throbber
CENTER FOR DRUG EVALUATION AND
`RESEARCH
`
`APPLICATION NUMBER:
`21-303/S-001
`
`CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY AND
`BIOPHARMACEUTICS REVIEW(S)
`
`Page 1 of 8
`
`KVK-TECH EXHIBIT 1020
`
`

`

`OFFICE OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY AND BIOPHARMACEUTICS REVIEW
`
`sNDA:
`Name ofDrug:
`
`Indication of Drug:
`Type of Document:
`
`Sponsor:
`Reviewer:
`
`Date of Document: 10/26/01, 11116/01, 1129/02
`
`21-303/S001
`Adderall XR (Mixed Amphetamine and Dextroamphetamine Salts)
`10 mg, 20 mg and 30 mg Capsules
`Treatment of Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD)
`New Supplement for the Addition of New Strengths,
`5, 15 and 25 mg Capsules
`Shire Laboratories Inc., Rockville, MD
`Hong Zhao, Ph.D.
`
`Overall Summary
`
`Adderall XR is a modified-release capsule formulation based on the existing immediate(cid:173)
`release (IR) tablet of Adderall® (mixed salts of a single-entity amphetamine product).
`Both Adderall XR and Adderall IR contain d-amphetamine and /-amphetamine salts in
`the ratio of 3: 1. The Adderall XR formulation consists of two types of pellets in the ratio
`of ::.,...... in a gelatin capsule: an IR pellet and a delayed-release (DR) pellet with the
`pulsatile delivery scheme mimicking the effects of taking two doses of IR medication 4
`hours apart. The mechanism of drug release from the DR (enteric-coated) pellets is based
`on the higher pH values found in the small intestine compared with the stomach.
`
`Adderall XR capsules in strengths of 10, 20 and 30 mg have recently been approved for
`the treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Adderall XR capsules
`in strengths of 5, 15 and 25 mg have been developed to extend the available dosing
`options. The 15 mg and 25 mg capsules contain the same IR and DR pellets in the same
`proportions as the approved strengths and have similar dissolution profiles. Therefore, the
`in vivo bioequivalence study of these two strengths are not conducted. The 5 mg capsule,
`however, uses the same DR pellet and a
`-
`
`An in vivo study has
`.. ,_,.~-~~-~.:;-'f.""-~__, .. ~oj.'S".:k_····•:l'l-"i<<.:.~"'.\1·"~:::?<~·-t=-;~,'l-_.._., .... _~,..<, ... ""'~-'-~~~-~~;.-,.;..;_~( ... ~:".'~~~">:-'~,;:e·~~;:.:.:;:.r.:.--."'
`been conducted to assess its bioequivalence to the 20 mg Adderall XR capsule following
`a single dose of 20 mg (4x5 mg vs. 1x20 mg). The bioequivalence between the two
`strengths at the same dose has been established for both d- and /-amphetamine
`determined in this study.
`
`Major Findings:
`1. Bioequivalence (single dose, 4x5 mg vs. 1x20 mg): Bioequivalence was demonstrated
`between Adderall XR 4x5 mg capsules and Adderall XR 1x20 mg capsule in terms of
`rate and extent of absorption.
`
`2. Dissolution: Taking the 20 mg biobatch as, the reference and using the approved
`dissolution method, the value of the similarity factor for each of the new strengths
`was greater than 50, indicating thatthe dissolution profiles are similar.
`
`1
`
`Page 2 of 8
`
`

`

`Comment to the Sponsor
`
`The sponsor is requested to adopt the following dissolution method and specifications for
`all six strengths (5, 10, 15, 20,25 and 30 mg) of Adderall XR capsules:
`
`Media: -----
`
`Apparatus: USP Apparatus IT (paddle) at
`
`_;~~
`
`Specifications:
`
`Recommendation
`
`This submission (NDA 21-303/S001) has been reviewed by the Office of Clinical
`Pharmacology and Biopharmaceutics (OCPB) and has been found to be acceptable for
`allowing the approval ofthe three new strengths (5 mg, 15 mg and 25 mg). The sponsor
`is requested to adopt the dissolution methodology and specifications for all six strengths
`of Adderall XR capsules, as outlined in Comment to the Sponsor.
`
`Hong Zhao, Ph.D. __ __ _______ _
`
`RD/FT Initialed by Raman Baweja, Ph.D. ____________ _
`
`cc: NDA 21-303/S001 (Adderall XR) HFD-120, HFD-860 (Zhao, Baweja, Mehta),
`Central Documents Room (Biopharm-CDR)
`
`2
`
`Page 3 of 8
`
`

`

`Study Review
`
`In support of the addition of the new strength of Adderall XR capsule ( 5 mg) which uses
`the same delayed-release (DR) pellet and a .
`~ the sponsor has conducted a bioequivalence study comparing this new 5 mg
`strength to the approved 20 mg strength (4x5 mg to lx20 mg capsule). Comparable
`dissolution profiles are provided to support the approval of the other two new strengths
`(15 mg and 25 mg) which contain the same IR and DR pellets in the same proportions as
`the approved strengths.
`
`.. , ... -, · r-
`
`The following questions have been raised and answered through the review of this
`supplement NDA:
`
`Question 1: Are the new strengths compositionally proportional to the approved
`strengths?
`Yes. The two new strengths ( 15 mg and 25 mg) contain the same IR and DR pellets in the
`same proportions as the approved strengths. Comparable dissolution performance using
`the approved dissolution method should be sufficient to support the approval for these
`two strengths.
`
`No. The 5 mg capsule, however, uses the same DR pellets. -~~~~··=~=-
`--
`-
`~, .... ..,.........-~...,_-_,.,;,;_, .• ..,.,...,~-'l'-"·':0<;;.,..;--.~ ... 7<;..-."·"""·,;.':>-::''-"''''"'",,:!"..;:~!"·,~·-"=-....:.:: .. •·.;.o.o..;s;~,. .. -"-"'~'I.--'O;l;~.,.:.--:.-.>">';f;.r._~,,-:-.,..~,;r-""'.""""~~~-~""'-.Z!3i:IO~;;!!:; ... 'Y.~~--~~ ... n::-;-v..:..
`-
`-
`-
`-
`-
`_,.....~fll'·;..>:~~--;,.."'::.';?.~-,-·;~-;-i,~1'-<"'.i'S·;:;,....,.,.---;:~:}.;-Jjj."j!ls;:<;.-.":!:"-.':.~:;-~~·.;.!;e:<:1-".s:.;:.-:~ol_;,_~~""-"'·:>.:.;""·t..<'-·:;=";if>-'_;,'1-'.':'1L.W~~;,-L:;;::~-;.;,.-.;:..,-';1:,;>,:ifl:!l:;t':-;~.t.;S~"ci'~~~~
`S'~,,.:~,tlo]~"'~~il.:O-~-ey~A_,f.~;,t>.~~'?,;r;;~otlf~~~~~~.;: • .:.-~-,o.,·~:-::."<'~i~~:.,•.·.-c.:.,!'~~;i:.'U~~~;~c~.~":'C;~.,:.'<'-~~-?=.,._;.'..;1~;;.~9.~~ffd':~- An
`in vivo
`bioequivalence study has been conducted to support the approval of the 5 mg strength.
`
`The compositions of these new strengths are shown in the following tables:
`
`Table 1. Hard Gelatin Capsule Size and Intermediate Pellet Active Dose Amounts Used in the New
`Strengths of Adderall XR Capsules
`Adderall XR Capsules
`. Hard Gelatin
`Capsule Size
`Capsugel Size # J
`Capsugel Size # I
`Capsugel Size I.._
`
`5-mg Capsules
`15-mg Capsules
`25-mg Capsules
`
`Active Dose Amounts
`from -'IR Pellet
`from DR Pellet
`
`r i
`! - -------------------------------
`
`Table 2. Weight Percentage of Components in the Adderall XR QIR Pellets and IR Pellets
`..___ * Pellets
`IR Pellets
`Component
`Weight Percent(%)
`
`Amphetamine Aspartate
`Amphetamine Sulfate, USP
`Dextroamphetamine Saccharate
`Dextroamphetamine Sulfate, USP
`HydroxYJ>ropylmethyl Cellulose, USP
`
`Sugar Spheres ~~-~- _
`Opadry Beige ( ----~~- ,
`Total
`
`\
`____j
`
`100.00
`
`100.00
`
`3
`
`Page 4 of 8
`
`

`

`Question 2: What was the bioequivalence study design?
`This (Study 381.106) was a randomized, open-label, two-way crossover study. Twenty
`pediatric ADHD patients (17 males and 3 females) with 6 to 12 years of age received a
`single 20 mg dose of each capsule strength (4x5 mg, lot# OH2754A and 1x20 mg, lot#
`OJ2712A) under fasted conditions (an overnight fast before each of the two dosing days
`and standard meals starting 4-h post dose on test days). The two study periods were
`separated by a minimum 7-day washout interval. Blood samples were collected for 48
`hours (pre-dose, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 12, 24, and 48 hours post-doing). These
`plasma samples were analyzed for d- and /-amphetamine concentrations using a validated
`LC/MS method.
`
`The race distribution in this study was 14 Caucasians, 2 Blacks and 2 others.
`
`Question 3: Was the analytical method used for determination of amphetamine plasma
`concentrations validated?
`
`r
`
`• This analytical method has been validated with
`quantitation (LOQ) of c.:;,
`,
`acceptable results for linearity, precision and accuracy, recovery, sensitivity and stability.
`Therefore, the plasma concentrations of d-amphetamine and /-amphetamine measured by
`this assay for the bioequivalent study submitted in this supplement NDA are acceptable.
`
`Question 4: What are results of the bioequivalence study?
`Mean plasma d- and /-amphetamine concentration profiles for the two capsule strengths
`were essentially superimposable (see Figure 2-1). The mean pharmacokinetic parameters
`and the 90% confidence intervals for the ratios of the new 5 mg capsules ( 4x5 mg) to the
`approved 20 mg capsule are summarized in the following table:
`
`Table 3. Pharmacokinetic Parameters* from Study 381.106 (Pediatric ADHD Patients)
`AUCo.inr
`AUCo.t
`Cmax
`Tmax
`Single Dose
`(N=20)
`(ng.hr/m1)
`(ng/ml)
`(h)
`d-Amphetamine
`51.9±15.0
`795±179
`815±174
`AdderallXR20mg
`51.9±12.7
`844±188
`873±184
`Adderall XR 4x5 mg
`Point of Estimate (90%CI) 1.06 (1.01-1.10) 1.06 (1.01-1.12) 1.01 (0.92-1.10)
`/-Amphetamine
`15.8±4.5
`247±67
`269±59
`Adderall XR 20 mg
`16.7±4.0
`287±76
`307±69
`Adderall XR 4x5 mg
`Point of Estimate (90%CI) 1.12 (1.07-1.18) 1.16 (1.09-1.24) 1.07 (0.99-1.15)
`*Mean±SD
`
`4.9±1.9
`5.0±2.5
`
`4.5±1.7
`4.7±2.3
`
`t112
`(h)
`
`8.0±1.3
`7.9±1.0
`
`9.1±1.6
`9.0±1.1
`
`The 90% confidence intervals for Cmax, AUCo.t and AUCo.inf ford- and /-amphetamine
`were within the 0.80-1.25 window, demonstrating bioequivalence with respect to both
`compounds between the 5 mg and 20 mg capsules when administered at the same dose.
`
`4
`
`Page 5 of 8
`
`

`

`Figure 2-1 Mean plasma concentrations of d-amphetamine and }-amphetamine
`after oral administration of single 20 mg doses ofthe 5 mg and 20 mg
`ADDERALL XR™ capsules to pediatric patients (Study 381.106).
`
`0-Ampnetamine
`
`-e- 4x5mg
`~~ x20mg
`
`50
`
`40
`
`'"" 30
`~
`g
`8
`
`10
`
`12
`
`24
`
`Time(hJ
`
`36
`
`48
`
`Question 5: What was the dissolution method used to generate dissolution profiles for
`comparison between new strengths and approved strengths?
`The dissolution method used in the dissolution test was the approved dissolution method
`for Adderall XR:
`Apparatus: USP Apparatus IT (paddle) at :------
`Media:
`
`c
`
`Specifications:
`
`Question 6: Did the new strengths have similar dissolution performance as compared
`to the approved strengths?
`As illustrated in Figure 2-2, the dissolution profiles for representative lots of the six
`strengths of Adderall XR were similar. Using the 20 mg capsule as the reference,
`dissolution data and values of the similarity factor (f2) for new strengths are listed in
`Table4:
`
`Table 4. Dissolution Profile Comparison between the 20 mg Biobatch and the Proposed New
`· Strengths
`Strength
`Lot#
`
`20mg
`(OJ2702A)
`Biobatch
`
`20mg
`(9F2702)
`
`25mg
`(OF2725)
`
`5mg
`(OH2754A)
`Biobatch
`
`15mg
`(OF2719A)
`
`0.5-h
`1.0-h
`2.0-h
`2.5-h
`3.0-h
`
`Reference
`
`5
`
`Page 6 of 8
`
`

`

`The value of the similarity factor for each of the new strengths is greater than 50 as
`compared to the 20 mg biobatch, indicating that the dissolution profiles are similar.
`
`Figure 2-2 Mean Dissolution Profiles of5 mg, 10 mg, 15 mg,20 mg, 25 mg, and
`30 mg ADDERALL XR™ Capsules.
`
`100
`
`80
`
`"0
`·~
`~ 60
`
`~ =· §
`
`u
`c..·
`
`40
`
`20
`
`0
`0
`
`--a-,- 5. mg (Lot No. OH2754A)
`-e- 10 mg (Lot No. 9F2797)
`-A- 15 mg (Lot No. OF2719A)
`-'ii'-: 20 mg (Lot No. 9F2702)
`~ 25 mg (Lot No. OF2725)
`--&:- 30 mg (Lot No. 9F2703)
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`Time (h)
`
`6
`
`Page 7 of 8
`
`

`

`This is a representation of an electronic record that was signed electronically and
`this page is the manifestation of the electronic signature.
`
`/s/
`
`Hong Zhao
`2/11/02 10:25:51 AM
`BIOPHARMACEUTICS
`
`Raman Baweja
`2/11/02 01:32:30 PM
`BIOPHARMACEUTICS
`
`Page 8 of 8
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket