`
`INTEL CORPORATION, et al.
`v.
`ALACRITECH, INC.
`
`Case Nos.
`IPR2018-00226, IPR2018-00234, IPR2018-00401
`
`PATENT OWNER DEMONSTRATIVES
`CONCERNING RPI / PRIVY TIME BAR
`
`Hearing: March 4, 2019
`
`
`
`IPR2018-00226, -00234, -00410 RPI / Privy PO Demonstrative, 11
`
`
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`RPIs and Privies Bar Petitions
`
`35 U.S.C. § 312(a)
`
`“A petition filed under section 311 may be considered only if
`… the petition identifies all real parties in interest.”
`
`35 U.S.C. § 315(b)
`
`“An inter partes review may not be instituted if the petition
`requesting the proceeding is filed more than 1 year after … the
`petitioner, real party in interest, or privy of the petitioner is
`served with a complaint alleging infringement of the patent.”
`
`IPR2018-00226, -00234, -00410 RPI / Privy PO Demonstrative, 2
`
`
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`35 USC 315(b) Bars Petitions
`
`IPR2018-00226 – ’205 Patent
`
`May 9, 2017
`Intel: IPR2017-01402 [‘205]
`
`July 5, 2017: one year bar date of Dell;
`July 6, 2017: one year bar date of Wistron;
`July 7, 2017: one year bar date of CenturyLink.
`
`July 3, 2017
`Cavium: IPR2017-01734
`[‘205] (duplicate of
`IPR2017-01402)
`
`May
`2017
`
`Jun.
`2017
`
`Jul.
`2017
`
`Aug.
`2017
`
`Sep.
`2017
`
`Oct.
`2017
`
`Nov.
`2017
`
`Dec.
`2017
`
`. . .
`
`Ex. 2057 (-00226) at 1
`
`Nov. 21, 2017
`Intel: IPR2018-00226 [’205];
`
`Dec. 27, 2017
`Cavium: IPR2018-00400
`[’205] (joined IPR2018-
`00226)
`
`July 3, 2018
`Dell: IPR2018-01306
`[‘205] (moved to join
`IPR2018-00226)
`Jul.
`2018
`
`. . .
`
`IPR2018-00226, -00234, -00410 RPI / Privy PO Demonstrative, 3
`
`
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`35 USC 315(b) Bars Petitions
`
`IPR2018-00234 -- ’948 Patent
`
`May 9, 2017
`Intel: IPR2017-01395 [’948]
`
`July 5, 2017: one year bar date of Dell;
`July 6, 2017: one year bar date of Wistron;
`July 7, 2017: one year bar date of CenturyLink.
`
`July 1, 2017
`Cavium: IPR2017-01729
`[’948] (duplicate of
`IPR2017-01395)
`
`May
`2017
`
`Jun.
`2017
`
`Jul.
`2017
`
`Aug.
`2017
`
`Sep.
`2017
`
`Oct.
`2017
`
`Nov.
`2017
`
`Dec.
`2017
`
`. . .
`
`Ex. 2057 (-00234) at 1
`
`Nov. 22, 2017
`Intel: IPR2018-00234 [’948];
`
`Dec. 27, 2017
`Cavium: IPR2018-00403
`[’948] (joined IPR2018-
`00234)
`
`July 3, 2018
`Dell: IPR2018-01307
`[’948] (moved to join
`IPR2018-00234)
`Jul.
`2018
`
`. . .
`
`IPR2018-00226, -00234, -00410 RPI / Privy PO Demonstrative, 4
`
`
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`35 USC 315(b) Bars Petitions
`
`IPR2018-00401 -- ’699 Patent
`
`June 30, 2017
`Cavium: IPR2017-01711 [‘699]
`(duplicate of IPR2017-01559)
`
`July 5, 2017: one year bar date of Dell;
`July 6, 2017: one year bar date of Wistron;
`July 7, 2017: one year bar date of CenturyLink.
`
`Dec. 27, 2017
`Cavium: IPR2018-00401 [‘699]
`
`June 9, 2017
`Intel Petitions:
`IPR2017-01559 [‘699]
`
`May
`2017
`
`Jun.
`2017
`
`Jul.
`2017
`
`Aug.
`2017
`
`Sep.
`2017
`
`Oct.
`2017
`
`Nov.
`2017
`
`Dec.
`2017
`
`. . .
`
`Ex. 2057 (-00401) at 1
`
`July 3, 2018
`Intel: IPR2018-01352
`[’699] (moved to join
`IPR2018-00401)
`Jul.
`2018
`
`. . .
`
`IPR2018-00226, -00234, -00410 RPI / Privy PO Demonstrative, 5
`
`
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`Required Analysis for RPIs and Privies Has Changed
`
`“It is clear that AIT [Applications in Internet Time, LLC v.
`RPX Corp., 897 F.3d 1336 (Fed. Cir. July 9, 2018), reh’g en
`banc denied, (Fed. Cir. Oct. 23, 2018)] changed prior
`practices of the Board such that our review of real party-
`in-interest and privity issues must extend beyond a
`narrow view focused solely on control or the opportunity
`to control a proceeding before the Board.”
`Board’s RPI/Privy Discovery Order, IPR2018-00226, Paper 36 at 8, see
`also IPR2018-00234, Paper 31 at 8, IPR2018-00401, Paper 24 at 7.
`
`IPR2018-00226, -00234, -00410 RPI / Privy PO Demonstrative, 6
`
`
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`Required Analysis for RPIs and Privies Has Changed
`
`Board’s RPI/Privy Discovery Order, IPR2018-00226, Paper 36 at 6, see
`also IPR2018-00234, Paper 31 at 6, IPR2018-00401, Paper 24 at 6.
`
`IPR2018-00226, -00234, -00410 RPI / Privy PO Demonstrative, 7
`
`
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`Required Analysis for RPIs and Privies Has Changed
`
`Board’s RPI/Privy Discovery Order, IPR2018-00226, Paper 36 at 7, see
`also IPR2018-00234, Paper 31 at 7, IPR2018-00401, Paper 24 at 6.
`IPR2018-00226, -00234, -00410 RPI / Privy PO Demonstrative, 8
`
`
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`Required Analysis for RPIs and Privies Has Changed
`
`Board’s RPI/Privy Discovery Order, IPR2018-00226, Paper 36 at 7, see
`also IPR2018-00234, Paper 31 at 7, IPR2018-00401, Paper 24 at 7.
`
`IPR2018-00226, -00234, -00410 RPI / Privy PO Demonstrative, 9
`
`
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`Required Analysis for RPIs and Privies Has Changed
`
`Board’s RPI/Privy Discovery Order, IPR2018-00226, Paper 36 at 7, see
`also IPR2018-00234, Paper 31 at 7, IPR2018-00401, Paper 24 at 7.
`
`IPR2018-00226, -00234, -00410 RPI / Privy PO Demonstrative, 10
`
`
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`Evaluating Real Party-In-Interest and Privy
`
`“Determining whether a non-party is a ‘real party in interest’
`demands a flexible approach that takes into account both
`equitable and practical considerations, with an eye toward
`determining whether the non-party is a clear beneficiary that
`has a preexisting, established relationship with the petitioner.
`
`Applications in Internet Time, LLC v. RPX Corp., 897 F.3d 1336, 1351 (Fed. Cir., July 9, 2018)
`
`IPR2018-00226, -00234, -00410 RPI / Privy PO Demonstrative, 11
`
`
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`At Least Dell Is A Real Party-In-Interest and Privy
`
`Board’s RPI/Privy Discovery Order, IPR2018-00226, Paper 36 at 9, see
`also IPR2018-00234, Paper 31 at 9, IPR2018-00401, Paper 24 at 9.
`IPR2018-00226, -00234, -00410 RPI / Privy PO Demonstrative, 12
`
`
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`IPR2018-00226, -00234, -00410 RPI / Privy PO Demonstrative, 13
`
`
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`IPR2018-00226, -00234, -00410 RPI / Privy PO Demonstrative, 14
`
`
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`IPR2018-00226, -00234, -00410 RPI / Privy PO Demonstrative, 15
`
`
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`At Least Dell Is A Real Party-In-Interest and Privy To Intel
`
`PO Response, IPR2018-00226, Paper 23 at 56-57, see also IPR2018-00234, Paper 18 at
`60-61, IPR2018-00401, Paper 15 at 44. Ex. 2051, 2052, 2053.
`
`IPR2018-00226, -00234, -00410 RPI / Privy PO Demonstrative, 16
`
`
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`IPR2018-00226, -00234, -00410 RPI / Privy PO Demonstrative, 17
`
`
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`At Least Dell Is A Real Party-In-Interest and Privy To Intel
`
`PO Response, IPR2018-00226, Paper 23 at 56-57, see also IPR2018-00234, Paper 18 at
`60-61, IPR2018-00401, Paper 15 at 44. Ex. 2051, 2052, 2053.
`
`IPR2018-00226, -00234, -00410 RPI / Privy PO Demonstrative, 18
`
`
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`At Least Dell Is A Real Party-In-Interest and Privy To Intel
`
`PO Supp. RPI Brief, IPR2018-00226, Paper 58 at 4, see also IPR2018-00234, Paper 49 at
`4, IPR2018-00401, Paper 45 at 4. Ex. 2505.
`
`IPR2018-00226, -00234, -00410 RPI / Privy PO Demonstrative, 19
`
`
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`IPR2018-00226, -00234, -00410 RPI / Privy PO Demonstrative, 20
`
`
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`At Least Dell Is A Real Party-In-Interest and Privy To Cavium
`
`PO Response, IPR2018-00226, Paper 23 at 57, see also IPR2018-00234, Paper 18 at 61,
`IPR2018-00401, Paper 15 at 45. Ex. 2055.
`
`IPR2018-00226, -00234, -00410 RPI / Privy PO Demonstrative, 21
`
`
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`At Least Dell Is A Real Party-In-Interest and Privy To Cavium
`
`PO Response, IPR2018-00226, Paper 23 at 57, see also IPR2018-00234, Paper 18 at 61,
`IPR2018-00401, Paper 15 at 45. Ex. 2055.
`
`IPR2018-00226, -00234, -00410 RPI / Privy PO Demonstrative, 22
`
`
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`At Least Dell Is A Real Party-In-Interest and Privy To Cavium
`
`Alacritech’s District Complaint against Dell Ex. 1416
`
`IPR2018-00226, -00234, -00410 RPI / Privy PO Demonstrative, 23
`
`
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`At Least Dell Is A Real Party-In-Interest and Privy To Cavium
`
`Cavium’s Declaratory Judgment Complaint in Intervention.
`
`IPR2018-00226, -00234, -00410 RPI / Privy PO Demonstrative, 24
`
`
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`Board’s RPI/Privy Discovery Order
`
`• Discovery order compelled
`production of documents
`related to admitted indemnity
`and defense relationships
`
`• Petitioners failed to produce
`documents and/or improperly
`claim common interest and/or
`work product protections over
`arms-length non-privileged and
`non-work product discussions
`
`Board’s RPI/Privy Discovery Order, IPR2018-
`00226, Paper 36, see also IPR2018-00234,
`Paper 31, IPR2018-00401, Paper 24.
`
`IPR2018-00226, -00234, -00410 RPI / Privy PO Demonstrative, 25
`
`
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`Board’s RPI/Privy Discovery Order
`
`Board’s RPI/Privy Discovery Order, IPR2018-00226, Paper 36 at 12-13, see also IPR2018-00234, Paper
`31 at 12-13, IPR2018-00401, Paper 24 at 12-13.
`
`IPR2018-00226, -00234, -00410 RPI / Privy PO Demonstrative, 26
`
`
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`Board’s RPI/Privy Discovery Order
`
`Ex. 2400 at 1
`
`IPR2018-00226, -00234, -00410 RPI / Privy PO Demonstrative, 27
`
`
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`Board’s RPI/Privy Discovery Order
`
`Ex. 2400 at 1
`
`IPR2018-00226, -00234, -00410 RPI / Privy PO Demonstrative, 28
`
`
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`Board’s RPI/Privy Discovery Order
`
`Ex. 2400 at 2
`
`IPR2018-00226, -00234, -00410 RPI / Privy PO Demonstrative, 29
`
`
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`Board’s RPI/Privy Discovery Order
`
`Ex. 2400 at 2
`
`IPR2018-00226, -00234, -00410 RPI / Privy PO Demonstrative, 30
`
`
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`Petitioners Admit RPI/Privy Evidence Exists
`
`Board’s RPI/Privy Discovery Order, IPR2018-00226, Paper 36 at 11, see also IPR2018-00234, Paper 31
`at 11, IPR2018-00401, Paper 24 at 10-11.
`
`IPR2018-00226, -00234, -00410 RPI / Privy PO Demonstrative, 31
`
`
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`Petitioners Admit RPI/Privy Evidence Exists
`
`Board’s RPI/Privy Discovery Order, IPR2018-00226, Paper 36 at 10, see also IPR2018-00234, Paper 31
`at 10, IPR2018-00401, Paper 24 at 10.
`
`IPR2018-00226, -00234, -00410 RPI / Privy PO Demonstrative, 32
`
`
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`Evaluating Real Party-In-Interest and Privy
`
`“Thus, when it comes to evaluating the relationship between a
`party bringing a suit and a non-party, the common law seeks to
`ascertain who, from a ‘practical and equitable’ standpoint, will
`benefit from the redress that the chosen tribunal might provide.
`See Trial Practice Guide, 77 Fed. Reg. at 48,759. Indeed, the PTO
`correctly recognizes that the related concept of privity ‘is an
`equitable rule that takes into account the “practical situation,”
`and should extend to parties to transactions and other activities
`relating to the property in question.’ Id. (citing 157 Cong. Rec.
`S1376 (Mar. 8, 2011) (statement of Sen. Kyl) ).”
`
`Applications in Internet Time, LLC v. RPX Corp., 897 F.3d 1336, 1349 (Fed. Cir., July 9, 2018)
`
`IPR2018-00226, -00234, -00410 RPI / Privy PO Demonstrative, 33
`
`
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`6/30/2016 Alacritech Filed the Complaint Against Dell
`
`10/31/2016 Intel Filed Its Motion to Intervene
`
`Exs. 2501, 2051, 2058
`
`IPR2018-00226, -00234, -00410 RPI / Privy PO Demonstrative, 34
`
`
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`IPR2018-00226, -00234, -00410 RPI / Privy PO Demonstrative, 35
`
`
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`IPR2018-00226, -00234, -00410 RPI / Privy PO Demonstrative, 36
`
`
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`Cavium Privilege Log Relating to Court Litigation
`
`6/30/2016 Alacritech Filed the Complaint Against Dell
`
`10/31/2016 Intel Filed Its Motion to Intervene
`
`1/13/2017 Cavium Filed Its Motion to Intervene
`
`Exs. 1454, 2051, 2055
`
`IPR2018-00226, -00234, -00410 RPI / Privy PO Demonstrative, 37
`
`
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`Cavium Claims Comment Interest With Dell
`
`Ex. 1454
`
`IPR2018-00226, -00234, -00410 RPI / Privy PO Demonstrative, 38
`
`
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`Cavium’s Harnois Declaration Is Bare Attorney Argument
`
`Ex. 1500 at 1-2.
`
`IPR2018-00226, -00234, -00410 RPI / Privy PO Demonstrative, 39
`
`