throbber
Disposition of metformin (N,N-dimethylbiguanide) in man*
`
`Kinetic parameters ol metformin (N,N-dimethylbiguanide), an anti-diabetic reported to be
`associated with a 10IVer number of episodes of lactic acidosis than phenformin, lVere determined
`in volunteers with normal renal function and in patients with different degrees ol renal
`impairment. Drug in body fluids was measured by a highly specific and sensitive mass
`fragmentographic method, alter the formation of a triazine derivative, obtained with
`heptafluorobutyric anhydride. The ha(l-life (t1h.) for the elimination ol drug from plasma after
`intravenous injection in 5 normal subjects (1.52 ± 0.3 hr) (mean ± SD) was shorter than that
`reported for phenformin by a similar assay method (7 to 15 hr). The mean tV2 in 5 renal
`patients was 4.94 ± 1.11 hr, and a correlation was observed between t'/2 ol drug from plasma
`and creatinine clearance. After oral administration of metlormin tablets, drug recovery in urines
`was only 37.6%, possibly not as a consequence of low bioavailability (a similar low recovery was
`found after oral administration of the metformin solution usedlor the intravenous studies), but of
`binding to the intestinal wall, as shown in animal and clinical studies lVith metlormin and other
`biguanides. Me(lormin is rapidly eliminated through active secretion by the kidney (mean renal
`clearance, 440.8 ml/min)-it is neither metabolized nor protein-bound in plasma. The very brief
`plasma t'/2 makes significant cumulation, with a standard tid regimen, unlikely. These findings may
`help explain the lower incidence of toxic effects, particularly lactic acidosis, than after phenformin.
`
`Cesare R. Sirtori, M.D., Ph. D., Guido Franceschini, M.S., Marzia Galli-Kienle, Ph.D.,
`Giuliana Cighetti, M.S., Gianni Galli, Ph.D., Alighiero Bondioli, M.D., and
`Franco Conti, M.D. Milan, Italy
`Center E. Grossi Paoletti, Institute ol Chemistry, School ol Medicine, Institute of Pharmacology
`and Pharmacognosy, School of Pharmacy, University of Milan, and Divisione Medica Vergani,
`Maggiore Hospital
`
`The kinetics of biguanide anti-diabetic drugs
`has received little attention, possibly because of
`the lack of adequate specific and sensitive assay
`procedures. 5 Recently developed new methods
`for the specific determination of biguanides 20 in
`
`Received for publication Feb. 2, 1978.
`Accepted for publication July 22, 1978.
`Reprint requests to: Dr. Cesare Sirtori, Center E. Grossi Paoletti,
`Via A. Del Sarto 21, 20129 Milano, Italy.
`'This study was carried out with partial support from a Re(cid:173)
`search Grant of the Consiglio N azionale delle Ricerche of
`Italy.
`
`biologic fluids have made possible more accu(cid:173)
`rate definition of kinetic parameters. By the use
`of these methods, it has been shown that sig(cid:173)
`nificant toxic effects ofbiguanides, in particular
`lactic acidosis (LA), are often correlated with
`very high plasma drug levels. 4, 9, 28
`Metformin (N,N-dimethylbiguanide) is pres(cid:173)
`ently the most widely used drug of this type
`in Western Europe.!.') Interest in the use of
`metforrnin has recently been stimulated by
`the observation of significant hypolipidemic
`effects, particularly in hypertriglyceridemic pa-
`
`0009-9236/78/120683+ 11$01.10/0 © 1978 The C. V. Mosby Co.
`
`683
`
`AUROBINDO EX. 1021, 1
`
`

`

`684 Sirtori et al.
`
`Clin. Pharmacol. Ther.
`December 1978
`
`Table I. Participating subjects with normal and altered renal excretory functions
`
`Subject
`
`Normals
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`Renal patients
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`
`M
`M
`F
`M
`M
`
`F
`M
`M
`M
`M
`
`Age (yr)
`
`Weight (kg)
`
`Creatinine
`clearance (mllmin)
`
`36
`39
`46
`60
`43
`
`40
`72
`72
`59
`29
`
`70
`64
`68
`81
`77
`
`70
`67
`53
`64
`96
`
`98
`108
`105
`92
`94
`
`48
`45
`34
`22
`20
`
`tients, 10, 23 and of changes in lipoprotein struc(cid:173)
`ture and metabolism in both experimental ani(cid:173)
`mals and in man. 24
`In spite of the very wide use of metfonnin in
`diabetes and in hyperlipidemia, a considerably
`lower incidence of LA has been reported after
`the use of this drug than after phenfonnin. I In a
`recent review of 330 cases of LA in biguanide(cid:173)
`treated diabetics, 19 12 were associated with
`metfonnin and 281 with phenfonnin. A detailed
`clinical analysis of this large patient sample
`showed that control of diabetes did not appear
`to be a significant factor in the development of
`LA, whereas impairment of kidney function
`was a frequent finding, particularly in the case
`of metfonnin, all 12 toxic patients exhibiting
`creatinine plasma levels above 3 mg/ 100 m!.
`Recent surveys in France and Switzerland com(cid:173)
`paring relative uses of biguanide drugs and
`market distribution indicated an incidence of
`LA with phenfonnin 20 and 40 times that with
`metfonnin.6, 15
`In the present report, analysis of the most
`relevant kinetic parameters of metfonnin was
`carried out in volunteers with nonnal and al(cid:173)
`tered renal excretory functions. Comparison of
`these data with findings previously reported for
`phenfonnin and bufonnin2, 17 may help explain
`differences in the incidence of LA in patients
`treated with various biguanides.
`
`Methods
`Patients. The oral and intravenous kinetic
`studies were carried out in 5 patients (4 male
`
`and I female) with nonnal blood urea nitrogen,
`plasma creatinine (PCr) , and creatinine clear(cid:173)
`ance (CrCI). All the five patients had elevated
`plasma lipid levels, 2 of them also having a
`mild chemical diabetes. The kinetic studies
`were perfonned prior to the beginning of a
`study on the effects of metformin on plasma
`lipoproteins. An intravenous test was carried
`out in 5 additional patients (4 male and 1
`female) with significantly impaired renal ex(cid:173)
`cretory function, as detennined by CrCI and
`para-aminohippurate clearances (Table I).
`Steady-state plasma levels of metformin were
`determined in patients chronically treated with
`different doses of the drug for hyperlipidemia or
`diabetes. All these patients had a nonnal renal
`function as assessed from the PCr and CrCI
`tests.
`Protocol of the pharmacokinetic studies.
`All the subjects were fasted for 12 hr before the
`oral or intravenous administration of metfor(cid:173)
`min. In the intravenous test, 1 gm of metformin
`HCI (Spemsa) was rapidly injected intraven(cid:173)
`ously and plasma samples were collected from
`an indwelling venous catheter into heparinized
`tubes. Collection of samples was at 5, 10, 30,
`60,90, 120, and 240 min, and 6,8,24,36, and
`48 hr. Urine was collected after 1, 3, and 6 hr
`and every 6 hr thereafter. Plasma samples and a
`small sample of metformin solution used for
`injection were kept frozen (- 20° C) until
`analysis.
`The oral test was carried out by administering
`a tablet of metformin (Glucophage) equivalent
`
`AUROBINDO EX. 1021, 2
`
`

`

`Volume 24
`Number 6
`
`Disposition of metformin 685
`
`to 850 mg of metformin HCI. Samples were
`collected after I, 2, 3, 4, 6,10,16,24,30,36,
`48, and 72 hr. Urine collections were at 2, 4,
`12, 24, 30, 36, 48, 54, 60, and 72 hr. The
`schedule of plasma and urine collections was
`simplified and shortened after the first two pa(cid:173)
`tients, when it became clear that the drug was
`not detectable in blood or urine after 48 hr.
`In the five patients with impaired renal func(cid:173)
`tion, only the intravenous kinetic study was
`carried out. A dose of metformin two thirds of
`that used for the normal subjects was injected
`(the correct concentration was later calculated
`by mass fragmentography). Plasma samples
`were collected after I, 2, 4, 8, 12, and 24 hr.
`The steady-state plasma samples from 55 pa(cid:173)
`tients treated with metformin for hyperlipidemia
`or diabetes were collected after an overnight
`fast. The last drug administration had taken
`place the night before; i.e., 12 to 14 hr before
`sampling. Daily drug dosage and interval be(cid:173)
`tween drug intake and blood sampling were
`recorded for each patient.
`Determination of metformin in biologic
`fluids. Concentrations of unchanged metformin
`in plasma and urinary samples were determined
`by mass fragmentography after the preparation
`of triazine derivatives essentially as described
`by Matin, Karam, and Forsham,20 with deuter(cid:173)
`ated metformin as the internal standard. Deu(cid:173)
`terated metformin was prepared by fusion of d6-
`dimethylammonium chloride with
`l-cyano(cid:173)
`guanidine as described by Werner and Bell. 26
`The obtained d6-metformin analyzed by mass
`spectrometry using
`the direct
`inlet system
`showed 98% isotopic enrichment.
`For the quantitative drug determination in
`biologic samples, an alkaline solution of d6-
`metformin (between 1 and 10 /-tg of d6-met(cid:173)
`formin based on the predicted drug concen(cid:173)
`trations) was added to the plasma or urine
`samples. After deproteinization with 10% tri(cid:173)
`chloroacetic acid in I N HCI followed by al(cid:173)
`kalinization with 10 N NaOH, samples were
`extracted with methylene chloride. 20 Heptaflu(cid:173)
`orobutyric anhydride (1 ° /-tl) was added to the
`
`extracts, and, after refluxing for I. hr, the
`methylene chloride was washed with 1 N NaOH
`followed by water. The residue, obtained after
`evaporation of the solvent, and containing the
`
`1.5
`
`0.5
`
`0.5
`
`1.0 melformin
`~ • metformin
`
`1.5
`
`Fig. 1. Standard curves showing the ratio of signal
`intensities of the metformin derivative (m/e 307) and
`of the deuterated metformin derivative (m/e 313)
`plotted against the ratio of {Lg metformin to {Lg of
`deuterated metformin.
`
`2 -amino- 4-dimethylamino- 6 -heptafluoro -s -tri(cid:173)
`azine' was dissolved in ethyl acetate and ali(cid:173)
`quots of the solution were injected for fragmen(cid:173)
`tographic analysis into a Varian 112 S spec(cid:173)
`trometer connected to a Varian SS 100 data
`system.
`Conditions of the analysis were the fol(cid:173)
`lowing:
`
`Glass column packed with I % SE 30 on 100 to
`120 mesh Gaschrom P. The oven temperature was
`160° C; injector and detector were at 250° C; the
`helium flow was 20 ml/min. The electron energy was
`set at 70 e V and other operating parameters were:
`emission current, 1.5 mA; electron multiplier, 2.5
`kV; molecular separator and ion source were at 280°
`C. For the fragmentographic analysis, the molecular
`ion (M+) at m/e 307 of the triazine, and the peak at
`m/e 313 corresponding to the molecular ion of the
`deuterated triazine, were focused.
`
`A standard curve was prepared by adding to
`ml of plasma or urine a standard amount
`of deuterated metformin HCI and increasing
`amounts of metformin HCI, and by treating
`samples as described for plasma analysis. The
`ratios of peak intensities were plotted against
`the theoretical values of /-tg metformin/ /-tg d6-
`metformin (Fig. 1). Concentrations of metfor(cid:173)
`min in the analyzed fluids were calculated from
`the standard curve.
`
`AUROBINDO EX. 1021, 3
`
`

`

`686 Sirtori et al.
`
`Clin. Pharmacal. Ther.
`December 197R
`
`Table n. Two-compartment disposition constants for metformin following intravenous
`administration in 5 normal and 5 renal patients
`
`A
`( f.Lglml)
`
`f3
`(f.Lg Iml)
`
`Normal
`
`Mean ± SEM
`
`Renal
`
`Mean ± SEM
`
`I
`2
`3
`4
`5
`
`I
`2
`3
`4
`5
`
`28.7
`900
`44.7
`960
`912
`57.2
`45.5
`912
`950
`60.1
`927 ± 12 47.2 ± 5.6
`680
`158.5
`689
`39.8
`680
`33.9
`686
`17.2
`684
`15.8
`684 ± 2
`53.0 ± 27
`
`1.59
`26.1
`1.80
`23.1
`4.80
`8.7
`2.53
`16.4
`4.04
`10.3
`2.95 ± 0.6 16.9 ± 3.4
`4.22
`9.8
`2.35
`17.7
`1.29
`32.2
`1.02
`40.8
`0.26
`160
`1.83 ± 0.7 52.1 ± 27
`
`6.31
`10.80
`9.40
`4.32
`6.99
`7.56 ± 1.15
`14.56
`17.08
`17.07
`14.84
`10.95
`14.90 ± 1.12*
`
`0.45
`0.55
`0.56
`0.35
`0.44
`0.47 ± 0.04
`0.25
`0.20
`0.10
`0.10
`0.15
`0.16 ± 0.03t
`
`Significances of the differences between values of normal and renal patients:
`*p < 0.005.
`tp < 0.001.
`:j:p < 0.02.
`§p < 0.01.
`
`Plasma concentration at zero time: C?, = A + B.
`Rate constant:
`- q. K
`0'{3. K
`-
`K
`12 =
`el - AUC.'
`21 - K-'
`eI
`
`0' + f3 + K
`el·
`
`IV
`
`Total clearance rate: Dose/ AUC i \" = Cl tot.
`
`Renal clearance rate:
`
`Drug excreted in urine
`Dose
`
`x Cltot.
`
`D
`Volume of distribution: V d{3 = -
`q
`Half life: 0.~3
`
`.
`
`Kel
`f3
`
`Areas up to time !after intravenous injections
`were calculated from the infinite area according
`to the equations:
`
`where
`
`Analysis of data. Plasma concentration-time
`curves after intravenous administration of met(cid:173)
`formin were determined after calculating the log
`regression
`lines of the
`,8-phase
`Cp = f(t)
`(elimination phase) and of the residuals of the
`a-phase (distribution phase), according to a
`two-compartment open model as suggested by
`Lintz and co-workers.17 From the curves of
`each studied subject, the hybrid constants A, a,
`B, and ,8 were computed:
`A = intercept at time zero of the first order plot of
`slope -0' obtained from the "feathered" plot of
`In C against time, where Band f3 are obtained
`and then the residuals plotted to obtain A and 0'.
`0' = apparent first order rate constant for distribution
`of the drug in the body.
`B = intercept at time zero of the first order plot of
`slope - f3 obtained from the plot of In C against
`time.
`f3 = apparent first order rate constant for elimination
`of the drug from the body.
`
`From these constants pharmacokinetic pa(cid:173)
`rameters were then determined according to the
`following equations 17:
`
`Total area under plasma concentration curve:
`
`iCpdt = ~ + ~ and ct = B e-f3t
`
`0'
`
`f3
`
`P
`
`.
`
`Bioavailability after oral administration of met(cid:173)
`formin was determined according to Equation I:
`
`F = AUCpo Div
`AUCiv Dpo '
`
`(I)
`
`AUROBINDO EX. 1021, 4
`
`

`

`Volume 24
`Number 6
`
`Disposition of metformin 687
`
`tl/2
`(hr-I)
`
`kef
`(hr-I)
`
`k21
`(hr-I)
`
`kl2
`(hr-I)
`
`Cl tot
`(mllmin)
`
`Cl ren
`(mllmin)
`
`467
`62.0
`0.29
`0.66
`255
`1.09
`1.54
`359
`39.3
`0.31
`0.79
`304
`1.26
`1.25
`56.3
`1.24
`1.17
`513
`530
`1.88
`2.30
`0.54
`286
`334
`85.8
`0.70
`1.64
`1.98
`317
`514
`70.1
`0.82
`1.58
`1.48
`2.18
`0.80 ± 0.11
`335 ± 46
`441 ± 40
`0.93 ± 0.32 62.7 ± 7.7
`1.69 ± 0.24
`1.52 ± 0.13
`118
`28.4
`0.58
`65.3
`2.08
`1.81
`2.77
`78.4
`112
`33.9
`0.84
`1.15
`0.56
`3.47
`37.4
`57.5
`34.7
`0.50
`0.63
`0.26
`6.93
`47.1
`40.7
`0.54
`69.3
`0.39
`6.93
`0.19
`85.1
`73.7
`0.01
`34.2
`0.20
`0.20
`4.62
`4.94 ± 0.86* 0.60 ± 0.3U 0.53 ± 0.10 0.85 ± 0.36 34.4 ± 1.9§ 88.4 ± 11.8t 60.4 ± 7.8t
`
`the AUC being estimated by the trapezoidal
`rule.
`All statistical and pharmacokinetic calcula(cid:173)
`tions were performed with the help of a
`Hewlett-Packard 65 calculator. Mean values
`and standard deviations were calculated accord(cid:173)
`ing to standard formulas; significance of the dif(cid:173)
`ferences was determined by Student's t test.
`Regression analysis was carried out by the
`least-squares method.
`Protein binding study. Protein binding was
`estimated in vitro by equilibrium dialysis as de(cid:173)
`scribed by Keen14 using 14C uniformly labeled
`metformin (Amersham-Searle). The radiochem(cid:173)
`ical purity of the 14C-metformin was checked by
`radio-gas chromatography of the triazine de(cid:173)
`rivative, prepared as previously described.
`More than 98% of the radioactivity was shown
`to be associated with the derivative.
`The percentage of binding was calculated
`after the serum samples, taken from 5 healthy
`laboratory co-workers and kept in dialysis tub(cid:173)
`ings (Thomas), had been in contact for 18 hr at
`4° C with a 0.15 M phosphate buffer solution
`containing the labeled metformin, at concen(cid:173)
`trations of 0.5, 0.05, and 5 fLg/ml, i.e., approx(cid:173)
`imately equivalent to steady-state plasma con(cid:173)
`centration of chronically treated patients, 1/ 10
`to 10 times this value.
`Protein concentrations18 and radioactivity
`were estimated both inside and outside the
`
`dialysis bags and albumin content of each serum
`sample was determined by electroimmunodif(cid:173)
`fusion against anti-albumin serum. 16 For radio(cid:173)
`activity determination, a I: 2 Lumasolve (Lu(cid:173)
`mac GmbH-Essen)-isopropanol solution was
`added to plasma followed by bleaching with
`H 20 2 . Samples were then added with a 9: I
`Lumagel-0.5 M HCI solution, and counted on a
`3385 Packard B Counter. Values were cor(cid:173)
`rected for efficiency and background.
`Ancillary measurements. All subjects un(cid:173)
`dergoing the oral and intravenous tests, in par(cid:173)
`ticular patients with renal excretory dysfunc(cid:173)
`tion, were carefully monitored for any changes
`in vital signs (EKG, blood pressure) during the
`experiments. In addition, plasma lactate levels
`were determined enzymatically (Boehringer(cid:173)
`Mannheim kit) in all patients undergoing the
`intravenous kinetic studies, and in patients in
`chronic treatment with metformin.
`
`Results
`Kinetic parameters in subjects with normal
`renal excretory function. After intravenous
`administration of metformin (the injected dose
`was calculated to be 926 ± 26 mg), a biexpo(cid:173)
`nential plasma decay curve was determined in
`all patients. Correlation coefficients for both the
`a and f3 phase regression lines were always
`higher than 0.7, with a good fitting (p < 0.001)
`of the observed values with the calculated lines
`
`AUROBINDO EX. 1021, 5
`
`

`

`688 Sirtori et al.
`
`c/in. Pharmacal. Ther.
`December 1978
`
`ng/ml
`
`•
`
`•
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`hrs
`
`11
`
`Fig. 2. Plasma metfonnin decay curve in a volunteer with normal renal function, following the
`intravenous injection of 1.0 gm metfonnin.
`
`for all the subjects under study. Fig. 2 shows
`the curves obtained in one normal volunteer.
`Pharmacokinetic parameters calculated for each
`subject from the A, et, B, and {3 hybrid con(cid:173)
`stants derived from the plasma curves are
`shown in Table 11. A mean value of 1.52 ± 0.3
`hr was calculated for the t11z of the unchanged
`drug (Fig. 3). A mean 86 ± 2l.9% of the ad(cid:173)
`ministered dose was recovered unchanged in
`urines. Despite the variability of elimination,
`the areas under the plasma decay curves and the
`urinary excretion at fixed time intervals for all
`subjects were found to correlate (p < 0.001).
`Plasma concentration curves after oral admin(cid:173)
`istration of metformin to the same subjects who
`received the drug by intravenous injection are
`shown in Fig. 4. Data from only four volunteers
`were available, due to the loss of several sam(cid:173)
`ples from the fifth subject (pattern of the plasma
`curve, estimated from the available samples,
`however, was not different from that of the
`others). Urinary excretion after oral adminis-
`
`tration of the tablets was 37.6 ± 10.6% of
`the dose after 48 hr. This recovery differs
`(p < 0.02) from that observed after intravenous
`administration to the same SUbjects. Bioavaila(cid:173)
`bility, as expressed by the ratio between the
`AUC's, was 0.32.
`To evaluate the hypothesis of a low bioavail(cid:173)
`ability of the metformin tablets, the solution
`used for the intravenous experiments, as sug(cid:173)
`gested by Huffman, Manion, and Azarnoff,12
`was given to 4 normal male subjects. One gram
`of the metformin Hel solution (the exact con(cid:173)
`centration was later controlled by mass frag(cid:173)
`mentography) was administered, and urines
`were collected for the following 48 hr. The uri(cid:173)
`nary recovery of metformin in these subjects
`was 29.7 ± 10.3%, which does not differ from
`that after oral administration of tablets.
`Kinetic parameters in patients with altered
`renal excretory function. The results after in(cid:173)
`travenous injection of metformin to patients
`with impaired renal function are reported in
`
`AUROBINDO EX. 1021, 6
`
`

`

`Volume 24
`Number 6
`
`Disposition of metformin 689
`
`IO~
`
`ng/ml
`
`ra • 0.94
`
`r~ • 0.97
`
`7
`:3
`2
`4
`5
`6
`Fig. 3. Plasma metformin decay curve in 5 volunteers with normal renal function; X ± SD.
`Regression lines of the ex and {3 phase were fitted by the least-squares method from the mean values
`at each time interval.
`
`Table 11 and Fig. 5. The mean plasma tV2 for
`these patients was 4.94 ± 1.11 hr, i.e., longer
`(p < 0.005) than that of normal volunteers.
`Analysis of the different disposition constants
`(Table II) shows reduced ,B -coefficient, with
`decreased rate of elimination (Kel)' total and
`renal clearance (Cltot and Clren), and volume of
`distribution (V d)/l' There was significant corre(cid:173)
`lation between the plasma tV2 of metformin and
`the CrCl in the normal and nephropathic pa(cid:173)
`tients (Fig. 6). The extrapolated tV2 at CrCl = 0
`was found to be 7 hr; it was 10.9 hr when calcu(cid:173)
`lated from the extrarenal elimination in normal
`subjects.
`Relationship between dose, plasma levels,
`and plasma lactic acid. Plasma levels after
`chronic treatment were available for 55 pa(cid:173)
`tients. All of these had plasma creatinine levels
`below 1.2 mg/ 100 ml and a CrCl within normal
`limits. The range of steady-state plasma levels
`was between 60 and 2,240 ng/ml. Means ±
`
`SEM for different dose levels were as follows:
`
`500 mg/day (n = 6): 161.7 ± 91 ng/ml;
`1,000 mg/day (n = 4): 384 ± 62.4 ng/ml;
`1,700 mg/day (n = 13): 382.3 ± 76.9 ng/ml;
`2,550 mg/day (n = 12): 1,038 ± 192.4 ng
`
`There was a correlation between doses adminis(cid:173)
`tered and the steady-state plasma levels (r =
`0.50; P < 0.001). Plasma lactate levels were
`determined in 43 patients concomitantly with
`the drug level. Only in two was the lactate level
`above 2 mM/I; both of these had a low-normal
`drug level (160 and 570 ng/ml). There was no
`correlation between plasma lactic acid and drug
`levels (r = 0.21, P < 0.1). Lactic acid levels
`were also determined during the intravenous
`kinetic studies. In none of these were there
`significant elevations of lactacidemia.
`Protein binding. Protein binding in serum
`samples from 5 healthy volunteers (albumin
`
`AUROBINDO EX. 1021, 7
`
`

`

`690 Sirtori et al.
`
`Clin. Pharmacal. Ther.
`December 1978
`
`10'
`
`ngAnI
`
`10'
`
`ra =0.94
`rf3 = 1.00
`
`I~L-~-r--.-------.--------'-------'~
`hrs
`40
`10
`20
`4 6
`30
`
`Fig. 4. Plasma levels of metformin in 4 normal volunteers following administration of one 850-mg
`tablet.
`
`10
`
`5
`
`• •
`
`r = 0.88
`
`10
`
`20
`
`hrs
`
`Fig. 5. Plasma metformin decay curve in patients
`with impaired renal excretory functions. Regression
`lines were fitted as in Fig. 3.
`
`Fig. 6. Correlation between half-lives of the ,a-phase
`of the metformin plasma decay curves and the
`creatinine clearance (CrCI) of subjects with normal
`and impaired renal excretory functions.
`
`50
`
`100 ...!!!L CrCI
`min
`
`150
`
`concentrations ranging between 3.23 and 4.77
`gm/lOO ml) was found to be practically negli(cid:173)
`gible. As shown in Table Ill, labeled metformin
`at all three concentrations was perfectly equili(cid:173)
`brated in the dialysis system.
`
`Discussion
`
`Our study reports on kinetic parameters of
`metformin in subjects with normal and altered
`renal excretory functions. A highly specific and
`sensitive fragmentographic method was de(cid:173)
`veloped for
`the determination of drug
`in
`plasma. The use of this method was necessary
`because preliminary tests described by other au(cid:173)
`thors20 for gas-liquid chromatography did not
`provide reproducible results in our hands. By
`
`using a biguanide analog, buformin, as the in(cid:173)
`ternal standard, we noted excessive variability
`in the relative recoveries after extraction of the
`biguanides from basic solutions with methylene
`chloride, as well as in the formation of the
`chlorodifiuoroacetic anhydride derivative.
`Mass fragmentography has the advantage of
`distinguishing between the compound to be
`tested and a deuterated standard, with identical
`physicochemical properties. The measurement
`of metformin levels in plasma and urines is thus
`independent of loss of material during sample
`preparation. This method indicates excellent
`correlation of the experimental values with the
`line calculated by regression analysis (Fig. 1)
`and allows the measurement of metformin con-
`
`AUROBINDO EX. 1021, 8
`
`

`

`Volume 24
`Number 6
`
`Disposition of metformin 691
`
`Table Ill. Results of equilibrium dialysis of 14C-metformin between normal plasma and buffer
`
`Metformin in buffer
`before dialysis (ng Iml)
`
`50
`500
`5,000
`*x :!: so of 5 subjects.
`
`Proteins (mglml)
`
`Metformin (nglml)*
`
`I
`
`Plasma
`
`79.8 ± 5.1
`84.2 ± 6.4
`8l.8 ± 5.6
`
`Buffer
`
`Plasma
`
`l.7 ± l.6
`l.5 ± 1.4
`1.5 ± l.5
`
`29.5 ± 1.5
`282.8 ± 7.3
`293.5 ± 1.37
`
`I
`
`Buffer
`
`30.0 ± l.6
`292.4 ± 4.3
`305.4 ± 4.9
`
`centrations in biologic samples up to nanogram
`levels.
`After intravenous injection to healthy sub(cid:173)
`jects, metformin was shown to be rapidly
`cleared from plasma, with a t1f2 (1.52 hr)
`significantly lower than that reported for phen(cid:173)
`formin (from 7 to 15 hr) and for buformin (4 to
`6 hr). 2, 8, 11, 17 The almost complete urinary
`recovery of unchanged drug after intravenous
`injection indicates that met form in is not me(cid:173)
`tabolized by man21 and that as buformin it is
`significantly secreted by the renal tubule. 17
`A comparison of the disposition constants for
`metformin after intravenous administration to
`normals and renal patients, as reported in Table
`11, shows that the tYz of the f3-phase differs
`significantly between the two groups. Similar
`differences were observed in the rate of elimi(cid:173)
`nation and in the total and renal clearances.
`Renal patients also have significant reduction in
`the apparent volume of distribution. The mark(cid:173)
`edly reduced V d/3, found in renal patients for
`other drugs with a short plasma t1f2 and predom(cid:173)
`inant renal excretion, has been attributed to a
`different plasma/tissue distribution of drugs in
`our patients. 9
`In normals and in renal patients, the t1fz of
`the unchanged drug correlated with creatinine
`clearance, thus indicating the possibility of
`cumulation in severe kidney impairment. This
`would, however, be far less likely than with
`phenformin or buformin.
`Metformin is most often administered three
`times daily (i.e., at approximately 8-hr inter(cid:173)
`vals), and cumulation of unchanged drug after
`chronic treatment
`
`( Fcum =
`
`1
`1-2-<
`
`, where E = r*)
`t1f2
`
`*Interval of drug administration in hours.
`
`will be approximately 20% higher in a patient
`with a t1Iz of 3 hr (i.e., with a creatinine clear(cid:173)
`ance between 30 and 60 ml) than in one with a
`normal t1f2 of 1.5 hr. Doubling of cumulation
`would occur only with tllz above 7 hr, i.e., in
`patients with CrCl of 30 ml/min or less.
`In patients with normal renal function chron(cid:173)
`ically treated with metformin, there was sig(cid:173)
`nificant correlation between the doses adminis(cid:173)
`tered and the steady-state plasma levels. No
`correlation was found in these same subjects
`between the steady-state plasma drug levels and
`PCr or CrCl. In chronically treated patients with
`no evidence of LA, plasma metformin levels
`contrast strikingly to plasma levels of 500 to
`800 ng/ml in acidotic patients treated with
`phenformin or buformin. 8, 13, 28 This difference
`is, however, to be ascribed to the higher daily
`doses of metformin used in therapy (recom(cid:173)
`mended daily doses for phenformin or buformin
`are respectively 50 to 100 mg and 250 to 350
`mg). The relatively low toxicity of met form in in
`association with high plasma levels may pos(cid:173)
`sibly depend on the lower affinity of metformin
`for mitochondrial membranes, recently shown
`by Schiifer22 to be part of the mechanism of
`action of biguanides, as well as a likely expla(cid:173)
`nation for the increased plasma lactic acid levels
`induced by this type of drugs.
`Reliable data are unfortunately not available
`for plasma metformin levels in patients with
`LA. A recent report by Assan and co-workers4
`on several cases of this syndrome in metfor(cid:173)
`min-treated diabetics indicates drug levels 10-
`to lOO-fold those found by us. Conlay and co(cid:173)
`workers8 also noted a discrepancy between their
`findings and those of Assan and co-workers 4
`on phenformin plasma levels in patients with
`LA.3 These discrepancies are probably depen(cid:173)
`dent on the colorimetric method for guanidine
`
`AUROBINDO EX. 1021, 9
`
`

`

`692 Sirtori et al.
`
`Clin. Pharmacal. Ther.
`December 1978
`
`compounds used by Assan and co-workers,3, 4
`not adequately specific for measuring very low
`drug levels in plasma. Monitoring of plasma
`lactic acid levels never brought out significant
`elevations during our kinetic studies. Only
`in two chronically treated subjects was lac(cid:173)
`tacidemia slightly above normal; both of these
`subjects had plasma metformin levels in the low
`range.
`In the study by Conlay and co-workers 8 on
`phenformin, it was noted that plasma levels of
`unchanged drug in toxic patients do not appear
`to bear a significant correlation with
`lac(cid:173)
`tacidemia. This can be due to the fact that a
`considerable interval had elapsed between diag(cid:173)
`nosis of LA and sampling of plasma drug levels
`and, perhaps more important, to the presence of
`phenfonnin metabolites. Thirty percent of a
`dose of phenformin is present in plasma as a
`hydroxylated derivative,I:3 for which no analyt(cid:173)
`ical methods are presently available. In con(cid:173)
`trast, metfonnin is apparently not metabolized
`and the only excretory means is the kidney.
`Thus, measuring metformin in plasma may be a
`more useful parameter for predicting toxicity.
`Moreover, metformin, unlike phenformin, is
`not plasma protein bound; this factor would thus
`become unimportant in uremic patients, who
`may have a lower plasma protein binding
`affinity for drugs. 7
`After oral administration, urinary recovery of
`metfonnin was very low both when the drug
`was given in tablet fonn and when metfonnin
`was given as the solution used in the intrave(cid:173)
`nous study (which provides maximal bioavail(cid:173)
`ability). 12 If a poor bioavailability of metformin
`tablets is excluded, there must be other expla(cid:173)
`nations for the poor absorption. Although the
`metabolism of metfonnin was not the object of
`this study, parallel animal investigations, in
`mice and rabbits, published elsewhere,25 were
`carried out with 14C-metfoimin to examine the
`distribution of the drug and the possible pres(cid:173)
`ence of metabolites. In both animal species,
`after oral and intravenous administration, sig(cid:173)
`nificant binding of drug to the intestinal wall
`was detected. Liver/intestine ratios (per mg of
`protein) of 1. 44 and 1. 51 were found in rabbits
`6 and 4 hr after the oral and intravenous admin(cid:173)
`istrations of labeled metformin; in mice, the
`
`liver/intestine ratios, 2 hr after the oral and in(cid:173)
`travenous administrations, were 0.29 and 0.34.
`Kinetic parameters, as determined in the rabbits
`after
`intravenous administration,
`resembled
`those in man, with a tY2 of the plasma ,a-phase
`of 1.47 hr. The search for specific drug metab(cid:173)
`olites in rabbits after oral administration of 14C_
`metforrnin gave negative results: levels of un(cid:173)
`changed drug, as determined by the fragmen(cid:173)
`tographic technique, were essentially identical
`to levels calculated from plasma radioactivity at
`different time intervals after drug administra(cid:173)
`tion. The hypothesis that the intestine is a major
`site of action for metformin is supported by
`similar findings with buformin 17 and by the re(cid:173)
`sults of several experimental studies on the ef(cid:173)
`fects of biguanides on intestinal absorptive
`mechanisms. 27
`In conclusion, kinetic studies on metfonnin
`demonstrate rapid excretion of unchanged drug
`with no protein binding. Excretion is slower in
`nephropathic patients, but only with extremely
`impaired renal excretory function is significant
`cumulation likely to occur. These results con(cid:173)
`finn the clinical observation that only in some
`patients with a very severe kidney impainnent,4
`metformin may be retained for a long enough
`period of time to induce LA. This may explain
`the lower incidence of LA reported with met(cid:173)
`formin than with other biguanides.
`
`We thank Or. Daniel Azarnoff for his generous
`help in reviewing this manuscript, Drs. GiancarIo
`Nesi and Enzo Cocuzza (Spemsa-Aron, Florence) for
`kindly providing the different pharmaceutical prep(cid:173)
`arations of metformin and for constant advice and
`support of this study, Drs. Co hen and A vramoussis
`(Aron, Paris, France) for supplying the intermediates
`for the synthesis of deuterated metformin and for
`generous support throughout the study, Or. Vittore
`Tamassia (Milan) who kindly revised the protocols
`and the results and allowed ample time for helpful
`discussion, and Or. M. Fattorini (Centro Anti(cid:173)
`diabetico, Lodi) for collecting samples fr

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket