throbber
Trials@uspto.gov
`Tel: 571.272.7822
`
`
`Paper No. 15
`Entered: February 2, 2018
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`
`
`
`CANON INC., CANON U.S.A., INC., CANON FINANCIAL SERVICES,
`INC., NIKON CORPORATION, NIKON INC.,
`SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.,
`SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., SANYO ELECTRIC CO.,
`LTD.,
`Petitioner,
`v.
`PAPST LICENSING GMBH & CO. KG,
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`
`Case IPR2018-00410
`Patent 6,895,449 B2
`____________
`
`
`Before JONI Y. CHANG, JENNIFER S. BISK, and MIRIAM L. QUINN,
`Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`
`BISK, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`JUDGMENT
`Denying Inter Partes Review; Dismissing Motion for Joinder;
`Dismissing Motion to Waive or Suspend Rule 37 C.F.R. § 42.122
`37 C.F.R. §§ 42.108, 42.122
`
`

`

`IPR2018-00410
`Patent 6,895,449 B2
`
`
`INTRODUCTION
`On December 29, 2017, Petitioner, listed above, filed a Petition
`requesting inter partes review of claims 1–10, 12–13, and 15–18 of U.S.
`Patent No. 6,895,449 B2 (“the ’449 patent,” Ex. 1001). Paper 1 (“Pet.”).
`Petitioner concurrently filed a Motion for Joinder (Paper 5, “Mot.”), seeking
`to be joined to ZTE (USA) Inc. v Papst Licensing GMBH, Case No.
`IPR2017-00415 (the “ZTE IPR”). In addition, Petitioner filed a Motion to
`Waive or Suspend Rule 37 C.F.R. § 42.122. Paper 6 (“Mot. to Waive”).
`Patent Owner filed an opposition to both the Motion for Joinder (Paper 13,
`“Opp. Mot.”) and the Motion to Waive (Paper 14, “Opp. Mot. to Waive”).
`The due date for any Preliminary Response is not until April 10, 2018.
`Because the dismissal of both of Petitioner’s motions determines the
`outcome of the Petition in this case, we need not wait for Patent Owner’s
`response.
`For the reasons provided below, we dismiss both the Motion for
`Joinder and the Motion to Waive and deny the Petition.
`
`RELATED PROCEEDINGS
`The parties indicate that the ’449 patent has been asserted in cases
`taking place in several district courts. Pet. 3–4; Paper 12, 7. This patent has
`also been challenged in several other petitions for inter partes review. Pet. 3–
`4; Paper 12, 2–7.
`The ’449 patent is also the subject of the ZTE IPR. In that case, we
`instituted trial on May 17, 2017 (IPR2017-00415, Paper 8), but terminated it
`on January 18, 2018, because the parties settled their dispute (IPR2017-
`00415, Paper 32).
`
`2
`
`

`

`IPR2018-00410
`Patent 6,895,449 B2
`
`
`ANALYSIS
`A. Petitioner’s Motions are Moot
`Petitioner seeks joinder with the ZTE IPR. Mot. 1. The ZTE IPR has
`been terminated. See IPR2017-00415, Paper 32. Hence, there is no pending
`proceeding for Petitioner to join. Accordingly, we dismiss the Motion for
`Joinder as moot. Likewise, because the Motion to Waive or Suspend Rule
`37 C.F.R. § 42.122 requests waiver of the deadline for filing the Motion for
`Joinder (Mot. to Waive 1), it is also moot.
`
`B. The Petition is Time-Barred under 35 U.S.C. § 315(b)
`Section 315(b) bars institution of inter partes review when the petition
`is filed more than one year after the petitioner is served with a complaint
`alleging infringement of the patent. 35 U.S.C. § 315(b). There is no dispute
`that Petitioner was served with a complaint alleging infringement of the ’449
`patent more than one year before it filed its Petition. See Mot. 3–4; Mot. to
`Waive 2–4. The Petition, therefore, is statutorily barred, and no inter partes
`review may be instituted. 35 U.S.C. § 315(b).
`
`ORDER
`
`Accordingly, it is
`ORDERED that the Motion for Joinder is dismissed as moot;
`FURTHER ORDERED that the Motion to Waive or Suspend Rule 37
`C.F.R. § 42.122 is dismissed as moot; and
`FURTHER ORDERED that the Petition for inter partes review of
`claims 1–10, 12–13, and 15–18 of the ’449 patent is denied.
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`

`

`IPR2018-00410
`Patent 6,895,449 B2
`
`For PETITIONER:
`David Maiorana
`dmaiorana@jonesday.com
`
`Matthew Johnson
`mwjohnson@jonesday.com
`
`David Witcoff
`dlwitcoff@jonesday.com
`
`Marc Blackman
`msblackman@jonesday.com
`
`Carrie Beyer
`carrie.beyer@dbr.com
`
`Nikola Colic
`nick.colic@dbr.com
`
`Brian Rupp
`brian.rupp@dbr.com
`
`Mark Ungerman
`mungerman@ungermanip.com
`
`
`For PATENT OWNER:
`
`Gregory S. Donahue
`gdonahue@dpelaw.com
`
`Andrew DiNovo
`adinovo@dpelaw.com
`
`
`4
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket