throbber
PHARMACEUTICAL
`,TE C H N O L O G Y
`
`voLu
`ME 7 NUMBER 9
`
`SEPT 1983
`
`$4 . 00
`
`Page 1 of 18
`
`KVK-TECH EXHIBIT 1025
`
`

`

`r=== ==-===================== === ===a.;;;;--------------------------------=:ar.s~......--
`PHARMACEUTICAL TECHNOLOGY, September 198 3
`124
`
`The for gotten dosage form:
`enteric-coated tablets
`
`WALTER G . C HAMBLISS
`
`T HE RECENT INTRODUCTION of
`
`transdennal delivery systems and other
`controlled-release dosage forms has demon(cid:173)
`strated the ingenuity of the pham1aceutical
`development scientist. The number of poten(cid:173)
`tial dosage forms available for a new drug
`has never been higher. There is, however,
`one dosage form that appears to have been
`forgotten: the coterie-coated tablet.
`An entcric-coated tablet is designed to re(cid:173)
`sist the dcst ructive act ion of the gastric nu id
`and to disintegrate in the intestinal tract. '
`Reasons for applying an ente ric coat to a
`drug product include:' ..
`• preventing the drug's destruction by gas(cid:173)
`tric enzymes or by the acidity of gastric
`fluid
`• preventing nausea and vomiting caused
`by the drug's irritation of the gastric
`mucosa
`• delivering the drug to its local s ite of
`action in the intestine
`• providing delayed action
`• delivering a drug primarily absorbed in
`the intestine to that site at the highest pos(cid:173)
`s ible conce ntration.
`This presentation will review the history of
`this dosage form and examine the reasons
`for its apparent demise.
`
`Basic Studies
`Jn 1965, Schroeter published a review of
`over 60 materials that have been used as en(cid:173)
`teric coating matcrials,4 referring to studies
`that found both favorable and unfavorable
`in vivo performances for tablets coated with
`those materials. The four basic types of c n(cid:173)
`tcric coating materials are water-resistant
`fiJms, pH-sensitive films. materials digest(cid:173)
`ed by intestinal nuid , and materials that
`s lowly swell and dissolve after exposure to
`moisture. 2 The pH-sensitive films have re(cid:173)
`ceived the most attention in the literature.
`Indeed , e nteric products introduced recent(cid:173)
`ly seem to be manufactured exclusively
`with this ty pe of coating.'
`
`pH-Sensitive Films
`As the name implies, pH-sensitive film is
`directly affected by the pH of the GI tract.
`
`The film must be insoluble in gastric tluid
`but dissolve rapidly in intestinal tluid. Table
`I lists pH values found in the G I tract.'' The
`usuaJ pH of gastric f1uid ranges from I .0 to
`3.5. Fasting generally reduces the pH value
`to a level between I .2 and 1.8. and G I dis(cid:173)
`eases and drugs such as histamine H-2 an(cid:173)
`lagonisLs, amichol inergics, and antacids are
`also known to affect pH. 7
`Enterie films that are pH-sens itive consist
`of a long-chain polymer with ionizable car(cid:173)
`boxyl groups. In the low-pH environment
`of the gastric fluid, the acid g roups arc un(cid:173)
`ionized and arc therefore poorly water solu(cid:173)
`ble. When the tablet empties from the stom(cid:173)
`ach into the sma ll intestine, a dramatic
`change in pH occurs: ionization of the acid
`groups and , therefore, increased water sol(cid:173)
`ubility occurs in the intestinal tract as
`shown in the following equation:
`
`R - COOH + OH" ... R - coo· + H2O
`
`The equilibrium constant for Lhe reaction is
`a function of the p H o f the medium and the
`apparent PK. of the film . 1 The Hende rson(cid:173)
`Hasselbach equation may be used to predict
`the ratio of the concentration of the ionized
`to un-ionized acid groups based upon the
`pH oflhe medium a11d the pK. of the film :7
`
`K _
`pH - P O -
`
`concentratio n (ionized)
`1
`og concentration (un-ionized)
`
`Enteric films that are pH-sensitive should
`have a pK, between 4 and 6. At a pH level
`two units below the pK. of the acid groups.
`for instance, only I % of the acid groups on
`the polyme r will be ionized - which ex(cid:173)
`plains the low solubi lity of the cote rie mate-
`
`Tbble I: Range of pH values i11 the Gt tmct.
`
`GI Area
`
`Stomach
`Duodenum
`Jejunum
`Ileum
`Colon
`Rectum
`
`pH Value
`
`1.0- 3.5
`6.5- 7.6
`6.3- 7.3
`7.6
`7.9- 8.0
`7.8
`
`r ial in the gastric fluid . As p H is incrcase<.:l_
`the equilibrium of the reaction shifts to th -
`right. and the percentage of ionized aci<.J
`groups increases.
`In the intestine, pH exceeds Lhe pK11 of th~
`acid group by two to four units. the pcrccn t_
`age of ionized g roups approaches I 00 %
`a nd the polymer making up the film b~ .
`comes water soluble . 2 Ion izat io n of the aciu
`groups causes a charge repulsion within th~
`polymer. leading to a stre tching of the po l} - _
`mer chain. 8 Stretching Lhc chain a llows w ._'t. _
`ter to penetrate to the tablet core. resulting,
`in tablet disintegration.'
`The pH-sensi tive film s that have been
`studied include shellac .0 ce llulose ace tate:
`phthalme. "1
`0 cellulose acetate succ in;ite . ,..,.
`'
`half-e sters of the co polymer po lyvin y l
`methyl e ther/ maleic anhydride. '~ mcth _
`acrylic acid/ methyl methacryh1te copol _
`mer, '0 polyvinyl acetate phthalatc.~' und hy _
`droxypropyl methylccllulosc phthalatc . ~
`Two of these polymers -
`shellac and cl!! I u -
`lose acetate phthalate - will be discussed i 11
`detail in the fo llowing sectio ns.
`Shellac. Shellac, a long-chain polymer of
`esters of aleuriticacid. was introduced as an
`enteric coating material by Wruble i 11
`1930. 9 Although once used extensively in
`the industry. shellac is no longer the poly(cid:173)
`mer of c hoice for entc ric-coated tablet~.
`Shellac has an apparent pKJ between 6. 9
`and 7.5, a nd this high value leads to poor
`solubility of the film in the duodenum .
`where the pH is genera lly slightly acidic:
`delayed intestinal release of the drug may
`therefore occur.z
`The sta bility of shellac has also been crit i(cid:173)
`cized. Luce reponed that marked change:-.
`in disintegration times occurred in she llac(cid:173)
`coated dicalcium phosphate tablets aft..:r
`storage at room te mperature for one year.
`Before storage, Lablcts disintegrated in in(cid:173)
`testinal fluid within 50 min: a fter storage .
`they fa iled to disintegrate within 120 min .
`The stability of the dosage form may also be
`intluenced by the grade of shellac; ~everal
`grades arc commerc ially ava ilable. USP
`recognizes two basic grades: orange shellac
`(wax o r dcwaxed), and bleached or refi ned
`
`Page 2 of 18
`
`

`

`Eastman C-A-P™
`•
`e 1vers.
`
`Enteric Coating Mater1al
`
`Eastman C-A-P-Cellulose Acetate Phthalate-as an
`enteric coating can give your tablets an elegant, appealing
`finish. But there's more to the effectiveness of this free(cid:173)
`flowing white powder than meets the eye.
`Because of their excellent enteric properties, coat(cid:173)
`ings of C-A-P withstand prolonged contact with gastric
`juices but readi ly dissolve in intestina l fluids. So, one coat(cid:173)
`ing material delivers both elegance and protection.
`Also, impressions made in the tablet are visible
`through the finish, thus eliminating the need for printing
`the coated tablets.
`For more information about C-A-P for enteric coat(cid:173)
`ings, contact Gunther Doerfert, 615-229-3797, or write
`him at Eastman Chemical Products, Inc., a subsidiary of
`Eastman Kodak Company, Kingsport,Tennessee 37662.
`
`Eastman~ C-A-P™
`
`t I • Hid A •• "' 1" J ,. ,, Id,
`
`I
`
`IJ.••
`
`Circle Reader Service Card No. 74
`Thu; m ateri al wu copied
`
`Page 3 of 18
`
`

`

`PHARMACEUTICAL TECHNOLOGY September 1983
`
`126
`
`shellac (wax or dewaxed).21 It has been re(cid:173)
`ported that alcohol solutions of orange shel(cid:173)
`lac arc more stable than arc corresponding
`solutions of bleached shellac: bleached
`shellac tends to estcrify faster because re(cid:173)
`sidual chlorine lowers the pH_ n (The 1ablc1s
`in the study by Luce c ited ea rlie r used
`bleached shellac .)
`Cellulose acetate phthalate. Cellulose
`acetate phthalate (CA P) is a white, free(cid:173)
`fl owing powder prepared by reacting a par(cid:173)
`tial acetate ester of cellulose with phlhalic
`anhydride. The cellulose polymer used in
`the reaction has a molec ular weight be(cid:173)
`tween 2000 and 8000. and the final product
`contai ns 30% to 36% combined phthalyl
`and 19% to 23.5% combined acctyl. Ap(cid:173)
`proximately one-half of the available hy(cid:173)
`droxy groups in the cellulose chain arc acct(cid:173)
`ylated; one-fourth arc estcrified with one
`of the two phthalic acid groups. 1° Figure I
`shows the structure of cellulose and a repre(cid:173)
`sentative structure o f CAP. n
`CAP. the most widely used cnicric coal(cid:173)
`ing material . was introduced by Hiatt in
`1940. 11 Couvrcur conducted an extensive
`study o f cnteric coating o f tablets and con(cid:173)
`cluded that CAP combined all of the quali(cid:173)
`ties required of a true e nteric coating. In(cid:173)
`deed. Couvreur found that C AP was the
`only material testccl that responded exactly
`to the requirements . u
`Zatz and Knowles studied the effect of pH
`on CAP monomers. From pH 2 10 pH 4, the
`CAP monomers were observed 10 be in a
`compact form . As the pH changed from 4 10
`6. however. ionization of the acid groups
`occurred; the greatest effect o n film stabili(cid:173)
`ty was seen at pH 6. 24
`A controversy has developed in the litera(cid:173)
`ture concerning the role of pancreatic ester(cid:173)
`ascs in the disintegration of CAP-coated
`tablets. Bauer and Masucci attributed disin(cid:173)
`tegration of CAP-coated tablets in slightly
`alkaline pancreatic fluid to the hydrolytic
`e ffect of the cstcrascs and not to a pH cf.
`fcct, " while Payne found thai a pancreatin
`concentration of 3 g/L had no signi(icant ef(cid:173)
`fect on the in vitro dis integration time of
`CAP-coated tablcts. 1
`'
`Lo ng-te rm toxic iry studies in rats and
`dogs performed as early as 1944 showed
`that C AP was very safe . Rats had depressed
`growth rates, but no fatalities were a11rib(cid:173)
`u1ed to ingestion of CAP. Dogs fed IO g of
`CAP daily showed no adverse affects after
`o ne year. 2
`•
`Storage of CA P-coated dicalcium phm,(cid:173)
`phatc tablets at room temperature for 12
`months caused no s ignificant change in dis(cid:173)
`integration times.'~ Blythe ct al. . however.
`reported that the type of disintcgrant incor(cid:173)
`porated into the tablet core affected the !lta(cid:173)
`bility of the dosage form. On the one hand.
`they found that CAP-coated aspirin tablets
`containing starc h as the dis intcgrant
`
`showed marked changes in both in vitro and
`in vivo disintegration times after 18 months
`in storage. On the other hand. no change in
`disintegration times was observed afte r
`storage of CAP-coated aspi rin tablet~ con(cid:173)
`taining guar gum as the disintcgrant. n
`
`Methods of Coating
`The oldest method of c ntcric coating in(cid:173)
`volves manual pan coating. Conventional
`coating pans are constructed of stainless
`steel and range in diameter from 12 in . tu 60
`in . Pans arc available in doughnut , pear,
`and hexagonal shapes. and most arc
`equipped with an exhaust syia c tn and a
`humidity-controlled air sourcc. 2 The angle
`o f the axis and the rotation speed may be ad(cid:173)
`justed as needed for a particular product.!>
`The conve ntional pan has a single front
`opening th rough which processing ai r en(cid:173)
`ters. Side-vented pans provide a unidirec(cid:173)
`tional flow of air through the bed and the
`pan's pe rforations . increasing coating
`c fficicncy.1
`M
`Coating solutions may be added to the pan
`by either inte rmittent or continuou~ pro(cid:173)
`ccssc.~. and new spray systems have largely
`replaced the conventional ladle technique for
`solution addition. A dusting powder such as
`talc or tnagncsium stcaratc may be added to
`the bed to prevent tablet ~ticking. The thick(cid:173)
`ness of the coat depend~ upon the nature of
`the coating lilm.1 the physical properties of
`the specific tablet," and the desired in vitro/
`in vivo release profile.
`The air suspension coater developed by
`Wurster i.uspends tablets in an ai rstrcam::-.
`the coating solution is sprayed onto the sus(cid:173)
`pended tablets and is then dried by warming
`the airstrcam . T he major disadvanwgc of
`this coater is breakage and attrition of the
`tablets . Tablets coated in this way must
`therefore have sufficient hardness to with(cid:173)
`stand collision with the walls of the coating
`chamber and with other tablets . i
`
`Evaluation of Enteric-Coated Tablets
`/11 vitro tests. The USP disi ntegration test
`for entcric-coated tablets first appeared in
`1955 in USP XV.'° It was modified in the
`second supplement to USP XV and has since
`remained unchanged . The test specifics that
`the tablets must remain intact in simulated
`gastric nuid TS at 37 °C for l hr. then disin(cid:173)
`tegrate in s imulated intestinal fluid T S at
`37 °C within a time period not 10 exceed the
`limit specified in the individual monograph
`for the uncoated tablet plus 2 hr. 11
`As early as 1948. investigators reported
`that the pH of simulated intestinal nuid
`should he slightly acidic to correspond to
`the pH of intestinal fluid in the duodenum. 14
`Nonetheless. the pH of simulated intc:.tinal
`fluid TS in USP XX ( 1980) is alkaline (pH
`7 .5). '2 A variety of alternati ve artificial in(cid:173)
`testinal fluids have been described in the lit-
`
`l o
`
`a
`
`• • •
`
`-
`
`craturc. the earliest by To pli:. in I 9 15. " The
`pH of these lluids have ranged from low
`values of 6 .8 .. and 6 .9 " tu a high of 8.5. 11
`Still. the only official simulated intc:.tinal
`fluid that is acidic (pH 6.8) i, found in the
`Brirish Pharmacopoeia.,..
`/\ large numbe r o f repo rts fou nd in the lit(cid:173)
`e rature demonstrate that good in vivo per(cid:173)
`formance by an cntcric-coatcd tablet is not
`ensured simpl y by virtueofpa:.~ing the USP
`di~intcgrat ion test. "' 40 Tablets that have
`passed the test have sometimes been oh(cid:173)
`:,ervcd to be excreted unchanged in the fc(cid:173)
`cc~ of normal human subject~."' Other tab(cid:173)
`le t:. have demonst ra ted poor relative
`hioavailability as compared to the uncoated
`tablets."' '~·''' Wagner and colleagues. u:.ing
`the USP disintegration apparatu, and a pH
`6 . 9 buffer. found no direct relationship be(cid:173)
`tween in vivo and in vitro disintegration
`times. '1
`" '·" ' Rasmussen. however. reported
`a direct proportionality between in vitro and
`in vivo disintegration time:.. independent of
`tablet size and composition."
`Virtually no attention has been given to
`the use of a dis:.olution tc:.t for e nteric(cid:173)
`coatcd tablets : indeed. the latci.t USP doc,
`not contain an official method of evaluating
`the dissolution behavior of cntcric-coatcd
`tablets . '1 In a study by Emhil and Torosian.
`the USP procedure for uncoated tablets wa,
`adapted to study the dissolution of cntcric(cid:173)
`coatcd aspirin rnblcts. The authors recom(cid:173)
`mended a pretreatment period of 15 min in
`:.imulated gastric fluid. followed by db:.o
`lution in simulated intc:.t inal lluid . The
`Mudy showed that longer pretreatment p.:n(cid:173)
`ods did not significantly alte r the dissolu(cid:173)
`tion profile."
`In a study performed recently by the au(cid:173)
`thor and co-worke rs. the di:.M>lution of dif(cid:173)
`fe re nt c ntc ric-coatcd formu latio ns wa:.
`studied at pl-I 1.2, pH 6 .0. and pH 8.0.4 '
`The following c riteria were c,tablishcd to
`help in the selection o f the bc,1 coating ma-
`
`n
`
`CII OII ~ H
`
`0
`I
`CII OCCII
`
`0
`
`c-<5
`6 COOH
`
`m,
`

`O C
`©rCOOft
`
`CHOCCH
`I
`0
`
`"
`
`Fig11re I : Chemical Mmcr11res of ce/f11/o.11•
`(A) and celfulo.ve acew re p/11/wlmc
`(CA P) (B).
`
`Page 4 of 18
`
`

`

`~ -.
`
`---
`- -.. - --_::::..:=:.~-
`-- ... -
`_,.
`
`-----
`
`..--.
`-------
`__ __ ... . -
`
`,,
`
`We'll custom re manufac ture yo ur
`o ld syste m on-site or at o ur plant
`in a fraction of the time it takes
`to buy a ne w o ne, plus save you
`up to 40% in the proces s.
`When it comes to sterilizers
`our philosophy is simple:
`'
`waste not, want not. We
`use pressure vessels and
`dc-:>rs from your old
`sterilizer and test them to
`ASME specifications. All
`o ther parts are factory(cid:173)
`new. We can also mod (cid:173)
`ernize your present system
`by adding custom features
`that better suit your needs.
`Our expert technicians
`keep your design simple
`for greater efficiency and
`
`'-"-
`..__,., -
`
`I
`
`-,-,.,,,..,..,.....,
`flexible and easy to program, Steritrol
`reliability. You get only the features
`you need, without costly gadgets that© is able to handle jobs at all levels of
`do little to improve processing. What's
`· sophistication, from production line
`more, our systems have proven so
`to R&D applications.
`For more information, call or write
`reliable we're able to offer you the
`Scientific Industries. We'll show you
`longest warranty in the
`how to put new !if e into your old
`industry- three full years,
`
`We'll update your
`s terilizer to meet GMP
`require m e nts and put
`it o n a real-time bas is.
`Our Steritrol microcom (cid:173)
`puter is a fail-safe system
`that eliminates operator/
`equipment error, allows
`complete and reliable
`documentation, plus pro(cid:173)
`vides you with many other
`~~~~~ht~s. Fully
`at the NLM and maybe
`Circle Rea~~j~~1~°t!ffiH·flc5, 75
`
`system. -~-~ ~--
`r The bleril lze r &p ecidli,t.
`
`Scientific Industries, Inc.
`70 Orvi ll e Drive. Airport lnterndti onal Plaza.
`Bohem ia,, NY 117 16
`(5 16) 567,4700
`See us at INTERPHEX , Booth #3420
`
`Page 5 of 18
`
`

`

`128
`terial and the ideal number of coats:
`• less than 10% of the drug should be re(cid:173)
`leased after 4 hr of dissolution testing at
`pH 1.2
`• the enteric coat should not alter dissolu(cid:173)
`tion of the tablet at pH 6.0; there should
`be no significant difference in percentage
`of drug remaining between the coated and
`uncoated tablets at selected sampling
`times
`• the enteric coat should not alter dissolu(cid:173)
`tion of the tablet at pH 8.0; there should
`be no significant difference in percentage
`of drug remaining between the coated and
`uncoated tablets at selected sampling
`times.
`Dissolution at pH 6.0 proved to provide the
`most information about a formulation. For(cid:173)
`mulations that performed well at pH 1.2 and
`pH 8.0 showed drastically different dissolu(cid:173)
`tion profiles at pH 6.0.
`In vivo tests. Losinski and Diver were the
`first to mention the importance of evaluati.ng
`the in vivo perfom1ance of an enteric-coated
`product. 45 ln 1933 they developed a fluoro(cid:173)
`scopic method of determining in vivo disin(cid:173)
`tegration time. Bukey and Bliven reported by
`1936 that the fluoroscopic method was inac(cid:173)
`curate :~ they introduced the radiographic
`technique, which has been used successfully
`9 The enteric
`by many investigators. 12
`11
`21
`•
`•
`·..,...
`material was usually applied to barium sul(cid:173)
`fate tablets; the progress of the tablet through
`the GI tract was followed by periodic X-ray
`
`analysis.
`Clinical evaluation has been used to de(cid:173)
`termine the in vivo performance of enteric(cid:173)
`coated tablets. Endoscopic examination of
`patients taking enteric-coated aspirin tab(cid:173)
`lets revealed that they suffe red significantly
`less gastric and duodenal mucosa damage
`than did patients taking plain o r buffered as(cid:173)
`pirin tablc ts . .so·52 Investigatio ns with this
`technique also revealed that po tass ium
`chloride released fro m enteric-coated tab(cid:173)
`lets caused lesions in the small bowel. sJ
`The most precise method of evaluating
`enteric-coatcd products is through direct
`detection of the drug in the body. Recent de(cid:173)
`velopments in drug analysis have greatly in(cid:173)
`creased the number of pharmacological
`agents that can be detected in biological llu(cid:173)
`ids. This method of evaluating in vivo per(cid:173)
`formance of coated drugs has been used by
`many investigators.s•-ss
`Physical methods of evaluating the in vi(cid:173)
`vo performance of coterie-coated tablets
`have also been introduced. Husa and Magid
`used a combination of calcium sulfide and
`methylene blue in the dosage form.59 Disin(cid:173)
`tegration of the tablet in the stomach caused
`regurgitation of hydrogen sulfide; disinte(cid:173)
`gration in the intestinal tract was revealed
`by the appearance of methylene blue in the
`urine. Peppem1int oil and carbonated water
`were used in another study ; eructation of
`peppermint indicated tablet di~intcgration
`in the stomach.60
`
`PHARMACEUTICAL TECHNOLOGY, September 1983
`Factors Affecting In Vivo Performance
`Properties of tlte film. Cohesion is the
`ability of a lilm monolayer to fom1 a strong
`bond that resists separation. To obtain a co(cid:173)
`hesive film. adjoining monomers must coa(cid:173)
`lesce on contact. forming a unifonn, non(cid:173)
`laminated matrix . Strong cohesive forces.
`however. can impart both desirable and un(cid:173)
`desirable properties in an enteric film. Al(cid:173)
`though a strongly cohesive film becomes
`more compact a nd less pcm1eable to mois(cid:173)
`ture. strong cohesion leads to film brittle(cid:173)
`ness and innexibility.
`The struc ture and geometric shape of
`polymeric molecules affect the stre ngth of
`the film . Branched macromolecules with
`regular, unhindered shapes form the most
`cohesive films. Cellulose acetate phthalate,
`for e xample. forms a strong, cohesive film
`because of its rigid ring structure and the
`large number of functional groups able to
`form hydrogen bonds. The film 's strength is
`also affected by the solvent system used
`during application. Solvation occurs when
`the solve nt-polymer combinations are
`formed. Adhesive forces must exceed the
`cohesive solve nt-solvent a nd polymer(cid:173)
`polymer forces. In gene ral. the greater the
`degree of solvation, the stronger the result(cid:173)
`ing film.
`As the solvent evaporates. a polymeric
`gel forms . The orientation of molecules in
`the gel - and he nce in the final dry film -
`is a functio n of the solvent-polymer Orienta-
`
`Granulation Dryers
`THAT PASS THE TEST
`
`Sterilizers
`THAT PASS THE TEST
`
`FREE
`BROCHURE
`
`FREE
`BROCHURE
`
`Designed, built. a nd tested to meet
`your require m ents. The latest in single(cid:173)
`pass dryers, partial recirculation dry(cid:173)
`ers, and explosion-resistant dryers.
`Custom engineering for any s hape o r
`s ize. Fully-w elded structural steel
`fram es. Steam, gas, o r electrically
`heated. Free in forma tio n kit.
`
`The latest CG MP designs ensure validation with ± 5°C uni(cid:173)
`formity a nd factory tuned a nd tested air flow to ±20 FMP.
`175° sterilizatio n and 250° depyrogenation in shdf a nd truck(cid:173)
`loading units. Custom e ngineering for any sh ape or size.
`Fully-welded structural steel fram ework. Compkte informa(cid:173)
`tion packet available.
`
`t) GRUENBERG OVEN COMPANY
`~
`GRUENBERG OVEN QQMPAN'(
`was opie G~ruenberg
`P.0 : Box3246,2121 ~cfPA&iaI
`P.O. Box3246,2121 Reach Road
`- - - - - - - - -~ Williamsport, PA 17701
`WIiiiamsport, PA 177<:)!t the NLM and ma be
`717-326-1755
`717-326·1755
`Subj ect USCopyrig t Laws
`-A Lunalra Company
`
`See us at INTERPHEX - Booth 1206
`
`Page 6 of 18
`
`

`

`SUSTAINED RELEASE
`
`dissolution
`
`I
`
`saf,
`
`studies
`
`11 ..
`r il T !'
`116:c: e -. • • t e a
`\I
`•
`\I,
`.
`I
`•
`, ~ \
`•
`~ I, •
`I
`
`~
`
`• ,
`
`I
`
`VERSATILE FEATURES IN MODULAR FORM
`
`• HANSON FULLY EQUIPPED TEST STATION
`• MICRO-PROCESSOR CONTROLLED AUTOMATION
`• VARIABLE SAMPLE TIMES (5 min, - 24 hr.)
`• AUTO-PROBE ELIMINATES PROBE DISTURBANCE IN FLASK
`• AUTOMATED ABSORBANCE DETECTION AND PRINT-OUT
`• PH CHANGE (up to 250 ml) ON PROGRAMMED COMMAND
`• MED IA REPLACEMENT TO MAINTAIN FLASK VOLUME
`• DILUTION AND REAGENT ADDITION CAPABILITY
`• CONVENIENT HPLC ("WI SP"®) INTERFACE
`
`~
`HANSON
`
`RESEARCH CORPORATION
`teadeAI.> ~n fu~olu;t.,<.on teehnotogy
`19727 Bahama St, J NorthridgeJ CA 91324 USA
`213/882-7266
`* VISTRI BUTORS WORLV-WIV E *
`This material was copied
`ClrclaiReCilfllaf £EiJ1f!~.Card No. 78
`Subject US Copyright Laws
`
`tlx:182-344
`
`Page 7 of 18
`
`

`

`PHARMACEUTICAL TECHNOLOGY. September 1983
`siveness is reduced, with a resultant increase
`R ·mussen ob·
`Thickness of the coat. as
`h
`in flexibility and toughness.
`h' between t e
`.
`served a direct relations 1P
`h
`The plasticizer must be miscible with the
`thickness o f the CAP coat on tablets and I de
`polymer and usually is related closely in
`the blood an
`. .
`.
`appearance of qummc in
`. w
`structure to the polymer. 8 The type of plasti(cid:173)
`l'miting
`urrnc.
`cizer used will affect the moisture-vapor
`Gastric emptyi11g rale. The rate- 1
`d
`transmission rate through the film and theo(cid:173)
`ntcric-coate
`.
`f
`.
`step in the absorption o an c
`.
`retically will affect the in vivo disintegra(cid:173)
`pty rng ume.
`.
`drug product is the gastric em
`d
`tion time. Luce, however, reported that
`rescntc to
`b
`Once the dosage form has cen P ·
`d . b-
`plasticizers have little effect on in vitro dis(cid:173)
`thc intestinal tract. disintegration an .;ly
`integration times. 15 The most common plas(cid:173)
`sorption of the drug should occur ~api

`ticizers used in the pharmaceutical industry
`. c residence
`Any factor that affects the gastn
`d·-
`arc phthalatc e~tcrs. glycerin. castor oil .
`·11 therefore 1
`d-
`time of the dosage form wi
`propylene glycol . and low molecular
`f the pro
`rcctly affect the performance O
`• that
`weight polyethylene glycols.2
`1 · d , veraJ factors
`'
`uct. • Maycrsohn 1ste se
`.•
`.
`. humans, in
`influence gastric emptying in
`the
`I
`d pe of mea'
`.
`eluding the volume an
`ty
`·ous
`ntcnts van

`physical state of gastric co
`'
`sition,
`
`130
`tion. It is usually desirable to have a rapid
`rate o f solvent evaporation in order to re(cid:173)
`duce the required coating time. 8 Rapid
`evapora'tion, however, promotes the forma(cid:173)
`tion of a rough, " orange peel" coat. 2 The
`permeability of the film also may be affect-
`.
`8
`ed by the rate of evaporatton .
`A plasticizer may be added to a polymeric
`film to reduce brinleness, increase flexibili(cid:173)
`ty, and i mprove flowability. Plasticizers are
`low-volatile liquids that change the physical
`and mechanical propenies of the polymer. 2
`One theory holds lhat a plasticizer interferes
`with the polymer-polymer anachments, thus
`reducing molecular rigidity. The film's cohc-
`
`I Introducing a
`'
`faster, safer way
`of screening
`ingredients
`
`'mCUUlol
`IINf
`
`/
`
`MATERIAL []
`
`This new check sieving package, combining the Russell Siv
`and a Vac-U-Max va_c~um transfer system, is a major break(cid:173)
`through to more eff1c1ent, safer processing. The completely
`closed system enables you to automatical ly transfer material
`to your process and check sieve in the same operation. No
`dust, no loss, no hazard, no contamination. Vacuum in(cid:173)
`creases throughput many fold, yet eliminates manual opera(cid:173)
`tion, and greatly reduces housekeeping. For further details or
`to arrange for demonstration at the Vac-U-Max test lab using
`your own material, call or write Vac -U -Max, 37 Rutgers St
`iBelleville, N.J. 07109. (201) 759-4400.
`·•
`
`drugs. several disease states. body r
`
`the
`.
`and the extent o f physical exerci_se.
`· · either in
`bl
`or
`An enteric-coated ta ct is
`.
`. 1 fi absorptron'
`stomach and not ava1lab e or
`raphic
`.
`. 1 tra· ct Rad1og
`.
`.
`.
`I
`.
`11 1s in t 1e rntestrna

`h
`f time
`studies have determined the len~t 0
`the
`.
`· etained 1n
`an enteric-coated tablet is r
`b BukeY
`40 An extensive SIUdy Y
`4
`47
`f
`stomach. 2
`•
`•
`d shape o
`.
`and Brew found that the size an .
`time
`.
`rr
`emptying
`'
`the tablet did not a cct
`.
`tiga-
`9 h •• O1her inves
`which averaged 5.
`r.
`ptying
`.
`tors reported that the average em
`. ob·
`d olleagucs
`time was 4 hr: 8 Blythe an c
`hr 25
`7
`I 5 hr to over

`served a range from
`key's

`8
`trary to u
`Wagner reported that, con
`h
`tablet
`and Brew's findings, the size of I creovcr.
`· e· mo
`affected the residence t1m ·
`.
`time
`. mpty rng
`Wagner observed that e
`1
`tying
`obeyed the laws of probability.
`•
`.
`. .
`r astnc emP
`The unprcd 1ctabrlrty o. g •
`.. dvaniage
`time is often seen as a unrque disa
`drugs
`o f enteric-coated tablets; howevc~, omach
`b d r om the st
`1
`r
`.
`that arc poorl y absor e
`factor.
`arc also greatly affected by thf,~ e, water
`lass O IC
`ed tab-
`Ritschel suggested that a g '· ·
`tcric-coat
`••
`. h
`should be taken wrt an en
`.
`tying.
`let to ensure rapid stomach emP
`ap·
`d' ffercnt
`I
`Wagner recommended a
`tirnum
`thc
`proach, observing
`that
`~those
`emcric-coated dosage forms wou
`·,nules
`f atcd gr,
`in which a large number o co
`,
`1
`. d . a capsu c.
`.
`or prlules were comarnc 1n
`
`1;
`
`d •rablelS
`•
`Reliability of Enten c-Coate
`fin
`Ports o
`, d 1ed
`Cooper stated that frequent re
`ed tablets ha
`.
`.
`.
`... ·rn bY
`vivo failures of entcnc-coat
`.
`crruc1s
`. . g of
`to suspicion among and acuve
`escrrb1n
`clinicians faced with the pr
`i·ierature
`,6l The 1
`.
`.
`cnterrc-coated dosage forms.
`-
`g thC
`11
`d onstrat1
`,,,
`contains many accounts cm
`.1<>.J9.S11·•'
`unreliability of the dosage for~,; on thC
`very little however, has been written of (he
`.
`'
`.
`Most
`and
`subJcct in the recent literature.
`970
`d before 1
`'
`negative reports appcarc
`h t arc not
`several of those concerned dru~s t arorms in
`available in enteric-coated dosage
`the United States.
`nations
`1
`There are several possible exp a
`
`Page 8 of 18
`
`

`

`CAPSULE MA NUFACTURING
`
`ENCAPSULATING
`
`R&O LABORATORIES
`
`STORAGE & PACKAGING OF
`HYGROSCOPIC M ATERIAL
`
`HEAT-SENSITIVE
`PRODUCT DRYING
`
`AMPULE FILLING
`
`TABLET COATING
`
`POWDER FILLING
`
`COMPOUNDING
`
`DOESYOUR
`fHARMACEUTICAL PLANT
`4VE HUMIDITY PROBLEMS?
`
`quali ty systems guarantees years of low
`mainte11cmce and the support or a 24-hour
`service Hot Line.
`To learn how a Cargocaire Industrial
`Dehumidification System can eliminate
`your humidity control problems call Boris
`Elisayeff, Market Manager, (617) 388-0600
`or attach your business card to this ad and
`mail it to Cargocaire today.
`
`ma~~rn humidity causes pharmaceuticaJ
`more ac~urers quality control problems (cid:173)
`for so~~i more they look to Cargocaire
`Th
`ons.
`for d~ ~·s b~cause our systems are known
`manuf ivenng conditioned air that meets
`Wheth acturers' specifications consistently.
`dew p ~r you require delivered air wit/1
`minus om!5 of 1- 40°F or dew points of
`5~ F or anywhere in between, a
`Car
`O
`appfi/at!re system can meet your critical
`S a 10 11 needs.
`Plai rem~ve humidity as a variable in your
`rate
`7nvironment and improve the drying
`0
`Proble heat~sensitive materials, eliminate
`
`ing, po mJ wi~h _compounding, encapsulat-
`
`And w er f1llmg or tablet coating.
`Cargo/~ the leader in dehumidification,
`cant l aire can show you how dry desic(cid:173)
`signifi~chnology can save your company a
`
`dificati ur sa_r e, dry, non-corrosive dehum1-
`
`costs. 0nt ~ercentage of its pr~sent energy
`Pharrn °~ ll~lls offer capaci ties to meet any
`Produc~ce~tical processor's need with units
`Produc;ng fO to 40,000 SCFM, and systems
`steam ng 50 to 15,000 SCFM. You choose
`the de~?as or electric power supply. And
`ign leadership of our industrial
`
`~
`Gocl\lflEEN
`GiNEEAiNGc
`OFlPORATtON • Ot:PT 310 W. p O BOX 640 . AMESBURY. M ASS 01913 • TEL 6 17-388-0600 • TELEX 94-7496 • CABLE CARGOCAIRE
`
`Clrcle Reo~r c:..rvtce Card. No. 80
`s ~re riarw,ucop,ed
`at the NLM and
`
`Page 9 of 18
`
`

`

`132
`,
`the recent decline of reported in vivo
`,m
`b
`.
`failures involving enteric-coated ta lets m
`the United States. The most obvious reason
`is that the number of products available in
`this dosage form has declined. In 1930 an
`estimated 3.3 % of all prescriptions were
`written for enteric-coated drug products.611
`Statistics are not available concerning the
`use of this dosage form today; nevertheless,
`the percentage is certainly much lower. Ta(cid:173)
`ble D contains a list of the diminishing num(cid:173)
`ber of drugs available in enteric-coatcd tab(cid:173)
`lets in the United States in 1981. 69
`The early reports of in vivo failures had the
`benefit ofleading to the elimination of many
`
`i,er1983
`ed 10
`PHARMACEUTICAL TECHNOLOGY, Septe~
`ot
`unacceptable entcric coating materials. Re-
`11! recently. tablet coaling was
`. consider
`.
`.
`.
`. les weren
`be an art, and scientific pnncip
`ues con·
`formu lation of an enteric-coated aspirin tab-
`50s
`let, for instance, occurred in the 1960s after
`rigidly applied. Wagner and colleag
`f
`f
`19
`requent reports o · poor in vivo perfor-
`
`
`
`. n the late f large d. ducted a series o stu ,es I
`.
`f
`38
`58
`designed to determine the causes O rciallY
`Most of the enterie-coated tab-
`mance.
`~"
`I
`• ·n comrne
`.
`. •
`ets introduced to the market in the past few
`, TheY dis-
`batch-to-batch vana11ons 1
`years have been co

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket