throbber
World Health
`Organization
`
`20, AVENUE APPIA - CH-1211 GENEVA 27 - SWITZERLAND - TEL CENTRAL +41 22 791 2111 - FAX CENTRAL +41 22 791 3111 - WWW.WHO.INT
`
`QSM/MC/IEA. 117
`
`4 March 2008
`
`Information Exchange System
`
`Alert No. 117
`
`Antimalarial chlorproguanil-dapsone (LapDapTM) withdrawn following demonstration of
`post-treatment haemolytic anaemia in G6PD deficient patients in a Phase III trial of
`chlorproguanil-dapsone-artesunate (DacartTM) versus artemether-lumefantrine
`(Coartem®) and confirmation of findings in a comparative trial
`of LapDapTM versus Dacart TM
`
`GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) and Medicines for Malaria Venture (MMV) have decided to terminate the
`
`further development of DacartTM, a fixed-dose combination antimalarial product of chlorprognanil,
`
`dapsone and artesunate (CDA). GSK has also commenced a product recall process at pharmacy level in
`
`Kenya, for LapDapTM, another anti-malarial product containing chlorprognanil and dapsone (CD). These
`
`decisions axe based on data from two Phase III clinical trials assessing the efficacy and safety of CDA
`
`(DacartTM) and CD (LapDapTM); significant reductions of haemoglobin levels in patients with G6PD
`
`deficiency have been observed with both CDA and CD.
`
`Background information
`
`Chlorproguanil-dapsone (LapDapTM)
`
`This product was granted a marketing authorization in July 2003 by the United Kingdom Medicines and
`
`Healthcoxe products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) for the treatment of uncomplicated falciparum malaria.
`
`Chlorprognanil-dapsone (CD) was contraindicated in patients with known glucose-6-phosphate
`
`dehydrogenase (G6PD) deficiency. In view of the potential widespread use of CD (LapDapTM) in malaria
`
`endemic sub-Saharan Africa, the high prevalence of G6PD deficiency in the region (estimated to affect
`
`around 10-25% of the population in sub-Saharan Africa) and the limited availability of screening tests for
`
`this genetic condition in Africa, WHO had undertaken a safety assessment of the product in 2004, to
`
`provide recommendations on the safe use of CD (LapDapTM) in Africa.
`
`The WHO expert group cautioned against the use of the medicine in G6PD deficient patients and made
`
`the following recommendations:
`
`1. This medicine should be used only if a diagnosis of malaria is confirmed.
`
`2. CD should be used only after severe anaemia (haemoglobin concentration < 5 g/dl) and
`
`Organisation mondiale de la Sant6 ¯ BceuHpHaa opraHHaaLl~a 3~lpaBooxpaHeH~ ¯ Organization Mundial de la Salud
`
`1 of 2
`
`Almirall EXHIBIT 2012
`Amneal v. Almirall
`IPR2018-00608
`
`

`

`Page 2
`
`G6PD deficiency have been excluded by appropriate tests. In patients with a haemoglobin
`
`concentration of 7 g/dl, administration of CD should be considered with caution and should be
`
`undertaken only under clinical supervision, with monitoring of the haemoglobin concentration. The
`
`diagnosis of methaemoglobinaemia is less important.
`
`3. In areas where G6PD deficiency is prevalent but appropriate tests are not available, an alternative
`
`antimalarial medicine should be used.
`
`4. If there is no suitable alternative, CD should be used but in cognizance of the haematological risks
`
`associated with this medicine.
`
`The group also advised that these recommendations should be reconsidered when more data become
`
`available from pharmacovigilance and active post-marketing surveillance.
`
`The WHO safety assessment report also provided a series of recommendations for ongoing and planned
`
`clinical trials as well as phase IV studies to gather the necessary evidence on safety of CD (LapDapTM),
`
`including in malaria patients with G6PD deficiency. However, several CD (LapDapTM) phase IV studies
`
`which started in African countries did not continue beyond April 2006 due to low utilization of this
`
`medicine. Research on the safety aspects mainly continued as part of the Medicines for Malaria Venture
`
`(MMV)- sponsored studies on chlorprognanil-dapsone-artesunate (CDA).
`
`Chlorproguanil-dapsone-artesunate (DacarffM)
`
`GSK’s multi-center, double-blind Phase III clinical trial of chlorproguanil-dapsone-artesunate (CDA)
`
`versus the combination antimalarial lumefantrine-artemether (Coartem®) in Africa suggest a strong
`
`association between haemolytic anaemia and CDA treatment for uncomplicated falciparum malaria in
`
`G6PD deficient patients. The study included 1372 patients. Study results showed a significant reduction
`
`in haemoglobin due to haemolytic anaemia in patients with G6PD deficiency, with lowest levels of
`
`haemoglobin occurring seven days after treatment. At day 7, 35% of the patients with G6PD deficiency
`
`treated with CDA had a reduction in haemoglobin of more than 2 g/dl compared to 8% of patients treated
`
`with Coartem®, and 10% of the patients with G6PD deficiency treated with CDA had a reduction in
`
`haemoglobin of more than 4 g/dl compared to 0% of patients treated with Coartem®. 38% of the male
`
`patients with G6PD deficiency had severe anaemia after treatment with CDA, compared to 0% in the
`
`group treated with Coartem®. In total, 15 patients had severe post-treatment haemolysis requiring blood
`
`transfusion in the study: all 15 were in the CDA treated group, 13 of whom were G6PD deficient.
`
`References:
`
`1. Press Release. GlaxoSmithKline and Medicines for Malaria Venture, 29 February 2008, London,
`
`UK; Geneva, Switzerland.
`
`2. Review of the safety of chlorprognanil-dapsone in the treatment of uncomplicated falciparum
`
`malaria in Africa: Report of a Technical Consultation convened by the World Health
`
`Organization. WHO, 2005, Switzerland (http://www.who.int/malaria/docs/LapDap.pdf).
`
`Organisation mondiale de la (cid:128);ant~ ¯ BCeMHpHa~ opraHaaaLLH~ 3~paBooxpaHeHH~ ¯ Organizadbn Mundial de la Salud
`
`2 of 2
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket