throbber
ELSEVIER International Journal of Pharmaceutics 140 (19~6) 131 143 international journal of pharmaceutics Invited review Dissolution testing for sustained or controlled release oral dosage forms and correlation with in vivo data: challenges and opportunities M. Zahirul I. Khan Research and Development Laboratories, Sigma Pharmaceuticals Pty. Ltd., 432 Mount Dandenong Road, Croydon, Melbourne, Victoria 3136, Australia Abstract Despite the fact that dissolution tests were first introduced to characterise the release profile of low solubility ( < 1%) drugs in aqueous media, the emphasis is now to adopt dissolution tests in monographs of almost all oral solid dosage forms in most pharmacopoeias. This is attributable mainly to the growing demand by both regulatory authorities and pharmaceutical industries of more in vivo predictability of the release and absorption behaviours of drug(s) from the dosage form by means of in vitro tests, i.e. in vitro-in vivo correlation. Dissolution testing is also essential in various stages of formulation development for screening and proper assessment of different formulations. Although dissolution tests have been successfully implemented on conventional dosage forms, there are enormous difficulties in establishing proper dissolution test conditions and parameters for testing sustained or controlled release oral dosage forms because of prolonged gastrointestinal residence of the dosage form and variabilities in physiological conditions of the gastrointestinal tract. This review focuses on the challenges faced by formulation scientists and regulatory authorities in generalising the dissolution test conditions and parameters for testing sustained or controlled release dosage forms, and describes some recent trends and progress in overcoming some of these challenges. Keywords: Dissolution testing; Dissolution media; In vitro-in vivo correlation; Controlled release: Sustained release; Extended release; Food effect; Dissolution review I. Introduction Prior to the emergence of dissolution tests as being official in the United States Pharmacopeia (USP) in the early 1960s, disintegration tests were the only official in vitro tests used by major pharmacopoeias throughout the world as means of in vivo release predictability and product per- formance. Although the disintegration test is only indirectly related to drug bioavailability (Cohen et al., 1990), this test has been the number one choice for the pharmaceutical industry in assess- 0378-5173/96/$15.00 ~ 1996 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved PII S0378-5173(96)0456 1-9
`
`Page 1
`
`SHIRE EX. 2041
`KVK v. SHIRE
`IPR2018-00293
`
`

`

`132 M.Z.L Khan /International Journal of Pharmaceutics 140 (1996) 131-143 ing the quality and performance of any conven- tional oral solid dosage form. This is perhaps due to the fact that this test is inexpensive, quick and does not require skilled personnel. With modernisation of technology, advance- ment in research in drug delivery and more em- phasis on in vivo predictability of therapeutic effect by means of in vitro tests, dissolution tests have been gaining more and more popularity. Initially, dissolution tests were introduced to char- acterise the release profiles of low solubility (< 1%) drugs in aqueous media. But now the emphasis is to adopt dissolution tests in mono- graphs of all oral solid dosage forms with minor exceptions (e.g. nonabsorbed drugs). Not surpris- ingly, any report in literature on formulation and development of any solid dosage form starts with dissolution testing. The dissolution tests have been successfully im- plemented on conventional dosage forms, and generalised monographs described in pharmaco- poeias are usually sufficient to test any such new formulation. Unfortunately, this is not the case with sustained or controlled release dosage forms. Formal guidelines to evaluate sustained or con- trolled release products do not exist. The current trend is to evaluate each and every sustained or controlled release dosage form on individual ba- sis. The formulation scientists and regulatory au- thorities face an enormous challenge of generalising the test conditions for dissolution testing because most individual drug candidates for sustained or controlled release dosage forms and their delivery design possess diverse physico- chemical and pharmacokinetic properties requir- ing specific considerations. The difficulties are also in simulating in vivo conditions in in vitro. Since most sustained or controlled release prepa- rations are designed for prolonged release and therapeutic effect, variabilities in in vivo condi- tions (such as presence and nature of food in the gastrointestinal tract, time of the day the dosage form is administered) which can substantially af- fect the release profile of the drug are bound to happen. The formulation aspects of sustained or con- trolled release oral dosage forms for some water soluble drugs were addressed in a recent review (Khan, 1995). The overall design aspects of sus- tained/controlled release dosage forms were also addressed by other reviewers (Caramella et al., 1995). But despite significant emphasis given on dissolution testing of sustained or controlled re- lease dosage forms by regulatory authorities (Skelley et al., 1990; AAPS/FDA Workshop Committee, 1995) the difficulties faced by formu- lation scientists and regulatory authorities in gen- eralising the test conditions have not been addressed in recent years. Almost a decade ago, Thoma (1987) discussed dissolution testing and bioavailability of various dosage forms covering sustained/controlled release preparations briefly, but ever since, the sustained/controlled release technology has progressed substantially. The main objective of this review is to focus on various factors that deserve consideration during dissolu- tion testing of sustained or controlled release oral dosage forms and to summarise the recent trends and progress in overcoming these difficulties with an emphasis on in vivo predictability. This review would be helpful in selecting dissolution test con- ditions for sustained or controlled release oral dosage forms in early stages of development and during quality control and performance checks. The term 'extended release' has been used throughout this review in place of both 'sustained release' and 'controlled release' terminologies. 2. Dissolution media and test conditions 2.1. Challenges in selecting dissolution media The dissolution test plays an important role both in the development process of a new formu- lation and as a means of production control. Perhaps for regular performance check and pro- duction control it is not so important for the dissolution method to produce a dissolution profile which is superimposable to the in vivo release profile of the drug, provided the method is discriminatory enough to differentiate formula- tions which would have different in vivo perfor- mance. But from the formulation view point it is extremely important that at various stages of de- velopment the formulator is able to test the re-
`
`Page 2
`
`

`

`M.Z.1. Khan / International Journal of Pharmaceutics 140 (1996) 131-143 133 lease profile of the drug in an environment which would closely relate to the actual in vivo condi- tions, particularly for dosage forms which would have different release/absorption profiles at vari- ous physiological conditions of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract. This justifies a critical assessment of the physiological conditions an extended release dosage form passes throughout its total residence time in the body. Therefore, in an ideal situation, an extended release oral dosage form should be tested in vitro throughout the entire physiological pH (1-7.8) of the GI tract in order to simulate the in vivo conditions. But the difficulties are in determining the time interval which should closely relate to a particular pH segment of the in vivo condition. Even the type of buffer species in the dissolution medium (at a particular pH) was reported to influence significantly the release profile of dilti- azem hydrochloride from extended release dosage forms coated with Eudragit RS and RL (Bodmeier et al., 1996). The physico-chemical and physiolog- ical properties of the GI fluid where release of the drug from the administered dosage form occurs are determined by many factors (particularly for extended release dosage forms); notably: (a) the state of the stomach when the dosage form is taken, i.e. whether it is taken in an empty stomach or after meal, (b) the nature of food and build up of mucus, and (c) excipients of the dosage form itself and co-current administration of other drugs. On an empty stomach an oral dosage form is known to reach the intestine in as little as 10 rain (Vidgren et al., 1991), whereas in a fed stomach an extended release pellet formulation had gastric emptying times of 119-285 min depending on the size of food administered (light vs. heavy) (Davis et al., 1984). The presence of food in the stomach also influenced the integrity of orally administered pellets; from empty stomachs the pellets came out as boluses, but from fed stomachs, spreading of the pellets occurred (Hunter et al., 1982; Davis et al., 1987; Fischer et al., 1987). There are also contradicting reports in literature about food in- duced changes in absorption and bioavailability of drugs from the dosage forms indicating no changes (Davis et al., 1990; Wilding et al., 1992), enhanced absorption (Marvola et al., 1987, 1989) or reduced bioavailability (Digenis et al., 1990; Ogiso et. al., 1994; Nazareno et al., 1995) com- pared to fasting conditions. The enhanced plasma levels or bioabsorption of verapamil from ex- tended release dosage forms due to the presence of food was explained as due to increased GI resi- dence time of the dosage forms in the stomach where absorption of the drug is favoured (Mar- vola et al., 1987, 1989). 'The interaction of the gastrointestinal tract with sustained release dosage forms is highly complex and dynamic and con- trolled, in part, by transit of the product through the stomach and intestine' (Liaw et al., 1990). Not only the presence of food but also its extent (i.e. heavy or light, single or succession of meals) and nature (fatty or fibrous) determine the degree of effect on drug absorption or bioavailability. Single meal or succession of meals taken before dosage form administration made enormous differ- ences in GI residence times of bilayer floating capsules of misoprostol (Oth et al., 1992). The capsules took 199 min to pass the stomach after a single meal compared to 618 min after a succession of meals. Wilson et al. (1991) reported a gastric emptying time of 2.2 h following oral administra- tion of an extended release buflomedil HC1 formu- lation in healthy humans after a light breakfast compared to 6.2 h after a heavy breakfast, al- though small intestinal transit time was unaffected by the meal size. The difference in gastric emptying time was also reflected in the time to reach peak plasma concentration (Tmax) of the drug showing 4 and 6 h following light and heavy meals. The presence of a heavy breakfast caused extended GI transit time and greater spreading within the small intestine of extended release pellet formulations than caused by light breakfasts (Davis et al., 1984, 1987). Dietary fibre modified small intestinal tran- sit of pellet and tablet dosage forms causing slower overall transit in vegetarians than in omnivores (Price et al., 1991). The bioavailability of theo- phytline in healthy humans from various extended release formulations were significantly influenced by the presence of 'high fat' breakfast compared to fasting condition causing either increased or de- creased rate and extent of absorption depending on the type of formulation (Karim et al., 1985).
`
`Page 3
`
`

`

`134 M.Z.I. Khan /International Journal of Pharmaceutics 140 (1996) 131-143 Even the type of oily food (emulsion) present in the stomach made a difference in bioavailability (Tmax) of propranolol when studied in rats (Ogiso et al., 1994). The peak plasma concentration (Cmax) of propranolol administered orally to rats having 20% soybean oil emulsion was delayed compared with rats having a 20% lauric acid- oleic acid emulsion. For obvious reasons, the presence of fatty food in the stomach can have a substantial effect on release profiles of lipophilic drugs or from dosage forms that control the release process on the basis of hydrophilicity. Other notable factors related to the presence of food in stomach include changes in pH of the gastric fluid that occur as a result of food con- sumption, and secretion of various enzymes (e.g. pepsin in the stomach) and chemicals (e.g. bile salts in the intestine). The pH of gastric fluid of an empty normal human stomach is between 1.2 and 2.5 which rises to about 4.5 after ingestion of food. Another parameter of the dissolution medium which plays a significant role in the dissolution process is its ionic strength (Bodmeier et al., 1996). Dissolution behaviours of extended release formulations which use hydrophilic gel forming polymers, such as hydroxypropyl methylcellulose (HPMC), are known to be significantly affected by any changes in ionic strength of the dissolution media. Certain ionic salts and drugs were reported to cause failure to some HPMC-based extended release products (Fagan et al., 1989). Extended release diclofenac sodium tablets prepared in the form of HPMC matrices had significantly differ- ent release profiles in dissolution media of differ- ent ionic strength but same pH (6.8), and the changes in dissolution rates as a function of ionic strength of the dissolution media did not have any direct relationship (Chetty et al., 1994). Some commercially available diclofenac sodium ex- tended release tablets (Voltaren ® SR, Ciba-Geigy Canada Ltd., Mississauga, Canada), showed sig- nificantly different release profiles in phosphate buffers (pH 6.8) of various ionic strength (Fig. 1). But this contradicts a report by Chetty et al. (1994) who found that similar tablets (Voltarol Retard) manufactured also by Ciba (Basle, Switzerland), known to be wax matrix tablets, had identical dissolution profiles in phosphate buffers (pH 6.8) of different ionic strengths. Jalil and Ferdous (1993) reported the dissolution vari- ability of theophylline extended release granules prepared using HPMC as a retarding agent as a function of ionic strength of the dissolution me- dia. They found an exponential increase in the dissolution rate of theophylline from these gran- ules against increasing ionic strengths of the disso- lution media; whereas, in an earlier study, Li Wan Poet al. (1990) found an initial decrease followed by an increase in dissolution rate of theophylline from a commercially available extended release matrix tablet formulation (Lasma ®) with increases in ionic strength of the dissolution media. The presence of ions (e.g. Na ÷) in the dosage form itself was reported to cause a rapid disintegration of extended release HPMC matrix tablets (Rajabi- Siahboomi et al., 1994). The mechanism of action of ions in dissolution profiles of HPMC and other cellulose ether-based extended release dosage forms has been explained as due to changes in thermal gelation point (TGP) of these polymers that occur due to dehydrating effect of electrolytes on these polymers. The TGP, which is a critical temperature point, determines the sol to gel tran- sition of the polymers in aqueous media, and is depressed by ions causing failure to the system (Fagan et al., 1989; Rajabi-Siahboomi et al., A m P "o o o 75- 50- 25- L/ Time (hours) Fig. 1. Dissolution profiles of a commercially available diclofe- nac sodium (Voltaren ® SR) extended release tablet in phos- phate buffers (pH 6.8) of two different ionic strengths. Vertical bars representing standard errors of the means (n = 6) are within the points where not visible.
`
`Page 4
`
`

`

`M.Z.I. Khan /International Journal of Pharmaceutics 140 (1996) 131-143 t35 1994). Jalil and Ferdous (1993) further linked this effect of electrolytes to factors like (i) increased surface erosion and dissolution of polymer chains and (ii) increased osmotic pressure created due to higher ionic strength in the dissolution media. In another study, Hamaguchi et al. (1995) re- ported that an increase in ionic strength (to a certain extent) of dissolution media (pH 5.0-5.8) resulted in an increase in dissolution rate of sulpiride from tablets film-coated with a polyelec- trolyte, polyvinylacetal diethylaminoacetate. The increased dissolution rate was explained as due to increased solubility of the film-coating polymer in the dissolution media with higher ionic strength. As previously stated, presence of food in the stomach can induce secretion of various chemicals in the GI tract causing changes in ionic strength of the GI fluid. The presence of ions in food itself is also not unique making it difficult to generalise the ionic strength of dissolution media used to test extended release dosage forms. This emphasises the importance of screening extended release for- mulations during development stages in dissolu- tion media with various ionic strengths so that a proper judgement of the developed formulation(s) can be made during in vitro studies in order to avoid any possible in vivo failures. As is the case with conventional dosage forms for poorly water-soluble drugs, the selection of appropriate dissolution medium for extended re- lease dosage forms containing poorly water-solu- ble drugs is also complicated due to the difficulties in achieving sink conditions during the dissolution test. Among other methods, addition of a solu- biliser to the test medium to improve the solubil- ity of the drug has been tried successfully to overcome this problem (Wingstrand et al., 1990; Abrahamsson et at., 1994; Shah et al., 1995). 2.2. Challenges in selecting dissolution test parameters The difference in GI residence times of adminis- tered dosage forms in fed and fasted objects is mainly caused by a physiological factor, motility pattern of the GI tract, which is completely differ- ent in fed and fasted humans and animals that consume food on a discrete basis (Liaw et al., 1990). Most extended release products are not disintegrating; hence, it is important that in vivo hydrodynamic conditions are properly simulated during dissolution testing. But the variability in motility patterns of the GI tract in fasted and fed objects complicates the task of setting a unique agitation condition during in vitro testing. Disso- lution studies performed on TA-5707F wax ma- trix extended release tablets by the JP (XII) disintegration method (30 strokes/min, no disk) were found to correlate with the physiological state of GI tract of fasted beagle dogs better than when the studies were performed by the JP (XII) paddle method (100 rev./min) due to stronger frictional forces generated by the disintegration method (Yamakita et al., 1995). Since the human body temperature is about 37°C, standard dissolution testing is carried out at this temperature with an allowable variation of _+0.5°C in most pharmacopoeias. But a report exists about significant differences in dissolution profiles of some commercially available extended release solid dosage forms containing isosorbide dinitrite tested at various temperatures within this specified range of 36.5-37.5°C (Kaniwa et al., 1995). 3. Dissolution apparatuses An ideal dissolution apparatus for extended release product should be able to tackle at least some of the challenges (as stated above) that the formulation scientists face in simulating in vivo conditions. The apparatus would be capable of simulating (i) the entire pH range of the GI tract according to the desire of the formulation scien- tist, (ii) food induced physiological changes (at least in part) that occur in the GI tract, and (iii) the motility pattern and other mechanical forces encountered by the dosage form in the GI tract. Currently available dissolution apparatuses are based on two distinct methodologies, either a closed or an open system (M611er and Wirbitzki, 1993). The majority of studies focusing on disso- lution profiles of extended release products use USP dissolution apparatus with either paddle or basket method which is designed as a closed
`
`Page 5
`
`

`

`136 M.Z.L Khan / International Journal of Pharmaceuties 140 (1996) 131-143 system. The apparatus is well designed for most conventional dosage forms and hence, its popu- larity. Despite its significant use, the USP ap- paratus with paddle and basket methods suffers serious set backs in assessing dissolution profiles of extended release products. Firstly, the system does not allow an automatic flow of the dissolu- tion media with variable pHs as required for testing of extended release products. Changing dissolution media manually is laborious, time consuming and often lacks accuracy in analyti- cal precision. Secondly, the system is also not suitable for dosage forms with very low solubil- ity drugs because of its limited ability to main- tain sink condition for the drug. Thirdly, dos- age forms, such as floating capsules or tablets, pellets, can not be positioned appropriately in this system to test their dissolution properties. Moreover, the standard agitation rates (50 rev./ min for paddle and 100 rev./min for basket methods) used during dissolution studies with this apparatus were found not discriminatory enough to screen various brands of solid dosage forms (Dahl et al., 1990; Komuro et al., 1991). Two extended release formulations of in- domethacin were found bioinequivalent in hu- mans despite compliance of both the formulations with USP dissolution specifications (Tandt et al., 1994). To overcome some of these difficulties several modifications have been suggested in literature (Table 1), but none of these modified methods is comprehensive enough to be adopted for testing of various types of extended release products. Aoki et al. (1992) studied dissolution profiles of phenylpropanolamine HC1 extended release tablets and compared the USP paddle method (set at 100 rev./min) and a paddle-beads method with results obtained from in vivo studies using beagle dogs. The authors found that the USP paddle method lacked in vitro-in vivo correla- tion in contrast to the paddle-beads method which showed good correlation. The paddle- beads method was a modification of the paddle method which had some polystyrene beads in- serted into the dissolution medium to cause some frictional force or mechanical destruction to the studied dosage form (Fig. 2). A commer- cially available modified form of the USP closed system (basket method) is known as 'Bio-Dis', manufactured by Vankel Industries, Inc. (Edison, USA). The system is computerised and capable of transporting the studied dosage form through a number of dissolution media (e.g. with various pHs) during the run without opera- tor's involvement. Nevertheless, the system can- not use the paddle method and is expensive. A popular alternative to the USP paddle or basket methods is the flow-through cell method which is an open system. Although the method has been in use during the last 30 years, it be- came an official alternative to the paddle or bas- ket methods in pharmacopoeias recently (USP XXII and Ph. Eur. 2). The flow-through method, capable of maintaining a continuous flow of the dissolution medium, was shown to have superiority over the paddle or basket method in testing dissolution profiles of ex- tended release dosage forms (Komuro et al., 1991), and has the potential to be used on a regular basis in future for dissolution studies of extended release products (Komuro et al., 1991; M611er and Wirbitzki, 1993), particularly, those requiring frequent changes of the dissolution media. In a study with theophylline extended release preparations, EI-Arini et al. (1990) used a rotat- ing dialysis cell method to investigate the effect of food-induced physiological changes on disso- lution behaviours of the extended release prod- ucts. The dialysis cell method is a form of combination of both USP basket and flow- through cell methods. In this system, a small dialysis cell containing the dosage form and a small volume of fluid is immersed in the dissolu- tion medium contained in a dissolution vessel. The dialysis is mobilised by a continuous hori- zontal rotation and the product is in continuous contact with the dissolution medium through the cell membrane (Fig. 3). Flexibility in changing the fluid inside the dialysis cell allows simulation of gastrointestinal conditions, such as, pH effect, food effect, and the like. The method was found useful in simulating food-induced factors during dissolution studies (EI-Arini et al., 1990).
`
`Page 6
`
`

`

`Table 1 Modifications proposed to standard pharmacopoeial dissolution methods for testing of extended release dosage forms to study the effect of variuos physiological and other factors Factor(s) studied Modification proposed Drug/dosage form Results Reference used GI motility/mucin plugs Paddle-bead method -- Paddle Phenyl- The modified method resulted in a Aoki et al. (1992) method with polystyrene beads in- propanolamine better in vitro-in vivo correlation serted into the dissolution medium Ha/matrix tablet than the paddle method when com- pH of the GI tract/food induced changes pared with the release profile ob- tained in fasted beagle dogs The method allowed testing of the extended release dosage forms under various food induced conditions High fat food High fat food Fatty food Poor aqueous solubility of the drug Poor aqueous solubility of the drug A dialysis cell containing the dosage form in a small volume of fluid is immersed in the dissolution medium in a dissolution vessel. The physio- logical conditions are simulated by adjusting the fluid of the dialysis cell Pretreatment of the dosage form (or content) in peanut oil for 2 h prior to standard dissolution testing Pretreatment of the dosage form content in peanut oil for 1 h at 37°C prior to standard dissolution testing Theophylline/ beads, either em- bedded in matrix tablet or filled in capsule Theophylline/ma- trix tablet, and beads filled in capsule Propranolol HCl/ capsule Milk with various levels of fat con- tent (0.1%, 2.0%, 5.0% and 7.5%) was used as dissolution medium Theophylline/ma- trix tablet, and capsule Addition of solubiliser in the dissolu- Felodipine/matrix tion medium, and a stationary bas- tablet ket to hold the dosage form above the paddle to achieve reproducible hydrodynamic conditions Addition of solubiliser in the dissolu- Felodipine/matrix tion medium tablet EI-Arini et al. (1990) The in vitro dissolution data corre- Maturu et al. 0986) lated well with in vivo percent dis- solved in humans after high fat breakfast A significant decrease in dissolution E1-Arini et al. 0989) rate of the drug was observed as a result of pretreatment of the dosage form with peanut oil when com- pared with untreated dosage form A direct relationship was established Macheras et al. (1989) between fat contents of milk and dissolution data with a good corre- lation between data obtained using 7.5% fat content milk and in vivo data obtained in humans after a high fat meal The method produced dissolution data with good in vitro-in vivo cor- relation, and was capable of dis- criminating formulations with different in vivo performance The method provided data with a good in vitro-in vivo correlation, and the choice of solubiliser af- fected the results Wingstrand et al. (1990) Abrahamsson et al. (1994) ~q ga t.o
`
`Page 7
`
`

`

`138 M.Z.1. Khan / International Journal of Pharmaceutics 140 (1996) 131-143 V-- J 0 (c) --q Fig. 2. Illustration of a dissolution apparatus (JP11) modified to cause frictional force to simulate gastrointestinal motility: (a) matrix tablet, (b) polystyrene beads, and (c) paddle. Repro- duced from Aoki et al. (1992) with permission from Elsevier Science B.V. found a direct relationship between fat contents of milk and dissolution data of some extended re- lease theophylline dosage forms, and dissolution profiles obtained in milk with 7.5% fat had a good correlation with in vivo data obtained in humans after a high fat meal. Similarly, the effect of enzymes and bile salts has been studied by adding these substances to the dissolution media (E1- Arini et al., 1990). 5. In vitro-in vivo correlation The ultimate goal of performing dissolution tests on dosage forms is to characterise their biopharmaceutical properties and to predict the extent of release and absorption of the adminis- tered drug in vivo. Therefore, the in vitro test conditions should reflect an ideal in vivo situation so that the data obtained during dissolution stud- ies would eventually correlate well with in vivo 4. Some attempts in simulating food-induced conditions in vitro As described earlier, the effects of food induced conditions are enormous which cannot be gener- alised as unique set up conditions. The current trend is to study each and every extended release product under such experimental conditions which are likely to have an effect on the release process of the drug from the particular dosage form. Table 1 summarises some recent develop- ments in studying the food induced conditions in vitro. The effect of fatty food has been investigated by adding oil in dissolution media (E1-Arini et al., 1990) or by pretreating the dosage forms with peanut oil (Maturu et al., 1986; E1-Arini et al., 1989) or by using milk as dissolution medium (Macheras et al., 1989). Dissolution profiles of some theophylline extended release dosage forms after pretreatment with oil or without any pre- treatment were found to correlate well with in vivo percent dissolved in humans after high fat breakfast and in fasting conditions, respectively (Maturu et al., 1986). Macheras et al. (1989) Fig. 3. Illustration of a rotating dialysis cell apparatus for in vitro testing. 1, Drive shaft; 2, gear drive; 3, glass vessel; 4, temperature sensor; 5, agitator plate; 6, dialysis membrane; 7, O-ring; 8, dialysis cell; 9, plastic insert supporting membrane. Reproduced from EI-Arini et al. (1990) with permission from Plenum Publishing Corporation, New York.
`
`Page 8
`
`

`

`M.Z.I. Khan /International Journal of Pharmaceutics 140 (1996) 131--143 139 performance. Extended release performance ob- tained in vitro does not necessarily mean that the formulation will perform similarly in vivo. For example, an extended release solid dosage form prepared from cholesterol to deliver a model anti- gen released about 20% of the antigen in 8 h with no further release for up to 15 days when studied in vitro (Khan et al., 1991); whereas, the same dosage form released about 60% of the antigen in 2 days when tested in mice (Khan et al., 1993). Three different extended release diclofenac sodium tablet formulations with similar in vitro release profiles in simulated intestinal fluid (with- out enzymes) exhibited different plasma drug lev- els when tested in humans (Dahl et al., 1990). Contradicting reports of good bioavailability with poor in vitro dissolution profiles also exist. Two commercially available different brands of theophylline extended release products with sig- nificantly different dissolution profiles in simu- lated gastric fluid (pH 1.2) for 1 h and then in simulated intestinal fluid for 11 h were bioequiva- lent when tested in humans (A1-Angary et al., 1990). The utilisation of in vitro dissolution data for predicting in vivo performance requires a mean- ingful method of transformation of the data. A direct comparison between in vitro and in vivo data is not possible since the measurement of in vivo release/absorption profiles is not straightfor- ward. There are also arguments about appropri- ateness of using classical single (experimental) point pharmacokinetic parameters like Cm~x and Tma x to assess bioavailability/bioequivalence of extended release preparations (Bailer et al., 1995). Various mathematical models and equations have been described in literature for conversion of di- rectly measurable pharmacokinetic data to re- lease/absorption characteristic of the drug from the dosage form for comparison with in vitro dissolution data (Wagner and Nelson, 1963; Lan- genbucher, 1982; Hattingberg, 1984; Liu et al., 1995). It is beyond the scope of this review to discuss all these models in detail. Mathematical equations for extended release dosage forms were derived as early as 1960 to calculate in vivo plasma levels of drugs on the basis of in vitro dissolution data (Wiegand and Taylor, 1960). De- pending on the

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket