throbber
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`___________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`___________
`
`COMCAST CABLE COMMUNICATIONS, LLC,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`PROMPTU SYSTEMS CORPORATION,
`Patent Owner.
`
`___________
`
`Case IPR2018-00344
`Patent 7,047,196
`___________
`
`DECLARATION OF JEFFREY LAU IN SUPPORT OF PETITIONER’S
`
`REPLY TO PATENT OWNER’S RESPONSE
`
`Comcast - Exhibit 1028, cover
`
`

`

`I, Jeffrey Lau, make the following declaration in support of reply briefs filed by
`
`petitioner Comcast Cable Communications, LLC (“Comcast”) in two inter partes
`
`review proceedings involving U.S. Patent No. 7,047,196:
`
`1.
`
`I am an attorney with the law firm of Farella Braun + Martel LLP,
`
`counsel for Comcast. Unless otherwise stated, the facts stated in this declaration
`
`are based on my personal knowledge.
`
`2.
`
`The document submitted with the reply briefs and identified as
`
`Exhibit 1024 in both proceedings is a true and correct copy of excerpts from the
`
`transcript of the deposition of Paul M. Cook, which was taken over a period of
`
`three days including October 30, October 31, and November 1, 2018.
`
`3.
`
`The document submitted with the reply briefs and identified as
`
`Exhibit 1025 is a true and correct copy of the transcript of the deposition of David
`
`Chaiken, which was taken on November 30, 2018. We prepared and attached an
`
`index at the end of Exhibit 1025 showing the correspondence between the exhibit
`
`numbers used in the Chaiken deposition with exhibit numbers in these
`
`proceedings.
`
`4.
`
`The document submitted with the reply briefs and identified as
`
`Exhibit 1026 is a true and correct copy of the transcript of the deposition of John
`
`Tinsman, which was taken on November 29, 2018. We prepared and attached an
`
`index at the end of Exhibit 1026 showing the correspondence between the exhibit
`
`1
`
`Comcast - Exhibit 1028, page 1
`
`

`

`numbers used in the Tinsman deposition with exhibit numbers in these
`
`proceedings.
`
`5.
`
`The document submitted with the reply briefs and identified as
`
`Exhibit 1027 is a true and correct copy of paper entitled The Inducement Standard
`
`of Patentability, 120 Yale L.J. 1590 (2011) that appears to have been authored by
`
`Michael Abramowicz and John F. Duffy.
`
`I declare that all statements made herein of my own knowledge are true and
`
`that all statements made on information and belief are believed to be true; and
`
`further that these statements were made with the knowledge that willful false
`
`statements and the like so made are punishable by fine or imprisonment, or both,
`
`under Section 1001 of Title 18 of the United States Code.
`
`Jeffrey Lau
`
`2
`
`Comcast - Exhibit 1028, page 2
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket