throbber

`
`,
`ESO
`European School of Oncology
`EACR
`
`
`
`
`
`ECC_C_) 11
`
`the European
`Cancer
`
`Conference
`
`‘C.
`
`.___..__—""‘*J:“‘"—"'We
`
`The Ofi‘iciaijoumoi of
`
`EORTC
`
`European Organization for
`Research and Treatment of Cancer
`
`European Association for
`Cancer Research
`
`FECS
`
`Federation of European
`Cancer Societies
`
`EUSOMA
`
`European Society of Mastology
`
`West-Ward Exhibit 1031
`Boni 2001
`
`Page 001
`
`West-Ward Exhibit 1031
`Boni 2001
`Page 001
`
`

`

`S68
`
`Monday
`
`22 October
`
`2001
`
`surgery
`
`for MoPBC,
`
`T, Ndemethyi
`circulating
`studied
`the Study: We prospectively
`Aim of
`and 4-OH-T)
`that
`to be
`(D-T, DD-T
`T, N-dedimethyl
`T and Chydroxy
`T
`steroid
`hormone
`binding
`matched
`with
`lipids,
`coagulation,
`blood counts,
`globulin
`(SHBG),
`various
`hormones,
`vaginal
`katyopyknotic
`index
`(KPI)
`(our
`previous
`studies
`BMJ
`ii: 1351-2,
`1977; Cytopatol
`9: 263-270,
`1998) and
`transvaginal
`ecosonography
`endometrial morphology.
`Patients
`were 85, consecutively
`enrolled after
`radical
`and given adjuvant
`T 20 mg/day
`for 5 years.
`effects within 2 w.s
`Results:
`T induces most of
`its agonist
`estrogen-like
`therapy.
`A steady
`state of
`the biological
`events
`is reached
`in about 4 w.s
`and persists
`up
`to 60 mo.s. Cholesterol,
`LDL-C,
`HDL-C,
`LDL-CiHDL-C
`ratio, apolipopmtein
`B/apolipoprotein
`A ratio,
`fibrinogen
`and antithmmbin
`Ill activitv
`droooed
`from 2 w.s
`to 60 mo.s. HDL-C was unchanged.
`SHBG
`and KPl~incr&ed
`early, while FSH, LH and prolactin
`decreased.
`A late
`rise of Hb, PCV occurred
`from
`the
`lSti mo. Platelets were
`lower
`from
`the
`4”’ w (all quoted
`results:
`p 5 0.005).
`Plasma
`concentration
`of T and
`its
`metabolites
`shows
`interpersonal
`variations;
`the steady
`state was
`reached
`at the 4@’ w. Positive
`relations
`(p 5 0.005)
`existed
`between
`4-OH-T
`and
`fibrinogen
`and KPI,
`inverse
`relation
`between
`4-OH-T
`and antithrombin
`Ill,
`D-T and
`fibrinogen,
`DD-T and
`fibrinogen.
`Agonistic
`properties
`are mainly
`exerted
`by the
`three metabolites.
`Further
`analyses
`is ongoing.
`In praise
`of GOCNE
`(Giuppo
`Onwlogiw
`Cooperativo
`Nor&Est),
`Aviano
`(PN).
`Italy This
`investigatibn
`is part of the study pmgrama
`partia//y
`supported
`by AOI-Asaociazione
`Onwlogica
`Italiana, Aviano
`/ta/y
`
`CR0
`of and
`(PN),
`
`240
`POSTER
`two different
`using
`(PK) of irofulven
`Pharmacokinetics
`intermittent
`dosing schedules as a 90’minute
`(MN)
`infusion
`in advanced
`solfd
`tumors
`(AST): Preliminary
`data
`F. Lokiec’,
`E. Raymond2,
`J. Alexandre3,
`E. Brain’, M. Ould Kaci4,
`f Center
`S. Lagree4,
`S. Smith’,
`K. Vanderbilt’,
`E. Cvitkovic4,
`J.L. Misseta.
`Rent? Huguenin,
`Saint-Cloud;
`21nstitut Gustave-Rouss)$
`Wilejui~ 3 H6pital
`Paul Brouase,
`Viliejuif 4 CAC, Kremlin-B&We,
`France;
`5MGl Pharma,
`Minnesota.
`USA
`
`promis-
`analog of illudin S, has shown
`an acyifulvene
`Irofulven,
`Purpose:
`during
`preclinicaUdinical
`development,
`with delayed
`ing anti-tumor
`activity
`thrombocytopenia,
`severe
`asthenia
`and nausea/vomiting
`as treatment-lim-
`iting toxicities
`(tox). PK analysis
`of the 5 min daily x 5 or intermittent
`weekly
`dosing
`q3 or 4w schedules
`(sch)
`has shown
`a short mean plasma
`half-life
`(t1/2)
`range:
`4-8 min, with a
`large
`interpatient
`(pt) variability.
`A 30 min
`administration
`dot-responds
`to approtimately
`5 tl12. Therefore,
`by the end
`of a 30 min
`infusion,
`a steadystate
`will be reached. Within
`the ongdng
`Phase
`I study, we decided
`to use
`the 30 min
`infusion
`to improve
`the PK and
`phhrmacodynamic
`(PD) analyses
`and
`to
`investigate
`a possible
`corralatfon
`between
`observed
`tox and Cmax.
`(sch)
`schedules
`the same
`with
`treated
`,Mefhods:
`Pts with AST were
`previously
`explore&with
`the 5 min
`infusion
`duration
`I@: Di, 8, q3w and
`C: Di,
`15 q4ti)
`using
`the
`following
`dosing
`levels
`(DL
`in [mgYir?/d]).
`Sch
`B: Di2[78j;
`DL3
`[Zfi
`Sch C: Dl2
`[24], DL3
`[28j. During each pt’s
`first 3
`infusions,
`10 plasnia
`samples
`were
`collected
`up to 5 ,hours
`post-infusion.
`As of 04/2001
`I24 @s were
`included
`in Dl2 and DL3 of both sch,
`&sults:
`PK analysis
`has been performed
`for day 1 in the
`first 17 pts.
`Total body clearance
`appeared
`stable up to 28 m.
`
`DOSS
`ms/m2
`16
`21
`24
`26
`
`Sch
`W
`B(M)
`B(DL3)
`cm.3
`C (DL3)
`
`N
`eval. pts
`7
`2
`7
`1
`
`max
`rig/ml
`112*56
`115f4
`202 i 161
`214
`
`AUC
`ng/mlxh
`36.8 * 16.1
`35.9 * 1.4
`66.7 i 61.6
`70.3
`
`Cl~W8IlCCi
`Vh/m2
`566 * 279
`586123
`532 * 293
`396
`
`T,n beta
`‘min
`7.1 h 3.6
`1.9fO.l
`6.5 + 6.6
`4.7
`
`total bodv clear-
`that AUCs and
`show
`results
`Preliminarv
`Conclusions:
`is administered
`as a 5 or a 30-minute
`antes
`are similar when
`irofulven
`half-life.
`Fully updated’ PK analysis
`and
`infusion,
`despite
`its short
`terminal
`the PWPD
`relationships
`will be presented.
`
`Poster Sessions
`
`POSTER
`(GEM)
`between gemcitabine
`interactions
`(VNR) in patients wtth advanced stage solid
`
`241
`Pharmacokinetic
`and vlnorelbine
`tumors
`M. Airoldi’,
`L. Catte12.
`2 University
`
`S. Marchionatti’,
`E. Buffa2, MC. Veriengo’,
`S. Novello2,
`A.S. Hospital, Medical Oncology,
`Turin,
`Italy;
`’ S.Giovanni
`of Turin, Postgtaduate
`School
`in Clinical Pharmacy;
`Turin,
`
`Italy
`
`in patients with
`GEM and VNR are both active as single agents
`Purpose:
`stage of solid
`tumors.
`Because
`of their different mechanism
`of
`advanced
`action,
`good
`tolerability
`and
`feasible
`administration
`on an outpatient
`basis
`they should be an interesting
`combination
`for palliative
`chemotherapy.
`The
`aim of
`this
`study
`is
`to determine
`possible
`pharmacokinetic
`interactions
`between GEM and VNR.
`lung cancer
`non small cell
`Methods:
`A total of 11 patients with advanced
`or metastatic
`breast
`cancer weie
`treated with GEM
`(1 h i.v. infusion,
`1000
`mg/m2)
`followed
`by VNR
`(10 min
`i.v. slow bolus,
`15 mg/m2)
`on days ~1,
`8, every
`3 weeks;
`5 patients
`received
`single-agent
`GEM
`(lh
`i.v.
`infusion,
`1000 mg/m2)
`as a control
`group. GEM and VNR were measured
`in blo0d
`samples
`taken
`at several
`time points
`after
`the starting
`of treatment
`and
`immediately
`added with enzymatic
`inhibitor
`of deaminase
`THU.
`Plasma
`levels were quantified
`by
`liquid extraction
`followed
`by HPLC analysis
`and,
`pharmacukinetic
`data were processed
`by KineticaTM
`1 .l computer
`program
`Results? In
`the
`schedule
`GEM+VNR
`average
`Cmax
`of GEM was
`26278f4671
`@ml,
`AUC=20305f3111
`@ml/h,
`Utot=75,48+14,56
`vh,
`11/2alfa=5.1~5,3
`minJ1/2beta=18.2f3.4
`min. Thesteadv
`state was
`reached
`about
`30
`.min after &e beginning
`of administration;
`&ax
`of VNR was
`8131387
`rig/ml, AlJC=224+75
`w/ml/h,
`Cltot=192,74f72.51
`l/h; Cmax of
`single-age&
`GEM was 29295f5681
`@ml,
`AUC=24327&7346
`nq/ml/h,
`Cltot=75,20&17,78
`I/?I, t1/2alfa=3,0f5,1
`min,
`t1/2beta=20,0f5,2
`min.
`Conclusions:
`Cmax, AUC and Cl values of GEM
`followed
`by VNR agreed
`with
`the values
`shown
`in monotherapy;
`Cprt curve
`for GEM
`in combination
`was best describti
`by a biphasical model with a rapid distribution
`and elimi-
`nation. Cpii curve
`for VNR showed
`rapid distribution; moreover,
`interpatient
`variability
`was
`important
`for all parameters
`in accordance
`to the
`literature
`data;
`these prelimirlaty
`data have shown
`that
`treatment
`with GEM+VNR
`do
`not alter
`the pharmacokinetic
`behaviour
`of both drugs
`compared
`with single
`agent
`therapy.
`Further
`investigation
`is needed
`to
`relate pharmacokinetic
`data
`to toxicity
`of the treatment.
`
`of 5-fluorouracil
`the pharmawkinetics
`in ‘combination
`to patients with advanced
`
`(5-FU)
`solid
`
`and
`tu-
`
`POSTER
`
`In
`doses of Ccl-779
`and leucovorln
`In patients
`
`242
`of escalating
`Pharmacokinetics
`combination
`with 5-fluorouracil
`with advanced
`soli+
`tumors
`J Bon?
`J. Korth<Bradley’,
`C.J.A. Punt2, A. Hanauske3,
`is
`Research,
`K. Weigang-KBhleti,
`C. Thielert5,
`J. Frtsch5.
`’ weth-Aye&
`Clinical Pharmawkinetics,
`Radnor, PA, USA; 2 University Medical Center
`Nvmegen,
`The Netherlands;
`3 Onkologische
`Tagesklinik, Munich,
`Germany;
`4 Klinikum Nuemberg,
`Nuernberg,
`Gennany;
`5 Wyeth Onwlm
`Munich, Germany
`Purpose: To evaluate
`Ccl-779,
`administered
`mors.
`cycle. Dur-
`of a 7-week
`6 weeks
`spanned
`treatment
`Weekly
`Methods:
`infusion
`of
`cycle,
`a 1 hour
`intravenous
`(IV)
`treatment
`ing day 1 of each
`infusion
`200 mg/m2
`leuwvorfn
`(LV) was
`followed
`by a 24 hour continuous
`of 2600 mgIm2
`5-FU.
`Starting
`on cyclel/day
`8, 15
`to 75 mg/m2
`of
`IV
`Ccl-779
`preceded
`LV&FU
`treatment.
`Concentrations
`of 5-FU were mea-
`sured
`throughout
`the 24 hour
`infusion
`p@qd
`in cycle
`l/weeks
`1, 2 and
`4; Ccl-779
`and
`its prima@ mqtabdiite
`siiolimus
`(rapamycin)
`were
`followed
`for 8 days during
`cycle
`l/weeks
`i and 4. Parameters
`were derived
`using
`nonwmparlmental
`methods.
`Results: For 15 patients, mean&SD
`plasma mcen-
`5-R)
`steady-state
`and 666f248
`ng/mL
`tratfon was 667XZ.X
`ng/mL
`(Week
`1 without Ccl-779)
`(Week
`2’with Ccl-779);
`mean clearance
`(CL) was 326+113
`Uh
`(Week
`2).
`For 13 patients, mean Ccl.779
`CL
`increased
`with
`increasing
`dose’(13
`L/h
`[low dose]
`to 41
`I&I
`[highest’dose]
`(CV 5 30%). Mean half-life was 17&4
`hours.
`The mean
`ratio of Sirglimtis-to-CCI-779
`AUC was 2.4
`to 3.8. No
`period effects wemobserved.
`did
`regimen
`CFURV
`in the standard
`of 0X-779
`Condusioq:
`Inclusion
`not ‘affect 5-FU phatmawkinetlc
`disposition,
`nor did 5-FU change Ccl-779
`phannswkinetic
`parameters.
`
`West-Ward Exhibit 1031
`Boni 2001
`Page 002
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket