throbber
The NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL of MEDICINE
`
`CLINICAL PRACTICE
`
`]
`
`Rosaeea
`
`Frank C. Powell, F.R.C.P.I.
`
`This Journal feature begins with a case vignette highlighting a common clinical problem.
`Evidence supporting various strategies is then presented,followed by a review of formaI guideIines,
`when they exist. The article ends with the author’s clinical recommendations.
`
`A 47-year-old white woman reports facial redness and flushing. Her eyes are itchy and
`irritated. She thinks she may have rosacea and is worried that she will have a"whiskey
`nose." On examination, multiple erythematous papules, pustules, and telangiectasias
`are observed on a background of erythema of the central portion of her face. How
`should her case be managed?
`
`THE CLINICAL PROBLEM
`
`A constellation ofclinical symptoms and signs are included under the broad rubric of From the Regional Centre of Dermatology,
`rosacea. These consist of facial flushing, the appearance oftelangiectatic vessels and Mater Misericordiae Hospital, Dublin. Send
`reprint requests to Dr. Powell at the Region-
`persistent redness of the face, eruption of inflammatory papules and pustules on the
`al Centre of Dermatology, Mater Misericor-
`central facial convexities, and hypertrophy of the sebaceous glands of the nose, with fi-
`diae Hospital, Eccles St., Dublin 7, Ireland,
`brosis (rhinophyma).~ Ocular changes are present in more than 50 percent ofpatients or at fpowell@eircom.net.
`and range from mild dryness and irritation with blepharitis and conjunctivitis (common N E ngl J Med 2005;352: 793-803.
`symptoms) to sight-threatening keratitis (rare).2 Patients with rosacea may report in-
`copyr~eh~ © 2oos M~ss~ch~se~s Mea~c~ So~y
`creased sensitivity of the facial skin3 and may have dry, flaking facial dermatitis, edema
`of the upper face,4 or persistent granulomatous papulonodules.5 There is often an over-
`lapping of clinical features, but in the majority of patients, a particular manifestation of
`rosacea dominates the clinical picture. As a useful approach to the guidance of therapy,
`the disease can thus be classified into four subtypes -- erythematotelangiectatic (sub-
`type 1), papulopustular (2), phymatous (3), and ocular (4)6 --with the severity of each
`subtype graded as 1 (mild), 2 (moderate), or 3 (severe).7 The psychological, social, and
`occupational effects of the disease on the patient should also be assessed and factored
`into treatment decisions.
`The onset of rosacea usually occurs between the ages of 30 and 50 years.8 The
`course of the disease is typically chronic, with remissions and relapses. Some patients
`identify exacerbating factors, particularly in regard to flushing, such as heat, alcohol,
`sunlight, hot beverages, stress, menstruation, certain medications, and certain foods?
`Rosacea is more common in women than in men, but men with rosacea are more prone
`to the development of thickening and distorting phymatous skin changes. Rosacea has
`been anecdotally reported to be associated with seborrheic dermatitis (this association
`is likely), with migraine headaches in women~° (possible), and with Helicobacter pylori in-
`fection~ (controversial). A rosacea-like eruption can be induced by the topical applica-
`tion of fluorinated corticosteroids~2 and tacrolimus ointment~3 to the face. In two Eu-
`ropean population studies, the prevalence ofrosacea was reported to be 1.5 percent~4
`and 10 percent,~s but estimates are complicated by the difficulty of distinguishing be-
`tween chronic actinic damage and erythematotelangiectatic rosacea. Although rosacea
`can occur in all racial and ethnic groups, white persons of Celtic origin are thought to be
`particularly prone to the disorder,~6 and it is uncommon in persons with dark skin. Up to
`30 percent of patients report a family history ofrosacea.~7 The common misconception
`
`N ENGL J MED 352;8 WWW. NEJM.ORG FEBRUARY 24, 2005
`
`793
`
`The New England Journal of Medicine
`Downloaded from nejm.org at ALLERGAN INC on September 24, 2018. For personal use only. No other uses without permission.
`Copyright © 2005 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.
`
`1 of 11
`
`Almirall EXHIBIT 2038
`Amneal v. Almirall
`IPR2018-00608
`
`

`

`The NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL of MEDICINE
`
`794
`
`N ENGL J MED 352;8 WWW. NEJM.ORG FEBRUARY 24, 2005
`
`The New England Journal of Medicine
`Downloaded from nejm.org at ALLERGAN INC on September 24, 2018. For personal use only¯ No other uses without permission.
`Copyright © 2005 Massachusetts Medical Society¯ All rights reserved.
`
`2 ofll
`
`

`

`CLINICAL PRACTICE
`
`STRATEGIES AND EVIDENCE
`
`~
`._
`~’ ~3~
`~ o ~ .-
`.... o
`.-= ~ = n =
`.._ oa
`oa
`E
`~ o~ ao ao
`~_o o~ E
`o oa
`v o ~ c ~
`o >-z ~m~:~c ~
`
`~.~_ ..... e
`
`~
`g ~
`
`oa "
`
`m~z
`
`v v o-O-~
`
`¯ ~_-
`
`o > >
`
`o ~ o o_
`
`o > o
`
`o o .-- ~ w
`~’-~ .~
`
`con ~n
`
`that both the facial redness and the rhinophyma as-
`n _o ~:
`~o_~_~
`sociated with rosacea are due to excessive alcohol
`~ E o g
`consumptionmal<esrosaceaasociallystigmatizing
`~o*~g
`condition for many patients.
`g ~~ ~ ~ =
`oa
`>--o
`~00
`o_ ~ ~ ~
`z-~
`=o.- - ~ ~ ~ ,.. The diagnosis ofrosacea is a clinical one. There is
`noconfirmatorylaboratorytest.Biopsyiswarranted
`~ ~ 8 ~ e
`only to rule out alternative diagnoses, since histo-
`o_.~ #_
`~o
`pathological findings are not diagnostic?8
`The differential diagnosis and therapy vary ac-
`~ ~ ~ = ~
`n = ~ -
`~>._~ =~
`cording to subtype (Table 1). Rosacea that is mani-
`~.~ nr_° .2 o°
`~o~ ~~ g ~
`~o ~_
`~ ~ o n ~
`fested predominantly by flushing is difficult to treat,
`._ o o
`but the condition may improve with the manage-
`~ ~ ~o ~ ~ =
`.8~~ ~ o
`.~ o~ o
`~ ~ ~ *g
`ment of other manifestations and the avoidance
`¯ ~ ~ o 8
`of provoking or triggering factors. Inflammatory
`changes in the skin are usually responsive to medi-
`~ 8_ ~.~ ~
`cal therapies and heal without scarring, whereas tel-
`_~ ~ .o ._= ~
`~ o "6 ~ g
`._~ ._~
`angiectasias and phymatous changes often require
`~
`laserorsurgicalintervention.Ocularrosaceaisusu-
`._.-=~° ~-
`~.~=- ~ ~
`.~ .g ~
`~ ~
`~ 8 ~ .~°
`o~ ~ ~,° o =
`
`.... .... allymild and responsive to lid hygiene, tear replace-
`~ .~ Vo "~= ~:°
`.~ ~= ~_~ ~ -~ ~ ~-
`~ ~ ~ 8 ~ ment, and topical or systemic antibiotics, but pa-
`~- ~ 8 8
`o~n~- ~_~ n~_.o o
`g~-~.~
`.
`~ ~:= o
`~ o-~ ~ ~
`tientswithpersistentorsevereoculardiseaseshould
`v~:
`~ o > .... .=
`~ ~ ~
`~ ~
`= ~’~ v
`~o
`~-.~ = = ~ _o ~ ~ .-
`¯ = ~_ g ~
`be referred to an ophthalmologist. All patients
`0"7"
`~ o
`a~’~ o
`.~_ m ._ ~
`. ~: oa .m ._m
`~ N ~ o
`"g~’~ ~8
`~._= ~ ~’a-.= or-= or-
`should be advised in regard to protection from cli-
`~- = o ~
`.~ ~ .-= ~ t,
`oa
`~ ~ ~
`> >. o
`....
`~.~ matic influences (both heat and cold), avoidance
`o > o_ ~
`of factors thattrigger or exacerbate flushing or that
`~ ~= ~
`¯ ~ ~ - ~
`8 ~g e ~ ~
`¯ - o ¯
`=~_ ~ .-n o o E o~ = ~._
`nn~8
`irritate the often-sensitive sldn, appropriate care of
`nb~° ~ .o_ ~ "~ ~ ~--o n~._~_o~nO " -o~ o= ~ ~o ~
`the facial skin (Table 2), and a strategy for mainte-
`~ o o o
`~-= ~ ~ ~° ~° >. ~ .~=n~o o -o o ~ ~
`...... s " o o ~ =- ....
`nance 0fremissi0n when the condition improves.
`o-o g ~g
`The choice of medications, dosages, and duration
`o ~ ~
`~ ~ ~
`of therapy is often based on clinical experience.
`~ n ~ ~_ Off-label prescription-drug use is common. ~
`~_~.E ~ o
`n°~=
`. ~ ~ ~ o
`~- ~ ~ ~ ~ o ,, ~
`a -~ :e ~ >
`Flushing, with persistent central facial erythema
`>.n ~ o:~ o~ .
`,~.~n ,1,
`(erythematotelangiectaticrosacea), is probably the
`~ ~ ~ ~ ~
`~’-.~c ~ ~ ,,,n
`~ ~ o-~ = o = ~
`o 7
`.-~_ v 8-~
`~ most common presentation ofrosacea.6 Although
`~z o.- t~ t~
`~ ~ .- ~
`o
`- o ~
`c E .-- ~_oo c~
`~ ~__. ga
`¯ -- 000a o -- oa oa
`it has been suggested that r0sacea is essentially a
`n~=.->" o = ~=~ ~-~,~>" o .= >,
`~,~ o o~
`o .~..~ ~’.~ ~ ~v~
`n~.- ~
`cutaneous vascular disorder, facial flushingis not
`
`~n= ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ .... -~ ~ r_ ~= 8 o .-._° ~
`.... ~ o := o ~ =
`always a feature; patients who report flushing as
`~ n
`~o ._~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~. = ~
`their only symptom should not receive a diagnosis
`~
`~ 0
`~._ ~ ~
`~_~ ~
`:~ ~ >-
`o o
`~ o o
`of"prerosacea," since, in many such patients, ro-
`0 oa~
`--
`.~.~ ~ ~,~
`sacea never develops. Common causes of flushing
`.... ¯ a- o ~ ~ o
`~ ~ ..... ~ =
`(e.g., psychosocial factors or anxiety, food, alcohol
`or drugs, or menopause) should become apparent
`n o= ~._= when a medical history is tal<en. Prolonged episodes
`o~: ~.~n
`of severe flushing accompanied by sweating, flush-
`~- z-~n ~ ~ = r~ ~
`o o o g o ~ ~
`ingthatisnotlimitedtotheface, and, especially, sys-
`~ ~ ~ ~ 8 ~
`temic symptoms such as diarrhea, wheezing, head-
`<..5 o.E o.~
`ache, palpitations, or weakness indicate the need
`
`~ >
`
`~ ~a= ~a
`
`c m ~-E ~
`
`SUBTYPE 1
`
`2O
`
`~ ~
`.-
`¢0n ~
`~.._~ ~ ~ .o
`~ n 8 ~,
`~ ~ ~ = =
`~ ~ ~ 8_~
`
`~ On -O O
`
`ca-
`
`~"
`~_.
`~ ~
`8
`0
`
`N ENGL J MED 352;8 WWW. NEJM.ORG FEBRUARY 24, 2005
`
`795
`
`The New England Journal of Medicine
`Downloaded from nejm.org at ALLERGAN INC on September 24, 2018. For personal use only¯ No other uses without permission.
`Copyright © 2005 Massachusetts Medical Society¯ All rights reserved.
`
`3 ofll
`
`

`

`The NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL qfMEDICINE
`
`Table 2. General Nonpharmacologic Guidelines for the Management
`of Rosacea.
`
`Reassure patients about the benign nature of the disorder and the rarity of rhi-
`nophyma (particularly in women).
`Direct patients to Web sites such as those of the National Rosacea Society
`(www.rosacea.org) and the American Academy of Dermatology
`(www.aad.org), where patient-related information can be accessed,
`Advise patients to keep a daily diary to identify precipitating or exacerbating
`factors.
`Suggest a daily application of combined ultraviolet-A-protective and ultravio-
`let-B-protective sunscreen (with a sun-protection factor of 15 or greater),
`Sunscreen may be incorporated into moisturizer or topical medication,
`Vehicle formulations with dimethicone and cyclomethicone may be less
`irritating than others. Sun-blocking creams containing titanium dioxide
`and zinc oxide are usually well tolerated,
`Suggest a daily application of soap-free cleansers, silicone facial foundations,
`and liquid film-forming moisturizers.
`Suggest cosmetic coverage of excess redness with brush application; matte-
`finish, water-soluble facial powder containing inert green pigment helps
`neutralize erythema,
`Advise patients to avoid potentially exacerbating factors:
`Overly strenuous exercise, hot and humid atmosphere, emotional upset,
`alcohol, hot beverages, spicy foods, and large hot meals,
`Exposure to sun or to intense cold or harsh winds.
`Perfumed sunscreens or those containing insect repellents,
`Astringents and scented products containing hydroalcoholic extracts or
`sorbic acid.
`Cleansers containing acetone or alcohol,
`Abrasive or exfoliant preparations.
`Vigorous rubbing of the skin.
`Toners or moisturizers containing glycolic acid.
`If possible, medications that may exacerbate flushing (e.g., vasodilative
`drugs, nicotinic acid and amyl nitrite, calcium-channel-blocking
`agents, and opiates),
`
`, . ~
`
`,,
`
`~ ~’ " ’’~ "’
`’ - " ),~;’ ".x
`

`
`--.
`
`,
`’
`
`-
`
`-
`
`’
`
`" ; "~" ".’% t’ ,,’
`- ? ". :
`’
`i ,’

`, b i.
`; .... ~,
`- .... " -.~" "
`; :t-~ :
`i:: L~..:~x ’-.
`~M ,~,.j,, ,~
`~-.x.,
`~" ~ ’,’~,,.\i a, ~,"’
`
`
`-
`
`,
`
`,,
`
`~~L
`
`for investigations to rule out rare conditions that
`may be characterized by flushing (e.g., the carcinoid
`syndrome, pheochromocytoma, or mastocytosis).2~
`Telangiectatic vessels are usually prominent on
`the cheeks and nose in grades 2 and 3 of subtype 1
`rosacea (Fig. 1) and contribute to the facial erythe-
`ma, Erythematotelangiectatic rosacea is difficult to
`distinguish from the effects of chronic actinic dam-
`age, which may coexist. Since the management of
`the two conditions is similar, this distinction is not
`essential for patient care. Erythematotelangiectatic
`rosacea may occasionally mimic facial contact der-
`matitis, the "butterfly rash" of lupus erythematosus,
`or photosensitivity; if the diagnosis is uncertain,
`skin biopsies, serologic screening for antinuclear
`and anticytoplasmic autoantibodies, or other inves-
`tigations may be indicated.
`Subtype i rosacea is poorly responsive to treat-
`ment. The measures outlined in Table 2 are partic-
`ularly relevant for patients with subtype 1, who of-
`ten have sensitive, easilyirritated skin. There are few
`studies of the effectiveness of medical treatments
`for flushingin patients with rosacea. Beta-blockers
`in low doses (e.g., nadolol, 20 to 40 mg daily)= as
`well as clonidine and spironolactone have been used
`to treat flushing in patients with rosacea, but evi-
`dence from randomized trials is lacking to support
`the effectiveness of these agents. Endoscopic trans-
`thoracic sympathectomy has been used successfully
`to treat socially disabling blushing23; however, its
`use as a treatment for rosacea is not recommended,
`owing to rare but serious complications such as
`pneumothorax and pulmonary embolism, as well
`as postoperative increases in episodes of abnormal
`sweating.
`If the telangiectatic component is prominent, as
`it is in grade-2-to-3 disease, ablation of vessels by
`laser can be helpful. A nonblinded, uncontrolled
`study of 16 patients who had erythematotelangiec-
`tatic rosacea and were treated with pulsed-dye-
`laser therapy showed a significant improvement in
`erythema and quality of life after treatment. A1-
`though topical and systemic therapies, as outlined
`forpapulopustularrosaceabelow, are often used to
`treat patients with erythematotelangiectatic rosa-
`cea, there is little evidence of the efficacy of these
`agents. In addition, topical therapy may irritate the
`sensitive skin of patients with subtype i rosacea.
`
`24
`
`SUBTYPE 2
`Small, dome-shaped erythematous papules, some
`of which have tiny surmounting pustules, on the
`
`~
`
`Figure 1. Erythematotelangiectatic (Subtype 1) Rosacea.
`
`Prominent telangiectasias and erythema of the medial cheek are evident in
`this exam pie of grade 2 disease. As the erythema subsides, the telangiectasias
`often become more evident. This patient, who has fair skin and works out-
`side, reported sensitive, easily irritated skin and frequent flushing.
`
`i"
`
`796
`
`N ENGL J MED 352;8 WWW. NEJM.ORG FEBRUARY 24, 2005
`
`The New England Journal of Medicine
`Downloaded from nejm.org at ALLERGAN INC on September 24, 2018. For personal use only. No other uses without permission.
`Copyright © 2005 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.
`
`4 ofll
`
`

`

`CLINICAL PRACTICE
`
`convexities of the central portion of the face, with
`background erythema (Fig. 2), typify papulopustu-
`lar rosacea.6 In grade 3 disease, plaques can form
`from the coalescence of inflammatory lesions (Fig.
`3). Telangiectatic vessels, varying degrees of edema,
`ocular inflammation, and a tendency to flush are
`present in some patients. The differential diagnosis
`includes acne vulgaris, perioral dermatitis, and seb-
`orrheic dermatitis. Patients with acne vulgaris have
`less erythema, are often younger, and have oily skin
`with blackheads and whiteheads (comedones), larg-
`er pustules and nodulocystic lesions, and a tendency
`to scarring. In patients with perioral dermatitis, mi-
`cropustules and microvesicles around the mouth or
`eyes and dry, sensitive skin may follow the inappro-
`priate use of topical corticosteroids. Seborrheic der-
`matitis may accompany rosacea and contribute to
`the facial erythema, butitis distinguished from ro-
`sacea by a prominence of yellowish scaling around
`the eyebrows and alae nasi, together with trouble-
`some dandruff.
`
`Management
`Systemic or topical antibiotics, or both, are the
`mainstays of therapy for subtype 2 rosacea (Table 3),
`and the response is often satisfactory (Fig. 4A and
`4B). Moderate-to-severe (i.e., grade 2 or 3) papulo-
`pustular rosacea may require systemic therapy to
`achieve clearance of inflammatory skin lesions,
`whereas milder (grade 1 and some cases of grade 2)
`disease can often be treated with topical medica-
`tions alone.2s Although data are lacking to support
`the combined use of topical and systemic therapies,
`many clinicians recommend such a combination for
`the treatment of moderate-to-severe disease.2°,2s
`On the basis of an analysis that pooled data from
`two randomized trials, van Zuuren and colleagues
`concluded that there was strong evidence of the ef-
`ficacy of topical metronidazole and azelaic acid
`cream.26 Sixty-eight of 90 patients (76 percent)
`treated with topical metronidazole for eight or nine
`weeks considered their rosacea to be improved, as
`compared with 32 of 84 patients (38 percent) in the
`placebo group,26 Significant reductions in the num-
`ber of inflammatory lesions and in erythema were
`reported in two large placebo-controlled, double-
`blind studies of a 15 percent azelaic acid gel applied
`twice daily.27 A double-blind, randomized, parallel-
`group trial involving 251 patients with papulopus-
`tolar rosacea28 demonstrated the superiority 0f15
`percent azelaic acid gel over 0.75 percent metroni-
`dazole gel applied twice daily for 15 weeks. In a dou-
`
`--x ~-~,a._
`
`--
`
`.:
`
`~__~,~L’-~
`
`Figure 2. Papulopustular (Subtype 2) and Ocular (Subtype 4) Rosacea of Mod-
`erate Severity.
`In this example ofgrade-2-to-3 disease, the typical distribution of papules and
`)ustules on a background of inflammatory erythema is seen over the con-
`vexities of the central portion of the face, with sparing of the periocular area.
`Grade-l-to-2 ocular rosacea (erythema and edema of the upper eyelids)
`is also present.
`
`’~
`
`*-
`
`~,-,~,
`
`.
`
`Figure 3. Severe Papulopustular Rosacea with Moderate
`Ocular Involvement.
`
`In this patient with grade 3 papulopustular disease, in-
`flammatory lesions have coalesced into an erythema-
`tous plaque below the eye. Note the multiple small,
`studded pustules on the surface of the plaque and the
`inflammatory lesions on the lower eyelid (grade 2 ocular
`rosacea).
`
`N ENGLJ MED 352;8 WWW.N EJ M.ORG FEBRUARY 24, 2OO5
`
`797
`
`The New England Journal of Medicine
`Downloaded from nejm.org at ALLERGAN INC on September 24, 2018. For personal use only. No other uses without permission.
`Copyright © 2005 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.
`
`5 ofll
`
`

`

`The NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL 0fMEDICINE
`
`Table 3. Treatment of Papulopustular Rosacea.*
`
`Medication Properties and Actions
`
`Dosage and Duration"i"
`
`Co ntrai nd icatio n s
`and Side Effects’.;."
`
`Comments
`
`Topical
`Metronidazole(0.75%gel Antibacterial;antiinflam- Applied once or twicedai- Contraindications: women of Gel and cream and
`ly. Can be used as ini-
`childbearing age not on
`both concentra-
`or cream; 1% cream)
`matory,
`tial treatment to clear
`oral contraception should
`tions appear to be
`inflammatory lesions
`use with caution because
`equally effective.
`of possibility of-absorption
`or as indefinite main-
`tenance therapy after
`clearance with sys-
`
`and mutagenic effects.
`Side effects: gel preparation
`
`Azelaic acid
`(20% cream; 15% gel)
`
`Antibacterial; anti-
`inflammatory,
`
`temic therapy,
`
`Applied twice daily. Can
`be used as initial or
`indefinite mainte-
`nance therapy.
`
`may be irritating to skin.
`Transient watering of eyes
`
`may occu r when applied to
`periocular skin.
`
`Side effects: may cause mild
`burning or stinging sensa-
`tion when applied initially,
`Pruritus, dryness, or scal-
`ing can occun Rarely, con-
`tact dermatitis or facial
`edema may occun
`
`May be used in worn-
`en ofchildbearing
`age and during
`pregnancy.
`
`10% Sodium sulfaceta-
`mide and 5% sulfur in
`cream or lotion. Prep-
`arations may include
`10% urea; sunscreen;
`green tint.
`
`Antibacterial; keratolytic Applied twice daily. Can
`(sulfur); hydrating
`be used as initial or
`indefinite mainte-
`(urea).
`nance therapy.
`Cleanser preparation
`available.
`
`Contraindications: hypersensi- Sulfur component
`tivity to sulphonamide or
`may help accom-
`sulfun
`panying seborrhe-
`Side effects: rarely, systemic
`ic dermatitis. Sun-
`hypersensitivity reactions,
`screen or tinted
`May cause redness, peel-
`preparations may
`ing, and dryness of skin.
`reduce number of
`topical prepara-
`tions needed.
`
`Erythromycin
`
`(2% solution)
`
`Antibacterial; anti-
`inflammatory,
`
`Applied twice daily. Can
`be used as initial or
`indefinite mainte-
`nance therapy,
`
`Side effects: local irritation or May be used in preg-
`dryness,
`nancy. Alcohol in
`solution may re-
`duce tolerance.
`
`Tretinoin (0.025% cream Alters epidermal keratini- Applied at night. Can be Contraindications:teratogenic; Theoretically useful
`or lotion; 0.01% gel)
`zation. May improve
`used as initial or in-
`women ofchildbearing age
`for actinically
`definite maintenance
`photoaging changes,
`not on oral contraceptives
`damaged skin
`therapy,
`should use with caution.
`(common in
`Side effects: Irritating and
`rosacea).
`poorly tolerated by some
`patients. May cause photo-
`sensitivity. Use on dam-
`aged skin and contact with
`eyes should be avoided.
`
`Systemic
`Oxytetracycline Antibacterial; antiinflam- 250 to 500 mg twice daily Contraindications: should be
`
`matory, for 6 to 12 weeks to avoided bywomen who are
`achieve remission. In-
`pregnant, contemplating
`
`termittent low-dose
`therapy may prevent
`
`pregnancy, or lactating and
`by persons with impaired
`
`relapse,
`
`renal or hepatic function.
`Side effects: gastrointestinal
`
`upset; candida; photosen-
`sitivity; benign intracranial
`
`hypertension. May reduce
`effectiveness of oral contra-
`
`ceptives. May cause tooth
`discoloration or enamel hy-
`poplasia.
`Poor absorption if taken with
`
`food, milk, or some medi-
`cations.
`
`798
`
`N ENGL J MED 352;8 WWW. NEJM.ORG FEBRUARY 24, 2005
`
`The New England Joumal of Medicine
`Downloaded from nejm.org at ALLERGAN INC on September 24, 2018. For personal use only. No other uses without permission.
`Copyright © 2005 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.
`
`6 ofll
`
`

`

`CLINICAL PKACTICE
`
`Table 3. (Continued.)*
`
`Medication
`
`Properties and Actions
`
`Dosage and Durationi"
`
`Doxycycline
`
`Minocycline
`
`Antibacterial; antiinflam- 50 to 100 mg once or
`twice daily for 6 to 12
`rnatory,
`weeks.
`
`Contraindications
`and Side Effects.’.;."
`
`Same as for oxytetracycline.
`
`Comments
`
`May be taken with
`food.
`
`Antibacterial; antiinflam- 50 to 100 mg twice daily Contraindications: pregnancy Randomized, clinical
`or sustained-action
`or lactation. Persons with
`trials to support
`matory,
`formulation once dai-
`hepatic impairment should
`its use in rosacea
`ly for 6 to 12 weeks,
`use with caution,
`are lacking, but
`Side effects: gastrointestinal
`clinical impres-
`upset (but less than with
`sion is of-equal
`tetracycline); allergic reac-
`efficacy to oxytet-
`tions. Hyperpigmentation
`racycline. Unlike
`of-th e s kin m ay occu n
`oxytetracycli n e,
`Long-term use should be
`can be taken with
`avoided (hepatic damage
`food.
`or systemic-lu pus-erythe-
`matosus-like syndrome
`may be induced). Drug in-
`teractions with antacids,
`mineral supplements, anti-
`coagulants.
`
`Erythromycin
`
`Antibacterial; antiinflam- 250 to 500 mg once or
`twice daily for 6 to 12
`matory,
`weeks.
`
`Contraindications: severe
`hepatic impairment,
`Side effects: gastrointestinal
`upset; headache or rash.
`Drug interactions (many).
`
`Metronidazole
`
`Antibacterial; antiinflam- 200 mg once or twice dai- Contraindications: pregnant
`ly for 4 to 6 weeks,
`or lactating women should
`matory,
`use with caution,
`Side effects: gastrointestinal
`upset; leukopenia; neuro-
`logic effect (seizures or pe-
`ripheral neuropathy). Drug
`interactions with alcohol,
`anticoagulants, or pheno-
`barbital.
`
`Alternative to oxy-
`tetracycline or
`minocycline as
`first-line systemic
`treatment. Useful
`if-systemic thera-
`py necessary in
`
`oxytetracycline-
`intolerant or preg-
`nant or lactating
`patients.
`
`Side-effect profile lim-
`its its use to resis-
`tant cases for
`short periods.
`
`* Topical treatment alone is usually effective for mild-to-moderate (grade-l-to-2) papulopustular rosacea. Topical metronidazole, combination
`10 percent sodium sulf-acetamide and 5 percent sulfur, and 15 percent azelaic acid have been approved by the Food and Drug Administration
`for the treatment of- rosacea; however, several other topical medications are used off label. For patients with moderate-to-severe papulopus-
`tular rosacea (grade 2 to 3), oral medication is usually indicated. These patients may not tolerate topical medications initially, owing to in-
`flamed skin, but topical therapy may be added as the inflammation subsides and is used to maintain remission af-ter cessation of-oral therapy.
`
`"i" Dosage ranges relate to published reports and reflect the lack of- uniformity in the approach to the treatment of- papulopustular rosacea.
`:~" Contraindications and side effects are selected examples rather than a comprehensive summary.
`
`fur lotion with 0.75 percent metronidazole showed
`ble-blind study of 103 patients, a lotion containing
`10 percent sodium sulfacetamide and 5 percent sul- a significantly greater clearance of lesions among
`the patients treated with sodium sulfacetamide and
`fur reduced inflammatory lesions by 78 percent, as
`compared with a reduction of 36 percent in the pla-
`sulfur.3° An uncontrolled study showed a reduction
`cebo group.29 An investigator-blinded study involv-
`in erythema, papules, and pustules in 13 of 15 pa-
`ing 63 patients that compared the combination of tients (87 percent) who were treated with topical
`10 percent sodium sulfacetamide and 5 percent sul-
`erythromycin applied twice daily for four weeks.3z
`
`N ENGL J MED 352;8 WWW. NEJM.ORG FEBRUARY 24, 2005
`
`799
`
`The New England Joumal of Medicine
`Downloaded from nejm.org at ALLERGAN INC on September 24, 2018. For personal use only. No other uses without permission.
`Copyright © 2005 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.
`
`7ofll
`
`

`

`The NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL of MEDICINE
`
`A
`
`’- -~-~-~T
`
`_
`.~- ~ ,~
`"
`’-
`
`,.
`
`,
`
`"~’
`
`i
`
`B
`
`~<,
`
`-
`
`Figure 4. Response to Treatment in a Patient with Papulopustular Rosacea.
`
`three times per week; moderate or marked improve-
`ment was observed in all patients after four weeks
`of therapy.3s
`Oral isotretinoin in low doses has been reported
`to be effective in the control of rosacea that was
`otherwise resistantto treatment, but the ocular and
`cutaneous drying effects of this agent are poorly
`tolerated, and its potential for serious adverse ef-
`fects (including teratogenic effects) contradicts its
`use in routine care. Topical tretinoin has been re-
`ported to be as effective as oral isotretinoin after 16
`weeks of treatment36 and may be helpful in the treat-
`ment of patients with papulopustular rosacea who
`also have oily skin.37
`Anecdotal reports have suggested that Cucumis
`sativus (cucumber), applied in a cooled yogurt paste,
`is helpful in reducing facial edema ofrosacea that
`is otherwise resistant to treatment38 and that facial
`massage involving rotatory movements of the fin-
`gers from the central to the peripheral face may im-
`prove papulopustular and edematous skin chang-
`es.39 However, data that support the effectiveness
`of either of these treatments are lacking.
`
`This patient with grade-2-to-3 papulopustular rosacea (Panel A) was given
`oral antibiotics for six weeks, followed by topical maintenance therapy, as
`well as continuous application ofa sunscreen with a sun-protection factor
`of 15 or greater. Eight weeks after the initiation of therapy (Panel B), the
`inflammatory papules and pustules had cleared, although some residual
`erythema persisted.
`
`Maintenance Therapy
`Because relapse occurs in about one quarter of pa-
`tients within weeks after the cessation of systemic
`therapy,4° topical therapy is usually used in an effort
`to maintain remission.4~ The required duration of
`Evidence of the efficacy of oral metronidazole
`and tetracycline was also reported by van Zuuren et maintenance therapy is unknown, but a period of
`al.a6 Of 73 patients who were treated with tetracy-
`six months is generally advised.4a After this time,
`cline forfourto sixweeks, 56 (77 percent) werecon- some patients report that they can keep their skin
`sidered to have improvement, as compared with 28
`free ofpapulopustular lesions with topical therapy
`of 79 (35 percent) in the placebo group,a6 Among 14 applied on alternate days or twice weekly, whereas
`patients treated with 200 mg ofmetronidazole twice others require repeated courses of systemic medi-
`daily for six weeks, 10 were considered to have im- cation.
`provement, as compared with 2 of 13 patients (15
`percent) who received placebo pills.32 A double- SUBTYPE 3
`blind trial that compared 200 mg ofmetronidazole Phymatous rosacea is uncommon. The most fre-
`twice daily with 250 mg of tetracycline twice daily quent phymatous manifestation is rhinophyma
`for 12 weeks among 40 patients showed that the
`(known familiarly as "whiskeynose" or "rum blos-
`two agents were equally effective.33 Although both som"). In its severe forms (grade 3), rhinophyma
`minocycline and erythromycin are frequently used
`is a disfiguring condition ofthe nose resulting from
`in the systemic treatment ofrosacea, there are few hyperplasia of both the sebaceous glands and the
`data available on the effectiveness of these agents, connective tissue (Fig. 5). Rhinophyma occurs
`On the basis of clinical experience, some investiga- much more often in men than in women (approxi-
`mrs have suggested thatintermittentlow-dose anti- mate ratio, 20:1),43 and a number ofclinicopatho-
`biotic treatment (250 mg oftetracycline on alternate
`logic variants have been described.44 Although rhi-
`days) may be as effective as multiple daily doses.34 nophymais often referred to as "end-stage rosacea,"
`An uncontrolled study of 10 patients with moder-
`it may occur in patients with few or no other features
`ate or severe rosacea that had responded poorly to ofrosacea. The diagnosis is usually made on a clin-
`treatment were prescribed 250 mg ofazithromycin
`ical basis, but a biopsy may be necessary to distin-
`
`8OO
`
`N ENGL J MED 352;8 WWW.NEJM.ORG FEBRUARY 24, 2005
`
`The New England Journal of Medicine
`Downloaded from nejm.org at ALLERGAN INC on September 24, 2018. For personal use only. No other uses without permission.
`Copyright © 2005 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.
`
`8 ofll
`
`

`

`CLINICAL PKACTICE
`
`lids with warm water twice daily), fucidic acid, and
`metronidazole gel applied to lid margins are treat-
`ments that are frequently used to treat mild ocular
`rosacea. Systemic antibiotics are often additionally
`required for grade-2-to-3 disease, although limited
`data are available to support these approaches. In a
`double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, 35 patients
`with ocular rosacea who received 250 mg ofoxytet-
`racycline twice daily for six weeks had a significant-
`ly higher rate of remission than did patients who
`received a placebo (65 percentvs. 28 percent).49 In
`an uncontrolled study of 39 patients with cutane-
`ous rosacea (28 with ocular symptoms), 100 mg of
`doxycycline daily for 12 weeks improved symp-
`toms ofdryness, itching, blurred vision, and photo-
`sensitivity,s° After ocular symptoms subside, the
`maintenance of lid hygene and the use of artificial
`tears are usually recommended. However, such
`treatmentmaybeinadequate formoderate-to-severe
`ocular rosacea, and patients with persistent or po-
`tentially serious ocular symptoms should be re-
`ferred to an ophthalmologist.
`
`Figure 5. Advanced Rhinophyma (Subtype 3).
`
`In grade 3 rhinophyma, enlargement and distortion of
`the nose occur, with prominent pores and thickened skin
`due to hyperplasia of the sebaceous glands and fibrosis
`of the connective tissue. There is follicular prominence
`and a distorted nodular appearance. In this patient, the
`rhinophyma was accompanied by mild papulopustular
`rosacea, which responded well to topical medications.
`
`AREAS OF U NC E RTAI NTY
`
`guish atypical, or nodular, rhinophyma from lupus
`pernio (sarcoidosis of the nose); basal-cell, squa-
`mous-cell, and sebaceous carcinomas; angiosarco-
`The causes and pathogenesis of rosacea remain
`ma; and even nasal lymphoma.4s
`Data from randomized trials of therapies for rhi- poorly understood.4,sz Data from randomized, clin-
`ical trials on the efficacy and optimal duration of
`nophy

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket