`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`APPLE INC.,
`
`Petitioner
`
`v.
`
`UNILOC LUXEMBOURG, S.A.
`
`Patent Owner
`
`
`
`
`
`IPR2018-00294
`
`PATENT 6,736,759
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`PATENT OWNER MOTION TO EXCLUDE
`
`PURSUANT TO 37 C.F.R. § 42.120
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`
`
`
`Patent Owner moves pursuant to 37 CFR §§ 42.53(d)(4)(ii) and 42.64(c) to
`
`exclude portions of the deposition transcript of William C. Easttom, II, filed as
`
`Exhibit 1027. Under Section 42.64(c):
`
`A motion to exclude evidence must be filed to preserve any objection.
`The motion must [1] identify the objections in the record in order and
`must [2] explain the objections. The motion may be filed without prior
`authorization from the Board.
`
`See 37 C.F.R. § 42.64(c). Further, according to the Trial Practice Guide, “[a] motion
`
`to exclude evidence must: … [3] [i]dentify where in the record the evidence sought
`
`to be excluded was relied upon by an opponent.” Trial Practice Guide, 77 Fed. Reg.
`
`48,756, 47,867.
`
`
`
`Petitioner’s Reply to Patent Owner’s Response (Paper 12) relies on several
`
`excerpts from the cross examination of Dr. Easttom (EX1027) that exceed the proper
`
`scope of cross-examination testimony allowed under Section 42.53(d)(4)(ii), which
`
`limits the scope of cross-examination testimony to “the scope of direct testimony.”
`
`Because such testimony was not “taken, sought, or filed” in accordance with Subpart
`
`A of Section 42, it is inadmissible and should be excluded from Petitioner’s briefs,
`
`motions and exhibits.
`
`Inadmissible evidence in the order it appears in the transcript:
`
`
`
`First, Petitioner’s Reply relies on EX1027 at 24:16-25:11. See Paper 12 at 8.
`
`This testimony exceeds the scope of Dr. Easttom’s direct testimony and is therefore
`
`inadmissible under Section 42.53(d)(4)(ii). Patent Owner preserved this objection
`
`2
`
`
`
`by objecting to scope during Dr. Easttom’s cross examination. See EX1027 at
`
`24:21-22. This excerpt of Dr. Easttom’s testimony should, therefore, be excluded
`
`from Petitioner’s briefs, motions and exhibits.
`
`Second, Petitioner’s Reply relies on EX1027 at 26:2-15. See Paper 12 at 7.
`
`This testimony exceeds the scope of Dr. Easttom’s direct testimony and is therefore
`
`inadmissible under Section 42.53(d)(4)(ii). Patent Owner preserved this objection
`
`by objecting to scope during Dr. Easttom’s cross examination. See EX1027 at 26:4-
`
`5. This excerpt of Dr. Easttom’s testimony should, therefore, be excluded from
`
`Petitioner’s briefs, motions and exhibits.
`
`Third, Petitioner’s Reply relies on EX1027 at 58:22-60:4. See Paper 12 at 7.
`
`This testimony exceeds the scope of Dr. Easttom’s direct testimony and is therefore
`
`inadmissible under Section 42.53(d)(4)(ii). Patent Owner preserved this objection
`
`by objecting to scope during Dr. Easttom’s cross examination. See EX1027 at
`
`58:24-25. This excerpt of Dr. Easttom’s testimony should, therefore, be excluded
`
`from Petitioner’s briefs, motions and exhibits.
`
`Fourth, Petitioner’s Reply relies on EX1027 at 86:25-87:11. See Paper 12 at
`
`17. This testimony exceeds the scope of Dr. Easttom’s direct testimony and is
`
`therefore inadmissible under Section 42.53(d)(4)(ii). Patent Owner preserved this
`
`objection by objecting to scope during Dr. Easttom’s cross examination. See
`
`3
`
`
`
`EX1027 at 87:4. This excerpt of Dr. Easttom’s testimony should, therefore, be
`
`excluded from Petitioner’s briefs, motions and exhibits.
`
`Date: January 3, 2019
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`By: /s/ Brett A. Mangrum
`Brett A. Mangrum
`Attorney for Patent Owner
`Reg. No. 64,783
`
`Ryan Loveless
`Attorney for Patent Owner
`Reg. No. 51,970
`
`
`
`
`
`
`4
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
` I
`
` certify that the foregoing was served on the Petitioner’s counselors of record
`
`by electronic notification, as agreed to by the parties:
`
`Lead Counsel:
`
`Adam P. Seitz (Reg. No. 52,206)
`adam.seitz@eriseip.com
`ptab@eriseip.com
`
`
`Back-up Counsel:
`
`Paul R. Hart (Reg. No. 59,646)
`paul.hart@eriseip.com
`ptab@eriseip.com
`
`Chris R. Schmidt (Reg. No. 63,982)
`chris.schmidt@eriseip.com
`ptab@eriseip.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/s/ Brett A. Mangrum
`Brett A. Mangrum
`
`
`
`5
`
`