throbber
AHHALS OF OHCOLOGY - EHGLISH EDITION
`
`o 2000 VOLUME 11 ISSUE 4 SUPPLEMEHT
`
`El lfillijJlllW,ll~~l~Ulll
`
`- ~0006682
`03
`C)(/)
`
`SMO
`
`Volume 11, 2000
`Supplement 4
`
`CODEN ANONE2
`ISSN 0923-7534
`
`*
`***
`* *
`* **
`*** * *
`LIBRA~:t f
`
`Hamburg. Germany. 13-17 October 2000
`
`Guest Editors: Scientific Comm ittee of the 25th ESMO Congress
`
`Introduction
`25th ESMO Congress - Organisation
`ESMO Committees
`Acknowledgements
`Industrial Satellite Symposia
`Exhibitors
`
`Hamilton Fairley Award for Clinical Research
`Presidential Symposium
`ESMO Special Symposium:
`Cancer vaccination
`ESMO Special Symposium:
`Combined modality: Its present status
`ESMO Special Symposium:
`Design and analysis of clinical trials
`ESMO Special Symposium:
`Haematology: Hot spots
`ESMO Special Symposium:
`I lcrcditary preui~pu!>itiu11
`ESMO Special Symposium:
`Novel targets for cancer therapy
`ESMO/ASCO Joint Symposium :
`Chemoprevention and screening of prostate and
`breast cancers
`Angiogenesis
`Basic science and bench to bed~ide (lab)
`
`v
`VI
`vii
`ix
`XIV
`xiv
`
`3
`4
`
`5
`
`5
`
`6
`
`6
`
`7
`
`7
`
`9
`I 0
`11
`
`Breast cancer. earl y
`Breast cancer (early and advanced)
`Breast cancer, advanced
`Cancer vaccination
`Colorectal cancer
`Colorec tal cancer and other gastrointesti nal tumours
`Upper gastro intestinal tumours
`Elderly patients
`Genito-urinary tumours
`Gynaecological ca ncer
`Head and neck cancer
`Leukaemia and myeloma
`Lymphoma
`Lung cancer
`Biological factors in lung cancer
`Melanoma and sarcoma
`euro-oncology
`ovel therapeutics and phamiacology. biological
`approaches
`Palliative and supportive care
`Oncology Highlights 2000
`
`Index of Authors
`Index of Subjects
`
`ESMO Application for Membership
`
`16
`22
`25
`41
`43
`59
`62
`72
`73
`81
`90
`95
`98
`107
`124
`125
`131
`
`132
`145
`155
`
`157
`175
`
`195
`
`111
`
`11
`
`1111
`
`0923-7534(2000)11 +4;1 -0
`
`Kluwer Academic Publishers
`
`West-Ward Exhibit 1080
`Hidalgo ESMO 2000 - Page 001
`
`

`

`Novel therapeutics and pharmacology, biological approaches
`
`We are now conducting a phase I tnal of adenov1rally delivered nitroreductase
`and IV CB1954 in patients with primary/secondary liver tumours.
`
`I 608PD I Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of BIBX 1382, an
`
`EGFR inhibitor, as continuous daily oral
`administration.
`Christian Dittrich 1 , Uta Bruntsch 2 , Markus Bomer 3 , Karin Weigang 2 ,
`Holger Huisman•, Andree Amelsberg 5 , Jant1en Wanders 4 , Axel Hanauske 6 ,
`Pierre Fumoleau 7 . 1 LBl-ACR VIE, KFJ-Sp1tal, Vienna, Austna; 2 5th Medical
`Clime, Nurnberg, Germany, 3 Dept. Oncology, lnselsp1tal, Bern, Switzerland;
`4 NDDO-Oncology, Amsterdam, Netherlands; 5 Boehringer Jngelheim,
`Biberach, Germany; 6 Techmcal University, Munich, Germany; 7 Centre Rene
`Gauducheau, Nantes, France, For the EORTC-Early Clinical Studies Group
`(ECSG)
`
`The pyrim1do-pynmidine BIBX 1382 inhibits the intracellular tyrosine kinase
`domaine of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), thus specifically
`reverting the aberrant enzymatic act1v1ty from overexpressed and constitutively
`activated EGFR, respectively. A mod1f1ed Fibonacci scheme was used to
`escalate the daily oral dose; the following dosages and cycles (defined as
`treatment during 28 days) were applied, respectively 25mg 6, 50mg: 2;
`100mg 5; 200mg: 7, 150mg: 3 Over a 10 months accrual phase, 11 pts
`(7 females, 4 males) with a median age of 63 years (50-73), WHO PS 0:5,
`1 6 and miscellaneous solid tumors were entered The number of cycles
`applied per pt was median 1 5 (0-7) Reversible, dose-dependent increase
`of liver enzymes (maximal CTC grades: GGT: 4, SGOT: 3, SGPT: 3, aP: 3,
`bilirubin: 3) prevented regularly from further dose escalation. Oral med1cat1on
`yielded plasma levels far below expected to be efficacious. Realistically, target
`plasma levels could not be reached via the oral route at reasonable dosage
`Meanwhile, a preclinically unknown metabolite was 1dentif1ed from unne of one
`patient. Subsequently, this metabolite was found to be abundant in patient
`plasma The metabolite was demonstrated to be pharmacologically inactive.
`Due to dose limiting increase of liver enzymes, low bioava1fability of BIBX
`1382 and detection of a pharmacologically inactive metabolite this tnal was
`discontinued
`
`I 609PD I A phase I and pharmacologic trial of weekly
`
`epothilone B in patients with advanced
`malignancies.
`, Malcolm Moore 1
`Amit Oza 1, RM Zamek 3 , Lillian Siu 1 , SM Locsin 3
`,
`F. Chen 2 , T -L. Chen 2 , Patricia Cohen 2 , John Rothermel 2 , Eric Rubm 3 •
`1 Medical Oncology and Hematology, Pnncess Margaret Hospital, Toronto,
`Canada; 2 Novartis, New Jersey, USA, 3 RWJ-UMDNJ, The Cancer lnsfltute of
`New Jersey, New Brunswick, USA
`
`Epothilone B (EB) is a naturally occurring macrollde that 1s a more potent
`microtubule stabilizer than paclitaxel and exh1b1ts a broad range of preclinical
`anti-tumor activity at pg/ml levels. EB is also active in paclitaxel-res1stant
`models. A phase I dose-escalating trial of weekly intravenous administration
`of EB was undertaken to determine tox1c1ties, to identify a maximum-tolerated
`dose, and to assess pharmacokinet1cs Patients receive weekly infusions of
`EB every 6 out of 9 weeks and are enrolled in cohorts of 3 or more using
`a Fibonacci-based dose escalation strategy. 24 patients have been enrolled
`to date at doses ranging from 0.3mg/m2 to 1.85mg/m2 . Only one patient has
`developed grade 3 toxicity with parasthes1a to date at dose level 2 (0 5mglm2 )
`Pharmacok1net1c results are presented.
`
`Dose
`mglm2
`03
`03
`0.5
`0.5
`0.75
`075
`11
`11
`
`Week
`
`1
`6
`1
`6
`1
`6
`1
`6
`
`AUC1NF
`ng h/ml
`28
`187
`85
`312
`189
`153
`204
`NA
`
`Cmax
`mg/ml
`15
`14
`14
`28
`18
`19
`23
`NA
`
`CL
`mg/min
`462
`
`254
`
`189
`
`185
`
`Vss
`L
`1201
`
`1179
`
`820
`
`843
`
`T112
`H
`64
`73
`83
`103
`58
`63
`59
`NA
`
`At the initial dose level, drug accumulation was observed with an accumu-
`lation ratio (AUCo-SOh dose 6/AUCo-soh - · 1) of 2.45. Continued dose escalation
`is planned.
`
`protease inhibitor. Trastuzumab (Herceptin '" ), a humanized antibody against
`HER2 ectodomain, at doses of 10-100 nM, also inhibited basal and induced
`HER2 cleavage. This inhibitory effect is specific of trastuzumab, since 2C4,
`another antibody against HER2 ECO, did not show any significant effect on
`constitutive receptor shedding. The inhibition of HER2 cleavage is not due to
`antibody-induced receptor downmodulat1on, given that trastuzumab inhibited
`HER2 cleavage at 30 mm, and receptor downmodulation was not detected until
`24 h In addition, trastuzumab effectively prevented HER2 shedding in cells
`where receptor internalization was inhibited by hypertonic treatment Finally,
`an increase in the phosphotyrosine content of full-length HER2 was associ(cid:173)
`ated with APMA-induced cleavage m BT-474 cells, and this increase was less
`pronounced if trastuzumab was present. These data indicate that trastuzumab
`has a direct inhibitory effect on HER2 shedding that could contribute to its
`therapeutic properties.
`
`I 6060 I A phase I and pharmacological study of CCl-779, a
`rapamycin ester cell cycle inhibitor.
`Manuel Hidalgo 1·2 , Enc Rowinsky 1·2 , Charles Erlichman 3 ,
`2
`Ronald Drengler 1·
`, Bonnie Marshall 4 , Randy Marks 3 , Tam Edwards 1·2 ,
`Joseph Boni 4 , Gary Dukart•, Jan Buckner 3 1 University of Texas Health
`Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA; 2 Institute for Drug
`Development, San Antonio, TX, USA, 3 Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA;
`4 Wyeth-Ayerts Research, Radnor. PA, USA
`
`CCl-779 is an ester of rapamycm which 1nhib1ts the cell cycle. The agent
`inh1b1ts the activity of mTOR (mammalian target of rapamycin) and disrupts
`key signal transduction pathways, including those regulated by the p70s6
`and PHAS-1 kinases resulting in cell cycle arrest at the G1-S boundary This
`study is evaluating the feasibility, pharmacok1netics and biological effects of
`escalating doses of CCl-779 administered as a 30-minute IV infusion daily
`x 5 every 2 weeks to patients (pis) with solid neoplasms Fifty-one pts
`have received 262 courses (median 4, range 1-16) at doses ranging from
`O 75-19.1 mg/m2/d. Three episodes of DLT have been observed in the 1st
`cycle so far consisting of asymptomatic, grade 3 hypocalcem1a at the 2. 1 6
`mg/m2/d dose level (1 pt), grade 3 elevation in transaminases (1 pt), and
`grade 3 vomiting, grade 2 diarrhea and grade 2 asthenia (1 pt) at the 19.1
`mg/m2/d Grade 3 thrombocytopenia requmng dose reduction was observed
`in 3 heavily-pretreated (HP) pis at the 19.1 mg/m2/d dose level, indicating that
`this dose 1s not well-tolerated in HP subjects At this juncture, HP patients
`are rece1v1ng 15 mg/m2 , while doses continue to be escalated in m1nimally(cid:173)
`pretreated pts. Other tox1cit1es noted, generally mild-moderate, some over a
`broad dose range, include neutropenia, rash, mucos1t1s, asthenia, lever, and
`hypertriglycendem1a. Allergic phenomena have also being observed. In 1 7
`pis receiving doses of 0.75-3 12 mg/m2 /d, CCl-779 exh1b1ted increasing peak
`concentrations with increasing dose, preferential red blood cell part1t1oning, and
`a median terminal hall-life of 15.2 h One patient with NSCLC achieved a PR
`Minor antitumor responses and/or prolonged(> 4 monlhs) stable disease have
`been noted in several drug-refractory cancers including: soft-tissue sarcoma
`(3), and cervical (1), uterine (1), and renal cell (3) carcinomas. CCl-779 dose
`escalation-expansion continues. The toxicity profile and antitumor activity
`observed to date are encouraging.
`
`I 6070 I Phase I study of the gene therapy prodrug, CB1954.
`
`Guy Chung-Faye, Joanna Clark, Rachael Barton, Joanna Baddeley,
`David Anderson, Leonard Seymour, David Ferry, David Kerr Institute of
`Cancer Studies, Blfmmgham, United Kingdom
`
`CB1954 (5-(aziridin-1-yl)-2,4-dinitrobenzamide), a substrate for the bacterial
`enzyme nitroreductase, is converted into a potent bifunct1onal alkylating agent.
`CB1954 1s a candidate prodrug in virus-directed, enzyme prodrug therapy
`(VDEPT) protocols. CB1954 was administered by bolus intravenous (IV)
`injection on a 3-weekly cycle, or intraperitoneally (IP) followed by 3-weekly IV
`injections, with a maximum of six cycles of drug. 30 patients were treated,
`age range (23-78 years, median 62 years). 19 patients were males. 22
`patients received IV CB1954, 8 patients had IP CB1954, 4 of whom also
`received IV drug. 13 cases were colorectal cancers, 4 gastric, 3 oesophageal,
`3 mesotheliomas, with ovarian, pancreatic and unknown primaries accounting
`for the remainder The first dose level was 3mg/m2, no significant tox1c1ty
`was seen until the fifth dose level of 24mg/m2. The maximum tolerated dose
`IV was 37.5mg/m2 with gastro-intestinal and hepatic dose-limiting toxicities
`(DLn. No DLT has been seen in the IP regime at the current dose of 24mg/m2.
`No alopecia, marrow suppression or nephrotoxic1ty was observed No clinical
`response was seen. CB1954 pharmacokinetics indicated a linear relationship
`between dose and area under the curve for the IV dose range of 3-24mg/m2 ,
`with a non-linear effect at higher doses. Mean elimination hall-life was 1 7
`minutes with <5% renal excretion. Animal data suggests biliary excretion
`as the main clearance mechanism. Serum levels after IV administration
`(30mg/m2), persisted between 10 and 1µM for 2 hours. IP administration
`(24mg/m2) achieved peritoneal levels between 100 and 1µM for 18 hours
`The IC50 for CB1954 in cancer cells expressing nitroreductase ranges from
`0.1and10 µM. In summary, CB19541s a well-tolerated prodrug and sufficient
`serum/peritoneal levels are generated for a VDEPT approach to be feasible.
`
`Annals of Oncology, Supplemenl 4 10 Volume 11, 2000
`
`© 2000 Kluwer Academic Publishers, Primed in The Ncihcrlands
`
`133
`
`West-Ward Exhibit 1080
`Hidalgo ESMO 2000 - Page 002
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket