throbber
.
`
`IIIIIII III IIflIII
`IIIIIII III
`||||
`IIIIIIII
`lIIIIllllIII|8I||IIIIIIIII“I
`I*52
`320*
`
`|| |||||||
`
`*A*
`
`5228320
`
`A
`
`Menostar (Berlex) 06/08/2004 Approval [PostmenOpausal
`Osteoporosis]: Approval Letter; Final Labeling
`
`This document was provided by:
`
`FOI Services, Inc
`704 Quince Orchard Road - Suite 275
`
`Gaithersburg MD 20878-1751 USA
`Phone:
`301 -975-9400
`Fax:
`301-975—0702
`
`Email:
`
`infofoi@foiservices.com
`
`Do you need additional U.S. Government information?
`
`Since 1975. FOI Services. lnc has specialized in acquiring government files using the Freedom of information Act.
`We have millions of pages of unpublished documentation already on file and available for immediate delivery.
`
`Many of the documents you need are available for immediate downloading at:
`www. foiservices. com
`
`any of the information in these documents; the documents will be faithful copies of the information supplied to FOl Services. Inc.
`
`Unless specified otherwise. all of FOI Services' documents have been released by the us. Government under the provisions of the
`Freedom of Information Act and are therefore available to the general public. FOI Services. Inc. does not guarantee the accuracy of
`
` 
`
 
`
`
`MYLAN - EXHIBIT 1017
`
`0001
`
`

`

`CENTER FOR DRUG EVALUATION AND RESEARCH
`
`Approval Package for:
`
`APPLICA TION NUMBER:
`
`2 1-674
`
`Trade Name:
`
`Menostar
`
`Generic Name:
`
`Sponsor:
`
`Berlex Laboratories
`
`Approval Date: . June 8, 2004
`
`Indications:
`
`Provides for the 'use of Menostar for the prevention of
`postmenopausal osteoporosis
`
`
`
`0002
`
`

`

`CENTER FOR DRUG EVALUATION AND
`RESEARCH
`
`APPLICA TION NUMBER:
`
`2 1 -674
`
`CONTENTS
`
`
`
`Reviews / Information Included in thlS NAD Review.
`
`
`
`A roval Letter
`A. '. rovable Letter 1
`A rovable Letter 2
`Final Printed Labelin_
`
`Medical Review 5
`
`Chemistr Review s
`
`EA/FONSI
`
`fl_ _
`_________
`X
`
`__I_=X
`
`
`
`0003
`
`

`

`CENTER FOR DRUG EVALUATION AND
`
`RESEARCH
`
`APPLICA TION NUMBER:
`
`2 1 -674
`
`APPROVAL LETTER
`
`
`
`0004
`
`

`

`L“ 5!lug-L
`
`5'
`.
`= C DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES
`
`a.“
`
`Public Health Service
`
`Food and Drug Administration
`Rockvillo, MD 20857
`
`NDA 2l-674
`
`Berlex Laboratories Inc.
`
`Attention: Geoffrey Millington
`Manager, Drug Regulatory Affairs
`340 Changebridge Road; PO. Box 1000
`Montville, NJ 07045-1000
`
`Dear Mr. Millington:
`
`Please refer to your new drug application (NDA) dated August 7, 2003, received August 8, 2003,
`submitted under section 505b of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act for Menostar (estradiol
`transdermal system).
`
`We acknowledge receipt of your submissions dated October 7, November 14, December 17, 2003 and
`March 15, May 4, 12, 14, and June 2, and 8 (2 submissions), 2004.
`
`This new drug application provides for the use of Menostar (cstradiol transdermal system) for prevention
`of postmenopausal osteoporosis.
`
`We have completed our review of this application and it is approved, effective on the date of this letter,
`for use as recommended in the agreed—upon labeling text and with the minor editorial changes to the foil
`pouches, containers and cartons listed below. The changes to the foil pouches mustbe implemented
`before manufacture of batch no. 2.
`
`General Revisions to foil pouches, containers and cartons:
`
`1. Relocate the graphic that covers the beginning letter ‘M‘_ of the proprietary name so that it does
`not interfere with the readability of the proprietary name.
`
`2.
`
`Increasethe prominence of the established name and strength, so that they are at least one-half
`the size of the proprietary name.
`
`3. Eliminate the terminal Zeros listed throughout the container labels and carton labeling since they
`could be misinterpreted (e.g., 1.0 as 10).
`
`Specific Revision to the foil pouches (sample and trade):
`
`1.
`
`Include the route of administration on the principal display panel (e.g., For Transdermal Use).
`
`
`
`0005
`
`

`

`NDA 21-674
`
`Page 2
`
`Specific Revisions to Menostar Carton Labeling (4 systems, .6 x 4 systems, sample card):
`
`1.
`
`Increase the prominence of the route of administration statement on the principal display panel.
`
`2. Revise the net quantity statement to read ‘4 Transdermal Systems‘, ‘6 Patient Packs each
`containing ‘4 Transdermal Systems’ or ‘1 Transdermal System’, as appropriate.
`
`The final printed labeling (FPL) must be identical to the enclosed labeling for the package insert and the
`patient package insert and include the minor editorial revisions to the submitted labeling (foil pouch,
`containers and cartons, submitted May 14, 2004). We remind you of your agreement to make the
`labeling changes to the foil pouches before production of batch no. 2. These changes can be submitted
`as a CBE-O labeling supplement, which must contain final printed labeling.
`
`These revisions are terms of the NDA approval. Marketing the product before making the revisions,
`exactly as stated, in the product’s labeling may render the product misbranded and an unapproved new
`drug.
`
`The electronic labeling rule published December 11, 2003, (68 FR 69009) requires submission of
`labeling content in electronic format effective June 8, 2004. For additional information, consult the
`following guidances for industry regarding electronic submissions: Providing Regulatory Submissions in
`Electronic Format — NDAs (January, 1999) and drafi guidance Providing Regulatory Submissions in
`Electronic Format - Content ofLabeling ((February 2004). The guidances specify labeling to be
`submitted in pdfformat. To assist in our review, we request that labeling also be submitted in MS Word
`format. If formatted copies of all labeling pieces (i.e., package insert, patient package insert, container
`labels, and carton labels) are submitted electronically, labeling does not need to be submitted in paper.
`For administrative purposes, designate this submission “FPL for approved NDA 21-674.” Approval of
`this submission by FDA is not required before the labeling is used.
`
`All applications for new active ingredients, new dosage forms, new indications, new routes of
`administration, and new dosing regimens are required to contain an assessment of the safety and
`effectiveness of the product in pediatric patients unless this requirement is waived or deferred. We are
`waiving the pediatric study requirement for this application.
`
`In addition, submit three copies of the introductory promotional materials that you propose to use for this
`product. Submit all proposed materials in draft or mock-up form, not final print. Send one copy to this
`division and two copies of both the promotional materials and the package insert directly to:
`
`Division of Drug Marketing, Advertising,
`and Communications, RFD-42
`Food and Drug Administration
`5600 Fishers Lane
`
`Rockville, MD 20857
`
`Werernind you that you must comply with reporting requirements for an approved NDA (21 CFR
`314.80 and 314.81).
`
`
`
`0006
`
`

`

`NDA 21—674
`
`Page 3
`
`All 15-day alert reports, periodic (including quarterly) adverse drug experience reports, field
`alerts, annual reports, supplements, and other submissions should be addressed to the original
`NDA 20-375 for this drug product, not to this NDA. In the future, do not make submissions to
`this NDA except for the final printed labeling requested above.
`
`If you have any questions, call Pat Madara, Regulatory Project Manager, at (301) 827-6416.
`
`Sincerely,
`
`{See appended electronic signature page}
`
`David G. Orloff, MD.
`Director
`
`Division of Metabolic and Endocrine Drug Products
`Office of Drug Evaluation 11
`Center for Drug Evaluation and Research
`
`Enclosure:
`
`package insert
`patient package insert
`
`
`
`0007
`
`

`

`CENTER FOR DRUG EVALUATION AND
`
`RESEARCH
`
`APPLICA TION NUMBER:
`
`21-674
`
`APPROVED LABELING
`
`
`
`0008
`
`

`

`Rx only
`Menostar'rM gestradiol transdermal gstem)
`PRESCRIBING INFORMATION
`
`
`ESTROGENS INCREASE THE RISK OF ENDOMETRIAL CANCER
`
`
`
`
`_
`
`Close" clinical surveillance of all women taking estrogens is important. Adequate
`diagnostic measures, including endometrial sampling when indicated, should be
`undertaken to rule out malignancy in all cases of undiagnosed persistent or recurring
`abnormal vaginal bleeding. There is no evidence that the use of “natural” estrogens
`results in a different endometrial risk profile than synthetic estrogens at equivalent
`estrogen doses. (See WARNINGS, Malignant neoplasms, Endometrial cancer.)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`CARDIOVASCULAR AND OTHER RISKS
`
`Estrogens with and without progestins should not be used for the prevention of
`cardiovascular disease. (See WARNINGS, Cardiovascular disorders.)
`
`The Women’s Health Initiative (WI-II) study reported increased risks of myocardial
`infarction, stroke, invasive breast cancer, pulmonary emboli, and deep vein thrombosis in
`postmenopausal women (50 to 79 years of age) during 5 years of treatment with oral
`conjugated estrogens (CE 0.625mg) combined with medroxyprogesterone acetate (MFA
`2.5mg) relative to placebo (see CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, Clinical Studies.)
`
`The Women‘s Health Initiative Memory Study (WHIMS), a substudy of WHI, reported
`increased risk of developing probable dementia in pestmenopausal women 65 years of
`age or older during 4 years of treatment with oral conjugated estrogens plus
`medroxyprogesterone acetate relative to placebo. It is unknown whether this finding
`applies to younger postmenopausal women or to women taking estrogen alone therapy.
`(See CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, Clinical Studies.)
`
`
`
`
`
`Other doses of oral conjugated estrogens with medroxyprogesterone acetate, and other
`combinations and dosage forms of estrogens and progestins were not studied in the Will
`clinical trials and, in the absence of comparable data, these risks should be assumed to be
`similar. Because of these risks, estrogens with or without progestins should be prescribed
`at the lowest effective doses and for the shortest duration consistent with treatment goals
`and risks for the individual woman.
`'
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`0009
`
`

`

`DESCRIPTION
`
`MenostarTM, estradiol transdermal system, is designed to provide nominal in viva delivery
`of 14 meg HIS—estradiol per day continuously upon application to intact skin. The period
`of use is 7 days. The transdcrmal system has a contact surface area of 3.25 cm2, and
`contains 1.0 mg of estradiol USP.
`
`Estradiol USP (NB-estradiol) is a white, crystalline powder, chemically described as
`estra-1,3,S(10)-triene—3, ITB-diol.
`It has an empirical formula of C13 H24 02 and
`molecular weight of 272.39. The structural formula is:
`
`
`
`The MenostarTM transdermal system comprises three layers. Proceeding from the visible
`surface toward the surface attached to the skin, these layers are (1) a translucent
`polyethylene film, and (2) an acrylate adhesive matrix containing estradiol USP. A
`protective liner (3) of siliconized or fluoropolymer—coated poiyester film is attached to
`the adhesive surface and must be removed before the transdermal system can be used.
`
`(15mm Backing
`% a WWW Law
`
`nwmmMumm
`
`The active component ofthe transdermal system is FIB—estradiol. The remaining
`components of the transdennal system (acrylate copolymer adhesive, fatty acid esters,
`and polyethylene backing) are pharmacologically inactive.
`
`CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY
`
`The Ivlenostar'l'M transdermai system provides systemic estrogen therapy by releasing
`WEI-estradiol, the major estrogenic hormone secreted by the human ovary.
`_
`
`Endogenous estrogens are largely responsible for the development and maintenance of
`' the female reproductive system and secondary sexual characteristics. Although
`circulating estrogens exist in a dynamic equilibrium of metabolic interconversions,
`estradiol is the principal intracellular human estrogen and is substantially more potent
`than its metabolites, estrone and estriol,'at the reCeptor level.
`
`
`
`0010
`
`

`

`The primary source of estrogen in normally cycling adult women is the ovarian follicle,
`which secretes 70 to 500 mcg of estradiol daily, depending on the phase of the menstrual
`cycle. After menopause, most endogenous estrogen is produced by conversion of
`androstenedione, secreted by the adrenal cortex, to estrone by peripheral tissues. Thus,
`estrone and the sulfate conjugated form, estrone sulfate, are the most abundant circulating
`estrogens in postmenopausal women.
`
`Estrogcns act through binding to nuclear receptors in estrogen-responsive tissues. To
`date, two estrogen receptors have been identified. These vary in proportion from tissue to
`tissue.
`
`Circulating estrogens modulate the pituitary secretion of the gonadotropins, luteinizing
`hormone (LH) and follicle stimulating hormone (FSH), through a negative feedback
`mechanism. Estrogens act to reduce the elevated levels of these hormones seen in
`postmenopausal women.
`
`The decline of ovarian estrogen production that accompanies menopause or
`oophorectomy results in the acceleration of bone loss and bone resorption. Bone
`resorption is increased more than bone formation especially in the early years of
`menopause where bone loss is the greatest. In some women, these changes will
`eventually lead to decreased bone mass, osteoporosis and increased risk for fractures,
`particularly that of the spine, hip, and wrist. Vertebral fractures are the most common
`type of osteoporotic fracture in postmenopausal women.
`Postmenopausal Women with low serum estradiol concentrations and high serum
`concentrations of sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG) have an increased risk of hip
`and vertebral fractures. Postmenopausal estrogen therapy decreases bone resorption,
`helping to reestablish balance between resorption and formation. This effect appears to be
`effective for as long as treatment is continued.
`
`PHARMACOKINETICS
`
`The bioavailability of estradiol following application of a MenostarTM transdcrmal
`system, relative to that of a transdermal system delivering 25 mcglday, was investigated
`in 18 healthy postmenopausal women mean age 66 years (range 60-80 years). The mean
`serum estradiol concentrations. upon administration of the two patches to the lower
`abdomen are shown in Figure 1. Transdermal administration of Menostar" produced
`geometric mean serum concentration (Cavg) of estradiol of 13.7 pg/mL. No patches
`failed to adhere during the one week application period of both transdennal systems.
`- Following application of the lvienosta.r"l'M ttansdermal system to the abdomen, it is
`estimated to provide an average nominal in-vivo daily delivery of 14 mcg estradiol/day.
`
`Absorption
`The Menostar'l‘M transdermal delivery system continuously releases estradiol which is
`transported across intact skin leading to sustained circulating levels of estradiol during a
`7-day treatment period. The systemic availability of estradiol after transdermal
`
`
`
`0011
`
`

`

`administration is about 20 times higher than that after oral administration. This difference is
`due to the absence of first pass metabolism when estradiol is given by the transdermal route.
`
`Figure 1
`
`Mean Uncorrected Serum 1'7 B—Estradiol Concentrations vs. Time Profile Following
`Application of Menostarm and Climara‘D 6.5 cm2 Transdermal System
`
`TM
`
`Menostar
`o
`
`l4 meg/day
`
`cum” 6. s cm1 25 mayday
`
`12
`
`24
`
`36
`
`48
`
`60
`
`72
`
`84
`
`96 108120132144155168180
`
`Time(h)
`
` 
`
`0012
`
`J E
`
`.._.
`U)
`o.v
`i:
`.9in,
`
`
`
`A.
`
`.3;r:
`a:
`
`ocoO E Ebt
`
`o
`DJ
`E:1I.
`a)
`(D
`
`

`

`Table 1 provides a summary of estradiol phannacokinetic parameters determined during
`evaluation of MenostarTM using baseline uncorrected serum concentratious.
`
`Table 1. Summary or Estradiol Pharmacoldnetic Parameters (Abdomfi Application)
`
`Estradiol
`
`
`
`Daily
`Delivery
`Rate,
`
`meg/day
`
`Pharmacokinetic parameters are expressed in geometeric means except for the tmax which represents the
`median estimate and the Cmin which is expressed as the arithmetic mean.
`
`The estimated estradiol daily delivery rate for Climara® 6.5 cm2 is quoted from the
`Climaram labeling.
`
`Distribution
`
`The distribution of exogenous estrogens is similar to that of endogenous estrogens.
`Estrogens are widely distributed in the body and are generally found in higher
`concentrations in the sex hormone target organs. Estrogens circulate in the blood largely
`bound to sex hormone binding globulin (SHBG) and albumin. In the clinical study with
`208 patients on MenostarT”, SHBG concentration (mean .+. SD) remained essentially
`unchanged over the 2 year period (baseline 45.] :I: 20.1 nmolfL, 24 month visit 46.4 :t
`20.9 nrnol/L).
`
`Metabolism
`
`Exogenous estrogens are metabolized in the same manner as endogenous estrogens.
`Circulating estrogens exist in a dynamic equilibrium of metabolic interconversions.
`These transformations take place mainly in the liver. Estradiol is converted reversibly to
`estrone, and both can be converted to estn'ol, which is the major urinary metabolite.
`Estrogens also undergo cnterohepatic recirculation via sulfate and glucuronide
`conjugation in the liver, biliary secretion of conjugates into the intestine, and hydrolysis
`in the gut followed by reabsorption. In postmenopausal women, a significant proportion
`of the circulating estrogens exist as sulfate conjugates, especially estrone sulfate, which
`serves as a circulating reservoir for the formation of more active estrogens.
`
`Excretion
`
`Estradiol, estrone, and estriol are excreted in the urine along with glucuronide and sulfate
`conjugates.
`
`Special Populations.-
`
` 
`
`0013
`
`

`

`Geriatric: The efficacy and safety of MenostarTM has been studied in women between 60
`and 80 years of age, with approximately half over 65 years old.
`
`Pediatric: No pharmacokinetic study for MenostarTM has been conducted in a pediatric
`population.
`
`Gender: MenostarTM is indicated for use in postmenopausal women only.
`
`Race: No studies were done to determine the effect of race on the pharmacokinetics of
`Menostarm.
`
`Patients with Renal Impairment: Total estradiol serum levels are higher in
`postmenopausal women with end stage renal disease (ESRD) receiving maintenance
`hemodialysis than in normal subjects at baseline and following oral doses of estradiol.
`Therefore, conventional transdermal estradiol doses used in individuals with normal renal
`function may be excessive for postmenopausal women with ESRD receiving maintenance
`hemodialysis.
`
`Patients with Hepatic impairment: Estrogens may be poorly metabolized in patients with
`impaired liver function and should be administered with caution.
`
`Drug Interactions
`In vitro and in vivo studies have shown that estrogens are metabolized partially by
`cytochrome P450 3A4 (CYP3A4). Therefore, inducers or inhibitors of CYP3A4 may
`affect estrogen drug metabolism. Inducers of CYP3A4 such as St. John‘s Wort
`preparations (Hypericum perforatum), phenobarbital, carbamazepine, and rifampin may
`reduce plasma concentrations of estrogens, possibly resulting in a decrease in therapeutic
`effects and/or changes in the uterine bleeding profile. Inhibitors of CYP3A4 such as
`erythromycin, clarithromycin, ketoconazole, itraconazole, ritonavir and grapefruit juice
`may increase plasma concentrations of estrogens and may result in side effects.
`
`Adhesion
`In a Menostar phannacokinetic study with 18 postmenopausal women, no patches failed
`to adhere during the one week application period
`
`Clinical Studies
`
`The efficacy of MenostarTM in the prevention ofpostmenopausal osteoporosis was
`investigated in a 2-year double blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter study in the United
`States. A total of 417 postmenopausal women, 60 to'80 years old, with an intact uterus
`were enrolled in the study. All patients receivedlsupplemental calcium and vitamin D.
`
`MenostarTM produced larger increases in bone mass than placebo as reflected by dual—
`energy x-ray absorptiometric (DEXA) measurements of hip and lumbar spine BMD. The
`changes in BMD from baseline were statistically significantly (p <0.001) greater during
`
` 
`
`0014
`
`

`

`treatment with Menostar'l'M than during treatment with placebo for hip and spine aflcr l
`and 2 years.
`
`At'lumbar Spine MenostarTM increased BMD by 2.3% afier 1 year and 3.0% afler 2 years
`compared with a 0.5% increase after 1 and 2 years of treatment with placebo. At the hip
`N‘ienostarTM increased BMD by 0.90% after one year and 0.84% afier two years
`compared with a mean decrease of 0.22% after 1 year and 0.71% after 2 years of placebo
`treatment (see Table 2 below).
`
`Table 2. Mean PercentABMD Change from Baseline in Lumbar Spine and Total Hip
`(Full Analysis Set)
`
`Lumbar spine
`
`Time points Menostarm Placebo
`N=208|
`N=209
`
`12-month
`
`Endpoint
`
`24-month
`
`'
`
`n = 186
`+0.5 1
`
`n =
`
`+0.54
`
`.
`
`Placebo
`N=209
`
`
`
`Endpoint
`Endpoint
`N = total number of patients; n = number of patients with data available for each variable
`
`
`
`
`
`The BMD data of the study were analyzed according to baseline estradiol levels of the
`patients. Overall, estimated treatment effects on lumbar spine and total hip BMD after 2
`years were approximately twice as large in the subgroup with baseline estradiol levels < S
`pg/mL than in the subgroup with baseline estradiol levels 2 5.0 pg/mL [Table 3].
`
`Table 3. Mean percent change in lumbar spine and total hip BMD at 24 months by subgroups of
`baseline estradiel level (< 5 pglmL, 2 5 pglmL)
`
`I
`
`Lumbar spine
`
`Menostarm
`
`Placebo
`
`Treatment Menostarm
`difference
`
`Total hip
`
`Placebo
`
`Baseline
`estradiol
`levels
`
`+0.81
`
`Treatment
`difference
`
`2.13
`
`(p<0.001)
`
`n=97
`
`+0.29
`
`-n=89
`
`3.21
`
`(p<0.001)'
`
`n = number of patients with data available for each variable
`
`Menostar'l'M therapy also resulted-in consistent, statistically significant suppression of
`bone turnover, as reflected by changes in serum and urine markers of bone formation
`(osteocalcin and bone-specific alkaline phosphatase) and bone resorption
`
` 
`
`0015
`
`

`

`(carboxyterminal telopeptide of type I collagen (ICTP) and the urinary deoxypryridoline/
`creatinine ratio).
`
`Women ’s Health Initiative Studies
`
`The Women’s Health Initiative (WI-II) enrolled a total of 27,000 predominantly healthy
`postmenopausal women to assess the risks and benefits of either the use of 0.625 mg
`conjugated estrogens (CE) per day alone or the use of 0.625 mg conjugated estrogens
`plus 2.5 mg medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) per day compared to placebo in the
`prevention of certain chronic diseases. The primary endpoint was the incidence of
`coronary heart disease (CHD) (nonfatal myocardial infarction and CHD death), with
`invasive breast cancer as the primary adverse outcome studied. A “global index" included
`the earliest occurrence of CHD, invasive breast cancer, stroke, pulmonary embolism
`(PB), endometrial cancer, colorectal cancer, hip fixture, or death due to other cause. The
`study did not evaluate the effects of CE or CEIMPA on menopausal symptoms.
`
`The CE/MPA substudy was stopped early because, according to the predefmed stopping
`rule, the increased risk of breast cancer and cardiovascular events exceeded the specified
`benefits included in the “global index." Results of the CE/MPA substudy, which included
`16,608 women (average age of 63 years, range 50 to 79; 83.9% White, 6.5% Black, 5.5%
`Hispanic), afier an average follow-up of 5.2 years are presented in Table 5 below:
`
`Table 5 RELATIVE AND ABSOLUTE RISK SEEN IN THE CEIMPA SUBSTUDY OF
`
`WHI'
`
`Relative Risk
`
`CB/MPA vs placebo
`at 5.2 Years
`
`(95% CI*)
`
`1.29 (1 .02-l .63)
`1.32 (1.02-1. 72)
`1.13 0.70-1.97
`1.26 1.00-1.59
`1.41 1.07-1.85
`2.13 1.39-3.25
`
`15
`
`1 '
`
`CHI) events
`NonJatal M
`CHD death
`
`Pulmo-
`
`embohsm
`
`events above
`
`' ' v- vein fluombosw'
`
`Vertebral fiacarres '
`
`0.66 0.44-0.98 _
`0.77 0.69-0.86
`
`' adapted from JAMA. 2002; 288:321-333
`5 includes metastatic and non-metastatic breast cancer with the exception of in situ breast cancer
`°_a subset of the events was combined in a "global index", defined as the earliest occurrence of CHD events,
`invasive breast cancer, stroke, pulmonary embolism, endometrial cancer, colorectal cancer, hip fracture, or
`death due to other causes
`I’not included in Global Index.
`* nominal confidence intervals unadjusted for multiple looks and multiple comparisons
`
` 
`
`0016
`
`

`

`For those outcomes included in the “global index,” the absolute excess risks per 10,000
`women-years in the group treated with CE/MPA were 7 more CHD events, 8 more
`strokes, 8 more PBS, and 8 more invasive breast cancers, while absolute risk reductions
`per 10,000 women-years were 6 fewer colorectal cancers and S fewer hip fractures. The
`absolute excess risk of events included in the “global index” was 19 per 10,000 women-
`years. There was no difference between the groups in terms of all-cause mortality. (See
`BOXED WARNINGS, WARNINGS, and PRECAUTIONS.)
`
`Women’s Health Initiative Memory Study
`The Women's Health Initiative Memory Study (WHIMS), a substudy of WHI, enrolled
`4,532 predominantly postmenopausal women 65 years of age and older (47% were age
`65 to 69 years, 35% were 70 to 74 years, and 18% were 75 years of age and older) to
`evaluate the effects of CE/MPA (0.625 mg conjugated estrogens plus 2.5 mg
`medroxyprogesterone acetate) on the incidence of probable dementia (primary outcome)
`compared with placebo.
`
`After an average follow-up of 4 years, 40 women in the estrogen/progestin group (45 per
`10, 000 women-years) and 21 in the placebo group (22 per 10,000 women-years) were
`diagnosed with probable dementia. The relative risk of probable dementia in the hormone
`therapy group was 2.05 (95% CI, 1.21 to 3.48) compared to placebo. Differences between
`groups became apparent in the first year of treatment. It is unknown whether these
`findings apply to younger postmenopausal women. (See BOXED WARNINGS and
`WARNINGS, Dementia.)
`
`INDICATIONS AND USAGE
`
`MenostarTM is indicated for the prevention of postmenopausal osteoporosis. Therapy
`should be considered only for women at significant risk of osteoporosis. Non-estrogen
`medications should be carefirlly considered.
`
`The mainstays for decreasing the risk of postmenopausal osteoporosis are weight bearing
`exercise, adequate calcium and vitamin D intake, and when indicated, pharmacologic
`therapy. Postmenopausal women require an average of 1500mg/day of elemental
`calcium. Therefore, when not contraindicated, calcium supplementation may be helpfiil
`for women with subOptimal dietary intake. Vitamin D supplementation of 400-800
`IU/day may also be required to ensure adequate daily intake in postmenopausal women.
`
`Risk factors for osteoporosis include low bone mineral density, low estrogen levels,
`family history of osteoporosis, previous fracture, small frame (low BMJ), light skin color,
`smoking, and ”alcohol intake. Response to therapy can be predicted by pre-treaunent
`serum estradiol (see Table 3), and can be assessed during treatment by measuring
`biochemical markers of bone formationfresorption, and/or bone mineral density.
`
`Estrogen therapy reduces bone resorption and retards or halts postmenopausal bone loss.
`Studies have shown a risk ratio of about 0.4 for hip and wrist fractures in women whose
`estrogen therapy was begun within a few years of menopause, compared to women taking
`
` 
`
`0017
`
`

`

`10
`
`calcium and vitamin D alone. Studies also suggest that estrogen reduces the rate of
`vertebral fractures. Even when started as late as 6 years after menopause, estrogen
`reduces further loss of bone mass for as long as treatment is continued. When estrogen
`therapy is discontinued, bone mass declines at a rate comparable to the immediate
`postmenopausal period.
`
`Data fi'orn the Women’s Health Initiative study showed that use of estrogen (dose
`equivalent to 0.625 CE) resulted in about 6 less hip fractures per 10,000 women/years,
`compared to use of placebo (risk ratio about 0.6).
`
`CONTRAINDICATIONS
`
`P‘PP’N.‘
`
`MenostarT” should not be used in women with any of the following conditions:
`Undiagnosed abnormal genital bleeding.
`Known, suspected, or history of cancer of the breast.
`Known or suspected estrogen-dependent neoplasia.
`Active deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism or a history of these conditions.
`Active or recent (e.g. within the past year) arterial thrombocmbolic disease (e.g.,
`stroke, myocardial infarction).
`Liver dysfunction or disease.
`~19
`. MenostarTM should not be used in patients with known hypersensitivity to its
`ingredients.
`_
`8. Known or suspected pregnancy. There is no indication for MenostarTM in pregnancy.
`There appears to be little or no increased risk of birth defects in children born to
`women who have used estrogens and progestins from oral contraceptives
`inadvertently during early pregnancy (See PRECAUTIONS.)
`
`WARNINGS
`
`. See BOXED WARNINGS.
`
`1.
`
`Cardiovascular disorders.
`
`Estrogen and estrogen/progestin therapy have been associated with an increased risk of
`cardiovascular events such as myocardial infarction and stroke, as well as venous
`thrombosis and pulmonary embolism (venous thromboembolism or VTE). Should any of
`these occur or be suspected, estrogens should be discontinued immediately.
`
`Risk factors for arterial vascular diseaSe (e.g., hypertension, diabetes mellitus, tobacco
`use, hypercholesterolemia, and obesity) and/or venous thromboembolism (e.g., personal
`history or family history of VTE, obesity, and systemic lupus erythematosus) should be
`managed appropriately.
`
`a. Coronary heart disease and stroke
`In the Women's Health Initiative (WEI) study, an increase in the number of myocardial
`infarctions and strokes has been observed in women receiving CE compared to placebo.
`
` 
`
`0018
`
`

`

`ll
`
`These observations are preliminary (See CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, Clinical
`Studies.)
`
`In the CE/Nfl’A substudy of WI-I] an increased risk of coronary heart disease (CHD)
`events (defined as non-fatal myocardial infarction and CHD death) was observed in
`women receiving CE/MPA compared to women receiving placebo (37 vs.'30 per 10,000
`women years). The increase in risk was observed in year one and persisted.
`
`In the same substudy of WHI, an increased risk of stroke was observed in women
`receiving CE/MPA compared to women receiving placebo (29 vs. 21 per 10,000 women-
`years). The increase in risk Was observed after the first year and persisted.
`
`In postmenopausal women with documented heart disease
`(n = 2,763, average age 66.7 years) a controlled clinical trial of secondary prevention of
`cardiovascular disease (Heart and Estrogen/Progestin Replacement Study; HERS)
`treatment with CEMA (0.625mg/2.5mg per day) demonstrated no cardiovascular
`benefit. During an average follow—up of 4.1 years, treatment with CEIMPA did not
`reduce the overall rate of CHD events in postmenopausal women with established
`coronary heart disease. There were more CHD events in the CEMA—treated group than
`in the placebo group in year 1, but not during the subsequent years. Two thousand three
`hundred and twenty one women from the original HERS trial agreed to participate in an
`open label extension of HERS, HERS II. Average follow—up in HERS II was an
`additional 2.7 years, for a total of 6.8 years overall. Rates of CHD events were
`comparable among women in the CEfMPA group and the placebo group in HERS, HERS
`II, and overall.
`
`Large doses of estrogen (5 mg conjugated estrogens per day), comparable to those used
`to treat cancer of the prostate and breast, have been shown in a large prospective clinical
`trial in men to increase the risks of nonfatal myocardial infarction, pulmonary embolism,
`and thrombophlebitis.
`
`b. Venous thramboembalism (VTE)
`In the Women’s Health Initiative (WHI) study, an increase in VTE has been observed in
`women receiving CE compared to placebo. These observations are preliminary. (See
`CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, Clinical Studies.)
`
`In the CFJMPA substudy of WHI, a 2-fold greater rate of VTE, including deep venous
`thrombosis and pulmonary embolism, was observed in women receiving CE/MPA
`compared to women receiving placebo. The rate of VTE was 34 per 10,000 women -
`years in the CB/MPA group compared to 16 per 10,000 women—years in the placebo
`group. The increase in VTE risk was observed during the first year and persisted.
`
`If feasible, estrogens should be discontinued at least 4 to 6 weeks before surgery of the
`type associated with an increased risk of thromboembolism, or during periods of
`prolonged immobilization.
`
` 
`
`0019
`
`

`

`l2
`
`2.
`
`Malignant neoplasms
`
`a. Endometrr'al cancer
`
`The use of unopposed estrogens in women with intact uteri has been associated with an
`increased risk of endometrial cancer. The reported endometrial cancer risk among
`unopposed estrogen users is about 2- to 12-fold greater than in non-users, and appears
`dependent on duration of treatment and on estrogen dose. Most studies show no
`significant increased risk associated with use of estrogens for less than one year. The
`greatest risk appears associated with prolonged use, with increased risks of 15- to 24-fold
`for five to ten years or more and this risk has been shown to persist for at least 8 to 15
`years after estrogen therapy is discontinued.
`
`Clinical surveillance of all women taking estrogen/progestin combinations is important.
`Adequate diagnostic

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket