throbber
Newsdesk
`
`Supercomputer-designed drug protects against chemotherapy
`toxicity
`BNP7787, a drug designed by Cray
`supercomputer technology to protect
`patients from the neurotoxic effects of
`chemotherapy, has just reached phase
`III clinical trials. “Preclinical work in
`rats has already demonstrated that
`BNP7787 can prevent toxicity induced
`by common chemotherapy treatments
`such as taxanes and cisplatin, while
`
`and the USA. LD50 data show that
`BNP7787 has
`toxicity
`similar
`to
`substances such as aspirin and table salt.
`“In addition, BNP7787 does not appear
`to affect the ability of Taxol or other
`chemotherapeutic agents
`to cause
`tumour apoptosis”, says Hausheer.
`Epie Boven and Herbert Pinedo
`(Vrije Universiteit Medical Centre,
`Amsterdam, Netherlands), who have
`carried out a dose-finding study with
`BNP7787, confirm that the compound
`is tolerated well and that it shows
`promising efficacy. “BNP7787 has the
`potential to act as a protective agent
`against dose-cumulative neurotoxicity
`from Taxol and cisplatin, without
`interfering with the chemotherapeutic
`activity”, says Boven. The use of
`supercomputer engineering to design of
`compounds by selecting favourable
`pharmacological characteristics that act
`against specific targets is, she adds,
`“extremely elegant”. Both Boven and
`Pinedo welcome the novel design
`approach being pioneered by Hausheer.
`“The use of supercomputer technology
`in drug development should lead to the
`discovery of many lead compounds in
`the near future”, predicts Boven.
`Kathryn Senior
`
`pretreatment infusion of BNP7787 at a
`dose of 18.4 g/m2; the other group will
`receive a control infusion. “We know
`from animal studies that the timing of
`the BNP7787 infusion is important,
`and so it will be given immediately
`after the hour-long Taxol treatment”,
`explains
`Kathy
`Hurtado
`of
`BioNumerik. Results are expected in
`summer 2001. BNP7787
`was
`given
`fast-track
`designation by the US
`Food and Drug Admin-
`istration in July, 1999; if
`the results of phase III
`trials
`are
`good,
`the
`product
`could
`receive
`approval only 6 months
`after study completion.
`BNP7787 is a water-
`(disodium-2,2⬘-
`soluble disulphide
`dithio-bis-ethane sulph-onate), which
`selectively
`inactivates
`the
`toxic
`monohydrated
`form
`of
`Taxol.
`“Approximately half of patients who are
`given weekly Taxol
`suffer nerve
`damage”,
`points
`out Hausheer;
`currently, there is no way to prevent or
`treat this damage. BNP7787 has shown
`an excellent safety profile in phase I
`studies at doses of 41 g/m2 in Europe
`
`Courtesy of BioNumerik
`
`Computer-generated 3-dimensional structure of
`BNP7787
`
`causing no side-effects,” says Frederick
`H Hausheer (BioNumerik Pharma-
`ceuticals, San Antonio, TX, USA).
`During the next
`few months,
`between 170 and 240 patients with
`metastatic breast cancer will be
`recruited. The trial will run for 24
`weeks and will monitor aggregate
`neurotoxicity in two groups of women
`receiving weekly doses of Taxol
`(paclitaxel); one group will be given a
`
`CCI-779: a new targeted anticancer agent
`
`A novel anticancer drug, CCI-779, has
`shown promise in a series of phase I
`studies, the results of which were
`presented at the European Society of
`Medical
`Oncology
`conference
`(Hamburg, Germany; Oct 13 – 17).
`The rationale for developing this
`anticancer agent came from studies
`into the mechanism of action of
`a well-known
`immunosuppressive
`agent, rapamycin. This drug was found
`to target a key component of a novel
`signalling pathway, called mTOR
`protein kinase. Preclinical research
`showed that CCI-779, a derivative of
`rapamycin, binds mTOR and inhibits
`the downstream pathway effects,
`leading to cell growth arrest in the G1
`phase of the cell cycle. The mTOR
`pathway can be hyperactivated by
`mutation or deletion of the PTEN
`tumour suppressor gene, which is
`found in many tumour types.
`
`198
`
`In a phase I dose-escalation study
`in France, 21 patients with advanced
`solid
`tumours were
`treated with
`7.5 – 220 mg/m2 CCI-779, given intra-
`venously once a week for 6 months.
`The maximum tolerated dose has not
`yet been reached, and toxic effects were
`mild. Eric Raymond (Institut Gustav-
`Roussy, Villejuif, France) reported
`that, of the 16 patients evaluable for
`response, three with renal-cell carc-
`inoma had a partial (one) or minor
`response (two), which was maintained
`for 7 months. There were two other
`partial
`responses
`(neuroendocrine
`tumour and breast cancer) and one
`stable disease (soft-tissue sarcoma).
`Manuel Hidalgo (University of
`Texas Health Science Center at San
`Antonio, TX, USA) reported the results
`of a US phase I study in 51 patients with
`advanced solid tumours. One partial
`response was observed in non-small-
`
`cell lung cancer, and minor responses
`or prolonged stable disease were seen in
`renal-cell carcinoma (three), cervical
`cancer (one), uterine cancer (one) and
`soft-tissue sarcoma (three).
`Two
`randomised multicentre
`phase II trials are underway, one in
`renal-cell carcinoma in the USA and
`the second, in breast cancer, is ongoing
`in Europe. “It also makes sense to
`investigate the use of CCI-779 in
`prostate cancer and in glioblastoma, as
`these tumours have high rates of PTEN
`mutations, and phase II trials in these
`tumours are being discussed”, says
`Raymond. “CCI-779 is a very specific,
`targeted agent. It is therefore crucial to
`analyse the data collected so far so that
`we can optimise the doses for tumour
`response, find out which tumours will
`benefit most, and use tumour profiles
`to identify the most suitable patients.”
`Ezzie Hutchinson
`
`THE LANCET Oncology Vol 1 December 2000
`
`West-Ward Exhibit 1081
`Hutchinson 2000
`Page 001
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket