`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
`United States Patent and Trademark Office
`Address: COMMISSIONER FOR PATENTS
`P.O. Box 1450
`Alexandria1 Virginia 22313- 1450
`www.uspto.gov
`
`APPLICATION NO.
`
`
`
`
` F ING DATE
`
`FIRST NAMED INVENTOR
`
`ATTORNEY DOCKET NO.
`
`
`
`
`CONF {MATION NO.
`
`12/910,706
`
`10/22/2010
`
`J. David Payne
`
`71855/10—351
`
`8703
`
`03/16/2011
`7590
`22206
`FELLERS SNIDER BLANKENSHIP
`BAILEY & TIPPENS
`THE KENNEDY BUILDING
`321 SOUTH BOSTON SUITE 800
`TULSA, OK 74103-3318
`
`EXAMINER
`
`TRAN, NGHI V
`
`ART UNIT
`
`2451
`
`MAIL DATE
`
`03/16/201 1
`
`PAPER NUMBER
`
`DELIVERY MODE
`
`PAPER
`
`Please find below and/or attached an Office communication concerning this application or proceeding.
`
`The time period for reply, if any, is set in the attached communication.
`
`PTOL—90A (Rev. 04/07)
`
`Petitioners — Exhibit 1007, p. 1
`
`Petitioners – Exhibit 1007, p. 1
`
`

`

`
`Application No.
`Applicant(s)
`
`Office Action Summary
`
`12/910,706
`
`Examiner
`NGHI v. TRAN
`
`PAYNE, J. DAVID
`
`Art Unit
`2451
`
`-- The MAILING DA TE of this communication appears on the cover sheet with the correspondence address --
`Period for Reply
`
`A SHORTENED STATUTORY PERIOD FOR REPLY IS SET TO EXPIRE 3 MONTH(S) OR THIRTY (30) DAYS,
`WHICHEVER IS LONGER, FROM THE MAILING DATE OF THIS COMMUNICATION
`Extensions of time may be available under the provisions of 37 CFR1. 136( a).
`In no event however may a reply be timely filed
`after SIX () MONTHS from the mailing date of this communication.
`If NO period for reply is specified above, the maximum statutory period will apply and will expire SIX (6) MONTHS from the mailing date of this communication.
`-
`- Failure to reply within the set or extended period for reply will, by statute, cause the application to become ABANDONED (35 U.S.C. § 133).
`Any reply received by the Office later than three months after the mailing date ofthis communication, even if timely filed, may reduce any
`earned patent term adjustment. See 37 CFR 1.704(b).
`
`Status
`
`1)|Zl Responsive to communication(s) filed on 10/22/2010.
`
`a)I:l This action is FINAL.
`
`2b)IZ| This action is non-final.
`
`3)|:l Since this application is in condition for allowance except for formal matters, prosecution as to the merits is
`
`closed in accordance with the practice under Exparte Quay/e, 1935 CD. 11, 453 O.G. 213.
`
`Disposition of Claims
`
`4)IXI Claim(s) 1-11 is/are pending in the application.
`
`4a) Of the above claim(s) _ is/are withdrawn from consideration.
`
`5)I:| Claim(s) _ is/are allowed.
`
`6)|Zl Claim(s)_1-11 is/are rejected.
`
`7)I:l Claim(s) _ is/are objected to.
`
`8)I:l Claim(s) _ are subject to restriction and/or election requirement.
`
`Application Papers
`
`9)I:I The specification is objected to by the Examiner.
`
`OH] The drawing(s) filed on _ is/are: a)|:l accepted or b)I:l objected to by the Examiner.
`
`Applicant may not request that any objection to the drawing(s) be held in abeyance. See 37 CFR 1.85(a).
`
`Replacement drawing sheet(s) including the correction is required if the drawing(s) is objected to. See 37 CFR 1.121 (d).
`
`11)|:l The oath or declaration is objected to by the Examiner. Note the attached Office Action or form PTO-152.
`
`Priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119
`
`12)I:I Acknowledgment is made of a claim for foreign priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119(a)-(d) or (f).
`
`a)|:l AII
`
`b)I:l Some * c)|:l None of:
`
`1.I:I Certified copies of the priority documents have been received.
`
`2.|:I Certified copies of the priority documents have been received in Application No. _
`
`3.I:I Copies of the certified copies of the priority documents have been received in this National Stage
`
`application from the International Bureau (PCT Rule 17.2(a)).
`
`* See the attached detailed Office action for a list of the certified copies not received.
`
`Attachment(s)
`
`1) X Notice of References Cited (PTO-892)
`2) D Notice of Draftsperson‘s Patent Drawing Review (PTO-948)
`3) El Information Disclosure Statement(s) (PTO/SB/08)
`Paper No(s)/Mai| Date _.
`US. Patent and Trademark Office
`
`4) D Interview Summary (PTO-413)
`Paper N°(5 )/Mai| Date. _
`5)I:I Notice of Informal Patent Application
`)6|:| Other:
`
`PTOL-326 (Rev. 08-06)
`
`Office Action Summary
`
`Part of PEper No./Mai| Date 20110309
`.
`.
`Petltloners — xhibit 1007, p 2
`
`
`
`Petitioners – Exhibit 1007, p. 2
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 12/910,706
`
`Page 2
`
`Art Unit: 2451
`
`DETAILED ACTION
`
`1.
`
`Claims 1-11 are presented for examination.
`
`Double Patenting
`
`2.
`
`The nonstatutory double patenting rejection is based on a judicially created
`
`doctrine grounded in public policy (a policy reflected in the statute) so as to prevent the
`
`unjustified or improper timewise extension of the “right to exclude” granted by a patent
`
`and to prevent possible harassment by multiple assignees. A nonstatutory
`
`obviousness-type double patenting rejection is appropriate where the conflicting claims
`
`are not identical, but at least one examined application claim is not patentably distinct
`
`from the reference claim(s) because the examined application claim is either anticipated
`
`by, or would have been obvious over, the reference claim(s). See, e.g., In re Berg, 140
`
`F.3d 1428, 46 USPQ2d 1226 (Fed. Cir. 1998); In re Goodman, 11 F.3d 1046, 29
`
`USPQ2d 2010 (Fed. Cir. 1993); In re Longi, 759 F.2d 887, 225 USPQ 645 (Fed. Cir.
`
`1985); In re Van Ornum, 686 F.2d 937, 214 USPQ 761 (CCPA 1982); In re Vogel, 422
`
`F.2d 438, 164 USPQ 619 (CCPA 1970); and In re Thorington, 418 F.2d 528, 163
`
`USPQ 644 (CCPA 1969).
`
`A timely filed terminal disclaimer in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321 (c) or 1.321(d)
`
`may be used to overcome an actual or provisional rejection based on a nonstatutory
`
`double patenting ground provided the conflicting application or patent either is shown to
`
`Petitioners — Exhibit 1007, p. 3
`
`Petitioners – Exhibit 1007, p. 3
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 12/910,706
`
`Page 3
`
`Art Unit: 2451
`
`be commonly owned with this application, or claims an invention made as a result of
`
`activities undertaken within the scope of a joint research agreement.
`
`Effective January 1, 1994, a registered attorney or agent of record may sign a
`
`terminal disclaimer. A terminal disclaimer signed by the assignee must fully comply with
`
`37 CFR 3.73(b).
`
`3.
`
`Claims 1-11 of the instance application are rejected on the ground of
`
`nonstatutory obviousness-type double patenting as being unpatentable over claims 1-14
`
`of U.S. Patent No. 7,822,816. Although the conflicting claims are not identical, they are
`
`not patentably distinct from each other because the limitation of claims 1-11 of the
`
`instance application is overlapping with the limitation of claims 1-14 of U.S. Patent No.
`
`7,822,816 as following:
`
`U.S. Patent No. 7,266,600
`
`Instant Application No. 11/738,732
`
`1. A method for managing data including
`
`1. A method for managing data including
`
`the steps of:
`
`the steps of:
`
`a) creating a questionnaire comprising a
`
`(a) creating a questionnaire comprising a
`
`series of questions;
`
`series of questions;
`
`(b)
`
`tokenizing said questionnaire;
`
`(b)
`
`tokenizing said questionnaire; thereby
`
`thereby producing a plurality of tokens
`
`producing a plurality of tokens
`
`representing said questionnaire;
`
`representing said questionnaire;
`
`(c) establishing a first wireless modem
`
`
`Petitioners — Exhibit 1007, p. 4
`
`Petitioners – Exhibit 1007, p. 4
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 12/910,706
`
`Page 4
`
`Art Unit: 2451
`
`or wireless LAN network connection with
`
`a remote computing device;
`
`(d)
`
`transmitting said plurality of tokens to
`
`(c) transmitting said plurality of tokens to a
`
`a remote computing device via said first
`
`remote computing device;
`
`device to collect a response from a user;
`
`wireless modem or wireless LAN network
`
`connection;
`
`e) terminating said first wireless modem
`
`or wireless LAN network connection with
`
`said remote computing device;
`
`(f) after said first wireless modem or
`
`(d) executing at least a portion of said
`
`wireless LAN network connection is
`
`plurality of tokens representing said
`
`terminated executing at least a portion of
`
`questionnaire at said remote computing
`
`said plurality of tokens representing said
`
`questionnaire at said remote computing
`
`device to collect a response from a user;
`
`(9) establishing a second wireless
`
`modem or wireless LAN network
`
`connection between said remote
`
`computing device and a server;
`
`(h) after said second wireless modem or
`
`(e)
`
`transmitting at least a portion of said
`
`wireless LAN network connection is
`
`response from the user to a server via a
`
`
`network; and
`established transmitting at least a portion
`
`
`Petitioners — Exhibit 1007, p. 5
`
`Petitioners – Exhibit 1007, p. 5
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 12/910,706
`
`Page 5
`
`Art Unit: 2451
`
`of said response from the user to said
`
`server via said second wireless modem or
`
`said server.
`
`wireless LAN network connection; and
`
`(i) storing said transmitted response at
`
`(f) storing said response at said server.
`
`4.
`
`Therefore, the limitation of claims 1-11 of the instance application is anticipated
`
`by the limitations of claims 1-14 of US. Patent No 7,822,816, and as such is
`
`unpatentable for obvious-type double patenting.
`
`Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102
`
`5.
`
`The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that
`
`form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action:
`
`A person shall be entitled to a patent unless —
`
`(e) the invention was described in (1) an application for patent, published under section 122(b), by
`another filed in the United States before the invention by the applicant for patent or (2) a patent
`granted on an application for patent by another filed in the United States before the invention by the
`applicant for patent, except that an international application filed under the treaty defined in section
`351 (a) shall have the effects for purposes of this subsection of an application filed in the United States
`only if the international application designated the United States and was published under Article 21(2)
`of such treaty in the English language.
`
`6.
`
`Claims 1 and 5 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(e) as being anticipated by Lew
`
`et al., United States Patent Publication Number 2004/0210472 (hereinafter Lew).
`
`7.
`
`With respect to claim 1, Lew teaches a method for managing data [see abstract]
`
`including the steps of:
`
`Petitioners — Exhibit 1007, p. 6
`
`Petitioners – Exhibit 1007, p. 6
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 12/910,706
`
`Page 6
`
`Art Unit: 2451
`
`(a)
`
`creating a questionnaire [= survey] comprising a series of questions
`
`[paragraphs 0005-0009];
`
`(b)
`
`tokenizing said questionnaire [= encrypted survey information, paragraph
`
`0013]; thereby producing a plurality of tokens representing said questionnaire
`
`[paragraphs 0005-0009];
`
`(c)
`
`transmitting said plurality of tokens to a remote computing device [= the
`
`survey transmitter may transmit to the remote responding device in either a wired or a
`
`wireless manner, paragraph 0053];
`
`(d)
`
`executing at least a portion of said plurality of tokens representing said
`
`questionnaire at said remote computing device to collect a response [= feedback] from a
`
`user [= feed back from a user, paragraph 0036];
`
`(e)
`
`transmitting at least a portion of said response from the user to a server [=
`
`a central facility] via a network [paragraph 0050]; and
`
`(f)
`
`storing said response at said server [= all feedback is transmitted to the
`
`central facility, 86100 of fig.2 and paragraph 0048].
`
`8.
`
`With respect to claim 5, Lew further teaches wherein the transmission of said
`
`tokens in step (c) occurs via the network of step (e) [fig.3].
`
`9.
`
`Claim 7 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(e) as being anticipated by Sendowski et
`
`al., United States Patent Publication Number 2003/0198934 (hereinafter Sendowski).
`
`Petitioners — Exhibit 1007, p. 7
`
`Petitioners – Exhibit 1007, p. 7
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 12/910,706
`
`Page 7
`
`Art Unit: 2451
`
`10. With respect to claim 7, Sendowski teaches a method for collecting survey data
`
`from a user [see abstract] comprising:
`
`(a)
`
`designing a questionnaire [= survey] having branching logic [= branch
`
`script object 124] on a first computer platform [= web server 121] [paragraphs 0023-
`
`0028 and 0041 -0048];
`
`(b)
`
`automatically transferring said designed questionnaire to at least one
`
`loosely networked computer [= automatically generate an HTML question page or
`
`question form, paragraph 0024-0031];
`
`(c)
`
`executing said transferred questionnaire on said loosely networked
`
`computer, thereby collecting responses from the user [see abstract];
`
`(d)
`
`automatically transferring via the loose network any responses so
`
`collected to a central computer [= medical survey provider 120] [paragraph 0020 and
`
`table 3]; and,
`
`(e)
`
`making available on the Web any responses transferred to said central
`
`computer in step (d) [fig.1].
`
`Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103
`
`11.
`
`The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103(a) which forms the basis for all
`
`obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action:
`
`(a) A patent may not be obtained though the invention is not identically disclosed or described as set
`forth in section 102 of this title, if the differences between the subject matter sought to be patented and
`the prior art are such that the subject matter as a whole would have been obvious at the time the
`invention was made to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which said subject matter pertains.
`Patentability shall not be negatived by the manner in which the invention was made.
`
`Petitioners — Exhibit 1007, p. 8
`
`Petitioners – Exhibit 1007, p. 8
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 12/910,706
`
`Page 8
`
`Art Unit: 2451
`
`12.
`
`Claims 2-4, 6, and 9-11 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being
`
`unpatentable over Lew as applied in claim 1 above, in view of Sendowski et al., U.S.
`
`Patent Application Publication No. 2003/0198934 (hereinafter Sendowski).
`
`13. With respect to claim 2, Lew does not explicitly show the step of: (g) translating
`
`said response to a format recognizable by a particular computer program; and (h)
`
`accessing the translated response from a computer executing said particular computer
`
`program.
`
`In a method of managing data, Sendowski discloses the step of: (g) translating
`
`said response to a format recognizable [= XML data structural] by a particular computer
`
`program [= branching script engine, paragraphs 0007-0008]; and (h) accessing the
`
`translated response from a computer executing said particular computer program
`
`[paragraphs 0034-0053 and fig.2].
`
`Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the
`
`time of the invention was made to modify Lew in view of Sendowski by accessing a
`
`translated response to a format recognizable because this feature provides a framework
`
`of reusable software object implementing the creation and execution of any question-
`
`answer branching scripts [Sendowski, see abstract].
`
`It is for this reason that one of
`
`ordinary skill in the art at the time of the invention would have been motivated in order to
`
`support thousands of concurrent users when it is required [Sendowski, paragraph
`
`00051
`
`Petitioners — Exhibit 1007, p. 9
`
`Petitioners – Exhibit 1007, p. 9
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 12/910,706
`
`Page 9
`
`Art Unit: 2451
`
`14. With respect to claim 3, Lew does not explicitly show wherein step (a) includes
`
`the sub-steps of:(a) creating a questionnaire by: (i) entering a series of questions into a
`
`questionnaire design computer program; (ii) identifying within said questionnaire design
`
`computer program the type of response allowed for each question of said series of
`
`questions; and (iii) identifying within said questionnaire design computer program a
`
`branching path in said questionnaire for each possible response to each question of
`
`said series of questions.
`
`In a method of managing data, Sendowski discloses wherein step (a) includes
`
`the sub-steps of:(a) creating a questionnaire by: (i) entering a series of questions into a
`
`questionnaire design computer program [paragraphs 0034-0054]; (ii) identifying within
`
`said questionnaire design computer program the type of response allowed for each
`
`question of said series of questions [= answer types, paragraph 0019 and table 2]; and
`
`(iii) identifying within said questionnaire design computer program a branching path in
`
`said questionnaire for each possible response to each question of said series of
`
`questions [paragraph 0018 and table 1].
`
`Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the
`
`time of the invention was made to modify Lew in view of Sendowski by identifying within
`
`said questionnaire design computer program a branching path in said questionnaire for
`
`each possible response to each question of said series of questions because this
`
`feature provides a framework of reusable software object implementing the creation and
`
`execution of any question-answer branching scripts [Sendowski, see abstract].
`
`It is for
`
`this reason that one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of the invention would have
`
`Petitioners — Exhibit 1007, p. 10
`
`Petitioners – Exhibit 1007, p. 10
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 12/910,706
`
`Page 10
`
`Art Unit: 2451
`
`been motivated in order to support thousands of concurrent users when it is required
`
`[Sendowski, paragraph 0005].
`
`15. With respect to claim 4, Lew does not explicitly show wherein step (b) includes
`
`the sub-steps of: (b) tokenizing said questionnaire thereby producing a plurality of
`
`tokens representing said questionnaire by: (i) assigning at least one token to each
`
`question of said series of questions; (ii) assigning at least one token to each response
`
`called for in said series of questions to identify the type of response required; and (iii)
`
`assigning at least one token to each branch in said questionnaire to identify the required
`
`program control associated with said branch.
`
`In a method of managing data, Sendowski discloses wherein step (b) includes
`
`the sub-steps of: (b) tokenizing said questionnaire thereby producing a plurality of
`
`tokens representing said questionnaire by: (i) assigning at least one token to each
`
`question of said series of questions [= a question uses tokens, paragraph 0019]; (ii)
`
`assigning at least one token to each response called for in said series of questions to
`
`identify the type of response required [= allows the answer to be collected into a name
`
`toke, paragraph 0020]; and (iii) assigning at least one token to each branch in said
`
`questionnaire to identify the required program control associated with said branch
`
`[paragraphs 0041 -0049].
`
`Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the
`
`time of the invention was made to modify Lew in view of Sendowski by assigning at
`
`least one token to each question of said series of questions, to each response called for
`
`Petitioners — Exhibit 1007, p. 11
`
`Petitioners – Exhibit 1007, p. 11
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 12/910,706
`
`Page 11
`
`Art Unit: 2451
`
`in said series of questions, and to each branch in said questionnaire because this
`
`feature provides a framework of reusable software object implementing the creation and
`
`execution of any question-answer branching scripts [Sendowski, see abstract].
`
`It is for
`
`this reason that one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of the invention would have
`
`been motivated in order to support thousands of concurrent users when it is required
`
`[Sendowski, paragraph 0005].
`
`16. With respect to claims 6 and 9, Lew teaches a method for managing data
`
`transfers between computers [see abstract and fig.1] including the steps of:
`
`(a)
`
`creating a questionnaire [= survey] at a first site [= modulator 10] in a first
`
`computer [= media conveyor 20] located at a second site [paragraphs 0026-0029], said
`
`first site and said second site being connected by a network [fig.1];
`
`(b)
`
`transmitting said question to a remote computer [= remote responding
`
`device] via said network, said remote computer running an OIS [paragraph 0053];
`
`However, Lew does not explicitly show step (c) modifying said questionnaire with
`
`incremental changes at a third site in said first computer located at said second site;
`
`and step (d) modifying said questionnaire in said remote computer with said incremental
`
`changes.
`
`In a method of managing data, Sendowski discloses step (c) modifying said
`
`questionnaire with incremental changes at a third site in said first computer located at
`
`said second site [= TSLastModified of table 2 and paragraph 0058]; and step (d)
`
`Petitioners — Exhibit 1007, p. 12
`
`Petitioners – Exhibit 1007, p. 12
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 12/910,706
`
`Page 12
`
`Art Unit: 2451
`
`modifying said questionnaire in said remote computer with said incremental changes [=
`
`TSLastModified of table 2 and paragraph 0058].
`
`Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the
`
`time of the invention was made to modify Lew in view of Sendowski by modifying said
`
`questionnaire with incremental changes at a third site in said first computer located at
`
`said second site and modifying said questionnaire in said remote computer with said
`
`incremental changes because this feature provides a framework of reusable software
`
`object implementing the creation and execution of any question-answer branching
`
`scripts [Sendowski, see abstract].
`
`It is for this reason that one of ordinary skill in the art
`
`at the time of the invention would have been motivated in order to support thousands of
`
`concurrent users when it is required [Sendowski, paragraph 0005].
`
`17. With respect to claim 10, Lew further teaches wherein said first site and said third
`
`site are the same [fig.1].
`
`18. With respect to claim 11, Lew further teaches wherein said third site is at said
`
`remote computer [fig.1].
`
`19.
`
`Claim 8 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being unpatentable over
`
`Sendowski, as applied in claim 7 above, in view of Joao, U.S. Patent Application
`
`Publication No. 2001/0056374 (hereinafter Joao).
`
`Petitioners — Exhibit 1007, p. 13
`
`Petitioners – Exhibit 1007, p. 13
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 12/910,706
`
`Page 13
`
`Art Unit: 2451
`
`20. With respect to claim 8, Sendowski does not explicitly show assessing a charge
`
`for each transferred response received by said central computer.
`
`In a method for collecting survey data, Joao discloses assessing a charge [i.e.
`
`compensation, rewards, rebates and/or incentives can be provided for viewing,
`
`reviewing, participating in and/or interacting with, the entire survey, poll and/or
`
`questionnaire, paragraph 0230] for each transferred response received by said central
`
`computer [paragraphs 0228-0037].
`
`Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the
`
`time of the invention was made to modify Sendowski in view of Joao by assessing a
`
`charge for each transferred response received by said central computer because this
`
`feature can receive compensation, a reward, a rebate, and/or an incentive [Joao,
`
`paragraph 0009].
`
`It is for this reason that one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of
`
`the invention would have been motivated in order to facilitate commerce between any
`
`parties and/or any number of parties [Joao, paragraph 0009].
`
`Conclusion
`
`21.
`
`Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the
`
`examiner should be directed to Nghi V. Tran whose telephone number is (571) 272-
`
`4067. The examiner can normally be reached on Monday-Friday.
`
`If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s
`
`supervisor, John Follansbee can be reached on (571) 272-3964. The fax phone
`
`Petitioners — Exhibit 1007, p. 14
`
`Petitioners – Exhibit 1007, p. 14
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 12/910,706
`
`Page 14
`
`Art Unit: 2451
`
`number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571 -
`
`273-8300.
`
`Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the
`
`Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for
`
`published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR.
`
`Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only.
`
`For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should
`
`you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic
`
`Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free).
`
`/John Follansbee/
`
`Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2451
`
`Petitioners — Exhibit 1007, p. 15
`
`Petitioners – Exhibit 1007, p. 15
`
`

`

`IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`
`
`Applicant(s): Payne
`
`Confirmation No.2 8703
`
`Application No.:
`
`12/910,706
`
`Art Unit: 2451
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Attorney Docket No.: 71855/10-351
`
`Filed:
`
`10/22/2010
`
`SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR DATA
`Title:
`MANAGEMENT
`
`Examiner:
`
`Nghi V. Tran
`
`
`
`MAIL STOP AMENDMENT
`
`Commissioner for Patents
`
`PO. Box 1450
`
`Alexandria, VA 22313—1450
`
`
`AMENDMENT AND RESPONSE
`
`This paper is filed in response to the Office Action mailed 03/16/2011. Please consider
`
`the instant filing to be a Petition for a Three Month Extension of Time to Respond, A USPTO
`
`credit card payment form PTO 2038 is attached to this filing or charge to a credit card will
`
`be authorized through EFS Web filing.
`
`Please amend the application as follows:
`
`Petitioners — Exhibit 1007, p. 16
`
`Petitioners – Exhibit 1007, p. 16
`
`

`

`In the claims:
`
`This listing of claims will replace all prior versions and listings of the claims in this
`
`application.
`
`Please enter new Claims 12 ~— 3].
`
`1.
`
`(Previously Presented) A method for managing data including the steps of:
`
`(a)
`
`creating a questionnaire comprising a series of questions;
`
`(b)
`
`tokenizing said questionnaire; thereby producing a plurality of tokens representing
`
`said questionnaire;
`
`(c)
`
`(d)
`
`transmitting said plurality of tokens to a remote computing device;
`
`executing at least a portion of said plurality of tokens representing said
`
`questionnaire at said remote computing device to collect a response from a user;
`
`(e)
`
`transmitting at least a portion of said response from the user to a server via a
`
`network; and
`
`(t)
`
`storing said response at said server.
`
`2.
`
`(Previously Presented) The method for managing data of claim 1 further comprising the
`
`step of:
`
`(g)
`
`translating said response to a format recognizable by a particular computer
`
`program; and
`
`(h)
`
`accessing the translated response from a computer executing said particular
`
`computer program.
`
`Petitioners — Exhibit 1007, p. 17
`
`Petitioners – Exhibit 1007, p. 17
`
`

`

`(Previously Presented) The method for managing data of claim 1 wherein step (a)
`
`includes the substeps of:
`
`(a)
`
`creating a questionnaire by:
`
`(i)
`
`entering a series of questions into a questionnaire design computer
`
`program;
`
`(ii)
`
`identifying within said questionnaire design computer program the type of
`
`response allowed for each question of said series of questions; and
`
`(iii)
`
`identifying within said questionnaire design computer program a
`
`branching path in said questionnaire for each possible response to each
`
`question of said series of questions.
`
`(Previously Presented) The method for managing data of claim 1 wherein step (b)
`
`includes the substeps of:
`
`(b)
`
`tokenizing said questionnaire thereby producing a plurality of tokens representing
`
`said questionnaire by:
`
`(i)
`
`assigning at least one token to each question of said series of questions;
`
`(ii)
`
`assigning at least one token to each response called for in said series of
`
`questions to identify the type of response required; and
`
`(iii)
`
`assigning at least one token to each branch in said questionnaire to identify
`
`the required program control associated with said branch.
`
`(Previously Presented) The method of data management of claim 1 wherein the
`
`transmission of said tokens in step (0) occurs Via the network of step (e).
`
`Petitioners — Exhibit 1007, p. 18
`
`Petitioners – Exhibit 1007, p. 18
`
`

`

`(Previously Presented) A method for modifying a questionnaire used in data
`
`management according to the method of claim 1 including the steps of:
`
`(a)
`
`making at least one incremental change to a portion of the questionnaire;
`
`(b)
`
`tokenizing said at least one incremental change to said questionnaire;
`
`(c)
`
`transmitting at least a portion of said tokens resulting from step (b) to a remote
`
`computing device, said transmitted tokens comprising less than the entire
`
`tokenized questionnaire;
`
`(d)
`
`incorporating said transmitted tokens into said questionnaire at said remote
`
`computing device.
`
`(Previously Presented) A method for collecting survey data from a user comprising:
`
`(a)
`
`designing a questionnaire having branching logic on a first computer platform;
`
`(b)
`
`automatically transferring said designed questionnaire to at least one loosely
`
`networked computer;
`
`(c)
`
`executing said transferred questionnaire on said loosely networked computer,
`
`thereby collecting responses from the user;
`
`(d)
`
`automatically transferring via the loose network any responses so collected to a
`
`central computer; and,
`
`(e)
`
`making available on the Web any responses transferred to said central computer in
`
`step (d).
`
`Petitioners — Exhibit 1007, p. 19
`
`Petitioners – Exhibit 1007, p. 19
`
`

`

`(Previously Presented) The method for collecting survey data according to claim 7
`
`further comprising:
`
`(t)
`
`assessing a charge for each transferred response received by said central computer.
`
`(Currently Amended) A method for managing data transfers between computers
`
`including the steps of:
`
`(at)
`
`creating a questionnaire at a first site in a first computer located at a second site,
`
`said first site and said second site being connected by a network;
`
`(b)
`
`
`transmitting said questionnaire to a remote computer Via said network, said
`
`remote computer running an DIS;
`
`(c)
`
`modifying said questionnaire with incremental changes at a third site in said first
`
`computer located at said second site; and
`
`(d)
`
`transmitting said incremental changes from said first computer to said remote
`
`
`computer Via said network; and1
`
`@(el) modifying said questionnaire in said remote computer with said incremental
`
`changes.
`
`10.
`
`11.
`
`(Previously Presented) The method for managing data transfers between computers
`
`according to claim 9 wherein said first site and said third site are the same.
`
`(Previously Presented) The method for managing data transfers between computers
`
`according to claim 9 wherein said third site is at said remote computer.
`
`Petitioners — Exhibit 1007, p. 20
`
`Petitioners – Exhibit 1007, p. 20
`
`

`

`12.
`
`(New) A method for managing data comprising the steps of:
`
`(a)
`
`establishing communications between a handheld computing device and an
`
`originating computer;
`
`(b)
`
`receiving within said handheld computing device a transmission of a tokenized
`
`questionnaire from said originating computer, said tokenized questionnaire
`
`comprising a plurality of tokens;
`
`(C)
`
`ending said communications between said handheld computing device and said
`
`originating computer;
`
`(d)
`
`after said communications has been ended,
`
`(d1)
`
`executing at least a portion of said plurality of tokens comprising said
`
`questionnaire on said handheld computing device to collect at least one
`
`response from a user, and,
`
`(d2)
`
`storing within said computing device said at least one response from the
`
`user;
`
`establishing communications between said handheld computing device and a
`
`recipient computer; and,
`
`(f)
`
`transmitting a value representative of each of said at least one response stored
`
`within said handheld computing device to said recipient computer.
`
`The method for managing data according to Claim 12, wherein step (b) comprises the
`
`steps of:
`
`(b 1)
`
`creating a questionnaire,
`
`Petitioners — Exhibit 1007, p. 21
`
`Petitioners – Exhibit 1007, p. 21
`
`

`

`(b2)
`
`tokenizing said questionnaire, thereby producing a plurality of tokens
`
`representing said questionnaire,
`
`(b3)
`
`storing said plurality of tokens on a computer readable medium accessible
`
`by said originating computer,
`
`(b4)
`
`accessing said stored plurality of tokens from said originating computer,
`
`(b5)
`
`transmitting said stored plurality of tokens from said originating computer
`
`to said handheld computing device, and,
`
`(b6)
`
`receiving within said handheld computing device said transmission of said
`
`tokenized questionnaire from said originating computer
`
`14.
`
`(New) The method for managing data according to Claim 12, wherein said originating
`
`computer and said recipient computer are a same computer.
`
`15.
`
`(New) The method for managing data according to Claim 12, wherein said step (d1)
`
`comprises the steps of:
`
`(i)
`
`requiring a user to authenticate with said handheld computing
`
`device,
`
`(ii)
`
`only if the user is able to authenticate with said handheld
`
`computing device, executing at least a portion of said plurality of
`
`tokens comprising said questionnaire o