throbber
Interaction of Topical Sulfacetamide
`and Topical Dapsone With Benzoyl Peroxide
`
`Meghan I. Dubina, BS; Alan B. Fleischer Jr, MD
`
`Background: A recent study demonstrated evidence of
`a yellow-orange discoloration of the skin and hair when
`topical dapsone gel was combined with benzoyl perox-
`ide. This phenomenon had previously been observed by
`one of us (A.B.F.) when sulfasalazine was combined with
`benzoyl peroxide. To investigate these interaction phe-
`nomena, topical dapsone gel and sulfacetamide sodium lo-
`tion were combined with various topical acne treat-
`ments, including benzoyl peroxides, clindamycin
`phosphate, and retinoids. Arc h Dermato l. 2009; 145 (9): 102 7-1029
`
`Conclusions: Knowledge of the chemical reaction be-
`tween benzoyl peroxide and sulfacetamide and dapsone
`will help minimize the occurrence of this interaction on
`our patients’ skin.
`
`Observations: Products containing benzoyl peroxide
`produced an orange-brown discoloration when mixed
`with either sulfacetamide or dapsone.
`
`A CNE IS ONE OF THE MOST
`
`common reasons for visits
`to dermatologists in the
`United States.1 It is caused
`by abnormalities of the pi-
`losebaceous unit such as increased sebum
`production, bacterial overgrowth, hyper-
`keratinization, and inflammation.2 Corn-
`bination treatment of acne vulgaris is of-
`ten implemented to address each of these
`abnormalities. Treatment with multiple
`medications is more effective and works
`more quickly than treatment with single
`agents? Therefore, it is vital to under-
`stand possible reactions among topical acne
`medications to minimize adverse events and
`to maximize safety and efficacy,
`One such reaction is the oxidation and
`inactivation of tretinoin by benzoyl perox-
`ide. This reaction is accelerated when the
`medications are exposed to light.3,4 An-
`other reaction was discovered in a recent
`study that evaluated the efficacy of dap-
`sone gel, 5%, in combination with other
`topical acne medications? In that study, 7
`of 100 patients (7%) in the dapsone gel and
`benzoyl peroxide group noted a tempo-
`rary yellow to orange discoloration of the
`skin and/or facial hair after application of
`both medications 10 minutes apart. The dis-
`coloration lasted between 4 and 57 days,
`resolved after discontinuation of treat-
`ment, and caused 2 of the 7 patients to dis-
`continue the clinical trial? According to the
`authors, the patients also complained that
`the products stained their clothing and that
`the stains were difficult to remove. To our
`knowledge, this reaction has not been pre-
`viously reported in the literature. The phe-
`
`nomenon had previously been observed by
`one of us (A.B.F.) when sulfasalazine was
`combined with benzoyl peroxide.
`Dapsone gel (Figure ! A), a synthetic sul-
`fone, was recently approved by the Food and
`Drug Administration in a topical aqueous
`gel form to treat acne vulgaris.<r The anti-
`inflammatory and antimicrobial properties
`of dapsone have previously been imple-
`mented in an oral form to treat dermatitis
`herpetiformis, Hansendisease, and, morehis-
`torically, severe acne.s 10 Systemic dapsone
`is typically reserved for the treatment of se-
`verenodularacneduetoadose-dependent
`hematologic toxic reaction.n The topical
`form was developed with hopes ofminimiz-
`ing this adverse effect and of attaining effi-
`cacy in the treatment of acne vulgaris.
`Sulfacetamide sodium (Figure 1B), a sul-
`fonamide, demonstrates bacteriostatic ac-
`tivity against both gram-negative and gram-
`positive organisms. It competitively
`antagonizes para-aminobenzoic acid, caus-
`ing interference with bacterial DNA syn-
`thesis.12 Benzoyl peroxide (Figure 1C), an
`organic peroxide, is one of the most com-
`monly prescribed acne medications be-
`cause of its antibacterial, antikeratolytic, and
`comedolytic actions.13 It is converted to ben-
`zoic acid in the skin and primarily targets
`the pilosebaceous units.14 The bactericidal
`action of benzoyl peroxide against Propi-
`onibacterium aches is thought to involve the
`release of free-radical oxygen through the
`degradation of bacterial proteins and inter-
`action with microbial cell components.14
`The labile O-O bond is the source of these
`free radicals, which are the active interme-
`diary and the cause of many of benzoyl per-
`
`Author Affiliations:
`Department of Dermatology,
`Wake Forest University School
`of Medicine, Winston-Salem,
`North Carolina.
`
`(REPRINTED) ARCH DERMATOLIVOL 145 (NO. 9), SEP 2009
`1027
`Downloaded from www.arehdermatol.eom at Allergan, on November 19, 2009
`©2009 American Medical Association. All rights reserved.
`
`WWW.ARCHDERMATOL.COM
`
`1 of 3
`
`Almirall EXHIBIT 2025
`Amneal v. Almirall
`IPR2018-00608
`
`

`

`0
`
`]
`
`O
`
`0
`
`Na+
`
`\~s
`
`jN ~
`
`~\
`0
`
`[[
`0
`
`[]
`
`H2N --
`
`[]
`
`[]
`
`H2N
`
`0
`
`Figure 1. Chemical structures of dapsone, sulfacetamide sodium, and benzoyl
`peroxide. A, Dapsone, International Union for Pure and Applied Chemistry
`(IUPAC) name: 4,4’-sulfonylbisbenzenamine; molecular formula: 612H12N202S.
`B, Sulfaeetamide sodium, IUPAC name: N-aeetyl-4-aminobenzenesulfonamide
`sodium; molecular formula: CsHgN2NaO3S. C, Benzoyl peroxide, IUPAC name:
`dibenzoylperoxide; moleeularformula: 014H1004.
`
`oxide’s biologic effects.15,16 The effectiveness of benzoyl per-
`oxide can be enhanced if the molecule gains access to a
`tertiary amine for electron transfer. For example, when ben-
`zoyl peroxide is combined with antibiotics or antifungal
`agents containing tertiary amines, such as erythromycin,
`cfindamycin phosphate, terbinafine, and butenifine, thera-
`peutic results are improved.15,17,1s Detrimental effects can
`also result from the use of these free radicals. When ter-
`tiary amine-containing topical anesthetic agents were ap-
`plied to skin that was pretreated with benzoyl peroxide,
`the anesthetic effect diminished by 75%.19 The aims of this
`study were to further investigate the discoloration reac-
`tion between dapsone gel and benzoyl peroxide and to
`evaluate whether or not a similar reaction would occur with
`sulfacetamide and benzoyl peroxide,
`
`A half a pea-sized amount of sulfacetamide solution, 10%, was
`applied to 8 different sections of a white cotton dinner napkin,
`Then, another half a pea-sized amount of each of the following
`was added to the sulfacetamide and the ingredients were mixed
`together: creamy benzoyl peroxide wash, 8%; clindamycin, 1%,
`plus benzoyl peroxide gel, 5% (BenzaClin, gel 1); clindamycin,
`1%, plus benzoyl peroxide gel, 5% (Duac, gel 2); topical clinda-
`mycin gel, 1%; tretinoin gel, 0.05%; tazarotene cream, 0.1%; and
`adapalene gel, 0.3%. One of the sulfacetamide applications served
`as the control, as no additional product was mixed. The same ap-
`plication process was repeated with dapsone gel, 5%, mixing it
`with each of the additional topical medications and leaving 1 area
`of dapsone gel to serve as the control. Then, photography was
`performed at 30-minute intervals for 6 hours and at 12 hours,
`Finally, the napkin was washed and dried with a nonbleach de-
`
`tergent in a warm/cold cycle to determine whether the product
`residue was easily removable. All photographs are original, with-
`out color correction, but were taken in a room with natural and
`fluorescent lighting, which varied over the course of the day.
`
`In all groups containing sulfacetamide, including the con-
`trol, a faint orange ring was visible at 30 minutes and re-
`mained at 12 hours (Figu~ 2). A yellow tint was present
`in the sulfacetamide plus benzoyl peroxide group at 3 hours,
`followed by a similar yellow tint in both sulfacetamide plus
`benzoyl peroxide and clindamycin plus benzoyl peroxide
`groups at 4 hours. These yellow tints gradually developed
`into an orange-brown color by 12 hours. Aside from the
`faint orange ring, there was no color change in the sulfa-
`cetamide control or in the sulfacetamide plus clindamy-
`cin, sulfacetamide plus tretinoin, sulfacetamide plus taz-
`arotene, or sulfacetamide plus adapalene groups.
`In the groups containing dapsone gel, an orange change
`occurred in the dapsone gel plus benzoyl peroxide group
`at 1 hour, followed by both dapsone plus cfindamycin and
`dapsone plus benzoyl peroxide groups at around 2 hours.
`At 6 hours, these 3 groups were brown. A faint yellow color
`change was noted in the dapsone gel control, dapsone gel
`plus clindamycin, dapsone gel plus tretinoin, dapsone gel
`plus tazarotene, and dapsone gel plus adapalene groups
`at 5 hours; it persisted for 12 hours. After the napkin was
`washed and dried, no product remained in any of the
`groups containing sulfacetamide. In the dapsone gel-
`containing groups--the dapsone plus benzoyl peroxide and
`the 2 combination dapsone gel plus cfindamycin and ben-
`zoyl peroxide products--brown stains remained despite
`washing. Also, a pale-yellow residue was noticeable in all
`other dapsone gel-containing groups.
`
`All benzoyl peroxide products used in this study, includ-
`ing the benzoyl peroxide creamy wash, 8%, and 2 differ-
`ent cfindamycin, 1%, plus benzoyl peroxide gel, 5%, prod-
`ucts produced a discoloration reaction when mixed with
`either sulfacetamide or dapsone gel. Based on these re-
`suits, both sulfacetamide and dapsone gel share a similar
`reaction with benzoyl peroxide, although the exact chemi-
`cal reaction is unclear.
`Because topical medications are frequently used in com-
`bination for the treatment of acne, these results are useful
`in understanding the possible reactions caused by the use
`of various topical acne medications. In these cases, it would
`be beneficial to use the medications at different times of the
`day and to encourage patients to completely wash off the
`benzoyl peroxide before applying other topical agents. Edu-
`cating patients bywarning them about the discoloration and
`inactivation reactions may help stress adherence to the des-
`ignated treatment plan. Emphasizing the possibility of cloth-
`ing stains would also deter patients from drifting from the
`prescribed regimen. Dapsone alone, at least on cloth, can
`impart a slight color. Unlike cloth, skin does not appear to
`be discolored by dapsone gel monotherapy or by dapsone
`in combinationwith non-benzoyl peroxide-containing prod-
`
`(REPRINTED) ARCH DERMATOIJVOL 145 (NO. 9), SEP 2009
`1028
`Downloaded from www.axchdermatol.com at Allergaaa, on November 19, 2009
`©2009 American Medical Association. All rights reserved.
`
`WWW.ARCHDERMATOL.COM
`
`2 of 3
`
`

`

`0 rnin
`
`2 h
`
`4 h
`
`6h
`
`Correspondence: Alan B. Fleischer Jr, MD, Department
`of Dermatology, Wake Forest University School of Medi-
`cine, Medical Center Boulevard, Winston-Salem, NC
`27157-1071 (afleisch@wfubmc. edu).
`Author Contributions: Dr Fleischer had full access to all
`the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integ-
`rity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis. Study
`concept and design: Fleischer. Acquisition of data: Dubina
`and Fleischer. Analysis and interpretation of data: Dubina
`and Fleischer. Drafting of the manuscript: Dubina and
`Fleischer. Critical revision of the manuscript for important
`intellectual content: Fleischer. Administrative, technical, or
`material support: Fleischer. Study supervision: Fleischer.
`Financial Disclosure: Dr Fleischer has served on the
`advisory board of Allergan, Amgen, Astellas, Galderma,
`GSK, and Stiefel; has served as a consultant to Astellas,
`Asubio, Combe, Galderma, Gerson Lehrman, Intendis,
`Kikaku America International, Merz, and Novartis Ser-
`entis; has been an investigator for 3M, Abbott, Amgen,
`Astellas, Asubio, Biogen, Dow, Centocor, Coria, Gal-
`derma, GSK, Genentech, Healthpoint, Intendis, Medicis,
`Novartis, Ortho-Neutrogena, Pfizer, and Stiefel; has
`been a member of the speaker bureau of Amgen, Astel-
`las, Galderma, Intendis, Medicis, Novartis, and Stiefel;
`and is now a consultant for Allergan Inc.
`
`1. FleischerAB Jr, Feldman SR, Bradham DD. Office-based physician services pro-
`vided by dermatologists in the United States in 1990. J InvestOermatol. 1994;
`102(1):93-97.
`2. Leyden JJ. A review of the use of combination therapies for the treatment of acne
`vulgaris. JAmAcadDermatol. 2003;49(3)(suppl):S200-S21 O.
`3. Shroot B. Pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of topical adapalene. JAm
`AcadDermatol. 1998;39(2, pt 3):Sl 7-S24.
`12 h 4. Feldman S, Careccia RE, Barham KL, Hancox J. Diagnosis and treatment of acne.
`Am Faro Physician. 2004;69(9):2123-2130.
`5. Fleischer AB, Draelos ZD, Abramovits W, Pariser DM. Dapsone gel 5% in com-
`bination with adapalene gel 0.1%, benzoyl peroxide gel 4%, or vehicle gel for
`the treatment of acne vulgaris: a randomized, double-blind study. J Am Acad
`Dermatol. 2007;56:AB16.
`6. Paniker U, Levine N. Uapsone and sulfapyridine. Dermatol Olin. 2001 ;19(1):79-
`86, viii.
`7. Zhu YI, Stiller MJ. Dapsone and sulfones in dermatology: overview and update.
`J Am Acad Dermatol. 2001;45(3):420-434.
`8. Ross CM. The treatment of acne vulgaris with dapsone. BrJOermatol. 1961 ;73:
`367-370.
`9. Prendiville JS, Logan RA, Russell-Jones R. A comparison of dapsone with 13-
`cis retinoic acid in the treatment of nodular cystic acne. Olin Exp Dermatol. 1988;
`13(2):67-71.
`10. Wolf R, Matz H, Orion E, Tuzun B, Tuzun Y. Dapsone. DermatolOnlineJ. 2002;
`8(1 ):2.
`
`After washing
`
`-- ~ 2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`~., ~
`
`:$
`
`!I
`
`12
`
`1:3
`
`1
`
`1~,
`
`:~
`
`0 ~]~
`
`O
`
`Figure 2. Photographs of sulfacetamide sodium and dapsone combined with
`different acne medications on a white cotton napkin at 0 minutes and at 2, 4,
`6, and 12 hours after application and after the napkin is washed,
`
`ucts.5 The colored precipitate that does occur on skin with
`benzoyl products is easily wiped away and does not stain
`skin. Dapsone gel has recently been marketed in the United
`States for the treatment ofacne, andsulfacetamideis already
`being prescribed. It is important for dermatologists and other
`physicians to understand the possible reactions when they
`are developing treatment plans for their patients,
`
`Accepted for Publication: February 1, 2009.
`
`dapsone gel, 5% for the treatment of acne vulgaris. Olin Pharmacokinet. 2007;
`~ 11. ThiboutotDM, WillmerJ, SharataH, HalderR, GarrettS. Pharmacokineticsof
`46(8) :697-712.
`12. Mandell GL, Bennett JE, Uolin R, eds. Mandell, Douglas, and Bennett’s Prin-
`ciples and Practice of Infectious Diseases. New York, NY: Churchill Livingstone
`Inc; 2000.
`13. Burkhart CG, Burkhart ON. Antibacterial properties of benzoyl peroxide in aero-
`bic and anaerobic conditions. IntJDermatol. 2006;45(11):1373-1374.
`14. Akhavan A, Bershad S. Topical acne drugs: review of clinical properties, sys-
`temic exposure, and safety. Am J Olin Dermatol. 2003;4(7):473-492.
`15. Burkhart ON, Specht K, Neckers D. Synergistic activity of benzoyl peroxide and
`erythromycin. Skin PharmacolAppl Skin Physiol. 2000;13(5):292-296.
`16. Burkhart CG, Burkhart ON. Antibacterial properties of soluble benzoyl peroxide.
`lnt J Dermatol. 2008;47(3):301-302.
`17. Burkhart CG, Burkhart CN, Isham N. Synergistic antimicr0bial activity by c0m-
`bining an allylamine with benzoyl peroxide with expanded coverage against yeast
`and bacterial species. BrJDermatol. 2006;154(2):341-344.
`18. Burkhart CG, Burkhart ON. Treatment of acne vulgaris without antibiotics: ter-
`tiary amine-benzoyl peroxide combination vs. benzoyl peroxide alone (Proactiv
`Solution). IntJDermatol. 2007;46(1):89-93.
`19. Burkhart CG, Burkhart CN. Decreased efficacy of topical anesthetic creams in
`presence of benzoyl peroxide. OermatolSurg. 2005;31(11, pt 1):1479-1480.
`
`(REPRINTED) ARCH DERMATOL/VOL 145 (NO. 9), SEP 2009
`1029
`Downloaded from www.aacchdermatol.com at Allergaaa, on November 19, 2009
`©2009 American Medical Association. All rights reserved.
`
`WWW.ARCHDERMATOL.COM
`
`3 of 3
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket