throbber

`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`__________________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`___________________
`
`CISCO SYSTEMS, INC.,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`FINJAN, INC.,
`Patent Owner.
`____________________
`
`Case IPR2018-00391
`Patent 7,647,633
`
`__________________________________________________________
`
`PATENT OWNER’S MOTION FOR ENTRY OF THE DEFAULT
`PROTECTIVE ORDER AND TO SEAL PATENT OWNER’S RESPONSE
`AND CERTAIN EXHIBITS UNDER 37 C.F.R. §§ 42.14 AND 42.54
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. §§ 42.14 and 42.54, Patent Owner, Finjan, Inc.,
`
`(“Finjan”) hereby moves for entry of the Default Protective Order and to seal
`
`portions of its Patent Owner Response and certain Exhibits (collectively referred to
`
`herein as the “Subject Exhibits”) to Finjan’s Patent Owner Response which are
`
`identified below:
`
`Filing/Exhibit Content
`
`
`
`Patent Owner’s
`Response
`
`Section
`
`Redacted
`portion on
`pages 40-41
`
`Exhibit 2012
`
`
`Declaration of Phil
`Hartstein in Support of
`Patent Owner’s
`Response
`
`¶ 5
`
`¶ 7
`
`Confidential
`Information1
`Contains highly
`confidential
`information regarding
`licensing practices
`Contains highly
`confidential
`information regarding
`licensing practices
`Contains highly
`confidential
`information regarding
`licensing practices
`
`
`1 Further details regarding the confidential information regarding each of the
`
`filings and exhibits identified in this chart are explained infra at § I. A copy of the
`
`Default Protective Order is concurrently filed herewith and attached hereto as
`
`Exhibit 2026.
`
`1
`
`

`

`I.
`
`GOOD CAUSE EXISTS FOR SEALING CERTAIN CONFIDENTIAL
`INFORMATION
`
`The Board’s standards for granting motions to seal are discussed in Garmin
`
`International v. Cuozzo Speed Technologies, LLC, IPR2012-00001 (Paper 34 at 4-
`
`5)(P.T.A.B. Mar. 14, 2013) and Corning Optical Commc’ns RF, LLC v. PPC
`
`Broadband, Inc., Case IPR2014-00440 (Papers 46, 47, 49) (P.T.A.B. Apr. 6, 14,
`
`and 17, 2015). The standard for granting a motion to seal is “good cause.” 37
`
`C.F.R. § 42.54(a). The moving party bears the burden of showing that the relief
`
`requested should be granted. 37 C.F.R. § 42.20(c). In particular:
`
`The rules aim to strike a balance between the public’s interest in
`maintaining a complete and understandable file history and the
`parties’ interest in protecting truly sensitive information.
`*
`*
`*
`Confidential Information: The rules identify confidential information
`in a manner consistent with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure
`26(c)(1)(G), which provides for protective orders for trade secret or
`other confidential research, development, or commercial information.
`
`Office Trial and Practice Guide, 77 Fed. Reg. 48756, 48760 (Aug. 14, 2012); 35
`
`U.S.C. § 316(a)(7); 37 C.F.R. § 42.54.
`
`Finjan’s Patent Owner Response and the Subject Exhibits contain
`
`confidential information requiring that they be designated as “PROTECTIVE
`
`ORDER MATERIAL” under Default Protective Order (attached hereto as Exhibit
`
`
`
`2
`
`

`

`2026). The Patent Owner Response and Subject Exhibits each contain highly
`
`confidential information of Finjan and third parties Specifically, each discuss and
`
`reveal confidential information regarding Finjan’s and/or third party’s licensing
`
`practices including highly sensitive information relating to such licenses. The
`
`confidential information disclosed in the Patent Owner Response and each of the
`
`Subject Exhibits is outlined in the chart above.
`
`The sealing of the foregoing is of particular importance because the public
`
`disclosure of such “truly sensitive information” would impact Finjan’s and third
`
`party’s competitive position in the market. In particular, information regarding
`
`certain licenses, and the development efforts and strategies at Finjan, would allow
`
`competitors to access information that would significantly harm Finjan’s
`
`competitive position in the marketplace.
`
`
`
`Furthermore, and notwithstanding the foregoing, granting this Motion would
`
`not prejudice nor impact this underlying proceeding. The public’s interest in
`
`accessing the information requiring that the limited identified portions of the Patent
`
`Owner Response and Subject Exhibits be sealed for the purposes of the
`
`patentability of the challenged claims is unquestionably outweighed by the
`
`prejudicial effect and competitive harm of disclosing the above described
`
`confidential business information of third party.
`
`
`
`3
`
`

`

`II. CERTIFICATION OF NON-PUBLICATION
`
`To the best of Finjan’s knowledge, the confidential information contained in
`
`the Patent Owner Response and the Subject Exhibits has not been made publically
`
`available.
`
`III. CERTIFICATION OF CONFERENCE WITH OPPOSING PARTY
`PURSUANT TO 37 C.F.R. § 42.54
`
`Finjan, in good faith, met and conferred with Petitioner regarding the scope
`
`of the Default Protective Order. Petitioner does not object to the entry of the
`
`Default Protective Order.
`
`IV. PROPOSED PROTECTIVE ORDER
`
`Finjan proposes that the Default Protective Order found in Appendix B of
`
`the Trial Practice Guide be entered. A copy of the Default Protective Order is
`
`concurrently filed herewith and attached hereto as Exhibit 2026. Petitioner does
`
`not object to the entry of the Default Protective Order.
`
`V. CONCLUSION AND RELIEF REQUESTED
`
`Accordingly, good cause exists to warrant entry of the Default Protective
`
`Order and to seal Finjan’s Patent Owner Response and the Subject Exhibits from
`
`public disclosure.
`
`
`
`4
`
`

`

`Dated: September 10, 2018
`
`
`(Case No. IPR2018-00391)
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`
`
`
`/James Hannah/
`
`James Hannah (Reg. No. 56,369)
`Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP
`990 Marsh Road
`Menlo Park, CA 94025
`Tel: 650.752.1700 Fax: 212.715.8000
`
`Jeffrey H. Price (Reg. No. 69,141)
`Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP
`1177 Avenue of the Americas
`New York, NY 10036
`Tel: 212.715.7502 Fax: 212.715.8302
`
`
`
`Attorneys for Patent Owner
`
`
`
`5
`
`

`

`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`The undersigned certifies, in accordance with 37 C.F.R. § 42.6(e), that
`
`service was made on the Petitioner as detailed below.
`
`Date of service September 10, 2018
`
`Manner of service Electronic Mail (PDMcPherson@duanemorris.com;
`PCMuldoon@duanemorris.com;
`japowers@duanemorris.com)
`
`Documents served PATENT OWNER’S MOTION FOR ENTRY OF THE
`DEFAULT PROTECTIVE ORDER AND TO SEAL
`PATENT OWNER’S RESPONSE AND CERTAIN
`EXHIBITS
`
`
`
`Persons Served Patrick D. McPherson
`Patrick Muldoon
`Joseph A. Powers
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/James Hannah/
`
`James Hannah (Reg. No. 56,369)
`Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP
`990 Marsh Road,
`Menlo Park, CA 94025
`(650) 752-1700
`
`6
`
`
`
`
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket