throbber

`
`Cluidtlnduir',r
`
`Quick Enquiry
`
`Marne *
`
`Phone i
`
`Email *
`
`message *
`
`ifi piease add me to Unified Patents mailing list.
`
`Submit I
`*These fields are required.
`E e-es'drce CECE-.5
`
`FRO
`
`Read Stanford Law's May 2014
`guideto alternative patent
`licensing
`
`COMPARE UNIFIED PATENTS TO OTHER
`
`OPTIONS
`
`0 Download PDF
`
`LEARN HOWr WE RATE AND MAKE YOUR OWN
`
`CONCLUSIONS
`
`FREOLJENTLV
`
`LATEST DATA
`
`RESPOND TO SUPPORT FOR
`
`ASKED
`
`8: TRENDS
`
`QUESTIONS
`
`STARTUPS NPETHREAT
`@inmatv-
`
`Unified v. Uniloc,
`IPR2018-00199
`Uniloc's Exhibit No. 2004
`
`

`

`WHAT WE DO
`
`Unified addresses the risk and cost of HPE litigation by strategically protecting broad areas of technology, such as cloud
`storage or content delivery. Unified's unique solution partners large companies, Slles and startups to proactively deter NFE
`activity. The resources that we use include monitoring, market intelligence, claims analysis and USPTE] challenges.
`Ely protecting important areas technology, or Eones, Unified mitigates NPE risk for its memhers' most important products
`and services.
`
`Disrupt
`
`Decrease
`
`NEWS/BLDG
`
`Since 2011, PersonalWetr {www.perso...
`
`APRIL 2014 LIGITATIDN
`
`UNIFIED PATENTS SPRING
`
`UNIFIED PATENTS FILES TO
`
`REPORT
`
`2014 NEWSLETTER
`
`INVALIDATE PERSONALWEB'S
`
`PATENT I...
`
`Edi-1 TDTAL PATENT LAWSUITS FILED IN US
`
`Unified Patents is pleased to report that we have
`
`Unified has been monrtoring Personal‘i‘u'eo's
`
`DISTRICT COURT
`
`achieved some significant milestones. We are
`
`activity in the cloud storage space for some time
`
`T I 3 lawsuits by MPEs against SMEs this month
`
`excited to tie protecting new technology areas as
`_
`our membership grows and our de...
`
`as part of our continued efforts to deter NPEs.
`_
`
`ABOUT US
`
`COMPANYOVERVEWI
`
`qusrdecl:
`
`Funding:
`
`.131. 2
`
`‘r’early Sulascrrot'cn Fees
`
`Current Su'oscrioers:
`
`50+ cc-n‘ c-anies ranging from sta “toe-s to
`
`$ED+ pill'on co-pcratiocs
`
`MANAGEMENT
`
`fin Kevin Jakel
`cso
`
`serin has ITCI'E' tran twelve years of inteiiettual orooerty
`e;-:perie:‘.ce as fn-hocse and octcide -cocnse._ rouch cf i: spent
`defending teccnclcgy compares from ates-{s oy I‘lPEs. Most
`recently, fies-in served as Intc't's Head cf P Litigaticn. Pricr to
`Intuit. Kevin was a patent Iztigator with says Scooter L_F' acd
`.—Icvrrey L_P wcere he represents: clients 'o varicur :echno ogy
`areas. He deg-an his career as a sates? examnerat ice LS.
`Patent s Trademark Office. Revin “as a JD from Secrge
`t-vashingtcn Jot-i'e'sity _av.-' School an: a BB in Iv’echa. ical
`Engineering from UCLA”
`
`m Shawn amlowani
`CED
`
`Show -'n is responsible for refining deflects doe-rations.
`ri‘rnmlfiorehin |'.'—'I"‘|'| Iifmord' snarl works-For!
`2 1'. Pin:- mash—chant
`
`

`

`
`
`CONTACT US
`
`h Latest Tweets
`
`E Ask a Quick Question
`
`sniiiedeetents @netests si es asleed there is e ierger
`gran-lent. But detening esseltiens of Int-and patents is a
`gee: ste rt.
`
`.
`_
`.
`.
`'Jliifietleetents |.1-'.'I"."d fininistee D'n'Ei'M'i-il of Inter Panes
`F E'r'if'w |:I;.- rgit-etiiins CI": iELLF nttps:.-'.-'1 ens-135mm EB
`
`’ er'iiiedpatents :gtpetentseies IFFis improve |1stefitt|uaI-t',-.
`i'l'et is i_1-:-eri fE-l
`ii1E'u'H'IE-I11F'. system
`
`Name
`
`Email
`
`IZtlueryir
`
`please add me to Unified
`Patents mailing list.
`
`Submit
`
`9 Mailing Address
`
`171 Main St.#TCiEr
`
`LDS ALTOS CA 94622
`
`United States
`
`+1.415.?BE.5CIDT
`
`infe@unifiedpatents .eem
`
`'9 201 3 Unified Patents, inc. All Rights resewed.
`
`’ f 5' av
`
`
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket