throbber
(
`
`(
`
`I
`' I
`I
`
`{
`
`Adult and
`Pediatric
`Urology
`
`THIRD EDITION
`
`EDITORS
`Jny Y. Gillenwater, :\l.D.
`Hovey S. Dabney Professor
`Department of Urology
`University of Virginia l-leruth Sciences Center
`Charlottcsv;lle, Virginia
`John T. Grayhack, M.D.
`Professor
`Dcpa1·trnent of Urology
`Northwestern University Mcd irol School
`Chicago, 1llinois
`
`Stuart S. Howards, M.D.
`Professor
`Department of Urology
`University of Virginia Health Sciences Center
`Charlottesville, Virginia
`
`John W. Duckett, M.D.
`P1·ofossor of Urology
`University of Pennsylvnnin School of Medicine;
`Director, Pediatric Urology
`Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
`Philadelphia, Peonsylvanio
`
`With 16<12 illustmtions
`
`~·A Mosby
`
`Si Lou.s 8.1!bmoro Bostoo c,,1,b.ld Chicago MapleS Htw Yan Ptilladets:hia Porlbnd
`London MaJn!l Max!co Cd., S l'liPPolt S·r.lney
`lokyo Tororao \V1tsbit~en
`
`West-Ward Exhibit 1043
`Jennings & Linehan 1996
`Page 001
`
`

`

`.....,. J\ Ti1nes ;\1irror
`M Cu1np~111y
`
`Publisher: Anne S. Patterson
`Editor: Susie Baxter
`DevelopmcnUil EditOI': 1\nne Gunter
`Projecl Maun.ger: Peggy fo'agen
`
`THIBD EDITTON
`Copyright o 1996 by Mosby- Year Book, Inc.
`
`Previous editions copyrighted 1987, 1991
`
`All rights reserved. No P'trt of this publication may be reproduced,
`stored in a retrieval system, or tnmsmitted, in any form or by any
`means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise,
`without prior written permission from the publisher.
`
`Permission to photocopy or reproduce soleli• for internal or personal
`use is pe rm itted for libraries or other users registe1·ed with lhe Copyright
`Clearance Center, provided that the ba.~e fee of $4. 00 per chapter pl us S.10
`per page is paid clirectli• to the Copi•right Clearance Center, 27 Congress
`Street, Salem, '-'IA 01970. This consent cloes not extend to other kinds of
`copying, such as copying for general distribution, for advertising or
`promotionnl purposes. for creating new collected works, o r for resale.
`
`Printed in the United States of America
`Composition by Graphic World, Inc.
`Project management by Graphic World Publishing Services
`Printing/binding by Maple-Vail Book Manufacturing Croup
`Mosby-Year Book .. lnc.
`11830 Westline lndust..-ial Drive
`St. Louis, Missouri 63146
`
`ISBN: 0-8016-7711-4
`95 96 97 98 99
`
`I 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
`
`West-Ward Exhibit 1043
`Jennings & Linehan 1996
`Page 002
`
`

`

`CHAPTER 15
`
`Renal, Perirenal, and Ureteral Neoplasms
`
`Scott B. Jennings
`W. Marston Linehan
`
`CLASSIFICATION
`Upper urinary tract neoplasms (Table 15-1) nre of
`rennl parenchymal. urothelinl, connective tissue, and
`metastatic origin. Benign renal tumors include nd·
`enomas, oncocytomas, and other tumors derived frorn
`vascular ond connective tissues. Primary malignant
`renal tumors include renal cell carcinomas, urothelinl
`carcinomas of the renal pelvis and collecting system,
`and sn rcomns originating in the kidney. Secondnry ma(cid:173)
`lignant rnnul tumors may involve tlie kidney by direct
`exte nsion or as a result of hematoge nous sp1·end. Ile·
`mnlologic rnalignnncies such as le ukemia and lym(cid:173)
`phoma <.'Ommonly involve the kidney and arc usunlly
`n manifestation of systemic disease. Primary retro·
`peritoneal tumors are usually malignant and include
`lipomns ns well as the various sarcomas. Primary ure·
`teral tumors mny be benign or malignant and include
`fibrocpithelial polyps, inverted papillomas, and the
`more common urothelial malignnncics. The ureters
`may be involved secondarily by direct extension of
`adjacent mnlignancies or, more common ly, from
`blood-bome metastases.
`
`EVALUATION OF RENAL MASSES
`The cvalunlion of renal masses has changed drn·
`mntically with the advent of improved radiologic tech(cid:173)
`niques. Bemuse of tl1e position of the kidney within
`the retro1>eritoneum, in the past renal masses some·
`times rcmnincd undetected until they grew large
`enough lo produce local symptoms. which gencrall)'
`indicated nd"anced disease. Kow, as tlie routine use
`of nlxlominal ultr:L<Onogrnphy (US) 3nd L'<>mputcrizcd
`tomography (C1) has increased, renal masses are oRcn
`detected at an earlier stage. A systematic method is
`necessary to ensure complete evaluation of suspected
`renal mnsscs. as each radiologic modality ha.< its rel(cid:173)
`ative strengths and weaknesses (Fig. 15-1).
`Intravenous pyclography (JVP), despite its luck of
`sensitivity nnd specificity, remains the initial diag11os·
`
`J
`
`tic method employed for the evaluation of suspected
`renal m:lSSes because of its familiarity to physicians
`and its role in the evaluation of hemnturia. An fVP
`can detect many reonl masses and provide information
`regarding the location and function of the kidneys;
`however, small masses that do not distort the coUect·
`ing system or periphery of the kidney may not be
`detected. Also, patie nts with con trust alle rgies, renal
`insufficiency, or other conditions may not be candi(cid:173)
`dates for IVP.
`lf a renal mass is found on !VP, ukrnsonography is
`ollen recommended to determine if the mass is solid
`or cystic. The majority of masses detected by !VP
`prove to be simple cysts, and US is quite accurate in
`this diagnosis. Strict sonogmphic criteria for simple
`cysts have been defined and include a smooth cyst
`wrul, a round or oval shnpe without internal echoes,
`and good through transmission with strong acoustic
`shadows posteriorly (Fig. 15-2). If these criteria arc
`met, observation is sufficient in asymptomatic pa·
`tlents. A mass th.it deviates from these findings is
`studied further. Percutaneous needle puncture of
`cysts with aspiration of cystic !luid for cytology and
`biochemical studies and fi 1rthcr injection of the cyst
`cavity with contrast med ium for rndlogmphic evalu·
`ation were ollen pe1for111cd in the past. However, the
`nppearnnce of cytology of the cyst Ruicl and biochem(cid:173)
`ical assays were frequently nondlngnostic (Bosniak,
`1993) except in the case of simple benign cysts, and
`tl1us with modem sonographic techniques these stud(cid:173)
`ies are rarely necessary. Indeterminate or complex
`cystic m:lSSes are better evaluated with CT.
`Solid renal m:lSSes demonstrate varied echogenicity
`on US, and thus the specificity of this modality is
`limited. Angiomyolipomas are very brightly echogenic
`and may be suspected from US. but rcnnl cell carci(cid:173)
`nomas may mimic this appearance. Other solid renal
`mnsses mny be isoechoic or hypocchoic nnd may be
`
`643
`
`West-Ward Exhibit 1043
`Jennings & Linehan 1996
`Page 003
`
`

`

`644
`
`AOUf,1' UROLOCl'
`
`well demarcated or irregular. Because of the lack of
`speci.flcity, CT is often recommended for solid masses
`seen on US (Fig. 15-3).
`Occasionally, masses seen on JVP are not detected
`by US. This may be due to the presence of an isoechoic
`renal mass, patient habitus, or a nor1nal anato1nic vari·
`ant such as fetal lobulation or a hypertrophied column
`of Bertin. In the past radionuclide renal scanning
`was recommended, based on the principle that nor-
`
`TABLE 15-1
`Classilicatlon ol Renal, Perirenal, and Ureleral Twnors
`Renal tumors
`Benign
`Adenoma
`Oncocytoma
`Angiomyolipoma
`Fibromo
`Leiomyoma
`Ju.iaglOmerular 1um0<s
`Hemangk>ma
`Lipoma
`Primary maUgnant
`Renal cell carcinoma
`Urotl>elial carcinoma
`Sarcoma
`Secondary malignant
`Relroperitoneal sarcoma,
`pancreatic carcinoma.
`co!()n carcinoma (d~ecl
`extension)
`lung, breast, GI
`(hematogenous sp<ead)
`Lymphoma, leukeraa
`
`Primary retroperitoneal tumors
`Benign
`Upoma
`Lelomyoma
`Cysts
`Malignant
`~osarcoma
`Fibrosarcoma
`Lelomyosarooma
`Ureteral tumors
`B<mign
`Papllloma
`Fibroepithelia1 polyps
`Primary malign0S1t
`Urothellal carcinoma
`Sat coma
`Secondary malignam
`Retroperltoneal sarcoma,
`lymphoma, breasl, GI,
`ceNlx, prostate
`
`FIG. 15-1
`Algorilhm for evaluation ol a renal mass.
`
`mal function ing renal tissue is necessar)' to conc-en(cid:173)
`trate commonly used n1dioisotopes (Newhouse, 1993},
`and thus tumors or cysts appear as areas of de(cid:173)
`creased activity, and columns of Bertin are evident as
`areas of increased intensity (Fig. 15-4). However,
`contrast CT seu1s C<lll often readiJ)' make these diag(cid:173)
`noses and [n addition provide much more infonnation
`regarding tumor staging. Thus CT is c<msidered by
`most to be the moda Uty of choice in this situation,
`although nuclear renal scans are still comm only per(cid:173)
`formed.
`CT scanning is the predominant method used today
`in the evaluation of renal masses and has largely re(cid:173)
`placed renal angiogmphy in this regard. The advan(cid:173)
`tages of CT scanni.ng include greater sensitivity in
`detecting small renal masses, imp1-ovcd detection of
`small amounts offilt within tumors, the abi lity to quan(cid:173)
`titate the density of VRrious components, and more
`accurate tumor staging because of improved visual(cid:173)
`ization of the retroperitoneal sb·uctu.res, adj:icent or(cid:173)
`gans, and associated vasculature. In addition , CT scan(cid:173)
`ning is considered less invasive and less expensive
`than arteriography. CT scanning is most often per(cid:173)
`formed with and without oral and intravenous contrast
`administration to fully realize the diagnostic potential
`of this modality (Bosniak, 1993); thin sections (5 mm
`or less} may also be important (Fig. 15-5). In a small
`percentage of patients, CT will not be able to differ(cid:173)
`entiate atypical angiomyolipomas, complex cystic
`masses, and other inAammatory or infectious masses
`from more typical solid tumors, and further evaluation
`\Vith mngoetic resonan<.'e imaging, renal angiography,
`
`IVP
`
`I
`~ Ullm101111d~
`
`Solid or
`
`No Mass
`
`Simple Cyst
`I
`Observe
`
`Com,pl/x - - -
`Nuclear Renal Sct1n
`I
`Pse-ud~tumor
`~CT...............
`~ Observe
`~ /
`Fa1
`Solid
`lnde1erminn1c
`I
`Vascular
`/MRI
`
`Tumor
`I
`Surgery
`
`~ l11C'01l,lusivc ~
`
`/
`/ Aneriogrom
`Vnsculor
`Benign
`I
`I
`Tumor
`Observe
`I
`Surgery
`
`FNA ............
`
`Surgcl)'
`
`~1alignan1
`I
`Surgery
`
`--
`
`West-Ward Exhibit 1043
`Jennings & Linehan 1996
`Page 004
`
`

`

`' -. '
`
`SGS
`
`RE.>1111., PF.RlllEi'IAL, MW URETER.AL NF.OPW\S.\/S
`
`645
`
`'
`
`FIG. 15·2
`Ullrasouncl ol a simple renal cyst showing renal parenchyma
`(short arrows), cysl wall {long arrows), and slrong poslerlor
`wall (arrowheads).
`
`FIG.15-3
`Ultrasound examination ol a solid 1enal mass (arrows).
`
`FIG. 15-4
`Olmercaptosuccinic acid (OMSA) scan of a renal pseudolu·
`mot (hypertrophied column ol Ber11n) shown by arrows.
`
`-
`
`West-Ward Exhibit 1043
`Jennings & Linehan 1996
`Page 005
`
`

`

`646
`
`Aou1.r Unoux;r
`
`AG. 1S-5
`CT of a renal cen carcinoma (RCC) (arrows). A, Without contraS1 enhancement. B, With contrast enhancement (From Wiiliams
`RO, Tanagho EA: Current Surgicel Diagnosis and Treatment. Los Altos, Calif. Lange Medical Pub4ications. 1985, p 860. Used
`by permission.)
`
`fine needle aspiration cytolo1,'Y. or ultimately surgical
`exploration may be necessary.
`In nddition to its role in the evnluation of indeter(cid:173)
`minnte renal masses, renal :trterlography is also useful
`in dellning the blood supply to large tumors, or for
`precise delineation of the rennl vasculnture when
`nephron-sparing surgery is contemplated. Arteriog(cid:173)
`raphy is not without risk, and digital subtraction an(cid:173)
`giography in combination with CT has been proposed
`as an nltemative to decrease morbidity as we ll as give
`acceptable anatomic definition ('Zabbo et al., 1985}.
`Magnetic resonance imaging is an increasingly im(cid:173)
`portant modality in the diagnosis and staging of renal
`masses and offers sign ificant advantages over CT in
`some respects (Fig. 15-6). The teclmiquc Is particu(cid:173)
`larly useful in the evaluation of vascular invasion and
`involvement of adjacent organs. The addition of gado(cid:173)
`linium contrnst administration to MRJ has greatly in(cid:173)
`creased its ability to detect renal masses smllller than
`3 cm, as well as assisted in the diagnosis of true in(cid:173)
`vasion of lbe wall of the venal ca.va (McClennn.o and
`Deyoe. 1994). TI1e evaluation of local adenopathy is
`also impro"ed with MRI (Semcll-3 et al., 1993). ln
`addition, MRJ with gadolinium Is possible in patients
`in whom scanning with ioclinntecl contrast agents is
`contraindicated. At tlie present time MRI is perhaps
`most useful as an adjunct to contrnsl CT scans, partly
`because of greater cost, bul il undoubtedly will play
`a lnrger role in the future.
`
`BENIGN RENAL TUMORS
`Benign tumors of the kidney are common and in
`the past were detected primarily at autopS)'. as the
`majority arc asymptomatic. However, a growing num-
`
`AG. 15-6
`TransaxialT,-welghted MRI of Iha same RCC (arrows) shown
`In Fig. 15·5, A and B. (From Wiiiiams RO, Tanagho EA:
`Current Surgical Diagnosis and Treatment. Los Altos. Calif,
`Lange Medical Publications, 1985, p 860. Used by perrnls·
`slon.)
`
`bcrofthese generally small masses are being detected
`ns the routine use of abdominal sonogrnphy nnd com(cid:173)
`puterized tomography has inc1·eased. Often there are
`no clear-cul clinical or rndiologic features lo CQnfirm
`the diagnosis preoperntivcly, and thus the pathologist
`determines the tnae etiology of these tumors followir>g
`surgery.
`
`Ade no ma
`Renal C<>rtical adenomas are benign tumors that arc
`usually found at autopsy because of their small si7.e
`
`West-Ward Exhibit 1043
`Jennings & Linehan 1996
`Page 006
`
`

`

`R£NJ\t, PEltl/lfNM,, AND URffelv\L Nf:ON .. ~SMS
`
`647
`
`FIG. 15-7
`Histologic section of true renal adenoma (original magnifi(cid:173)
`cation, x 100).
`
`FIG. 15-8
`Histologic section of a benign renal oncocyloma (original
`magnification, x 200).
`
`and gene rally asymptomatic clinical course. They have
`been noted in 7% to 22% of autopsy specimens (Bon(cid:173)
`sib, 1985). Adenomas are usually less than 1 c m in
`size and located exclusively in the cortex, with a dis(cid:173)
`tinctive g1-ay-white or yellow appearance on gross ex·
`amination, without necrosis or hemorrhage (Fromo(cid:173)
`wit-l and Bard, 1990). Histologically they are com(cid:173)
`posed of eosinopb ilic or basophilic cells in a papillary
`or tubu lopapiUary patte rn (Fig. 15-7), typic.~lly sepa(cid:173)
`rate fi-om the surrounding parenchyma and usually
`without a capsule (O'Toole et al., 1993). Any evidence
`of clear cells, mitoses, nuclear pleomorphism, or ne(cid:173)
`crosis obviates the diagnosis of adenoma.
`The e tiology of adenomas is unclear, although they
`have been associated with s moking, arte riolar neph(cid:173)
`rosclerosis, and dialysis (Mosto6 et al., 1988). Histo(cid:173)
`chemical and ultrastructuntl s tudies point to a distal
`tubular origin for adenomas (Fromowitz and Bard,
`1990). Other investigators (Kovacs, 1993) have noted
`the chromosomal changes of trisomy 7, trisomy 17,
`and loss of the Y chromosome. M e loni and colleagues
`(1992) found similar changes in adenomns b ut caution
`that similar or identical changes are found in tumors
`that histologically prove to be renal cell carcinomas.
`Controversy pe rsists in the literatu re regarding the
`true clin ical nahire of these neoplasms. In an earl)'
`autopsy series reported b y Dell (19.50), tumors less
`than 3 cm in size demonstrated a very low rate of
`metastasis, and by conven tio11 renal masses smalle r
`than 3 cm were referred to as adenomas. Howeve1",
`multiple reports, including Bell's original series, cloc(cid:173)
`tunen t me lastases originating from small tumors, and
`thus size a lone is not an accurate predictor of malig(cid:173)
`nancy (Donsib, 1985; C urry ct al., 1986; Fromowitz
`nad Bard, 1990). Bennington and Beckwith (1975) con(cid:173)
`cluded that adenomas could not re liably be differen(cid:173)
`tiated from small aclenocarcinomas. However, oth er
`
`investigators feel that histologio criteria can be used
`to distinguish these two neoplas ms (Bonsib, 1985; Fro(cid:173)
`mowitz and Bard, 1990; Mostofi e t al., 1984; O'Toole
`e t :ti. . 1993). Because it is impossible to differentiate
`adenomas Ii-om carcinomas preoperatively on the basis
`of symptoms, size, or radiographic appeai-ance, small
`solid renal ma.~ses should be conside1·ed to be malig(cid:173)
`nant until pl'oven otherwise.
`
`Oncocytoma
`Renal oncocytomas are benign renal tumors com(cid:173)
`posed of oncocyte.~. a cell population with intensely
`eosinophilic granular cytoplasm . The y were first char(cid:173)
`acte rized as a clinical e ntity by Klein and Vale nsi
`(1976) and accoun t for 3% to 7% of solid renal tumors
`(Lieber, 1993). Grossly, oncocytomas have a typical
`tan or mahogany t'Olor and are well circumscribed with
`a fibrous capsule. invasion into adjacent pare nchyma,
`collecting syste m, or renal capsule is rare. On cross(cid:173)
`section, the tumor appears to he homoge neous with(cid:173)
`out hemorrhage or necrosis. A central stellate scar is
`ofte n present, particularly in la1-ger tumors. Oncocy(cid:173)
`tomas nre generally un ilateral, although approximately
`6% of patients have bi lateral tumors (Lieb er, 1986)
`and isolated cases of multifocal tumors have been re(cid:173)
`ported (Warfel and Eble, 1982). Oncocytomas may
`become quite h rge, with a median diameter of 6 cm
`in collecled series. Oncocytomas are also found in
`multiple other organs, including the thyroid and para(cid:173)
`thyroid glands, the adrenal glands, and the salivary
`glands.
`H islologic,1lly, oncocytomas are composed of large
`polygonal cells with nn intensely eosinophilic granular
`cytoplasm (fig. 15-8). Ultnistructural studies have
`shown that the granularity is clue to abundant mito·
`chi;mclria within the cytoplasm. Mitoses and other cel(cid:173)
`lular organelles ni·e rnl'e, as is nuclear pleomorphism.
`
`West-Ward Exhibit 1043
`Jennings & Linehan 1996
`Page 007
`
`

`

`648
`
`ADULT UROl.OCr
`
`The exact cell of origin is unknown, although recent
`studies suggest an origi11 from the iotercalated cells of
`the collecting ducts (Storkel et al., 1989; Zerbnn et
`al., 1987). Liebe1· ancl associates (1981) pr'Oposed a
`grading system for onc'OC)'toma.~. with grade 1 tumors
`composed of well-differentiated cells with regu lar nu(cid:173)
`clei and abu ndant cytoplasm , grade 2 tumors dem·
`onstrating more variegation of the nuclei a11d cyto(cid:173)
`plasm, and grade 3 tumors degrading juto significant
`nuclear pleomorphism with possible mitotic activity.
`The term oncocytomo s hould be used to refer only to
`those tumors composed of a pure population of on(cid:173)
`cocytes, i.e., very well differentiated eosinophilic
`granular cells. Many renal cell carcinomas also con tain
`granular cells alone or in combination with clear cel ls
`or spindle cells, and on occasion pathologic differen(cid:173)
`tiation of oncocytoma from carcinoma may be difficu lt.
`However, the granular cells found in these carcinomas
`are less well differentiated and demonstrate obvious
`nuclear p leomorphism.
`Clinically, most oncocytomas are asymptomatic, de(cid:173)
`spite their occasional large size. Most tumor< are dis(cid:173)
`covered incidentally, although occasionally patierlts
`present with flank or abdominal pain, microscopic or
`gross hematuria, or a palpable mass. They are ap(cid:173)
`proximately twice as common in males as in females,
`similar to series of renal cell carcinomas. Oncocytomas
`most commonly occur in the early seventh decade,
`somewhat later than re1ial cell carcinomas (Lieber,
`l993).
`Radiologically, oncocytomas appear to be typic'.tl
`solid renal mass lesions. There is no pathognomonic
`finding on intravenous pyelography, renal ultrasonog(cid:173)
`raphy, or comp uted tomography, although a central
`stellatc. scar can be visualized with sonography or to·
`mography in some cases. However, th is finding is non(cid:173)
`specific. \Veiner and Bemstein (1977) noted several
`characteristic findings on renal angiography of onco(cid:173)
`cytomas and used the term "spoke-wheel" to describe
`the appearance of the feeding artelies. These 6 ndings
`are not always present, however, and may also be seen
`in re nal cell carcinomas (Morra and Das, 1993).
`Flow cytometry studies of renal oncocytomas have
`)~elded conllicting data. Rainwater and colleagues
`{1986) found aneuploid or tctraploicl histograms in 50%
`of their specimens. Other investigators have re ported
`aneuploidy or tetraploidy in 0% to 4% of patients
`(Hartwick e t al. , 1992; Psihramis and Golclber·g, 1991;
`Veloso et nl. , 1992). The p revalence of aneuploicly or
`tetraploidy did not correspond with an unfavorable
`clinical course. and thus flow cytome try does not seem
`to be useful as a prognostic indicator. Cytogenetic
`studies also fail to show consistent characteristic ab(cid:173)
`nonnalities (Kovacs, 1993).
`Since true oncocytomas are almost without cxcep·
`tion clinically benign, nephron-sparing surgery has
`
`been proposed in selected cases. This treatment prc(cid:173)
`mmes fill accurate preoperati"e diagnosis, particu larly
`the excl usion of renal cell carcinoma. As pre\fiC>usly
`noted, there are no completely reliable clinical 01· ra(cid:173)
`diographic criteria to distinguish oncocytomas from
`carcinomas. Needle aspiration cytology has been sug(cid:173)
`gested as a diagnostic modality for patients in whom
`oncocytoma is suspected. Rodriguez and associates
`(1980) reported the Srst case of oncocytoma diagnosed
`preoperatively by aspiration cytology, with Anal di(cid:173)
`agnqsis confirmed following total neplueetomy. Othe1·
`small series (Cochand-Priollet et al. , 1988; Carcia(cid:173)
`Bonafe et al., 1993; Gupta et al., 1990) have collRrmed
`the potential usefulness of preoperative aspiration cy(cid:173)
`tology, but in these series cytologic criteria could not
`exclude carcinoma in 20% to 33% of patients. If nepb(cid:173)
`ror1-sparing surgery is contemplated, Rne-needle as(cid:173)
`piration cytology may be helpful, but thorough tumor
`sampling must be performed and results should be
`interpreted with caution, since carcinomas may con(cid:173)
`tain foci of oncocytic cells and appar·ent pure onco(cid:173)
`cytomns may harbor small areas of malignant degen(cid:173)
`eration. Also, the possibility of multifocal tumors must
`be considered. If the diagnosis of oncocytoma can he
`unequivocall)• established prior to surgery, a nephron(cid:173)
`sparingapproach may be indicated. However, because
`of the inherent uncertainties in current preoperative
`diagnostic modalities, most patients with oncocytoma
`utimately undergo racLcal nephrectomy.
`
`Anglomyolipoma
`Renal angiomyolipomas are benign tumo1·s ofien
`associated with tuberous sclerosis, nn autosomal dom(cid:173)
`inantly inherited disorder characterized by mental re(cid:173)
`tardation, epilepsy, adenoma seba~-emn, and hamar·
`tomas of the brain, retina, heart, bone, lung, and
`kidney (Stillwell et al., 1987). As many as 80% of pn(cid:173)
`tients with tuberous sclerosis will ultimately develop
`renal angiomyolipomas, and in these patients the tu·
`mors are·generally small, bilateral, and asymptomatic.
`Renal cysts also common ly occur in patients with tu(cid:173)
`berous sclerosis. The majority of renal angiomyoli(cid:173)
`pomas are not associated with tuberous sclerosis. 1n
`recent series only 17% to 20% of patients with an·
`giomyolipomas also demonstrated evidence of tuber(cid:173)
`ous sclerosis, and thus it does not seem like!)' that
`isolated renal angiomyolipoma represents a forme
`fruste of tuberous sclerosis (Bret et al., 1985; Steiner
`et al., 1993). ln these patients the tumors are unilal·
`era!, usually oecur in women 40 to 60 years of age,
`and are often large and symptomatic.
`Angiornyolipomas nre composecl of generally m:i(cid:173)
`ture fat cells, smooth muscle, and abnorm<tl blood
`vessels. Sometimes one cell type may predominate.
`C rossly. the tumors are yellow to gray, depe11ding on
`the proportion of fat nnd muscle ~-ells. 11iey a1·e unen-
`
`West-Ward Exhibit 1043
`Jennings & Linehan 1996
`Page 008
`
`

`

`RENAL. P£R/l!E:/\'M., AND UllETEMI. N~:OPU.SlJS
`
`649
`
`capsulated 3lld may extend into t11e collecting syste m
`or perirenal fat. Hemorrhage nnd necrosi.'l nre com(cid:173)
`mon . Histologicnlly, the adipocytcs are usually mature
`nnd regular in size (Fig. LS-9). The blood vessels nre
`thick-walled and tortuous. The smooth muscle cells
`mny be spal'se or may form sheets of cells that muy
`be confused with leiomyoma (MostoR and Davis,
`1984). Retroperi toneal lymph nodes and adjacent or·
`gnns such as the liver or spleen may sometimes contain
`nngiomyolipomas identical to the renal tumor, and this
`Is felt to represent multifoeallty rather than aggressive
`metastatic behavior, as no distant metastases have
`been reported from pure nngiomyolipomas. However,
`malignant degeneration of nngiomyolipoma into snr·
`coma with d istan t metastiL•cs has been reported (Ferry
`et nl., 1991; Lowe et nl., 1992), and in these instances
`the outcome was fatal. Angiomyolipomas and rcnnl cell
`
`FIG. 15-9
`Hlstologic: section or a renal anglomyolipoma showing typlc:at
`lat (short arrows), muscle (loog arrows), and vessels (arrow(cid:173)
`heads) (original magnification, x 63.)
`
`carcinomas may also coexi.'lt in the same kidney (Kn·
`vnney and Fielding, 1975; Schujman et al., 1981; Tak·
`cyamn et al., 1982; Silpannntn et al., 1984).
`The clinical prescntntion of angiomyolipomM is
`vuriable and appears to he related to the size of the
`tumor. Steiner and associates (1993) found thnl no
`pt1tle nt with a tumor less thnn 4 cm in si1.e was sym1>·
`tomntic. Tumors larger Lhan 4 cm in size are symp(cid:173)
`tomatic in 46% to 82% of cases (Oesterling et al. , 1986:
`Steiner et al., 1993). Flank or abdominal pain is the
`most common presenting symptom, occurring in ap(cid:173)
`proximately 50% of patients, followed by p.-tlpable
`mass and hemnturia. Hypertension and anemia nre
`also common. Patients mny also present in hemor·
`rhngic shock following rupture of the tumor into the
`kidney or retrope ritoneum.
`Bnd lographic studies arc usually he lpful in the di·
`agnosis of angiomyolipomn. Intravenous pyclography
`cannot dilTere ntiate angiomyolipoma from other solid
`renal lesions, and the nngiographic findings typically
`seen are also common in renal cell carcinoma. How·
`ever. ultrasonogrnphy and CT scanning can reliably
`define angiomyolipomn in the majority of cases. An·
`glomyolipomas are the most echogenic renal masses
`found on sonogrnphy duu to the numerous fat-nonfat
`interfoces seen in most tumors (Pitts et al. , 1980).
`O the r renal musses nrc, however, occasionally highly
`cchogenic, includ ing a smoll proportion of rennl cell
`carcinomas. The presence offal densities(- 70 lo - 30
`Hounsfield units) on CT scanning is almost pathogno·
`monic for angiomyolipoma (Fig. 15-10). Detection of
`small amounts of fat within the tumor may therefore
`be critical for diagnosis , nnd such detection may be
`improved by using noncnhnnced scans with LS to 5·
`mm sections (Bosnink ct nl ., 1988; Kurosaki et ul.,
`l993). Magn etic resonance lmnging may also be useful
`
`B
`
`FIG. 15·10
`CT of a renal angiomyolipoma. A , Typical mass le51on with internal areas of fat (arrows). B, Same lesions as In A showing
`abundant lat (arrows).
`
`West-Ward Exhibit 1043
`Jennings & Linehan 1996
`Page 009
`
`

`

`650
`
`ADULT UROLOCl'
`
`because or the characteristic higb signal intensity of
`fat on T,-weighted imogcs. All these diagnostic mo·
`dalities are dependent upon the relative proportion of
`fat within the tumor. and thus a small number of cases
`will remain of uncertain etiology following complete
`radiologic evaluation. Fine-needle aspiration biopsy
`has been recommended in such instances with good
`results (Snnt et al. , 1990: Toavitsainen ct nl., 1989).
`The treatment of angiomyolipoma is dependent
`upon the size of the tumor, the presence of symptoms.
`:wd the accuracy of diagnosis (Andriole, 199'2). Small,
`asymptomatic tumors discovered incidentally may be
`followed with )'Carli• sonography if the diagnosis is
`unequivocnl. Asymptomatic patients with tumors
`larger than 4 c m may still ho candidates for observation
`with :mnunl or semiannual ultrasound, but nenrly 50%
`of these tumors will grow (Steiner et al .. 1993). Tumor
`embolizMion or nepbron-sparing surgery should then
`be considered to pre"cnt further loss of renal paren·
`chyma. Symptomatic pntionts usunlly requin: treat·
`menl, regard less of the size of the muss. Embolizalion
`or parlinJ nephrectomy arc the preferred modes of
`therapy, although totnl nephrectomy will be indicated
`in some cases. Patients who present with life-threat(cid:173)
`ening hemorrhage should undergo immedinte surgical
`exploration. Radic.,l ocphrectomy is the trcntment of
`choic'<l, although partinl nephrectomy 1nai• be t'Onsid·
`ered if the clinic.,J situation allows and if angiomyoli·
`poma is suspected preopcmtively and confirmed by
`intraopcmtive frozen-section biopsy. Finally, patients
`io whom the mdiologic diagnosis is uncerlllin should
`undergo flne·needle aspiration biopsy or surgical ex·
`ploralion, ns for any other solid re mtl mnss.
`
`Other Benign Tumors
`Tumors ha"e been reported to arise from virtual!>'
`all of tl1e diverse cell types of which the kidney is
`composed. Medul.lary interstitial fibromas nre small
`benign tumo1·s commonly found at autopsy, occurring
`in 18% to 40% of patients (Reis e t al.. 1988; Warfel
`and Eble. 1985). As the name implies, these tumors
`arise from the interstitial cells nf the renal medulla
`which are belie"ed to cau.se an antil1ypertensive effect
`(Lerman et al., 1972). However, no convincing e\'i·
`dence exists that interstilinl fibromas arise as n resu lt
`of hypertension (Stuart ct nl., 1976). The tumors are
`genemlly small, white or gray in color, and round or
`oval in shn1>e. The majority are multifocal. They occur
`in males and females \\1th equal frequency (Eble,
`1990) and arise as early as the second decnde of life
`without increasing signiftcu11tly in frequenc)' with ad·
`vanccd age (Reis et al., 1988). H.istologicnlly, the tu·
`mors arc composed of stellate or spindle-shaped cells
`loosely arranged in a basophilic or hyalini1.ed matrix,
`with atrophic renal tubules nt the periphery. :.tost of
`these tumors are clinically silent, although occasion·
`
`ally they may cause flank or abdominal pain or he·
`maturin. The few symptomatic cases have genernll)'
`been h'eated with nephrectomy, although ncphron·
`sparing surgery should be considered if the diagnosis
`Is suspected preoperatively.
`Leiomyomas are rare benign tumors found in n1)·
`proximately 5% of patients undergoing autopsy (Xi·
`pell , 1971). They nrc almostalwnys small, subcapsular,
`and n.•ymptomatic. The occurrence of multiple tumors
`Is common. These tumors arise from the renal capsule,
`"essels, or, rarely, the renal pelvis. Leiomromas are
`gray or white in color, usually sm:iller than 1 to 2 cm,
`nnd usually well encapsulated (DI Palma and Giardini,
`1988). Histologicnll y they are composed of fusiform
`smooth muscle cells ttrranged in an interlaced fashion.
`Mitotic 6gures are rare or absent. A much smaller
`subset of patients present with large, solitary, symp·
`tomatic tumors. A palpable abdominal or Hank mass
`is the most common sign at presentntion, followed by
`nbclominal or Annk pain and he mnturia (S teiner cl nl.,
`1990). Clinically apparent leiomyomas arc more co111-
`mon in young white women. Total nephrectomy is
`usually performed because of the uncertainty of di·
`ngnosis, but renal-sp.1ring surgery is advocated if tech·
`nicnlly feasible and if the diagnosis can be conRm1ed
`lntrnoperatively.
`Ronin-secreting juxtaglomcntlar cell tumors arc
`mre but important benign renal masses, with fewer
`thnn ·10 cases reported in the literature. Patients with
`these tumors present with severe diastolic h;"j>Crten·
`sion, hypoJ..-nlemin, and ele"atcd plasma renin levels.
`Typically, patients :ire yow1g (70% under 25 years of
`age) 11nd 66% nre female (McVlcnr ct al. , 1993). Head(cid:173)
`ache is the most common presenting symptom. The
`diagnosis is usually suspected from the finding of hy·
`pcrtension in a young patient and is confirmed by
`elevated renin levels and secondary hyperaldoster·
`onism and hypolmlemia, :ilthough these secondary
`findings are not always present. Compute rized to·
`111ography is the most reliable imaging method to dem·
`onstmte these tumors. Renal angiography is some·
`times useful, primarily
`to exclude renovascular
`hypertension. Selective renal vein rcnin sampling may
`nlso be helpful , although this is diagnostic in fewer
`th1111 50% of cases (McVica1· el al., 1993). Crossly, the
`tumors are gener;1lly smaller thnn 3 cm, grayish-ye!·
`low in color. and well encapsulated. Histologically,
`they originate from the smooth muscle medial cells of
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket