throbber
doi:10.1006/mthe.2002.0639, available online at http://www.idealibrary.com on IDEAL
`
`TRIAL
`
`Evidence of CFTR Function in Cystic Fibrosis after
`Systemic Administration of 4-Phenylbutyrate
`Pamela L. Zeitlin,1,* Marie Diener-West,3 Ronald C. Rubenstein,5 Michael P. Boyle,2
`Carlton K. K. Lee,4 and Lois Brass-Ernst1
`
`Departments of 1Pediatrics and 2Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 3Department of Biostatistics,
`Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, and 4Department of Pharmacy, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland, 21287 USA
`5Division of Pulmonary Medicine, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, and Department of Pediatrics,
`University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, USA
`
`*To whom correspondence and reprint requests should be addressed. Fax: 410-955-1030. E-mail: pzeitli@jhmi.edu.
`
`Most individuals with cystic fibrosis (CF) carry one or two mutations that result in a matura-
`tion defect of the full-length protein. One such mutation, ⌬F508, results in a mutant membrane
`glycoprotein that fails to progress to the apical membrane, where the wild-type protein
`normally functions as a cyclic AMP-regulated chloride channel. 4-Phenylbutyrate (Buphenyl),
`an orally bioavailable short chain fatty acid, modulates heat shock protein expression and
`restores maturation of the ⌬F508 protein in vitro and in vivo. We performed a randomized,
`double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-escalation and safety study of Buphenyl in 19 adults with
`CF (homozygous ⌬F508) to test the hypothesis that Buphenyl would be safe, well-tolerated,
`and associated with an increase in chloride transport in nasal epithelia. Three dose levels (20,
`30, or 40 g divided t.i.d.) of drug or placebo were given for 1 week. Serial measurements of
`chloride transport by nasal potential difference (NPD) testing and metabolic safety testing were
`performed. A maximum tolerated dose of 20 g was defined based on minimal adverse
`reactions, the safety profile, and a statistically significant induction of chloride transport that
`was maximal by day 3. This short-term phase I/II study demonstrates proof of principle that
`modulation of ⌬F508 CFTR biosynthesis and trafficking is a viable therapeutic approach for
`cystic fibrosis.
`
`Key Words: butyrates, clinical trial, cystic fibrosis, mutation, chloride,
`sodium, sweating, CFTR, ⌬F508, Buphenyl
`
`INTRODUCTION
`The ⌬F508 CFTR mutation results in a mutant membrane
`glycoprotein that fails to progress to the apical membrane,
`where the wild-type protein normally functions as a cyclic
`AMP-regulated chloride channel [1,2]. Instead, the major-
`ity of nascent ⌬F508 CFTR molecules becomes ubiquiti-
`nated and rapidly degraded from the endoplasmic reticu-
`lum [3]. More efficient folding and maturation of ⌬F508
`CFTR can be induced by high concentrations of glycerol
`[4] or by protein assembly at 27⬚C [5,6]. Both HSP70 and
`HSC70, distinct members of the 70 kDa heat shock pro-
`tein family, interact with CFTR, and regulation of these
`heat shock protein–CFTR interactions can restore ⌬F508
`CFTR trafficking [7,8]. We recently demonstrated that 4-
`phenylbutyrate (Buphenyl), an orally bioavailable short
`chain fatty acid, modulates heat shock protein function
`and restores ⌬F508 maturation in vitro and in vivo [7–9]. It
`is not known whether restoration of ⌬F508 CFTR to the
`
`plasma membrane will be sufficient to reverse cystic fibro-
`sis (CF) disease.
`We performed a randomized, double-blind, placebo-
`controlled, dose-escalation, and safety study of Buphenyl
`in 19 adults with CF (homozygous ⌬F508). We hypothe-
`sized that Buphenyl would be safe, well-tolerated, and
`associated with a gain in chloride transport in nasal epithe-
`lia as quantified by nasal potential difference (NPD) test-
`ing. Drug or placebo was administered in three oral dose
`levels (20, 30, or 40 g) divided thrice daily (t.i.d.) for 1
`week. Serial measurements of NPD, sweat electrolyte con-
`centration, metabolic and hepatic function, pulmonary
`function, and sputum microbiology were performed dur-
`ing the study period and during a 1 month washout
`period. Pharmacokinetics were evaluated during the first
`72 hours of study drug administration and will be reported
`separately.
`
`MOLECULAR THERAPY Vol. 6, No. 1, July 2002
`Copyright © The American Society of Gene Therapy
`1525-0016/02 $35.00
`
`119
`
`LUPIN EX. 1012
`
`

`

`TRIAL
`
`doi:10.1006/mthe.2002.0639, available online at http://www.idealibrary.com on IDEAL
`
`RESULTS
`
`Demographics
`There were 12 men and 7 women randomized in the study,
`and all 19 completed the final study visit. Mean age ± SD
`was 28.5 years ± 7.1, average weight was 62.6 kg ± 7.1, and
`average FEV1 (% predicted) was 63.7 ± 17.0. There were no
`significant differences in gender, baseline age, weight, or
`FEV1 among participants in the four groups (Kruskal–Wallis
`test, P > 0.25 for each comparison).
`
`FIG. 1. Baseline NPD. Baseline NPD was recorded on day 0 during superfu-
`sion of Ringer’s solution (triangle = median).
`
`Nasal Epithelial Chloride Transport
`NPD measurements were performed separately in the right
`and left nares. Several subjects presented with inflammation
`and tenderness on one side and NPD was not performed on
`that side if it was painful. Bilateral testing was resumed
`when the symptoms subsided. The baseline NPD did not dif-
`fer between groups (Fig. 1). The means and standard devi-
`ations of the baseline sodium and chloride responses in
`each study group (Table 1) were comparable to data
`obtained in CF subjects in the Cystic Fibrosis Therapeutics
`Development Network (M.P.B. et al., manuscript submit-
`ted), and there were no statistically significant differences
`in these baseline parameters between groups. In CF, the
`basal NPD is determined by the sodium potential which is
`unchecked (< –30 mV) in the absence of functional CFTR.
`Of the intended 38 measured basal NPDs, one naris in each
`of three subjects was too painful to allow measurement at
`the baseline. The baseline NPD was more positive than
`expected (–13 to –25) in 5 of 35 nares. This was due to tech-
`nical difficulties related to patient reports of tenderness at
`the desired point of catheter placement. Although in those
`cases the catheter was repositioned for patient comfort and
`may not have represented the ideal site, these values were
`retained in the analysis. Average baseline NPD was similar
`across groups and indicative of CF.
`The aggregate data for the measured low chloride/iso-
`proterenol response over time of the placebo (Fig. 2A), 20
`g (Fig. 2B), and 30 g (Fig. 2C) cohorts were assessed sepa-
`rately by group. No change was observed for the placebo
`group during the first 7 days. In contrast the low chlo-
`ride/isoproterenol responses increased at days 2, 3, 4, and
`7, respectively, for the 20 g (Fig. 2B) and 30 g (Fig. 2C)
`cohorts. The primary outcome variable, the change in the
`low chloride/isoproterenol response from baseline levels
`on each study day, was then compared across groups for
`days 2 (Fig. 3A), 3 (Fig. 3B), 4 (Fig. 3C), and 7 (Fig. 3D). A
`statistically significant induction of chloride transport
`potentials was observed in a dose-dependent relationship
`on day 3 (Fig. 3B), but this difference diminished by day
`4 (Fig. 3C). The mean difference in low chloride/isopro-
`terenol change between the 20 g cohort and the control
`group was –2.2 mV (95% confidence interval (CI): –10.1,
`
`Adverse Events
`As in our previous study, minor adverse events in the 20
`g cohort included transient nausea, headache, and sleepi-
`ness after the initial dose, and body odor. The first three
`resolved with a dose of Tylenol, and hydration was encour-
`aged. Body odor was an inconsistent complaint by family
`or friends of subjects. No dose adjustments were required.
`These complaints were also observed after the initial dose
`in the 30 g cohort. Several subjects reported visual distur-
`bances that were transient after the first dose. One subject
`had severe headache that resolved with a reduction to 20
`g daily. All three subjects in the 40 g cohort complained
`of nausea, headache, and visual disturbances, and one
`complained of cramps in the hands and fingers. One of
`these subjects tolerated 40 g of Buphenyl when it was
`divided into six daily doses. One tolerated a reduction to
`30 g daily, and one subject found the symptoms to be so
`unpleasant that the drug had to be discontinued. The data
`and safety monitoring committee
`was convened to review the
`adverse event profile and recom-
`mended termination of the 40 g
`cohort. Although the maximum
`tolerated dose was 30 g daily, the
`number of tablets necessary and
`the side effect profile, as well as
`the physiologic outcome, suggest
`that the practical daily dose is 20
`g daily divided t.i.d.
`
`Group
`
`n
`
`Amiloride
`inhibition (mV)
`22.3 (9.7)
`7
`Control
`23.9 (9.1)
`11
`20 g
`25.4 (14.6)
`11
`30 g
`27.2 (7.8)
`6
`40 g
`Data are expressed as mean (SD).
`
`TABLE 1: Basal NPD parameters
`Low chloride
`Isoproterenol
`response (mV)
`response (mV)
`3.9 (4.3)
`0.1 (1.6)
`4.4 (7.2)
`3 (2.0)
`4.5 (6.8)
`1.4 (2.9)
`–2 (4.1)
`3.7 (4.6)
`
`Low chloride/isoproterenol
`response (mV)
`4 (4.2)
`7.5 (8.0)
`5.9 (5.7)
`1.7 (5.5)
`
`120
`
`MOLECULAR THERAPY Vol. 6, No. 1, July 2002
`Copyright © The American Society of Gene Therapy
`
`LUPIN EX. 1012
`
`

`

`doi:10.1006/mthe.2002.0639, available online at http://www.idealibrary.com on IDEAL
`
`TRIAL
`
`A
`
`C
`
`5.8) and –11.9 mV (95% CI: –18.9, –5.0) on days 2 and 3,
`respectively. This difference decreased to –1.8 mV (95% CI:
`–10.0, 6.3) by day 4. A similar trend was observed in the
`comparison of the low chloride/isoproterenol change
`between the 30 g cohort and the control group from base-
`line to day 2 (–5.0 mV (95% CI: –14.3, –4.2)) and to day
`3 (–6.3 mV (95% CI: –16.7, 4.1)).
`Analysis of the isoproterenol response alone, without
`the previous low chloride maneuver, revealed the same
`patterns. A statistically significant, dose-dependent
`improvement of isoproterenol-stimulated chloride trans-
`port was observed on days 2 and 3, but this difference
`diminished by day 4. The mean difference in isoproterenol
`change between the 20 g cohort and the control group was
`–5.6 mV (95% CI: –10.2, –0.9) and –6.2 mV (95% CI: –12.1,
`–0.3) on days 2 and 3, respectively. This difference
`decreased to –2.8 mV (95% CI: –10.3, 4.7) by day 4. A sim-
`ilar trend was observed in the comparison of the difference
`in isoproterenol change on day 2 between the 30 g cohort
`and the control group (–5.6 mV (95% CI: –9.4, –1.7))
`although the difference was not statistically significant by
`day 3 (–2.6 mV (95% CI: –8.9, 3.7)).
`
`B
`
`FIG. 2 Nasal epithelial chloride transport during treatment and washout peri-
`ods. Individual data points representing the low chloride/isoproterenol
`responses at each study date during treatment are recorded by +. (A) Control
`group; (B) 20 g cohort; (C) 30 g cohort. Note that the induction of chloride
`transport in the phenylbutyrate treated cohorts is indicated by negative val-
`ues crossing below the zero line.
`
`There was no statistically significant change from base-
`line in the amiloride-inhibited potential at any time point
`(data not shown). Thus, induction of chloride transport
`was not accompanied by inhibition of amiloride-regulated
`sodium transport as would be predicted for full correction
`of CFTR function. One example of a robust induction of
`chloride transport in an individual in the 30 g cohort on
`day 3 is shown (Fig. 4A). This NPD measurement tracing
`demonstrates the persistently high basal level of NPD in
`spite of normal levels of chloride transport, which again
`suggests that induction of chloride transport has no sig-
`nificant effect on amiloride-regulated sodium transport.
`Urine and plasma collected on day 7 demonstrated the
`presence of study drug metabolite in all treated subjects
`and not in controls. Phenylbutyrate was efficiently con-
`verted to phenylacetate and excreted in the urine as
`phenacetylglutamine in the 20 g cohort. Increasing the
`dose by 33% from 20 g to 30 g daily was associated with
`a doubling in the AUC24 (11.9 ± 5.9 and 22.6 ± 5.0 mm*h).
`Examples of the plasma phenylbutyrate (Fig. 4B) and
`phenylacetate (Fig. 4C) profiles for the same subject dis-
`played in Fig. 4A are given. These graphs demonstrate the
`three expected daily peaks in phenylbutyrate concentra-
`tion and more sustained levels of the first metabolite dur-
`ing the waking hours.
`Accumulation of phenylacetate in the plasma was
`observed in one individual in the 30 g cohort. This sug-
`gests that in this subject, phenylbutyrate may have satu-
`rated the metabolic pathway to conversion to phenacetyl-
`glutamine, thus suggesting a maximum tolerated dose of
`20 g daily.
`
`MOLECULAR THERAPY Vol. 6, No. 1, July 2002
`Copyright © The American Society of Gene Therapy
`
`121
`
`LUPIN EX. 1012
`
`

`

`TRIAL
`
`doi:10.1006/mthe.2002.0639, available online at http://www.idealibrary.com on IDEAL
`
`A
`
`C
`
`B
`
`D
`
`FIG. 3. Change from baseline in nasal epithelial chloride transport (triangle = median). Nasal epithelial chloride transport was measured on day 2 (A), day 3 (B),
`day 4 (C), and day 7 (D). Days 2 and 3 resulted in maximal inductions of chloride transport for 20 and 30 g cohorts.
`
`Sweat Electrolytes
`Although several individuals exhibited a decrease in sweat
`chloride while taking the study drug with restoration of
`pre-drug values during the washout, there was significant
`inter-subject variability and no statistically significant dif-
`ference for the groups as a whole (Table 2).
`
`Hepatic Enzymes
`One subject had an isolated elevation in alkaline phos-
`phatase at baseline which persisted. There was a trend
`toward reduction in alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and
`aspartate aminotransferase (AST) in the 20 g and 30 g
`cohorts and a statistically significant drop in total biliru-
`bin by day 7 for the 30 g cohort (Table 2).
`
`Uric Acid
`Uric acids levels became mildly elevated while on study
`drug in the 30 g cohort and returned to baseline levels
`
`during the washout period (Table 2). Phenacetyl-
`glutamine and urate may compete for the same trans-
`porter in the kidney.
`
`Pulmonary Function Test
`There was no statistically significant difference from base-
`line in FEV1 levels beetween groups, according to meas-
`urements made on day 0, 3, 4, or 7 within each group.
`
`Microbiology
`Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus were
`scored semi-quantitatively at baseline and day 7 using a
`Likert scale from 0 (none) to 6 (heavy). Median score for
`P. aeruginosa at baseline was 4.5 in the controls, 2 in the
`20 g cohort, and 5 in the 30 g cohort. There were no sta-
`tistically significant differences in these scores at the base-
`line measurement between groups or between baseline
`and day 7 within each group.
`
`122
`
`MOLECULAR THERAPY Vol. 6, No. 1, July 2002
`Copyright © The American Society of Gene Therapy
`
`LUPIN EX. 1012
`
`

`

`doi:10.1006/mthe.2002.0639, available online at http://www.idealibrary.com on IDEAL
`
`TRIAL
`
`A
`
`B
`
`C
`
`DISCUSSION
`
`Magnitude of Chloride Response in
`CF Nasal Epithelia
`The combined low chloride/isoproterenol response in the
`NPD test has been recognized to be the most discrimina-
`tory measure of CFTR dysfunction and cystic fibrosis [10].
`Homozygous ⌬F508 subjects (uniformly pancreatic insuf-
`ficient) would be expected to have negligible, or at most,
`extremely low chloride responses (< –5 mV low
`
`FIG. 4. Example of a NPD in a subject taking 30 g phenylbutyrate
`daily for 3 days. (A) NPD. (B) Plasma phenylbutyrate levels for
`study days 1–3. (C) Plasma phenylacetate levels for study days
`1–3.
`
`chloride/isoproterenol responses). CF can be
`associated with slightly higher or intermediate
`levels of low chloride/isoproterenol response,
`particularly in the setting of one or more pan-
`creatic sufficient mutations [11–14]. In our
`study, restoration of the ⌬F508 CFTR to the
`plasma membrane may have been associated
`with a sub-maximal response because this muta-
`tion carries a shorter open time and lower con-
`ductance than wild-type CFTR [15]. We had previously
`observed, in subjects of this genotype taking 19 g daily
`who participated in a pilot study, a modest improvement
`of low chloride/isoproterenol response [8]. In the present
`study, a dose escalation was undertaken to attempt to
`increase the low chloride/isoproterenol response above
`what we observed in our first pilot clinical trial using 19
`g daily. Whereas some subjects achieved low chloride/iso-
`proterenol responses approaching normal values, others
`did not. Our results suggest additional genes or individ-
`ual variation in pharmacokinetics may play a role in the
`response, but that on average, we have achieved a maxi-
`mal response using 20 g daily. Our data also indicate that
`there was no additional advantage to taking 30 g daily.
`We observed peak improvement of the low chlo-
`ride/isoproterenol response between 3 and 4 days,
`depending on the dose, and a slight diminution in this
`response by day 7 in all dose groups. While the molecu-
`lar detail of this observation is not known, two potential
`explanations are supported by published observations.
`Both Linsdell [16], in single channel recordings, and
`Loffing et al. [17], in Calu-3 cells, observed inhibition of
`CFTR-mediated Cl– transport with millimolar concentra-
`tions of 4-phenylbutyrate (4PBA), suggesting direct inhi-
`bition of the channel by 4PBA. Inhibition of CFTR by
`4PBA in single channel recordings was only observed with
`application of 4PBA to the cytoplasmic face of the chan-
`nel, and not with application of 4PBA to the extracellu-
`lar face. For this mechanism to apply in vivo, a significant
`and sustained intracellular accumulation of Buphenyl at
`millimolar concentrations would need to occur. Only
`transient plasma concentrations of Buphenyl greater than
`1 mM (Fig. 4B) are observed. Rapid metabolism of
`Buphenyl is also observed in patients with urea cycle dis-
`orders, and our pharmacokinetic data (reported else-
`where), reporting quantitative conversion of Buphenyl to
`phenylacetate and phenacetylglutamine before excretion
`in the urine, argues against such a mechanism.
`Furthermore, patients with urea cycle disorders who have
`taken Buphenyl daily for many years have not developed
`lung disease, bronchiectasis, or phenotypic features of CF
`(Saul Brusilow, April 2002, pers. comm.).
`
`MOLECULAR THERAPY Vol. 6, No. 1, July 2002
`Copyright © The American Society of Gene Therapy
`
`123
`
`LUPIN EX. 1012
`
`

`

`TRIAL
`
`Test
`Sweat chloride
`– baseline
`- Day 2
`- Day 3
`- Day 4
`- Day 7
`
`Uric acid –
`baseline
`- Day 2
`- Day 3
`- Day 4
`- Day 7
`
`AST – baseline
`- Day 2
`- Day 3
`- Day 4
`- Day 7
`
`ALT – baseline
`- Day 2
`- Day 3
`- Day 4
`- Day 7
`
`TABLE 2: Secondary outcome measures
`Control
`20 g
`Mean (SD)
`Mean (SD)
`110.1 (16.6)
`119.2 (12.7)
`
`119.2 (7.4)
`113.6 (13.6)
`111.0 (8.7)
`117.2 (10.3)
`
`119.8 (10.4)
`117.2 (9.0)
`116.2 (9.9)
`116.5 (10.7)
`
`6.3 (1.0)
`
`6.3 (2.0)
`6.0 (1.4)
`5.9 (1.4)
`5.7 (1.6)
`
`45.0 (41.0)
`27.5 (13.2)
`29.2 (13.8)
`47.0 (34.0)
`59.0 (55.2)
`
`49.5 (42.5)
`40.0 (33.4)
`41.2 (30.0)
`56.2 (52.8)
`81.5 (78.5)
`
`5.6 (1.8)
`
`6.7 (1.9)
`6.6 (1.6)
`6.8 (1.6)
`7.4 (2.0)
`
`23.5 (3.0)
`20.2 (4.5)
`19.2 (3.1)*
`19.5 (3.7)*
`22.4 (6.3)
`
`28.5 (14.4)
`23.7 (7.1)
`21.0 (7.7)*
`19.2 (4.4)*
`19.4 (5.9)*
`
`30 g
`Mean (SD)
`116.8 (16.8)
`
`96.2 (45.3)
`121.1 (13.5)
`110.3 (16.2)
`119.8 (4.4)
`
`6.8 (0.9)
`
`8.7 (1.7)*
`9.4 (2.5)*
`8.9 (2.6)
`8.6 (2.1)
`
`28.3 (8.1)
`27.2 (8.2)
`23.0 (8.5)
`38.0 (39.9)
`33.7 (18.6)
`
`35.0 (14.5)
`32.6 (21.5)
`26.2 (18.5)*
`25.7 (15.1)*
`42.5 (74.8)
`
`238.2 (209.8)
`
`98.2 (32.9)
`
`162.8 (67.8)
`
`Alkaline phosphatase –
`baseline
`- Day 2
`- Day 3
`- Day 4
`- Day 7
`
`Total bilirubin –
`baseline
`- Day 2
`- Day 3
`- Day 4
`- Day 7
`
`228.0 (203.8)
`221.2 (194.4)
`216.0 (190.7)
`353.5 (277.9)
`
`102.8 (41.4)
`95.5 (35.2)
`92.0 (32.4)
`96.0 (15.0)
`
`0.5 (0.3)
`
`0.5 (0.2)
`0.4 (0.2)
`0.5 (0.1)
`0.4 (0.1)
`
`0.6 (0.4)
`
`0.8 (0.7)*
`0.7 (0.4)*
`0.6 (0.3)
`0.5 (0.2)
`
`*Significant change from baseline, P < 0.05.
`
`We favor a second possible explanation for the
`diminution of the low chloride/isoproterenol response
`between 4 and 7 days, namely that the cell adapts to the
`perturbation of cellular homeostasis caused by Buphenyl
`that initially improved ⌬F508 trafficking. Such adapta-
`
`doi:10.1006/mthe.2002.0639, available online at http://www.idealibrary.com on IDEAL
`
`tion returns the cell closer to its base-
`line condition in which ⌬F508 traffick-
`ing is aberrant. Such a mechanism is
`consistent with
`suggestions
`that
`Buphenyl alters molecular chaperone
`expression and interaction with ⌬F508
`[7,18] and causes a more global cellular
`adaptation, one element of which is
`increased turnover of HSC70 mRNA
`[19]. Such global effects on the cell may
`result from Buphenyl’s action as an
`inhibitor of histone deacetylase [20]
`and are also consistent with a long-
`term loss of Buphenyl’s effect on
`increased hemoglobin F (HbF) expres-
`sion in patients with ␤-hemoglo-
`binopathies.
`Upregulation of these intermediate
`levels of chloride transport was not asso-
`ciated with a reduction in the basal NPD
`nor with a reduction in the amiloride
`response, although the presence of func-
`tional ⌬F508 in the plasma membrane
`might have been expected to downreg-
`ulate the epithelial sodium channel [21].
`Because
`some members of
`the
`isoflavonoid family have been shown to
`activate chloride conductance through
`CFTR, it may be possible to increase
`⌬F508-mediated chloride transport by
`adding molecules that increase CFTR
`open time, decrease CFTR closed time,
`or prolong CFTR residence in the plasma
`membrane by inhibiting recycling.
`Perhaps full activation of ⌬F508-medi-
`ated chloride transport would downreg-
`ulate basal NPD and amiloride-inhibited
`sodium transport, as is suggested by
`Suaud et al. [22].
`
`149.6 (65.3)*
`147.0 (63.3)*
`120.8 (58.1)*
`144.5 (74.8)
`
`0.5 (0.2)
`
`0.5 (0.2)
`0.4 (0.2)
`0.7 (0.7)
`0.3 (0.1)*
`
`Systemic Administration
`The ability to administer a butyrate
`through the gastrointestinal tract is a
`distinct advantage, because CF is a sys-
`temic disorder of exocrine glands and
`secretory epithelia. Sinusitis, pancreati-
`tis, biliary tract disease, hepatitis, meco-
`nium ileus equivalent, and sweat losses
`leading to dehydration should theoreti-
`cally respond to restoration of ⌬F508
`CFTR trafficking. Our study was not suf-
`ficiently powerful statistically to detect a difference in the
`secondary outcomes of sweat electrolytes, hepatic
`enzymes, or FEV1 of subjects. Importantly, we did not
`observe an apparent worsening of any of these measures
`during phenylbutyrate treatment.
`
`124
`
`MOLECULAR THERAPY Vol. 6, No. 1, July 2002
`Copyright © The American Society of Gene Therapy
`
`LUPIN EX. 1012
`
`

`

`doi:10.1006/mthe.2002.0639, available online at http://www.idealibrary.com on IDEAL
`
`TRIAL
`
`Tolerability
`Phenylbutyrate is approved for infants, children, and
`adults with urea cycle disorders that lead to accumulation
`of nitrogen in the form of ammonia. Therapy must be
`daily and lifelong. In general, it is well-tolerated and asso-
`ciated with improvements in ammonia and liver function.
`Phenylbutyrate also has been tested in phase I and II clin-
`ical trials for a variety of solid tumors [23]. Some subjects
`have remained on extremely high doses of the drug for
`more than a year. Side effects are similar to the ones
`observed in our trial—mainly headache and nausea.
`Phenylbutyrate also has undergone testing in the hemo-
`globinopathies [24,25]. The therapy is pulsatile and life-
`long. Identification of the appropriate dosage regimen for
`CF as well as potential synergy with channel activators
`should be explored.
`
`Genetics
`Upregulation of cellular ⌬F508 CFTR protein is desirable
`because the disease results from a deficiency of CFTR
`beyond the endoplasmic reticulum. Upregulation of
`other mutations which create a partially functional CFTR
`is also a desirable goal. Presumably a larger fraction of
`modestly impaired CFTR proteins in the plasma
`membrane would still improve salt and water balance
`across the epithelium overall. Phenylbutyrate has not
`been tested with any of the additional > 900 mutations
`seen in CF.
`
`Applicability in Other Inherited Disorders
`The ⌬F508 CFTR is prematurely degraded from the endo-
`plasmic reticulum. Accumulation of undigested, mis-
`folded CFTR in vacuoles retrieved from the endoplasmic
`reticulum is not a key feature of CF. The zz genotype of
`␣
`1anti-trypsin (␣
`1AT) deficiency produces a misfolded
`␣
`1AT that is accumulated in the hepatocyte, the cell of
`origin, causing progressive cirrhosis in a subgroup of
`patients. The chaperones involved in ␣
`1AT biogenesis are
`similar to those involved in CFTR processing. We have
`implicated butyrate-mediated changes in HSC70–CFTR
`and HSP70–CFTR complexes as key events in the upreg-
`ulation of CFTR and chloride transport. Similar mecha-
`nisms may account for zz ␣
`1AT secretion in the murine
`model [26]. Phenylbutyrate may therefore be helpful to
`the
`subset of CF
`subjects presenting with
`significant liver involvement.
`
`METHODS
`Human subjects. Patients of both genders with CF who were homozy-
`gous ⌬F508 genotype and ±18 years of age were eligible to participate.
`Exclusion criteria included pregnancy or inability to practice birth con-
`trol, breast-feeding, clinically significant liver disease, 24-hour oxygen
`therapy, acute upper respiratory infection, acute pulmonary exacerba-
`tion, and sinus surgery within 6 weeks or intravenous administration of
`antibiotics within 4 weeks of the start of the trial. All subjects signed
`informed consent forms. The study protocol and consent forms were
`
`approved by the Joint Committee on Clinical Investigation of the Johns
`Hopkins School of Medicine (IRB).
`Nineteen subjects entered the study and were randomized. The study
`drug was discontinued in one female subject from the 30 g cohort who
`experienced acute distal intestinal obstruction syndrome on day 2, and this
`subject was replaced by another subject. Due to unpleasant symptoms,
`three subjects required a dose reduction; two subjects from the 30 g cohort
`were reduced to 20 g and one from the 40 g cohort was reduced to 30 g
`daily. One subject in the 40 g cohort elected to discontinue use of the
`study drug due to intolerable symptoms. Randomization in the 40 g cohort
`was discontinued at the request of the data and safety monitoring com-
`mittee after the third subject experienced unacceptable symptoms. This
`resulted in six subjects randomized to 20 g, six randomized to 30 g, three
`randomized to 40 g, and four randomized to placebo. All subjects com-
`pleted the final visit.
`Study design. A randomized, double-blind, dose-escalation design was
`used. Subjects were randomized in a 3:1 fashion to either the study drug
`or placebo. The designed study included eight subjects randomized at each
`of three sequential dose levels resulting in six subjects per dose cohort and
`six subjects in the placebo group. Escalation to the subsequent dose level
`proceeded unless unacceptable toxicity was observed. The primary out-
`come was the change in NPD between the baseline measurement and meas-
`urements taken on day X of study drug administration. A sample size of
`six subjects per group was planned with a power of 0.80 and a two-sided
`significance level of 0.05 to detect a difference in mean change in NPD of
`5 mV between drug and placebo, assuming a standard deviation of the
`change of 1.1 mV in placebo and 2.9 mV in drug. These estimates were
`based on our previous investigation of the isoproterenol/low chloride
`response in homozygous ⌬F508 subjects [8]. Secondary outcomes included
`changes in metabolic and hepatic function, pulmonary function, sputum
`microbiology and pharmacokinetics.
`Study drug and placebo. Buphenyl (sodium salt of 4-phenylbutyrate) in
`a 500 mg tablet was provided by Medicis Pharmaceutical Inc. A sodium lac-
`tate placebo tablet was formulated to maintain equivalent sodium salt load
`by Medicis Pharmaceutical Inc. A “no added salt” diet was prescribed for
`the duration of study drug administration. The 20 g daily dose was divided
`into 13 tablets to be taken at 8 AM and at 2 PM and 14 tablets to be taken
`at 8 PM. The 30 g daily dose was divided into 20 tablets to be taken at 8
`AM, at 2PM, and at 8 PM. The 40 g daily dose was first prescribed as 27
`tablets to be taken at 8 AM and at 2 PM and 26 tablets to be taken at 8 PM.
`This latter schedule proved unpleasant, and the doses were then divided
`into 14 tablets to be taken at 8 AM, 13 tablets to be taken at 11 AM, 14
`tablets to be taken at 2 PM, and 13 tablets to be taken at 5 PM, at 8 PM,
`and at 11 PM. The dose was tolerated better when administered with food.
`Hydration, either by the oral route or through the intravenous line used
`for blood sampling, was associated with fewer symptoms of nausea and
`headache, which resolved in the first 24 hours.
`Study protocol. Subjects were admitted to the Johns Hopkins Pediatric
`General Clinical Research Center (GCRC) for the first 4 days of study drug
`administration to monitor safety, to obtain frequent blood sampling and 24
`hour urine collection to evaluate the pharmacokinetics, and to perform daily
`measurements of CFTR function. Routine safety tests consisted of measure-
`ment of hematologic indices, prothrombin time (PT) and partial thrombo-
`plastin time (PTT), hepatic function, urinalysis, spirometry, and electrolyte
`and uric acid levels. Blood sampling through a heparin lock or midline
`catheter was obtained at 0, 1, 2, 4, 6, and 8 hours post-dose on days 1, 2,
`and 3. Twenty-four hour urine collections were conducted on days 1, 2, and
`3. Sputum was collected at baseline, on day 7, and weekly during the remain-
`der of the protocol (1 month washout period). Sweat chlorides were meas-
`ured in the Johns Hopkins Hospital chemistry lab on sweat collected by pilo-
`carpine electrophoresis from equivalent sites on each forearm at baseline, and
`on days 2, 3, 4, and 7, and at weekly intervals during the washout period.
`NPD testing as described [8] (with minor modifications) was performed in
`both nares at baseline, on days 2, 3, 4, and 7, and weekly during the washout
`period. Testing was performed with room temperature solutions, Ringer’s
`solution instead of an agar bridge for the subcutaneous electrode, and com-
`puter-based data acquisition for the last 5 patients.
`
`MOLECULAR THERAPY Vol. 6, No. 1, July 2002
`Copyright © The American Society of Gene Therapy
`
`125
`
`LUPIN EX. 1012
`
`

`

`TRIAL
`
`doi:10.1006/mthe.2002.0639, available online at http://www.idealibrary.com on IDEAL
`
`Analysis of metabolites by HPLC. Plasma (0.1 ml) was treated with 0.3
`ml methanol containing 0.1 mM benzoyl glycine methyl ester as an inter-
`nal standard. After 3 minutes at room temperature, this sample was cen-
`trifuged in a microfuge at top speed for 5 minutes. The supernatant was
`analyzed for metabolites. Urine (0.25 ml) was prepared with 0.75 ml
`methanol containing the standard. A 1:25 dilution (volume:volume) of
`the supernatant was analyzed on a Waters Alliance system using a Waters
`C18 Bondapak column, 3.9 mm ⫻ 300 mm. The column temperature was
`maintained at 40⬚C, and the flow rate was 1.5 ml/min. The mobile phase
`consisted of (A) 1 mM phosphate, pH 3; (B) methanol; and (C) 1 mM phos-
`phate, pH 4. Phenylbutyrate, phenylacetate, and phenacetylglutamine were
`resolved and quantified by A220 measurement.
`Statistical methods. Data were graphically displayed with exploratory
`techniques including dot plots and box and whisker plots. Differences in
`baseline characteristics between groups were assessed using the
`Kruskal–Wallis nonparametric analysis of variance method [27]. Changes
`in NPD, between baseline and treatment day within groups, were initially
`assessed using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test [27]. Changes in NPD over
`time were analyzed by a regression approach using a robust estimate of vari-
`ance to adjust for the correlation between measures on different nares of
`the same individual [28].
`
`ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
`P.L.Z. was supported by Cystic Fibrosis Foundation grants ZEITLI97A0, P01 HL
`51811, and NCRR RR00052 for this work. M.D.W. received support from the Cystic
`Fibrosis Foundation. R.C.R. was supported by Cystic Fibrosis Foundation grant
`RUBENS96LO. M.P.B. was supported by a Cystic Fibrosis Foundation Shw/achman
`Award. A licensing agreement exists among the Johns Hopkins University, Ucyclyd
`Pharma, Inc. (Medicis), and P.L.Z. The terms of this arrangement are being man-
`aged by the University in accordance with its conflict of interest policies.
`
`RECEIVED FOR PUBLICATION FEBRUARY 20; ACCEPTED MAY 8, 2002.
`
`3.
`
`REFERENCES
`1. Kartner, N., Augustinas, O., Jensen, T. J., Naismith, A. L., and Riordan, J. R. (1992).
`Mislocalization of ⌬F508 CFTR in cystic fibrosis sweat gland. Nat. Genet. 1: 321–327.
`2. Cheng, S. H., et al. (1990). Defective intracellular transport and processing of CFTR is
`the molecular basis of most cystic fibrosis. Cell 63: 827–834.
`Jensen, T. J., et al. (1995). Multiple proteolytic systems, includin

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket