`571-272-7822
`
`Paper 44
`Date: February 6, 2019
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`_____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`____________
`
`INTEL CORP., CAVIUM, LLC, and DELL INC.,1
`Petitioner
`
`v.
`
`ALACRITECH, INC.
`Patent Owner
`____________
`
`Case IPR2018-00226 (Patent 7,124,205 B2)
`Case IPR2018-00234 (Patent 8,805,948 B2)
`
`____________
`
`Before STEPHEN C. SIU and DANIEL N. FISHMAN,
`Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`SIU, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`ORDER
`Motion for Pro Hac Vice Admission
`37 C.F.R. § 42.10
`
`1 Cavium LLC, which filed petitions in Cases IPR2018-00400 and IPR2018-
`00403, and Dell, which filed petitioner in Cases IPR2018-01306 and IPR2018-
`01307, were joined as a petitioner in IPR2018-00226 and IPR2018-00234,
`respectively.
`
`
`
`Case IPR2018-00226 (Patent 7,124,205 B2)
`Case IPR2018-00234 (Patent 8,805,948 B2)
`
`
`In each of the identified cases, Petitioner filed a motion for pro hac vice
`
`
`
`admission of Daniel R. Volkmuth and accompanying affidavit. See, e.g., IPR2018-
`
`00226, Paper 49, Exhibit 2500 and IPR2018-00234, Paper 40, Exhibit 2500. The
`
`motions are unopposed. The motions are granted.
`
`Petitioner shall update PTABE2E records and shall submit an updated power
`
`of attorney including Daniel R. Volkmuth. Counsel recognized pro hac vice shall
`
`comply with 37 C.F.R. Parts 11 and 42 and the Office Patent Trial Practice Guide,
`
`77 Fed. Reg. 48,755 (Aug. 14, 2012), and is subject to disciplinary jurisdiction
`
`under 37 C.F.R. § 11.19(a).
`
`
`
`It is
`
`ORDERED that the Petitioner’s motions for pro hac vice admission of
`
`Daniel R. Volkmuth for the above-identified proceedings are granted; Daniel R.
`
`Volkmuth is authorized to represent Petitioner only as back-up counsel in the
`
`above-identified proceedings;
`
`FURTHER ORDERED that Daniel R. Volkmuth is to comply with the
`
`Office Patent Trial Practice Guide and the Board’s Rules of Practice for Trials, as
`
`set forth is Part 42 of Title 37, Code of Federal Regulations, and is subject to the
`
`Office’s disciplinary jurisdiction under 37 C.F.R. § 11.19(a), and the USPTO
`
`Rules of Professional Conduct set forth in 37 C.F.R. §§ 11.101 et seq.; and
`
`FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner is to continue to have a registered
`
`practitioner represent it as lead counsel in the above-identified proceedings.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`
`Case IPR2018-00226 (Patent 7,124,205 B2)
`Case IPR2018-00234 (Patent 8,805,948 B2)
`
`
`For PETITIONER
`
`
`
`Garland T. Stephens
`Anne Cappella
`Adrian Percer
`garland.stephens@weil.com
`anne.cappella@weil.com
`adrian.percer@weil.com
`
`David T. Xue
`Karineh Khatchatourian
`david.xue@rimonlaw.com
`karinehk@rimonlaw.com
`
`Christopher TL Douglas
`Kirk Bradley
`Derek S. Neilson
`christopher.douglas@alston.com
`kirk.bradley@alston.com
`derek.neilson@alston.com
`
`
`For PATENT OWNER
`
`James M. Glass
`Joseph M. Paunovich
`Brian E. Mack
`Ziyong Li
`jimglass@quinnemanuel.com
`joepaunovich@quinnemanuel.com
`brianmack@quinnemanuel.com
`seanli@quinnemanuel.com
`
`Mark Lauer
`mark@siliconedgelaw.com
`
`
`3
`
`
`