throbber
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . REPORTS
`Structure of the FKBP12-Rapamycin
`Complex Interacting with the Binding
`Domain of Human FRAP
`Jungwon Choi,* Jie Chen, Stuart L. Schreiber, Jon Clardyt
`
`Rapamycin, a potent immunosuppressive agent, binds two proteins: the FK506-binding
`protein (FKBP12) and the FKBP-rapamycin-associated protein (FRAP). A crystal struc(cid:173)
`ture of the ternary complex of human FKBP12, rapamycin, and the FKBP12-rapamycin(cid:173)
`binding (FRB) domain of human FRAP at a resolution of 2. 7 angstroms revealed the two
`proteins bound together as a result of the ability of rapamycin to occupy two different
`hydrophobic binding pockets simultaneously. The structure shows extensive interac(cid:173)
`tions between rapamycin and both proteins, but fewer interactions between the proteins.
`The structure of the FRB domain of FRAP clarifies both rapamycin-independent and
`-dependent effects observed for mutants of FRAP and its homologs in the family of
`proteins related to the ataxia-telangiectasia mutant gene product, and it illustrates how
`a small cell-permeable molecule can mediate protein dimerization.
`
`A dividing cell must pass various check(cid:173)
`points as it proceeds through the cell cycle,
`and error-free division requires the ability to
`rectify DNA lesions (1, 2). The ataxia-telan(cid:173)
`giectasia mutant (A TM) gene product, the
`catalytic subunit of the DNA-dependent pro(cid:173)
`tein kinase, and the products of yeast genes
`such as TORI, TOR2, and MECJ (ESRJ) are
`members of a family of large molecular size
`proteins that participate in cell cycle progres(cid:173)
`sion and checkpoints as well as in DNA repair
`and recombination ( 1-4 ). All members of the
`A TM family contain a COOH-terminal ki(cid:173)
`nase domain (1-4), but no structural informa(cid:173)
`tion is available for any domain of any family
`member. Human FRAP (rat RAFT), one
`member of this family, is a 289-kD protein
`that binds FKBPl 2-rapamycin, regulates p 70
`ribosomal protein S6 kinase, and is required
`for G 1 cell cycle progression in several cell
`types (5-7).
`The potent immunosuppressive agents
`FK506 (8) and rapamycin (9-11) (Fig. lA)
`share the same cellular target: the 12-kD
`FK506-binding protein, FKBPl 2 ( 12, 13). Al(cid:173)
`though both rapamycin and FK506 bind to
`FKBP12 with high affinity [dissociation con(cid:173)
`stant (KJ), 0.2 to 0.4 nM], they effect im(cid:173)
`munosuppression through different mecha(cid:173)
`nisms. Whereas FK506 interrupts the signal
`from the T cell receptor, rapamycin inter(cid:173)
`rupts the signal from the interleukin-2 re(cid:173)
`ceptor and the receptors for other cytokines
`and growth factors (14). Binding of similar
`molecules, such as FK506 and rapamycin,
`
`J. Choi and J. Clardy, Department of Chemistry, Baker
`Laboratory, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853-1301,
`USA.
`J. Chen and S. L. Schreiber, Howard Hughes Medical
`Institute and Department of Chemistry and Chemical Bi(cid:173)
`ology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA.
`
`*Present address: Department of Chemistry, Suwon Uni(cid:173)
`versity, Kyunggi 445-773, South Korea.
`tTo whom correspondence should be addressed.
`
`to the same protein can disrupt different sig(cid:173)
`nals because the protein-ligand complexes,
`(not the individual components) are the
`active entities {14}. FKBP12-FK506 inhib(cid:173)
`its calcineurin, a serine-threonine phos(cid:173)
`phatase (15), whereas FKBP12-rapamycin
`binds to FRAP (5). Thus, small cell-perme(cid:173)
`able molecules can induce proteins to asso(cid:173)
`ciate in a manner similar to that by which
`growth factors (such as human growth hor(cid:173)
`mone), cytokines (such as interleukin-2),
`and intracellular signaling proteins (such as
`GRB2) induce dimerization of signaling
`proteins. These naturally occurring induc(cid:173)
`ers of dimerization have inspired the design
`of synthetic molecules that induce dimer(cid:173)
`ization of intracellular proteins and result
`in the activation of cytoplasmic signaling
`pathways (16).
`FK506 and rapamycin bind FKBP12 in a
`hydrophobic pocket, and an important feature
`of both FKBP12-ligand structures is the large
`fraction, -50%, of ligand exposed on the
`exterior of the complex (17-19). A composite
`surface-a surface with contributions from
`both ligand (FK506 or rapamycin) and the
`protein (FKBP12)-mediates the interaction
`of the FKBP12-ligand complex with its target
`(14 ). Two independent x-ray structures of the
`ternary FKBP12-FK506-calcineurin complex
`show a composite binding surface with exten(cid:173)
`sive contacts between FK506 and its protein
`partners as well as between the protein part(cid:173)
`ners themselves (20, 21). We now present a
`2. 7 A x-ray structure that shows how rapamy(cid:173)
`cin mediates
`the heterodimerization of
`FKBP12 with FRAP.
`Binding of FRAP to FKBP12-rapamycin
`(KJ = 2 nM) is mediated by a small domain,
`the FKBP12-rapamycin-binding (FRB) do(cid:173)
`main, that can be expressed as a 12-kD soluble
`protein (22). Crystals (23) of the ternary
`FKBP12-rapamycin-FRB complex were pre-
`
`pared and the structure was solved (24) by a
`combination of molecular replacement (MR)
`with isomorphous replacement for a single
`anomalously scattering derivative (SIRAS)
`(Fig. 1, Band C). The resulting MR-SIRAS
`map was readily interpretable, and the struc(cid:173)
`ture was refined to a final R factor of 0.193
`(8.0 to 2.7 A data). The ternary complex has
`a roughly rectan$1Jlar sh~pe with 0overall di(cid:173)
`mensions of 60 A by 45 A by 35 A. The two
`protein components are virtually the same
`size, and rapamycin is almost completely bur(cid:173)
`ied between them. The ternary complex fea(cid:173)
`tures an extensive array of rapamycin-protein
`interactions in two binding pockets lined with
`aromatic residues. FKBP12 contains a large ~
`sheet composed of five antiparallel ~ strands
`(17-19). A short amphipathic a helix is
`pressed against this sheet, and rapamycin
`binds in a hydrophobic pocket formed be(cid:173)
`tween the a helix and ~ sheet. Three loops-(cid:173)
`the 40s loop, which is a bulge in ~5, the 50s
`loop connecting ~5 to a, and the 80s loop
`connecting ~2 to ~3--surround and contrib(cid:173)
`ute to the binding pocket. In general, the
`structure of the FKBP12-rapamycin portion of
`the ternary complex does not differ from that
`of the binary FKBPl 2-rapamycin complex
`(18, 19), and the overall root-mean-square
`deviation between the binary and ternary
`complex is 1.14 A for all atoms and 0.49 A for
`main chain atoms.
`The FRB domain of FRAP forms a four(cid:173)
`helix bundle, a common structural motif in
`globular proteins (25). Its overall dimensions
`are 30 A by 45 A by 30 A, and all four helices
`(al to a4) have short underhand connec(cid:173)
`tions similar to the cytochrome b562 fold
`(26); The NH2- and COOH-termini of the
`FRB domain are close to each other, suggest(cid:173)
`ing that an FRB-type domain could be in(cid:173)
`serted into other protein chains. The longest
`helix, a3, has a 60° bend at Tyr2°74, roughly
`one-third of the distance from its NHz-ter(cid:173)
`minus, and the a2 helix has a small region
`(Gly2049 to Leu2051 ) that deviates from a
`standard a helix. Ignoring the first 10 resi(cid:173)
`dues of a3, all four helices are -26 A in
`length and comprise 16 to 19 residues. The
`al and a2 helices are almost parallel (inter(cid:173)
`helical angle of 22°), as are a3 and a4 (20°),
`whereas the crossing angles between the al(cid:173)
`a2 pair and the a3-a4 pair range from 30° to
`60°. The parallel helices are also closer. He(cid:173)
`lices al-a2 and a3-a4 show the shortest
`interhelical distances of 6.3 and 7 .2 A, re(cid:173)
`spectively, whereas other closest interhelical
`contacts range from 10 to 14 A. Most of the
`hydrophobic and aromatic residues are locat(cid:173)
`ed in the interhelical regions, and the hydro(cid:173)
`philic residues are exposed to solvent. The
`first and last helices of the bundle, al and
`a4, form a deep cleft near their crossing
`point, and this cleft, which is lined by six
`aromatic side chains, forms the hydrophobic
`
`SCIENCE • VOL. 273
`
`• 12 JULY 1996
`
`239
`
`West-Ward Exhibit 1057
`Choi 1996
`Page 001
`
`

`

`pocket in which rapamycin binds.
`Rapamycin interacts extensively with both
`FKBP12 and FRB.
`Its
`interactions with
`FKBP12 resemble those described for the bi(cid:173)
`nary complex and feature extensive contacts
`with conserved aromatic residues and five hy(cid:173)
`drogen bonds (18 , 19). Trp59 forms the base
`of the binding pocket and contacts the pipe(cid:173)
`colinyl ring (C2 to N7)-the most deeply
`buried portion of rapamycin. A total of 460
`A2 (44%) of the solvent-accessible surface
`area of rapamycin is buried in FKBP12. Rapa(cid:173)
`mycin also interacts with the FRB domain of
`FRAP through close contacts with aromatic
`residues, and a series of interactions along the
`triene arm of rapamycin (C16 to C23) involv(cid:173)
`ing Phe2039, Trp2101, Tyr21os. and Phe21os
`appear especially important (Fig. 2 ). Ser2035,
`Leu2031, Thf209B Asp2102, and Tyr203B also
`make contact with rapamycin. There are no
`hydrogen bonds in the FRB-rapamycin inter(cid:173)
`action, and 340 A2 (33%) of the solvent(cid:173)
`accessible surface area of rapamycin partici(cid:173)
`pate in the interaction. A small, but impor(cid:173)
`tant, conformational change in rapamycin is
`evident between the binary (FKBP12-rapamy(cid:173)
`cin) and ternary (FKBP12-rapamycin-FRB)
`complexes. In crystal structures of uncom(cid:173)
`plexed rapamycin (27) and the FKBP12-rapa(cid:173)
`mycin complex (18), the triene arm of rapa(cid:173)
`mycin is planar, with the three double bonds
`fully conjugated. In the ternary complex, ro(cid:173)
`tations of -15° about C18-C19 and 37°
`about C20-C21 slightly disrupt the conjuga(cid:173)
`tion and move the most deeply buried portion
`of rapamycin, the methyl group attached to
`C23, by 1.6 A (Fig. 1). This conformational
`alteration of rapamycin avoids a close contact
`with Phe2108 and places the deeply buried
`methyl group in a small crease between
`Phe2108 and Leu2031 (Fig. 2). The macrocyclic
`loop of rapamycin is eight carbon atoms larger
`than the corresponding loop in FK506, and
`the triene portion of rapamycin reduces the
`conformational flexibility of the loop and
`holds it away from the surface of FKBP12-it
`organizes the loop for binding into a deep
`pocket. Our analysis suggests that the limited
`tlexibiliry of the triene arm might also be an
`important feature of the structure of rapamy(cid:173)
`cin. If FK506 and rapamycin are overlaid, the
`much shorter loop of FK506 does not ap(cid:173)
`proach the binding pocket of the FRB domain
`of FRAP.
`Although rapamycin interacts extensively
`with both protein partners, the extent to
`which the proteins interact with each other is
`relatively limited (Fig. 2). Two regions of the
`complex show interactions between the pro(cid:173)
`teins: the 40s loop ofFKBP12 with cx4 ofFRB,
`and the 80s loop of FKBP12 with the cxl-cx2
`region of FRB. In the 40s-cx4 interaction, the
`OH group ofTyr2105 and the 0 atom ofLys47
`make a short contact and there is also a
`water-mediated salt bridge. In the other inter-
`
`•
`
`• •
`•
`•
`
`• •
`•
`
`c
`
`2065
`
`N
`
`2060
`
`•
`
`•
`
`•
`
`I •
`•
`
`,C)
`
`I_
`
`'r
`
`c
`
`2023
`
`2074
`
`2110
`
`n4
`
`n1
`
`a3
`
`a2
`
`114
`
`113
`
`n1
`
`FRB
`
`2044
`
`2091
`
`115
`
`2042
`
`2095
`
`80s loop
`
`112
`
`111
`
`FKBP12
`
`Fig. 1. (A} Chemical structure of rapamycin. (B} The 2F0 - Fe electron density of the FRB domain of the
`FKBP12-rapamycin-FRB complex (24) (F0 , observed structure factor; Fe• calculated structure factor}. A
`model of the final structure is embedded in this inttial electron density. (CJ Overall structure of the ternary
`complex between FKBP12 (blue ribbon}, rapamycin (ball and stick), and the FRB domain of FRAP (red
`ribbon}. Secondary structural elements are labeled with the conventional numbering scheme for FKBP12.
`N and C, NHr and COOH-termini, respectively. The drawing in (C) was prepared wtth RIBBONS (31}.
`
`action region, the NH2 group of Arg2042
`makes short contacts with Oy 1 of Thr85 and
`the 0 atom of Gly86, and there are two water(cid:173)
`mediated interactions. Although the number
`of interprotein polar interactions is moderate,
`400 A 2 of solvent-accessible surface area,
`roughly equivalent to the surface area buried
`by FKBP12-rapamycin or FRB-rapamycin,
`participate in the interaction between them.
`The 80s loop of FKBP12 appears to be one
`region where the structure of FKBP12 differs
`between the binary and ternary complexes,
`with the major change being around Ile90,
`where both side chain and main chain devi(cid:173)
`ations are apparent. These deviations move
`FKBP12 away from the FRB domain, suggest(cid:173)
`ing repulsion between the proteins in this
`region.
`The residues that form the rapamycin
`binding pocket of FRAP (Fig. 2) are con(cid:173)
`served
`in yeast Torlp, Tor2p, and rat
`RAFfl-other ATM family members that
`
`bind FKBP12-rapamycin-and thus all four
`proteins are likely to contain a hydrophobic
`pocket with similar architecture and related
`function. Overexpression of the Ser1972 (cor(cid:173)
`responding to Ser2°35 of FRAP) -
`Ile mutant
`of Torlp results in marked inhibition of cell
`growth that is dependent on the kinase activ(cid:173)
`ity of the mutant (28). These results indicate
`that the site bearing the Ser mutation may
`regulate the neighboring kinase domain of
`Torlp (28). The conserved binding pocket
`associated with a regulatory function suggests
`that binding of an as yet unidentified ligand
`may regulate kinase activity. The shape of
`the binding pocket and the cxl-cx4 crossing
`angle are mutually dependent; thus, ligand
`binding could result in a change in the cross(cid:173)
`ing angle, and the domain could function as
`a ligand-dependent conformational switch.
`FKBPl 2 might adjust the crossing angle
`(possibly by having its 80s loop repel the
`cxl-cx2 helical pair of the FRB domain of
`
`240
`
`SCIENCE
`
`• VOL. 273
`
`• 12 JULY 1996
`
`West-Ward Exhibit 1057
`Choi 1996
`Page 002
`
`

`

`. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11111111111111111111 . . lllBllllBl . . llllllllBllllBllllBIREPORTS
`
`~6
`
`3,. lle90
`
`~99 -~ ._J Asp37
`ps--\ b
`
`Phe~;?>/
`v --270
`
`(
`
`-::
`
`lie·~
`
`01
`
`3. Thr2098
`-"1m
`~r21os ~2101
`
`tsp 2102
`
`~he21oa
`
`fuu20J1
`
`Gln53
`
`o--e Ligand bond
`o------e Nonligand bond
`0-3 o.e Hydrogen bond and its length
`
`His53 Nonligand residues involved in
`~ hydrophobic contacts
`
`... Corresponding atoms involved
`in hydrophobic contacts
`
`Fig. 2. Interactions of rapamycin with FKBP12 and FRB. (A) A LIGPLOT
`(32) rendering of the interactions of rapamycin with FKBP1 2 and FRB.
`Hydrogen bonds are shown by dashed lines (with lengths in angstroms),
`and hydrophobic interactions by surface dashes. (B) Close-up of the inter(cid:173)
`actions of rapamycin (ball and stick) with the FRB domain of FRAP (red
`ribbon). Residue numbering is based on that for FRAP. (C) Complementa(cid:173)
`rity plot of rapamycin with FKBP12 and the FRB domain of FRAP (33). High
`complementarity is indicated by purple. FKBP12 is on the right and the
`opening of the deep cavity where the pipecolinyl moiety is buried is visible.
`The FRB domain of FRAP is on the left, and the most deeply buried methyl
`group is shown disappearing into the FRB cavity.
`
`FRAP) so that the FRB pocket is optimized
`for rapamycin binding.
`Mutation of Ser2035 to Thr in FRAP
`renders the protein insensitive to the in(cid:173)
`hibitory effects of the FKBP12-rapamycin
`complex; the extra bulk of Thr2035 may
`prevent binding of rapamycin in the pock(cid:173)
`et (7) (Fig. 2). Mutations of Trp2101 and
`Phe 2108 also confer rapamycin resistance
`these residues also
`interact
`(29). and
`strongly with rapamycin (Fig. 2).
`Our data provide a structural frame(cid:173)
`work for understanding the rapamycin(cid:173)
`based dimerization of FKBP12 and FRAP.
`Comparison of the FKBP12-FK506-cal(cid:173)
`cineurin structure (20, 21) with
`the
`FKBPl 2-rapamycin-FRB structure reveals
`different strategies for the two dimeriza(cid:173)
`tion modes. Whereas FK506-induced
`dimerization features extensive protein-
`
`protein interactions, rapamycin-induced
`dimerization does not. Because rapamycin(cid:173)
`induced protein dimerization can form the
`basis for regulating gene transcription and
`other cellular processes (30), such struc(cid:173)
`ture-based modifications of the interac(cid:173)
`tion might have important practical con(cid:173)
`sequences. The structure also provides in(cid:173)
`sights into structural features and possible
`regulation of the A TM family of proteins.
`
`REFERENCES AND NOTES
`
`1. C. T. Keith and S. L. Schreiber, Science 270, 50
`(1995).
`2. V. A. Zakian, Ce// 82, 685 (1995).
`3. T. Hunter, ibid. 83, 1 (1995).
`4. S. P. Jackson: Curr. Biol. 5, 1210 (1995).
`5. E. J. Brown et al., Nature 369, 756 (1994).
`6. D. Sabatini, H. Erdjument-Bromage, M. Lui, P.
`Tempst, S. Snyder, Cell 78, 35 (1994).
`7. E. J. Brown et al., Nature 377, 441 (1995).
`
`8. H. Tanaka et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 109, 5031
`(1987).
`9. D. C. N. Swindells, P. S. White, J. A. Findlay, Can. J.
`Chem. 56, 2491 (1978).
`10. S. N. Sehgal, H. Baker, C. Vezina, J. Antibiot. 28,
`727 (1975).
`11 . C. Vezina, A. Kudelski, S. N. Sehgal, ibid., p. 721.
`12. M. W. Harding, A. Galat, D. E. Uehling, S. L. Schrei(cid:173)
`ber, Nature 341, 758 (1989).
`13. J. J. Siekierka, S. H. Y. Hung, M. Poe, C. S. Lin, N. H.
`Sigal, ibid., p. 755.
`14. S. L. Schreiber, Science 251, 283 (1991 ).
`15. J. Liu et al., Cell 66, 807 (1991).
`16. D. M. Spencer, T. J. Wandless, S. L. Schreiber, G. R.
`Crabtree, Science 262, 1019 (1993); P. J. Belshaw,
`S. N. Ho, G. R. Crabtree, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.
`U.S.A. 93, 4604 (1996).
`17. G.D. Van Duyne, R. F. Standaert, P. A. Karplus, S. L.
`Schreiber, J. Clardy, Science 251, 839 (1991).
`18. G. D. Van Duyne, R. F. Standaert, S. L. Schreiber, J.
`Clardy. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 113, 7 433 (1991 ).
`19. G. D. Van Duyne, R. F. Standaert, P. A. Karplus, S. L.
`Schreiber, J. Clardy, J. Mo/. Biol. 229, 105 (1993).
`20. C. R. Kissinger et al., Nature 378, 641 (1995).
`21. J. P. Griffith et al., Cell 82, 507 (1995).
`22. J. Chen, X. F. Zheng, E. J. Brown, S. L. Schreiber,
`
`SCIENCE
`
`• VOL. 273
`
`• 12 JULY 1996
`
`241
`
`West-Ward Exhibit 1057
`Choi 1996
`Page 003
`
`

`

`Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 92, 4947 (1995).
`23. The expression and purification of recombinant hu(cid:173)
`man FKBP12 (19) and the FRB domain of human
`FRAP (22) have been described. Crystals of
`FKBP12-rapamycin-FRB were grown in 2 to 3
`weeks at room temperature from hanging drops
`prepared from FKBP1 2 [10 mg/ml, in 10 mM tris(cid:173)
`HCI (pH 8.0)], two equivalents of rapamycin (in
`methanol), and one equivalent of FRB [10 mg/ml, in
`50 mM tris-HCI (pH 8.0)]. The well solution con(cid:173)
`tained 20% (w/v) polyethylene glycol 8000, 10%
`methypentanediol, and 10 mM tris-HCI (pH 8.5).
`The rod-shaped crystals are orthorhombic, space
`group P2 12 12 1 with cell constants a = 44.63,
`b = 52.14, and c = 102.53 A, and contain one
`ternary complex in the asymmetrical unit.
`24. Data to a resolution of 2.7 A (43,447 measure(cid:173)
`ments of 6920 unique reflections, 98.5% complete,
`Rsym = 0.071) were collected from a crystal of
`dimensions 0.3 mm by 0.2 mm by 0.1 mm with the
`use of a San Diego multiwire area detector on a
`Rigaku RU-200 rotating anode x-ray source. Ex(cid:173)
`perimental phases were obtained from MR and
`SIRAS. MR with X-PLOR [AT. Brunger, J. Kuriyan,
`M. Karplus, Science 235, 458 (1987)] and the
`FKBP12-rapamycin model (19) yielded a clear so(cid:173)
`lution, but the resulting electron density map was
`noisy. A mercury derivative was prepared (2 mM
`HgCl2 , overnight), and the two heavy atom sites
`were refined with PHASES [W. Furey and S.
`Swaminathan, ACA Abstr. 18, 73 (1990)]. Anoma(cid:173)
`lous dispersion measurements were included in
`this data set and 16 cycles of solvent flattening
`were applied (PHASES). The resulting electron
`density map clearly showed the four-helix-bundle
`architecture of FRB. The FKBP12-rapamycin por(cid:173)
`tion of the structure was well defined in the initial
`electron density map, and minor changes in the
`backbone of the 30s loop and some side chains
`were sufficient to fit the model. For the FRB portion,
`most of a polyalanine chain could be traced for the
`helical regions of the initial map. After several cy(cid:173)
`cles of positional refinement (X-PLOR), loop re(cid:173)
`gions could also be traced and the side chains
`assigned. CHAIN [J. S. Sack, J. Mo/. Graphics 6,
`244 (1988)] was used for model fitting and building
`the structure. A total of 95 residues in the FRB
`domain of FRAP (three residues in the NH2 -termi(cid:173)
`nal and two residues in the COOH-terminal regions
`showed no electron density and were not includ(cid:173)
`ed), all residues of FKBP12, all atoms of rapamycin,
`and 23 water molecules were included in the final
`model. FRB residues are numbered according to
`FRAP numbering. The current R factor is 0.193
`(R,, •• = 0.299) for data from 8 to 2.7 A. The root(cid:173)
`mean-square deviations of bond lengths and bond
`angles are 0.008 A and 1.48°, respectively. The
`average temperature factors for all atoms and main
`chain atoms are 17.0 and 14.7 A2. respectively.
`25. N. L. Harris, S. R. Presnell, F. E. Cohen, J. Mo/. Biol.
`236, 1356 (1994).
`26. F. Lederer, A. Glatigny, P. H. Bethge, H. D. Bellamy,
`F. S. Mathews, ibid. 148, 427 (1981).
`27. J. A. Findlay and L. Radics, Can. J. Chem. 58, 579
`(1980).
`28. X. F. Zheng, D. Fiorentino, J. Chen, G. R. Crabtree,
`S. L. Schreiber, Ce// 82, 121 (1995).
`29. M. C. Lorenz and J. Heitman, J. Biol. Chem. 270,
`27531 (1995).
`30. V. M. Rivera et al., Nature Med., in press.
`31. M. Carson, J. Mo/. Graphics 5, 103 (1987).
`32. A. C. Wallace, R. A. Laskowski, J.M. Thornton, Prot.
`Engin. 8, 127 (1995).
`33. A. Nicholls, K. Sharp, B. Honig, GRASP Manual (Co(cid:173)
`lumbia Univ. Press, New York, 1992).
`34. We thank S. Ealick, J. Liang, and R. Gillilan for dis(cid:173)
`cussions. The Cornell work was funded in part by
`USPHS grant CA59021 (to J.C.) and the Harvard
`work by an Irvington Institute Fellowship (to J.C.) and
`USPHS grant GM38625 (to S.L.S.). S.L.S. is a
`Howard Hughes Medical
`Institute
`Investigator.
`Atomic coordinates have been deposited in the Pro(cid:173)
`tein Data Bank under the accession number 1 FAP.
`
`15 March 1996; accepted 15 May 1996
`
`Long-Term Lymphohematopoietic
`Reconstitution by a Single CD34-Low/Negative
`Hematopoietic Stem Cell
`Masatake Osawa,* Ken-ichi Hanada, Hirofumi Hamada,
`Hiromitsu Nakauchit
`
`Hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) supply all blood cells throughout life by making use of
`their self-renewal and multilineage differentiation capabilities. A monoclonal antibody
`raised to the mouse homolog of CD34 (mCD34) was used to purify mouse HSCs to near
`homogeneity. Unlike in humans, primitive adult mouse bone marrow HSCs were de(cid:173)
`tected in the mCD34 low to negative fraction. Injection of a single mCD34101-, c-Kit+,
`Sca-1 +, lineage markers negative (Lin-) cell resulted in long-term reconstitution of the
`lymphohematopoietic system in 21 percent of recipients. Thus, the purified HSC pop(cid:173)
`ulation should enable analysis of the self-renewal and multilineage differentiation of
`individual HSCs.
`
`CD34 is a marker of human HSCs, and all
`colony-forming activity of human bone mar(cid:173)
`row (BM) cells is found in the CD34-positive
`fraction (1 ). Clinical transplantation studies
`that used enriched CD34 + BM cells also in(cid:173)
`dicated the presence of HSCs with long-term
`BM reconstitution ability within this frac(cid:173)
`tion (2). After isolation of the human
`CD34 gene, the mouse homolog (mCD34)
`was isolated by cross-hybridization (3). To
`examine the expression and function of
`mCD34, we raised a monoclonal antibody
`(mAb), 49E8 [rat immunoglobulin G2a
`(IgG2a)), to mCD34 by immunizing rats
`with a glutathione-S-transferase (GST)(cid:173)
`mCD34 fusion protein. This mAb stained
`BaF3 cells transfected with a full-length
`mCD34 cDNA but not mock-transfected
`cells (4). Murine cell lines such as PA6,
`NIH 3T3, Ml, and DAl, shown by reverse
`transcriptase-polymerase chain
`reaction
`(RT-PCR)
`to contain mCD34 mRNA,
`were also stained by this mAb, indicating
`that 49E8, although specific for a GST(cid:173)
`mCD34 fusion protein, could also recognize
`the native form of mCD34 as expressed on
`various cell types ( 4 ).
`We next examined adult mouse BM for
`expression of mCD34. Four-color fluores(cid:173)
`cence-activated cell sorter (FACS) analysis
`was done after sequential staining of BM cells
`with a combination of lineage-specific mAbs
`to CD4, CDS, B220, Gr-1, Mac-1, and
`TERl 19, and then a mixture of mAbs to c-Kit
`(ACK-2), Ly6A/E (Sca-1), and mCD34 (5).
`
`M. Osawa and H. Nakauchi, Department of Immunology,
`Institute of Basic Medical Sciences and Center for
`Tsukuba Advanced Research Alliance, University of
`Tsukuba, Tsukuba Science-City, lbaraki 305, Japan.
`K.-i. Hanada and H Hamada, Department of Molecular
`Biotherapy, Cancer Chemotherapy Center, Japanese
`Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo 170, Japan.
`
`*Present address: KIRIN Pharmaceutical Research Lab(cid:173)
`oratory, Gunma 371, Japan.
`tTo whom correspondence should be addressed.
`
`Monoclonal antibody 49E8 reacted with
`2.5 ± 0.5% (mean ± SD) of total BM cells,
`with most of the positive cells occurring in the
`Lin- fraction (Fig. lA). More than 90% of
`the c-Kit + Sea 1 + Lin - cells previously
`shown to contain primitive HSCs (6) stained
`brightly with 49E8, whereas the remainder
`were low to negative (Fig. lB). The frequency
`of mCD34 + c-Kit + Sca-1 + Lin - cells and
`mCD34- c-Kit+ Sca-1+ Lin- cells among
`total nucleated BM cells was 0.073 ± 0.028%
`(mean ± SD, n = 5) and 0.004 ± 0.003%
`(mean ± SD, n = 5), respectively.
`To determine whether mouse HSCs ex(cid:173)
`press mCD34, we sorted subpopulations by
`FACS and examined their stem cell activity.
`Within the c-Kit+ Sca-1 + Lin- population,
`the frequency of interleukin-3 (IL-3 )-de(cid:173)
`pendent colony-forming unit culture (CFU(cid:173)
`C) per 200 cells was 20.0 ± 3.9% (mean ±
`SD, n = 8) (7) for mCD34+ cells but only
`0.16 ± 0.4% (mean ± SD, n = 8) in the
`CD34- fraction. Similarly, mCD34+ cells
`contained 14.1 ± 3.4% (mean ± SD, n =
`15) day 12 CFU spleen (CFU-S) per 200
`cells, whereas in the mCD34 - fraction this
`value was 1.6 ± 1.7% (mean± SD, n = 15)
`(8). Thus, colony-forming activity was pos(cid:173)
`itively correlated with mCD34 expression
`among c-Kit+ Sca-1 + Lin- cells. When
`these cells were cultured in the presence of
`both IL-3 and stem cell factor (SCF), how(cid:173)
`ever, 80% of mCD34- c-Kit+ Sca-1 +Lin(cid:173)
`cells formed large multilineage colonies (7).
`For in vivo analyses, c-Kit+ Sca-1 +Lin(cid:173)
`cells were fractionated into mCD3410/- (Fr.
`1), mCD341" (Fr. 2), and c034+ (Fr. 3)
`subpopulations according to their mCD34
`expression by FACS (Fig. 2A). Although
`100 c-Kit+ Sca-1 + Lin- cells were sufficient
`to radioprotect a lethally irradiated mouse,
`injection of 300 cells from either the Fr. 1 or
`Fr. 3 subpopulation {Fig. 2A) alone showed
`poor radioprotective ability (9). When cells
`
`242
`
`SCIENCE
`
`• VOL. 273
`
`• 12 JULY 1996
`
`West-Ward Exhibit 1057
`Choi 1996
`Page 004
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket