throbber
Application No. 14/515,857
`
`DocketNo.: 241957.000508
`(TRACK 1)
`
`Docket No.: 241957.000508
`(PATENT)(TRACK 1)
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`In re Patent Application of:
`WiHiam H. McKenna et aL
`
`Application No.: 14i515,857
`
`Filed: October 16, 2014
`
`Customer No. 06980
`
`Confirmation No.: 6255
`
`Art Unit: 1613
`
`For; TAMPER RESIST ANT DOSAGE FORMS
`
`Examiner: AKHOON, Kauser M.
`
`DE CLARA. TION OF' RIClli\.RD 0. MANl"'ION UNDER 37 C.F.R. § 1.132
`
`1.
`I, Richard 0. Mannion, am a citizen of the United States and ram more than twenty-one
`(21) years of age.
`
`All statements made herein of my own knowledge are true, and all statements made herein
`2.
`on information and belief are believed to be true.
`
`Jam an employee and Executive Director ofPhannaceutical & Analytical Development at
`3.
`Purdue Ph anna L.P ., which is the assignee of this application. I am a co-inventor .ofthis patent
`application. l receive a salary, bonus and benefits from Purdue Pharma LP. ln my position at
`Purdue, my goals include initiating and supporting JP fil·ings.
`
`I make this declaration in support of the patentability of the above-identified patent
`4.
`application.
`
`Each pending claim of this application provides a dosage form (tablets) having at least (1)
`5.
`an opioid or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof (such as bydrocodone bitartrate); (2) at
`least one lovv molecular weight polyethylene oxide having, based on rheological measurements,
`
`-1-
`
`KASHIV1036
`IPR of Patent No. 9,492,392
`
`

`

`Application No. 14/515,857
`
`Docket No.: 24!957.000508
`(Tiv\CK 1)
`
`an approximate molecular weight of less than 1,000,000 (sqch as a PEO having a molecular
`weight of 600,000); and (3) at least one high molecular weight polyethylene oxide having, based
`on rheological measurements, an approximate molecular weight of 7,000,000. Each such tablet is
`a cured tablet, and is cured at a temperature from about 60 to about 90 oc for about 15 minutes to
`about 10 hours. Each cured tablet has at least 79% by weight, based upon the total weight of said
`composition, ofthe total combined weight ofthe high and low molecular weight polyethylene
`oxides. The experiment described below \Vas conducted using tablets having these features.
`Consequently, the samples in the experiment are tablets of the invention clain:1ed in this
`application.
`
`The density of uncured and cured hydrocodone tablets was determined under my direction.
`6.
`These tablets contained hydrocodone salt; low molecular w·eight polyethylene oxide ("PEO")
`having, based on rheological measurements, an average molecular weight of 600;000; and high
`molecular weight PEO having, based on rheological measurements, an average molecular weight
`of 7 ,000~000. The tablets contained either 20 mg or 120 mg ofhydrocodone bitartrate.
`
`The 20 mg tablets contained 40% by weight, based upon total weight of the tablet absent
`7.
`cosmetic coating, of the low molecular weight PEO and 56~·'0 by weight, based upon total weight
`of the tablet absent cosmetic coating, of the high molecular weight PEO, which means that the 20
`mg tablets contained 96% total combined weight, based upon total \veight of the tablet absent
`cosmetic coating, of high and low molecular weight PEO.
`
`The J 20 mg tablets contained 27% by vveight, based upon total weight of the tablet absent
`8.
`cosmetic coating, of the low molecular weight PEO and 53% by weight, based upon total weight
`of the tablet absent cosmetic coating, ofthe high molecular weight PEO, which means that the
`120 mg tablets contained 80% total combined weight, based upon total weight of the tablet absent
`cosmetic coating, of high and low molecular weight PEO.
`
`The density ofthe tablets w-as determined by Archimedes' principle using hexane, a liquid
`9.
`of known density. The tablet was first weighed in air, and then was immersed in hexane and
`weighed. From these two weights, the density of the tablet p was determined as follows:
`
`-2-
`
`KASHIV1036
`IPR of Patent No. 9,492,392
`
`

`

`Application No. 14/515,857
`
`Docket No.: 241957.000508
`(IRACK 1)
`
`A
`p=--·po
`A·--·11
`
`P:
`A:
`B:
`p0:
`
`Density of the tablet
`Weight of the tablet in air
`Weight of the tablet when immersed in the liquid
`Density ofthe liquid at a given temperature.
`
`The equipment used was a Top-loading Mettler Toledo balance Model # AE50/M87731
`l 0.
`Serial #30000832, a glass beaker, and a thetmorneter.
`
`The materials used were (a) hexane (the density of Hexane at 20°C ''" 0.660 g/ml); (b)
`1 L
`uncured 20 mg hydrocodone bitartrate tablets as described above (Batch No. XWSF90); (c)
`uncured 120 rng hydrocodone bitartrate tablets as described above (Batch No. XWSGOO); and (d)
`cured and cosmetically coated 20 rng and 120 mg tablets (Lot Nos. 2141-001, 2141-006, 2141-
`011, 2141-0 16; 2141-021, 2141-026, 2141-031, 2141-036).
`
`12.
`
`The procedure used was as follows:
`a.
`Set up Mettler Toledo balance with Mettler Density Determination Kit No. 33360.
`b.
`Fill an appropriate sized beaker with hexane.
`c.
`Weigh the tablet in air andrecord the weight as Weight A.
`d.
`Transfer the same tablet onto the lower coil within the beaker filled with hexane.
`e.
`Determine the weight ofthe tablet in liquid and record the vveight as Weight H.
`f
`Perform the density calculation as above and record the density.
`
`Three tabiets of each type were measured thr density. The average of each set of three
`13.
`tablets is reported in the Tables below.
`
`Table 1. Density ofHYD 20mg Tablet Before and After Curing at 70°Cil5min
`!}'(! Density Change After
`Uncured Tablet Density
`Cured and Coated Tablet
`Curino-b
`_____ Q~I1~~i~~_(g£~m3)
`~f£~~~13.)
`---
`1.158
`1.073
`-7.4
`
`~~~~--·
`
`KASHIV1036
`IPR of Patent No. 9,492,392
`
`

`

`Application No. 14/515,857
`
`Docket No.: 24!957.000508
`(TI0\CK 1)
`
`Table 2. Density ofHYD 20mg Tab1et Before and After Curing at 70°C/45min.
`
`u~:~~ti~e~i~~~~~~;-r>~~;sity ________ ------cli~~~~~~~~~~~~~~1~;.-i1i~i:-----r-----o;~--ne_P:_~i--~-~l_S_-~_,~"-~g---~----A_----_:r_i~_-i:·_---""'---
`L
`
`-6.2
`l.1ss
`1.087
`-·····-·········-·--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
`
`Table 3. Density ofHYD 20mg Tablet Before and After Curing at 78°C/15min
`, ......................................................................... , ......................................................................... , ......................................................................... 1
`! Uncured Tablet Density
`! % Density Change Atler
`! Cured and Coated Tablet
`!
`i
`I
`Density (g/cm3)
`!
`(g/cm3)
`Curing -
`1.1ss
`1.089
`-6.o
`1
`1
`!. .................................................................................................................................... ______________ -----------------------------------------------------------------------J
`
`Table 4. Density ofHYD 20mg Tablet Bethre and After Curing at 78°C/45min
`~ nc-ii'r~ct--1~~-b'i~t'-15~;-;Tty ____ ---··c;-~:~·d";.·;-cTc;~~tici--f~b'i~t------· ----·--%;·15'~~sity-·c:·h·~;ge -i\'ti:~~--
`Density (g/cm3)
`(g!cm3)
`Curing
`L 158
`1.089
`-6.0
`
`Table 5. Density of HYD 120mg Tablet Be.tore and After Curing at 70°C/15min
`I Cured and Coated Tablet
`l
`- Uncureti Tablet Density
`l% Density Change A.fter
`I
`I
`I
`3
`1
`:
`(g/cm·)
`:
`Density (g/cm )
`Curing
`r-----------------------------------:----------------------------r---------------------------------------------------------------,--------------------------------------------------------------:
`I
`I
`I
`1.100
`1.177
`-6,5
`------------~~------------
`--~
`
`1 1'
`
`
`
`'
`
`'I
`
`r-
`
`Table 6. Density ofHYD 120mg Tablet Before and After Curing at 70°C/45m1n
`! Uncured Tablet Density
`Cured and Coated Tablet
`%Density Change After
`I
`(g/cm3
`Density (g/cm3
`Curing
`)
`)
`J
`1------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------:--------------------------------·-,
`1.177
`Lll2
`-5.5
`!
`i
`
`!
`
`!
`!
`
`Table 7. Density ofHYD 120mg Tablet Before and After Curing at 78°Cil5min
`Uncured Tablet Density
`Cured and Coated Tablet
`%Density Change After
`___________________________ (WS!!!~L ......................... ________________ Q_~~~-!,~ __ (g{~!!~-~-L.............. -----·····-··------------~:Y!!.~K .............. __________ _
`1.177
`Ll 02
`-6.4
`
`Table 8. Density ofHYD 120mg Tablet Before and After Curing at 78°C/4-5min
`~--'0 Density Change After
`Uncured Tablet Density
`Cured and Coated Tablet
`(g/cm3
`Density (g/cm3)
`C~u~ing
`)
`···---------------
`-5A
`1.177
`1.113
`----------------------
`
`i
`I
`
`-4-
`
`KASHIV1036
`IPR of Patent No. 9,492,392
`
`

`

`ApplicationNo. 14/515,857
`
`Docket No.: 241957.000508
`(TRACK 1)
`
`The densities ofail ofthe cured tablets were 1owerthan the densities ofthe corresponding
`14.
`uncured tablets.
`
`I have been warned and acknowledge that \ViHful false statements and the like made by me are
`punishable by fine or imprisonment, or both ~- U.S.C. 1 001) and may jeopardize the validity of
`the above-identified application or any patent issuing thereon.
`
`I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America thatthe
`foregoing is true and correct.
`
`Executed on March 27,2015.
`
`Richard 0. Mannion
`
`-5-
`
`KASHIV1036
`IPR of Patent No. 9,492,392
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket