throbber
United States Patent
`(12)
`(10) Patent No.:
`US 9,730,900 B2
`
`Mantelle
`(45) Date of Patent:
`*Aug. 15, 2017
`
`US009730900B2
`
`(54) TRANSDERMAL ESTROGEN DEVICE AND
`DELIVERY
`
`(75)
`
`.
`.
`Juan Mantelle, Mlaml, FL (US)
`
`.
`Inventor.
`.
`.
`.
`(73) ASSlgnee: Noven Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Mlaml,
`FL (US)
`~
`~
`~
`~
`Subject. to any dlsclalmer, the term ofthls
`patent ls extended or adjusted under 35
`U.S.C. 154(b) by 0 days.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`Thls patent ls subject to a termlnal dls-
`Claimer.
`
`:1:
`
`.
`~
`) Notlce.
`
`(
`
`(21) Appl. No.: 13/553,972
`-
`,
`Ffled‘
`
`(22)
`
`(65)
`
`Jul“ 20’ 2012
`_
`_
`_
`Prlor Publlcatlon Data
`
`US ZOE/0156815 A1
`
`mm 20: 2013
`_
`_
`Related US. Application Data
`.
`.
`.
`.
`(63) Contlnuatlon of appllcatlon No. 12/216,811, filed on
`Jul. 10, 2008, now Pat. No. 8,231,906.
`
`(2006.01)
`(200691)
`(2017.01)
`(2006.01)
`(2006.01)
`
`(51)
`
`52
`
`)
`
`(
`
`Int. Cl.
`A61K 31/565
`A61K 9/70
`A61K 47/10
`A61K 47/32
`A61K 9/00
`'
`'
`'
`U S Cl
`CPC .......... A61K 9/7069 (2013.01); A61K 9/0014
`(2013.01); A61K 9/7061 (2013.01); A61K
`31/565 (2013.01); A61K 47/10 (2013.01);
`A61K 47/32 (2013.01)
`(58) Field of Classification Search
`None
`See application file for complete search history.
`
`2/1991 Sablotsky et a1.
`4,994,278 A
`9/1992 Otsuka et a1.
`5,151,271 A
`12/1993 Cleary et a1.
`5,271,940 A
`4/1994 Sablotsky et a1.
`5,300,291 A
`9/1994 Kochinke
`5,350,581 A
`8/1995 Mantelle
`5,446,070 A
`12/1995 Miranda et a1.
`5,474,783 A
`12/1995 Gray et 31.
`5,474,787 A
`4/1996 Kim et a1.
`5,505,956 A
`10/1996 Allen et a1.
`5,567,488 A
`3/1997 Woodard et a1.
`RE35,474 E
`8/1997 Miranda et a1.
`5 656 286 A
`9/1997 Gonella
`5,665,377 A
`3/1998 Lehmann et al.
`5,730,999 A
`6/1998 Barnhart et a1.
`5 762 952 A
`11/1998 Kenealy et a1.
`5,837,280 A
`5/1999 Chen et a1.
`5,902,603 A
`5/1999 LIPP et aL
`5,904,931 A
`5/1999 Farinas et a1.
`5,906,830 A
`7/1999 Farinas et a1.
`5,928,666 A
`9/1999 Miranda et a1.
`5,958,446 A
`2/2000 Miranda et a1.
`6,024,976 A
`12/2000 Rovati et a1.
`6,156,335 A
`4/2001 Miranda et al.
`6,221,383 B1
`5/2001 Miranda et a1.
`6,235,306 B1
`1/2002 Kanios et a1.
`6,337,086 B1
`5/2003 Mantelle et a1.
`6,562,363 B1
`6,638,528 B1* 10/2003 K '
`.......................... 424/449
`6,808,739 B2
`10/2004 $212531.
`7,456,159 B2
`11/2008 Houze et a1.
`8,231,906 B2
`7/2012 Mantelle
`8,343,538 B2
`1/2013 Kanios et a1.
`2003/0099695 A1
`5/2003 Mueller
`2002/0100185 A1
`8/2002 Sltz et a1.
`2003/0228354 A1
`12/2003 Muraoka et a1.
`2005/0129749 A1
`6/2005 Strauss
`2005/0169977 A1
`8/2005 Kanios
`2005/0202073 A1
`9/2005 Jackson et a1.
`2006 0078602 A1
`4 2006 Kanios et a .
`2006/0078601 A1*
`4/2006 Kanios et a1.
`/
`/
`'
`1
`2006/0233870 A1
`10/2006 Houze et a1,
`2006/0240087 A1
`10/2006 Houze et al.
`(Continued)
`
`................ 424/449
`
`EP
`
`FOREIGN PATENT DOCUMENTS
`0 887 075 A2
`12/1998
`
`(56)
`
`References Cited
`
`OTHER PUBLICATIONS
`
`U.S. PATENT DOCUMENTS
`
`4,390,520 A
`4,559,222 A
`4,584,355 A
`4,585,836 A
`4,591,622 A
`4,624,665 A *
`4,655,767 A
`4,746,515 A
`4,769,028 A
`4314468 A
`
`45915950 A
`4,938,759 A
`4,983,395 A
`4,994,267 A
`
`6/1983 Nagai et 31.
`12/1985 Enscore et a1.
`4/1986 B1'
`(1
`t
`1.
`4/1986 H032: ete a:
`5/1986 Blizzard et a1.
`11/1986 Nuwayser ..................... 604/307
`4/1987 Woodard et a1.
`5/1988 Cheng et a1.
`9/1988 Hoffmann et a1.
`3/1989 SabIOtSkY et 3L
`
`4/1990 Miranda et a1.
`7/1990 Enscore et a1.
`1/1991 Chang et a1.
`2/ 1991 Sablotsky
`
`Vaughan, “Using Solubility Parameters in Cosmetics Formulation,”
`J. Soc. Cosmet. Chem, V01. 36, pp. 319-333 (1985).
`~
`(commued)
`.
`.
`.
`.
`Primary Examiner i Mellssa FISheI'
`(74) Attorney, Agent, or Firm 7 Foley & Lardner LLP
`
`ABSTRACT
`(57)
`Described are transdermal drug delivery systems for the
`transdermal administration of estrogen, comprising a poly-
`
`merma rlx an es rogen.
`SYStemS also are descrlbed
`
`e 0 so m lng an uSlng suc
`
`23 Claims, 1 Drawing Sheet
`
`  
`
`
 
`
`MYLAN - EXHIBIT 1001
`
`

`

`US 9,730,900 B2
`
`Page 2
`
`(56)
`
`References Cited
`U.S. PATENT DOCUMENTS
`
`2009/0041831 A1*
`2012/0258942 A1
`
`2/2009 Miller et al.
`10/2012 Kanios et al.
`
`.................. 424/448
`
`OTHER PUBLICATIONS
`
`Feldmann et al., “Percutaneous Penetration of Steroids in Man,”
`The Journal of Investigative Dermatology, vol. 52, No. 1, pp. 89-94,
`1969.
`Schaefer et al., “Contraception via Topical Application? A Review,”
`Contraception, vol. 20, No. 3, pp. 225-236, Sep. 1979.
`Rietschel et al., “Elfects of harvesting techniques on hydration
`dynamics: gravimetric studies of stratum corneum,” J. Soc. Cosmet.
`Chem., vol. 29, pp. 777-782, Dec. 1978.
`Feldstein et al., “Modeling of percutaneous drug transport in vitro
`using skin-imitating Carbosil membrane,” Journal of Controlled
`Release, vol. 52, pp. 25-40, 1998.
`Pfister, “Transdermal and Dermal Therapeutic Systems: Current
`Status,” Transdermal and Topical Drug Delivery Systems, Ghosh et
`al., eds., Chapter 2, pp. 33-112, 1997.
`Dow Corning, :“Dow Corning® BIO-PSA Standard Silicone Adhe-
`sives,” Product Information, Jul. 28, 2008.
`Janisch et al., Email correspondence, Mar. 10, 2016.
`Manngold, Apr. 28, 2004 letter to Angela Nwaneri re: Duro-Tak®
`87-4287 and 87-2287.
`Noven Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Response filed in European applica-
`tion No. 097902118 on Dec. 19, 2014.
`Mantelle, “DOT Matrix® Technology,” Modified-Release Drug
`Delivery Technology, Rathbone et al. eds., Chapter 30, pp. 405-415,
`May 28, 2008.
`Office Action dated on May 5, 2016 in US. Appl. No. 14/024,985
`(US Pat. No. 2014-0200530).
`Notice of Allowance dated on Oct. 2, 2015 in US. Appl. No.
`14/024,985 (US Pat. No. 2014-0200530).
`Office Action dated on Apr. 29, 2016 in US. Appl. No. 14/738,255
`(US Pat. No. 2015-0272905).
`Office Action dated on Oct. 26, 2015 in US. Appl. No. 14/738,255
`(US Pat. No. 2015-0272905).
`Toole et al., “Evaluation of irritation and sensitisation of two 50
`ug/day oestrogen patches,” Maturitas, vol. 43, pp. 257-263, Dec.
`2002.
`Marty, “New trends in transdermal technologies: Development of
`the skin patch, Menorest®,” International Journal of Gynecology &
`Obstetrics, vol. 52, Suppl. 1, pp. 817-820, Mar. 1996.
`Novartis, “Estraderm®,” Prescribing information, Jun. 2004.
`Novartis, “Vivelle®,” Prescribing information, Jun. 2004.
`Novartis, “Vivelle-Dot®,” Prescribing information, Jun. 2004.
`Bayer Healthcare, “Climara®,” Prescribing information, 2007.
`3M Pharmaceuticals, “MenostarTM,” Prescribing information, Jun.
`2004.
`Watson Pharma,
`2005.
`Serono Laboratories,
`Aug. 1998.
`Notice of Allowance dated on Jan. 10, 2017 in US. Appl. No.
`14/024,985 (US Pat. No. 2014-0200530).
`Office Action dated Sep. 7, 2016 in US. Appl. No. 14/870,574 (US.
`Pat. No. 2016-0015655).
`European Office Action dated on Feb. 14, 2017 in application No.
`EP 097902118.
`Mantelle et al., “Effect of Silicone/Acrylic PSA Blends on Skin
`Permation,” Proceed. Int’l, Symp. Control, Rel. Bioact. Mater., Jun.
`20-23, 1999.
`Notice of Allowance dated on Apr. 26, 2017 in US. Appl. No.
`14/024,985 (US Pat. No. 2014/0200530).
`Office Action dated on Jun. 15, 2017 in US. Appl. No. 14/870,574
`(US Pat. No. 2016/0015655).
`
`Inc., “Alora®,” Prescribing information, May
`
`Inc., “Esclim®,” Prescribing information,
`
`* cited by examiner
`
`Sobieski et al., “Silicone Pressure Sensitive Adhesives,” Handbook
`ofPressure—Sensitive Adhesive Technology. 2"d ed., pp. 508-517 (D.
`Satas, ed.), Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York (1989).
`“Acrylic Adhesives,” Handbook of Pressure—Sensitive Adhesive
`Technology, 2"d ed., pp. 396-456 (D. Satas, ed.), Van Nostrand
`Reinhold, NY. (1989).
`International Preliminary Report on Patentability and Written Opin-
`ion issued Apr. 19, 2007.
`International Search Report issued on Apr. 6, 2005 in application
`No. PCT/US2004/029789.
`International Search Report issued on Feb. 24, 2011 in application
`No. PCT/US2009/050069.
`“Acrylic and Methacrylic Ester Polymers,” Polymer Science and
`Engineering, vol. 1, 2"d ed., pp. 234-269, John Wiley & Sons
`(1984).
`Office Action issued on Sep. 9, 2010 in LS. Appl. \Io. 12/216,811
`(L.S. Pat. \Io. 8,231,906).
`Office Action issued on Jan. 20, 2011 in L .8. Appl. \Io. 12/216,811
`(L.S. Pat. \Io. 8,231,906).
`Office Action issued on Jun. 30, 2011 in L .8. Appl. \Io. 12/216,811
`(L.S. Pat. \Io. 8,231,906).
`Office Action issued on Sep. 13,2011 in L .8. Appl. \Io. 12/216,811
`(L.S. Pat. \Io. 8,231,906).
`Office Action issued on Nov. 8, 2011 in US. Appl. \Io. 12/216,811
`(L.S. Pat. \Io. 8,231,906).
`Office Action issued on May 29, 2012 in L .8. Appl. \Io. 12/216,811
`(L.S. Pat. \Io. 8,231,906).
`Notice of Allowance issued on Jun. 19, 2012 in US. Appl. No.
`12/216,811 (US Pat. No. 8,231,906).
`Office Action issued on Dec. 29, 2010 in L .8. Appl. \Io. 11/245,084
`(L.S. Pat. \Io. 8,343,538).
`Office Action issued on Apr. 14, 2010 in L .8. Appl. \Io. 11/245,084
`(L.S. Pat. \Io. 8,343,538).
`Office Action issued on Jun. 10, 2009 in L .8. Appl. \Io. 11/245,084
`(L.S. Pat. \Io. 8,343,538).
`Office Action issued on Oct. 26, 2011 in L .8. Appl. \Io. 11/245,084
`(L.S. Pat. \Io. 8,343,538).
`Office Action issued on May 13, 2011 in L .8. Appl. \Io. 11/245,084
`(L.S. Pat. \Io. 8,343,538).
`Office Action issued on Jun. 13, 2012 in L .8. Appl. \Io. 11/245,084
`(L.S. Pat. \Io. 8,343,538).
`Notice of Allowance issued on Aug. 22, 2012 in US. Appl. No.
`11/245,084 (US Pat. No. 8,343,538).
`Novartis Pharmacueticals Corportion, “Vivelle-Dot® (estradiol
`transdermal system),” prescripton labeling, Aug. 2004.
`Benson, “Transdermal Drug Delivery: Penetration Enhancement
`Techniques,” Current Drug Delivery, vol. 2, pp. 22-33, 2005.
`Nagai et al., “New Drug Delivery Systems,” Kurashiki Printing Co.
`Ltd., Academic Document 2009-00984-005, published Jan. 31,
`2000.
`Sekine et al., “New Cosmetic Handbook,” Nikko Chemical Co.
`Ltd., et al., Academic Documents 2008-02180-001, published Oct.
`30, 2006.
`Office Action issued on May 20, 2015 in US. Appl. No. 14/024,985
`(US 2014/0200530).
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`US. Patent
`
`Aug. 15, 2017
`
`US 9,730,900 B2
`
`+ \fwelle—Dot
`
`
`
`+ Example 1
`+ Example 1a
`
`
`(pglcm'thr)
`
`Flux
`
`o
`
`12
`
`24
`
`36
`
`48
`
`60
`
`72
`
`34
`
`Time (hrs)
`
`

`

`US 9,730,900 B2
`
`1
`TRANSDERMAL ESTROGEN DEVICE AND
`DELIVERY
`
`RELATED APPLICATIONS
`
`This application is a continuation of US. patent applica-
`tion Ser. No.12/216,811, filed Jul. 10, 2008 (now US. Pat.
`No. 8,231,906), which is incorporated herein by reference in
`its entirety.
`
`FIELD OF THE INVENTION
`
`Described herein are compositions and methods for the
`transdermal delivery of estrogen.
`
`BACKGROUND
`
`This invention relates generally to transdermal drug deliv-
`ery systems, and more particularly,
`to transdermal drug
`delivery systems for the delivery of estrogen. The use of a
`transdermal system, for example, a patch comprising a
`pressure-sensitive adhesive containing a drug, as a means of
`delivering drug through the skin is well known. However,
`there remains a need for transdermal drug delivery systems
`designed for the delivery of specific drugs, such as estrogen,
`and there remains a particular need for smaller transdermal
`drug delivery systems that exhibit desired pharmacokinetic
`properties.
`Transdermal delivery systems (adhesive patches) as dos-
`age forms have been the subject of a vast number of patent
`applications over the last 25 years, yielding many patents but
`few commercial products in comparison. To those working
`in the field,
`the relatively small number of commercial
`products is not surprising. Although regulatory, economic,
`and market hurdles play a role in limiting the number of
`products on the market, the task of developing a transdermal
`delivery system that achieves desired physical and pharma-
`cokinetic parameters to satisfy physician and patient demand
`is more daunting. Parameters to be considered during com-
`mercial product development may include drug solubility,
`drug stability (e.g., as may arise from interaction with other
`component materials and/or the environment), delivery of a
`therapeutic amount of drug at a desired delivery rate over the
`intended duration of use, adequate adhesion at the anatomi-
`cal site of application,
`integrity (e.g., minimal curling,
`wrinkling, delaminating and slippage) with minimal discom-
`fort, irritation and sensitization both during use and during
`and after removal, and minimal residual adhesive (or other
`components) after removal. Size also may be important from
`a manufacturing and patient viewpoint, and appearance may
`be important from a patient viewpoint. The physical manu-
`facturing and production aspects of commercial product
`development (e.g., the identity and costs of materials, equip-
`ment, and labor) and supporting analytical methods required
`for regulatory compliance also can be significant.
`Of the physical parameters that are considered when
`developing a commercial transdermal drug delivery system,
`size, e.g., surface area at the site of application,
`is often
`dictated and limited by other physical and pharmacokinetic
`requirements, such as desired drug delivery rates and daily
`dosages. In general,
`it
`is easier to develop a relatively
`“large” transdermal drug delivery system that will achieve
`drug delivery at target therapeutic levels over an intended
`duration of therapy, than it is to develop a smaller transder-
`mal drug delivery system that still exhibits acceptable phar-
`macokinetic properties. Still, because size directly impacts
`costs (e.g., costs of component materials, costs of packaging
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`40
`
`45
`
`50
`
`55
`
`60
`
`65
`
`2
`
`materials, costs for production and manufacturing equip-
`ment, labor costs relative to product yield per run time, etc.)
`and patients generally prefer smaller systems to larger ones
`(both for aesthetic reasons and comfort, since a smaller
`surface may permit the use of less aggressive adhesives),
`there is a need for smaller transdermal drug delivery sys-
`tems.
`
`SUMMARY
`
`In accordance with one embodiment, there is provided a
`transdermal drug delivery system comprising a drug con-
`taining layer defining an active surface area and comprising
`a polymer matrix comprising estradiol, wherein the system
`includes greater than 0.156 mg/cm2 estradiol and achieves
`an estradiol flux that is greater than 0.01 mg/cmZ/day, based
`on the active surface area.
`In some embodiments,
`the
`polymer matrix comprises a polymer blend comprising an
`acrylic adhesive, a silicone adhesive, and soluble PVP. In
`some embodiments, the polymer matrix comprises about
`2-25% by weight acrylic adhesive, about 45-70% by weight
`silicone adhesive, about 2-25% by weight soluble PVP,
`about 5-15% penetration enhancer, and about 0.1-10% by
`weight estradiol, all based on the total dry weight of the
`polymer matrix. In some embodiments, the polymer matrix
`comprises about 20% by weight acrylic adhesive, about
`56.9% by weight silicone adhesive, about 7.5% by weight
`soluble PVP, about 6.0% by weight oleyl alcohol, about
`8.0% by weight dipropylene glycol, and about 1.6% by
`weight estradiol. In some embodiments, the acrylic adhesive
`and silicone adhesive are present in a ratio of from about 1:2
`to about 1:6, based on the total weight of the acrylic and
`silicone adhesives.
`
`the penetration enhancer com-
`In some embodiments,
`prises oleyl alchol or dipropylene glycol, or both.
`In some embodiments, the polymer matrix comprises an
`amount of estradiol effective to deliver a therapeutically
`effective amount of estradiol over a period of time selected
`from the group consisting of at least 1 day, at least 2 days,
`at least 3 days, at least 4 days, at least 5 days, at least 6 days
`and at least 7 days. In some embodiments, the polymer
`matrix comprises an amount of estradiol effective to deliver
`an amount of estradiol selected from the group consisting of
`about 0.025, 0.0375, 0.05, 0.075 and 0.1 mg/day.
`In some embodiments, the polymer matrix has a coat
`weight of greater than about 10 mg/cmz. In some embodi-
`ments, the polymer matrix has a coat weight selected from
`the group consisting of about 12.5 and about 15 mg/ cm2.
`In accordance with some embodiments, there is provided
`a transdermal drug delivery system comprising a polymer
`matrix comprising estradiol, wherein the system has an
`active surface area that is about 60% of a size selected from
`
`the group consisting of 2.5, 3.75, 5.0, 7.5 and 10.0 cm2 and
`is effective to deliver an amount of estradiol per day of about
`0.025, 0.0375, 0.05, 0.075 and 0.1 mg/day, respectively.
`In accordance with some embodiments, there is provided
`a method for administering estradiol, comprising applying to
`the skin or mucosa of a subject in need thereof a transdermal
`drug delivery system comprising a drug-containing layer
`defining an active surface area and comprising a polymer
`matrix comprising estradiol, wherein the system includes
`greater than 0.156 mg/cm2 estradiol and achieves an estra-
`diol flux that is greater than 0.01 mg/cmZ/day, based on the
`active surface area. In some embodiments, the system has an
`active surface area that is about 60% of a size selected from
`
`the group consisting of 2.5, 3.75, 5.0, 7.5 and 10.0 cm2 and
`
`

`

`US 9,730,900 B2
`
`3
`is effective to deliver an amount of estradiol per day of about
`0.025, 0.0375, 0.05, 0.075 and 0.1 mg/day, respectively.
`In accordance with some embodiments, there is provided
`a method of making a transdermal drug delivery system for
`administering estrogen, comprising forming a polymer
`matrix comprising estrogen and a polymer blend comprising
`an acrylic adhesive, a silicone adhesive, and soluble PVP,
`and applying the polymer matrix to a support layer such that
`the system includes greater than 0.156 mg/cm2 estradiol. In
`some embodiments, the system has an active surface area
`that is about 60% of a size selected from the group consist-
`ing of 2.5, 3.75, 5.0, 7.5 and 10.0 cm2. In some embodi-
`ments, the polymer matrix comprises about 20% by weight
`acrylic adhesive, about 56.9% by weight silicone adhesive,
`about 7.5% by weight soluble PVP, about 6.0% by weight
`oleyl alcohol, about 8.0% by weight dipropylene glycol, and
`about 1.6% by weight estradiol. In some embodiments, the
`polymer matrix is applied to the support layer at a coat
`weight of greater than about 10 mg/cm2. In some embodi-
`ments, the polymer matrix coat weight is selected from the
`group consisting of about 12.5 and about 15 mg/ cm2.
`
`BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
`
`FIG. 1 illustrates the estradiol flux (ug/cmZ/hr) over time
`(0-81 hours) from transdermal delivery systems according to
`the invention (A & O), as compared to V1velle-Dot® (9).
`
`DETAILED DESCRIPTION
`
`The field of transdermal delivery systems suffers from the
`problem of needing to balance many different competing
`factors to develop a commercial product that exhibits, for
`example both clinical efficacy and satisfactory wear prop-
`erties while remaining acceptable to patients. For example,
`when selecting the size of a transdermal delivery system, it
`is necessary to balance factors that favor a smaller size (such
`as lower cost, better adhesive performance and improved
`aesthetics) against factors that favor a larger size (such as the
`target delivery rate (flux) and daily dose). The Vivelle-Dot®
`transdermal estradiol product
`(manufactured by Noven
`Pharmaceuticals Inc.) is available in five different active
`surface areas (2.5, 3.75, 5.0, 7.5 and 10.0 cm2) which each
`deliver different amounts of drug per day (0.025, 0.0375,
`0.05, 0.075 and 0.1 mg/day, respectively). Each of the
`Vivelle-Dot® products include 0.156 mg/cm2 estradiol.
`In accordance with some embodiments, the present inven-
`tion provides transdermal drug delivery systems for the
`transdermal delivery of estrogen that have a smaller active
`surface area than V1velle-Dot® but achieve daily dosages
`that are about equal to or greater than the Vivelle-Dot®
`products. For example, the present invention includes trans-
`dermal drug delivery systems that achieve daily dosages that
`are about equal to a Vivelle-Dot® product, in a smaller sized
`system. The ability to provide a smaller system without
`sacrificing daily dosage represents a significant advance.
`Applicant surprisingly discovered that increasing the coat
`weight of the drug-containing adhesive layer resulted in an
`increased flux per unit area, and thus permitted the devel-
`opment of smaller transdermal drug delivery systems that
`achieve comparable daily dosages. This result was surpris-
`ing because coat weight is typically selected to control the
`duration of delivery, but
`is not generally understood to
`impact delivery rate. Thus, while it is known in the art to
`increase coat weight to provide delivery over a longer period
`of time, it was not known that increasing coat weight could
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`40
`
`45
`
`50
`
`55
`
`60
`
`65
`
`4
`
`increase delivery rate or flux, and thus permit the develop-
`ment of a smaller system while maintaining daily dosage.
`In accordance with some aspects,
`there are provided
`transdermal drug delivery systems and methods for the
`transdermal delivery of estrogen. In specific embodiments,
`the systems exhibit increased flux than other known estrogen
`devices (such as Vivelle-Dot®, manufactured by Noven
`Pharmaceuticals Inc.) and, therefore, exhibit increased drug
`delivery per unit area. For example, in some embodiments,
`the systems exhibit a flux greater than the 0.01 mg/cm2/day
`exhibited by the Vivelle-Dot® products, such as a flux that
`is about 1.25, 1.33, 1.5, 1.67, 1.75, 2, 3, 4, or 5 times the flux
`of the Vivelle-Dot® products. In some embodiments, the
`systems have a greater coat weight than other known estro-
`gen devices. For example, in some embodiments, the sys-
`tems have a coat weight such that the amount of estradiol per
`unit area is greater than the 0.156 mg/cm2 estradiol of the
`Vivelle-Dot® products, such as a coat weight that is about
`1.25, 1.33, 1.5, 1.67, 1.75, 2, or 3 times the coat weight of
`the Vivelle-Dot® products, or greater. Thus, in accordance
`with some aspects, the invention permits the use of smaller
`devices to achieve comparable drug delivery.
`Definitions
`Technical and scientific terms used herein have the mean-
`
`ings commonly understood by one of ordinary skill in the art
`to which the present invention pertains, unless otherwise
`defined. Reference is made herein to various methodologies
`known to those of ordinary skill in the art. Publications and
`other materials setting forth such known methodologies to
`which reference is made are incorporated herein by refer-
`ence in their entireties as though set forth in full. Any
`suitable materials and/or methods known to those of ordi-
`
`nary skill in the art can be utilized in carrying out the present
`invention. However, specific materials and methods are
`described. Materials, reagents and the like to which refer-
`ence is made in the following description and examples are
`obtainable from commercial
`sources, unless otherwise
`noted.
`
`As used herein, the singular forms “a,” “an,” and “the”
`designate both the singular and the plural, unless expressly
`stated to designate the singular only.
`The term “about” and the use of ranges in general,
`whether or not qualified by the term about, means that the
`number comprehended is not limited to the exact number set
`forth herein, and is intended to refer to ranges substantially
`within the quoted range while not departing from the scope
`of the invention. As used herein, “about” will be understood
`by persons of ordinary skill in the art and will vary to some
`extent on the context in which it is used. If there are uses of
`
`the term which are not clear to persons of ordinary skill in
`the art given the context in which it is used, “about” will
`mean up to plus or minus 10% of the particular term.
`The phrase “substantially free” as used herein generally
`means that
`the described composition (e.g.,
`transdermal
`drug delivery system, polymer matrix, etc.) comprises less
`than about 5%, less than about 3%, or less than about 1% by
`weight, based on the total weight of the composition at issue,
`of the excluded component.
`As used herein “subject” denotes any animal in need of
`drug therapy, including humans. For example, a subject may
`be suffering from or at risk of developing a condition that
`can be treated or prevented with estrogen, or may be taking
`estrogen for health maintenance purposes.
`As used herein,
`the phrases “therapeutically effective
`amount” and “therapeutic level” mean that drug dosage or
`plasma concentration in a subject, respectively, that provides
`the specific pharmacological response for which the drug is
`
`

`

`US 9,730,900 B2
`
`5
`administered in a subject in need of such treatment. It is
`emphasized that a therapeutically effective amount or thera-
`peutic level of a drug will not always be effective in treating
`the conditions/diseases described herein, even though such
`dosage is deemed to be a therapeutically effective amount by
`those of skill in the art. For convenience only, exemplary
`dosages, drug delivery amounts,
`therapeutically effective
`amounts and therapeutic levels are provided below with
`reference to adult human subjects. Those skilled in the art
`can adjust such amounts in accordance with standard prac-
`tices as needed to treat a specific subject and/or condition/
`disease.
`As used herein, “active surface area” means the surface
`area of the drug-containing layer of the transdermal drug
`delivery system.
`As used herein, “coat weight” refers to the weight of the
`drug-containing layer per unit area of the active surface area
`of the transdermal drug delivery system.
`As used herein, “estrogen” includes estrogenic steroids
`such as estradiol (l7—[3-estradiol), estradiol benzoate, estra-
`diol
`l7B-cypionate, estropipate, equilenin, equilin, estriol,
`estrone, ethinyl estradiol, conjugated estrogens, esterified
`estrogens, and mixtures thereof.
`As used herein, “flux” (also called “permeation rate”) is
`defined as the absorption of a drug through skin or mucosal
`tissue, and is described by Fick’s first law of diffusion:
`
`J:—D(de/dx)
`
`where J is the flux in g/cm2/sec, D is the diffusion coefficient
`of the drug through the skin or mucosa in cmZ/sec and
`de/dx is the concentration gradient of the drug across the
`skin or mucosa.
`
`As used herein, the term “transdermal” refers to delivery,
`administration or application of a drug by means of direct
`contact with skin or mucosa. Such delivery, administration
`or application is also known as dermal, percutaneous, trans-
`mucosal and buccal. As used herein, “dermal” includes skin
`and mucosa, which includes oral, buccal, nasal, rectal and
`vaginal mucosa.
`As used herein, “transdermal drug delivery system” refers
`to a system (e.g., a device) comprising a composition that
`releases estrogen upon application to the skin (or any other
`surface noted above). A transdermal drug delivery system
`may comprise a backing layer, a drug-containing layer, and
`a release liner layer. In some embodiments, the transdermal
`drug delivery system is a substantially non-aqueous, solid
`form, capable of conforming to the surface with which it
`comes into contact, and capable of maintaining such contact
`so as to facilitate topical application without adverse physi-
`ological response, and without being appreciably decom-
`posed by aqueous contact during topical application to a
`subject. Many such systems are known in the art and
`commercially available, such as transdermal drug delivery
`patches. As described below, in one embodiment, the trans-
`dermal drug delivery system comprises a drug-containing
`polymer matrix that comprises a pressure-sensitive adhesive
`or bioadhesive, and is adopted for direct application to a
`user’s (e.g., a subject’s) skin. In other embodiments, the
`polymer matrix is non-adhesive and may be provided with
`separate adhesion means (such as a separate adhesive layer)
`for application and adherence to the user’s skin.
`As used herein, “polymer matrix” refers to a polymer
`composition which contains one or more drugs. In some
`embodiments,
`the matrix comprises a pressure-sensitive
`adhesive polymer or a bioadhesive polymer.
`In other
`embodiments,
`the matrix does not comprise a pressure-
`sensitive adhesive or bioadhesive. As used herein, a polymer
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`40
`
`45
`
`50
`
`55
`
`60
`
`65
`
`6
`is an “adhesive” if it has the properties of an adhesive per se,
`or if it functions as an adhesive by the addition of tackifiers,
`plasticizers, crosslinking agents or other additives. Thus, in
`some embodiments, the polymer matrix comprises a pres-
`sure-sensitive adhesive polymer or a bioadhesive polymer,
`with estrogen dissolved or dispersed therein. The polymer
`matrix also may comprise tackifiers, plasticizers, crosslink-
`ing agents or other additives described herein. US. Pat. No.
`6,024,976 describes polymer blends that are useful in accor-
`dance with the transdermal systems described herein. The
`entire contents of US. Pat. No. 6,024,976 is incorporated
`herein by reference.
`As used herein, the term “pressure-sensitive adhesive”
`refers to a viscoelastic material which adheres instanta-
`
`neously to most substrates with the application of very slight
`pressure and remains permanently tacky. A polymer is a
`pressure-sensitive adhesive within the meaning of the term
`as used herein if it has the properties of a pressure-sensitive
`adhesive per se or functions as a pressure-sensitive adhesive
`by admixture with tackifiers, plasticizers or other additives.
`The term pressure-sensitive adhesive also includes mix-
`tures of different polymers and mixtures of polymers, such
`as polyisobutylenes (PIB), of different molecular weights,
`wherein each resultant mixture is a pressure-sensitive adhe-
`sive. In the last case,
`the polymers of lower molecular
`weight in the mixture are not considered to be “tackifiers,”
`said term being reserved for additives which differ other than
`in molecular weight from the polymers to which they are
`added.
`
`In some embodiments, the polymer matrix is a pressure-
`sensitive adhesive at room temperature and has other desir-
`able characteristics for adhesives used in the transdermal
`
`drug delivery art. Such characteristics include good adher-
`ence to skin, ability to be peeled or otherwise removed
`without substantial trauma to the skin, retention of tack with
`aging, etc. In some embodiments, the polymer matrix has a
`glass transition temperature (Tg), measured using a differ-
`ential scanning calorimeter, of between about —70° C. and 0°
`C.
`
`As used herein, the term “rubber-based pressure-sensitive
`adhesive” refers to a viscoelastic material which has the
`
`properties of a pressure-sensitive adhesive and which con-
`tains at least one natural or synthetic elastomeric polymer.
`In some embodiments,
`the transdermal drug delivery
`system includes one or more additional layers, such as one
`or more additional polymer matrix layers, or one or more
`adhesive layers that adhere the transdermal drug delivery
`system to the user’s skin. In other embodiments, the trans-
`dermal drug delivery system is monolithic, meaning that it
`comprises a single polymer matrix layer comprising a pres-
`sure-sensitive adhesive or bioadhesive with drug dissolved
`or dispersed therein, and no rate-controlling membrane.
`The transdermal drug delivery system also may include a
`drug impermeable backing layer or film. In some embodi-
`ments, the backing layer is adjacent one face of the polymer
`matrix layer. When present, the backing layer protects the
`polymer matrix layer (and any other layers present) from the
`environment and prevents loss of the drug and/or release of
`other components to the environment during use. Materials
`suitable for use as backing layers are well-known known in
`the art and can comprise films of polyester, polyethylene,
`vinyl acetate resins, ethylene/vinyl acetate copolymers,
`polyvinyl chloride, polyurethane, and the like, metal foils,
`non-woven fabric, cloth and commercially available lami-
`nates. A typical backing material has a thickness in the range
`of 2 to 1000 micrometers.
`
`

`

`US 9,730,900 B2
`
`7
`The transdermal drug delivery system also may include a
`release liner, typically located adjacent the opposite face of
`the system as compared to the backing layer. When present,
`the release liner is removed from the system prior to use to
`expose the polymer matrix layer and/or an adhesive layer
`prior to topical application. Materials suitable for use as
`release liners are well-known known in the art and include
`
`the commercially available products of Dow Corning Cor-
`poration designated Bio-Release® liner and Syl-olf® 7610
`and 3M’s 1022 Scotch Pak.
`
`A used herein, a “monolithic” transdermal drug delivery
`system may include a backing layer and/or release liner.
`In accordance with some embodiments, the transdermal
`dug delivery system comprises a drug-containing polymer
`matrix layer that comprises a pressure-sensitive adhesive
`blend comprising an acrylic polymer, a silicone polymer,
`and a soluble PVP.
`
`Acrylic Polymers
`The term “acrylic polymer” is used here as in the art
`interchangeably with “polyacrylate,” “polyacrylic polymer,”
`and “acrylic adhesive.” The acrylic-based polymers can be
`any of the homopolymers, copolymers, terpolymers, and the
`like of various acrylic acids or esters. In

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket