed that p(@) becomes narrower and more peaked
`about @ = 0 as y is increased.
`A decision error is madeif the noise causes the phaseto fall outside of the
`range —7/M < @ < 7/M.Thus
`(4.2.104)
`Py =i f%™ p(6)do
`—2/M
`In general, the integral of p(@) does not reduce to a simple form and must be
`evaluated numerically, except when M = 2 and M = 4.
`the
`For binary signaling, the PSK waveforms are antipodal and, hence,
`probability of error is given by (4.2.40). When M = 4, we have in effect two
`binary PSK signals in phase quadrature as indicated above. With coherent
`demodulation, there is no cross talk or interference between the signals on the
`two quadrature carriers and, hence,
`the bit error probability is identical
`to
`(4.2.40). Thatis,
`
`“3.14
`
`-2.51 -1.88 -1.26
`
`-063
`
`0.00
`
`0.63
`
`1.26
`
`1.88
`
`2.51
`
`where P, is the probability of a correct decision for the 2-bit symbol. The rest
`in (4.2,106) follows from the statistical independence of the noise on the quadr
`ture carriers. Therefore, the symbol error probability for M = 4 is
`
`P,=1-P,
`(4.2.105)
`P, = erfe(y¥s)
`= erfc (Vs) — lerfc (%)]
`where y, is the SNR per bit. On the other hand, the symbolerror probability for
`For M > 4, the symbol error probability P,, is obtained by numerica!
`M = 4is determined by noting that
`integrating (4.2.104). Figure 4.2.14 illustrates this error probability as a functi
`P, = (i ~ P,)”
`of the SNR per bit for M = 2, 4, 8, 16, and 32. The graphsclearly illustrate t
`penalty in SNR per bit as M is increased beyond M = 4. For example,
`= [1 - derfe(/%)]
`Py = 107°, the difference between M = 4 and M =8is approximately 4 d
`
`Petitioner Sirius XM Radio Inc. - Ex. 1021, p. 15
`
`Petitioner Sirius XM Radio Inc. - Ex. 1021, p. 15
`
`

`

`R= yxX?+Y?
`6 =tan-'Y/X
`changein variablesyields the joint probability density function
`r
`2
`2
`g2
`2
`
`p(r,8)
`=36
`@)=
`—(r? +407 &*—4aércos @)/20
`sration of p(r, 6) over the range of r yields p(@). Thatis,
`p(8)=f p(r,8) ar
`e) + fary £05 8etofVycos6,32/2 ax|
`(4.2.103)
`
`T
`
`“—-©
`
`is the SNR per symbol. Figure 4.2.13 illustrates p(@) for
`ral values of y. It is observed that p(@) becomes narrower and more peaked
`it 6 = 0 as y is increased.
`A decision error is madeif the noise causes the phase to fall outside of the
`ee —7/M <6 < 27/M.Thus
`(4.2.104)
`Py=1- re" p(0) 40
`—a/M
`eneral, the integral of p(@) does not reduce to a simple form and must be
`uated numerically, except when M = 2 and M = 4.
`For binary signaling, the PSK waveforms are antipodal and, hence, the
`sability of error is given by (4.2.40). When M = 4, we have in effect two
`ry PSK signals in phase quadrature as indicated above. With coherent
`\odulation, there is no cross talk or interference between the signals on the
`quadrature carriers and, hence,
`the bit error probability is identical
`to
`
`P, = herfe(/7,|
`
`(4.2.105)
`
`-3.14 -2.51 -1.88 -1.26 -0.63
`
`aa
`0.63
`
`a
`0.00
`8
`
`1.26
`
`1.88
`
`2.51
`
`3.14
`
`FIGURE 4.2.13
`
`Probability density function p(@) for y = 1, 2, 4, 10.
`
`where P, is the

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket