throbber
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`______________________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`______________________
`
`INTEL CORP., CAVIUM, LLC, and DELL INC.,
`Petitioners,
`
`v.
`
`ALACRITECH, INC.,
`Patent Owner.
`______________________
`
`Case IPR2018-002341
`U.S. Patent No. 8,805,948
`______________________
`
`PETITIONER’S REQUEST FOR
`ORAL ARGUMENT PURSUANT TO 37 C.F.R. § 42.70(a)
`
`
`
`Mail Stop “PATENT BOARD”
`Patent Trial and Appeal Board
`U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
`P.O. Box 1450
`Alexandria, VA 22313-1450
`
`
`1 Cavium LLC (formerly Cavium, Inc.), which filed a Petition in Case IPR2018-
`
`00403, and Dell Inc., which filed a Petition in Case IPR2018-01307, have been
`
`joined as petitioners in this proceeding.
`
`
`
`

`

`
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.70(a), Petitioner respectfully requests oral
`
`argument on the issues set forth below. Oral argument is presently scheduled for
`
`March 4, 2019. (Scheduling Order, Paper 8). Petitioner requests 1 hour (2 hours in
`
`total if Patent Owner also is allotted 1 hour) for all 3 IPRs (IPR2018-00226,
`
`IPR2018-00234, IPR2018-00401) being heard at the Oral Argument. Petitioner
`
`further requests that the hearing be split into two sessions, where 20 minutes per
`
`side (40 minutes in total) is closed to the public to allow for presentation of
`
`PETITIONER’S RESTRICTED – ATTORNEY’S EYES ONLY material related
`
`to real parties-in-interest. To accommodate this, Petitioner requests that the Board
`
`implement a procedure similar to that adopted in Baker Hughes Incorporated v.
`
`LiquidPower Specialty Products, Inc., IPR2016-00734, Paper 68 (PTAB May 31,
`
`2017) and in Snap-On Inc. v. Milwaukee Electric Tool Corp., IPR2015-01242,
`
`Paper 59 (Aug. 18, 2016), in which the hearing room was closed to the public for a
`
`portion of the hearing to allow for the presentation of confidential information.
`
`Petitioner respectfully requests oral argument on all instituted grounds and
`
`all related issues, specifically:
`
`I. Whether claims 1, 3, 6-8, 17, 19, and 21-22 of the 948 Patent are
`
`unpatentable as obvious over Thia, Tanenbaum96 and Steven2, under
`
`35 U.S.C. § 103.
`
`
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`II. Whether the Petition was filed more than one year after the date on
`
`which alleged real parties-in-interest were served with a complaint
`
`alleging infringement of the 948 Patent.
`
`III. Whether the Petition correctly named all real parties-in-interest.
`
`IV. Respond to Patent Owner’s presentation on all matters.
`
`V. Any issues specified by Patent Owner in a Request for Oral
`
`Argument.
`
`VI. Any other issues the Board deems necessary for issuing a final written
`
`decision.
`
`
`
`Dated: January 28, 2019
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`/s/ Garland T. Stephens
`Garland T. Stephens, Reg. No. 37,242
`Justin L. Constant, Reg. No. 66,883
`Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP
`700 Louisiana, Suite 1700
`Houston, TX 77002
`Tel: (713) 546-5000
`Fax: (713) 224-9511
`garland.stephens@weil.com
`justin.constant@weil.com
`Anne M. Cappella, Reg. No. 43,217
`Adrian Percer, Reg. No. 46,986
`Amanda Branch (admitted pro hac vice)
`Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP
`201 Redwood Shores Parkway
`Redwood Shores, CA 94065
`3
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`Tel: (650) 802-3000
`Fax: (650) 802-3100
`anne.cappella@weil.com
`adrian.percer@weil.com
`amanda.branch@weil.com
`
`William S. Ansley, Reg. No. 67,828
`Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP
`2001 M Street, N.W, Suite 600
`Washington, DC 20036
`Tel: (202) 682-7000
`Fax: (202) 857-0940
`sutton.ansley@weil.com
`
`Attorneys for Petitioner Intel Corporation
`
`4
`
`

`

`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`I hereby certify that on January 28, 2019, a copy of PETITIONER’S
`
`REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT PURSUANT TO 37 C.F.R. § 42.70(a)
`
`was served by filing this document through the PTAB’s E2E Filing System as well
`
`as delivering a copy via electronic mail upon the following:
`
`James M. Glass
`Registration No. 46,729
`Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan LLP
`51 Madison Ave., 22nd Fl.
`New York, NY 10010
`Tel.: (212) 849-7000
`Email: jimglass@quinnemanuel.com
`Joseph M. Paunovich
`Registration No. 59,033
`Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan LLP
`865 S. Figueroa Street, 10th Fl.
`Los Angeles, CA 90017
`Tel.: (213) 443-3000
`Email: joepaunovich@quinnemanuel.com
`Brian E. Mack
`Registration No. 57,189
`Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan LLP
`50 California Street, 22nd Fl.
`San Francisco, CA 94111
`Tel.: (415) 875-6600
`Email: brianmack@quinnemanuel.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`
`
`Mark Lauer
`Registration No. 36,578
`Silicon Edge Law Group LLP
`7901 Stoneridge Dr., Ste. 528
`Pleasanton, CA 94588
`Tel.: (925) 621-2121
`Email: mark@siliconedgelaw.com
`
`Dated: January 28, 2019
`
`/s/ Garland T. Stephens
`Garland T. Stephens
`Reg. No. 37,242
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket