throbber
Paper 33
`Entered: December 20, 2018
`
`Trials@uspto.gov
`571-272-7822
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`_____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`INTEL CORPORATION and CAVIUM, LLC,1
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`ALACRITECH, INC.,
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`
`Case IPR2018-00226 (Patent 7,124,205 B2)
`Case IPR2018-00234 (Patent 8,805,948 B2)
`____________
`
`Before STEPHEN C. SIU, DANIEL N. FISHMAN, and
`CHARLES J. BOUDREAU, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`BOUDREAU, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`
`ORDER
`Granting Petitioner’s Motion for Protective Order
`37 C.F.R. § 42.54
`
`
`
`1 Cavium, Inc., which filed petitions in Cases IPR2018-00400 and IPR2018-00403
`was joined as a petitioner in IPR2018-00226 and IPR2018-00234. According to
`updated mandatory notices filed in the captioned proceedings, Cavium, Inc. has
`now been converted to Cavium, LLC. See, e.g., IPR2018-00226, Paper 28.
`
`

`

`
`
`Case IPR2018-00226 (Patent 7,124,205 B2)
`Case IPR2018-00234 (Patent 8,805,948 B2)
`
`
`With leave from the Board, Petitioner filed a Motion for a Revised
`Protective Order in each of the above-captioned cases. IPR2018-00226, Paper 38;
`IPR2018-00234, Paper 32 (collectively “Motions”). Along with the Motions,
`Petitioner filed the proposed revised Stipulated Protective Order as Exhibit 1400 in
`each case (“Revised Protective Order”). In each case, Petitioner also filed as
`Exhibits 1401 and 1402, respectively: (1) a redlined version of the proposed
`Revised Protective Order showing changes relative to the Stipulated Protective
`Order previously filed by Patent Owner as “Appendix A” to a Motion to File
`Under Seal (see IPR2018-00226, Paper 22, 5–8; IPR2018-00234, Paper 17, 5–8)
`and orally entered in each case (IPR2018-00226, Ex. 2401, 33:2–6;
`IPR2018-00234, Ex. 2401, 33:2–6); and (2) a redlined version of the proposed
`Revised Protective Order showing changes relative to the Board’s default
`protective order provided in the Office Trial Practice Guide. Petitioner represents
`that the parties met and conferred and that Patent Owner does not oppose the
`proposed Revised Protective Order. Motions 1.
`We have reviewed the form of the proposed Revised Protective Order
`(Ex. 1400) and find it differs in substance from the Stipulated Protective Order
`previously entered principally in its addition of a new “PETITIONER’S
`RESTRICTED – ATTORNEY’S EYES ONLY” tier (see Exhibit 1401). We find
`the terms to be reasonable, and we, accordingly, grant Petitioner’ Motion for a
`Revised Protective Order and enter the Revised Protective Order in each case.
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`

`

`Case IPR2018-00226 (Patent 7,124,205 B2)
`Case IPR2018-00234 (Patent 8,805,948 B2)
`
`
`
`
`
`It is, therefore,
`ORDERED that Petitioner’s Motion for a Revised Protective Order in each
`of the above-captioned cases (IPR2018-00226, Paper 38; IPR2018-00234,
`Paper 32) is granted;
`FURTHER ORDERED that the Revised Protective Order filed as Exhibit
`1400 in each case is entered in each of IPR2018-00226 and IPR2018-00234; and
`FURTHER ORDERED that the Revised Protective Order hereby supersedes
`the Stipulated Protective Order previously filed by Patent Owner as Appendix A to
`its Motion to File Under Seal filed in each of the above-captioned cases
`(IPR2018-00226, Paper 22; IPR2018-00234, Paper 17) and entered by the Board
`(IPR2018-00226, Ex. 2401, 33:2–6; IPR2018-00234, Ex. 2401, 33:2–6).
`
`3
`
`
`

`

`
`
`Case IPR2018-00226 (Patent 7,124,205 B2)
`Case IPR2018-00234 (Patent 8,805,948 B2)
`
`
`FOR PETITIONER INTEL CORPORATION:
`Garland T. Stephens
`Melissa L. Hotze
`Justin C. Constant
`Anne M. Capella
`Adrian Percer
`Amanda Branch
`William S. Ansley
`WEIL, GOTSHAL & MANGES LLP
`garland.stephens@weil.com
`melissa.hotze@weil.com
`justin.constant@weil.com
`anne.cappella@weil.com
`adrian.percer@weil.com
`amanda.branch@weil.com
`sutton.ansley@weil.com
`
`FOR PETITIONER CAVIUM, LLC:
`
`David Xue
`Karineh Khachatourian
`RIMÔN LAW
`david.xue@rimonlaw.com
`karinehk@rimonlaw.com
`
`
`FOR PATENT OWNER:
`James M. Glass
`Joseph M. Paunovich
`Brian E. Mack
`QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN LLP
`jimglass@quinnemanuel.com
`joepaunovich@quinnemanuel.com
`brianmack@quinnemanuel.com
`
`
`4
`
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket