`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`KVK-Tech, Inc.
`Petitioner
`
`V.
`
`Shire PLC
`
`Patent Owner
`
`Case IPR2017-00290
`
`U.S. Patent No. 8,846,100
`
`DECLARATION OF CHAD LANDMON IN SUPPORT OF MOTION
`
`FOR ADMISSION PRO HAC VICE
`
`KVK-TECH EXHIBIT 1041
`
`KVK-TECH EXHIBIT 1041
`
`
`
`1, Chad Landmon, declare as follows:
`
`1.
`
`I was admitted to the Connecticut Bar in 1999 and the District of
`
`Columbia Bar in 2009.
`
`I have been practicing law for over 18 years. For more
`
`than 16 years, my practice has focused primarily on patent litigation.
`
`2.
`
`Over the course of my career, I have been counsel in over 40 patent
`
`litigations.
`
`3.
`
`I am a member of good standing in the Bars of Connecticut and the
`
`District of Columbia and am admitted to practice before the US. District Courts
`
`for the District of Columbia, District of Connecticut, Eastern District of Michigan
`
`and Southern District of New York. I am also admitted to practice before the US.
`
`Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Court, the Federal Circuit, the
`
`Fourth Circuit, and the Sixth Circuit.
`
`4.
`
`My Connecticut Bar membership number is 417340. My District of
`
`Columbia Bar membership is 990347.
`
`5.
`
`I have never been suspended or disbarred from practice before any
`
`court or administrative body.
`
`6.
`
`I have never had a court or administrative body deny my application
`
`for admission to practice.
`
`
`
`7.
`
`I have read and will comply with the Patent Office Trial Practice
`
`Guide and the Board’s Rules for Practice for Trials, as set forth in 37 C.F.R. Part
`
`42.
`
`8.
`
`I agree to be subject to the United States Patent and Trademark Office
`
`Rules of Professional Conduct set forth in 37 C.F.R. §§ 11.101 et seq. and
`
`disciplinary jurisdiction under 37 CPR. § 1 l.l9(a).
`
`9.
`
`I have currently applied to appear pro hac vice in the following related
`
`proceeding before the United States Patent and Trademark Office IPR2017-00293.
`
`I have not applied to appear pro hac vice before the United States Patent and
`
`Trademark Office in any other proceedings in the last three years.
`
`10.
`
`In addition to this matter, I have represented KVK-Tech, Inc. or its
`
`affiliates in multiple patent and patent-related cases, including Purdue Pharma
`
`L.P. et al. V. KVK-Tech Inc. et al., 16—CV-00025 (D. Del.) and Purdue Pharma
`
`
`L.P. et 211. V. KVK-Tech Inc. et a1., l7-cv-00450 (D. 1361.).
`
`l 1.
`
`I am intimately familiar with the subject matter of US. Patent No.
`
`8,846,100. I am also intimately familiar with amphetamine salt formulations, such
`
`as Adderall XR® as a result of my participation as counsel in litigation related to
`
`Adderall XR®, specifically, Shire LLC et al. V. Abhai LLC, l:15-cv~l3909 (D.
`
`Mass). In addition, I have represented a number of life sciences and
`
`
`
`pharmaceutical companies in patent litigation matters before federal district
`
`courts and appellate courts. The technology in these disputes includes
`
`pharmaceutical compounds, including those for the treatment of attention deficit
`
`hyperactivity disorder, and method-of-treatment claims.
`
`12.
`
`I hereby declare that all statements made herein of my own
`
`knowledge are true and that all statements made on information and belief are
`
`believed to be true; and further that these statements and the like are punishable by
`
`fine, imprisonment, or both under Section 1001 of Title 18 of the United States
`
`Code.
`
`Date: January 8,2018
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`W % M
`
`Chad A. Landmon
`
`Axinn, Veltrop & Harkrider LLP
`90 State House Square
`Hartford, CT 06103
`(860) 275-8100
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
