`
`Filed: January 9, 2018
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`____________________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`____________________
`
`KVK-Tech, Inc.
`Petitioner
`
`v.
`
`Shire PLC
`Patent Owner
`
`____________________
`
`Case IPR2017-00290
`U.S. Patent No. 8,846,100
`
`____________________
`
`PETITIONER’S MOTION FOR ADMISSION PRO HAC VICE OF
`CHAD LANDMON
`
`
`
`
`
`I.
`
`Statement of Precise Relief Requested
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.l0(c), Petitioner KVK-Tech, Inc. requests that the
`
`Patent Trial and Appeal Board (the “Board”) admit Chad Landmon pro hac vice in
`
`this proceeding, IPR2017-00290.
`
`II.
`
`Statement of Facts Showing Good Cause for the Board to Recognize
`Counsel Pro Hac Vice During this Proceeding
`
`In accordance with 37 C.F.R. § 42.l0(c), the Board may recognize counsel
`
`pro hac vice during a proceeding upon a showing of good cause, subject to the
`
`condition that lead counsel be a registered practitioner and to any other conditions
`
`the Board may impose. Section 42.10(c) indicates that, “where lead counsel is a
`
`registered practitioner, a motion to appear pro hac vice by counsel who is not a
`
`registered practitioner may be granted upon a showing that counsel is an
`
`experienced litigating attorney and has an established familiarity with the subject
`
`matter at issue in the proceeding.” The facts here establish good cause for the Board
`
`to recognize Mr. Landmon pro hac vice in this proceeding.
`
`1. Lead counsel, Jonathan A. Harris, is a registered practitioner. Back-up counsel,
`
`James T. Evans is also a registered practitioner.
`
`2. Mr. Landmon is an experienced litigator who has an established familiarity
`
`with the subject matter at issue in the proceeding. Accompanying this motion as
`
`Exhibit 1041 is the Declaration of Chad Landmon in Support of Motion for
`
`
`
`
`
`Admission Pro Hac Vice (“Landmon Decl.”). In his declaration, Mr. Landmon
`
`asserts:
`
`I am a member in good standing in the Bars of Connecticut and the
`District of Columbia and am admitted to practice before the U.S. District
`Courts for the District of Columbia, District of Connecticut, Eastern
`District of Michigan and Southern District of New York. I am also
`admitted to practice before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of
`Columbia Court, the Federal Circuit, the Fourth Circuit, and the Sixth
`Circuit.
`
`Landmon Decl. ¶ 3 (Ex. 41). Mr. Landmon also states that he has a prior relationship
`
`with Petitioner. Id. ¶ 10. Mr. Landmon also demonstrates that he has a detailed
`
`working knowledge of the relevant subject matter through his participation in prior
`
`proceedings involving amphetamine salts and Adderall® formulations as a result of
`
`participation as counsel in prior amphetamine salt-related patent cases. Id. ¶ 11.
`
`3. In his declaration, Mr. Landmon also attests to each of the listed items required
`
`by the Order – Authorizing Motion for Pro Hac Vice Admission – 37 C.F.R. § 42.10
`
`in IPR2013-00639. See Landmon Decl. ¶¶ 1-11 (Ex. 41). Mr. Landmon attests that
`
`he has read and will comply with the Office Patent Trial Practice Guide and the
`
`Board's Rules of Practice for Trials set forth in 35 C.F.R. § 42. Id. ¶ 7. Mr. Landmon
`
`further attests that he agrees to be subject to the United States Patent and Trademark
`
`Office's Rules of Professional Conduct as set forth in 37 C.F.R. §§ 11.101 et seq. and
`
`disciplinary jurisdiction under 37 C.F.R. § 1 l.19(a). Id. ¶ 8.
`
`
`
`III. Conclusion
`
`For the foregoing reasons, Petitioner respectfully requests that the Board
`
`admit Mr. Landmon pro hac vice in this proceeding.
`
`Date: January 9, 2018
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`By: /s/ Jonathan A. Harris
` Jonathan A. Harris
` James T. Evans\
` Axinn, Veltrop & Harkrider LLP
` Counsel for Petitioner,
` KVK-Tech, Inc.
`
`
`
`Case No. IPR2018-00290
`Petitioner’s Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Chad Landmon
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. §§ 42.6(e)(4) and 42.105, the undersigned certifies
`
`that a true and correct copy ot this document (Petitioner's Motion for
`
`Admission Pro Hac Vice of Chad Landmon), and every Exhibit filed with
`
`this document, were served electronically via email on January 9, 2018, in its
`
`entirety on the following:
`
`Joseph R. Robinson
`Troutman Sanders LLP
`875 Third Avenue
`New York, NY 10022
`joseph.robinson@troutmansanders.com
`
`Dustin B. Weeks
`Troutman Sanders LLP
`Bank of America Plaza
`600 Peachtree Street NE, Suite 5200
`Atlanta, GA 30308-2231
`dustin.weeks@troutmansanders.com
`
`Robert Schaffer
`Troutman Sanders LLP
`875 Third Avenue
`New York, NY 10022
`robert.schaffer@troutmansanders.com
`
`Patent Owner has consented to electronic service.
`
`/s/ James T. Evans
` James T. Evans
` Reg. No. 64,377
`
`
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
