throbber
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`APPLE INC.,
`
`Petitioner
`
`v.
`
`UNILOC LUXEMBOURG, S.A.
`
`Patent Owner
`
`
`
`
`
`IPR2018-00294
`
`PATENT 6,736,759
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`PATENT OWNER MOTION TO EXCLUDE
`
`PURSUANT TO 37 C.F.R. § 42.120
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`
`

`

`Patent Owner moves pursuant to 37 CFR §§ 42.53(d)(4)(ii) and 42.64(c) to
`
`exclude portions of the deposition transcript of William C. Easttom, II, filed as
`
`Exhibit 1027. Under Section 42.64(c):
`
`A motion to exclude evidence must be filed to preserve any objection.
`The motion must [1] identify the objections in the record in order and
`must [2] explain the objections. The motion may be filed without prior
`authorization from the Board.
`
`See 37 C.F.R. § 42.64(c). Further, according to the Trial Practice Guide, “[a] motion
`
`to exclude evidence must: … [3] [i]dentify where in the record the evidence sought
`
`to be excluded was relied upon by an opponent.” Trial Practice Guide, 77 Fed. Reg.
`
`48,756, 47,867.
`
`
`
`Petitioner’s Reply to Patent Owner’s Response (Paper 12) relies on several
`
`excerpts from the cross examination of Dr. Easttom (EX1027) that exceed the proper
`
`scope of cross-examination testimony allowed under Section 42.53(d)(4)(ii), which
`
`limits the scope of cross-examination testimony to “the scope of direct testimony.”
`
`Because such testimony was not “taken, sought, or filed” in accordance with Subpart
`
`A of Section 42, it is inadmissible and should be excluded from Petitioner’s briefs,
`
`motions and exhibits.
`
`Inadmissible evidence in the order it appears in the transcript:
`
`
`
`First, Petitioner’s Reply relies on EX1027 at 24:16-25:11. See Paper 12 at 8.
`
`This testimony exceeds the scope of Dr. Easttom’s direct testimony and is therefore
`
`inadmissible under Section 42.53(d)(4)(ii). Patent Owner preserved this objection
`
`2
`
`

`

`by objecting to scope during Dr. Easttom’s cross examination. See EX1027 at
`
`24:21-22. This excerpt of Dr. Easttom’s testimony should, therefore, be excluded
`
`from Petitioner’s briefs, motions and exhibits.
`
`Second, Petitioner’s Reply relies on EX1027 at 26:2-15. See Paper 12 at 7.
`
`This testimony exceeds the scope of Dr. Easttom’s direct testimony and is therefore
`
`inadmissible under Section 42.53(d)(4)(ii). Patent Owner preserved this objection
`
`by objecting to scope during Dr. Easttom’s cross examination. See EX1027 at 26:4-
`
`5. This excerpt of Dr. Easttom’s testimony should, therefore, be excluded from
`
`Petitioner’s briefs, motions and exhibits.
`
`Third, Petitioner’s Reply relies on EX1027 at 58:22-60:4. See Paper 12 at 7.
`
`This testimony exceeds the scope of Dr. Easttom’s direct testimony and is therefore
`
`inadmissible under Section 42.53(d)(4)(ii). Patent Owner preserved this objection
`
`by objecting to scope during Dr. Easttom’s cross examination. See EX1027 at
`
`58:24-25. This excerpt of Dr. Easttom’s testimony should, therefore, be excluded
`
`from Petitioner’s briefs, motions and exhibits.
`
`Fourth, Petitioner’s Reply relies on EX1027 at 86:25-87:11. See Paper 12 at
`
`17. This testimony exceeds the scope of Dr. Easttom’s direct testimony and is
`
`therefore inadmissible under Section 42.53(d)(4)(ii). Patent Owner preserved this
`
`objection by objecting to scope during Dr. Easttom’s cross examination. See
`
`3
`
`

`

`EX1027 at 87:4. This excerpt of Dr. Easttom’s testimony should, therefore, be
`
`excluded from Petitioner’s briefs, motions and exhibits.
`
`Date: January 3, 2019
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`By: /s/ Brett A. Mangrum
`Brett A. Mangrum
`Attorney for Patent Owner
`Reg. No. 64,783
`
`Ryan Loveless
`Attorney for Patent Owner
`Reg. No. 51,970
`
`
`
`
`
`
`4
`
`

`

`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
` I
`
` certify that the foregoing was served on the Petitioner’s counselors of record
`
`by electronic notification, as agreed to by the parties:
`
`Lead Counsel:
`
`Adam P. Seitz (Reg. No. 52,206)
`adam.seitz@eriseip.com
`ptab@eriseip.com
`
`
`Back-up Counsel:
`
`Paul R. Hart (Reg. No. 59,646)
`paul.hart@eriseip.com
`ptab@eriseip.com
`
`Chris R. Schmidt (Reg. No. 63,982)
`chris.schmidt@eriseip.com
`ptab@eriseip.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/s/ Brett A. Mangrum
`Brett A. Mangrum
`
`
`
`5
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket