throbber

`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`
`
`
`
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. and
`CHOICE HOTELS INTERNATIONAL, INC.
`Petitioners,
`
`v.
`
`FALL LINE PATENTS, LLC.
`Patent Owner
`
`------------------------
`
`Case: IPR2018-00535
`Patent 9,454,748 B2
`
`------------------------
`
`Before MICHELLE N. WORMMEESTER, SHEILA F. McSHANE, and JOHN R.
`KENNY, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`
`DECLARATION OF JONATHAN I. DETRIXHE
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Petitioners – Exhibit 1016, p. 1
`
`

`

`
`
`I, Jonathan I. Detrixhe, declare the following:
`
`1.
`
`I am an associate at Reed Smith, LLP and represent Uber
`
`Technologies, Inc. and Choice Hotels International, Inc. (collectively,
`
`“Petitioners”) in this proceeding. I submit this Declaration in support of Petitioners
`
`Response to the May 21, 2018 Order by the Board. I have personal knowledge of
`
`the matters set forth in this Declaration. If called as a witness, I could and would
`
`competently testify to these matters.
`
`2.
`
`I prepared the word-count certification for the Petition filed in this
`
`proceeding, IPR2018-00535 (“Petition”). In doing so, I relied on Microsoft Word’s
`
`(“Word”) word-count feature. In particular, I relied on Word’s word-count feature
`
`to count the words in Sections I and III-VIII. I did not include Section II, which
`
`addresses mandatory notices, because it is exempt under 37 CFR § 42.24(a).
`
`3.
`
`To perform this word count, first I selected the words in Section I.
`
`Then, I clicked on Word’s word count feature, which provided 86 words, as shown
`
`below1:
`
`
`1 I obtained the images in ¶¶ 3-5 of this declaration by repeating the steps I used to
`
`prepare the certification for the Petition.
`
`Petitioners – Exhibit 1016, p. 2
`
`
`

`

`
`
`4.
`
`Next, I selected the words in Sections III-VIII. My selection included
`
`the words added in textboxes as annotations to prior art figures. These words were
`
`typed in plain text. For example, as shown below, my selection included the
`
`textboxes with the words “Handheld computing device” and “Originating
`
`computer” on page 20 of the Petition, which were added in the textboxes as plain
`
`text to annotate a prior art figure:
`
`Petitioners – Exhibit 1016, p. 3
`
`
`

`

`
`
`5.
`
`After selecting the words in Sections III-VIII, I clicked on Word’s
`
`word count feature, which provided 13,913 words, as shown below. Because I had
`
`selected the box to “[i]nclude textboxes, footnotes and endnotes,” and because
`
`each textbox was included in my selection, I believed that the count of 13,913
`
`words for Sections III-VIII included every annotated word typed in a textbox.
`
`Petitioners – Exhibit 1016, p. 4
`
`
`

`

`
`
`6.
`
`I obtained the final word count of 13,999 to which I certified by
`
`adding the count of 86 words for Section I to the count of 13,913 words for
`
`Sections III-VIII.
`
`7.
`
`After reviewing the allegations in Patent Owner’s Preliminary
`
`Response, I provided Patent Owner a Word version of the Petition to allow it to
`
`verify the accuracy of my word count. In addition, during a call with Patent
`
`Owner’s counsel, I explained how I had relied on Word’s word-count feature to
`
`obtain the total count of 13,999. Not satisfied, Patent Owner’s counsel requested a
`
`Word copy of the Petition that included only those words I had selected for
`
`inclusion in the word count. I prepared and provided such a copy. When I selected
`
`Petitioners – Exhibit 1016, p. 5
`
`
`

`

`every word in this document (for example, by typing Crtl-A) and ran a word count,
`
`Word again provided a total count of 13,999:
`
`
`
`The count of 13,999 shown above was obtained by selecting all of the words,
`
`including the textboxes with annotated words, and performing a count with
`
`instructions to “[i]nclude textboxes, footnotes, and endnotes.”
`
`8.
`
`I understand that Patent Owner used a different method to count the
`
`words in this copy. In particular, I understand that Patent Owner ran a word count
`
`without selecting any words. If I do that, I obtain a count of 14,123 words:
`
`Petitioners – Exhibit 1016, p. 6
`
`
`

`

`
`
`9.
`
` After investigating Patent Owner’s allegations, I learned that Word’s
`
`word count feature does not include words present in selected textboxes, even
`
`though Word’s word count feature indicates that it includes textboxes. For
`
`example, if I select only the figure and textboxes found on page 20 of the Petition,
`
`Word provides a word count of 0 (and thus omits the textboxes with the words
`
`“Handheld computing device” and “Originating computer”)—even though the
`
`textboxes are selected and the option to “[i]nclude textboxes, footnotes, and
`
`endnotes” is selected:
`
`Petitioners – Exhibit 1016, p. 7
`
`
`

`

`
`
`10. Accordingly, in retrospect, it appears that the provided count of
`
`13,999 words did not include the annotated words present in textboxes. Based on
`
`the difference between the 14,123 words obtained without selecting any words, and
`
`the 13,999 words obtained by selecting every word, it appears that the total number
`
`of annotated words in textboxes is 124.
`
`11. However, at the time of filing the Petition, I had no knowledge that
`
`the count provided by Word had omitted the annotated words in textboxes. To the
`
`contrary, because each textbox was included in my selections, and because I
`
`selected the option to “[i]nclude textboxes, footnotes and endnotes,” I believed that
`
`Petitioners – Exhibit 1016, p. 8
`
`
`

`

`the total count of 13,999 words included every annotated word added in the
`
`textboxes. It was not until after Fall Line filed its Preliminary Response that I
`
`realized that Word had not in fact included the selected textboxes in its word count.
`
`12.
`
`I hereby declare that all statements made herein of my own
`
`knowledge are true and that all statements made on information and belief are
`
`believed to be true; and further that these statements are made with knowledge that
`
`willful false statements and the like are punishable by fine, imprisonment, or both,
`
`under Section 1001 of Title 18 of the U.S. Code.
`
`
`
`
`
`Dated: May 28, 2018
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`Jonathan I. Detrixhe
`
`
`
`Petitioners – Exhibit 1016, p. 9
`
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket