throbber

`
`Filed: January 4, 2018
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`______________________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`______________________
`
`INTEL CORP., and CAVIUM, INC.
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`ALACRITECH, INC.,
`Patent Owner.
`______________________
`
`Case IPR2018-002341
`U.S. Patent No. 8,805,948
`______________________
`
`PETITIONER’S RESPONSES TO PATENT OWNER’S
`REQUESTS FOR ADDITIONAL DISCOVERY
`
`
`
` 1
`
` Cavium, Inc., which filed a Petition in Case IPR2018-00403, has been joined as a
`
`petitioner in this proceeding.
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case IPR2018-00234
`U.S. Patent No. 8,805,948
`Petitioner Intel Corporation (“Petitioner”) responds to Patent Owner’s
`
`requests for production as follows:
`
`I.
`
`GENERAL OBJECTIONS
`
`1.
`
`Petitioner objects to Patent Owner’s requests to the extent that the
`
`requests impose requirements that are broader than, or inconsistent with the
`
`requirements set forth in the Office Patent Trial Practice Guide.
`
`2.
`
`Petitioner objects to Patent Owner’s requests to the extent they request
`
`information, including confidential or proprietary business information of Petitioner,
`
`which is not relevant to the issue of whether Dell, Wistron, or CenturyLink are real
`
`party in interests to this IPR or in privity with Petitioner.
`
`3.
`
`Petitioner objects to the requests to the extent they request information
`
`protected as work product, attorney client privilege, common interest privilege,
`
`and/or any other applicable privilege, prohibition, limitation or immunity from
`
`disclosure.
`
`4.
`
`Petitioner objects to the requests to the extent that they are vague,
`
`overly broad, unduly burdensome, and seek duplicative information.
`
`II. REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS AND THINGS
`
`Subject to the General Objections above, Petitioners respond as follows:
`
`
`
`1
`
`

`

`Case IPR2018-00234
`U.S. Patent No. 8,805,948
`
`Request for Production No. 1
`Documents and Communications relating to the indemnification and defense
`
`obligations, rights and interests between Intel and Dell, Intel and Wistron, Intel and
`
`CenturyLink, and Cavium and Dell relating to Alacritech’s patents asserted at
`
`anytime in the in the District Court Cases (including documents giving rise to such
`
`indemnification obligations, documents tendering and documents memorializing the
`
`nature and scope of the agreements).
`
`Response to Request for Production No. 1
`Petitioner objects to this request as vague, ambiguous, and overly broad.
`
`Petitioner further objects that this request seeks information that is not relevant to
`
`any issue in this IPR.
`
`Subject to and without waiving its general and specific objections, and to the
`
`extent this request can be reasonably understood, Petitioner will conduct a
`
`reasonable search for documents and communications and produce non-privileged,
`
`responsive documents and communications between Petitioner and Dell, Wistron or
`
`CenturyLink related to Petitioner’s indemnification and defense obligations to Dell,
`
`Wistron or CenturyLink relating to Alacritech’s patents asserted in the District Court
`
`cases, if any exist.
`
`Request for Production No. 2
`Documents and Communications relating to any representations or warranties
`
`made by Intel or Cavium to the Putative Real Parties in Interest about indemnity and
`2
`
`
`
`

`

`Case IPR2018-00234
`U.S. Patent No. 8,805,948
`defense obligations, rights and interests relating to Alacritech’s patents asserted at
`
`anytime in the in the District Court Cases.
`
`Response to Request for Production No. 2
`Petitioner objects to this request as vague, ambiguous, and overly broad.
`
`Petitioner further objects that this request seeks information that is not relevant to
`
`any issue in this IPR.
`
`Subject to and without waiving its general and specific objections, and to the
`
`extent this request can be reasonably understood, Petitioner will conduct a
`
`reasonable search for documents and communications and produce non-privileged,
`
`responsive documents and communications between Petitioner and Dell, Wistron or
`
`CenturyLink related to Petitioner’s indemnification and defense obligations to Dell,
`
`Wistron or CenturyLink relating to Alacritech’s patents asserted in the District Court
`
`cases, if any exist.
`
` Request for Production No. 3
`Documents and Communications between Petitioners and the Putative Real
`
`Parties in Interest concerning the consideration and decision to prepare, review, or
`
`file any IPR petition against Alacritech’s patents asserted at anytime in the District
`
`Court Cases.
`
`
`
`3
`
`

`

`Case IPR2018-00234
`U.S. Patent No. 8,805,948
`
`Response to Request for Production No. 3
`Petitioner objects to this request as vague, ambiguous, and overly broad.
`
`Petitioner further objects that this request seeks information that is not relevant to
`
`any issue in this IPR.
`
`Subject to and without waiving its general and specific objections, and to the
`
`extent this request can be reasonably understood, Petitioner will conduct a
`
`reasonable search for documents and produce non-privileged, responsive documents
`
`concerning the consideration and decision to prepare, review, or file any IPR petition
`
`against Alacritech’s patents asserted in the District Court cases, if any exist.
`
`Request for Production No. 4
`Documents memorializing the relationship(s) between Petitioners and the
`
`Putative Real Parties in Interest, including indemnity and defense agreements, and
`
`any participation in Board membership, ownership interests, agency designations,
`
`legal representations, and/or financial investments if any exist.
`
`Response to Request for Production No. 4
`Petitioner objects to this request as vague, ambiguous, and overly broad.
`
`Petitioner further objects that this request seeks information that is not relevant to
`
`any issue in this IPR. The PTAB has clarified that this request is limited to
`
`documents that relate to Alacritech’s patents, to these proceedings, or to the
`
`indemnification or defense agreements having relevance to Alacritech’s patents or
`
`to these proceedings if any exist.
`
`
`
`4
`
`

`

`Case IPR2018-00234
`U.S. Patent No. 8,805,948
`Subject to and without waiving its general and specific objections, and to the
`
`extent this request can be reasonably understood, Petitioner will conduct a
`
`reasonable search for documents and produce non-privileged, responsive documents
`
`memorializing the relationship between Petitioner and Dell, Wistron or CenturyLink
`
`related to Alacritech’s patents, to these proceedings, or to the indemnification or
`
`defense agreements having relevance to Alacritech’s patents or to these proceedings,
`
`if any exist.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`5
`
`

`

`Dated: January 4, 2018
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case IPR2018-00234
`U.S. Patent No. 8,805,948
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`/s/ Garland T. Stephens
`Garland T. Stephens, Reg. No. 37,242
`Justin L. Constant, Reg. No. 66,883
`Melissa Hotze, Reg. No. 55,279
`Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP
`700 Louisiana, Suite 1700
`Houston, TX 77002
`Tel: (713) 546-5000
`Fax: (713) 224-9511
`garland.stephens@weil.com
`justin.constant@weil.com
`melissa.hotze@weil.com
`
`Anne M. Cappella, Reg. No. 43,217
`Adrian Percer, Reg. No. 46,986
`Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP
`201 Redwood Shores Parkway
`Redwood Shores, CA 94065
`Tel: (650) 802-3141
`Fax: (650) 802-3100
`anne.cappella@weil.com
`adrian.percer@weil.com
`
`William S. Ansley, Reg. No. 67,828
`Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP
`2001 M Street, N.W, Suite 600
`Washington, DC 20036
`Tel: (202) 682-7000
`Fax: (202) 857-0940
`sutton.ansley@weil.com
`
`Attorneys for Petitioner Intel Corporation
`
`
`
`
`6
`
`

`

`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`I hereby certify that on January 4, 2018, a copy of PETITIONER’S
`
`RESPONSES TO PATENT OWNER’S REQUESTS FOR ADDITIONAL
`
`DISCOVERY was served by delivering a copy via electronic mail upon the
`
`following:
`
`James M. Glass
`Registration No. 46,729
`Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan LLP
`51 Madison Ave., 22nd Fl.
`New York, NY 10010
`Tel.: (212) 849-7000
`Email: jimglass@quinnemanuel.com
`
`Joseph M. Paunovich
`Registration No. 59,033
`Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan LLP
`865 S. Figueroa Street, 10th Fl.
`Los Angeles, CA 90017
`Tel.: (213) 443-3000
`Email: joepaunovich@quinnemanuel.com
`
`Brian E. Mack
`Registration No. 57,189
`Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan LLP
`50 California Street, 22nd Fl.
`San Francisco, CA 94111
`Tel.: (415) 875-6600
`Email: brianmack@quinnemanuel.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Mark Lauer
`Registration No. 36,578
`Silicon Edge Law Group LLP
`7901 Stoneridge Dr., Ste. 528
`Pleasanton, CA 94588
`Tel.: (925) 621-2121
`Email: mark@siliconedgelaw.com
`
`
`
`Dated: January 4, 2019
`
`/s/ Garland T. Stephens
`Garland T. Stephens
`Reg. No. 37,242
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket