throbber
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`___________________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`___________________
`
`ZTE (USA) Inc., SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., SAMSUNG
`ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC.,
`Petitioners,
`
`v.
`
`FUNDAMENTAL INNOVATION SYSTEMS INTERNATIONAL LLC,
`Patent Owner.
`___________________
`
`Case IPR2018-00274
`Patent No. 7,834,586
`___________________
`
`JOINT MOTION TO DISMISS SAMSUNG FROM THE
`PROCEEDING PURSUANT 35 U.S.C. § 317(a) AND 37 C.F.R. § 42.5(a)
`
`Mail Stop “PATENT BOARD”
`Patent Trial and Appeal Board
`U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
`P.O. Box 1450
`Alexandria, VA 22313-1450
`
`10541414
`
`

`

`Case IPR2018-00274
`Patent No. 7,834,586
`
`I.
`
`Statement of Relief Requested
`
`Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 317(a) and 37 C.F.R. § 42.5(a), and the Board’s
`
`authorization via email on July 13, 2018, Petitioner Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
`
`and Samsung Electronics America, Inc. (collectively, “Samsung”), and Patent
`
`Owner, Fundamental Innovation Systems International LLC, jointly move that the
`
`Board dismiss Samsung from the above-captioned proceeding as a result of a
`
`settlement between Samsung and Patent Owner.
`
`The parties are filing concurrently herewith a request that the settlement
`
`agreement between the parties, submitted as Exhibit 2015, be treated as business
`
`confidential information and be kept separate from the file of the involved patent,
`
`pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.74(c).
`
`The settlement agreement is being filed as "Only to Board" so that ZTE
`
`would not have access to it.
`
`II.
`
`Statement of Facts
`
`In February of 2017, Patent Owner brought a suit against Samsung in the
`
`United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas (Civ. No. 2:17-cv-
`
`00145-JRG-RSP), asserting infringement of one or more claims of U.S. 7,834,586
`
`(the “’586 Patent”). The '586 Patent is also the subject of civil action numbers
`
`2:16-cv-01424-JRG-RSP (against LG Electronics, Inc. et al.) and 2:16-cv-01425-
`
`JRG-RSP (against Huawei) pending in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern
`
`10541414
`
`- 1 -
`
`

`

`Case IPR2018-00274
`Patent No. 7,834,586
`
`District of Texas, and Civil Action No. 3:17-cv-01827-N (against ZTE Corporation
`
`et al.) pending in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas.
`
`Samsung and ZTE (USA) Inc. (“ZTE”) sought inter partes review of the
`
`’586 Patent in this proceeding. Patent Owner filed its preliminary responses on
`
`June 8, 2018. The Board's institution decision is not due until September 8, 2018.
`
`On July 6, 2018, Samsung and Patent Owner entered into a settlement
`
`agreement. See Ex. 2015 (Confidential). Pursuant to the terms of the settlement
`
`agreement, the parties agree, among other things, for Samsung to withdraw with
`
`prejudice from the above-captioned IPR proceeding.
`
`III. Argument
`
`A.
`
`Legal Standard
`
`35 U.S.C. § 317(a) provides that “[a]n inter partes review instituted under
`
`this chapter shall be terminated with respect to any petitioner upon the joint request
`
`of the petitioner and the patent owner, unless the Office has decided the merits of
`
`the proceeding before the request for termination is filed.”
`
`Moreover, "[t]he Board may determine a proper course of conduct in a
`
`proceeding for any situation not specifically covered by this part and may enter
`
`non-final orders to administer the proceeding." 37 C.F.R. § 42.5(a). The Board
`
`may also "take up petitions or motions for decisions in any order, may grant, deny,
`
`or dismiss any petition or motion, and may enter any appropriate order." 37 C.F.R.
`
`10541414
`
`- 2 -
`
`

`

`Case IPR2018-00274
`Patent No. 7,834,586
`
`§ 42.71(a). Hence, in the past, the Board has dismissed a pre-institution proceeding
`
`or allowed a party to withdraw from a pre-institution proceeding under 37 C.F.R.
`
`§§ 42.5(a) and 42.71(a). Cf. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. v. Nvidia Corp.,
`
`IPR2015-01270, Paper 11 (PTAB Dec. 9, 2015) (dismissing Samsung's petition
`
`pre-institution under 37 C.FR. §§ 42.5(a) and 42.71(a)); Borgwarner Emissions
`
`Systems, LLC v. Modine Manufacturing Co., IPR2018-00407, Paper 11 (PTAB,
`
`July 5, 2018) (dismissing petition pre-institution under 37 C.FR. §§ 42.5(a) and
`
`42.71(a).
`
`B.
`
`The Board Should Exercise Its Discretion and Dismiss Samsung
`from the Above-Captioned Proceeding
`
`As noted in the Statement of Facts, Samsung and Patent Owner have settled
`
`their dispute. The Board has also yet to issue a decision on institution. Dismissing
`
`Samsung from the proceedings would effect the agreement between the Patent
`
`Owner and Samsung.
`
`Dismissing Samsung from the proceedings would not prejudice ZTE
`
`because ZTE can continue litigating the merits of the case before the Board.
`
`C.
`
`Status of Related Matters
`
`The parties are filing herewith as Exhibit 2015 a true copy of settlement
`
`agreement entered between the parties on July 6, 2018. The settlement agreement
`
`was entered into in contemplation of dismissing Samsung from this proceeding and
`
`10541414
`
`- 3 -
`
`

`

`Case IPR2018-00274
`Patent No. 7,834,586
`
`Fundamental Innovation Systems International LLC v. Samsung Electronics Co.,
`
`Ltd. et al., E.D. Tex., No. 2:17-cv-00145-JRG-RSP. This settlement agreement is
`
`the only agreement or understanding between Samsung and Patent Owner made in
`
`connection with, or in contemplation of dismissing Samsung. 37 C.F.R. §
`
`42.74(b).
`
`IV. Conclusion
`
`Samsung and Patent Owner respectfully request that the Board grant the
`
`parties’ Joint Motion to dismiss Samsung from the proceeding. The parties also
`
`request that the Board grant Samsung and Patent Owner’s joint request to treat the
`
`settlement agreement between the parties as business confidential information and
`
`keep it separate from the file of the ’586 Patent.
`
`10541414
`
`- 4 -
`
`

`

`Dated: July 13, 2018
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`/s/ Greg Arovas
`
`/s/ Hong Zhong
`
`Case IPR2018-00274
`Patent No. 7,834,586
`
`Michael R. Fleming (Reg. No. 67,933)
`H. Annita Zhong (Reg. No. 66,530)
`Irell & Manella LLP
`1800 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 900
`Los Angeles, CA 90067
`Tel: (310) 277-1010
`Fax: (310) 203-7199
`Email: MFleming@irell.com
`Email: HZhong@irell.com
`
`Gregory S. Arovas (Reg. 38,818)
`greg.arovas@kirkland.com
`Robert A. Appleby (Reg. 40,897)
`robert.appleby@kirkland.com
`Todd M. Friedman (Reg. 42,559)
`todd.friedman@kirkland.com
`Alan Rabinowitz (Reg. 66,217)
`arabinowitz@kirkland.com
`KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP
`601 Lexington Avenue
`New York, NY 10028
`T: 212-446-4800
`F: 212-446-6460
`
`Eugene Goryunov (Reg. 61,579)
`eugene.goryunov@kirkland.com
`KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP
`300 North LaSalle Street
`Chicago, IL 60654
`T: 312-862-2000
`F: 312-862-2200
`
`10541414
`
`- 5 -
`
`

`

`Case IPR2018-00274
`Patent No. 7,834,586
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`I hereby certify, pursuant to 37 C.F.R. section 42.6, that on July 13, 2018, a
`
`complete copy of the foregoing document, Joint Request to File Agreement as
`
`Business Confidential Information and Keep it Separate from File of US Patent
`
`No. 7,834, 586 under 37 C.F.R. § 42.74, and Exhibit 2015 were served upon the
`
`following, by ELECTRONIC MAIL:
`
`KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP
`Gregory S. Arovas
`greg.arovas@kirkland.com
`Robert A. Appleby
`robert.appleby@kirkland.com
`Todd M. Friedman
`todd.friedman@kirkland.com
`Alan Rabinowitz
`alan.rabinowitz@kirkland.com
`Eugene Goryunov
`eugene.goryunov@kirkland.com
`
`I further certify, pursuant to 37 C.F.R. section 42.6, that on July 13, 2018, a
`
`complete copy of the foregoing document and Joint Request to File Agreement as
`
`Business Confidential Information and Keep it Separate from File of US Patent
`
`No. 7,834, 586 under 37 C.F.R. § 42.74 were served upon the following, by
`
`electronic mail:
`
`MCDERMOTT WILL & EMERY
`Charles M. McMahon
`cmcmahon@mwe.com
`
`10541414
`
`- 6 -
`
`

`

`Case IPR2018-00274
`Patent No. 7,834,586
`
`Hersh H. Mehta
`hmehta@mwe.com
`
`/Susan M. Langworthy/
` Susan M. Langworthy
`
`10541414
`
`- 7 -
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket