Application/Control Number: 11/175,885
`Art Unit: 2838
`
`Page 2
`
`-
`DETAILED ACTION
`Thefollowingis a quotation of the appropriaté paragraphsof 35 U.S.C.102 that
`form the basis for the rejections under this section madein this Office action:
`
`~.
`
`-A’person shall be entitled to a patent unless —
`
`_.’» (a) the inventionwas knownor used byothers in this country, or patented or describedin a printed
`'..° publication In this or a foreign country, before the Invention thereof by the applicant for a patent.
`
`ey Claims 1,2, 4 and 6-18 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a) as being anticipated
`: by Vesalic (Us 2004/0251878). The reference discloses a usb charger for a mobile
`> device wherein the usb cord is attached to the ac poweroutlet 130 of a conventional
`~ houseor not(dé sourcein this case), The device is configured to identify the operating
`- characteristics of the charger signal 115 (this case whetherthe usb cord is connected to
`the-ae or de (i.e. hub)). See column2.
`
`~
`
`|
`_ Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103
`a
`‘Thefollowingisa quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103(a) which formsthe basisfor all
`obviousnessrejectionsset forth in this Office action:
`
`(a) A patent may not be obtained though the invention is not identically disclosed or described as set
`forth in section 102 ofthis title, if the differences between the subject matter sought to be patented and
`the prior art are such that the subject matter as a whole would have been obvious at the time the
`invention was made to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which said subject matter pertains.
`Patentability shall not be negatived by the mannerin which the Invention was made.
`
`Claims 3 and 5 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being unpatentable over
`
`_Veselic (US 2004/0251878). The reference doesnot disclose the type of power plugs
`
`being used.
`
`It would have been obviousto one having ordinary skill in the art at the
`
`time the invention was made to have selected any type of plugs being American or
`
`European, since it has been held to be within the general skill of a workerin the art to
`
`Huawei v. FISI Exhibit 1002 - 76/175
`FISIO0000297
`
`Huawei v. FISI Exhibit 1002 - 76/175
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 11/175,885
`Art Unit: 2838
`
`Page 3
`
`- select a known material on the basisofits suitability for the intended use as a matter of
`
`- @bvious design choice. In re Leshin, 125 USPQ 416.
`
`Conclusion
`
`is - “Any inquiry concerning this communication should be directed to the Examinerat
`"the bélow-listed number on every Tuesday, Thursday and Saturday.
`_-... If attempts to reach the Examinerby telephone are unsuccessful, the Examiner's
`supervisor, Karl Easthom, can be reached at (571) 272-1989 on Monday-Thursday.
`Any inquiry of a general nature or relating to the status of this application should
`:
`be directed to the receptionist at (571) 272-2800, Monday-Friday, 8:30am to 5:00pm,
`BET.
`
`By:
`
`EDWARD H TSO
`Primary Examiner
`’ (571) 272-2087
`
`Huawei v. FISI Exhibit 1002 - 77/175
`FISI00000298
`
`Huawei v. FISI Exhibit 1002 - 77/175
`
`

`

` Application/Cantrol No.
`
`Applicant(s)/Patent Under
`Reexamination
`
`FISCHER ET AL.
`11/175,885
`
` Notice of References Cited
`
`Art Unit
`Examiner
`
` Page 1 of 4
`
`
`
`
`
`
`|| n
`
`l|P
`
`=
`
`FOREIGN PATENT DOCUMENTS
`
`Document Number
`’ Country Code-Number-Kind Code
`
`Date
`MM-YYYY
`
`Name
`
`Classification
`
`U.S. PATENT DOCUMENTS
`
`Edward H. Tso
`
`2838
`
`crcere
`=|o
`cle21s
`|e|us-
`|F.| US
`Ls
`= -
`
` ccawunill
`
`c id
`
`aecpcrc
`
`US-
`
`,
`Date
`Document Number
`
`
`
`Country Code-Numbar-Kind Code|MM-YYYY Country Classification
`
`*R copyof this relarence Is not boing furnished withthis Officeaction. (See MPEP § 707.05{a),)
`. Dates in MM-YYYY format are publication dates. Classifications may be US orforeign.
`U.S, Patent and ‘Trademark Offices
`PTO-892 (Rev. 01-2001)
`
`Notice at Referances Cited
`
`Part of Paper No, 032006
`
`Huawei v. FISI Exhibit 1002 - 78/175
`FISI00000299
`
`Huawei v. FISI Exhibit 1002 - 78/175
`
`

`

`Index of Claims
`
`3=z§=$tc5s%a‘aa<
`
`litnil
`ini
`
`11175
`885
`Examiner
`
`Edward H, Tso
`
`(Through numeral)
`Cancelled
`
`Restricted
`
`Interference
`
`Applicant(s)/Patent under
`Reexamination
`
`FISCHER ET AL.
`
`moBE
`
`te
`
`Rin|SSeS
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` SeSo
`
`
`
`
`aeole—-sigizigigsigiaie
`
`
`
` Bee) [pee
`
`SePedenboneredeisedeae
`
`
`
`30
`80
`134]||
`
`
`
`
`
`U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
`
`Part of Paper No, 032005
`
`Huawei v. FISI Exhibit 1002 - 79/175
`FISI00000300
`
`Huawei v. FISI Exhibit 1002 - 79/175
`
`

`

`Approved tor ved
`
`PTOVEB/ON (12-04)
`TIS1/2008. OM2 085 1.0032
`
`OTHER THAN
`
`SMALL ENTITY
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Office: U.8. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
`
`APPLICATION AS FILED - PART |
`Column 1)
`Column 2
`
`eh iidmanaxtha
`
`
`
`PBEARCHFEE
`[BT CA 444k).or mn
`EXAMINATION FEE
`37 CFR 4,48(0}, ip}, o tal
`[TOTAL CLAIMS
`3? CFR 1. 18i
`INDEPENDENT CLAIMS
`37 CFR 1.16(h))
`
`
`FIRST PRESENTATION Of MULTIOLE LiCPELDEWI Chane yr eras Ness ¢a
`
`
`TCHAD AMENDMENT6
`
`
`
`
`’
`
`+
`
`
`
`
`
`.
`
`.
`
`
`
`
`
`Ifthe specification and drawitigs exceed 100
`APPLICATION SIZE
`
`
`sheats of paper, tha application size foo dua
`FEE
`
`
`#$ $250 ($125 tor small antily) tor eacts
`(37 CER 1 16(a))
`
`
`additional 50 sheets or lrnction {hersol Seo
`35. U.S.C. 43(a)(t)(G) and 37 CFR 1.16fs),
`
`
`MULTIPLE DEPENDENT CLAIM PRESENT (a7 CFR I 104)))
`
`“tt the differance in column 1 ts loss than revo, eater“ In columa J
`“
`APPLICATION AS AMENDED - PART It
`¢Colurndy
`{Cotyen2)
`/?AD O6 (Cotwrnn 1)
`of
`i
`
`
`CLAIMS
`HIGHEST
`
`
`
`REMAINING
`NUMBER
`PRESET
`
`
`AFTER
`PREVIOUS¥
`
`Pai fon
`AMEHOMENT
`
`
`
`ante
`
`Total
`
`197 CFA o terry 3
`Application Sine Fee (37 CFR 4 1645))
`
`Fe
`
`AMENDMENTA
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`TOTAL
`
`SMALL ENTITY
`
`™
`
`SMALL ENTITY
`OTHER THAN
`
`Ago
`TIONAL
`FEE (§
`
`3 ¢ 2
`abu. FEL
`
` yieawmn 3.
`(Coturne #,
`Cuanih
`CLAMS
`HIGHEST
`
`REMAINING
`NUMBE fi
`PRESEN
`
`FUSTE (85
`
`
`
`PRE VICHIS; +
`AFTER
`AME MOMENT
`
`
`
`AOL FEL | Oe
`
`
`Tota!
`COUPE tha
`
`ts) Cre cei
`Indepangeal
`
`Boris
`
`Application Ste Fae (J? CEA 1 1Bign
`PIRST PRESEMTAteray ret Ka Nit £ a eraer Sy anne
`
`* Hthe entry in celunin tas tess Weare dhe, ey galynit Soweto any
`
`“AL thg “Mighos| Mumba Prewount Pare Fav’ it THIS SEs
`fee
`te
`
`“CU the ‘Highest Number Piteously Pag Foe IN THIS StACE oy Inve ce an 4 rege
`
`The “Highest Number Prewously Pant Fav" (Totat or indesondentas Shee tig e gt agraeter toyaneey ee EM ALPEENT Uaete ates
`Mes collectinn of wleimaben is teoumnd ty 2s CER TTR ine vilnungtsr on
`Eo oN
` sot
`ter (aad i The
`
` hee Any sgn
`MAGE eeraaap eddy
`USPIGte acess an apple gine Contdentalely is groomer ln Re tee
`toctuding gahening, Ig peatinng aid Subraritergy Mee Come ied ages.
`f
`
`
`
`
`ORE pe te
`tte
`|
`‘ht
`on
`On The Bron OL lee yOu nega e Ie CAMplete thee Jorn andre
`6
`fa tet, leeLe UN
`
`O Abpandng 2 GeV COT abt PER te ger. gd BOGOR RS Te Ds
`ahd Tradamark Oleg, US Benaingnt st Commer GO Bee
`ACORESS SEND TO: Commissioner for Patents. PO Box #480. Alexandeia, VA 22343-1460
`FO. Seeat rstanee meas Yabo gt
`ee a Ge Oe
`
`Huawei v. FISI Exhibit 1002 - 80/175
`FISI00000301
`
`Huawei v. FISI Exhibit 1002 - 80/175
`
`

`

`
`JAN 9, 0 2008
`
`3).
`
`
`~ Group'Art Unit: 2838
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`Attorney Docket No. 555255-012844 —
`
`)
`
`)
`
`)
`)
`)
`
`)
`
`)
`)
`
`Amendment
`
`Examiner; Edward H. Tso
`
`Inventor: ©...» Fischer, et al.
`os
`SEE et
`_ Serial No.:
`|
`1+ ony ANATBOO
`
`Filed:
`
`July’06, 2005
`
`«Boge 3
`aoe
`en
`
`~~ Multifunctional Charger System
`~*~
`and Method
`
`.
`
`) C
`
`ERTIFICATE OF MAILING
`
` ourhereby certify that this correspondenceiis being deposited with the UnitedStates Postal Service as
`Jirst class mail in an envelope addressed to: MailStopAmendment, Commissionerfor Patents,
`_ P.O. Box 1450, Alexandria, VA 22313-1450 on
`
`eS “MailStop Amendment-
`Commissioner for Patents’
`- P.O. Box 1450
`Alexandria, VA 22313- 1450
`
`Sir:
`
`In response to the Office Action mailed on October 20, 2005, please amend the application as
`
`follows and consider the following remarks. Any fees due should be charged to Jones Day Deposit
`
`Account No. 501432,ref: 555255-012844,
`
`CLI-1369049v1 ,
`$55255 -O12844-
`
`1
`
`Huawei v. FISI Exhibit 1002 - 81/175
`Fisio0000302
`
`Huawei v. FISI Exhibit 1002 - 81/175
`
`

`

`AMENDMENTTO THE SPECIFICATION
`Please dain the titleofthe application asfollows:
`
`oe Multifunctional-Charger-System-and-Methed
`A Universal Serial Bus Adapter for.a Mobile
`
`ie0se : oo
`
`
`
`:
`
`1S | Please amend dheparagraph beginning at page 1, line 4 ofthe specification,as follows: | -
`- This application is a continuation United States Patent Application No, 10/087,629,entitled
`4 “Mfultifunctional Charger System and Method,” which wasfiled on March |, 2002, and issued as United -
`, StatesPatentNo. 6,936,936, United States Patent Application No. 10/087, 629 claims priority fromand —_ -
`‘is related to United States Provisional Application No, 60/273,021, entitled “System and Method for
`: Adapting a USB to Provide Power forCharging a Mobile Device,” which was filed on March 1, 2001,
`| : and United States Provisional Application No. 60/330,486, entitled “Multifunctional Charger System and
`|
`: Method”, which‘was filed on October 23, 2001. The entirety of these prior applications are hereby
`- jncorporated into the presentapplication by reference.
`
`CLI-1369049v1
`558255 - 012844
`
`-
`
`cs
`
`&
`
`2
`
`Huawei v. FISI Exhibit 1002 - 82/175
`FISIO0000303
`
`Huawei v. FISI Exhibit 1002 - 82/175
`
`

`

`This dreendinent respondsto the office action mailed on October 20, 2005. The specification has
`bintninented to amendthetitle ofthe application and to add the patent number ofthe parent application.
`Claims 1-18 remainpendirig as originally filed, Reconsideration is respectfully requested in light of the
`
`~ followingremarks:
`
`~\.. Objection to the Specification
`
`a Phetitle is objectedto in the office action as not being descriptive of the invention. Thetitle has
`ti "been'aiiended to more clearly indicate the invention being claimed.
`
`. Claim Rejections under 35 U.S.C. § 102
`
`--Claitnis12, 4and6:18 standrejected under 35 U.S.C.§ 102(b) as beinganticipated by Gabehart
`ay (U.S. 6,130,518). These rejections are respectfully traversed. Among other distinctions, the Gabehart
`“reference does not disclose or suggest the generation of an identification signal which is configured to
`
`indicate to themobile device that the power socket is not a USB host or hub, as claimed in independent
`claims 1). 17 and 18, That is; the Gabehart reference does not determine if an attached power source is a
`“USB source: Rather, Gabehart assumes an existing connection to a databus (204), and determinesif -
`
`power is available from another external source (EXT B+) (i.c., a non-USB source).
`
`If poweris not
`
`available from the external source (EXT B+), then the Gabehart system "allows the battery 210 to be
`
`charged from the power available from the data bus 204." (Gabehart, col. 3, lines 16-17). The Gabehart
`
`reference does not even contemplate a situation in which the device is not connected to a databus.
`
`Consequently, the Gabehart reference clearly does not disclose or even remotely suggest determining if a
`
`connected power source is or is not a USB host or hub, as claimed. For this reason alone, the patent
`
`ownersubmits that claims 1, 17 and 18 are patentable over the Gabehart reference and are in condition for
`
`allowance, The remaining claims 2-16 each ultimately depend from claim 1, and are thus also in
`
`condition for allowance.
`
`CLI-1369049v1
`555255 012844
`
`3
`
`Huawei v. FISI Exhibit 1002 - 83/175
`FISI00000304
`
`Huawei v. FISI Exhibit 1002 - 83/175
`
`

`

`tt
`
`Moreover,
`
`the patent owner further submits that
`
`the rejections under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b)
`
`. esiiphaias fail to show correspondence between the cited Gabehart reference and the language of the
`
`‘claims, and therefore fail to make out a prima facie rejection under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b). Particularly with
`
`respectto the rejected dependentclaims, the office action does not even make an attempt to demonstrate
`
`' that the claim languageis anticipated by the cited Gabehart reference. For example, claim 7 recites that
`: "the identification subsystem comprises a hard-wired connection of a voltage level to one or more data
`- i in the USB connector." Even a cursory review of the Gabehart reference clearly shows that this
`_.
`imitation and other claimed limitations are not disclosed. The patent owner therefore respectfully
`
`- requests that these improperrejections under section 102(b) be withdrawn.
`
`"|= Claim Rejections under 35 U.S.C. § 103
`
`;
`
`: — Claims3 and 5 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over the Gabehart
`| teference and the knowledge generally recognized as being within the level of ordinary skill in the art.
`The patent owner respectfully disagrees. Nonetheless, claims 3 and 5 are patentable over the cited
`
`_
`
`references for at least the same reasons stated above with respect to independentclaim 1.
`
`Conclusion
`
`For the foregoing reasons, the patent owner respectfully submits that claims 1-18 are in condition —
`
`for allowance, The Examineris, therefore, respectfully requested to enter this amendmentand passthis
`
`case to issue,
`
`
`
`Jéseph M. Sauer (Reg. No. 47,919)
`F<]<<
`Jones
`North Point, 90! Lakeside Avenue
`Cleveland, Ohio 44114
`(216) 586-7506
`
`CLI-1369049V1
`555253 - 012844
`
`og
`
`Huawei v. FISI Exhibit 1002 - 84/175
`FISI00000305
`
`Huawei v. FISI Exhibit 1002 - 84/175
`
`

`

`
`
`S
`
`UNrrep STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
`United States Potent ond Trademark Office
`Address:PnER FOR PATENTS
`Virginia 22313-1450
`WWW.ALplo.gov
`ATTORNEY DOCKET NO.
`
`K
`
`LL/175,885
`
`07/06/2005
`
`Daniel M. Fischer
`
`555255012844
`
`5606
`
`=
`JOSEPHM.SAUER-
`“JONES DAY REAVIS & POGUE
`NORTHPOINT, 901 LAKESIDE AVENU
`CLEVELAND, OH 44114 __
`Fa
`
`.
`
`TSO, EDWARD H
`
`.
`
`238
`DATE MAILED:10/20/2005
`
`Please find below and/orattached an Office communication concerningthis application or proceeding.
`
`_ PTO-90C (Rev. 10/03)
`
`Huawei v. FISI Exhibit 1002 - 85/175
`FiSi00000306
`
`Huawei v. FISI Exhibit 1002 - 85/175
`
`

`

`
`
`Application No.
`
`Applicant(s)
`
`11/175,885
`FISCHER ET AL.
`Office Action Summary
`Sxaniiier
`Art Unit
`rs
`2838
`« The MAILING DATEofthis SHapEDEBon appears on the coversheet with the sarrensaneoeryaddress --
`
`Period for Reply
`A SHORTENED STATUTORY PERIOD FOR REPLY IS SET TO EXPIRE 3 MONTH(S) OR THIRTY (30) DAYS,
`WHICHEVER IS LONGER, FROM THEMAILING DATE OF THIS COMMUNICATION.
`+ Extensions of ime may be available under the provisions of 37 CFR 1,136(a).
`In no event, however, may a reply be timely fled
`after SIX (6) MONTHS from the mailing date of this communication.
`IF NO period for reply is specified above, tha maximum statulory period will apply and will expire SIX (8) MONTHS from the mailing date of this communication,
`Failure to reply within the set or extended period for reply will, by statute, cause the application jo become ABANDONED (35 U.S.C. § 133).
`’ Any reply received by the Office later than three months after the mailing date of this communication, evenif timety filed, may reduce any
`earned patent ferm adjustment. See 37 CFR 1.704(b),
`
`
`
`Status ..
`1)C]_ Responsive to communication(s)filed on
`2a)(_]. This action is FINAL.
`_ 2b)This action is non-final.
`3)D0 : Since this applicationis in’ condition for allowance exceptfor formal matters, prosecution as to the merits is
`.closed in accordance with the practice under Ex parte Quayfe, 1935 C.D. 11, 453 0.G, 213,
`Disposition of Claims
`4)) Claim(s) 4-18 is/are:candi in the spsplicaition,
`
`4a) Of the above claim(s)
`is/are withdrawn from consideration.
`
`§)() Claim(s)
`is/are allowed,
`6)E) Claim(s) 4-18 is/are rejected.
`
`7)L) Claim(s)
`isfare objected to,
`8)L] Claim(s)
`are subject to restriction and/or election requirement.
`
`"|
`:
`
`
`
`| Application Papers
`9)() The specificationiiS obigeted.toBy the Examiner.
`10)[] The drawing(s)filed on
`isfare: a)[_] accepted or b){_] objected to by the Examiner.
`_ Applicant may not request that any objection to the drawing(s) be held in abeyance. See 37 CFR 1.85(a).
`-
`: ; z Replacement drawing sheet(s) including the correction is required if the drawing(s) is objected to. See 37 CFR 4.124(d).
`11) The oath er declaration is objected to by the Examiner, Note the attached Office Action or form PTO-152.
`| Priority under 35 U.S.C, § 119
`a4 12)Z0 Acknowledgmentis made of a claim for foreign priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119(a)-(d) or(f).
`rt
`a)LJ AN
` b)f_] Some * c)[_] None of:
`1.(] Certified copies of the priority documents have been received.
`2. Certified copies of the priority documents have been received in Application No.
`3.) Copies of the certified copies of the priority documents have been received in this National Stage
`
`SS
`
`-
`
` Attachment(s)
`
`application from the International Bureau (PCT Rule 17.2(a)).
`* See the attached detailed Office action for a list of the certified copies not received.
`
`
`
`a) Cc Interview Summary (PTO-413)
`1) fC] Notice of References Cited (PTO-892)
`Paper Na(s)/Mail Date.
`2) L] Notice of Oraftsperson's Patent Orawing Review (PTO-948)
`5) L) Notice ofinformal PatentApptApplication (PTO-152)
`3) Ed information Disclosure Statement(s) (PTO-1449 of PTO/S8/08)
`
`8) [_] Other:
`Paper No(s)/Mail Date 7/8/05.
`
`
`
`
`U.S.PatentandTrademarkOffice~=SSSCSCSC*~S .
`PTOL-326 (Rev. 7-05)
`Office Action Summary
`Part of Paper No./Mail Date 102005
`
`Huawei v. FISI Exhibit 1002 - 86/175
`FISIO0000307
`
`Huawei v. FISI Exhibit 1002 - 86/175
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 11/175,885
`_ Art Unit: 2838
`
`Page 2
`
`DETAILED ACTION
`
`‘Information Disclosure Statement
`ea creel
`“ | TheIDSfiled 7/6/05 has been considered and placed of record. Aninitialed copy’
`ig attached herewith.
`
`Specification
`eas a ‘Thetitle of the inventionis not descriptive. A new title is required that is clearly
`: ‘indicativé’of theinvention to which the claimsare directed.
`
`me The disclosure should be carefully reviewed to ensure that any andall
`
`grammatical, idiomatic, and spelling or other minor errors are corrected.
`
`|
`Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102
`: Thefollowing isa quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that
`form the basis for the rejections under this section madein this Office action:
`
`|
`
`A person shall be entitled to a patent unless —
`
`(b) the invention was patented or describedin a printed publication in this or a foreign country or in public
`use or on sale in this country, more than one yearprior to the date of application for patent in the United
`States.
`.
`
`Claims 1, 2, 4 and 6-18 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(b) as being anticipated
`
`. by Gabehart et al. (US 6,130,518), The reference discloses a method of charging a
`
`battery whereby the device has, inter alia, sensor to sense whether the powersourceis
`
`Huawei v. FISI Exhibit 1002 - 87/175
`FISIO0000308
`
`Huawei v. FISI Exhibit 1002 - 87/175
`
`

`

`~ Application/Control Number: 11/175,885
`Art Unit: 2838
`
`Page 3
`
`external or from a usb port. The arrangementallowsthe battery to be charged from the
`internal usb hub or not from the usb hub. See column 2, line 25 to column3, line 20.
`
`tas = Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103
`oe ss Thisapplication cuuttently namesjoint inventors.
`In considering patentability of
`itissaundsaner 35 U.S.C, 103(a), the examiner areaudnes that the subject matter of
`“the \iariodis claims was commonly ownedat the time any inventions covered therein
`_. were made absent any evidenceto the contrary. Applicantis advised of theobligation |
`Under 37 CFR 4.56 fo pointout the inventor and invention datesof each claim that was
`. ‘ ‘not commonly ownedat the timea later invention was madein orderfor the examinerto |
`| 2 considerthe applicability of 35 U.S.C. 103(c) and potential 35 U.S.C. 102(e), (f) or (g)
`: ‘prior art under36 U.S.C.103(a).
`|
`ne The followingis a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103(a) which forms the basis forall
`obviousness rejections setforthin this Office action:
`
`|
`
`(a) A patent may not be obtained though the invention is not identically disclosed or described as set
`forth in section 102 ofthis title, if the differences between the subject matter sought to-be patented and
`the prior art are such that the subject matter as a whole would have been obvious at the time the
`invention was made to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which said subject matter pertains.
`Patentability shall not be negatived by the manner in which the invention was made.
`
`Claims 3 and 5 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being unpatentable over
`
`Gabehart et al. (US 6,130,518). The reference is silent on the external power source
`
`plug being a variety of plugs.
`
`It would have been an obvious matter of design choice to -
`
`have changed the type of plug to fit the right application, since such a modification
`
`would have involved a mere change in the size and shape of a component. A changein
`
`Huawei v. FISI Exhibit 1002 - 88/175
`FISIO0000309
`
`Huawei v. FISI Exhibit 1002 - 88/175
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 11/175,885
`_ Art Unit: 2838
`.
`
`Page 4
`
`- size is generally recognized as being within the level of ordinary skill in the art.
`
`/n re
`
`- Rose, 105 USPQ 237 (CCPA 1955).
`
`Conclusion
`
`aeee Any inquiryconcerningthis communication should be directed to the Examinerat
`- the below-listed number. .
`If attempts to reachthe Examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the Examiner's —
`supervisor, Mike Sherry, can be reached on 571 272 2084.
`% _. ,.. Any inquiry of a general nature orrelating to the status of this application should
`be directed to the receptionist whose telephone numberis 571 272 2800, Monday-
`_ Friday, 8:30am to 5:00pm, EST.
`
`
`
`EDWARD H TSO
`Primary Examiner
`571 272 2087
`
`Huawei v. FISI Exhibit 1002 - 89/175
`FISI00000310
`
`Huawei v. FISI Exhibit 1002 - 89/175
`
`

`

`PTOMSBOA (08-03)
`Approved for use through 07/31/2006, OMB 0651-0031
`U.S, Patent and Trademark Office; U.S, OEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
`eqpond to a collection of information untoss it contains a valid OMB centro! number.
`
`
` Substitute for form 1449/PTO
`
`
`
`INFORMATION DISCLOSURE
`DanialM. Fischer
`
`
`-
`STATEMENT BY APPLICANT
`EE14=enaeepcemmmmoemetioniinciceremm—eeed
`
`
`(Use as many shoot aa necessary)
`[ExamineWane
`
`
`omplete if Known
`
`Application Number
`Fiting Oate
`~~
`
`
`
`Document Number
`
`Publica
`
`DOCUMENTS
`Nams of Patentee of
`Applicant ef Cited Document
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` MM-DD-VYYY
`Papeneureie, Unt, Sire
`Rolevant Passogas or Relevant
` TOS PANG (Oe
`Figures Appear
`
`
`3|Careoni|TSC*d(wa7iie7s
`|ZA}AB|"4.493.251 02/21/1984Banks,etal|
`PTS[ac [4,510,431
`oaariees [WinkerSCdTSCCSC~*~C~S~S
`
`|_|[AD|5,173,855 12/22/1992 ~ {Nellsen,et al. spec
`
`
`|__|Tag | 5,229 649|Nieisen,etal,TC077201993
`
`
`
`P|Tar [5,272,475 |Eaton,etal.+iStCtCS~SS1221/1993
`
`|[AG [5,444,278
`og/22iges [RogersCUdTCCSCSsdz
`HA 5,831,503
`REE ON
`
`
`
`|__|__| Al|¥* 6,638,540 EMOCGyAeeebeeeeereal
`
`||[Ad|5,651,057 {Bload,et al.|tts07/22/1997
`
`
`|__|AK|55,769,877 06/23/1998
`
`Ltfat [5,850,113
`12/15/1998 |Weimer,et al.
`
`
`|_|jam|*5,939,860 [08/17/1999 [WilliamDeieceenieeeageri
`
`[1Tan|6,104,762 |Sainsbury, et al.feeene~ {08/15/2000.
`
`
`
`|_|[AO|OF 6,104,789 08/15/2000_|Carkner, et al.eneney
`
`||[Ap|Y§6,252,375 06/26/2001~[Richter, et al.iLie cell|
`
`
`|__|.[AQ|¥* 6,211,649 04/03/2001 _[Matsud
`
`
`L_7_TAR|US 6,184,652 02/06/2001
`
`[AS|YS 6,006,088 _112/21/1999_ |Cousesd
`.
`OREIGNPATENTDOCUMENTS
`=
`¢
`
`:
`City
`coiled
`oreign Patent Document
`Publlortion
`Name of Patantes or
`Pages,
`Columns,
`Lines,
`
`Initials" Applicant of Cited Document|Whare Relevant PassagesNo, , Dato
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`~
`MM-DD-YYYY
`OrRelevant FiguresAppaar
`i
`‘
`fe?_|BA [WO 010133041
`wed
`
`nei—sgpsasincnpauscpcansieanntanaaessmasinnsssoeapeeenemeenge
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`z atauon woinconformanceGal f rave corp arad ar or het PEP 609. Draw lino through citalon 7 nel in contamande and nd
`
`
`
`
`
`
`consiiered. Include copy ef this form with next communication {6 8
`‘Applicant's unique ctation designation number (optional).
`7See Kinds Codes of
`USPTO Patent Documenta at yyw.uspto.noy or MPEP B01,04,
`7
`Office that Issued the document, by the tweHettar code CWOBandar $7.3). ‘ For
`Jepanase patent documents,the Indication of tha yoar ef the roign of the Emperor mus! precodn the serial number of the patent document,
`"Kind of document by
`en aymbalé as Indicated en tho document under WIPO Standard ST.16 H possinie, “Applicant la to place a chock mark here If English language
`re
`attached,
`This collection of Information |s required by 37 CFR 1.87 and 1.98, The Information ls required to abtaln or rowin a benofit by the publit which In to filo (and by the
`USPTO to process) an application, Confidentiality Is governed by 35 U.S.C, 122 and 37 GFR 1.14, This'colection fs estimated to take 2 hours to compiate,
`including gatharing,
`) 8nd submitting the completed application form to the USPTO. Tine wil very depending upon the Individual case, Any cammants .
`of the amount of time you require to complete this form and/or auggeatons for reducing this burden, should be sent to the Chiof information Oflicer, U.S. Patent
`and Trademark Offica, P.O, Box 1460, Alexandrla, VA 22313-1450, OO NOT SEND FEES OR COMPLETED FORMS TO THIS AODRESS, SEND
`TO: Commlasionar for Patants, P.O, Box 1450, Moxandrla, VA 22313-1450,
`ifyou nead assistance in completing the form, call 1-800-PTO-9199 (1-800-786-9199} and select option 2.
`
`
`
`
`Huawei v. FISI Exhibit 1002 - 90/175
`FISIO0000311
`
`Huawei v. FISI Exhibit 1002 - 90/175
`
`

`

`PTOMSBV/OBA (08-03)
`Approved for use through 07/31/2006, OMB 6651-0031
`U.S, Patent and Trademark Office; U.S, OEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
`reapo
`to
`ciocllection of
`
`cunt
`tl
`f
`A
`i
`HB
`A
`contre
`ber.
`
`
`Substitute for form 1449/PTO
`
`
`
`
`
`ing ata inaSal
`
`INFORMATION DISCLOSURE
`
`FeNad Tr
`‘STATEMENTBY APPLICANT
`
`ator
`
`
`(Uto os mony shoots a3 nocessary)
`EuarinerName
`
`
`Attomey Docket Number
`[So525501e044d=
`
`CSa
`_—=—_ =|Pures Popen
`||Fessost8——or0000
`ae
`
`TAU|6.255000Jormoaboo1Jao
`|_Jjava]6,138,242110/24/2000|Massmanetali[CS
`
`[Jaw[6285,709BT[0970472001]TeakJ
`
`eu bary lax
`266.668.296 BF
`
`
`
`Kajay |* 6738,856 Bi 05/18/2004|
`Milleyetal,
`ety ie
`|
`
`:
`
`U.S. PATEN
`
`nO
`
`:
`
`aF
`
` PATENTDOCUMENTS
`Pages, Golumna, Lines,
`f
`Publication
`Name of Patanioe or
`ate Applicant of Cited Documant|Where Relevant Passages
`
`MAM-DOEYYYY
`
`Or Relevant Figures Appear tts|| i
`
`qia
`
`oN
`
`~
`
`Oats
`
`“—
`
`Csa|
`
`
`
`
`
`
`EXAVINER: Initia! noi Gtaton lsiconformanceTf eferance considered, whether or with MPEP Guo. Dra ie ihrough qaten ¢ notin conformance and no
`
`
`
`
`considered, Include copy of thia form with next communication to.applicant ‘Applicants unique clinton designation sumber (optional.
`“Sea Kinds Codes of
`USPTO Patant Documents at www,usnte,noy or MPEP 604.04.
`? Enter Office that issued the document, by tha twolatter code (WIPO Standard 87.3), ‘ For
`Japanese patent documents, the Indication of tha year of the reign of tha Emperor must preceds the serial number of the patent document. "Kind of documentby
`vancnea symbols as indicated on the document under WIPO Standard ST.16 if possible. “Applicant is to place @ check mark hore if English language
`ra
`attached.
`This catloetcn of infarmaton ls required by 37 CFR 1.87and 1.88. Tho information is required to obtain or retain © benefit by the public which Is to file (and by tne
`USPTO to procoss) an application, Confidentiality ls governed by 25 U.S.C. 122 and 37 CFR 1.14. This collection Is eatimated tn take 2 hours to comptate,
`inducing gathering, preparing, and submitting tha completed application farm to tha USPTO. Time will vary depending upon the individual cose. Any commants
`an the amount of Hime you require to complote this form and/or suggestions for raduding
`thle burden, oheuid ba santto the Chief Information Officer, U.S. Patent
`and Trademark Office, P.O. Box 1450, Alaxandria, VA 22312-1450, CO NOT SEND
`FEES OR COMPLETED FORMS TO THIS ADORESS, SEND
`TO: Commisatenar for Potente, P.O, Bon 1460, Aloxandria, VA 22313-1450,
`ifyou need assistence in completing the form, cal 1-800-PTO-9199 (1-800-786-9199) and select option 2.
`
`Huawei v. FISI Exhibit 1002 - 91/175
`FISI00000312
`
`Huawei v. FISI Exhibit 1002 - 91/175
`
`

`

`Substitute for farm 1449/PTO
`
`PTO/SB/08B (08-03)
`i
`Approved for use through 07/31/2006. OMB 0651-0031
`u.as ree and Trademark Office: U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
`933 it contains a valid OMB contd number,
`Comp fate Known
`mepiontanba
`
`.
`
`INFORMATION DISCLOSURE
`
`STATEMENTBY APPLICANT eeere
`
`Indude name of the author (in CAPITAL LETTERS), title of the article (when appropriate),title of
`the item (book, magazine, Joumal, serial, symposium, caeetc.), date, pagers), volumedssue
`ublished
`Electric Double-Layer Capacitors, Vol. 2, 10/25/1996 (Japan, Tokin Corp.,
`Cat. No. EC-=
`
`
`
`|
`
`Examiner
`Sgnatve
`Teueran Tedube asen r bres nigh beak eeeenieamiaa es aceere
`1 Appiicant’s unique citation doalgnatien number (optional). 2 Appiicant ts to place a check mark here if English language Translation ls atinched,
`This cobection of Informaion is required by 37 CFR 1,98, The Information is roquirad to obtaln er retain 9 benefit by tha public whieh is to fle (and by tha USPTO:
`to process) an application, Contidantiaiity ia governed by 35 U.S.C, Yo? and 87CPR 1.14. This collection ls astimatind ta take 2 hours tocompleta, Inoluding
`shengA ova. ee ee ees eae re bea UTD. Time wil vary depending upon the indMdual cage, Any comments on the
`Uma you require to complete this form and/or suggestions for reducing this burden, should be sent to the Chief Informustion Officer, U.6. Patent and
`Teistan Gee Box 1480, Aloxandria, VA 22313-1450, 00 NOT SENDFiFEES OR COMPLETED FORMS TO THIS ADDRESS. SEND TO:
`Commissionor for Patents, P.O. Box 1450, Alexandria, VA 22313-4450,
`
`Date
`Considered
`
`|>
`
`if you need assistance In complating the form, call 1-800-PTO-9199 (1-800-786-9199) and select option 2.
`
`Huawei v. FISI Exhibit 1002 - 92/175
`FISIO0000313
`
`Huawei v. FISI Exhibit 1002 - 92/175
`
`

`

`
`Application/Control No.
`
`Applicant(s)/Patent under
`Reexamination
`
`FISCHER ET AL.
`
`
`
`
`Search Notes
`
`mI
`
`. SEARCHED
`
`Examiner
`
`
`
`
`
`
`41/475,885
`
`Edward H. Tso_
`
`2838
`
`SEARCH NOTES|DINGSEARCHerear
`
`checked references on parentfile
`
`10/1/2005,
`
`
`
`
`
`U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
`
`Part of Paper No. 102005
`
`Huawei v. FISI Exhibit 1002 - 93/175
`FISI00000314
`
`Huawei v. FISI Exhibit 1002 - 93/175
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`“PlesTTTTTT
`i)>;apisisisieseis
`
`
`
`SomaBEGEEEPEEEEEESSEEBEEEECEEEEEEEEEEEELEELETHE
`
`
`
`Index of Claims
`
`Apptication/Control No,
`
`Applicant(s)/Patent under
`Reexamination
`FISCHER ET AL.
` 11/175,885
`Examiner
`Art Unit
`
`Edward H. Tso
`
`iLltwn
`EakKs
`
`(Through numeral)
`Cancelled
`
`Non-Elected
`
`i soe meee
`
`
`masuo[-lvio|<lelolnfellatelee
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`67
`
`
`
`;
`
`|47
`
`U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
`
`Part of Paper No, 102005
`
`Huawei v. FISI Exhibit 1002 - 94/175
`FISI00000315
`
`Huawei v. FISI Exhibit 1002 - 94/175
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`==—=
`
`S09040
`
`ES
`Express Mail Label No,
`
`Pig
`
`APPLICATION ELEMENTS
`se
`. See MPEP chapter 600 concerning utility patent application contenis.
`
`.,
`
`ADDRESS TO:
`
`2
`
`|E¥ 302225424 US
`Commissioner for Patents
`P.O. Box 1450
`Alexandria VA 22313-1450
`
`ACCOMPANYING APPLICATION PARTS
`
`9. C2) assignment Papers (cover sheet & document(s)
`
`]
`
`Name of Assignee Research In Motion Limited
`
`40.
`
`37 CFR 3.73(b) Statement
`(when (here is an assignee)
`
`[7jPower of
`Attorney
`
`1.7]
`
`a 3
`
`.01.
`
`13. C1] protiminary Amendment
`
`e
`
`
`
`
`* .Alsoénclosedwith#5b-CopyofLettertoDanRadut,B
`
`PTO/SBI0S (09-04)
`Approved for use through 07/31/2006. OMB 0651-0032
`EES
`U.S, Patent and Trademerk Ofice. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
`aa c
`acollection of information unless it displays a valic OMB control
`number.
`respond to
`required to
`are
`ho persons
`of
`aperwork Reduction Act
`er
`ES 5
`
`BS Attomey Docket No,_{995265012844
`Old
`UTILITY
`PATENT APPLICATION
`TRANSMITTAL
`“(Only for new nonproviional appications under37 OFR 1.63(b))
`
`
`8. Nucledtide and/or Amino Acid Sequence Submission
`15. [__] Certified Copy of Priority Document(s)
`a ts
`(ifforeignpriority is claimed)
`"(ifapplicable, tems @,~¢. are required)
`a.
`Computer Readable Form (CRF)
`eae“BS ange,LIsting.on:
`es“=Applicant’musbatiach-form-PTO/SB/S5orequivatents=.fe Tp am
`: 4
`Nonpublication Request under 35 U.S.C. 122(b)(2(B)().
`16
`Ol a i peo
`fication.Seq
`isti
`oO
`ty
`Q
`4 3
`17. (2) otner: Copy ofWorldwide Assignment (6 pas)
`WEL Peer Hse ERE
`to complete Item 10 above “es 6 CJ Siatemenis verifying identity of above copies
`
`Fee Transmittal Form (e.g., PTO/SB/17)
`(Submit an orginal and @ duplicate for fee processing)
`Applicant claims small antity status.
`See 37 CFR 1.27.
`26
`[Tata! Pages.
`Specification
`Both the claims and abstract must start on a new page
`(Por information on ihe prefered
`{, see MPEP 608.01{a))
`4[Z]
`}
`Drawing(s) (35 U.S.C, 173)
`[Total Sheets
`4
`[Total Sheets
`3.3]
`/
`§. Oath or Oeclaration
`a.
`Newly executed (original or copy)
`“*B,
`A copy from a