throbber
Paper 23
`Entered: February 6, 2019
`
`Trials@uspto.gov
`571-272-7822
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`APPLE, INC.,
`Petitioner,
`v.
`UNILOC 2017 LLC,
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`
`Case IPR2018-00282
`Patent 7,092,671 B2
`____________
`
`Before MIRIAM L. QUINN and GARTH D. BAER Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`BAER, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`
`
`ORDER
`Requests for Oral Argument
`37 C.F.R. § 42.70
`
`
`
`

`

`
`
`IPR2018-00282
`Patent 7,092,671 B2
`The Scheduling Order for this proceeding provided that an oral hearing
`would be conducted on February 28, 2019, if requested by either party and granted
`by the Board. Paper 8, 7. The parties requested oral hearing pursuant to 37 C.F.R.
`§ 42.70. Papers 21, 22. In addition to its general request for a hearing, Petitioner
`Apple, Inc. requested that the oral hearing be held at the Silicon Valley USPTO in
`San Jose, CA. Paper 22, 2. Patent Owner Uniloc 2017 LLC requested that hearing
`be held at the Texas Regional Office in Dallas, TX, and requested that the parties
`be given twenty (20) minutes per side. Paper 21, 1.
`The Parties’ request for oral hearing is granted. The Board apologizes for
`the inconvenience to the parties, if any, but at this time, it is unable to
`accommodate the parties’ conflicting requests to conduct the hearing at one of our
`regional offices. The hearing will commence at 1:00 PM on February 28, 2019,
`on the ninth floor of Madison Building East, 600 Dulany Street, Alexandria,
`Virginia.
`The Board will provide a court reporter for the hearing and the reporter’s
`transcript will constitute the official record of the hearing. The hearing will be
`open to the public for in-person attendance that will be accommodated on a first-
`come, first-served basis. If the parties have any concern about disclosing
`confidential information, they are to contact the Board at least 10 days in advance
`of the hearing to discuss the matter.
`Each party will have thirty (30) minutes of total oral argument time.
`Petitioner bears the ultimate burden of proof that Patent Owner’s claims at issue in
`these proceedings are unpatentable. Therefore, Petitioner will open the hearing by
`presenting its case regarding the challenged claims for which the Board instituted
`trial. After Petitioner’s presentation, Patent Owner will respond to Petitioner’s
`argument. Petitioner may reserve rebuttal time to respond to arguments presented
`
`2
`
`
`

`

`
`
`IPR2018-00282
`Patent 7,092,671 B2
`by Patent Owner. The parties may also address any pending motions during their
`respective presentations.
`Under 37 C.F.R. § 42.70(b), demonstrative exhibits must be served at least
`seven business days prior to the hearing. The parties shall confer with each other
`regarding any objections to demonstrative exhibits, and file demonstrative exhibits
`with the Board, as a separate exhibit in accordance with 37 C.F.R. § 42.63, at least
`five business days prior to the hearing. Demonstrative exhibits are not evidence,
`but merely a visual aid at the oral hearing. The Board expects the parties will meet
`and confer in good faith to resolve any objections to demonstrative exhibits. For
`any issue that cannot be resolved after conferring with the opposing party, the
`parties may email jointly to Trials@uspto.gov a one-page list of objections at least
`five business days prior to the hearing. The list should identify with particularity
`which demonstrative exhibits are subject to objection and include a short statement
`(no more than one short sentence) of the reason for each objection. No argument
`or further explanation is permitted. We will consider the objections and schedule a
`conference call, if necessary. Otherwise, we will reserve ruling on the objections
`until the hearing or after the hearing. Any objection to demonstrative exhibits that
`is not presented timely will be considered waived. Each party also shall provide a
`hard copy of its demonstrative exhibits to the court reporter at the hearing.
`The parties should note that at least one member of the panel will be
`attending the hearing electronically from a remote location, and that if a
`demonstrative is not filed or otherwise made fully available or visible to the judge
`presiding over the hearing remotely, that demonstrative will not be considered.
`Any counsel of record may present a party’s argument. If either party
`expects that its lead counsel will not be attending the oral argument, it should
`notify the Board no later than two business days prior to the oral hearing.
`
`3
`
`
`

`

`
`
`IPR2018-00282
`Patent 7,092,671 B2
`Any special requests for audiovisual equipment should be directed to
`Trials@uspto.gov. Requests for special equipment will not be honored unless
`presented in a separate communication not less than seven business days before the
`hearing, directed to the above email address.
`
`
`PETITIONER:
`Andrew S. Ehmke
`Philip W. Woo
`HAYNES AND BOONE, LLP
`andy.ehmke.ipr@haynesboone.com
`philip.woo.ipr@haynesboone.com
`
`PATENT OWNER:
`Ryan Loveless
`Brett Mangrum
`James Etheridge
`Jeffrey Huang
`ETHERIDGE LAW GROUP
`ryan@etheridgelaw.com
`brett@etheridgelaw.com
`jim@etheridgelaw.com
`jeff@etheridgelaw.com
`
`Sean D. Burdick
`UNILOC USA, INC.
`sean.burdick@unilocusa.com
`
`
`4
`
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket