throbber
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`______________________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`______________________
`
`INTEL CORP., CAVIUM, LLC, and DELL INC.,
`Petitioners,
`
`v.
`
`ALACRITECH, INC.,
`Patent Owner.
`______________________
`
`Case IPR2018-002261
`U.S. Patent No. 7,124,205
`______________________
`
`
`PETITIONER’S MOTION TO SEAL
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1 Cavium, LLC (formerly Cavium, Inc.) which filed a Petition in Case IPR2018-
`
`00400, and Dell Inc., which filed a Petition in Case IPR2018-01306, have been
`
`joined as petitioners in this proceeding.
`
`
`
`

`

`Case IPR2018-00226
`U.S. Patent No. 7,124,205
`
`
`
`Petitioner Intel Corporation (“Petitioner”) hereby moves to seal certain
`
`portions of Petitioner Intel’s demonstrative exhibits that reference highly
`
`confidential information of the Petitioner. Good cause exists for granting this motion
`
`because Petitioner Intel’s demonstrative exhibits include highly confidential
`
`information.
`
`I. MOTION TO SEAL
`
`The record of an inter partes review proceeding, including documents and
`
`things, is made available to the public, except as otherwise ordered. 37 C.F.R.
`
`§ 2.14. But despite the default rule of public availability, the Board will seal
`
`confidential information for “good cause,” because it is necessary to “strike a
`
`balance between the public’s interest in maintaining a complete and understandable
`
`file history and the parties’ interest in protecting truly sensitive information.” 37
`
`C.F.R. § 42.54(a); 77 Fed. Reg. 48756, 48760 (Aug. 14, 2012). As set forth in the
`
`Office Trial Practice Guide, the Board treats confidential information “consistent
`
`with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c)(1)(G), which provides for protective
`
`orders for trade secret or other confidential research, development, or commercial
`
`information.” Id. at 48760.
`
`In accordance with rules and procedures, Petitioner moves to seal portions of
`
`its demonstrative exhibits, specifically portions of demonstrative exhibits 201, 202,
`
`203, 210, 211, 219, 235, 238, 241, 250, 254, 255.
`
`2
`
`

`

`Case IPR2018-00226
`U.S. Patent No. 7,124,205
`
`
`
`Petitioner Intel’s demonstrative exhibits are redacted to protect highly
`
`sensitive, commercial information related to the relationship between Intel and its
`
`customers and other internal Intel business practices. As such, portions of the
`
`demonstrative exhibits are designated Petitioner’s Restricted – Attorneys’ Eyes Only
`
`under the Protective Order in this IPR.
`
`Because Petitioner Intel’s demonstrative exhibits contains certain confidential
`
`business information as indicated above, the public disclosure of which could cause
`
`Petitioner irreparable harm, good cause exists to seal portions of demonstrative
`
`exhibits as Petitioner’s Restricted – Attorneys’ Eyes Only information under the
`
`Protective Order. In addition, the information that Petitioner requests to be sealed
`
`has been submitted only to rebut Patent Owner’s arguments regarding real party in
`
`interest. The information is otherwise unimportant to the merits of this proceeding,
`
`and therefore the public’s interest in having access to this information is minimal.
`
`II. CERTIFICATION OF NON-PUBLICATION
`
`On behalf of Petitioner, the undersigned counsel certifies that the information
`
`sought to be sealed by this Motion has not, to their knowledge, been published or
`
`otherwise made public.
`
`3
`
`

`

`Case IPR2018-00226
`U.S. Patent No. 7,124,205
`
`
`III. CONCLUSION
`
`For the foregoing reasons, Petitioner respectfully requests that the Board grant
`
`the motion to seal certain portions of Petitioner Intel’s demonstrative exhibits that
`
`reference highly confidential information of the Petitioner.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`4
`
`

`

`Dated: February 27, 2019
`
`
`
`
`
`Case IPR2018-00226
`U.S. Patent No. 7,124,205
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`/s/ Garland T. Stephens
`Garland T. Stephens, Reg. No. 37,242
`Melissa L. Hotze, Reg. No. 55,279
`Justin L. Constant, Reg. No. 66,883
`Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP
`700 Louisiana, Suite 1700
`Houston, TX 77002
`Tel: (713) 546-5000
`Fax: (713) 224-9511
`garland.stephens@weil.com
`melissa.hotze@weil.com
`justin.constant@weil.com
`
`Anne M. Cappella, Reg. No. 43,217
`Adrian Percer, Reg. No. 46,986
`Amanda Branch (admitted pro hac vice)
`Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP
`201 Redwood Shores Parkway
`Redwood Shores, CA 94065
`Tel: (650) 802-3000
`Fax: (650) 802-3100
`anne.cappella@weil.com
`adrian.percer@weil.com
`amanda.branch@weil.com
`
`William S. Ansley, Reg. No. 67,828
`Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP
`2001 M Street, N.W, Suite 600
`Washington, DC 20036
`Tel: (202) 682-7000
`Fax: (202) 857-0940
`sutton.ansley@weil.com
`
`Attorneys for Petitioner Intel Corporation
`
`5
`
`

`

`Case IPR2018-00226
`U.S. Patent No. 7,124,205
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`I hereby certify that on February 27, 2019, a copy of PETITIONER’S
`
`MOTION TO SEAL was served by filing this document through the PTAB’s E2E
`
`Filing System as well as delivering a copy via electronic mail upon the following:
`
`James M. Glass
`Registration No. 46,729
`Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan LLP
`51 Madison Ave., 22nd Fl.
`New York, NY 10010
`Tel.: (212) 849-7000
`Email: jimglass@quinnemanuel.com
`
`Joseph M. Paunovich
`Registration No. 59,033
`Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan LLP
`865 S. Figueroa Street, 10th Fl.
`Los Angeles, CA 90017
`Tel.: (213) 443-3000
`Email: joepaunovich@quinnemanuel.com
`
`Brian E. Mack
`Registration No. 57,189
`Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan LLP
`50 California Street, 22nd Fl.
`San Francisco, CA 94111
`Tel.: (415) 875-6600
`Email: brianmack@quinnemanuel.com
`
`
`
`Dated: February 27, 2019
`
`
`
`/s/ Melissa L. Hotze
`Melissa L. Hotze
`Reg. No. 55,279
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket