throbber
IMMUNOSUPPRESSION II
`
`Abstract# 456
`THE BENEFIT OF CHILD· TO-PARENT KIDNEY DONATION: AN
`ANALYSIS OF UNOS DATA. Eric P. Cohen, 1 John D. Rosendale,' Christine
`J. Haywood-Bong,2 Sundaram Hariharan. 1 / Division Of Nephro/ogy,
`Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI; 'United Network of Organ
`Sharing, Richmond, VA.
`Unwarranted nsk to the younger donor has been assumed by some nephrologists to
`preclude child-to-parent kidney donation. This has not been tested. We used UNOS
`data to analyze the benefit of child-to-parent (CTP) kidney donation in comparison
`to other living or cadavenc kidney donation. 56,873 pnmary kidney transplant• (tx)
`between 1988 and 1998 were analyzed. Kidney tx type> were child-to-parent (group
`I, n=3,797), other living donor (LO) (group II, n=8,284) and cadaveric donor (group
`III, n=44,792). Rec1p1ents were subd1v1ded by age: 41-50, 51-60, and 61 or older.
`Add1t10nal variables such as· center volumes, donor and recipient gender or race.
`HLA mismatch, CIT, PRA, diabetic status, prior dialysis, and use of anti-rejection
`treatment were used for Cox and logistic regression analyses. Graft and patient
`half-lives were calculated. General results are shown:< P ahgn= ju•ttfy>
`Group
`Grafr Half Life Patient Half Life
`(mo)
`(mo)
`149
`116"'
`127•
`20<
`112
`91
`
`"' P<O 01 vs Group Ill
`
`I ICTPJ
`II (other LO)
`Ill (cadaver)
`For all rtup1ents censored for death with a
`func t1omnR gra/r
`24 I,,..
`I (CfP)
`211 **
`II (other LD)
`160
`Ill (cadavcnc)
`Logistic regression for I year graft failure revealed lower graft failure rates with CTP
`compared to cadavenc tx (34%, P<0.05) and lower death rates (23%, P<0.05). Cox
`proportial hazard model for post-I year revealed similar lower graft failure (18%,
`P<0.05) and death rates (13%, P<0.05). A surfeit ofO mismatch tx in group II accounts
`for their advantage over group I. The I ID 3,000 mortahty nsk from kidney donatton
`translates to -65 years of lost life in the 3,797 CTP kidney donors of this study.
`Because of the 17 month average gain in patient survival (149-132 mo.), we estimate
`-5,500 patient-years of increased survival for the group of CTP versus cadavenc
`kidney tx ID this study. This projected gain was seen in all age groups, but was
`smaller ID diabetic recipients over age 60. We conclude that graft and pallent survival
`is prolonged by using CTP compared to cadavenc kidneys. CTP kidney tx i• well
`worth 1ts risk, will tend to enhance organ ;upply, and should be considered whenever
`possible.
`
`p = n~
`
`Abstract# 457
`LONG-TERM RESULTS IN KIDNEY TRANSPLANTATION
`FROM HLA-IDENTICAL LIVING DONORS: A SINGLE·
`CENTER EXPERIENCE. Hiroaki Shimmura, 1 Kazunari Tanabe,1
`Tadahiko Tokumoto, 1 Nobuo Ishikawa,' Shohei Fuchinoue.' Hiroshi
`Toma.' 1Department of Urology, Kidney Center, Tokyo Women's
`Medical University, Tokyo; 'Department of Surgery, Kidney Center,
`Tokyo Women's Medical University, Tokyo, Japan.
`Background: Due to the cont1Duing shortage of cadaveric donors ID Japan, 1iv1Dg
`kidney transplantation has been carried out. Since livmg kidney transplantat10n is
`usually performed between parent and child, HLA-identical donor livlDg kidney
`transplantation is uncommon. According to UNOS (United Network for Organ
`Shanng) data, I 0-year graft survival was approximately 10% higher in HLA-matched
`cadavenc kidney transplantation than in HLA-matched transplantation. However
`the long-term results of kidney transplantatton from HLA-identical hvlDg donors is
`still unclear. Therefore we compared the survival rate in HLA-idenucal and HLA(cid:173)
`nonidentical living kidney transplantation.
`Matenals and Methods: One thousand and seventy-nine rec1p1ents who underwent
`living kidney transplantation at our institution between February 1983, and December
`1999, were enrolled ID this study. They were subd1v1ded into an HLA-identical
`donor group (group I, n=96) and an HLA-nonidentical donor group (group 2.
`n=983). All patients were treated with cyclosporine- or tacrohmus-based
`1mmunosuppression, includ1Dg methylprednisolone and azathtoprine or m1zonbine
`Results: The mean rec1p1ent age was 38.1 years in group I and 31.9 years in group 2
`(not s1gmficant). The mean donor age was s1gmficantly lower ID group I than ID
`group 2 (44.3 years vs 53.5 years, respectively; p<0.001) Patient survival was not
`sigmficantly different between the two groups (94.4% and 89.8% m group I, 93.8%
`and 89.3% ID group 2 at 5 and IO years, respecttvely). There was a s1gmficant
`difference in graft survival between the two groups (87.5% and 74.8% in group I,
`75.7% and 57 .2% in group 2 at 5 and IO years, respectively, p = 0.0025). The
`1Dc1dence of acute rejection was 11.5% and 58.3% m groups I and 2, respectively (P
`= 0.001 ). Although a higher donor age was associated with poorer graft survival,
`after adjustment for donor age, graft survival was also higher ID group I than ID
`group 2 (P = 0.0195 by Cox regression analysis).
`Conclusions: Although the 1Dcidence of acute rejection was much lower ID HLA(cid:173)
`identtcal livmg kidney transplantation, the I 0-year graft survival was only 15%
`higher. Therefore 11 1s speculated that the outcome of long-term hving kidney
`transplantat10n would be affected more by a non-1mmunolog1cal factor than HLA(cid:173)
`matchmg.
`
`250
`
`Abstract# 458
`DECLINING INFLUENCE OF RACE ON THE OUTCOME OF
`LIVING DONOR RENAL TRANSPLANTATION. Stephen R.
`Smith, 1 David W. Butterly.' 1Department of Medicine, Division of
`Nephrology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC.
`A racial disparity in graft survival for renal transplant recipients has been documented
`both for cadavenc and living donor transplants. In the present single center study we
`analyzed graft survival by race for recipients of living donor kidney transplants in
`three eras: 1985-1989, 1990-1994, and 1995-1998. Living donor transplants were
`selected for study to mimm1ze confoundmg factors related to donor kidney cond1tton
`and HLA match1Dg. There was an inten•ification of the immunosuppre;;ant regimen
`beginning ID 1996 such that all patients received cyclosponne or tacrolimus with
`mycophenolate mofetil and prednisone. There were 76 black rec1p1ents and 174 white
`recipients with no difference ID mean age, degree of HLA matching, or proport10n of
`rec1p1ents with diabetes as the cause of end-stage renal disease. Using all data from
`1985-1998, graft survival was numerically better for whites versus blacks for O, 1,
`and 2 haplotype matched transplants, adjusting for age, gender, diabetes, and era of
`the transplant. However, when analyzed by era of the transplant, there was a temporal
`trend for a progressive decrease in the racial dispanty in graft survival, such that no
`difference was apparent ID the most recent era.
`1985-19!19
`1990-1994
`'i yr
`N
`I yr
`N
`I yr
`graft ~urv graft mrv
`graft ~urv
`
`1995·1998
`N
`I yr
`graft ~urv
`
`'Y'
`graft surv
`
`'i yr
`grafl ~urv
`
`14 %%
`94%
`6!1%
`!17%
`22
`Black 20 8l'l
`l9'l
`79%
`42 q4%
`H2%
`5oli 94%
`78%
`White 77 92'l
`In confirmation of this effect, there was a s1gmficant race by era mteract1on (p<.04) on
`multivariable Cox proportional hazards analysis. The most recent data from the USRDS
`are consistent with this not10n. Of those hvlDg donor rec1p1ents s1Dce 1990 who lost
`their grafts, the cause of graft loss was death with a funct10n1Dg graft for 9/24 (38%)
`whites versus only I/I I (9%) blacks. Immunologic graft loss was more common in
`blacks 7/11 (64%) than whites 9/24 (38%). Almost one quarter of the graft losses in
`both groups since 1990 were directly attributable to the patient having self(cid:173)
`discontinued one or more of the 1mmunosuppressant agents.
`We conclude that improved immunosuppression and other factors have closed the
`outcome gap between blacks and whites receiving living donor kidney transplants.
`
`CONCURRENT SESSION 24:
`IMMUNOSUPPRESSION II
`
`Abstract# 459
`RAPAMYCIN INHIBITS TUMOR GROWTH AND METASTASIS
`IN MICE BY ANTIANGIOGENESIS. Philipp v. Breitenbuch, 1
`Markus Guba.' Edward K. Geissler,' Gudrun Koehl,' Stefan Farkas,1
`Carl Zuelke,' Malhi as Anthuber, 1 Karl-Walter Jauch,' Markus
`Steinbauer.' 1Surgery, University of Regenshurg, Regenshurg, Germany.
`Background: Immunosuppressive drugs are effective in reducing rejection in organ
`transplantation. However, cancer development and recurrence are om1Dous risk factors
`for these 1mmunocompromised patients. Here, we show that the new
`1mmunosuppress1ve drug rapamyclD (RAPA) may have a umque ab1hty to reduce the
`risk of cancer, while simultaneously providing effective immunosuppression.
`Methods: Balb/c mice were treated by daily i.p. injection of saline (control), RAPA
`( 1.5 mg/kg). or cyclosporine (IO mg/kg, CsA). The effect of RAPA and CsA on meta•tatic
`tumor growth was tested after intraportal 1Dject1on of syngenic CT-26 adenocarc1Doma
`cells, and is expressed as the% ofhver replaced by tumor(day 11 ). Also, the effect of
`RAPA and CsA on tumor growth and angiogenesis was evaluated in a dorsal skin(cid:173)
`fold chamber by mtrav1tal m1cro•copy (IVM). Besides direct tumor-vessel
`v1suahzauon, tumor size and vessel density were measured by IVM. Blood vascular
`endothehal growth factor (VEGF) levels were measured by ELISA. Results: RAPA
`IDhtbned, while C,A 't1mulated, liver metasta.is of CT-26 cells(% liver replacement:
`saline=l5±3, RAPA=l±I, and CsA=35±6; n=7). Histological analysis of livers
`showed small avascular meta,ta•es ID RAPA-treated mice, whereas, CsA induced the
`growth of large vascular tumor mas>es. Compared to control mice, growth of tumor
`implants in dorsal •kin-fold chambers on day 11 was reduced in RAPA-treated mice,
`and increased with CsA (tumor volume ID mm': saline=l58±32, RAPA=33±12, and
`CsA=207±80; n=7). Importantly, RAPA markedly 1Dhib1ted, and CsA induced, tumor
`angiogenes1s, as evidenced by lower and higher tumor-m1crovascular density,
`respectively (density in cm': saline=l 16±9, RAPA=35±6, and CsA=l79±14, n=7).
`All stated effects were statistically s1gmficant (P<0.05) and confirmed by direct
`IVM tumor v1suahzat1on. A possible mechanistic link to the antiangiogenic RAPA
`effect wa• found through the reduced serum VEGF levels m RAPA-treated tumor(cid:173)
`bearing mice (ID pg/ml: saltne=60±3, RAPA=32±2, and CsA=79±14; n=7).
`Conclusion· RAPA IDhibits, while C,A promote>. tumor growth and metastasis in
`mice. Furthermore, the antitumoral effect of RAPA could be ltnked to VEGF
`antagomsm. Therefore, treatment of transplant rejection with RAPA may have a
`di;tinct advantage over conventional C•A u•e when there is a relatively high risk for
`previous tumor recurrence or de nol'O cancer development.
`
`West-Ward Exhibit 1060
`Breitenbuch #459 2001
`Page 001
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket