`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`_______________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`_______________
`
`CANON INC., CANON U.S.A, INC.; CANON FINANCIAL
`SERVICES, INC.; NIKON CORPORATION; NIKON, INC.;
`SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.; SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS
`AMERICA, INC.; SANYO ELECTRIC CO., LTD.,
`Petitioners,
`
`v.
`
`PAPST LICENSING GMBH & CO., KG,
`Patent Owner.
`_______________
`
`Case IPR2018-00410
`Patent 6,895,449
`_______________
`
`
`MANDATORY NOTICES OF PATENT OWNER
`AND RELATED MATTERS
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`MANDATORY NOTICES UNDER 37 C.F.R. § 42.8(a)(1)
`
`
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.8, Patent Owner Papst Licensing GmbH & Co.,
`
`KG submits the following Mandatory Notices in response to the Petition for inter
`
`partes review of U.S. Patent No. 6,895,449.
`
`A.
`
`Real Party-In-Interest: The Patent Owner below is the real party-in-interest:
`
`Papst Licensing GmbH & Co., KG
`Bahnofstrasse 33
`78112 St. Georgen
`Germany
`
`Related Matters: The Patent Owner is aware of the following administrative
`
`
`
`B.
`
`and judicial matters that may affect, or be affected by, a decision in the present
`
`proceeding:
`
`Administrative matters:
`
`No.
`IPR2016-01199
`
`Caption
`Fujifilm Corporation et al. v. Papst
`Licensing GmbH & Co. KG
`
`Patent
`8,966,144
`
`IPR2016-01200
`
`Fujifilm Corporation et al. v. Papst
`Licensing GmbH & Co. KG
`
`8,504,746
`
`IPR2016-01202
`
`IPR2016-01206
`
`IPR2016-01211
`
`Canon Inc., Canon USA Inc., and Canon
`Financial Services, Inc. v. Papst
`Licensing GmbH & Co. KG
`Canon Inc., Canon USA Inc., and Canon
`Financial Services, Inc. v. Papst
`Licensing GmbH & Co. KG
`Canon Inc., Canon U.S.A., Inc., Canon
`Financial Services, Inc., Fujifilm
`Corporation, Fujifilm Holdings America
`Corporation, Fujifilm North America
`
`8,966,144
`
`8,504,746
`
`8,504,746
`
`Status
`Trial
`Instituted –
`Final Written
`Decision
`Trial
`Instituted –
`Final Written
`Decision
`Institution
`Denied
`
`Institution
`Denied
`
`Trial
`Instituted –
`Final Written
`Decision
`
`
`
`2
`
`

`

`Corporation, JVC Kenwood
`Corporation, JVC Kenwood USA
`Corporation, Nikon Corporation, Nikon
`Inc., Olympus Corporation, Olympus
`America Inc., Panasonic Corporation,
`Panasonic Corporation of North
`America, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
`and Samsung Electronics America, Inc.
`v. Papst Licensing GmbH & Co. KG
`Canon Inc., Canon U.S.A., Inc., Canon
`Financial Services, Inc., Fujifilm
`Corporation, Fujifilm Holdings America
`Corporation, Fujifilm North America
`Corporation, JVC Kenwood
`Corporation, JVC Kenwood USA
`Corporation, Nikon Corporation, Nikon
`Inc., Olympus Corporation, Olympus
`America Inc., Panasonic Corporation,
`Panasonic Corporation of North
`America, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
`and Samsung Electronics America, Inc.
`v. Papst Licensing GmbH & Co. KG
`Canon Inc., Canon U.S.A., Inc., Canon
`Financial Services, Inc., Fujifilm
`Corporation, Fujifilm Holdings America
`Corporation, Fujifilm North America
`Corporation, JVC Kenwood
`Corporation, JVC Kenwood USA
`Corporation, Nikon Corporation, Nikon
`Inc., Olympus Corporation, Olympus
`America Inc., Panasonic Corporation,
`Panasonic Corporation of North
`America, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
`and Samsung Electronics America, Inc.
`v. Papst Licensing GmbH & Co. KG
`Canon Inc., Canon U.S.A., Inc., Canon
`Financial Services, Inc., Fujifilm
`Corporation, Fujifilm Holdings America
`Corporation, Fujifilm North America
`Corporation, JVC Kenwood
`Corporation, JVC Kenwood USA
`Corporation, Nikon Corporation, Nikon
`Inc., Olympus Corporation, Olympus
`America Inc., Panasonic Corporation,
`Panasonic Corporation of North
`America, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
`
`3
`
`IPR2016-01212
`
`IPR2016-01213
`
`IPR2016-01214
`
`
`
`8,966,144
`
`Trial
`Instituted –
`Final Written
`Decision
`
`8,504,746
`
`Trial
`Instituted –
`Final Written
`Decision
`
`8,966,144
`
`Trial
`Instituted –
`Final Written
`Decision
`
`

`

`and Samsung Electronics America, Inc.
`v. Papst Licensing GmbH & Co. KG
`Canon Inc., Canon U.S.A., Inc., Canon
`Financial Services, Inc., Fujifilm
`Corporation, Fujifilm Holdings America
`Corporation, Fujifilm North America
`Corporation, JVC Kenwood
`Corporation, JVC Kenwood USA
`Corporation, Nikon Corporation, Nikon
`Inc., Olympus Corporation, Olympus
`America Inc., Panasonic Corporation,
`Panasonic Corporation of North
`America, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
`and Samsung Electronics America, Inc.
`v. Papst Licensing GmbH & Co. KG
`Canon Inc., Canon U.S.A., Inc., Canon
`Financial Services, Inc., Fujifilm
`Corporation, Fujifilm Holdings America
`Corporation, Fujifilm North America
`Corporation, JVC Kenwood
`Corporation, JVC Kenwood USA
`Corporation, Nikon Corporation, Nikon
`Inc., Olympus Corporation, Olympus
`America Inc., Panasonic Corporation,
`Panasonic Corporation of North
`America, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
`and Samsung Electronics America, Inc.
`v. Papst Licensing GmbH & Co. KG
`Canon Inc., Canon U.S.A., Inc., Canon
`Financial Services, Inc., Fujifilm
`Corporation, Fujifilm Holdings America
`Corporation, Fujifilm North America
`Corporation, JVC Kenwood
`Corporation, JVC Kenwood USA
`Corporation, Nikon Corporation, Nikon
`Inc., Olympus Corporation, Olympus
`America Inc., Panasonic Corporation,
`Panasonic Corporation of North
`America, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
`and Samsung Electronics America, Inc.
`v. Papst Licensing GmbH & Co. KG
`Canon Inc., Canon U.S.A., Inc., Canon
`Financial Services, Inc., Fujifilm
`Corporation, Fujifilm Holdings America
`Corporation, Fujifilm North America
`Corporation, JVC Kenwood
`
`4
`
`IPR2016-01216
`
`IPR2016-01222
`
`IPR2016-01223
`
`IPR2016-01224
`
`
`
`8,966,144
`
`Trial
`Instituted –
`Final Written
`Decision
`
`8,966,144
`
`Institution
`Denied
`
`8,504,746
`
`Institution
`Denied
`
`8,504,746
`
`Institution
`Denied
`
`

`

`Corporation, JVC Kenwood USA
`Corporation, Nikon Corporation, Nikon
`Inc., Olympus Corporation, Olympus
`America Inc., Panasonic Corporation,
`Panasonic Corporation of North
`America, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
`and Samsung Electronics America, Inc.
`v. Papst Licensing GmbH & Co. KG
`Canon Inc., Canon U.S.A., Inc., Canon
`Financial Services, Inc., Fujifilm
`Corporation, Fujifilm Holdings America
`Corporation, Fujifilm North America
`Corporation, JVC Kenwood
`Corporation, JVC Kenwood USA
`Corporation, Nikon Corporation, Nikon
`Inc., Olympus Corporation, Olympus
`America Inc., Panasonic Corporation,
`Panasonic Corporation of North
`America, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
`and Samsung Electronics America, Inc.
`v. Papst Licensing GmbH & Co. KG
`Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., and
`Samsung Electronics America, Inc. v.
`Papst Licensing GmbH & Co. KG
`Apple Inc. v. Papst Licensing GmbH &
`Co. KG
`Apple Inc. v. Papst Licensing GmbH &
`Co. KG
`Apple Inc. v. Papst Licensing GmbH &
`Co. KG
`Apple Inc. v. Papst Licensing GmbH &
`Co. KG
`Apple Inc. v. Papst Licensing GmbH &
`Co. KG
`Apple Inc. v. Papst Licensing GmbH &
`Co. KG
`Apple Inc. v. Papst Licensing GmbH &
`Co. KG
`Apple Inc. v. Papst Licensing GmbH &
`Co. KG
`Apple Inc. v. Papst Licensing GmbH &
`Co. KG
`Apple Inc. v. Papst Licensing GmbH &
`Co. KG
`Apple Inc. v. Papst Licensing GmbH &
`Co. KG
`
`5
`
`8,966,144
`
`Trial
`Instituted –
`Final Written
`Decision
`
`9,189,437
`
`6,470,399
`
`9,189,437
`
`9,189,437
`
`9,189,437
`
`6,470,399
`
`9,189,437
`
`8,966,144
`
`8,966,144
`
`8,504,746
`
`8,504,746
`
`6,470,399
`
`Trial
`Instituted
`
`Trial
`Instituted
`Institution
`Denied
`Institution
`Denied
`Trial
`Instituted
`Institution
`Denied
`Institution
`Denied
`Institution
`Denied
`Terminated
`
`Institution
`Denied
`Trial
`Instituted
`Trial
`Instituted
`
`IPR2016-01225
`
`IPR2016-01733
`
`IPR2016-01839
`
`IPR2016-01840
`
`IPR2016-01841
`
`IPR2016-01842
`
`IPR2016-01843
`
`IPR2016-01844
`
`IPR2016-01849
`
`IPR2016-01860
`
`IPR2016-01862
`
`IPR2016-01863
`
`IPR2016-01864
`
`
`
`

`

`IPR2017-00154
`
`IPR2017-00156
`
`IPR2017-00158
`
`IPR2017-00415
`
`IPR2017-00443
`
`IPR2017-00448
`
`IPR2017-00449
`
`IPR2017-00670
`
`IPR2017-00672
`
`IPR2017-00678
`
`IPR2017-00679
`
`IPR2017-00710
`
`IPR2017-00711
`
`IPR2017-00712
`
`IPR2017-00713
`
`IPR2017-00714
`
`IPR2017-01038
`
`IPR2017-01617
`
`IPR2017-01682
`
`IPR2017-01808
`
`Apple Inc. v. Papst Licensing GmbH &
`Co. KG
`Apple Inc. v. Papst Licensing GmbH &
`Co. KG
`Apple Inc. v. Papst Licensing GmbH &
`Co. KG
`Huawei Device Co., Ltd., LG
`Electronics, Inc., and ZTE (USA) Inc. v.
`Papst Licensing GmbH & Co. KG
`Huawei Device Co., Ltd., LG
`Electronics, Inc., and ZTE (USA) Inc. v.
`Papst Licensing GmbH & Co. KG
`Huawei Device Co., Ltd., LG
`Electronics, Inc., and ZTE (USA) Inc. v.
`Papst Licensing GmbH & Co. KG
`Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. v. Papst
`Licensing GmbH & Co. KG
`Apple Inc. v. Papst Licensing GmbH &
`Co. KG
`LG Electronics, Inc. v. Papst Licensing
`GmbH & Co. KG
`LG Electronics, Inc. v. Papst Licensing
`GmbH & Co. KG
`Apple Inc. v. Papst Licensing GmbH &
`Co. KG
`Huawei Device Co. Ltd. v. Papst
`Licensing GmbH & Co. KG
`ZTE (USA) Inc. v. Papst Licensing
`GmbH & Co. KG
`ZTE (USA) Inc. v. Papst Licensing
`GmbH & Co. KG
`ZTE (USA) Inc. v. Papst Licensing
`GmbH & Co. KG
`ZTE (USA) Inc. v. Papst Licensing
`GmbG & Co. KG
`LG Electronics, Inc. v. Papst Licensing
`GmbH & Co. KG
`Olympus Corporation and Olympus
`American Inc. v. Papst Licensing GmbH
`& Co. KG
`Olympus Corporation and Olympus
`America Inc. v. Papst Licensing GmbH
`& Co. KG
`Olympus Corporation, Olympus America
`Inc., Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., and
`
`8,966,144
`
`9,189,437
`
`8,504,746
`
`6,895,449
`
`Institution
`Denied
`Institution
`Denied
`Institution
`Denied
`Terminated
`
`6,470,399
`
`Terminated
`
`6,895,449
`
`8,504,746
`
`8,966,144
`
`Institution
`Denied
`
`Institution
`Denied
`Terminated
`
`8,966,144
`
`Terminated
`
`8,504,746
`
`Terminated
`
`8,966,144
`
`Terminated
`
`8,504,746
`
`Terminated
`
`8,966,144
`
`9,189,437
`
`6,895,449
`
`6,470,399
`
`9,189,437
`
`Institution
`Denied
`Institution
`Denied
`Terminated
`
`Trial
`Instituted
`Terminated
`
`6,895,449
`
`Terminated
`
`6,470,399
`
`Terminated
`
`6,470,399
`
`Trial
`Instituted –
`joined with
`
`
`
`6
`
`

`

`Samsung Electronics America, Inc. v.
`Papst Licensing GmbH & Co. KG
`
`IPR2017-
`00714
`
`
`
`Judicial matters:
`
`Case Caption
`In Re Papst Licensing Digital Camera Patent Litigation, MDL No.
`1880 (Misc. Action No. 07-493) relating to Nos. 07-cv-1118, 07-cv-
`1222, 07-cv-2086, 07-cv-2088, 08-cv-865, 08-cv-985, 08-cv-1406, and
`09-cv-530
`Papst Licensing GmbH & Co., KG v. HP, Inc., Case No. 3:16-cv-00575
`(N.D. Cal.)
`Papst Licensing GmbH & Co., KG v. Apple, Inc., Case No. 6:15-cv-
`01095 (E.D. Tex.)
`Papst Licensing GmbH & Co., KG v. Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. et
`al., Case No. 6:15-cv-01115 (E.D. Tex.)
`Papst Licensing GmbH & Co., KG v. Lenovo (United States), Inc. et al.,
`Case. No. 6:15-cv-01111 (E.D. Tex.)
`Papst Licensing GmbH & Co., KG v. LG Electronics, Inc. et al., Case
`No. 6:15-cv-01099 (E.D. Tex.)
`Papst Licensing GmbH & Co., KG v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et
`al., Case No. 6:15-cv-01102 (E.D. Tex.)
`Papst Licensing GmbH & Co., KG v. ZTE Corporation et al., Case. No.
`6:15-cv-01100 (E.D. Tex.)
`Papst Licensing GmbH & Co., KG v. Canon, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:15-
`cv-01692 (D.D.C.)
`Papst Licensing GmbH & Co., KG v. Fujifilm Corporation, et al., Case
`No. 1:15-cv-01693 (D.D.C.)
`Papst Licensing GmbH & Co., KG v. JVCKENWOOD Corporation et
`al., Case No. 1:15-cv-01747 (D.D.C.)
`Papst Licensing GmbH & Co., KG v. Nikon Corporation, et al., Case
`No. 1:15-cv-01748 (D.D.C.)
`Papst Licensing GmbH & Co., KG v. Olympus Corporation, et al., Case
`No. 1:15-cv-01749 (D.D.C.)
`Papst Licensing GmbH & Co., KG v. Panasonic Corporation, et al.,
`Case No. 1:15-cv-01750 (D.D.C.)
`Papst Licensing GmbH & Co., KG v. Canon, Inc., et al., Case No. 1:15-
`cv-00495 (D. Del.)
`Papst Licensing GmbH & Co., KG v. Fujifilm Corporation, et al., Case
`No. 1:15-cv-00496 (D. Del.)
`Papst Licensing GmbH & Co., KG v. HP, Inc., Case No. 1:15-cv-00497
`(D. Del.)
`Papst Licensing GmbH & Co., KG v. JVCKENWOOD Corporation, et
`al., Case No. 1:15-cv-00498 (D. Del.)
`
`Status
`Pending
`
`Terminated
`
`Pending/Stayed
`
`Terminated
`
`Pending
`
`Terminated
`
`Pending
`
`Terminated
`
`Pending
`
`Pending
`
`Pending
`
`Pending
`
`Terminated
`
`Pending
`
`Pending
`
`Pending
`
`Terminated
`
`Pending
`
`
`
`7
`
`

`

`Papst Licensing GmbH & Co., KG v. Nikon Corporation, et al., Case
`No. 1:15-cv-00499 (D. Del.)
`Papst Licensing GmbH & Co., KG v. Olympus Corporation, et al., Case
`No. 1:15-cv-00500 (D. Del.)
`Papst Licensing GmbH & Co., KG v. Panasonic Corporation, et al.,
`Case No. 1:15-cv-00501 (D. Del.)
`Hewlett-Packard Company v. Papst Licensing GmbH & Co. KG, Case.
`No. 3:15-cv-02101 (N.D. Cal.)
`
`Pending
`
`Terminated
`
`Pending
`
`Terminated
`
`
`
`Lead and Back-Up Counsel: Patent Owner designates the following
`C.
`counsel:
`
`LEAD COUNSEL
`Gregory S. Donahue (Reg. No.
`47,531)
`gdonahue@dinovoprice.com
`docketing@dinovoprice.com
`DiNovo Price LLP
`7000 North MoPac Expressway
`Suite 350
`Austin, Texas 78731
`T: (512) 539-2626
`F: (512) 539-2627
`
`BACK-UP COUNSEL
`Andrew G. DiNovo (Reg. No. 40,115)
`adinovo@dinovoprice.com
`docketing@dinovoprice.com
`DiNovo Price LLP
`7000 North MoPac Expressway
`Suite 350
`Austin, Texas 78731
`T: (512) 539-2626
`F: (512) 539-2627
`
`
`
`D.
`
`
`
`
`
`Service Information: Counsel for Patent Owner may be served
`
`electronically by email, or by certified mail, courier, or hand at the address listed
`
`above.
`
`E.
`
`Power of Attorney: A Power of Attorney is filed herewith.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`8
`
`

`

`Dated: 1/19/2018
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`/Gregory S. Donahue/
`
`
`Gregory S. Donahue
`Reg. No. 47,531
`DiNovo Price LLP
`7000 North MoPac Expressway
`Suite 350
`Austin, Texas 78731
`Lead Counsel for Patent Owner
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`9
`
`

`

`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`I hereby certify that on this 19th day of January 2018, a true and correct copy
`
`of the foregoing MANDATORY NOTICES OF PATENT OWNER AND
`
`RELATED MATTERS was served by electronic mail upon the following counsel
`
`of record for Petitioners:
`
`David M. Maiorana
`Matthew W. Johnson
`David L. Witcoff
`Marc S. Blackman
`JONES DAY
`dmaiorana@jonesday.com
`mwjohnson@jonesday.com
`dlwitcoff@jonesday.com
`msblackman@jonesday.com
`
`Mark Ungerman
`UNGERMAN IP PLLC
`mungerman@ungermanip.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Carrie A. Beyer
`Nikola Colic
`Brian C. Rupp
`DRINKER BIDDLE & REATH
`LLP
`carrie.beyer@dbr.com
`nick.colic@dbr.com
`brian.rupp@dbr.com
`
`
`
`
`/Gregory S. Donahue/
`
`Gregory S. Donahue
`Reg. No. 47,531
`DiNovo Price LLP
`7000 North MoPac Expressway
`Suite 350
`Austin, Texas 78731
`Lead Counsel for Patent Owner
`
`
`
`10
`
`