throbber
26-NAY-1995 BLDscsosroN SPA
`DRUG DEVE OPNENT AND INOUST
`LS23 ?8Q
`RIAL PHARMifC'r'
`
`PB
`
`Zl
`
`f'JART 12
`
`111
`6-
`
`Drug Regulatory Affairs
`
`Formulation Including
`Pharmacokinetic Aspr
`~-~
`International Pharma~t?uticallssues
`Good Manufacturing Practice
`
`Quality Control
`
`VOLUME 21
`
`NUMBER 12
`
`1995
`
`Supplied by the British Library 06 Feb 2018, 14:06 (GMT)
`
`KASHIV1028
`IPR of Patent No. 9,492,392
`
`

`

`DRUG DEVELOPM ·NT AND INDUSTRIAL PHARMACY, 21(12), 1411-1428 (1995)
`
`APPLICATION OF POLY(OXYETHYLENE)
`HOMOPOLYMERS IN SUSTAINED RELEASE SOLID
`FORMULATIONS
`
`Atttollio Moront and l aac Ghebre-Sellassie
`
`Parke-Davis Phannaceutical Research,
`Warner-Lambert Company, Morris Plains, NJ 07950 U.SA.
`
`ABSTRACT
`
`Water oJuble poly( oxyethylene) homopolymers, with molecular mass
`ranging from four hundred thou and to four million, were used as carriers
`to generate, by direct compression techniques. sustained release matrix
`tablet of hoth water-soluhl and in. oluble bioactive agents. Dissolution
`howed that the release kinetic of the tablets depends upon the
`studie
`solubility and molecular mas of polymer, solubility of drug, and the ratio of
`the drug to polymer in the tablets. Following drug release, the tablet
`component di solved lt!aving behind no residue, or "ghost", as is commonly
`observed with wax-ha ed . ystem ..
`
`• Currently nflilimed with The Quantum Group, Inc., 2103 Red Forest Road, Greensboro,
`N.C., ~7410.
`
`Copyright <0 1995 by Marcel Dekker, Inc.
`
`1411
`
`Supplied by the British Library 06 Feb 2018, 14:06 (GMT)
`
`KASHIV1028
`IPR of Patent No. 9,492,392
`
`

`

`1412
`
`MORONI AND GHEBRE-SELLASSIE
`
`INTRODUCTION
`
`Owing to the worldwide:: decline in the number of pharmacologically active
`new chemical entities reaching the marketplace, interest in the
`development of n w drug delivery systems, particularly in the area of
`controlled release, ha been on the forefront of pharmaceutical research
`(1). Thi i h cause a well·designed dosage form may not only improve the
`efficacy and safety of the active ingredient, but also can help to extend the
`patent life and hence the profitability derived from the marketed products.
`
`Over the years dif~ rent type of controlled release dosage forms, including
`matrix ystems have been developed (2, 3). Fabrication of matrix type oral
`dosage forms generally involves direct compression of tablet excipients, or
`preparation of aqueou , olvent or wax-based granulations whkh are
`subsequently compres ed to provide tablets of different izes and shapes.
`These systems are capable of sustaining the release of drugs over an
`extended period of time and are not susceptible to dose dumping. Most of
`these, however, leave behind, following drug release, tablet residues or
`"ghosts" which can cast doubt in the patient's mind regarding the
`performance of the dosage form. Ideally, therefore, the tablets should
`contain a carrier or binder that dissolves in body fluids once it delivers the
`active agent as intended. In these systems, the carrier on the surface of the
`tablet initially hydrates during dissolution, to generate an outer viscous gel
`layer ( 4). This phase is then followed ·equentially by tablet bulk hydration,
`swelling and erosion. The overall di solution rate and, ultimately, drug
`availability are controlled by the rate of swelling, diffusion through the gel
`layer (5,6) anti/or erosion (7, X, 9).
`
`Recent work with poly(ethylen oxide) homopolymers (10 ll),(supplied hy
`Union Carbide under the trade name of "Polyox .. (12)), indicated that
`tablets containing the e polymers a carriers do not only have sustained
`release properties hut they also do not leave residues following drug
`relea e. These polymers are, therefore, suitable for the development of
`controlled release tahl ts. The homopolymer are prepared by anionic
`polymerization of ethylene oxide and have an average molecular mass
`ranging from one hundred thousand to eight million. As polyethers, the
`polymeric chain are apable of forming strong hydrogen bonds with water,
`a property that is rc ponsible for their high water uptake and eventual
`dissolution. Because these polymers hydrate. swell and eventually erode
`during the di solution course the mechanism of release is a complex
`process involving drug diffusion, polymer swelling and/or erosion. The
`
`Supplied by the British Library 06 Feb 2018, 14:06 (GMT)
`
`KASHIV1028
`IPR of Patent No. 9,492,392
`
`

`

`POL Y(OXYETHYLENE) HOMOPOL YMERS
`
`l413
`
`dominance of one mechanism over the others depends upon tablet
`excipients and solubility of the active ingredient.
`
`The objective of this tudy is, therefore, to describe and characterize the
`release kinetics in aqueous media of tablets containing poly(oxyethylene) as
`the rate controlling carrier and model drugs that are either highly water-
`soluble or poorly water soluble.
`
`THEORETICAL CONSIDERATIONS
`
`Four main mechanisms of release are possible from monolithic tablets
`containing an uniformly distributed load of drug. The first and most often
`encountered mechanism is drug diffusion through the outside layers of the
`tablet, al o known a "Ficknian" release, or ''Case I" mechanism ( 4). The
`release rate of monolithic tablets containing a water insoluble carrier and a
`water oluble drug decreases as a function of time, because the diffusional
`path length for drug relea e increases with time, as the solvent front moves
`toward the center of the tablet. The release kinetic foUows the square
`root of time up to 60 % drug depletion ( 13, 14) a de cribed in equation
`(1 ):
`
`(1) MJMoo = (A(D C, (2Cd- C.)])112 t112
`where A is the tablet surface area D i the drug diffusivity, c. is the drug
`solubility in the dis olution medium and cd is the drug loading
`concentration in the matrix. This relation holds true until drug depletion or
`tablet erosion cause, respectively a negative or positive deviation from the
`square-root of time dependance ( 15).
`
`The . econd ca. e, where drug release i swelling controUed, is known as
`"zero order" release or 11Case II" mechanism ( 4). In thi case, the following
`equation can successfully describe the fraction of drug released:
`
`where r is the radius of sphere or cylinder or half thickness of a slab,
`is
`the ero~ion constant, Cu the uniform initial drug concentration, and n an
`exponent depending on the geometry of the release device, and which is 3,
`2 or 1 in the case of a sphere cylinder or infinite slab, respectively (11).
`
`Supplied by the British Library 06 Feb 2018, 14:06 (GMT)
`
`KASHIV1028
`IPR of Patent No. 9,492,392
`
`

`

`1414
`
`MORONI AND GHEBRE-SELLASSIE
`
`In the case of an infinite slab where the surface does not change with
`time, n = 1 and (2) • implifies as follows:
`
`(3)
`
`MJMoo = ko t I Co r
`
`In this case, the release rate is independent of time and follows the "zero
`order" kinetics. In practice, this ideal situation has never been obsetved.
`A third mechanism of release involves devices made from water soluble or
`swellable polymer , where drug diffusion and tablet swelling occur
`concurrently. This mechanism has heen described as "non- Ficknian"
`transport and the release is controlled both by swelling and diffusion (8).
`
`The release rate may he described by a combined t1n I zero order kinetics,
`as shown by equation (4):
`
`where k1 and k2 are two phenomenological constant describing respectively
`the square root of time dependent release and the time independent
`release. The use of two independent constants k1 and k2 allows the
`quantitative evaluation of the contribution of Ficknian or non-Ficknian
`release to the overall rate of release.
`
`A fourth mechanism of drug release from soluble matrices is erosion.
`During dissolution, the outer gel layer fully hydrates, swells and erodes.
`The sequential steps of wetting, hydration, swelling, and erosion continue
`throughout the dis olution course until the water-soluble components of the
`tablets dis olve completely.
`
`Mathematical expres ions describing the release rates of solely erodible
`systems are usually quite involved and may be written only if the
`solubilization kinetic of the polymer are known (7). This mechanism of
`release is described as "Super Case II" (16) and often fol1ows a super-linear
`kinetic of release as described hy equation (5):
`
`where m may he equal or greater than 1 and depends on the relative rates
`of tablet t!ro ·ion and tablet swelling.
`
`In some cases, the release kinetics may approach zero order if the rate of
`solvent front advancing toward the tablet core and the rate of surface
`
`Supplied by the British Library 06 Feb 2018, 14:06 (GMT)
`
`KASHIV1028
`IPR of Patent No. 9,492,392
`
`

`

`POL Y(OXYETHYLENE) HOMOPOL YMERS
`
`1415
`
`ero ion are comparable and occur at the same time (17, 18). Under such
`conditions, the drug diffusive path length will approximately remain
`constant and, assuming no surface area changes, provide zero order release
`kinetics. Since tablets containing water-soluble polymers also swell and
`erode, it is possible to assume that the total tablet area will remain
`constant for most of the dissolution course.
`
`EXPERIMENTAL
`
`Materials
`Polyox polymer (Union Carbide, Danbury, Cf, M. M. (Average) =
`4,000 000, 2,000,000 and 400,000), diphenhydramine hydrochloride (Parke
`Davis Holland, Ml), Cl-936 (diphenylethyl(adenosine), Parke-Davis, Ann
`Arbor, MI), and magnesium stearate (Witco) were used as received.
`
`Polymer Characterization
`Poly( oxyethylene) polymers were characterized by viscosity measurement
`u jng a Brookfield viscometer according to the procedure described in the
`manufacturer technical bulletin (11). Values obtained for each grade were
`within pecifications.
`
`Tablet Compression
`The carrier and the active ingredient were first blended in different ratios.
`After the addition of a lubricant, the final blend was compressed into
`tablets using a single punch Stokes E tablet machine and standard concave
`(3/8") tooling.
`
`Dis olution
`Dis ·olution studies were conducted using USP Apparatus II (paddles), at a
`rotation speed of 75 r.p.m. The dissolution medium for diphenhydramine
`hydrochloride tablets was water while 0.1 N hydrochloric acid was used for
`CJ-936, an experimental drug with poor water solubility. Samples were
`withdrawn automatically at preset time intervals and analyzed
`spectrophotometrically.
`
`R ULTS AND DISCU
`
`Consistent with the properties of water-solub!e, high molecular mass
`polymers poly(oxyethylene) polymers di solve slowly to generate highly
`
`Supplied by the British Library 06 Feb 2018, 14:06 (GMT)
`
`KASHIV1028
`IPR of Patent No. 9,492,392
`
`

`

`t _
`~- ;
`
`1416
`
`MORONI AND GHEBRE-SELLASSIE
`
`viscous solutions ( 12). It is these characteristics that make them suitable for
`the development of controlled-release solid dosage forms. During
`dissolution, tablets containing these polymers produce a gel layer on the
`surface and swell upon contact with the dissolution media. The thickness
`of the gel layer controls drug release. The thickness of the gel changes
`depending on the rate of solvent front progress toward the inside of the
`tablet, the degree of swelling, and on the erosion rate of the tablet outer
`layers. The rate of the solvent front advancement is controlled by drug
`properties, a well as the relative amounts of the drug and polymer in the
`tablet formulation. The rate of erosion of the outer layers i also
`controlled by factors such as solubility of drug and polymer, the
`drug/polymer ratio and polymer average molecular mass. Therefore during
`dissolution, the gel layer thickness may increase, decrease, or remain
`constant as a function of time, thereby modifying the release rate
`accordingly.
`
`Water Soluble Dru~
`The release of diphenhydramine hydrochloride a highly water soluble drug
`( solubility > 1 g/ml ), from tablets containing poly( oxyethylene)
`homopolymers as carriers appears to be controlled, after a brief induction
`time, by a contribution of drug diffusion, through the outer hydrated layers
`of the poly( oxyethylene) matrix, and surface erosion. Following the
`induction time, the release kinetics approximate the square root of time
`with a positive deviation from linearity toward the end of the dis elution
`course (Figs. 1-3). This deviation becomes more pronounced as the
`average molecular mass of the polymer decrea es. A probable cause of the
`positive deviation may be the disintegration and subsequent dissolution of
`the release modulating gel layer. While poly( oxyethylene) homopolymer
`are water soluble, they erode very slowly during the early part of the
`dissolution course. This is probably because diphenhydramine hydrochloride
`locally produces a high ionic concentration in the hydrated layer of the
`tablet and delays polymer dissolution until most of the drug is depleted.
`Examination of the tablets made from the two higher average molecular
`mass polymers shows that, during dissolution, they swell but do not appear
`to erode substantially until most of the drug is released. The overall
`release rates of the tablets decreased with an increase in polymer fraction
`irrespective of the polymer molecular mas es.
`
`Furthermore, tablets containing a very high drug content (9: I) relative to
`the polymers of the three different average molecular masses rdease the
`drug at fast rates and show marked positive deviations from lineadty. The
`
`Supplied by the British Library 06 Feb 2018, 14:06 (GMT)
`
`KASHIV1028
`IPR of Patent No. 9,492,392
`
`

`

`POLY(OXYETHYLENE) HOMOPOLYMERS
`
`1417
`
`120
`
`100
`
`80
`
`v
`
`D D
`0
`
`0
`
`0
`
`"'0
`Q)
`en
`~
`Q)
`Q)
`~
`
`60
`
`OJ
`::J
`~ "0
`~ 40
`
`20
`
`0
`
`0
`
`4
`
`B
`
`20
`16
`12
`v'Time (min. 1/2)
`
`~ Drug/Polymer 9/1
`<> Drug/Polymer 4/1
`tJ. Drug/Polymer 7/3
`o Drug/Polymer 1/1
`o Drug/Polymer 317
`24
`28
`
`FIGURE 1.
`Release Profiles of Diphenhydramine HCI / Poly(oxyethylene)
`4 Million Average Molecular Mass Tablets in Water.
`USP II (paddles), 75 rpm, 37" C.
`Symbols: Experimental Points. Line: Model.
`
`limited amount of polymer in the formulation cannot generate a firm gel,
`and promote erosion for an extended period of time.
`
`The overall release rate of diphenhydramine hydrochloride was also found
`to depend upon the molecular mass of the polymer in the tablet
`formulation. As expected as the average molecular mass of the polymer
`is increased, the release rates decreased proportionately.
`
`Since tablets containig the highly water soluble diphenhydramine
`hydrochloride, hydrate, swell and erode, the release rates are controlled
`simultaneously by diffusion and erosion. A!i a result, the release kinetics of
`diphenhydramine hydrochloride from poly(oxyethylene) based tablets
`follows a mixed zero/one-half order as described by eyuation ( 4) where the
`zero order relea e mechanism contributes sub tantially to the total release,
`
`Supplied by the British Library 06 Feb 2018, 14:06 (GMT)
`
`KASHIV1028
`IPR of Patent No. 9,492,392
`
`

`

`1418
`
`MORONI AND GHEBRE-SELLASSIE
`
`120
`
`100
`
`80
`
`0
`
`0 0
`
`"0
`cu
`f/)
`tO
`Q)
`Q)
`
`60
`
`...
`Cl
`::I L..
`"0
`~ 40
`
`20
`
`0
`
`0
`
`4
`
`8
`
`12
`V Time
`
`20
`16
`<min. 1/2)
`
`v Drug/Polymer 9/1
`o Drug/Polymer 4/1
`t. Drug/Polymer 7/3
`o Drug/Polymer 111
`o Drug/Polymer 3/7
`24
`28
`
`FIGURE 2.
`Release Profiles of Diphenhydramine HCI / Poly(oxyethylene)
`2 Million Average Molecular Mass Tablets in Water.
`USP II (paddles), 75 rpm, 37° C.
`Symbols: Experimental Points. Line: Model.
`
`especially at high drug/polymer ratios and using poly( oxyethyJene) of low
`molecular mass, which dissolves faster than the other two grades.
`
`The release con tants k1 (min:112, diffusion control) and k2 (min:• ,ero ion
`control) are given in Table 1-3. The values were calculated by fitting the
`experimental data, between of 10 and 70 % of drug release, for tablets
`based on poly( oxyethylene) 2 ans 4 million average molecular mass, and
`between 5 and 70 % for poly(oxyethylene) 400,000, to a non-linear
`regression based on equation ( 4).
`
`The results obtained show that diffusion controlled release rate constant k1
`decreases with decrease in drug/polymer ratio to a limiting value which it is
`independent of the polymer molecular mas (Fig. 4).
`
`Supplied by the British Library 06 Feb 2018, 14:06 (GMT)
`
`KASHIV1028
`IPR of Patent No. 9,492,392
`
`

`

`POLY(OXYETHYLENE) HOMOPOLYMERS
`
`1419
`
`120
`
`100
`
`0
`
`0
`
`80
`
`"0
`Q)
`(/)
`10
`G)
`-a;
`'-
`0>
`.:::J
`'-
`"0
`~ 40
`
`60
`
`20
`
`0
`
`0
`
`4
`
`8
`
`12
`16
`1/Time <min. 1/2)
`
`"l Drug/Polymor 9/1
`o Drug/Polymer 4/1
`tJ. Drug/Polymer 7/3
`o Drug/Polymer 111
`o Drug/Polymer 3/7
`24
`28
`20
`
`FIGURE 3.
`Release Profiles of Diphenhydramine HCI/ Poly(oxyethylene)
`400,000 Average Molecular Mass Tablets in Water.
`USP II lpaddlesl. 75 rpm, 37" C.
`Symbols: Experimental Points. Line: Model.
`
`TABLE 1.
`Dissolution Rate Con. tants for Diphenhydramine Hydrochloride/
`Poly(oxyethylene) Four Million Tablets.
`k.
`
`Drug/Polymer
`
`k2
`
`Correlation
`Coefficient
`
`9/1
`4/1
`7/3
`1/1
`3/7
`
`.03040
`.02915
`.02 47
`.02544
`.02462
`
`.001002
`.000709
`.000510
`.000379
`.000275
`
`.9997
`.9999
`.9999
`.99
`.9984
`
`Supplied by the British Library 06 Feb 2018, 14:06 (GMT)
`
`KASHIV1028
`IPR of Patent No. 9,492,392
`
`

`

`1420
`
`MORONI AND GHEBRE-SELLASSIE
`
`TABLE 2.
`Di solution Rate Constants for Diphenhydramine Hydrochloride/
`Poly(oK}'ethylene) Two Million Tablets.
`k.
`
`Drug/Polymer
`
`k2
`
`Correlation
`Coefficient
`
`9/1
`4/ 1
`
`7/3
`
`1/1
`3/7
`
`.03332
`.02970
`.02927
`.026783
`.02511
`
`.002063
`.001264
`.000831
`.000508
`.000415
`
`.9998
`.9998
`.9999
`.9998
`.9997
`
`TABLE 3.
`Dissolution Rate Constants for Diphenhydramine Hydrochloride/
`Poly( OK}'ethylene) 400,000 Tablets.
`k.
`
`k2
`
`Correlation
`Coefficient
`
`Drug/Polymer
`
`9/1
`4/1
`
`7/3
`J/1
`Jn
`
`.05765
`.04258
`
`.02912
`.02744
`
`.02461
`
`.00574
`.00374
`
`.00196
`.00129
`
`.00068
`
`.9994
`.9997
`
`.9994
`.9998
`.9998
`
`Polymers with high average molecular masses have a high number of chain
`entanglement or crystallites per unit volume which reduce the permeation
`rate of the dissolution medium through the tablets and the subsequent
`diffu ·ion of the drug molecules through the gel layer. Con equently, the
`average path length that drug molecules traverse before they are relea ed
`becomes both longer and more tortuou as polymer average molecular
`mass increases.
`
`Supplied by the British Library 06 Feb 2018, 14:06 (GMT)
`
`KASHIV1028
`IPR of Patent No. 9,492,392
`
`

`

`POL Y(OXYETHYLENE) HOMOPOL YMERS
`
`1421
`
`0.08
`
`0.06
`
`.......
`
`I
`c:
`
`C\1 ' ,.....
`.E -,.....
`
`.X
`
`0.04
`
`0.02
`
`!
`I
`
`400,000
`A
`2 miiUon
`o
`4 mil6on
`o
`0.00 +---- -.----- r------.----"""-T-
`- ----.
`0
`2
`4
`6
`8
`10
`Drug I Polymer Ratio
`
`FIGURE 4.
`Release Constant k1 as a Function of Drug to Polymer Ratio
`and Polymer Average Molecular Mass from Tablets
`Containing Diphenhydramine HCI and Poly(oxyethylene).
`95 % Confidence Interval.
`
`At low drug to polymer ratios, the polymer fraction is so high that it will
`not allow the formations of preferential channels in the matrix trough
`which the drug can he rete ed. Furthermore, the polymeric chains are
`completely entangled, regardless of their length, and drug can only be
`relea ed hy diffusion through them, thu explaining the similarities in k1
`values.
`
`O n the other hand, at higher drug/polymer ratios preferential drug release
`channels can he formed and also the level chains entanglement becomes
`dependent on average chain lenght so that diffusional release rates become
`dependent on polymer molecular mass.
`
`Ero ion controlled release rate constant k1 (Fig. 5) increases with increase
`in drug/polymer ratio; it also decrea es a polymer average molecular mass
`
`Supplied by the British Library 06 Feb 2018, 14:06 (GMT)
`
`KASHIV1028
`IPR of Patent No. 9,492,392
`
`

`

`1422
`
`MORONl AND GHEBRE-SELLASSIE
`
`r=--
`
`0.008
`
`0.006
`
`0_004
`
`-~ I
`
`.&
`E
`.......
`C\1
`~
`
`I
`
`0.002 I
`1
`l~
`
`0 .000
`
`0
`
`4
`
`8
`Drug I Polymer Ratio
`
`I
`
`I
`I
`
`:m.
`
`A
`a
`0
`
`400,000
`2 million. k2
`4 mltllon
`12
`
`FIGURE 5.
`Release Constant k2 as a Function of Drug to Polymer Ratio
`and Polymer Average Molecular Mass from Tablets
`Containing Diphenhydramine HCI and Poly(oxyethylene).
`95 % Confidence Interval.
`
`increa es, since polymers of high molecular mass dissolve at a slower rate
`and are more sensitive to " alting out" effects.
`
`Comparison of k1 and k2, after dimensional normalization done by squaring
`k.,(Fig. 6), shows their relative contribution to the overall release rate from
`each polymeric system. At all drug/polymer ratios, diffusion release
`constant k1 is slightly higher, than kl for poly(oxyethylene) 4 million based
`tablets, while the opposite happens for poly(oxyethylene) 2 million; on the
`other hand, tablets made from poly( uxyethyJene) 400,000 show a k2 that is
`substantially higher than k1, an indication that erosion is the dominant
`mechanism in the overall relea ·e rate.
`
`Poorly Water Soluble Drui.
`Cf-936 chemically known as diphcnylethyl(adenosine) is an experimental
`drug that has a low water oluhility ( about 2.5 mg/ml). Tablets containing
`
`Supplied by the British Library 06 Feb 2018, 14:06 (GMT)
`
`KASHIV1028
`IPR of Patent No. 9,492,392
`
`

`

`POL Y(OXYETHYLENE) HOMOPOL YMERS
`
`1423
`
`0.008
`
`0.006
`
`0 .004
`
`I
`
`..-
`I
`.~
`
`E -C\1
`
`~
`~
`(\J
`* *
`.,....
`~ 0.002
`
`I
`I
`ll i
`
`+
`
`0
`
`0.000
`
`! • 400,000, k1 .. 2
`• 2 million, k1''2
`• 4 million, k1"'2
`t
`
`400.000. k2
`6
`D 2m !on. k2
`4 mUQon. k2
`0
`12
`
`fi
`
`4
`
`8
`Drug I Polymer Ratio
`
`FIGURE 6.
`Release Constants k1 2 and k2 as a Function of Drug to
`Polymer Ratio and Polymer Average Molecular Mass from
`Tablets Containing Diphenhydramine H Cl and
`Poly(oxyethylene).
`
`the drug showed a dissolution behavior that is quite different from that
`descrihed above. Because of the low solubility of the drug in the medium
`dissolution of the drug in the solvent front is limited. Furthermore, the
`drug does not ionize and consequently does not affect polymer dissolution
`appreciably. As a result, surface erosion is the dominant release
`mechanism, although initially the release rate of CI-936 appears to be
`controlled to a large extent by diffusion of the drug through the gel layer
`which form. on the surface of the tablet following hydration. The release
`rate of CI-936 decreases with a decrea e in the drug/polymer ratio down to
`a minimum ( 5/5 for poly(oxyethylene) 4 and 2 million or 7/3 for the
`400,000 grade) then increase again (Fig. 7-9). The release rate appears to
`be controlled by erosion at both high and low drug to polymer ratio and by
`diffu ion at intermediate ratio .
`
`Supplied by the British Library 06 Feb 2018, 14:06 (GMT)
`
`KASHIV1028
`IPR of Patent No. 9,492,392
`
`

`

`1424
`
`MORONI AND GHEBRE-SELLASSIE
`
`120
`
`100
`
`80
`
`60
`
`40
`
`20
`
`"C
`Q)
`(I]
`«1
`Q)
`<1>
`L.
`C)
`:::J
`L.
`"C
`~
`
`0
`
`0
`
`240
`
`480
`
`720
`Time <min.)
`
`960
`
`>+-i< Drug/Polymer 9/1
`~ Drug/Polymer 7/3
`~ Drug/Polymer 1/1
`G--£J Drug/Polymer 3/7
`1200
`1440
`
`FIGURE 7.
`Release Profiles of Cl 936 I Poly(oxyethylene) 4 Million
`Average Molecular Mass Tablets in pH 1.2 HCI.
`USP II (paddles). 75 rpm, 37° c.
`
`At high drug/polymer ratio the release rate is fast not only because the
`quantity of polymer that is used tp bind the tablet components in the
`matrix is low, but also the gel layer that is formed on the surface is not
`strong enough to slow drug diffusion toward the outside of the tablet.
`Visual observation of the tablets during dissolution shows that they erode
`without significant swelling; this leads to a decrease in surface area which
`in turn is responsible for the reduction in the disso]ution rate.
`
`Tablets with an intermediate drug/polymer ratio contain enough polymer to
`form a gel layer capable of slowing drug diffusion and release as well as a
`sufficient quantity of poorly water soluble drug to reduce solvent
`penetration and delay polymer dissolution. A combination of these two
`factors, therefore, slows drug release, especially during the early part of
`dissolution. Release profi1es of intermediate formulations approximate the
`
`Supplied by the British Library 06 Feb 2018, 14:06 (GMT)
`
`KASHIV1028
`IPR of Patent No. 9,492,392
`
`

`

`POL Y(OXYETHYLENE) HOMOPOL YMERS
`
`1425
`
`120
`
`100
`
`80
`
`"'0
`Q,)
`(/J
`(1J
`Q)
`Q)
`~
`
`60
`
`C>
`::s
`.... "'0
`~ 40
`
`20
`
`0
`
`0
`
`240
`
`480
`
`720
`Time <minJ
`
`960
`
`>f-t< Drug/Polymor 9/1
`9-----9 Drug/Polymer 7/3
`~ . Drug/Polymer 111
`G-O Drug/Polymer 3/7
`G-O Drug/Polymer 114
`1200
`1440
`
`FIGURE 8.
`Release Profiles of Cl 936 I Poly(oxyethylene) 2 Million
`Average Molecular Mass Tablets in pH 1.2 HCI.
`USP II (paddles). 75 rpm, 3JO C.
`
`square root of time during the early part of dissolution and then show a
`discontinuity, suggesting that release control shifts from diffusion to erosion
`when the polymer becomes sufficiently hydrated.
`
`At low drug to polymer ratio, the release rates tend to be faster because
`the solvent penetrates the tablet core unimpeded, depending only on the
`hydration rate of the polymer. Hydration is followed immediately by
`surface erosion.
`
`In an attempt to better understand the physical changes occurring during
`dissolution, tablets with varying drug/polymer ratio were removed from the
`dissoJutjon medium during the dissolution course, dried, and visually
`evaluated. It was found out that tablets with intermediate drug/polymer
`ratio were, at a given time, larger than those with high or low drug to
`polymer ratio.
`
`Supplied by the British Library 06 Feb 2018, 14:06 (GMT)
`
`KASHIV1028
`IPR of Patent No. 9,492,392
`
`

`

`1426
`
`MORONI AND GHEBRE-SELLASSIE
`
`120
`
`100
`
`80
`
`60
`
`40
`
`20
`
`"0
`Q)
`Cl) co Q)
`Q) ... en
`.... "0
`
`::J
`
`~
`
`~ Drug/Polymer 9/1
`'0'---9 Orug/Polymar 7/3
`~ Drug/Polymer 1/1
`G-£1
`
`0~--~--~--r-~~-,--~---r--~--~--~--T---,
`240
`480
`0
`960
`1200
`1440
`720
`Time <min.>
`
`FIGURE 9.
`Release Profiles of Cl 936 I Poly(oxyethylene) 400,000
`Average Molecular Mass Tablets in pH 1.2 HCI.
`USP II (paddles), 75 rpm, 37° C.
`
`Tablets with high drug/polymer ratio exhibited overall higher release rates.
`The dissolution rates were high enough initially but decrease as dissolution
`proceed·. Tablet , with low drug to polymer ratio show a linearly time
`dependent release profiles which indicate that drug reJease become
`erosion controlled immediately. Furthermore, in this case, the tablets well
`considerably, whit eroding, thus keeping the total surface area from
`changing significantly.
`
`CONCLUSION
`
`Poly( oxyethylene) polymers are hydrophilic materials suitable for the
`development of monolithic drug delivery formuJations. These polymers can
`be easily loaded up with drugs of different soJubility characteristics and
`tailored to give the dc::sired release profiles.
`
`Supplied by the British Library 06 Feb 2018, 14:06 (GMT)
`
`KASHIV1028
`IPR of Patent No. 9,492,392
`
`

`

`POL Y(OXYETHYLENE) HOMOPOL YMERS
`
`1427
`
`The rerlease rate of the tablets do not only depend upon the common
`formulation variahles such as drug/polymer ratio, polymer average
`molecular mass, and the solubility of the drug but also on the ionization
`state of the drug molecules.
`
`REFERENCES
`
`1) R.S. Langer and N.A. Peppas, Presem and future applicatio11s of
`biomaterials in corurol/ed dnlg delivel)' systems, Biomaterials, 2(10), 201-14,
`(1981).
`
`2) R.S. Langer, Polymeric delivery systems for omrol/ed dmg release, Chern.
`Eng. Comm .. 6, 1-48 (1980).
`
`3) D.R. Paul, Comrol/ed Release Polymeric Formulations. D.R. Paul and F. W
`Harris, Eds. American Chemical Society Press, Waslring10n, D. C., 1976.
`
`4) P.l Lee and N.A. Peppas,Prediction of polymer dissolwion i11 swel/able
`controlled release systems, J. Contr. Release, 6, 207-15 (Jr; 7)
`
`5) A. F. Kidonieus and B. Bemer Ed.t, Tramdermal Delivery of Drugs, Vol 1;
`CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL (1979): Chapu.•r 2: "Diffusion tlrmugh Polymers"
`
`6) R.A. Siegel and R.S. Langer, Controlled release of polypeptides and other
`macromolecules, Pharm. Res .. 2-10 (1984).
`
`7) J. Heller, Controlled release of biologically actil•e compounds from
`bioerodible polymers, Biomat, /, 51·57 ( 1980).
`
`8) P. Catellani, G.L. Vaona, P. V Plazzi, and P. Colombo, Compressed
`Matrices: Formulation and Drug Relea ·e Kinetics, Acta Plrann. Techno/., 34
`(I), 38-41 (1988).
`
`. Solomon, Comparison uf the in-
`9) J.C. Bain S.B. Tan, D. Gandenon, M .
`vitro release characteristics of a wax malri.x and a hydrogel sustained release
`diclofenac sodium tablet, Drug Dev. and Ind. Pharm., 17(2), 215-232 (1991)
`
`10) B. Gander, R. Gumy, E. Doeiker, and N.A. Peppas, Crosslinked
`poly(alkylenc oxides) for the preparation of c:omrolled release micromatrices, J.
`Contr; Rei. 5, 271-83 (1988).
`
`Supplied by the British Library 06 Feb 2018, 14:06 (GMT)
`
`KASHIV1028
`IPR of Patent No. 9,492,392
`
`

`

`1428
`
`MORONJ AND GHEBRE-SELLASSIE
`
`11) N.B. Graham and M.E. Me Neil, Hydrogel for controlled drug delivery,
`Biomal., 5(1), 27-36 (1984).
`
`12) Polyox Technical Bullelitl, Union Carbide Corp., Specialty Chemicals and
`Plastic Division, Old Ridgebwy Road, Danbury CT 06817.
`
`13) S.K Baveja, K. V Ranga Rao, A. Singh attd U.K. Gombar, Release
`characteristics of Some bronclrodilatators from compressed hydrophylic
`polymer matrices and their cu"elation with molecular geometry, Int. 1 Pharm.,
`41, 55-62 (1988).
`
`14) J.L. Ford, M.H. Rubinstein, atul J.E. Hogan, Formulation of sustained
`release promethiazine hydrochloride tablets using hydroxypropylmethyl cellulose
`matrices, 1111. J. Pharm., 24, 327-338 ( 1985).
`
`15) K.P. Dev~ K V Ratrga Rao, S. Baveja, M. Fatlt~ M. Roth, Zero-order
`release Formulation of oxprenol hydrochloride with swelling and erosion
`comrol, Pharm. Res., 6 (4), 313-17 (1989).
`
`16) K. V Ranga Rao, K. Padmalatha Devi and P. Buri, Influence of
`molecular size a1ul water solubility of the solute on ilS release from swelling
`mad erosion controlled matrices, J. Contr. Rel, 12, 33-41 (1990).
`
`17) S.K. Baveja, K V Ra11ga Rao, and K. Padmalatlta Dev~ Zero order
`relea e hydrophilic matrix tablets of B-adrenergic blockers, Int. J. Pharm., 39,
`39-45 ( 1987).
`
`18) R.S. Harland, A. Gazzaniga, M.E. Sangalli, P. Colombo, and N.A.
`Peppas, Drug/Polymer Matrix Swelling and Dissolution, PIJann. Res., 5 (8),
`488-94 ( 1988).
`
`Supplied by the British Library 06 Feb 2018, 14:06 (GMT)
`
`KASHIV1028
`IPR of Patent No. 9,492,392
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket