throbber
Page 001
`
`West-Ward Exhibit 1098
`Kondo 2001
`
`West-Ward Exhibit 1098
`Kondo 2001
`Page 001
`
`

`

`Int. J. Cancer: 91, 219–224 (2001)
`© 2001 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
`PTEN/MMAC1/TEP1 MUTATIONS IN HUMAN PRIMARY RENAL-CELL
`CARCINOMAS AND RENAL CARCINOMA CELL LINES
`Kei-ichi KONDO1, Masahiro YAO1*, Kazuki KOBAYASHI1, Shinsuke OTA1, Minoru YOSHIDA1, Shigeki KANEKO1, Masaya BABA1,
`Naoki SAKAI1, Takeshi KISHIDA1, Satoshi KAWAKAMI1, Hiroji UEMURA1, Yoji NAGASHIMA2, Yukio NAKATANI3 and Masahiko HOSAKA1
`1Department of Urology, Yokohama City University School of Medicine, Yokohama, Japan
`22nd Department of Pathology, Yokohama City University School of Medicine, Yokohama, Japan
`3Pathology Section, Yokohama City University Hospital, Yokohama, Japan
`
`Publication of the International Union Against Cancer
`
`Extensive allelotyping studies have implicated several tu-
`mor-suppressor loci on chromosomes 3p, 5q, 6q, 8p, 9pq,
`10q, 11q, 14q, 17p, 18q and 19p in human kidney tumorigen-
`esis. The PTEN (also called MMAC1 and TEP1) gene, a candi-
`date tumor suppressor located at chromosome 10q23.3, is
`mutated in a variety of sporadic malignancies as well as in
`patients with Cowden disease. To investigate the potential
`role of the PTEN gene in renal tumorigenesis, we searched
`for abnormalities of the gene in 68 primary renal-cell carci-
`nomas (RCCs) as well as in 17 renal carcinoma– derived cell
`lines, using DNA-SSCP, sequencing and microsatellite anal-
`ysis. Five of 68 (7.5%) primary RCCs exhibited intragenic
`mutations (3 missense, 1 deletion and 1 splice-site), and 1 of
`17 (5.9%) cell lines had an insertion mutation. Loss of het-
`erozygosity of the PTEN gene occurred in 25% of primary
`RCCs, including the 3 cases with intragenic mutation and the
`1 PTEN-mutated cell line. Clinical and histopathological ex-
`aminations revealed that 4 of the 5 primary tumors with
`PTEN mutation were high-grade, advanced clear-cell RCCs
`with distant metastases or renal vein tumor invasions, result-
`ing in poor prognostic courses. The other was a low-stage
`papillary/chromophilic RCC. Our data suggest that PTEN
`mutation is observed in a subset of RCCs and that, especially
`in clear-cell RCCs, it occurs as a late-stage event and may
`contribute to the invasive and/or metastatic tumor pheno-
`type.
`© 2001 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
`Key words: PTEN/MMAC1/TEP1 gene; tumor suppressor; mutation;
`carcinoma; renal cell; cell line
`
`Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is the most common malignant
`neoplasm in the adult kidney. Cytogenetic and molecular genetic
`studies have demonstrated that several cancer-associated genes,
`including oncogenes and tumor-suppressor genes, are involved in
`the development and progression of human neoplasms.1 Regarding
`the molecular pathogenesis of RCC, chromosome 3p loss has been
`observed in most clear-cell RCCs, and the von Hippel-Lindau
`(VHL) disease tumor-suppressor gene, located at 3p25, has been
`shown to be mutated and inactivated frequently in this tumor
`subtype.2,3
`In addition to the VHL gene, extensive allelotyping studies have
`implicated several other tumor-suppressor loci on chromosomes
`5q, 6q, 8p, 9pq, 10q, 11q, 14q, 17p, 18q and 19p in human kidney
`tumorigenesis.4 – 6 A putative tumor-suppressor gene, PTEN (phos-
`phatase and tensin homologue deleted on chromosome 10) also
`called MMAC1 (mutated in multiple advanced cancers-1) and
`TEP1 (TGF-␤–regulated and epithelial cell–enriched phospha-
`tase),
`located at chromosome 10q23.3, has been identified.7–9
`Somatic mutation of the PTEN gene has been found in a variety of
`sporadic tumors,
`including gliomas, melanomas and prostate,
`breast and endometrial carcinomas.7,8,10 –13 Moreover, germ-line
`mutation of the gene was identified in Cowden/Bannayan-Riley-
`Ruvalcaba syndrome, an autosomal-dominantly inherited multiple
`hamartoma syndrome with a high risk of breast and thyroid car-
`cinomas.14,15 The PTEN gene product is a dual-specificity phos-
`phatase with sequence homology to the cytoskeletal protein tensin;
`it suppresses the growth, apoptosis and migration of cells through
`negatively regulating the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/Akt signal-
`ing pathway.16 –19
`
`Although somatic PTEN mutation in renal carcinomas has been
`reported,8,20,21 the detailed mutational status of the gene in spo-
`radic RCC has not been well characterized. To further investigate
`the potential role of PTEN in human renal tumorigenesis, we
`searched for abnormalities of the gene in primary sporadic RCCs
`as well as in RCC-derived cell lines.
`
`MATERIAL AND METHODS
`
`Tissue samples
`Sixty-eight primary sporadic RCCs and matched normal kidney
`tissues were obtained from patients during surgery at Yokohama
`City University Hospital and its affiliated hospitals. All specimens
`were frozen rapidly with liquid nitrogen and stored at –80°C until
`nucleic acid extraction. Tumors were confirmed to be sporadic
`according to medical records. Tumor stage was determined ac-
`cording to the TNM classification. A system of 3 nuclear grades
`(G1,
`low-grade; G2,
`intermediate-grade; G3, high-grade) was
`used, according to the General Rule for Clinical and Pathological
`Studies on Renal Cell Carcinoma.22
`Cell lines
`Human renal carcinoma–derived cell lines included SGE-RC,
`VH-Renal, VMRC-RCW, VMRC-PCZ, SN12C, KC12, MTS-RC,
`KWA-RC, OUR10, OUR20, YCR-1, A498, CAKI1, SMKT-R2,
`SMKT-R3, ACHN and NSK-RC. Cell lines were maintained in
`Ham’s F12 or DMEM with 10% FBS.
`DNA-SSCP and sequencing analysis
`High m.w. genomic DNA was prepared by a proteinase K/phe-
`nol chloroform extraction method.23 We used PCR primer sets for
`DNA-SSCP analysis for all 9 exons and exon–intron boundaries of
`the PTEN gene, as described previously.8 The PCR conditions in
`each primer set were essentially as described previously8 with
`[␣-35S]dATP added to the reaction. Following 40 cycles of PCR
`amplification, products were denatured, electrophoresed on MDE
`gel (FMC Bioproducts, Rockland, ME), dried and exposed to
`X-ray films at room temperature overnight. When aberrant SSCP
`patterns were detected, PCR-SSCP was repeated with both tumor
`and normal corresponding kidney samples, to confirm the results.
`PCR products were purified using the Wizard PCR-Prep kit (Pro-
`mega, Madison, WI) and directly sequenced, or sequencing was
`performed after the product was cloned into the pCR2.1 vector,
`using a TA cloning kit (Invitrogen, La Jolla, CA). Sequencing was
`
`Grant sponsor: Ministry of Education, Science, Sports and Culture
`(Japan); Grant number: 10671488.
`
`*Correspondence to: Department of Urology, Yokohama City Univer-
`sity School of Medicine, 3-9 Fukuura, Kanazawa-ku, Yokohama 236-0004,
`Japan. Fax: ⫹81-45-786-5775. E-mail: masayao@med.yokohama-cu.ac.jp
`
`Received 17 March 2000; Revised 13 September 2000; Accepted 18
`September 2000
`
`West-Ward Exhibit 1098
`Kondo 2001
`Page 002
`
`

`

`220
`
`KONDO ET AL.
`
`performed using a Thermo Sequenase radiolabeled terminator cy-
`cle sequence kit (Amersham, Arlington Heights, IL) according to
`the manufacturer’s protocol. Following the sequence reaction,
`these products were electrophoresed on 6% polyacrylamide gels.
`Gels were dried and exposed to radiographic films for 1 day.
`RNA extraction, RT-PCR and cDNA sequencing
`Total RNA was isolated from primary RCCs and corresponding
`normal tissues by a guanidine thiocyanate extraction method.24
`Total RNA was treated with DNase I to avoid contamination of the
`DNA from PTEN pseudogene.25 First-strand cDNA was then
`synthesized using a reverse transcription system (Promega) ac-
`cording to the manufacturer’s protocol. For RT-PCR amplification
`of the PTEN fragment from exons 1 to 4, PCR primers (forward
`5⬘-ATG ACA GCC ATC ATC AAA GAG-3⬘, reverse 5⬘-AGG
`ATA TTG TGC AAC TCT GCA-3⬘) were used with the following
`conditions: denaturation at 95°C for 10 min; then 30 sec at 95°C,
`30 sec at 55°C and 30 sec at 72°C for 40 cycles; then 5 min at
`72°C. Following amplification, PCR products were evaluated on
`1.5% ethidium bromide–stained agarose gels, purified using the
`QIA quick Gel Extraction (Qiagen, Chatsworth, CA), cloned into
`the pCR2.1 vector and sequenced using the same protocol de-
`scribed above.
`LOH detection by PCR-microsatellite analysis
`Two microsatellite markers, D10S215 and D10S541, both
`flanking the PTEN gene, were used for determining the allelic
`imbalance of the gene.26 Another polymorphic dinucleotide-repeat
`marker, PTENCA, which contains the 5⬘ end of the gene, was also
`used for loss of heterozygosity (LOH) analysis.27 PCR conditions
`were essentially as described previously with [␣-32P]dATP added
`to the reaction.26,27 Following amplification for 20 cycles, products
`were electrophoresed through denaturing 6% polyacrylamide gels,
`dried and exposed to X-ray films at –80°C overnight. Each allelic
`intensity was measured with a Hewlett-Packard (Palo Alto, CA)
`Scan Jet digital scanner with NIH image software (version 1.55)
`for determining LOH status.
`
`RESULTS
`We screened 68 primary sporadic RCCs and matched normal
`kidney samples as well as 17 renal carcinoma–derived cell lines
`for PTEN mutations throughout all exons and exon–intron bound-
`aries using DNA-SSCP and sequencing analysis. Sixty-eight pri-
`mary RCCs consisted of 54 clear-cell and 7 papillary/chromophilic
`carcinomas, 6 sarcomatoid variants and 1 chromophobic carci-
`noma.
`
`Five primary RCCs, tumors 27, 68, 86, 263 and 333, and 1 cell
`line, OUR20, showed aberrant mobility shifts on DNA-SSCP
`analysis for exons 2, 5, 3, 3, 8 and 8, respectively (Fig. 1).
`Sequencing studies revealed that tumor 27 had a T-to-C transition
`at nucleotide (nt.) 158, and it made an amino acid change (valine
`to histidine) at codon 53. In tumor 68, a C-to-G transversion was
`found at nt. 303, and it made an amino acid change (isoleucine to
`methionine) at codon 101. In tumor 263, a T-to-C transition was
`found at nt. 202, and it made an amino acid change (tyrosine to
`histidine) at codon 68. In tumor 333, a 1 bpdeletion at nt. 968 (968
`delA) was identified. In OUR20, a 1 bpinsertion at nt. 1005 (1005
`insA) was found (Fig. 2). The presence of a single mutant allele in
`both SSCP and direct sequencing of PCR products in OUR20
`indicated that the wild-type PTEN allele is lost in this cell line.
`In tumor 86, a G-to-C transversion 5 bp from the splice donor
`site of intron 3 was found, and we suspected that it made a splice
`variant. It is typical for nucleotide changes involving splice-junc-
`tion sequences to produce a variety of splice variants together with
`a normally spliced message.28 To look for splice aberrations in this
`tumor, we reverse-transcribed mRNAs, amplified the cDNA and
`sequenced the fragments. RT-PCR and sequencing analysis re-
`vealed that tumor 86 exhibited at least 2 aberrant-sized transcripts;
`one was an abundant longer message with abnormal 52 bp se-
`quences between exons 3 and 4, and the other was a shorter, faint
`message due to the absence of all of exon 3 (Fig. 3). In addition to
`these aberrant messages, we detected a normally spliced PTEN
`transcript by RT-PCR. Unfortunately, we could not determine
`whether this normal message was derived from tumor cells with a
`splice-site mutation since we analyzed mRNAs from fresh tumor
`specimens usually containing some amount of non-cancerous cells.
`Histopathological and clinical data revealed that 4 of the 5
`primary tumors displaying PTEN mutation were high-grade, ad-
`vanced clear-cell RCCs with distant metastasis (cases 68 and 86)
`or renal vein tumor invasion (cases 263 and 333) at the time of
`nephrectomy. All 4 patients subsequently died of multiple meta-
`static lesions within 3, 3, 48 and 22 months, respectively (Table I).
`In contrast, the fifth PTEN-mutated tumor (case 27) was a papil-
`lary/chromophilic RCC with T1bN0M0G1 staging and good prog-
`nosis (Table I).
`Exons 7 and 8 of the PTEN gene contain an A(6) repeat, and it
`has been shown that these mononucleotide repeats are targets for
`mutations in replication error-positive colorectal carcinomas.29
`However, we did not find any change in these 2 A(6) repeats in our
`tumors or cell lines.
`During mutational analysis of the PTEN gene, we identified 2
`sequence polymorphisms, both of which had been reported by
`
`FIGURE 1 – DNA-SSCP analysis of the PTEN gene. Primary RCCs 27, 68, 86, 263 and 333 and the OUR20 cell line showed aberrant mobility
`shifts in exons 2, 5, 3, 3, 8 and 8, respectively. Aberrant bands (arrows) were observed only in renal carcinoma (C) or the OUR20 cell line (CL)
`but not in normal corresponding or control kidney samples (N).
`
`West-Ward Exhibit 1098
`Kondo 2001
`Page 003
`
`

`

`PTEN MUTATION IN HUMAN RENAL CARCINOMA
`
`221
`
`FIGURE 2 – Sequence analysis of the PTEN gene, demonstrating that tumor 27 had a T-to-C transition at nt. 158, tumor 68 had a C-to-G
`transversion at nt. 303, tumor 86 had a G-to-C transversion 5 bp from the splice donor site of intron 3 [nt. position 209(⫹5)], tumor 263 had
`a T-to-C transition at nt. 202, tumor 333 had an A deletion at nt. 968 and renal-carcinoma cell line OUR20 showed an A insertion at nt. 1005.
`N, corresponding normal kidney; C, renal-carcinoma sample.
`
`others.27,30 One was a C/G variant 9 bp from the splice donor site
`of the 5⬘ side of exon 1 with allelic frequencies of 0.97 (C) and
`0.03 (G). The other was a T/G variant 32 bp from the splice donor
`site of intron 8 with allelic frequencies of 0.43 (T) and 0.57 (G) in
`our panel of Japanese patients.
`We next examined primary RCCs for LOH status at the PTEN
`locus using 3 highly polymorphic dinucleotide-repeat markers,
`D10S215, D10S541 and PTENCA. LOH at the PTEN locus was
`found in 14 (25%) of 57 informative cases. Three of the 5 primary
`RCCs with intragenic mutation (tumors 86, 263 and 333) also
`showed LOH at this locus (Fig. 4), which means that the PTEN
`gene was completely inactivated in a “2-hit” manner in these
`tumors. We did not detect any aberrant patterns exhibiting micro-
`satellite instability (MSI) for these 3 dinucleotide-repeat markers
`in the 68 fresh tumors analyzed.
`
`DISCUSSION
`In the current study, we examined the mutational status of the
`PTEN1/MMAC1/TEP1 gene in primary RCCs as well as in renal-
`carcinoma cell lines and found somatic PTEN mutations in 5 of 68
`(7.5%) primary tumor specimens and 1 of 17 (5.9%) cell lines. The
`PTEN gene was completely inactivated in 3 of the 5 primary
`tumors and in 1 cell line by “2-hit” mechanisms.31 Histopatholog-
`
`ical and clinical data revealed that 4 of the 5 primary tumors with
`PTEN mutation were high-grade, advanced clear-cell RCCs with
`poor prognosis.
`In sporadic gliomas, PTEN mutation was observed exclu-
`sively in high-grade, high-stage tumors.11 Loss of PTEN ex-
`pression was associated with tumor progression and poor prog-
`nosis in these malignancies.32 Moreover, functional analysis
`demonstrated that wild-type PTEN can inhibit cell spreading
`and motility by suppressing both the focal adhesion kinase and
`the mitogen-activated protein kinase pathways, while mutated
`PTEN that had lost these functions enhanced the spreading and
`migration of tumor cells.16,33 Our data suggested that PTEN
`inactivation also occurs as a late-stage event in the tumorigen-
`esis of clear-cell RCCs and may contribute to the invasive
`and/or metastatic tumor phenotype.
`In contrast, the fifth PTEN-mutated tumor (case 27) was a
`relatively early-stage,
`low-grade papillary/chromophilic carci-
`noma. The patient is alive without tumor recurrence more than 11
`years after surgery. This subtype of RCC is morphologically and
`genetically distinct from clear-cell RCCs.34 –36 Indeed, we have
`previously analyzed tumor samples in the present series for so-
`matic VHL mutations. Three clear-cell RCCs with PTEN mutations
`(tumors 86, 263 and 333) also showed somatic VHL mutations,
`while tumor 27 had no VHL mutation3 (data not shown). These
`
`West-Ward Exhibit 1098
`Kondo 2001
`Page 004
`
`

`

`222
`
`KONDO ET AL.
`
`FIGURE 3 – Results of RT-PCR analysis of PTEN transcripts and schematic illustration of aberrant splicing identified in primary RCC. RT-PCR
`of PTEN exons 1–4 in renal tumor sample 86 (No. 86) showed 2 aberrant-sized transcripts together with a normal-sized transcript identical to
`that in a normal corresponding kidney sample (Control). Sequencing analysis revealed that the longer transcript contained 52 bp aberrant
`insertions between exons 3 and 4, the shorter band lost all of exon 3 and a normal-sized transcript had normally spliced cDNA sequences. Marker,
`100 bp DNA ladder (GIBCO-BRL, Gaithersburg, MD) was used as a size marker.
`
`Mutation
`
`Exon/intron
`
`Consequence
`
`LOH1
`
`Histopathology
`
`TNM2
`
`Grade3
`
`Outcome (months)4
`
`TABLE I – SUMMARY OF PTEN MUTATIONS IN PRIMARY RENAL-CELL CARCINOMAS AND RENAL-CARCINOMA CELL LINES
`Renal
`vein
`invasion
`(⫺)
`
`Tumor/
`cell line
`
`27
`
`Exon 2
`
`NI
`
`T1bN0M0
`
`G1
`
`Alive, NED (133)
`
`158T3C
`Val53 Gly
`Papillary/
`chromophilic
`303C3G
`Ile101 Met
`Exon 5
`68
`Dead of disease (3)
`G3
`(⫺)
`T3aN2M1
`Clear/compact
`No
`209 (⫹5)G3C
`Dead of disease (3)
`G3
`(⫺)
`T3aN0M1
`Clear/compact
`Yes
`Splice mutation
`Intron 3
`86
`202T3C
`Tyr68 His
`Dead of disease (48)
`G3
`(⫹)
`T3bN0M0
`Clear/compact
`Yes
`Exon 3
`263
`Dead of disease (22)
`G3
`(⫹)
`T3bN0M0
`Clear/compact
`Yes
`Frameshift
`Exon 8
`968 delA
`333
`—
`—
`—
`—
`—
`Yes
`Frameshift
`Exon 8
`OUR20 1005 insA
`1NI, not informative.–2TNM classification.–3Nuclear grading system: G1, low grade; G2, intermediate grade; G3, high grade.–4Survival
`months were calculated from the date of surgery. NED, no evidence of disease.
`
`mutational data suggested that clear-cell and papillary/chro-
`mophilic RCCs have different tumorigenic pathways and that
`PTEN may play distinct roles in these 2 subtypes of RCC.
`PTEN was frequently mutated in endometrial carcinomas with
`MSI, suggesting that this gene might be one of the mutational
`targets for a mismatch repair defect.13,37 MSI has been observed in
`only a small fraction of sporadic RCCs.6,38 Indeed, most of the
`tumor specimens in the present series were the subject of previous
`studies, including VHL mutations and MSI status, and we have
`found infrequent MSI in these RCC tumors.38 In the current
`analysis, again, we did not find any aberration of the 2 A(6) repeats
`in the PTEN coding, which have been shown to be targets in
`replication error (RER)-positive colorectal cancers,29 nor did we
`find MSI in 3 dinucleotide-repeat markers in our 68 RCC samples.
`The MSI/RER⫹ phenotype, therefore, appears to be rare, and there
`is no observable correlation between PTEN mutation and MSI in
`sporadic RCCs.
`Somatic PTEN mutation was originally found in 1 of 6 primary
`RCCs by Steck et al..8 Then, Sakurada et al.39 and Cairns et al.40
`reported no PTEN mutations out of 24 and 15 RCC samples
`analyzed, respectively. Alimov et al.20 found somatic PTEN inac-
`
`tivation in 3 of 54 (5.6%) primary RCCs and 1 of 9 (11%) RCC
`cell lines. In this study, we identified somatic PTEN mutation in
`primary RCCs and renal-carcinoma cell lines at a relatively low
`incidence (7.5% in primary tumor samples and 5.9% in RCC cell
`lines). Based on these findings, we conclude that PTEN alteration
`is likely to be involved in a subset of RCCs; nevertheless, our data
`suggest that inactivation of this tumor-suppressor gene occurred as
`a late-stage event and may be associated with invasive and meta-
`static tumor phenotypes in some clear-cell RCCs. Further detailed
`analysis including mutational detection and functional study will
`be needed to evaluate the importance of the PTEN gene in human
`kidney tumorigenesis.
`
`ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
`We thank Drs. I. Kondo and T. Miura of the Kanagawa Cancer
`Center Hospital, M. Moriyama of the Yokohama City Municipal
`Hospital, H. Fukuoka of the Yokohama Minami Kyousai Hospital
`and K. Kitami of the Kokusai Shinzen Hospital for providing
`kidney tissue samples. We also thank Ms. R. Shimizu, Ms. Y.
`Nakamura and Ms. M. Ishii for excellent technical assistance.
`
`West-Ward Exhibit 1098
`Kondo 2001
`Page 005
`
`

`

`PTEN MUTATION IN HUMAN RENAL CARCINOMA
`
`223
`
`FIGURE 4 – Dinucleotide repeat analysis of uncultured tumor DNA. LOH analysis for selected cases and markers is shown. Arrows, lost alleles;
`N, corresponding normal kidney DNA; C, renal-carcinoma DNA.
`
`3.
`
`6.
`
`REFERENCES
`cells by adenovirus-mediated MMAC1/PTEN gene transfer. Cancer
`1. Kinzler KW, Vogelstein B. Lessons from hereditary colorectal cancer.
`Res 1998;58:23312334.
`Cell 1996;87:159–170.
`19. Tamura M, Gu J, Takino T, Yamada KM. Tumor suppressor PTEN
`2. Gnarra JR, Tory K, Weng Y, Schmidt L, Wei MH, Li H, et al.
`Mutations of the VHL tumour suppressor gene in renal carcinoma. Nat
`inhibition of cell invasion, migration, and growth: differential in-
`volvement of focal adhesion kinase and p130Cas. Cancer Res 1999;
`Genet 1994;7:85–90.
`59:442–449.
`Shuin T, Kondo K, Torigoe S, Kishida T, Kubota Y, Hosaka M, et al.
`20. Alimov A, Li C, Gizatullin R, Fredricksson V, Sundelin B, Klein G,
`Frequent somatic mutations and loss of heterozygosity of the von
`et al. Somatic mutation and homozygous deletion of PTEN/MMAC1
`Hippel-Lindau tumor suppressor gene in primary human renal cell
`gene of 10q23 in renal cell carcinoma. Anticancer Res 1999;19:3841–
`carcinomas. Cancer Res 1994;54:2852–2855.
`3846.
`4. Morita R, Ishikawa J, Tsutsumi M, Hikiji K, Tsukada Y, Kamidono S,
`21. Gesk S, Siebert R, Wacker HH, Nurnberg N, Harder L, Lehman J, et
`et al. Allelotype of renal cell carcinoma. Cancer Res 1991a;51:820–
`al. Lack of deletions of the PTEN/MMAC1 and MXI1 loci in renal
`823.
`cell carcinoma by interphase cytogenetics. Cancer Genet Cytogenet
`5. Morita R, Saito S, Ishikawa J, Ogawa O, Yoshida O, Yamakawa K, et
`2000;118:87–88.
`al. Common regions of deletion on chromosomes 5q, 6q, and 10q in
`22. Japanese Urological Association, Japanese Society of Pathology and
`renal cell carcinoma. Cancer Res 1991b;51:5817–5820.
`Japan Radiological Society. General rule for clinical and pathological
`Thrash-Bingham CA, Greenberg RE, Howard S, Bruzel A, Bremer M,
`studies on renal cell carcinoma, 3rd edition. Tokyo: Kanehara, 1999.
`Goll A, et al. Comprehensive allelotyping of human renal cell carci-
`23. Sambrook J, Fritsch EF, Maniatis T, Molecular cloning: a laboratory
`nomas using microsatellite DNA probes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
`manual, 2nd edition. Cold Spring Harbor, NY: Cold Spring Harbor
`1995;92:2854–2858.
`Li J, Yen C, Liaw D, Podsypanina K, Bose S, Wang SI, et al. PTEN,
`Laboratory Press, 1989.
`24. Chomczynski P, Sacchi N. Single-step method of RNA isolation by
`a putative protein tyrosine phosphatase gene mutated in human brain,
`acid guanidinium thiocyanate-phenol-chloroform extraction. Anal
`breast, and prostate cancer. Science 1997;275:1943–1947.
`Biochem 1987;162:156–159.
`Steck PA, Pershouse MA, Jasser SA, Yung WK, Lin H, Ligon AH, et
`25. Teng DH, Hu R, Lin H, Davis T, Iliev D, Frye C, et al. MMAC1/PTEN
`al. Identification of a candidate tumour suppressor gene, MMAC1, at
`mutations in primary tumor specimens and tumor cell lines. Cancer
`chromosome 10q23.3 that is mutated in multiple advanced cancers.
`Res 1997;57:5221–5225.
`Nat Genet 1997;15:356–362.
`26. Dib C, Faure S, Fizames C, Samson D, Drouot N, Vignal A, et al. A
`Li DM, Sun H. TEP1, encoded by a candidate tumor suppressor locus,
`comprehensive genetic map of the human genome based on 5,264
`is a novel protein tyrosine phosphatase regulated by transforming
`microsatellites. Nature 1996;380:152–154.
`growth factor beta. Cancer Res 1997;57:2124–2129.
`27. Wang SI, Puc J, Li J, Bruce JN, Cairns P, Sidransky D, et al. Somatic
`10. Guldberg P, thor Straten P, Birck A, Ahrenkiel V, Kirkin AF, Zeuthen
`mutations of PTEN in glioblastoma multiforme. Cancer Res 1997;57:
`J. Disruption of the MMAC1/PTEN gene by deletion or mutation is a
`4183–4186.
`frequent event in malignant melanoma. Cancer Res 1997;57:3660–
`28. Krawczak M, Reiss J, Cooper DN. The mutational spectrum of single
`3663.
`base-pair substitutions in mRNA splice junctions of human genes:
`11. Rasheed BK, Stenzel TT, McLendon RE, Parsons R, Friedman AH,
`Friedman HS, et al. PTEN gene mutations are seen in high-grade but
`causes and consequences. Hum Genet 1992;90:41–54.
`29. Guanti G, Resta N, Simone C, Cariola F, Demma I, Fiorente P, et al.
`not in low-grade gliomas. Cancer Res 1997;57:4187–4190.
`Involvement of PTEN mutations in the genetic pathways of colorectal
`12. Cairns P, Okami K, Halachmi S, Halachmi N, Esteller M, Herman JG,
`et al. Frequent inactivation of PTEN/MMAC1 in primary prostate
`cancerogenesis. Hum Mol Genet 2000;9:283–287.
`cancer. Cancer Res 1997;57:4997–5000.
`30. Ueda K, Nishijima M, Inui H, Watatani M, Yayoi E, Okamura J, et al.
`13. Kong D, Suzuki A, Zou TT, Sakurada A, Kemp LW, Wakatsuki S, et
`Infrequent mutations in the PTEN/MMAC1 gene among primary
`al. PTEN1 is frequently mutated in primary endometrial carcinomas.
`breast cancers. Jpn J Cancer Res 1998;89:17–21.
`Nat Genet 1997;17:143–144.
`31. Knudson AG. Antioncogenes and human cancer 1993. Proc Natl Acad
`14. Liaw D, Marsh DJ, Li J, Dahia PL, Wang SI, Zheng Z, et al. Germline
`Sci USA 1996;90:10914–10921.
`mutations of the PTEN gene in Cowden disease, an inherited breast
`32. Sano T, Lin H, Chen X, Langford LA, Koul D, Bondy ML, et al.
`and thyroid cancer syndrome. Nat Genet 1997;16:64–67.
`Differential expression of MMAC/PTEN in glioblastoma multiforme:
`15. Marsh DJ, Dahia PL, Zheng Z, Liaw D, Parsons R, Gorlin RJ, et al.
`relationship to localization and prognosis. Cancer Res 1999;59:1820–
`Germline mutations in PTEN are present in Bannayan-Zonana syn-
`1824.
`drome. Nat Genet 1997;16:333–334.
`33. Gu J, Tamura M, Pankov R, Danen EH, Takino T, Matsumoto K, et
`16. Tamura M, Gu J, Matsumoto K, Aota S, Parsons R, Yamada KM.
`al. Shc and FAK differentially regulate cell motility and directionality
`Inhibition of cell migration, spreading, and focal adhesions by tumor
`modulated by PTEN. J Cell Biol 1999;146:389–403.
`suppressor PTEN. Science 1998;280:1614–1617.
`34. Schmidt L, Duh FM, Chen F, Kishida T, Glenn G, Choyke P, et al.
`17. Stambolic V, Suzuki A, de la Pompa JL, Brothers GM, Mirtsos C,
`Germline and somatic mutations in the tyrosine kinase domain of the
`Sasaki T, et al. Negative regulation of PKB/Akt-dependent cell sur-
`MET proto-oncogene in papillary renal carcinomas. Nat Genet 1997;
`vival by the tumor suppressor PTEN. Cell 1998;95:29–39.
`16:68–73.
`18. Cheney IW, Johnson DE, Vaillancourt MT, Avanzini J, Morimoto A,
`Inoue K, Karashima T, Chikazawa M, Iiyama T, Yoshikawa C,
`Demers GW, et al. Suppression of tumorigenicity of glioblastoma
`Furihata M, et al. Overexpression of c-met proto-oncogene associated
`
`7.
`
`8.
`
`9.
`
`35.
`
`West-Ward Exhibit 1098
`Kondo 2001
`Page 006
`
`

`

`224
`
`KONDO ET AL.
`
`with chromophilic renal cell carcinoma with papillary growth. Vir-
`chows Arch 1998;433:511–515.
`36. Yang ZQ, Yoshida MA, Fukuda Y, Kurihara N, Nakamura Y, In-
`azawa J. Molecular cytogenetic analysis of 17 renal cancer cell lines:
`increased copy number at 5q31-33 in cell lines from nonpapillary
`carcinomas. Jpn J Cancer Res 2000;91:156–163.
`37. Tashiro H, Blazes MS, Wu R, Cho KR, Bose S, Wang SI, et al.
`Mutations in PTEN are frequent in endometrial carcinoma but rare in
`other common gynecological malignancies. Cancer Res 1997;57:3935–
`3940.
`
`38. Kobayashi K, Kondo K, Ikeda I, Kaneko S, Sakai N, Yoshida M, et
`al. Microsatellite instability occurs infrequently in sporadic renal cell
`carcinoma. Oncol Rep 1997;4:941–944.
`39. Sakurada A, Suzuki A, Sato M, Yamakawa H, Orikasa K, Uyeno S,
`et al. Infrequent genetic alterations of the PTEN/MMAC1 gene in
`Japanese patients with primary cancers of the breast, lung, pancreas,
`kidney, and ovary. Jpn J Cancer Res 1997;88:1025–1028.
`40. Cairns P, Evron E, Okami K, Halachmi N, Esteller M, Herman JG, et
`al. Point mutation and homozygous deletion of PTEN/MMAC1 in
`primary bladder cancers. Oncogene 1998;16:3215–3218.
`
`West-Ward Exhibit 1098
`Kondo 2001
`Page 007
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket