throbber
(cid:40)(cid:91)(cid:75)(cid:76)(cid:69)(cid:76)(cid:87)(cid:3)200(cid:24)(cid:3)
`
`

`

`ADVANCES IN
`
`
`
`ANTICALCIFIC AND
`
`ANTI DEGENERATIVE
`
`
`
`TREATMENT OF HEART
`
`VALVE BIOPROSTHESES
`
`Proceedings of the Fourth Scientific Meeting
`
`
`
`of the International Association
`
`for Cardiac Biological Implants
`
`EDITED BY _______
`
`_
`
`Shlomo Gabbay, M.D.
`
`Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery
`
`
`
`
`UMDNJ-New Jersey Medical School
`
`Newark, NJ
`
`David J. Wheatley, M.D.
`
`
`
`Department of Cardiac Surgery
`
`University of Glasgow
`
`Glasgow, Scotland
`
`Water Techs. Corp. v. Biomedical Device Consultants & Labs
`IPR2018-00498
`Ex. 2005
`
`Page 1 of 18
`
`

`

`ADVANCES IN ANTICALCIFIC AND
`
`
`
`ANTIDEGENERATIVE TREATMENT OF HEART
`
`VALVE BIOPROSTHESES
`
`Meeting
`Proceedings of the Fourth Scientific
`
`
`of the International Association
`
`for Cardiac Biological Implants
`
`
`
`Held in Washington, D.C. on May 4, 1997
`
`© 1997.
`Copyright
`
`All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, elec­
`
`
`
`
`
`
`tronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the
`
`
`
`
`
`prior written permission of the International Association for Cardiac Bio­
`
`
`
`
`logical Implants or Silent Partners, Inc.
`
`
`
`Printed in the United States of America.
`
`
`
`ISBN 1-878353-42-X
`
`
`
`Published by
`
`Silent Partners, Inc.
`872 7 Shoal Creek Blvd.
`
`USA Austin, TX 78757-6815
`
`Telephone: 512-458-n91
`FAX: 512-458-1234
`E-mail:
`
`publish@silentpartners.com
`www.silentpartners.com
`Web site:
`J018199
`
`Page 2 of 18
`
`

`

`Advances in Anticalcific and Antidegenerative
`
`
`
`
`
`Treatment of Heart Valve Bioprostheses, First Edition,
`
`
`
`edited by Shlomo Gabbay, M.D., David J. Wheatley, M.D.
`
`
`
`Silent Partners, Inc., Austin© 1997
`
`CHAPTER 3
`
`BIAXIAL MECHANICAL BEHAVIOR OF
`
`
`
`B10PROSTHET1c HEART VALVE Cusps
`
`
`SUBJECTED TO ACCELERATED TESTING
`
`M.S. Sacks, K.L. Billiar
`
`
`Engineering Department of Biomedical
`
`
`University of Miami
`Coral Gables, Florida
`
`
`Abstract
`
`bioprosthetic behavior loading The effects of in vivo cyclic on the mechanical of porcine
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`poor related to their continued heart valves are largely unknown, and ore undoubtedly
`
`
`
`
`
`long-term durability. To elucidate the mechanisms that eventually produce failure in por­
`
`
`
`
`
`biaxial mechanical cine bioprosthetic tension-controlled heart valves, tests were performed
`
`
`
`cycles of accel­on the cuspal tissue following 0, 1.4, 5.7, 10.1, 50, 100, and 200 million
`
`
`
`
`
`the changes to estimate constitutive model was employed erated testing. A microstructural
`
`
`
`
`
`fibers. in the effective mechanical behavior of the collagen Under o 60-N/m equibiaxial
`
`
`
`was found, with no tension state, a trend toward increasing circumferential extensibility
`
`
`
`
`model Simulations trend in the corresponding radial extension. using the microstructural
`
`demonstrated that slight
`
`
`
`test axes can misalignments with respect to the biaxial
`specimen
`
`
`
`in the measured extensibilities. potentially cause large variations When the model was
`
`
`
`valve, cycle fatigued used to fit representative data from a nonfatigued and a 200 million
`
`
`
`
`
`the effective fiber stiffness For the fatigued specimen was markedly lower than the nonfatigued
`
`
`
`
`studies revealed delominations but no evidence of damage to the
`
`specimen. Histologic
`
`
`
`
`
`structural level. fiber structure, suggesting that tissue damage occurs on a subfibril
`collagen
`
`
`
`
`
`
`weakening of produces cyclic loading Overall, imply that long-term our results a gradual
`
`
`
`
`
`
`the collagen fiber network, potentially facilitating calcification and ultimately valve failure.
`
`Introduction
`
`Although bioprosthetic heart valves remain a popular choice for heart valve re­
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`placement, they continue to suffer from limited long-term durability. The mecha­
`
`nisms of valve material degeneration, especially when related to calcification, are
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1 In vivo structural deterioration of porcine aortic valve
`not well understood.
`
`
`
`foR CORRESPONDENCE OR REPRINTS:
`
`Michael Sacks, Ph.D.
`
`
`
`
`Department of Biomedical Engineering
`
`University of Miami
`P.O. Box 248294
`
`Coral Gables, Fl 33124-0621
`Tel: 1 305 284 5434
`
`Fax: 1 305 2 84 64 94
`E -mail: msacks@coeds.eng.miaml.edu
`
`Page 3 of 18
`
`

`

`
`
`Biaxial Mechanical Behavior
`
`
`
`Biaxial Mechanical Behavior
`
`The purpose of the present study was to examine the effects of cyclic loading of
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`intact porcine aortic valve bioprostheses. Any valve that undergoes prolonged
`
`
`
`
`
`
`accelerated testing will eventually fail. We hypothesize that gradual cycle-depen­
`
`
`
`
`dent changes in the properties of a tissue valve will occur due solely to the me­
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`chanical loading. Long-term fatigue of intact porcine aortic bioprostheses up to
`
`
`
`
`
`200 X 106 cycles (equivalent to approximately 5.4 years at 70 beats/min) was
`
`
`
`
`
`
`studied to develop a better understanding of the initial mechanisms that eventu­
`
`ally lead to fatigue failure of porcine aortic valves.
`
`
`
`Materials and Methods
`
`
`
`SPECIMEN PREPARATION
`
`Porcine bioprosthetic heart valves were prepared by chemical fixation in 0.625%
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`glutaraldehyde under 0.5 kPa (4 mmHg) differential pressure (forcing leaflets to
`
`
`
`
`
`
`coapt) and provided by St. Jude Medical (St. Paul, MN). The intact valves were
`
`
`
`
`
`
`subjected to standard accelerating testing protocols for O (noncycled), 1.4, 5.7,
`
`
`
`
`10.1, 50, and 200 million cycles. The fixed valves were mounted in silastic con­
`
`
`
`
`
`duits to simulate the aortic root, and subjected to standard accelerated testing
`
`
`
`
`used for Food and Drug Administration approval in sterile saline at a rate of
`
`
`
`
`
`approximately 1000 cycles/min (16 Hz). After cycling, the valves were stored in
`
`at 4°C and sent to our laboratory in their mounts. All
`0.625% glutaraldehyde
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`valves were fully functional and without visual evidence of tearing or perforation.
`
`
`
`
`
`Before testing, the cusps were carefully excised from the valves using microscissors.
`
`
`
`
`At least eight cusps from each accelerated testing level were mechanically tested.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`All biaxial experiments were performed in isotonic (0.9% wt/wt) saline at room
`(20°C-25°C).
`temperature
`
`
`
`BIAXIAL TESTING
`
`One square specimen was cut from the center of each leaflet with the edges aligned
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`to the circumferential and radial directions (Fig. 1). The specimen sizes ranged
`
`
`
`from 10 to 16 mm on each side depending upon valve annular diameter, which
`
`ranged from 20 to 28 mm. Four small graphite markers (75-150 µm) were af­
`
`
`
`
`fixed to the ventricular surface with low-viscosity cyanoacrylate adhesive
`
`
`
`
`
`(Permabond International, Englewood, NJ). A 2.5-mm intermarker spacing was
`
`
`
`used in most cases. Thus the central measurement area was less than 10% of the
`
`total leaflet area in all specimens.
`
`While the specimen was floating unconstrained in the saline bath, the reference
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`marker positions (gauge lengths) were recorded with a CCD camera. The strain
`
`
`
`
`resolution was approximately 0.5% with the typical marker spacing of 200 pix­
`
`
`
`els. Two loops of nylon suture of equal length were attached to each side of the
`
`
`
`
`
`specimen with four stainless steel surgical staples (one staple at each end of each
`
`
`
`
`loop). This procedure was completed in saline on a lab bench away from the
`
`
`
`
`
`biaxial testing device to minimize tissue deformation.
`
`bioprostheses (PBHVs) is strongly time-dependent, with complication rates in­
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1'2 Mechanical deformation, es­
`
`
`creasing rapidly after 10 years postimplantation,
`
` Although the bio­
`
`
`
`
`pecially in bending, is believed to potentiate mineralization,
`
`
`
`
`chemical aspects of mineralization and valve deterioration have been studied ex­
`
`
`
`
`5·7 little work has been completed on the effects of purely mechanical
`tensively,
`
`
`
`
`cyclic loading of chemically treated valve tissue.
`
`3•5
`
`8
`
`At present, "adequate" fatigue life of an intact valve is validated by accelerated
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`testing. In this procedure, the PBHV is cycled at 15 to 20 times the normal heart
`
`
`
`
`
`rate in a pulsatile flow loop using sterile saline as the working fluid. The load
`
`
`
`
`
`
`magnitude and loading pattern are believed to adequately simulate the in vivo
`
`
`
`
`
`environment, with failure patterns generally similar to those found in pathologi­
`
`
`
`
`
`cal studies of explanted tissue. In general, the study of failure of bioprosthetic
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`valves requires an understanding of the gradual mechanical changes leading up to
`
`
`
`
`
`complete valve failure. A study of the subfailure mechanical properties and their
`
`
`
`
`
`progression with time (number of opening and closing cycles) is needed to estab­
`
`
`
`
`
`lish a quantitative representation of the fatigue process in tissue valves and to
`
`
`
`
`
`elucidate the predominant mechanisms and mechanical factors involved.
`Broom8·10 completed a series of studies on the effects of combined uniaxial ten­
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`sion and flexure on circumferential strips of glutaraldehyde-treated bovine and
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`porcine mitral and porcine aortic valves. The circumferential tissue strips stiff­
`
`and the stiffening ened markedly with as few as 2.3 X 106 cycles,
`
`
`progressed with
`
`
`
`8 Collagen disruption was observed in areas of pro­
`
`
`increased numbers of cycles.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`nounced flexure by 300 X 106 cycles. In porcine mitral leaflet tissue, collagen
`
`
`
`
`disruption increased with the number of cycles and became extensive by 500 X
`106 cycles.
`
`
`
`
`9 Low pressure fixed porcine aortic valves (PAVs) (<l mmHg) sus­
`
`
`
`
`
`
`tained little damage, whereas high pressure fixed valves (100 mmHg) demon­
`
`
`
`
`
`
`strate damage similar to the mitral valve tissue. A cycle-dependent reduction in
`
`
`
`
`the native collagen fiber crimp was found in all but the high pressure fixed valves,
`
`
`
`in which the crimp pattern was already lost during fixation.
`
`These uniaxial studies provide the only information on the effects of repeated
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`mechanical loading of heart valve tissue found in the literature. Tests on thin
`
`
`
`
`
`tissue strips, however, cannot mimic the heterogeneous deformation fields and
`
`
`
`
`
`combined loading sequences found in the physiologic environment. In addition,
`
`
`
`
`
`the collagen fiber architecture is disrupted in uniaxial specimens and the com­
`
`
`
`
`plex interactions between the axes are lost. Accelerated testing of intact valves
`
`
`
`
`preserves the 2-dimensional fiber network. Although the local loading is depen­
`
`
`
`
`dent upon the individual valve geometry and testing apparatus and cannot be
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`directly measured, the cuspal stresses more closely resemble the complex patterns
`
`
`
`
`experienced in vivo. Materials tests performed on the cusps following predeter­
`
`
`
`
`
`
`mined accelerated testing intervals could provide a measure of the changes of the
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`valve tissue subjected to realistic purely mechanical loading patterns as a function
`
`
`
`
`
`
`of time. However, the gains of intact fatigue cycling, such as the preservation of
`
`
`
`
`
`
`the mechanics of the intact valve tissue, are not preserved unless multiaxial test­
`
`
`
`
`ing is performed to assess the mechanical property changes.
`
`36
`
`Sacks
`
`Sacks
`
`37
`
`Page 4 of 18
`
`

`

`
`
`Biaxial Mechanical Behavior
`
`
`
`The purpose of the present study was to examine the effects of cyclic loading of
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`intact porcine aortic valve bioprostheses. Any valve that undergoes prolonged
`
`
`
`
`
`accelerated testing will eventually fail. We hypothesize that gradual cycle-depen­
`
`
`
`
`dent changes in the properties of a tissue valve will occur due solely to the me­
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`chanical loading. Long-term fatigue of intact porcine aortic bioprostheses up to
`
`
`
`was 5.4 years at 70 beats/min) 200 X 106 cycles (equivalent to approximately
`
`
`
`
`
`studied to develop a better understanding of the initial mechanisms that eventu­
`
`
`
`
`ally lead to fatigue failure of porcine aortic valves.
`
`
`
`Materials and Methods
`
`
`
`SPECIMEN PREPARATION
`
`Porcine bioprosthetic heart valves were prepared by chemical fixation in 0.625%
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`glutaraldehyde under 0.5 k:Pa (4 mmHg) differential pressure (forcing leaflets to
`coapt)
`
`
`
`
`
`and provided by St. Jude Medical (St. Paul, MN). The intact valves were
`
`
`
`
`
`subjected to standard accelerating testing protocols for O (noncyded), 1.4, 5.7,
`
`
`
`
`
`10.1, 50, and 200 million cycles. The fixed valves were mounted in silastic con­
`
`
`
`
`
`duits to simulate the aortic root, and subjected to standard accelerated testing
`
`
`
`
`used for Food and Drug Administration approval in sterile saline at a rate of
`
`
`
`
`
`approximately 1000 cycles/min (16 Hz). After cycling, the valves were stored in
`
`at 4°C and sent to our laboratory in their mounts. All
`0.625% glutaraldehyde
`
`
`
`
`
`valves were fully functional and without visual evidence of tearing or perforation.
`
`
`
`
`
`Before testing, the cusps were carefully excised from the valves using microscissors.
`
`
`
`
`
`At least eight cusps from each accelerated testing level were mechanically tested.
`
`
`
`
`
`All biaxial experiments were performed in isotonic (0.9% wt/wt) saline at room
`(20°C-25°C).
`temperature
`
`
`
`BIAXIAL TESTING
`
`One square specimen was cut from the center of each leaflet with the edges align ed
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`to the circumferential and radial directions (Fig. 1). The specimen sizes ranged
`
`
`
`from 10 to 16 mm on each side depending upon valve annular diameter, which
`
`
`ranged from 20 to 28 mm. Four small graphite markers 150 µm) were af­
`
`
`
`
`fixed to the ventricular surface with low-viscosity Lyanoacrylate adhesive
`
`
`
`
`(Permabond International, Englewood, NJ). A 2.5-mm intermarker spacing was
`
`
`
`used in most cases. Thus the central measurement area was less than 10% of the
`
`total leaflet area in all specimens.
`While the specimen was floating unconstrained in the saline bath, the reference
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`marker positions (gauge lengths) were recorded with a CCD camera. The strain
`
`
`
`
`
`resolution was approximately 0.5% with the typical marker spacing of 200 pix­
`
`
`
`els. Two loops of nylon suture of equal length were attached to each side of the
`
`
`
`
`
`
`specimen with four stainless steel surgical staples (one staple at each end of each
`
`
`
`This procedure was completed in saline on a lab bench away from the
`loop).
`
`
`
`
`
`biaxial testing device to minimize tissue deformation.
`
`Sacks
`
`37
`
`Page 5 of 18
`
`

`

`Behavior
`Mechanical
`Biaxial
`
`cycle was calculated
`by
`the loading
`Tension (T, in units of Nim) throughout
`width
`specimen
`undeformed
`axial force (F) by the original
`the measured
`dividing
`(L) over which it acts (R = radial,
`C = circumferential).
`The equations
`for the
`graphically
`in
`are defined
`and lengths
`and the corresponding
`forces
`axial tensions
`1 (c).
`Figure
`valve cusp are complicated
`in the aortic
`of the strain
`and analysis
`Measurement
`and large radial
`properties,
`material
`anisotropic
`structure,
`by its heterogeneous
`is also profoundly
`af­
`of the tissue
`of the extensibility
`Calculation
`compliance.
`For these studies,
`all
`length).
`(reference
`of the gauge length
`by the choice
`fected
`state where the specimen
`was
`were calculated relative
`to the unloaded
`strains
`and any deformation
`was im­
`it was mounted
`in the saline bath
`before
`floating
`(E.)
`tensor
`strain
`the Green's
`large deformation,
`Since the cusps undergo
`posed.
`from the marker data using an isoparametric
`finite
`was used and was calculated
`axes, the
`to the stretch
`4 When the sample axes are aligned
`method.13
`element
`= ER, = radial
`strain,
`E22 = EC' = circum­
`tensor
`are E11
`of the strain
`components
`at any point within
`The strains
`= ERc' = shear strain.
`= E21
`ferential strain,
`and E12
`the homogeneity
`of the
`the marker area can be linearly interpolated
`to assess
`comparisons
`with
`and to facilitate
`For ease of understanding
`field.
`deformation
`in terms of percent strain,
`are presented
`in the heart valve literature,
`results
`values
`with the equation:
`which is computed
`= (V2E + 1 -1)*100% (1)
`in% = (A -1)*100%
`Strain
`ratio and E is Green's strain
`of the marker area
`in the center
`where A is the stretch
`direction.
`or circumferential
`the radial
`in either
`tissue
`of the cuspal
`behavior
`anisotropic
`the complete
`In order to fully capture
`was sub­
`each specimen
`modeling,
`data from material
`sufficient
`and to obtain
`The ratio of peak
`protocols.
`experimental
`of seven different
`to a series
`jected
`in a triangular
`loading
`pat­
`the two lab axes was held constant
`between
`tensions
`R:Tc
`The followingT
`using a 10�20 second loading
`period.
`tern in each protocol
`and 1:0.2 (Fig. 2). The
`1:0.5,
`1:1, 1:0.75,
`0.75:1,
`0.5:1,
`were used: 0.05:1,
`ratios
`in the 0.5: 1 protocol
`were
`was 60 Nim; thus the maximum tensions
`peak tension
`were performed
`experiments
`= 30 Nim and Tc= 60 N/m. Single-axis
`TR
`Tension on the
`(1 :0.2 protocol).
`and radially
`1 protocol)
`circumferentially
`(0.05:
`In each protocol the
`to avoid folding of the specimen.
`axis was necessary
`lateral
`representative.
`Al­
`considered
`the last cycle
`12 times with
`was cycled
`specimen
`due to hyster­
`different
`were slightly
`phases
`and unloading
`though the loading
`study.
`in the current
`phase was analyzed
`only the loading
`esis,
`
`•1
`
`MODELING
`MICROSTRUCTURAL
`
`characteriza­
`in material
`models avoid ambiguities
`constitutive
`Microstructural
`into the function, structure,
`of tissue
`com­
`and mechanics
`tion and offer insights
`when mounting
`of the tissue
`misalignment
`such as
`effects
`In particular,
`ponents.
`axes can also be examined. Moreover, struc­
`the material
`between
`and coupling
`and the fiber properties
`can be
`for in the analysis
`are accounted
`tural differences
`This tech-
`themselves.
`fibers
`in the collagen
`changes
`thus assessing
`predicted,
`
`Behavior
`Mechanical
`Biaxial
`
`nodulus free edge
`
`belly
`basal attachment
`
`(a)
`
`(b)
`
`(c)
`
`Figu re 1.
`areas
`(a) the belly and nodulus
`demonstrating
`valve leaflet
`aortic
`porcine
`An excised
`marker positioning,
`and (c) a
`and approximate
`specimen
`of a biaxial
`and (b) selection
`for radial
`and the equations
`of the axial forces and lengths
`representation
`schematic
`to avoid mechanical
`are off-center
`The marker positions
`tensions.
`and circumferential
`are shown.
`directions
`and circumferential
`The radial
`of the nodulus.
`effects
`
`with the radial
`and
`carriages
`onto the biaxial
`was then mounted
`The specimen
`device,
`testing
`with the lab axes. The biaxial
`aligned
`directions
`circumferential
`to accommo­
`carriages
`rotating
`with special
`11 was modified
`elsewhere,
`described
`around small
`were looped
`The sutures
`specimens.
`nonhomogenous
`date the small,
`equal
`rod. This method assured
`to a pivoting
`which were connected
`pulleys,
`multiple
`force
`the use of hydraulics,
`on a given side without
`staple
`force on each
`were at­
`Small floats
`line tensions.
`suture
`or tuning of individual
`transducers,
`The axial
`buoyant.
`sample neutrally
`mounted
`to make the
`to each staple
`tached
`at 12 to 15 Hz during
`recorded
`were continuously
`forces and marker positions
`was 1 mN (0.1 g).
`of the force transducers
`The resolution
`and unloading.
`loading
`solution
`and
`in saline
`each cusp was bathed
`During the biaxial mechanical
`tests,
`positioned stepper
`motors.
`by two sets of orthogonally
`stretched
`The char­
`back pressure.
`by the aortic
`the PAV cusps are loaded
`During diastole,
`choice
`for
`axes the natural
`on the tissue
`makes the forces
`acter of this loading
`were run under load
`the experiments
`Accordingly,
`testing.
`of the biaxial
`control
`of the force per unit of undeformed
`and peak values
`profile
`The triangular
`control.
`(force/
`Tension (force/length)
`or stress
`by custom software.
`were controlled
`length
`the force for the size of the leaflet.
`In the
`area) could be chosen to normalize
`in the fibrosa
`fibers
`and elastin
`by the collagen
`most of the load is carried
`leaflet,
`load and is believed
`to
`tensile
`very little
`carries
`the spongiosa
`and ventricularis;
`Thus the total thick­
`the other layers.
`the shear forces between
`to reduce
`function
`the load-bearing
`cross­
`represent
`does not accurately
`all three layers
`ness including
`and a peak level
`variable
`as the control
`was chosen
`area.12 Thus tension
`sectional
`loads in the belly of the cusp.
`physiologic
`to produce
`of 60 Nim was selected
`
`Sacks
`
`Sacks
`
`39
`
`Page 6 of 18
`
`

`

`
`
`Biaxial Mechanical Behavior
`
`Tension (T, in units of Nim) throughout the loading cycle was calculated by
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`dividing the measured axial force (F) by the original undeformed specimen width
`
`
`
`
`(L)over which it acts (R = radial, C = circumferential). The equations for the
`
`
`
`
`
`
`axial tensions and the corresponding forces and lengths are defined graphically in
`
`Figure I (c).
`Measurement and analysis of the strain in the aortic valve cusp are complicated
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`by its heterogeneous structure, anisotropic material properties, and large radial
`compliance.
`
`
`
`
`Calculation of the extensibility of the tissue is also profoundly af­
`
`
`
`
`
`
`fected by the choice of the gauge length (reference length). For these studies, all
`
`
`
`
`
`strains were calculated relative to the unloaded state where the specimen was
`
`
`
`
`
`floating in the saline bath before it was mounted and any deformation was im­
`(E.)
`
`
`
`
`
`posed. Since the cusps undergo large deformation, the Green's strain tensor
`
`
`
`was used and was calculated from the marker data using an isoparametric finite
`
`4 When the sample axes are aligned to the stretch axes, the
`
`
`element method.13
`
`
`
`
`strain, components of the strain tensor are E11 = ER, = radial E22 = EC' = circum­
`
`
`
`ferential strain, and E12 = E21 = ERc' = shear strain.
`
`The strains at any point within
`
`
`
`the marker area can be linearly interpolated to assess the homogeneity of the
`
`
`
`deformation field. For ease of understanding and to facilitate comparisons with
`
`
`
`
`
`values in the heart valve literature, results are presented in terms of percent strain,
`
`which is computed with the equation:
`
`
`Strain in%= (A -1)*100% = (-Y2E + I -1)*100% (I)
`
`where A is the stretch ratio and E is Green's strain
`
`in the center of the marker area
`
`
`
`in either the radial or circumferential direction.
`In order to fully capture the complete anisotropic behavior of the cuspal tissue
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`and to obtain sufficient data from material modeling, each specimen was sub­
`
`
`
`
`jected to a series of seven different experimental protocols. The ratio of peak
`
`
`
`
`
`tensions between the two lab axes was held constant in a triangular loading pat­
`
`
`
`
`
`TR:Tc The followingloading period. tern in each protocol using a 10�20 second
`
`
`
`ratios were used: 0.05: I, 0.5: I, 0.75: I, I: I, I :0.75, I :0.5, and I :0.2 (Fig. 2). The
`
`
`
`peak tension was 60 Nim; thus the maximum tensions in the 0.5:1 protocol were
`
`
`TR= 30 Nim and Tc= 60 Nim. Single-axis experiments were performed
`
`
`
`
`
`circumferentially (0.05: I protocol) and radially (I :0.2 protocol). Tension on the
`
`
`
`lateral axis was necessary to avoid folding of the specimen. In each protocol the
`
`
`
`
`specimen was cycled 12 times with the last cycle considered representative. Al­
`
`
`
`
`
`though the loading and unloading phases were slightly different due to hyster­
`
`
`
`
`esis, only the loading phase was analyzed in the current study.
`
`'1
`
`
`MICROSTRUCTURAL MODELING
`Microstructural constitutive models avoid ambiguities in material characteriza­
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`tion and offer insights into the function, structure, and mechanics of tissue com­
`
`
`
`
`
`ponents. In particular, effects such as misalignment of the tissue when mounting
`
`
`
`
`and coupling between the material axes can also be examined. Moreover, struc­
`
`
`
`
`tural differences are accounted for in the analysis and the fiber properties can be
`
`
`
`
`
`
`predicted, thus assessing changes in the collagen fibers themselves. This tech-
`
`Sacks
`
`39
`
`Page 7 of 18
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`Biaxial Mechanical Behavior
`
`70
`
`60
`
`� 50
`
`C 40
`
`'iii
`C
`30
`
`- �
`
` 20
`
`10
`
`0
`0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
`
`
`Circumferential tension (N/m)
`
`Figur e 2.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`The seven tension protocols used for tension-controlled biaxial materials testing. The
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`ratios indicate the ratio of radial to circumferential tensions in each protocol. The outer
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`in cross-coupling due to the differences are different protocols (0.2: 1 and 1 :0.05)
`between the axes.
`
`nique may reduce the variation in material parameters such as peak extension
`
`
`
`
`
`
`due to structural inhomogeneities and mounting artifact.
`15 it is assumed that the PBHV cusps consist of a
`
`
`
`Following Lanir and colleagues,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`network of primarily collagen fibers embedded in a fluid-like matrix. It is further
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`assumed that the strain energy is stored as extensional strain energy of the fibers
`
`
`
`
`and that the fiber deformations are affine. The angular distribution of fibers,
`
`
`
`Rcf(8), and the fiber material constants can be estimated from the mechanical
`
`
`
`
`data. The resulting expressions for the two tensions for the collagen fiber net­
`
`
`work, T;; and T;�, are given for a biaxial testing state by:
`
`8°1tl2
`
`T;; = JRcf(8)Tcf (E)cos2(8)d8
`
`8°-1t/2
`
`8°1t/2
`
`T�;= JRcf(8)Tc{(E)sin
`2(8)d8
`
`8°-1t/2
`
`(2)
`
`where 8 is the angle is the angle with respect to the x1 stretch
`
`axis and Er is the
`
`fiber strain given by:
`
`where E,j are the Green's
`
`
`
`(3)
`
`strains. T/ is the effective collagen fiber tension. In this
`
`
`
`40
`
`Sacks
`
`Page 8 of 18
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`Biaxial Mechanical Behavior
`
`60
`
`-+I I
`0
`0
`81
`01
`50 81
`'6 I
`01
`
`
`
`Peak radial strain •
`•
`•
`•
`•
`•
`•
`•
`•
`•
`
`
`
`Peak circumferential strain
`
`:
`I
`
`40
`--E
`�
`C 30
`
`'iii
`C
`
`20
`
`10
`
`-10 0 10
`50 60 70 80
`20 30
`40
`
`Strain(%)
`
`Figu re 3.
`Representative tension-strain plot for an equibiaxial tension protocol ( 1: 1 in Fig. 2) of a
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`fixed porcine aortic valve cusp. The definitions of peak radial (closed circles) and
`
`
`
`
`circumferential (open circles) strains are shown graphically. Note the nonlinear shape of
`
`
`
`
`between the axes. strains due to coupling the curves and the negative circumferential
`
`formulation, the effective fiber tension-strain law incorporates the effects of fiber
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`crimp, and is assumed to be of the form:
`
`Tt = A[exp(B E)-1]
`(4)
`
`
`
`where A and B are constants. A and B are computed by nonlinear regression
`
`
`using the Powell method for multidimensional minimization.
`16 With this model,
`
`
`
`
`simulation of the stresses for a given strain state is straightforward. However, to
`
`
`
`
`
`simulate the strains resulting from the experimental tension protocols, equation
`
`(2)was numerically inverted.
`
`Results
`
`The tension-strain curves for equibiaxial tensile loading of a noncycled valve are
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`shown in Figure 3. The nonlinear monotonically increasing curve for the radial
`
`
`
`direction is characteristic of most soft biological tissues.
`
`17 In contrast, the nega­
`
`
`
`tive strains and slope of the curve for the circumferential direction is found only
`
`
`
`
`
`mechanical coupling between the tissues with pronounced in highly anisotropic
`
`
`
`
`
`material axes. This mechanical coupling causes the strain to decrease along an
`
`Sacks
`
`4I
`
`Page 9 of 18
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`Biaxial Mechanical Behavior
`
`0.5:1
`
`0.75:1
`
`"' i+ 0.2:1
`
`Increasing
`
`radial load
`
`Increasing
`circumferential
`load
`
`70
`
`60
`
`50
`
`40
`
`'iii 30
`
`20
`
`10
`
`0
`
`-20 0
`
`20 40 60 80
`
`Strain(%)
`
`Figu re 4.
`Representative tension-strain curves from a noncycled porcine aortic valve cusp for all
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`seven tension protocols. Note the changes in the curves due to increasing lateral
`
`
`loading. The ratio of radial to circumferential tensions is given next to each curve.
`
`7
`6 • Data mean ± SEM
`1.54*1og(N)-0.5,r2=0.60
`....... 5
`c"o'!-
`0 _.
`·-C 4
`Ill ·-
`C ca
`-= 3
`Q)
`:!:: Ill
`:::,-
`CT.� 2
`Q) -C
`E a,
`:::J ...
`E .!·-E 0
`>< :::J ca u
`:!: .!::: -1
`(J
`-2
`
`-3
`
`10
`
`100
`
`1000
`
`6
`N X 10
`
`Figu re 5.
`Circumferential strains at 60 N/m equibiaxial tension. A trend towards increasing
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`extensibility with number of cycles was found in the circumferential direction.
`
`42
`
`Sacks
`
`Page 10 of 18
`
`

`

`
`
`Biaxial Mechanical Behavior
`
`
`
`axis even when the axial load is increasing. This cross-coupling effect can be seen
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`even more readily in Figure 4 where the tension-strain curves are plotted for all
`
`
`seven tension loading protocols (Fig. 2).
`
`PEAK EXTENSIBILITY
`
`The peak extensions in both the circumferential and radial directions were highly
`
`
`
`
`variable
`
`
`
`
`within specimen groups at all fatigue levels. The mean strains at peak
`
`
`
`
`
`
`testing levels in for all accelerated equibiaxial tension of 60 Nim are plotted
`
`
`
`
`
`Figure 5 for the circumferential direction and in Figure 6 for the radial direction.
`
`
`
`
`
`A trend towards increased extensibility with the number of applied cycles was
`
`
`
`
`found in the circumferential direction. The radial extensibility did not change
`
`substantially. Analysis of the peak extensions in both directions for the other
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`biaxial protocols yielded similar results.
`
`
`
`MICROSTRUCTURAL MODEL
`
`of the axes by curves caused by misalignment The alteration in the tension-strain
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`in the micro­fiber distribution a 10° shift to the
`10° was simulated by adding
`
`
`
`
`
`structural model, as plotted in Figure 7. In this example, the peak extensibility in
`
`
`
`
`
`the radial direction decreased by 25%. This result suggests that much of the error
`
`
`
`
`in peak extensibility may be due to unavoidable specimen misalignments with
`
`80
`
`• Data mean ± SEM
`2=0.067
`-1.61 *log(N)+64,r
`
`I
`1
`I
`
`I!
`1
`
`·-C:
`:::J·-
`
`Q)
`
`C:
`0
`·en.-.
`c:�
`! _. 70
`CT ca
`-=Ill
`Em 60
`E-c ·- ca
`>< ...ca
`50
`
`:::,
`__
`
`0
`
`10
`
`100
`
`1000
`
`6
`N x 10
`
`
`
`Radial strains at 60 N/m equibiaxial tension. No trend in extensibility was found in the
`
`Figu re 6.
`
`
`
`
`radial direction.
`
`Sacks
`
`43
`
`Page 11 of 18
`
`

`

`
`
`Biaxial Mechanical Behavior
`
`
`
`60 circumferential
`
`c,ircumferential
`
`I
`
`Valve cusp axes aligned
`± 1 0° off of the biaxial I
`test axes
`�! I
`
`I
`
`50
`
`--I4
`
`C:
`
`0
`
`30
`"iii
`C:
`
`�
`20
`
`10 I
`
`I
`
`0
`
`-20 0
`
`I
`
`I
`
`,
`
`, ,
`,
`
`----- - -
`
`40 60
`20
`Strain(%)
`(a)
`
`-5.0 -2.50.0
`80
`Strain(%)
`(b)
`
`Figu re 7.
`Model simulation demonstrating a large shift in the effective radial extension due to a
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`10° rotation of the specimen relative to the biaxial lest axes. Simulation of the valve
`
`
`
`aligned with the test axes is represented with the solid line. Simulation with a 10°
`
`
`
`rotation is represented with the dotted line. Both circumferential and radial curves are
`
`
`
`shown on the same strain scale in (a) for comparison. The circumferential curve only is
`
`shown with the expanded strain scale in (b) for clarity.
`
`the stress axis or specimen structural variations. Figure 8 shows the fit of the
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`model to a nonfatigued cusp. Only the equibiaxial tension protocol and the two
`
`
`extreme protocols (0.05: 1 and 0.2: 1) are shown for clarity. The model captures
`
`
`
`
`the complex features of the raw data such as the strong dependence of the strains
`
`
`
`on the cross-axis loads (cross-coupling) and the shape of the curves. The fit is
`
`
`
`
`
`good considering that the extreme protocols were not used to determine the
`
`material parameters.
`
`The model was next used to estimate the fiber material parameters for cusps from
`
`
`
`
`tested valve (Fig. 9a). The a noncycled valve and a 200 X 106 cycle accelerated
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`radial strains measured in the biaxial tests in the two cusps are similar; however,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`the circumferential strains are greater in the fatigued leaflet, as shown in detail in
`
`
`
`
`Figure 9b. The material constants, A and B, were computed with the micro­
`
`
`
`structural model using the method as described above. Fiber tension-strain curves
`
`
`
`
`generated using these constants (Fig. 10) show that the effective fiber stiffness of
`
`the 200 X 106 cycle cusp is much lower than the noncycled valve. The effective
`
`
`
`fiber tension represents the force per unit width of a load-bearing fiber. These
`
`
`
`
`
`
`results demonstrate that profound differences in the effective fiber properties can
`
`
`
`
`
`be extracted from seemingly similar whole tissue mechanical responses.
`
`44
`
`Sacks
`
`Page 12 of 18
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`Biaxial Mechanical Behavior
`
`circumferential
`0.2:1
`1:1 '
`
`radial
`1:0.05
`
`70
`
`60
`
`50
`
`-i
`
` 40
`
`-C:
`
`"iii
`30
`C:
`
`20
`
`10
`
`0
`
`-20
`
`0
`
`20 40
`
`60
`
`80
`
`Strain(%)
`
`Figu re 8.
`Model simulations (lines) superimposed on real tension-strain data (circles) for the
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`equibiaxial tension protocol and the extreme protocols (0.2: 1 and 1 :0.05). The extreme
`
`
`
`protocols were not used to fit the data. Note that the model simulates the form of th

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket