throbber
Garmin International, Inc. and
`Garmin USA, Inc. v.
`LoganTree, LP
`
`P.T.A.B. Proceedings IPR2018-00564 and IPR2018-00565
`U.S. Patent No. 6,059,576
`June 4, 2019
`
`MCCATHERN PLLC
`Demonstrative Exhibit – Not Evidence
`
`Exhibit 2004
`IPR2018-00564 and IPR2018-00565
`
`1
`
`

`

`EX2001, at 21 (¶¶ 38-43); POR of 564, at 4-5
`Demonstrative Exhibit – Not Evidence
`
`Figure A1
`
`2
`
`

`

`Stewart and Rush Do Not Disclose At Least
`the Below Claimed Features
`• “interpreting, using a microprocessor included in the portable, self-
`contained movement measuring device, said physical movement data
`based on user-defined operational parameters and a real-time clock”
`• “detecting, using the microprocessor, a first user-defined event based
`on the movement data and at least one of the user- defined
`operational parameters regarding the movement data”
`• “storing, in said memory, first event information related to the
`detected first user-defined event along with first time stamp
`information reflecting a time at which the movement data causing the
`first user-defined event occurred”
`Claim 20
`POR of 564, at 16, 22, and 25
`Demonstrative Exhibit – Not Evidence
`
`3
`
`

`

`Stewart and Rush Do Not Disclose At Least
`the Below Claimed Features
`“a microprocessor connected to said movement sensor and to said
`power source, said microprocessor capable of receiving, interpreting,
`storing and responding to said movement data based on user-defined
`operational parameters, detecting a first user-defined event based on
`the movement data and at least one of the user-defined operational
`parameters regarding the movement data, and storing first event
`information related to the detected first user-defined event along with
`first time stamp information reflecting a time at which the movement
`data causing the first user-defined event occurred”
`
`Claim 1
`POR of 565, at 18, 25 and 27
`Demonstrative Exhibit – Not Evidence
`
`4
`
`

`

`EX2001, at 23 (¶¶ 45-46); POR of 564, at 7
`Demonstrative Exhibit – Not Evidence
`
`Figure A2
`
`5
`
`

`

`Roles/Functions of Processor as Disclosed in Stewart
`• “A processor 52 controls data sampling and storage operations with
`respect to data from an A/D Converter 46 for storagein a Personal
`Computer Memory Control Interface Adapter (PCMCIA) card installed
`in a PCMCIA Interface 50.” EX1004, 5:56-60
`• “The processor 52 controls the storage of data from the A/D
`Converter 46 to the data storage51.” EX1004, 8:58-59
`• The processor 52 comprises any conventional processor device,
`including a microcontroller or a microprocessor, and controls the
`operation of the HAT system.” EX1004, 8:59-62
`
`POR of 564, at 5-6, 18-19
`Demonstrative Exhibit – Not Evidence
`
`6
`
`

`

`Roles/Functions of Processor as Disclosed in Stewart
`
`• “Program random-access memory and read-only memory
`(RAM/ROM) 48 is provided for storage and operation of the software
`program which the processor 52 runs.” EX1004, 9:43-45
`• “Storage of data from the outputs of the accelerometers 10-12 is
`started and stopped by the processor 52 via commands transmitted
`through the serial control interface 42.” EX1004, 11:29-32
`• “The operating software of the processor 52 monitors the serial
`control interface 42 for the presence of commands. These commands
`set the general parameters of the data storage operation of the HAT.”
`EX1004, 11:51-54
`POR of 564, at 5-6, 18-19
`Demonstrative Exhibit – Not Evidence
`
`7
`
`

`

`Stewart Never Teaches the Processor Performs the
`Following
`• “For this purpose HAT could be modified to record in real-time
`detailed data only when the accelerations exceed a defined
`threshold.” EX1004, 5:4-7
`• “The data is recorded in real-time, but may be processed in either
`real-time as the data is recorded, or at a later time so as to integrate
`and otherwise determine the translational, angular and normal
`components of acceleration of the sportsperson's head.” EX1004,
`5:7-11
`
`PO Sur-Reply of 564, at 7-11
`Demonstrative Exhibit – Not Evidence
`
`8
`
`

`

`Stewart Never Teaches the Processor Performs the
`Following
`• “For instance, in boxing, it is possible to correlate certain responses of
`the accelerometers 10-12 with desirable punches exceeding a
`predetermined threshold, and thus be processed and scored at a
`ringside receiver.” EX1004, 14:6-9
`• “It might also be possible to determine if a football player is
`improperly using his helmet (e.g., illegal spearing).” EX1004, 14:9-11
`
`PO Sur-Reply of 564, at 7-11
`Demonstrative Exhibit – Not Evidence
`
`9
`
`

`

`Fischell Teaches Setting Threshold at Sensor
`
`“The accelerometer 26 behaves as a switch and is closed momentarily
`when an accelerating impulse, above a set threshold level, is detected,
`and automatically resets after the acceleration impulse subsides.”
`EX2003, 4:2-6
`
`PO Sur-Reply of 564, at 9-10
`Demonstrative Exhibit – Not Evidence
`
`10
`
`

`

`EX2001, at 25 (¶¶ 47-48); POR of 564, at 10
`Demonstrative Exhibit – Not Evidence
`
`Figure A3
`
`11
`
`

`

`Rush Adds Nothing
`
`• Rush merely provides that accelerometers are adjustable
`• Fischell already provided that accelerometers are adjustable
`• “A threshold level between 2 g's and 5 g's can be selected as
`values large enough to avoid aversive stimulation as a result of
`accelerations experienced in normal activity, and yet small
`enough to detect even a non-damaging impulse to the head.”
`EX2003, 4:12-16
`
`PO Sur-Reply of 564, at 9-10
`Demonstrative Exhibit – Not Evidence
`
`12
`
`

`

`Rush Adds Nothing
`
`• “It may also be advantageous to provide a recording means 148 which is
`cooperable with the receiving means 142 to record instances in which the
`potentially injurious activity has taken place.” EX1006, 10:20-23
`• “The recording means may record the time and date of each instance in
`which the potentially injurious activity occurs.” EX1006, 10:26-28
`
`PO Sur-Reply of 564, at 16-17
`Demonstrative Exhibit – Not Evidence
`
`13
`
`

`

`Richardson and Stewart Do Not Disclose At
`Least the Below Claimed Features
`• “storing, in said memory, first event information related to the
`detected first user-defined event along with first time stamp
`information reflecting a time at which the movement data causing the
`first user-defined event occurred” Claim 20
`• “storing first event information related to the detected first user-
`defined event along with first time stamp information reflecting a
`time at which the movement data causing the first user-defined event
`occurred” Claim 1
`
`POR of 564, at 34; POR of 565, at 37
`Demonstrative Exhibit – Not Evidence
`
`14
`
`

`

`EX2001, at 26 (¶¶ 50-51); POR of 564, at 12
`Demonstrative Exhibit – Not Evidence
`
`Figure A4
`
`15
`
`

`

`Garmin’s Arguments Re Richardson Fall Outside of the
`Phillip’s Claim Construction Standard – Even So,
`Richardson Still Does Not Meet Claim Limitations
`• Nothing in Richardson teaches that anything is stored when the cruise
`control alarm is triggered
`• Richardson reports a cruise control alarm trigger whenever the user's
`locomotor speed goes consistently into or consistently out of the
`chosen speed band
`
`PO Sur-Reply, at 21-24; EX1009, 18:30-33 and Table 2, 29:30-36
`Demonstrative Exhibit – Not Evidence
`
`16
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket