throbber
APPLICATION NUMBER
`
`FILING or 371 (c) GRP ART UNIT
`DATE
`
`FIL FEE REC'D
`
`ATTY.DOCKET.NO DRAWINGS
`
`TOT CLAIMS
`
`IND CLAIMS
`
`11/537,986
`
`10/02/2006
`
`2863
`
`0.00
`
`854263.419
`
`3
`
`27
`
`3
`
`UNITED STATES DEPART:vIENT OF COMMERCE
`United States Patent and Trademark Office
`Addm" COMMISSIC!I\ER FOIZ PA'l'l':N'l'S
`PO Rox 1410
`Alexandria, Virginia 22313-1450
`wv1w.uspto.gov
`
`38106
`SEED INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW GROUP PLLC
`701 FIFTH AVENUE, SUITE 5400
`SEATTLE, WA98104-7092
`
`CONFIRMATION N0.1286
`
`FILING RECEIPT
`
`Date Mailed: 11/07/2006
`
`Receipt is acknowledged of this regular Patent Application. It will be considered in its order and you will be
`notified as to the results of the examination. Be sure to provide the U.S. APPLICATION NUMBER, FILING
`DATE, NAME OF APPLICANT, and TITLE OF INVENTION when inquiring about this application. Fees
`transmitted by check or draft are subject to collection. Please verify the accuracy of the data presented on
`this receipt. If an error is noted on this Filing Receipt, please mail to the Commissioner for Patents
`P.O. Box 1450 Alexandria Va 22313-1450. Please provide a copy of this Filing Receipt with the
`changes noted thereon. If you received a "Notice to File Missing Parts" for this application, please
`submit any corrections to this Filing Receipt with your reply to the Notice. When the USPTO
`processes the reply to the Notice, the USPTO will generate another Filing Receipt incorporating the
`requested corrections (if appropriate).
`
`Applicant( s)
`
`Fabio Pasolini, S. Martino Siccomario, ITALY;
`Iva Binda, Voghera, ITALY;
`
`Assignment For Published Patent Application
`
`STMICROELECTRONICS S.R.L., Agrate Brianza, ITALY
`Power of Attorney: None
`
`Domestic Priority data as claimed by applicant
`
`Foreign Applications
`
`EUROPEAN PATENT OFFICE (EPO) 05425684.7 10/03/2005
`
`If Required, Foreign Filing License Granted: 11/06/2006
`
`The country code and number of your priority application, to be used for filing abroad under the Paris Convention, is
`US11/537,986
`
`Projected Publication Date: To Be Determined - pending completion of Missing Parts
`
`Non-Publication Request: No
`
`Early Publication Request: No
`
`Title
`
`METHOD FOR CONTROLLING A PEDOMETER BASED ON THE USE OF INERTIAL
`SENSORS AND PEDOMETER IMPLEMENTING THE METHOD
`
`IPR2018-00389
`Ex. 3001
`
`

`

`Preliminary Class
`
`702
`PROTECTING YOUR INVENTION OUTSIDE THE UNITED STATES
`
`Since the rights granted by a U.S. patent extend only throughout the territory of the United States and have
`no effect in a foreign country, an inventor who wishes patent protection in another country must apply for a
`patent in a specific country or in regional patent offices. Applicants may wish to consider the filing of an
`international application under the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT). An international (PCT) application
`generally has the same effect as a regular national patent application in each PCT-member country. The
`PCT process simplifies the filing of patent applications on the same invention in member countries, but
`does not result in a grant of "an international patent" and does not eliminate the need of applicants to file
`additional documents and fees in countries where patent protection is desired.
`
`Almost every country has its own patent law, and a person desiring a patent in a particular country must
`make an application for patent in that country in accordance with its particular laws. Since the laws of many
`countries differ in various respects from the patent law of the United States, applicants are advised to seek
`guidance from specific foreign countries to ensure that patent rights are not lost prematurely.
`
`Applicants also are advised that in the case of inventions made in the United States, the Director of the
`USPTO must issue a license before applicants can apply for a patent in a foreign country. The filing of a U.S.
`patent application serves as a request for a foreign filing license. The application's filing receipt contains
`further information and guidance as to the status of applicant's license for foreign filing.
`
`Applicants may wish to consult the USPTO booklet, "General Information Concerning Patents" (specifically,
`the section entitled "Treaties and Foreign Patents") for more information on timeframes and deadlines for
`filing foreign patent applications. The guide is available either by contacting the USPTO Contact Center at
`800-786-9199, or it can be viewed on the USPTO website at
`http://www.uspto.gov/web/offices/pac/doc/general/index.html.
`
`For information on preventing theft of your intellectual property (patents, trademarks and copyrights), you
`may wish to consult the U.S. Government website, http://www.stopfakes.gov. Part of a Department of
`Commerce initiative, this website includes self-help "toolkits" giving innovators guidance on how to protect
`intellectual property in specific countries such as China, Korea and Mexico. For questions regarding patent
`enforcement issues, applicants may call the U.S. Government hotline at 1-866-999-HAL T (1-866-999-4158).
`
`LICENSE FOR FOREIGN FILING UNDER
`
`Title 35, United States Code, Section 184
`
`Title 37, Code of Federal Regulations, 5.11 & 5.15
`
`GRANTED
`
`The applicant has been granted a license under 35 U.S.C. 184, if the phrase "IF REQUIRED, FOREIGN
`FILING LICENSE GRANTED" followed by a date appears on this form. Such licenses are issued in all
`applications where the conditions for issuance of a license have been met, regardless of whether or not a
`license may be required as set forth in 37 CFR 5.15. The scope and limitations of this license are set forth in
`37 CFR 5.15(a) unless an earlier license has been issued under 37 CFR 5.15(b). The license is subject to
`revocation upon written notification. The date indicated is the effective date of the license, unless an earlier
`license of similar scope has been granted under 37 CFR 5.13 or 5.14.
`
`This license is to be retained by the licensee and may be used at any time on or after the effective date
`thereof unless it is revoked. This license is automatically transferred to any related applications(s) filed under
`37 CFR 1.53(d). This license is not retroactive.
`
`The grant of a license does not in any way lessen the responsibility of a licensee for the security of the
`
`

`

`subject matter as imposed by any Government contract or the prov1s1ons of existing laws relating to
`espionage and the national security or the export of technical data. Licensees should apprise themselves of
`current regulations especially with respect to certain countries, of other agencies, particularly the Office of
`Defense Trade Controls, Department of State (with respect to Arms, Munitions and Implements of War (22
`CFR 121-128)); the Bureau of Industry and Security, Department of Commerce (15 CFR parts 730-774); the
`Office of Foreign AssetsControl, Department of Treasury (31 CFR Parts 500+) and the Department of
`Energy.
`
`NOT GRANTED
`
`No license under 35 U.S.C. 184 has been granted at this time, if the phrase "IF REQUIRED, FOREIGN
`FILING LICENSE GRANTED" DOES NOT appear on this form. Applicant may still petition for a license
`under 37 CFR 5.12, if a license is desired before the expiration of 6 months from the filing date of the
`application. If 6 months has lapsed from the filing date of this application and the licensee has not received
`any indication of a secrecy order under 35 U.S.C. 181, the licensee may foreign file the application pursuant
`to 37 CFR 5.15(b).
`
`

`

`METHOD FOR CONTROLLING A PEDOMETER BASED ON THE USE OF
`
`INERTIAL SENSORS AND PEDOMETER IMPLEMENTING THE METHOD
`
`BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
`
`Field of the Invention
`
`5
`
`The present invention relates to a method for controlling a pedometer
`
`based on the use of inertial sensors and to a pedometer implementing said
`
`method.
`
`Description of the Related Art
`
`As is known, a pedometer is a device that can be carried by a user
`
`10 and has the function of counting the number of steps during various walking or
`
`running activities for estimating accordingly the distance traveled. The indications
`
`supplied are useful for quantifying the motor activity performed by a person in the
`
`course of a given period, for instance, for clinical purposes, for assessing the
`
`athletic performance, or even just for simple personal interest.
`
`15
`
`The reliability of a pedometer obviously depends on the precision in
`
`estimating the step length of the user at the various rates of locomotion, but also
`
`on the selectivity in recognizing and ignoring events not correlated to the gait,
`
`which, however, cause perturbations resembling those produced by a step. For
`
`example, many pedometers are based on the use of inertial sensors, which detect
`
`20 accelerations along a substantially vertical axis, and recognize that a step has
`
`been being made by a user when the time plot of the acceleration signal shows
`
`given morphological characteristics. Basically, a step is recognized when the
`
`pedometer detects a positive acceleration peak (i.e., a peak directed upwards)
`
`having an amplitude greater than a first threshold, followed, at a distance of some
`
`25
`
`tenths of second, by a negative acceleration peak (directed downwards) having an
`
`amplitude greater than a second threshold. However, there are many random
`
`1
`
`

`

`events that can interfere with correct recognition of the step. Impact or other
`
`external vibrations and given movements of the user can, in fact, give rise to so(cid:173)
`
`called "false positives", i.e., to events that are recognized as steps even though in
`
`actual fact they are not, because the morphological characteristics produced are
`
`5
`
`compatible. Events of this type are very frequent also in periods of rest, when the
`
`user, albeit not walking, in any case performs movements that can be detected by
`
`the pedometer. In the majority of cases, also "isolated" steps or very brief
`
`sequences of steps are far from significant and should preferably be ignored
`
`because they are, in effect, irrelevant in regard to assessment of the motor activity
`
`10
`
`for which the pedometer is being used.
`
`Of course, in all these situations, the count of the steps may prove to
`
`be completely erroneous.
`
`BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
`
`One embodiment of the present invention is a method for controlling
`
`15 a pedometer and a pedometer which overcome the described above limitations.
`
`One embodiment is a method for controlling a pedometer. The
`
`method includes: generating a signal correlated to movements of a user of the
`
`pedometer; detecting steps of the user based on the signal; checking whether
`
`sequences of the detected steps satisfy pre-determined conditions of regularity;
`
`20 updating a total number of valid steps if the conditions of regularity are satisfied;
`
`and preventing updating of the total number of valid steps if the conditions of
`
`regularity are not satisfied.
`
`BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE SEVERAL VIEWS OF THE DRAWINGS
`
`For a better understanding of the invention, an embodiment thereof is
`
`25 now described, purely by way of non-limiting example and with reference to the
`
`attached plate of drawings, wherein:
`
`2
`
`

`

`Figure 1 shows a simplified and partially sectioned perspective view
`
`of a portable electronic device incorporating a pedometer according to the present
`
`invention;
`
`Figure 2 is a simplified block diagram of the pedometer of Figure 1;
`
`5
`
`Figure 3 shows a flowchart corresponding to a control method
`
`according to the present invention executed by the pedometer of Figures 1 and 2;
`
`Figure 4 is a more detailed flowchart corresponding to a first step of
`
`the method of Figure 3;
`
`Figure 5 is a graph that represents first quantities used in the method
`
`10 according to the present invention;
`
`Figure 6 is a graph that represents second quantities used in the
`
`method according to the present invention;
`
`Figure 7 is a more detailed flowchart corresponding to a second step
`
`of the method of Figure 3; and
`
`15
`
`Figure 8 is a more detailed flowchart corresponding to a third step of
`
`the method of Figure 3.
`
`DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
`
`With reference to Figures 1 and 2, a pedometer 1 is integrated within
`
`a portable electronic device, such as a cell phone 2. The pedometer 1 comprises
`
`20 an inertial sensor 3, a control unit 5, equipped with a nonvolatile-memory module
`
`(not illustrated herein), a display 6, and a communication interface 8, all housed on
`
`a card 9, which is, in turn, fixed within a casing 10 of the cell phone 2. In the
`
`embodiment described herein, the control unit 5 performs control functions of the
`
`pedometer 1 and, moreover, presides over bi-directional communication and over
`
`25 handling of the functions envisaged for the cell phone 2. Likewise, the display 6,
`
`which is obviously arranged so as to be visible from the outside of the casing 10,
`
`can be used for displaying both information regarding the pedometer 1 and, more
`
`in general, information regarding the operation of the cell phone 2.
`
`3
`
`

`

`The inertial sensor 3 is a linear accelerometer of a MEMS (micro(cid:173)
`
`electromechanical systems) type and is mounted on the card 9 so as to have a
`
`detection axis Z substantially parallel to a longitudinal axis L of the casing 10 of the
`
`cell phone 2. In practice, the detection axis Zand the longitudinal axis Lare
`
`5
`
`substantially horizontal, when the cell phone 2 is resting on a surface, and
`
`substantially vertical or slightly inclined with respect to the vertical when the cell
`
`phone 2 is handled. The inertial sensor 3 supplies at output an acceleration signal
`
`Az, which is correlated to the accelerations undergone by the inertial sensor 3 itself
`
`along the detection axis Z.
`
`10
`
`The control unit 5 receives and processes the acceleration signal Az
`
`as explained in detail hereinafter for identifying and counting a total number of
`
`valid steps Nvr made by a user wearing or carrying the pedometer 1, for example,
`
`on his belt or on his shoulder. In addition, the control unit 5 is preferably
`
`configured for generating an estimate of the distance traveled by the user and
`
`15 other data, such as, for example, estimates of the average speed during
`
`movement and energy consumption. The total number of valid steps Nvr and the
`
`other data possibly produced are sent to the display 6.
`
`The communication interface 8 in this case is based on the
`
`transceiver system (known and not shown) of the cell phone 2 and, preferably,
`
`20 also comprises a port (also known and not shown) for communication with a
`
`computer. The communication interface 8 can thus be used both for downloading
`
`the data produced by the pedometer 1 (amongst which at least the total number of
`
`valid steps Nvr) and for uploading operating parameters for the pedometer 1 into
`
`the control unit 5.
`
`25
`
`The control unit 5 is configured for executing a control procedure, as
`
`illustrated with reference to Figures 3-8.
`
`Upon switching-on of the pedometer 1, an initialization step is
`
`executed (block 100, Figure 3), in which a first counter of the total number of valid
`
`steps Nvr; a second counter, hereinafter referred to as number of valid control
`
`4
`
`

`

`steps Nvc; and a third counter, hereinafter referred to as number of invalid steps
`
`N1Nv, are set to zero.
`
`The control unit 5 then executes a first counting procedure (block
`
`110), based upon the sampling of the acceleration signal Az at a pre-determined
`
`5
`
`frequency, for example 25 Hz. In this step, the user is considered at rest and the
`
`control unit 5 is considered as waiting to recognize, on the basis of the
`
`acceleration signal Az, sequences of events corresponding to a sequence of steps
`
`that are close to one another, which satisfy pre-determined conditions of regularity
`
`described in detail hereinafter. When a sequence of steps corresponding to a
`
`10
`
`regular gait of the user is recognized, the first counting procedure is interrupted.
`
`Alternatively, the first counting procedure terminates when a time interval Tc that
`
`has elapsed from the last step recognized is longer than a first time threshold T81 ,
`
`for example 10 s. On exit from the first calculation procedure, the control unit 5
`
`sets a state flag Fsr to a first value C, if a sequence of steps that satisfies the
`
`15
`
`conditions of regularity has been recognized, and to a second value PD, if the first
`
`time threshold Ts1 has been exceeded.
`
`At the end of the first counting procedure, the control unit 5 checks
`
`whether the state flag Fsr has been set at the first value C (block 120), i.e.,
`
`whether a sequence of steps has been recognized. If so (output YES from block
`
`20 120), a second counting procedure is executed (block 130). The user is
`
`considered to be moving, and a first counter, hereinafter referred to as total
`
`number of valid steps Nvr, is incremented whenever an event corresponding to a
`
`step is recognized. Furthermore, the control unit 5 checks the regularity of the
`
`sequences of steps, as explained hereinafter, and, when an interruption in the
`
`25
`
`locomotion is detected, the second counting procedure is terminated, and
`
`execution of the first counting procedure resumes (block 110).
`
`If, instead, the state flag Fsr has the second value PD, the
`
`pedometer 1 is set in a low-consumption wait state ("power down" state), and the
`
`control unit 5 executes a surveying procedure (block 140). The surveying
`
`5
`
`

`

`procedure terminates when a variation of the d.c. component of the acceleration
`
`signal Az is detected, i.e., when the cell phone 2 that includes the pedometer 1 is
`
`moved. The control unit 5 then returns to execution of the first calculation
`
`procedure (block 110).
`
`5
`
`The first counting procedure is illustrated in greater detail in Figure 4.
`
`Initially, the control unit 5 reads a sample of the acceleration signal
`
`Az (block 200) and then evaluates whether the time interval Tc that has elapsed
`
`from the last step recognized is higher than the first time threshold Ts1, i.e.,
`
`whether the step recognition fails for a period longer than the first time threshold
`
`10 T s1 (block 205). If so (output YES from block 205), the state flag Fsr is set at the
`
`second value PD (block 210) and the first counting procedure is terminated (in this
`
`eventuality, after the test on the state flag Fsr of block 120 of Figure 3, the
`
`surveying procedure is executed, block 140). Otherwise (output NO from block
`
`205), the duration of the time interval Tc is compared with a second time threshold
`
`15 Ts2, shorter than the first time threshold Ts1 and equal, for example, to 3 s (block
`
`215). If the second time threshold Ts2 has been exceeded (output YES from block
`
`215), the number of valid control steps Nvc and the number of invalid steps N1Nv
`
`are set to zero (block 220); then a step-recognition test is carried out (block 225).
`
`Otherwise (output NO from block 215), the control unit 5 directly executes the step-
`
`20
`
`recognition test.
`
`In the step-recognition test of block 225, the control unit 5 verifies
`
`whether the time plot of the acceleration signal Az (i.e., the sequence of the
`
`samples acquired) has pre-determined characteristics. In particular (Figure 5), a
`
`step is recognized if the acceleration signal Az shows a positive peak, higher than
`
`25 a positive acceleration threshold Azp, followed by a negative peak, smaller than a
`
`negative acceleration threshold AzN, and if the negative peak falls within a time
`
`window TW of pre-determined amplitude and, moreover, located at a pre(cid:173)
`
`determined distance after the positive peak.
`
`6
`
`

`

`If the control unit 5 does not recognize an event corresponding to a
`
`step (output NO from block 225), a new sample of the acceleration signal Az is
`
`read (block 200). If, instead, the step-recognition test is passed (output YES from
`
`block 225), the control unit 5 executes a first validation test, corresponding to the
`
`5
`
`regularity of the individual step (block 230). With reference also to Figure 6, the
`
`validation occurs when the duration ~T Kofa current step K is substantially
`
`homogeneous with respect to the duration ~ T K-1 of an immediately preceding step
`K-1 (the duration of a generic step is determined by the time that has elapsed
`
`between an instant of recognition of the step of which the duration is evaluated and
`
`10 an instant of recognition of the step that immediately precedes it). More precisely,
`
`the last step recognized is validated if the instant of recognition of the current step
`
`T R(K) falls within a validation interval TV, defined with respect to the instant of
`
`recognition of the immediately preceding step T R(K-1 ), in the following way:
`
`TV= [T R(K-1 )+~T K-1-TA, T R(K-1 )+ ~T K-1+ TB]
`
`15 where TA and TB are complementary portions of the validation interval TV. In the
`
`embodiment of the invention described herein, the complementary portions TA, TB
`
`are defined as follows, for the generic current step K:
`
`TA=~TK-1/2
`
`TB= ~TK-1
`
`20
`
`Consequently, the validation interval is asymmetrical with respect to
`
`the instant T R(K-1 )+~T K-1 and has an amplitude equal to 3~ T K-112. The validation
`
`interval TV could, however, be symmetrical and have a different amplitude. In
`
`practice, it is verified that the last step recognized is compatible with the frequency
`
`of the last steps made previously.
`
`25
`
`If the verification yields a negative result (output NO from block 230),
`
`the number of invalid steps N1Nv is incremented by one (block 235) before being
`
`compared with a first programmable threshold number Nr1, for example 3 (block
`
`240). If the number of invalid steps N1Nv has reached the first threshold number
`
`7
`
`

`

`Nr1 (output YES from block 240), both the number of invalid steps N1Nv, and the
`
`number of valid control steps Nvc are set to zero (block 245), and the first counting
`
`procedure is resumed, with reading of a new sample of the acceleration signal Az
`
`(block 200). If, instead, the number of invalid steps N1Nv is smaller than the first
`
`5
`
`threshold number Nr1 (output NO from block 240), the number of valid control
`
`steps Nvc is decremented (block 250). In the embodiment described herein, the
`
`decrement is equal to two. If the result of the decrement operation is negative, the
`
`number of valid control steps Nvc is set to zero (in practice, the updated value of
`
`the number of valid control steps Nvc is equal to the smaller between zero and the
`
`10 previous value of the number of valid control steps Nvc, decreased by two). Then,
`
`the control unit 5 reads a new sample of the acceleration signal Az (block 200).
`
`If the first validation test of block 230 is passed, the number of valid
`
`control steps Nvc is incremented by one (block 255), and then the control unit 5
`
`executes a first test on regularity of the sequence of steps recognized (block 260).
`
`15 The first regularity test is based upon a first condition of regularity and envisages
`
`comparing the number of valid control steps Nvc with a second programmable
`
`threshold number Nr2 greater than the first threshold number Nr1 (for example, 8).
`
`In practice, the first condition of regularity is satisfied when there is a significant
`
`prevalence of steps spaced in a substantially uniform way, at the most interrupted
`
`20
`
`sporadically by a number of irregular steps smaller than the first threshold number
`
`Nr1. If the number of valid control steps Nvc is smaller than the second threshold
`
`number Nr2 (output NO from block 260), the first condition of regularity is not
`
`satisfied, and the first regularity test indicates that there has not yet been identified
`
`a sequence of steps corresponding to a sufficiently regular gait, and hence the
`
`25
`
`control unit 5 acquires once again a new sample of the acceleration signal Az
`
`(block 200), without the total number of valid steps Nvr being incremented.
`
`Otherwise (output YES from block 260), a sequence of steps is recognized that
`
`satisfies the first condition of regularity, and the first regularity test is passed. The
`
`number of invalid steps N1Nv and the number of valid control steps Nvc are set to
`
`8
`
`

`

`zero, whereas the total number of valid steps Nvr is updated and incremented by a
`
`value equal to the second threshold number Nr2 (block 265). Furthermore, the
`state flag Fsr is set at the count value, and the first counting procedure is
`
`terminated. In this case, after the test on the state flag of block 120 of Figure 3,
`
`5
`
`the second counting procedure is executed (block 130).
`
`In practice, the first counting procedure enables the pedometer 1 to
`
`remain waiting for a sequence of events corresponding to a sequence of steps that
`
`satisfies the first condition of regularity. The regularity of the gait is considered
`
`sufficient when the number of valid control steps Nvc reaches the second threshold
`
`10 number Nr2. The events considered irregular or a waiting time that is too long
`
`between two successive steps cause the decrement (block 250) or the zeroing
`
`(blocks 220 and 245) of the number of valid control steps Nvc, so that the first
`
`counting procedure resumes from the start. As long as the pedometer 1 is in the
`
`waiting condition, the total number of valid steps Nvr is not incremented because
`
`15
`
`the user is still considered as at rest. However, when the first regularity test (block
`
`260) is passed, the total number of valid steps Nvr is immediately updated so as to
`
`take into account the valid steps (equal to Nr2) that make up the sequence
`
`considered as being regular. Isolated events and sequence of steps that are in
`
`any case too short are thus advantageously ignored, whereas counting of the
`
`20
`
`steps promptly resumes also in the case of isolated irregularities (for example, due
`
`to a non-homogeneous acceleration or to a loss of balance at the start of
`
`locomotion).
`
`The possibility of programming the value of the first threshold number
`
`Nr1 and of the second threshold number Nr2 enables modification of the sensitivity
`25 of the pedometer in recognizing an initial sequence of steps. For example, the
`
`user can program lower values of the first threshold number Nr1 and of the second
`
`threshold number Nr2 (for example 2 and 4, respectively) when he remains for a
`
`long time in a closed environment, for example an office or a room, where it would
`
`not in any case be possible to maintain a regular gait for a long time. In this way,
`
`9
`
`

`

`shorter sequences of steps are validated and counted. Instead, during a more
`
`constant and intense activity, such as running, the gait remains constant for a long
`
`time, and hence the first threshold number Nr1 and the second threshold number
`
`Nr2 can be programmed with higher values (for example, 4 and 12, respectively).
`
`5 Step sequences that are shorter and not very significant in relation to the activity
`
`performed can be ignored.
`
`Figure 7 illustrates in detail the second counting procedure (executed
`
`in block 130 of Figure 3).
`
`The control unit 5 initially reads a sample of the acceleration signal
`
`10 Az (block 300), and then evaluates whether the time interval Tc that has elapsed
`
`from the last step recognized is higher than the first second time threshold Ts2
`
`(block 305). If so (output YES from block 205), the number of invalid steps N1Nv
`
`and the number of valid control steps Nvc are zeroized (block 310), and the
`
`second counting procedure is terminated. Otherwise (output NO from block 305),
`
`15 a step-recognition test is carried out (block 315), identical to the step-recognition
`
`test of block 225 of Figure 3. Also in this case, then, step recognition is based
`
`upon the detection of a positive peak of the acceleration signal Az followed by a
`
`negative peak that falls in the time window TW (see Figure 5).
`
`If the control unit 5 does not recognize an event corresponding to a
`
`20
`
`step (output NO from block 315), a new sample of the acceleration signal Az is
`
`read (block 300). If, instead, the step-recognition test is passed (output YES from
`
`block 315), a second validation test is made, corresponding to the regularity of the
`
`individual step (block 320). The second validation test is altogether similar to the
`
`first validation test carried out in block 230 of Figure 3. Also in this case, then, the
`
`25
`
`last step recognized is validated if the instant of recognition of the current step
`
`T c(K) falls within the validation interval TV defined above. In practice, it is verified
`
`that the last step recognized is compatible with the frequency of the last steps
`
`made previously.
`
`10
`
`

`

`If the check yields a positive result (output YES from block 320), the
`
`control unit 5 updates the total number of valid steps Nvr and the number of valid
`
`control steps Nvc, incrementing them by one (block 325). The number of valid
`
`control steps Nvc is then compared with a third programmable threshold number
`
`5 Nr3 (block 330), which, in the embodiment described herein, is equal to the second
`
`threshold number Nr2. If the number of valid control steps Nvc is smaller than the
`
`second threshold number Nr2 (output NO from block 330), the control unit 5 once
`again directly acquires a new sample of the acceleration signal Az (block 300),
`
`whereas otherwise (output YES from block 330), the number of invalid steps N1Nv
`
`10 and the number of valid control steps Nvc are set to zero (block 335) prior to
`
`acquisition of a new sample Az.
`
`If, instead, the second validation test of block 320 is negative, the
`
`number of invalid steps N1Nv is incremented by one (block 340) before being
`
`compared with a fourth programmable threshold number Nr4 (block 345), which, in
`the present embodiment, is equal to the first threshold number Nr1. If the number
`
`15
`
`of invalid steps N1Nv is smaller than the fourth threshold number Nr4 (output NO
`
`from block 345), the number of valid control steps Nvc is decremented (block 350),
`
`here by two. Also in this case, if the result of the decrement operation is negative,
`
`the number of valid control steps Nvc is set to zero (the updated value of the
`
`20 number of valid control steps Nvc is equal to the smaller between zero and the
`
`previous value of the number of valid control steps Nvc, decreased by two). Then,
`
`the control unit 5 reads a new sample of the acceleration signal Az (block 300). If
`
`the number of invalid steps N1Nv has reached the fourth threshold number Nr4
`
`(output YES from block 345), the number of invalid steps N1Nv and the number of
`valid control steps Nvc are set to zero (block 355), and the second counting
`
`25
`
`procedure is terminated.
`
`In practice, the second counting procedure is based on a second
`
`condition of regularity, which is satisfied as long as sporadic irregular steps occur
`
`within sequences of steps spaced in a substantially homogeneous way. More
`
`11
`
`

`

`precisely, the second condition of regularity is satisfied as long as the number of
`
`invalid steps N1Nv is smaller than the fourth threshold number Nr4 • Consequently,
`
`the second counting procedure continues to update and increment the total
`
`number of valid steps Nvr as long as the gait of the user is kept regular. Possible
`
`5
`
`isolated irregularities are ignored and do not interrupt or suspend updating of the
`
`count, which is, instead, interrupted when prolonged pauses occur or in the
`
`presence of significant discontinuities in locomotion. However, if the gait becomes
`
`regular again, even with a different rhythm, also the count promptly resumes,
`
`because the first counting procedure is once again executed. This prevents a
`
`10
`
`significant number of steps from being neglected.
`
`The surveying procedure executed in block 140 of Figure 3 will now
`
`be described in greater detail, with reference to Figure 8.
`
`When the surveying procedure is started, a current mean value AzM
`
`of the acceleration signal Az is stored in the nonvolatile-memory module (not
`
`15
`
`illustrated) of the control unit 5 (block 400). The current mean value AzM
`
`represents an estimate of the DC component of the acceleration signal Az, which,
`
`when the cell phone 2 containing the pedometer 1 is stationary, is determined
`
`substantially by the contribution of the acceleration of gravity along the detection
`
`axis Z. In practice, then, the current mean value AzM provides an estimate of the
`
`20 position of the cell phone 2 and of the pedometer 1.
`
`After storage of the current mean value AzM, the pedometer 1 is set
`
`in a low-consumption operating condition (power-down condition), in which at least
`
`the inertial sensor 3 is inactive (b

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket