throbber
\K
`
`2m!
`
`‘ Annual Meeting «
`
`
`
`_Aflc AmericanAssociatibh‘forCancerResearCh
`
` Proceedings
`
`March 24—28, 2001 - New Orleans: LA
`
`
`
`Valume 42 - March 2001
`
`West-Ward Exhibit 1077
`
`Beuvink 2001 - Page 001
`
`West-Ward Exhibit 1077
`Beuvink 2001 - Page 001
`
`

`

`EXPERIMENTAL/MOLECULAR THERAPEUTICS 19
`
`therapy Is more rational than sequential therapy. Finally, the combination of PB +
`CRA and TX was evaluated in vivo. PC3 tumor growth was significantly delayed
`In animals treated with either TX or concomitantly with TX and PB + CRA, as
`compared to control. However, animals treated with all three agents demon(cid:173)
`strated further growth delay than the TX alone arm (P< 0.012). These results
`suggest a rational therapeutic approach for combination of these agents given
`concomitantly, but not sequentially.
`
`#1969 The Up-Regulation of GADD153 Expression In Human l:plthellal
`Tumor Cells Treated with N-(4-Hydroxyphenyl)Retlnamlde (4HPR). Yuhe Xia,
`Nai-Sum Wong, Wang-Fun Fong, and Henk Tldeman. City University of Hong
`Kong, Hong Kong, China, and The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
`Previous clinical trial studies have demonstrated a favorable therapeutic Index for
`the semi-synthetic retlnoid N-(4-hydroxyphenyOretinamlde (4HPR, fenretlnide), but
`the underlying molecular mechanism of actions for this drug is largely unknown. This
`Issue Is addressed with the use of the CNE3 human epitheOai tumor cell line estab(cid:173)
`lished from a poorly dlfferentlated nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Treatment of these
`cells with 4HPR (2.5-40 µM) inltlalJy resulted in dose-dependent cell-cycle arrest, \\/ith
`cells accumulating In the Gof'G1 phase, and a corresponding reduction In the G;!M
`phase. Continued application of 4HPR resulted in apoptosls that was evident by an
`apoptotlc morphology (detected by fluorescence microscopy), the presence of in(cid:173)
`temucfeosomal cleavage of DNA. and the presence of a sub-01 DNA fraction. Using
`the cDNA-array technique, a series of call cycle regulatory genes were found to have
`down-regulated ln 4HPR-treated cells, of which CDC25B, CDK1 (cyclln-dependent
`kinase 1), and CCNB1 (cycUn B1) were 6.5, 10.3 and 14-fold reduced respectively
`when compared to the control. The stress-responsive gene GADD153 was the only
`gene that was up-regulated by 7 -fold. This up-regulation of GADD153 Jn response to
`4HPR treatment was conflrmed by RT-PCR and Western analysis, and was found to
`occur In two other epithelial tumor cell lines establlshed from the head and neck
`region. The up-regulation of GADD153 In CNE3 cells preceded apoptosls after
`application of 4HPR at clinically relevant doses. Treatment of CNE3 cells with the
`MAPK(mltogen-activated protein kinase) kinase inhibitor (PD98059) produced a sim(cid:173)
`ilar up-regulation of GADD153 expression. By contrast, aurintricarboxylic aclcl (ATA),
`a MAPK-acttvator had no effect on GADD153 expression. Taken together, our
`f!ni:fings indicate that treatment of cells with 4HPR first induces a stress-response,
`with en Increase in the expression of GADD153 and this is followed by apoptosis. A
`reduction of the activity of the MEK/MAPK pathway In CNE3 cells may be responsible
`for the up-regulation of GADD153 and further study Is required to exam[ne If the same
`mechanism is adopted by 4HPR to up-regulate the expression of GADD153.
`
`#1970 STl571 Decreases Glucose Derived Nucleic Acid Synthesis but
`Increases Direct Glucose Oxidation in 1<562 Myeloid Blast Cells. Laszlo G.
`Boros, Joan A. Boren, Siivia Marin, Marta Cascante, Shu Lim. Sara Basslilan,
`Ahmed Sayed, and Wain-Nang P. Lee. Department of Biochemistry and Molecular
`Biology, Barcelona, Spain, and Hatbor-UCLA Research and Education Institute,
`T 0TTB11ce, CA.
`.
`Chronic myeloid leukemia cells contain a constitutively active Bcr-Abl tyrosine
`kinase, the target protein of ST1571 phenylaminopyrimldlne class protein kinase
`Inhibitor. Here we provide evidence for metabolic phenotypic changes In cultured
`1<562 human myeloid blast cells after treatment with Increasing doses of STl571. We
`used (1,2-13C2Jglucose as the single tracer end biological inass spectrometry In
`order to delineate glucose derived specific synthesis of RNA ribose, lactate, gluta(cid:173)
`mate and paJmltate. The synthesis pathways of these molecules from glucose de(cid:173)
`termine the rate of cell proflferation, dtfferentlation end apoptosls In leukemla cells,
`which are highly dependent on glucose carbons for their growth. Prol/feratlon of K562
`cells showed a 57%, 74% and a 99.5% decrease whlle glucose derived synthesis of
`RNA also decreased by 7.8%, 34.1% and 41.5% In response to 0.4, 4 and 40 mg/ml
`STI571, respectively. On the other hand, glucose consumption, lactate produciion,
`13C02 release and direct glucose oxidation through G6PD showed a remarked
`dose-dependent Increase in the same cells. These metabolic changes were absent or
`less prominent in Bcr-Abl negative MIA pancreatic adenocarclnoma cells. The leu(cid:173)
`kemia cell growth controlllng characteristics of ST1571 Involve the regulation of
`anabolic glucose use for de novo nucleic acid synthesis through the non-oxidative
`steps of the pentose cycle. The excess glucose not used for nuclelc acid synthesis
`ls re-routed toward direct oxidation through the oxidative steps of the pentose cycle
`and released as lactate Into the cell culture medium. Therefore, the Bcr·Abl tyrosine
`kinase construct ls likely associated with the phosphonlatlon or transcriptional reg(cid:173)
`ulatlon of metabolic enzymes that are Involved In glucose carbon redistribution
`among cell prollferatlon-related macromolecules (RNA, DNA) and direct oxidative
`glucose degradation. The profound metabolic changes observed In response to
`STI-571 treatment Jndicate that leukemia cell growth Is oppositely Influenced by
`Increased glycolysis and the anabolic glucose utlllzing reactions of the non-oxidative
`branch of the pentose cycle.
`
`#1971
`The lmmunosuppressant Rapamycln Inhibits Growth of Human
`Hepatoma Cells Alone or Combined with Tacrollmus, while Tacrollmus
`Alone Accelerates Cell Growth. Guido Schumacher, Marijk.e Oldtmann, Anne
`ROggeberg, Andrea A. Mueller, Jan M. Langrehr, Marcus Bahra, Herwig Gerlach,
`Klaus P. Platz; and Peter Neuhaus. Charft& Campus Virchow Kllnlkum, Humboldt
`Unlverstfy, Berlin, Germany.
`After human organ transplantation the Incidence of a malignant tumors ls up
`to 10% Jn all patients using standardized immunosuppresslve regimens con·
`
`tainlng tacrollmus. Recurrence of hepatoma after liver transplantation occurrs
`in over 50% In patients with high tumor stage and anglolnvasion. The immu·
`nosuppr.esslve drug Rapamycin has been shown to Inhibit the cell cycle In
`various cell systems. We examined the effect on growth of the human hepa(cid:173)
`toma cell llnes SK-Hep1 (wt-p53), Hep3B (mut-p53), and PLC/PRF/5 (mut(cid:173)
`p53) using different concentrations of rapamycln, tacrollmus, and a combina(cid:173)
`tion of both. There was a dose dependent growth Inhibition of all three cancer
`cell lines after treatment with rapamycin after 3 and 5 days with similar
`sensitivity, regardless of the p53 mutation status. Inhibition ranged from 16%
`at 1ng/ mf In Hep38 cells to 74% at 100ng/ml in SK·Hep1 and Hep3B cells
`after 5 days. Treatment with tacrollmus showed a growth stimulating effect on
`all tumor cell lines. Cell proliferation was Increased with a range of 12% after
`5ng/ml to 25% after 1 OOOng/ml after three days In Hep3B cells. The comb!·
`nation of rapamycin and tacrollmus at equal doses resulted in growth Inhibi(cid:173)
`tion of all cancer cells sfmllar to treatment with rapamycln alone. In this
`combined treatment, tacrolimus had no Impact on growth stimulation. Phase
`contrast microscopy revealed that there is no change In cell morphology.
`FACS analysls confirmed that there was no Induction of apoptosls. An In(cid:173)
`crease of the cell fraction In S-phase of up to 50% and G2-phase of up to 20%
`was observed In rapamycin treated cells. No changes were seen Jn tacrollmus
`treated cells. We conclude that rapamycln has strong Inhibition of hepatoma
`cell growth In contrast to tacrollmus, which stimulates hepatoma cell growth.
`lmmunosuppression after liver transplantation containing rapamycin rather
`than tacrollmus may reduce the Incidence of tumor recurrence after !Iver
`transplantatlon.
`
`#1972 Antitumor Activity of RAD001, an Orally Active Rapamycln Derivative.
`lwad Beuvink, Terence O'Rellly, Sabine Zumstein, Frederic Zllberman, Richard Se(cid:173)
`dranl, Sara Kozma, George Thomas, and Heidi A Lane. Friedrich Miescher lnstlMe,
`Basel, Switzsrland, and Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, SWitzerlend.
`RAD001 is a hydroxy-ethyl ether derivative of rapamycin that Is orally
`bloavallable. RAD001 has demonstrated in vitro anti-proliferative activity
`against a number of human tumor cell lines. Concentration response curves,
`with IC1 Os, IC50s and IC90s differing by several orders of magnitude, suggest
`potent Inhibition of cell proliferation but less potency ln killing tumor cells.
`IC50 values ranged from fM to 1LM, Indicating that although some tumor cell
`lines are very sensitive to RAD001 treatment others are intrinsically more
`resistant. Despite these differences in growth response, down-regulation of
`p70S6 kinase activity and reductions In 4E-BP1 phosphorylatipn (downstream
`effectors of the mTOR "Target Of Rapamycln" kinase pathway) were observed
`In both sensitive (A549; IC50; 6fM) and resistant (HCT-116; IC50: 61LM) cell
`lines. Washout experiments further demonstrated a dramatic, sustained
`down-regulation of mTOR targets for up to 2-3 days after a single 30 min
`RAD001 pulse-treatment. These data Indicate that RAD001 has a slmllar
`mechanism of prolonged action as reported for rapamycin; however, resistant
`lines do exist which are able to compensate for RAD001-induced loss of
`mTOR function. In vivo, AAD001 was orally active, inhibiting the growth of
`human tumor xenografts In nude mice at.doses ranging from 0.5-5.0mg/kg/ d.
`At these doses RAD001 was well tolerated.
`
`#1973 Optimized Synergistic Effect When Hyperthermla Precedes 2', 2'
`Dlfluorodeoxycytldine (dFdC, Gemcitablne) By 24 Hours. Roger A. Vertrees,
`Joseph B. Zwlschenberger, and Paul J. Boor. The University of Texas Med/eel
`Branch, Galveston, TX.
`Hyperthermla has been shown to Increase cytotoxiclty of various antineoplastic
`agents. We Investigated the metabolism, cytotoxlclty and sensitizing properties of
`2'. 2' dlfluorodeoxycytldine (dFdC, Gemcitablne) and hyperthermla (HT), alone
`and In three distinct temporal associations on human lung cancer cell lines In
`vitro. A malignant human lung cancer cell llne (BZR-T33) was treated with various
`concentrations (0.1, 0.5, 1.0, 5.0, and 10.0 µM) of dFdC for 30, 60, 120 or 180 min
`to determine dFdC-LD33 (dose necessary to kill 33% of cells). Another aliquot of
`the same cells were subjected to various hyperthermlc temperatures (40, 41, 42,
`43, 43.5, 44"C) for either 60, 120 or 180 min to determine hyperthermla-LD33.
`LD33, dFdC was 0.15 µ.M for 3 h, and for hyperthermia was 43°C for 3 h. Cells
`were divided into six groups dependent on treatment received: no treatment Is
`control (C), hyperthermia LD33 (H), Gemcitabine l033 (G), hyperthermla LD33
`then 24 h later Gemcitabine L033 (H/G), Gamcitablne LD33 then 24 h later
`hyperthermla LD33 (G/H), and simultan~ous hyperthenmla L033 and Gemcitablne
`LD33 (G&H). Cell survival was determined by 7 -day growth cuNes and clonogenic
`assay, cell cycle perturbation was assayed by flow cytometry. Results Indicate
`that when compared to controls, 7-day growth curves show significant reductions
`in number of surviving cells for all treatments: 0.5-log (p< 0.05) reduction for heat
`only, 2-log {p< 0.05) reduction for dFdC only, and a 3.5-log (p<0.05) reduction for
`combined modality. Compared to controls, clonogenlc results show significant
`reductions in surviving fractions and colony size: control 72% and 16.5 mm2, heat
`only 29% and 10.1 mm2 (p<0.05), dFdC only 39% and 9.2 mm2 (p<0.05) and for
`combined modality 12% and 2.7 mm2 (p<0.05). Results indicate that 24 h after
`exposure, control cells had 43% of cells In Go/G1 , 24% in G;!M and 32% In
`S-phase. DFdC-treated cells had 72% of cells accumulated In GofG1o 3.7% ln
`G;!M and 24% In S-phase. Heat-treated cells had 43% In Go/G1, 37% In G2/M,
`and 20% In S-phase. The combined modality of heat followed 24 h later by dFdC
`resulted In .7% of cells In GofG1 , 33% of cells G2'M and 60% In S-ph115e. We
`
`366
`
`Proceedings of the American Ass9clation for Cancer Research • Volume 42 • March 2001
`
`West-Ward Exhibit 1077
`Beuvink 2001 - Page 002
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket