DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`INTEL CORPORATION, et al.
`v.
`ALACRITECH, INC.
`
`Case Nos.
`IPR2018-00226, IPR2018-00234, IPR2018-00401
`
`PATENT OWNER DEMONSTRATIVES
`CONCERNING RPI / PRIVY TIME BAR
`
`Hearing: March 4, 2019
`
`
`
`IPR2018-00226, -00234, -00410 RPI / Privy PO Demonstrative, 11
`
`
`
`INTEL CORPORATION, et al.
`v.
`ALACRITECH, INC.
`
`Case Nos.
`IPR2018-00226, IPR2018-00234, IPR2018-00401
`
`PATENT OWNER DEMONSTRATIVES
`CONCERNING RPI / PRIVY TIME BAR
`
`Hearing: March 4, 2019
`
`
`
`IPR2018-00226, -00234, -00410 RPI / Privy PO Demonstrative, 11
`
`
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`RPIs and Privies Bar Petitions
`
`35 U.S.C. § 312(a)
`
`“A petition filed under section 311 may be considered only if
`… the petition identifies all real parties in interest.”
`
`35 U.S.C. § 315(b)
`
`“An inter partes review may not be instituted if the petition
`requesting the proceeding is filed more than 1 year after … the
`petitioner, real party in interest, or privy of the petitioner is
`served with a complaint alleging infringement of the patent.”
`
`IPR2018-00226, -00234, -00410 RPI / Privy PO Demonstrative, 2
`
`
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`35 USC 315(b) Bars Petitions
`
`IPR2018-00226 – ’205 Patent
`
`May 9, 2017
`Intel: IPR2017-01402 [‘205]
`
`July 5, 2017: one year bar date of Dell;
`July 6, 2017: one year bar date of Wistron;
`July 7, 2017: one year bar date of CenturyLink.
`
`July 3, 2017
`Cavium: IPR2017-01734
`[‘205] (duplicate of
`IPR2017-01402)
`
`May
`2017
`
`Jun.
`2017
`
`Jul.
`2017
`
`Aug.
`2017
`
`Sep.
`2017
`
`Oct.
`2017
`
`Nov.
`2017
`
`Dec.
`2017
`
`. . .
`
`Ex. 2057 (-00226) at 1
`
`Nov. 21, 2017
`Intel: IPR2018-00226 [’205];
`
`Dec. 27, 2017
`Cavium: IPR2018-00400
`[’205] (joined IPR2018-
`00226)
`
`July 3, 2018
`Dell: IPR2018-01306
`[‘205] (moved to join
`IPR2018-00226)
`Jul.
`2018
`
`. . .
`
`IPR2018-00226, -00234, -00410 RPI / Privy PO Demonstrative, 3
`
`
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`35 USC 315(b) Bars Petitions
`
`IPR2018-00234 -- ’948 Patent
`
`May 9, 2017
`Intel: IPR2017-01395 [’948]
`
`July 5, 2017: one year bar date of Dell;
`July 6, 2017: one year bar date of Wistron;
`July 7, 2017: one year bar date of CenturyLink.
`
`July 1, 2017
`Cavium: IPR2017-01729
`[’948] (duplicate of
`IPR2017-01395)
`
`May
`2017
`
`Jun.
`2017
`
`Jul.
`2017
`
`Aug.
`2017
`
`Sep.
`2017
`
`Oct.
`2017
`
`Nov.
`2017
`
`Dec.
`2017
`
`. . .
`
`Ex. 2057 (-00234) at 1
`
`Nov. 22, 2017
`Intel: IPR2018-00234 [’948];
`
`Dec. 27, 2017
`Cavium: IPR2018-00403
`[’948] (joined IPR2018-
`00234)
`
`July 3, 2018
`Dell: IPR2018-01307
`[’948] (moved to join
`IPR2018-00234)
`Jul.
`2018
`
`. . .
`
`IPR2018-00226, -00234, -00410 RPI / Privy PO Demonstrative, 4
`
`
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`35 USC 315(b) Bars Petitions
`
`IPR2018-00401 -- ’699 Patent
`
`June 30, 2017
`Cavium: IPR2017-01711 [‘699]
`(duplicate of IPR2017-01559)
`
`July 5, 2017: one year bar date of Dell;
`July 6, 2017: one year bar date of Wistron;
`July 7, 2017: one year bar date of CenturyLink.
`
`Dec. 27, 2017
`Cavium: IPR2018-00401 [‘699]
`
`June 9, 2017
`Intel Petitions:
`IPR2017-01559 [‘699]
`
`May
`2017
`
`Jun.
`2017
`
`Jul.
`2017
`
`Aug.
`2017
`
`Sep.
`2017
`
`Oct.
`2017
`
`Nov.
`2017
`
`Dec.
`2017
`
`. . .
`
`Ex. 2057 (-00401) at 1
`
`July 3, 2018
`Intel: IPR2018-01352
`[’699] (moved to join
`IPR2018-00401)
`Jul.
`2018
`
`. . .
`
`IPR2018-00226, -00234, -00410 RPI / Privy PO Demonstrative, 5
`
`
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`Required Analysis for RPIs and Privies Has Changed
`
`“It is clear that AIT [Applications in Internet Time, LLC v.
`RPX Corp., 897 F.3d 1336 (Fed. Cir. July 9, 2018), reh’g en
`banc denied, (Fed. Cir. Oct. 23, 2018)] changed prior
`practices of the Board such that our review of real party-
`in-interest and privity issues must extend beyond a
`narrow view focused solely on control or the opportunity
`to control a proceeding before the Board.”
`Board’s RPI/Privy Discovery Order, IPR2018-00226, Paper 36 at 8, see
`also IPR2018-00234, Paper 31 at 8, IPR2018-00401, Paper 24 at 7.
`
`IPR2018-00226, -00234, -00410 RPI / Privy PO Demonstrative, 6
`
`
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`Required Analysis for RPIs and Privies Has Changed
`
`Board’s RPI/Privy Discovery Order, IPR2018-00226, Paper 36 at 6, see
`also IPR2018-00234, Paper 31 at 6, IPR2018-00401, Paper 24 at 6.
`
`IPR2018-00226, -00234, -00410 RPI / Privy PO Demonstrative, 7
`
`
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`Required Analysis for RPIs and Privies Has Changed
`
`Board’s RPI/Privy Discovery Order, IPR2018-00226, Paper 36 at 7, see
`also IPR2018-00234, Paper 31 at 7, IPR2018-00401, Paper 24 at 6.
`IPR2018-00226, -00234, -00410 RPI / Privy PO Demonstrative, 8
`
`
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`Required Analysis for RPIs and Privies Has Changed
`
`Board’s RPI/Privy Discovery Order, IPR2018-00226, Paper 36 at 7, see
`also IPR2018-00234, Paper 31 at 7, IPR2018-00401, Paper 24 at 7.
`
`IPR2018-00226, -00234, -00410 RPI / Privy PO Demonstrative, 9
`
`
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`Required Analysis for RPIs and Privies Has Changed
`
`Board’s RPI/Privy Discovery Order, IPR2018-00226, Paper 36 at 7, see
`also IPR2018-00234, Paper 31 at 7, IPR2018-00401, Paper 24 at 7.
`
`IPR2018-00226, -00234, -00410 RPI / Privy PO Demonstrative, 10
`
`
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`Evaluating Real Party-In-Interest and Privy
`
`“Determining whether a non-party is a ‘real party in interest’
`demands a flexible approach that takes into account both
`equitable and practical considerations, with an eye toward
`determining whether the non-party is a clear beneficiary that
`has a preexisting, established relationship with the petitioner.
`
`Applications in Internet Time, LLC v. RPX Corp., 897 F.3d 1336, 1351 (Fed. Cir., July 9, 2018)
`
`IPR2018-00226, -00234, -00410 RPI / Privy PO Demonstrative, 11
`
`
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`At Least Dell Is A Real Party-In-Interest and Privy
`
`Board’s RPI/Privy Discovery Order, IPR2018-00226, Paper 36 at 9, see
`also IPR2018-00234, Paper 31 at 9, IPR2018-00401, Paper 24 at 9.
`IPR2018-00226, -00234, -00410 RPI / Privy PO Demonstrative, 12
`
`
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`IPR2018-00226, -00234, -00410 RPI / Privy PO Demonstrative, 13
`
`
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`IPR2018-00226, -00234, -00410 RPI / Privy PO Demonstrative, 14
`
`
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`IPR2018-00226, -00234, -00410 RPI / Privy PO Demonstrative, 15
`
`
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`At Least Dell Is A Real Party-In-Interest and Privy To Intel
`
`PO Response, IPR2018-00226, Paper 23 at 56-57, see also IPR2018-00234, Paper 18 at
`60-61, IPR2018-00401, Paper 15 at 44. Ex. 2051, 2052, 2053.
`
`IPR2018-00226, -00234, -00410 RPI / Privy PO Demonstrative, 16
`
`
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`IPR2018-00226, -00234, -00410 RPI / Privy PO Demonstrative, 17
`
`
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`At Least Dell Is A Real Party-In-Interest and Privy To Intel
`
`PO Response, IPR2018-00226, Paper 23 at 56-57, see also IPR2018-00234, Paper 18 at
`60-61, IPR2018-00401, Paper 15 at 44. Ex. 2051, 2052, 2053.
`
`IPR2018-00226, -00234, -00410 RPI / Privy PO Demonstrative, 18
`
`
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`At Least Dell Is A Real Party-In-Interest and Privy To Intel
`
`PO Supp. RPI Brief, IPR2018-00226, Paper 58 at 4, see also IPR2018-00234, Paper 49 at
`4, IPR2018-00401, Paper 45 at 4. Ex. 2505.
`
`IPR2018-00226, -00234, -00410 RPI / Privy PO Demonstrative, 19
`
`
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`IPR2018-00226, -00234, -00410 RPI / Privy PO Demonstrative, 20
`
`
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`At Least Dell Is A Real Party-In-Interest and Privy To Cavium
`
`PO Response, IPR2018-00226, Paper 23 at 57, see also IPR2018-00234, Paper 18 at 61,
`IPR2018-00401, Paper 15 at 45. Ex. 2055.
`
`IPR2018-00226, -00234, -00410 RPI / Privy PO Demonstrative, 21
`
`
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`At Least Dell Is A Real Party-In-Interest and Privy To Cavium
`
`PO Response, IPR2018-00226, Paper 23 at 57, see also IPR2018-00234, Paper 18 at 61,
`IPR2018-00401, Paper 15 at 45. Ex. 2055.
`
`IPR2018-00226, -00234, -00410 RPI / Privy PO Demonstrative, 22
`
`
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`At Least Dell Is A Real Party-In-Interest and Privy To Cavium
`
`Alacritech’s District Complaint against Dell Ex. 1416
`
`IPR2018-00226, -00234, -00410 RPI / Privy PO Demonstrative, 23
`
`
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`At Least Dell Is A Real Party-In-Interest and Privy To Cavium
`
`Cavium’s Declaratory Judgment Complaint in Intervention.
`
`IPR2018-00226, -00234, -00410 RPI / Privy PO Demonstrative, 24
`
`
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`Board’s RPI/Privy Discovery Order
`
`• Discovery order compelled
`production of documents
`related to admitted indemnity
`and defense relationships
`
`• Petitioners failed to produce
`documents and/or improperly
`claim common interest and/or
`work product protections over
`arms-length non-privileged and
`non-work product discussions
`
`Board’s RPI/Privy Discovery Order, IPR2018-
`00226, Paper 36, see also IPR2018-00234,
`Paper 31, IPR2018-00401, Paper 24.
`
`IPR2018-00226, -00234, -00410 RPI / Privy PO Demonstrative, 25
`
`
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`Board’s RPI/Privy Discovery Order
`
`Board’s RPI/Privy Discovery Order, IPR2018-00226, Paper 36 at 12-13, see also IPR2018-00234, Paper
`31 at 12-13, IPR2018-00401, Paper 24 at 12-13.
`
`IPR2018-00226, -00234, -00410 RPI / Privy PO Demonstrative, 26
`
`
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`Board’s RPI/Privy Discovery Order
`
`Ex. 2400 at 1
`
`IPR2018-00226, -00234, -00410 RPI / Privy PO Demonstrative, 27
`
`
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`Board’s RPI/Privy Discovery Order
`
`Ex. 2400 at 1
`
`IPR2018-00226, -00234, -00410 RPI / Privy PO Demonstrative, 28
`
`
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`Board’s RPI/Privy Discovery Order
`
`Ex. 2400 at 2
`
`IPR2018-00226, -00234, -00410 RPI / Privy PO Demonstrative, 29
`
`
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`Board’s RPI/Privy Discovery Order
`
`Ex. 2400 at 2
`
`IPR2018-00226, -00234, -00410 RPI / Privy PO Demonstrative, 30
`
`
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`Petitioners Admit RPI/Privy Evidence Exists
`
`Board’s RPI/Privy Discovery Order, IPR2018-00226, Paper 36 at 11, see also IPR2018-00234, Paper 31
`at 11, IPR2018-00401, Paper 24 at 10-11.
`
`IPR2018-00226, -00234, -00410 RPI / Privy PO Demonstrative, 31
`
`
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`Petitioners Admit RPI/Privy Evidence Exists
`
`Board’s RPI/Privy Discovery Order, IPR2018-00226, Paper 36 at 10, see also IPR2018-00234, Paper 31
`at 10, IPR2018-00401, Paper 24 at 10.
`
`IPR2018-00226, -00234, -00410 RPI / Privy PO Demonstrative, 32
`
`
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`Evaluating Real Party-In-Interest and Privy
`
`“Thus, when it comes to evaluating the relationship between a
`party bringing a suit and a non-party, the common law seeks to
`ascertain who, from a ‘practical and equitable’ standpoint, will
`benefit from the redress that the chosen tribunal might provide.
`See Trial Practice Guide, 77 Fed. Reg. at 48,759. Indeed, the PTO
`correctly recognizes that the related concept of privity ‘is an
`equitable rule that takes into account the “practical situation,”
`and should extend to parties to transactions and other activities
`relating to the property in question.’ Id. (citing 157 Cong. Rec.
`S1376 (Mar. 8, 2011) (statement of Sen. Kyl) ).”
`
`Applications in Internet Time, LLC v. RPX Corp., 897 F.3d 1336, 1349 (Fed. Cir., July 9, 2018)
`
`IPR2018-00226, -00234, -00410 RPI / Privy PO Demonstrative, 33
`
`
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`6/30/2016 Alacritech Filed the Complaint Against Dell
`
`10/31/2016 Intel Filed Its Motion to Intervene
`
`Exs. 2501, 2051, 2058
`
`IPR2018-00226, -00234, -00410 RPI / Privy PO Demonstrative, 34
`
`
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`IPR2018-00226, -00234, -00410 RPI / Privy PO Demonstrative, 35
`
`
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`IPR2018-00226, -00234, -00410 RPI / Privy PO Demonstrative, 36
`
`
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`Cavium Privilege Log Relating to Court Litigation
`
`6/30/2016 Alacritech Filed the Complaint Against Dell
`
`10/31/2016 Intel Filed Its Motion to Intervene
`
`1/13/2017 Cavium Filed Its Motion to Intervene
`
`Exs. 1454, 2051, 2055
`
`IPR2018-00226, -00234, -00410 RPI / Privy PO Demonstrative, 37
`
`
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`Cavium Claims Comment Interest With Dell
`
`Ex. 1454
`
`IPR2018-00226, -00234, -00410 RPI / Privy PO Demonstrative, 38
`
`
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`Cavium’s Harnois Declaration Is Bare Attorney Argument
`
`Ex. 1500 at 1-2.
`
`IPR2018-00226, -00234, -00410 RPI / Privy PO Demonstrative, 39
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
