throbber
O
`Umted States Patent
`
`[19]
`
`US005656286A
`
`[11] Patent Number:
`
`5,656,286
`
`
`Miranda et a1.
`[45] Date of Patent:
`Aug. 12, 1997
`
`[54] SOLUBILITY PARAMETER BASED DRUG
`DELIVERY SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR
`ALTERmGRIXRUG SATURATION
`CONCENT
`TION
`,
`Inventors: Jesus Miranda; Steven Sablotsky,
`both of Miami Fla.
`
`[75]
`
`[73] Assignee: Noven Pharmaceuticals, Inc.. Miami,
`Fla.
`
`[21] APP!‘ N0" 178558
`[22] Filed:
`Jan. 7, 1994
`
`Related US. Application Data
`.
`,
`.
`[63] Continuauon-m-part “Set-180722342, J‘tn' 27’ 1991’ Pat
`No. 5,474,783, which 15 a conunuauon-m-part of PCF/
`US90/01750, Mar. 23, 1990, which is acontinuation-in—patt
`of Ser. No. 671,7091APL 2, 1991, Pat- No. 5,300,291,which
`is acontinuationJ -part of Ser. No. 295,847, Ian. 11, 1989,
`Pat No. 4,994,267, which is a continuation-in-part of Ser.
`No_ 154,432, Mar. 4, 1933, pat No. 4,814,168.
`6
`Int. Cl.
`...................................................... A61F 13/02
`[51]
`[52] U..S Cl. ............................................. 424/449, 424/448
`[58] Field of Search ...................................... 424/448, 449
`
`[56]
`
`References Cited
`
`..
`
`U'S‘ PMENT DOCUMENTS
`.. 260/37 SB
`7/1976 Penneck
`3,969,308
`424/28
`8/1976 Tsuk et a1.
`3,972,995
`424/23
`9/1981 Keith at 31'
`429L015
`424/28
`9/1981 Keith. et a1.
`4’292’301
`424/28
`6/1983 Nagm et a1.
`4,390,520
`424/28
`3/1984 Keith et a1.
`4,438,139
`424/28
`9/1935 Keith .........
`4,542,013
`4/1986 Sablotsky ____________ 604/896
`4535,452
`6/1986 Jevne et a1.
`.. 523/111
`4,593,053
`5/1987 Cordes et a].
`.. 604/897
`4,668,232
`9/1987 Chien et 31 ..
`-- 604/396
`4,690,633
`313:;
`2,232,331]
`1531;1391----------
`"4:31;:
`,
`,
`SO e ......
`..
`4,699,146 10/1987 Sieverding
`.. 128/640
`4,750,482
`6/1988 Sieverding .............................. 128/156
`
`
`
`
`FOREIGN PATENT DOCUMENTS
`2027053
`4/1991 Canada .
`0201328
`11/1986 European Fat. 011.
`208395
`1/1987 European Pat. Off. .
`0272045
`6/1988 European Pat. Off. .
`0343307
`11/1939 European Pat. Ofi‘.
`_
`0 371 496
`6/1990 European Pat. 0e. .
`0416842
`3/1991
`European Pat. Off. .
`0529123
`3/1993 European Fat 011“.
`,
`54-89017
`7/1979
`Japan .
`58-225010 1fl1983
`Japan .
`2 105 990
`4/1983 United Kin dom .
`91/05529
`5/1991 WIPo.
`g
`93/08795
`5/1993 WIPO ,
`
`OTHER PUBLICATIONS
`Yu et a1, ‘Transdennal Dual—Controlled Delivery of Test-
`osterone and Estradiol: (I) Impact of System Design.” Drug
`d
`1
`14_ 1 8
`1904 1
`1
`Dave/'1" "St- ”mm 7(
`)-
`3 3‘
`( 99 )-
`Ziller et a1., “Control of Crystal Growth in Drug Suspen-
`sions ” Pharm. Ind. 52(8):1017—1022 (1990)_
`,'
`_
`.
`,
`English tansilatlon of Japanese patent application No.
`2—48859
`e Feb. 27 1
`.
`9
`9
`Sloan, K. B. et 31., “Use of Solubility Parameters of Drug
`and Vehicle to Predict Flux Through Skin”, The Journal of
`Investigative Dermatology, vol. 87 (No. 2) pp. 244—252
`(Aug. 1986).
`
`Primary Examiner—Jyothsna Venkat
`Attorney, Agent, or Firm—Foley & Lardner
`
`ABSTRACT
`[57]
`Ablend of at least two polymers, or at least one polymer and
`a soluble polyvinylpyrrolidone, in combination with a drug
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`provrdes a pressure-sensmve adhesive composmon for .a
`fiaFSdel'mal
`(11118 delivery WWI? 111 “’th the drug. 15
`dehvered fi'om the pressure—sensmve adheswe composrtion
`and through denuis when the pressure-sensitive adhesive
`composition is in contact with human sln'n. According to the
`invention, soluble polyvinylpyrrolidone can be used to pre—
`vent crystallization of the drug, without aflecting the rate of
`dl'll
`-
`_
`.
`.
`.
`_
`SitiEndehvery from the pressure sen51t1ve adhes1ve compo
`'
`
`(List continued on next page.)
`
`73 Claims, 19 Drawing Sheets
`
`13
`
`
`
`///////////
`
`
`
`////////////////////////////////
`
`11
`
`
`
`12
`
`  
`
`
 
`
`MYLAN - EXHIBIT 1011
`
`

`

`5,656,286
`
`Page 2
`
`US. PATENT DOCUMENTS
`4,769,013
`9/1933 Lorenz et a1.
`.......................... 604/265
`4,314,163
`3/1939 Samotsky eta]
`424/73
`
`4345031
`7/1939 Sloan .....
`514/2322
`4,333,669
`11/1939 Chien etal.
`424/443
`4,906,169
`3/1990 wen etal
`.. 424/443
`4911916
`3,1990 Clear},
`........
`.. 424,449
`4:931:22“
`6,1990 Kim et 31 __
`.. 424,448
`4,937,393
`1/1991 Salamone etal. .
`123/156
`
`4,994,267
`2/1991 Sablotsky ............ 424/73
`
`5,032,403
`7/1991 Sinnreich
`424/443
`5,059,139 10/1991 Cilento etal.
`.......................... 604/307
`5,071,656 12/1991 Lee et a1.
`................................ 424/448
`
`
`
`6/1992 Khanna ................................ 514/7725
`5,122,543
`............ 424
`7/1992 B1
`5,123.133
`
`3/1992 L3: 81
`424%:
`5141750
`.
`................................
`,
`,
`9/1992 01su1meta1.
`.......................... 424/443
`5,151,271
`
`54544922 “3/1999 GM] at 31- "
`‘ 424/448
`5,230,396
`7/1993 Yeh et a1.
`............................... 424/443
`7/1993 Horsnnann ctal.
`.................... 424/449
`$230,393
`
`..... 424/443
`5,232,702
`3/1993 Pfister etal.
`
`3/1993 Blank ---------------- 424/449
`52324703
`5,252,334 10/1993 Chang et a1.
`--
`424/448
`5,260,064 11/1993 Nakagawa etal
`424/448
`
`. 424/443
`5,262,165
`11/1993 Govil et a1.
`..... 424/445
`5,393,529
`2/1995 Hoflinann et 21.
`
`..
`
`

`

`US. Patent
`
`Aug. 12, 1997
`
`Sheet 1 of 19
`
`5,656,286
`
`FIG. 1
`
`/////////// ////////////////
`
`
`
`
`//////////////////////////////
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Aug.
`
`
`
`
`
`VVVVVVV
`NNNNN
`
`

`

`y]ONU]9N
`
`I; Dm p—A
`
`/c
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` /
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`NNNNNN
`
`

`

`
`
` /
`
`
`
`....
`OOOOO
`
`

`

`US. Patent
`
`Aug. 12, 1997
`
`Sheet 5 of 19
`
`5,656,286
`
`N
`
`\V///
`
`FIG.6
`
`

`

`FIG.7
`
`
`
`
`
`O
`
`_
`
`7
`
`
`
`
`.......
`OOOOOOO
`OOOOOOO
`
`

`

`US. Patent
`
`U)
`
`(D(-r \I O
`
`\D
`
`5,656,286
`
`aEXAMPLE18
`
`[jEXAMPLE19 gEXAMPLE20
`
`2EXAMPLE17g
`
`- |
`
`||II|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||I||||||||||||||l|||||
`\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
`
`FIG.8
`
`)1v F
`
`A)—
`.C\
`(\l
`
`< EO\C
`
`LUX
`
`

`

`US. Patent
`
`Aug. 12,1997
`
`Sheet 8 of 19
`
`5,656,286
`
`mmeu
`
`IIEUIEI
`
`FIG.9
`
`§\
`
`Ill||||||l|||l||||l||||||ll
`
`e
`
`

`

`3\l
`
`m5"(D2
`
`OW H\O
`
`y]aU]9N
`
`/\D
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`
`
`/
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`(u//
`
`mmmmmmmmm
`NNNNNN
`
`

`

`U.S.Patent
`
`>c
`
`9.:
`
`illaxU]9NGO
`
`6
`
`
`\‘éfl
`\\\\B
`d\\\\;2l—<E
`LLl<r\
`Q.
`
`
`
`\\\\‘
`.
`\\§"~
`\g8LLl
`
`<1:
`
`.
`
`g
`33
`
`E<
`
`$2_I
`>—
`CE
`
`0(
`
`A
`
`3X
`mm
`0‘,
`
`9>
`
`—_J
`
`oD
`
`.
`
`$2
`
`3%
`:5
`om
`;v
`(I)
`
`20
`
`CD
`
`$-
`
`O
`
`\
`
`N1
`
`‘
`c:
`t
`
`(0. LQ‘li-C‘Q“! ".0.
`"t
`oooooooo
`
`

`

`US. Patent
`
`Aug. 12, 1997
`
`Sheet 12 of 19
`
`5,656,286
`
`oom
`
`com03
`
`
`
`AooflmicoVHzmzoiumoozO_mDu_n=Q
`
`83nNEAgggg;+EEOn> MKGt
`
`x3;
`
`Egg;
`
`

`

`U.S. Patent
`
`Aug. 12, 1997
`
`Sheet 13 of 19
`
`5,656,286
`
`
`
`N:g.253=8vEEEEEE3538E2
`
`0.?
`
`m.
`
`9Qmm.mo.w
`
`m.
`\.
`
`o N
`
`3.GE
`
`ommdnm<m
`
`
`
`”8632.0.m<xmmmm.m+xntxmr.83:n>
`
`D
`
`xs4¢
`
`Emésae
`
`

`

`US. Patent
`
`Aug. 12, 1997
`
`Sheet 14 of 19
`
`5,656,286
`
`0.?
`
` Mkmum
`
`
`mmwdnN<mAxmvmmmd.V<oFk,m+mmomo.vu>
`md06m.moflm
`
`m.\.
`
`o.\.
`
`oom
`
`com
`
`03
`
`Ni38\=8VEEEEEE338
`
`
`
`Hzm_o_n_n_mooszDHEE
`
`3mm\N<E3
`
`
`
`

`

`US. Patent
`
`A
`
`n,
`
`.bw
`
`mnm
`
`56.,
`
`600
`
`3mdszfi
`
`5asVm2:
`
`.8ESao
`
`0.,5555mm4.3$36D3$2530
`
`&3
`w.3
`7ESE\9:mEmdszxwv3:NEE:
` .2.SE
`
`m:
`
`a0.0
`
`

`

`596569286
`
`FIG.17
`
`
`
`
`
`mmmmmmmmm
`OOOOOOOOO
`
`

`

`Sheet 17 0f 19
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`18
`FIG.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`NNNNNNN
`OOOOOOO
`
`
`
`
`

`

`

`

`US. Patent
`
`Aug. 12, 1997
`
`Sheet 19 of 19
`
`5,656,286
`
`mmmm
`
`2“
`
`Ae;vm2:
`
`vN
`
`5m._ms_<xm
`\
`
`mvm._n=>_<xw
`
`\
`
`
`
`§Nmum
`
`
`
`vs:55<Emm
`
`2535033
`
`

`

`1
`SOLUBILITY PARAMETER BASED DRUG
`DELIVERY SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR
`ALTERING DRUG SATURATION
`CONCENTRATION
`
`CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED
`APPLICATION
`
`This application is a continuation-in-part of Ser. No.
`07/722,342 filed Jun. 27, 1991, now U.S. Pat. No. 5,474,783,
`which application is a continuation-in—part of PCT applica-
`tion PCT/US90/01750 filed Mar. 28, 1990, and filed nation-
`ally as U.S. Ser. No. 671,709 on Apr. 2, 1991, now U.S. Pat.
`No. 5,300,291; which in turn is a continuation-in-part of
`U.S. patent application Ser. No. 295,847, filed Jan. 11, 1989,
`now U.S. Pat. No. 4,994,267 issued Feb. 19, 1991; which is
`a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No.
`164,482, filed Mar. 4, 1988 now U.S. Pat. No. 4,814,168,
`granted Mar. 21. 1989 all of which patents and applications
`are hereby incorporated by reference. All applications and
`patents are assigned to Noven Pharmaceuticals, Inc. of
`Miami, Fla.
`
`BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
`
`This invention relates generally to transdermal drug deliv-
`ery systems, and more particularly. to a transdermal drug
`delivery composition wherein a blend of polymers is utilized
`to afi'ect the rate of drug delivery from the composition.
`More specifically, a plurality of polymers including a soluble
`polyvinylpyrrolidone having differing solubility parameters,
`preferably immiscible with each other, adjusts the solubility
`of the drug in a polymeric adhesive system formed by the
`blend, affects the maximum concentration of the drug in the
`system, and modulates the delivery of the drug from the
`composition and through the dermis.
`The use of a transdermal composition, for example a
`pressure—sensitive adhesive containing a medicament,
`namely, a drug, as a means of controlling drug delivery
`through the skin at essentially a constant rate, is well known.
`Such known delivery systems involve incorporation of a
`medicament into a carrier such as a polymeric matrix and/or
`a pressure-sensitive adhesive formulation. The pressure-
`sensitive adhesive must adhere effectively to the skin and
`permit migration of the medicament from the carrier through
`the sldn and into the bloodstream of the patient.
`Drug concentration in a monolithic transdermal delivery
`system can vary widely depending on the drug and polymers
`used. For example. certain drugs are effective in low doses
`and therefore the transdermal formulation may involve low
`concentrations, illustratively 5% or less by weight of the
`medicament
`in an adhesive. Other drugs, such as
`nitroglycerin. require large doses to be efiective and the
`transdermal formulation therefore may involve high drug
`concentrations. approximately between 5 to 40% or more by
`weight in an adhesive. Low concentrations of medicament
`typically do not critically affect the adhesion, tack, and shear
`resistance properties of the adhesive. However. low drug
`concentrations in the adhesive can result in difficulties in
`
`achieving an acceptable delivery rate of the medicament.
`High concentrations, on the other hand, frequently affect the
`adhesion properties of the adhesives. The deleterious effects
`are particularly exacerbated by drugs which also act as
`plasticizers or solvents for the polymeric adhesive (e.g.,
`nitroglycerin in polyacrylates).
`There is a need in the art for an adhesive composition for
`transdermal drug delivery systems which can selectably
`incorporate low concentrations of drug and deliver same at
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`40
`
`45
`
`50
`
`55
`
`60
`
`65
`
`5,656,286
`
`2
`
`an adequate and controlled rate or incorporate high concen-
`trations of drugs while retaining good physical adhesive
`properties.
`In transdermal drug delivery systems, the presence of
`crystals (drugs and/or additives) is generally undesirable. If
`the drug is present in crystalline form, it is not available for
`release from the system, and therefore not available for
`delivery. Moreover, although drug crystals can first dissolve
`and then release from the system, such a process is usually
`rate-limiting and tends to reduce delivery.
`Crystal size and distribution thus become important
`parameters which must be controlled in order to control
`delivery. These parameters are, however, usually difficult to
`control. Failure to control crystal size and distribution can
`result in products whose appearance suggests that the manu-
`facturing process by which they are produced is not under
`control. More importantly, the presence of large crystals,
`particularly in excessive amounts, can be detrimental to
`adhesive-type transdermals. Crystals on the surface of the
`adhesive system can result in loss of tack. Furthermore,
`surface crystals can come into direct contact with the skin,
`and could cause skin irritation.
`
`There is a need in the art for an adhesive composition for
`transdermal delivery systems which can prevent or suppress
`crystallization of drugs therein.
`It is, therefore. an object of this invention to provide a
`transdermal drug delivery system wherein the rate of drug
`delivery from the transdermal composition may be select-
`ably modulated.
`It is another object of this invention to provide a trans-
`dermal drug delivery system wherein the rate of drug
`delivery from the transdermal composition may be select-
`ably modulated by adjusting the solubility and/or diifusivity
`of the drug in the multiple polymer adhesive system.
`It is also an object of this invention to provide a trans-
`dermal drug delivery system wherein the multiple polymer
`adhesive system is simple to manufacture.
`It is a further object of this invention to provide a
`transdermal drug delivery system wherein drug-loading of a
`multiple polymer adhesive system may be selectably varied
`without adverse effects on drug delivery rate and adhesive
`properties. such as adhesion, tack, and shear resistance.
`It is additionally an object of this invention to provide a
`transdermal drug delivery system wherein a novel multiple
`polymer adhesive system is provided which has desirable
`physical properties.
`
`SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
`
`The foregoing and other objects are achieved by this
`invention which provides a transdermal drug delivery sys-
`tem wherein a blend of at least two polymers, or at least one
`polymer and a soluble polyvinylpyrrolidone permits
`increased loading of a drug and adjusts the solubility of a
`drug in the blend and thereby modulates the delivery of the
`drug from the system and through the dermis.
`In accordance with one aspect of the invention, an
`improved pressure—sensitive adhesive composition of the
`type which is suitable as a matrix for controlled release of a
`drug therefrom comprises a blend of a rubber—based
`pressure-sensitive adhesive and a soluble polyvinylpyrroli-
`done (PVP).
`The term “polyvinylpyrrolidone,” or “PVP” refers to a
`polymer, either a homopolymer or copolymer, containing
`N—vinylpyrrolidone as the monomeric unit Typical PVP
`polymers are homopolymeric PVPs and the copolymer vinyl
`
`

`

`5 ,656,286
`
`3
`acetate vinylpyrrolidone. The homopolymeric PVPs are
`known to the pharmaceutical industry under a variety of
`designations including Povidone, Polyvidone,
`Polyvidonum, Polyvidonum solubile, and Poly(l-vinyl-2-
`pyrrolidone). The copolymer vinyl acetate vinylpyrrolidone
`is known to the pharmaceutical industry as Copolyvidon,
`Copolyvidone, and Copolyvidonum.
`The term “soluble” when used with reference to PVP
`means that the polymer is soluble in water and generally is
`not substantially cross—linked, and has a molecular weight of
`less than about 2,000,000. See, generally. Biihler, KOLLI—
`DON®: POLYVINYLPRYRROLIDONE FOR THE
`PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRY, BASF Aktiengesell—
`schaft (1992).
`It has been surprisingly found that use of a soluble PVP
`results in the ability to form a film that does not contain
`particles of insoluble PVP and in the ability to employ
`higher concentrations of drug without resulting in increased
`crystallization of the drug.
`In accordance with another embodiment of the invention,
`an improved pressure-sensitive adhesive composition of the
`type which is suitable as a matrix for controlled release of a
`drug therefrom comprises a blend of a rubber-based
`pressure-sensitive adhesive having a first solubility
`parameter, a polyacrylate polymer having a second solubil-
`ity parameter, and a soluble PVP,
`the first and second
`solubility parameters preferably being different from one
`another by an increment of at least 2 (J/cm3)1/2. The blend,
`therefore, has a characteristic net solubility parameter.
`In accordance with further embodiment of the invention,
`an improved pressure-sensitive adhesive composition of the
`type which is suitable as a matrix for controlled release of a
`drug therefrom comprises a blend of a rubber—based
`pressure-sensitive adhesive having a first solubility
`parameter. and a polyacrylate polymer having a second
`solubility parameter. the first and second solubility param-
`eters preferably being diflerent from one another by an
`increment of at least 2 (J/cm3)1’2. The blend, therefore, has
`a characteristic net solubility parameter.
`Particularly preferred embodiments include binary blends
`comprising a rubber—based pressure— sensitive adhesive and a
`soluble PVP, wherein the rubber-based pressure-sensitive
`adhesive is a polysiloxane. Polysiloxane is preferably
`present in the pressure-sensitive adhesive composition in an
`amount ranging from about 9% to about 97% by weight of
`the total pressure-sensitive adhesive composition.
`Other particularly preferred embodiments include ternary
`blends comprising a rubber—based pressure-sensitive
`adhesive, a polyacrylate polymer, and a soluble PVP,
`wherein the rubber—based pressure-sensitive adhesive is a
`polysiloxane. Polysiloxane is preferably present
`in the
`pressure-sensitive adhesive composition in an amount rang—
`ing from about 9% to about 97% by weight of the total
`pressure—sensitive adhesive composition, while the poly—
`acrylate polymer is preferably present in an amount ranging
`from about 5% to about 85%. Preferably. the ratio of the
`polyacrylate polymer to the rubber—based pressure—sensitive
`adhesive is from about 2:98 to about 96:4, and more
`preferably from about 2:98 to about 86:14 by weight.
`Other particularly preferred embodiments include blends
`comprising a rubber—based pressure—sensitive adhesive and a
`polyacrylate polymer, wherein the rubber-based pressure-
`sensitive adhesive is a polysiloxane. Polysiloxane is prefer—
`ably present in the pressure-sensitive adhesive composition
`in an amount ranging from about 9% to about 97% by
`weight of the total pressure-sensitive adhesive composition.
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`4s
`
`50
`
`55
`
`65
`
`4
`While the polyacrylate polymer is preferably present in an
`amount ranging from about 5% to about 85 %. Preferably. the
`ratio of the polyacrylate polymer to the rubber-based
`pressure-sensitive adhesive is from about 2:98 to about 96:4,
`and more preferably from about 2:98 to about 086:14 by
`weight.
`In both binary and ternary blends, soluble PVP is prefer—
`ably present in the pressure-sensitive adhesive composition
`in an amount ranging from about 1% to about 20% by
`weight of the total pressure-sensitive adhesive composition.
`The pres sure-sensitive adhesive compositions may further
`include enhancers, fillers, co—solvents, and excipients as are
`known in the art for use in such compositions.
`In a dermal adhesive composition embodiment of the
`invention, a multiple polymer adhesive system comprises a
`blend of 14—94% by weight of a rubber-based pressure-
`sensitive adhesive, 5—85% by weight of a polyacrylate
`polymer, and 2—10% by weight of a soluble PVP, and the
`multiple polymer adhesive system comprises about 50-99%
`by weight of the dermal adhesive composition. This multiple
`polymer adhesive system is combined with a drug in the
`amount of O.1—50% by weight of the total dermal adhesive
`composition. Optional additives. such as co-solvent for the
`drug (up to 30% by weight) and enhancers (up to 20% by
`weight) may be included in the dermal adhesive composi-
`tion.
`
`In transdermal drug delivery system embodiments, incor-
`porating a drug in the improved pressure-sensitive adhesive
`composition, the characteristic net solubility parameter can
`be preselected to adjust the saturation concentration of the
`drug in the composition and thereby control the release of
`the drug. The saturation concentration of the drug may be
`adjusted either upward or downward depending upon
`whether the rate of release is to be enhanced or retarded.
`
`the drug is
`In particularly preferred embodiments,
`asteroid, such as an estrogen or a progestational agent, or
`combination thereof. In other preferred embodiments. the
`drug may be a fiz—adrenergic agonist, such as albuterol, or a
`cardioactive agent, such as nitroglycerin.
`In still other
`embodiments,
`the drug is a cholinergic agent, such as
`pilocarpine, or an antipsychotic such as haloperidol or a
`tranquilizer/sedative such as alprazolam.
`The transdermal drug delivery system may comprise a
`monolithic adhesive matrix device in some embodiments.
`The transdermal drug delivery system may further include a
`backing material and a release liner as is known in the art.
`The saturation concentration of a drug in a transdermal
`drug delivery system of the type having a drug-containing
`pressure—sensitive adhesive diffusion matrix is adjusted in
`accordance with an aspect of the present invention by
`blending at least two polymers having difiering solubility
`parameters as defined above to form a pressure-sensitive
`adhesive difl’usion matrix having a net solubility parameter
`which modifies the delivery rate of the drug from the
`pressure-sensitive adhesive diflusion matrix and through the
`dermis.
`
`BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
`
`Comprehension of the invention is facilitated by reading
`the following detailed description, in conjunction with the
`annexed drawing, in which:
`FIG. 1 is a schematic illustration of a monolithic trans-
`dermal drug delivery device of the present invention;
`FIG. 2 is a graphic representation of the steady-state
`nitroglycerin flux rates through cadaver skin in vitro from a
`
`

`

`5 ,656,286
`
`5
`transdermal drug delivery composition of the present inven-
`tion (formulation of Example 1) and two commercially-
`available nitroglycerin-containing transdermal delivery
`devices: Transderm-Nitro® (a trademark of Ciba-Geigy
`Corporation. Surmnit, N.J.), and Nitro-Dur® (a trademark of
`Key Pharmaceuticals, Inc, Kenilworth, NJ);
`FIG. 3 is a graphical representation which summarizes in
`vitro nitroglycerin flux results through cadaver skin for the
`polymeric systems of Examples 2—5. The composition of
`Example 2 (polyacrylate-only adhesive) is compared to the
`multiple polymer compositions of Examples 3. 4, and 5, in
`which the polyacrylate is blended with an ethylene vinyl
`acetate. a polyisobutylene, and a polysiloxane, respectively;
`FIG. 4 is a graphical representation of the steady-state
`nitroglycerin flux through cadaver skin in vitro from a
`multiple polymer transdermal adhesive system of Example
`6 comprising various weight ratios of polyacrylate and
`polysiloxane;
`FIG. 5 is a graphical representation of steady-state estra-
`diol flux through cadaver skin in vitro fi‘om the drug delivery
`systems of the prior art. specifically single polymeric adhe-
`sives of silicone and acrylic, as compared to a multiple
`polymer transdermal adhesive system (polyacrylate/
`polysiloxane) of the present invention;
`FIG. 6 is a graphical representation of average estradiol
`flux through cadaver skin in vitro from 0 to 22 hours and
`from 22 to 99 hours for a multiple polymer transdermal
`adhesive system comprising various weight ratios of poly-
`acrylate and polysiloxane;
`FIG. 7 is a graphical representation of steady-state nore-
`thindrone acetate flux through cadaver skin in vitro from the
`drug delivery systems of the prior art. specifically single
`polymeric adhesives of silicone and acrylic. as compared to
`a multiple polymer transdermal adhesive system
`(polyacrylate/polysiloxane) of the present invention;
`FIG. 8 is a graphical representation of average estradiol
`and norethindrone acetate flux through cadaver skin in vitro
`for a multiple polymer transdermal adhesive system com-
`prising both drugs and various weight ratios of polyacrylate
`and polysiloxane;
`FIG. 9 is a graphical representation showing the ratio of
`average estradiol to norethindrone acetate flux (estradiol flux
`divided by norethindrone acetate flux) through cadaver skin
`in vitro for a multiple polymer transdermal adhesive system
`comprising various weight ratios of polyacrylate and pol-
`ysiloxanc;
`FIG. 10 is a graphical representation of steady-state flux
`of pilocarpine through cadaver skin in vitro from the drug
`delivery systems of the prior art, specifically single poly-
`meric adhesives of silicone and acrylic. as compared to a
`multiple polymer transdermal adhesive system
`(polyacrylate/polysiloxane) of the present invention;
`FIG. 11 is a graphical representation of steady-state
`albuterol and nitroglycerin flux through cadaver skin in vitro
`from multiple polymer transdermal adhesive systems
`(polyacrylate/polysiloxane) of the present
`invention
`(Examples 24—27). and Nitro—Dur®, respectively;
`FIG. 12 is a graphical representation of steady-state
`estradiol flux through cadaver skin in vitro from two difier—
`ent multiple polymer transdermal adhesive systems
`polyacrylate/polysiloxane and polyacrylate/polybutylene;
`FIGS. 13 and 14 show the relationship of flux rate (J)
`plotted against apparent diffusion coeflicient (D) and net
`solubility parameter (SP), respectively. for Compositions
`I—VI of Example 6. The net solubility parameter. SP,” was
`
`6
`calculated using a weighted average of the solubility param-
`eters of the individual polymers comprising the matrix:
`
`SPMFIDPSSPP,+¢WSPW,
`
`where Q” is the weight percentage of polysiloxane and SPF:
`is the solubility parameter of polysiloxanc. The subscript
`“pa” refers to the polyacrylate;
`FIG. 15 is a plot of diifusion coefficient versus net
`solubility parameter;
`FIG. 16 shows the average flux of estradiol for two
`compositions of this invention containing a soluble PVP;
`FIG. 17 shows estradiol flux through the human epidermis
`from a PVP—containing compositions of this invention;
`FIG. 18 shows norethindrone flux through human epider—
`mis in a composition of this invention containing estradiol
`and soluble PVP;
`FIG. 19 shows average estradiol and norethindrone
`acetate flux from a composition of this invention containing
`varying concentrations of soluble PVP; and
`FIG. 20 shows the effect of soluble PVP on estradiol flux
`through human epidermis.
`
`DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF PREFERRED
`EMBODIMENTS
`
`In one aspect of the present invention, a pressure— sensitive
`adhesive composition is provided which comprises a blend
`of at least two polymers and a soluble PVP, and a drug. The
`blend of at least two polymers is herein referred to as a
`multiple polymer adhesive system. The term “blend” is used
`herein to mean that there is no, or substantially no, chemical
`reaction or cross-linking (other than simple H—bonding)
`between the dilferent polymers in the multiple polymer
`adhesive system.
`As used herein, the term ‘pressure-sensitive adhesive”
`refers to a Viscoelastic material which adheres instanta-
`neously to most substrates with the application of very slight
`pressure and remains permanently tacky. A polymer is a
`pressure-sensitive adhesive within the meaning of the term
`as used herein if it has the properties of a pressure-sensitive
`adhesive per se or functions as a pressure-sensitive adhesive
`by admixture with tackifiers, plasticizers or other additives.
`The term pressure-sensitive adhesive also includes mix-
`tures of different polymers and mixtures of polymers, such
`as polyisobutylenes (PIB), of difierent molecular weights,
`wherein each resultant mixture is a pressure-sensitive. In the
`last case, the polymers of lower molecular weight in the
`mixture are not considered to be “tackifiers,” said term being
`reserved for additives which diifer other than in molecular
`weight from the polymers to which they are added.
`> As used herein, the term “rubber—based pressure-sensitive
`adhesive” refers to a Viscoelastic material which has the
`properties of a pressure-sensitive adhesive and which con-
`tains at least one natural or synthetic elastomeric polymer.
`As used herein,
`the term “drug.” and its equivalent,
`“bioactive agent,” is intended to have its broadest interpre-
`tation as any therapeutically, prophylactically and/or phar-
`macologically or physiologically beneficial active
`substance, or mixture thereof, which is delivered to a living
`organism to produce a desired, usually beneficial, effect.
`More specifically, any drug which is capable of producing
`a pharmacological response. localized or systemic, irrespec-
`tive of whether therapeutic, diagnostic. or prophylactic in
`nature, in plants or animals is within the contemplation of
`the invention. Also within the contemplation of the inven-
`tion are such bioactive agents as pesticides. insect repellents,
`sun screens. cosmetic agents. etc. It should be noted that the
`drugs and/or bioactive agents may be used singly or as a
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`4o
`
`45
`
`50
`
`55
`
`65
`
`

`

`5,656,286
`
`7
`mixture of two or more such agents. and in amounts suffi-
`cient to prevent. cure, diagnose or treat a disease or other
`condition. as the case may be.
`The multiple polymer adhesive not only functions as a
`carrier matrix for the drug. but enhances the rate of release
`of the drug. and hence the transdermal permeation rate. In
`some embodiments of the invention, however, the multiple
`polymer adhesive system will function to retard the trans—
`dermal permeation rate.
`A soluble PVP is blended with one or more other poly-
`mers in order to further modulate the transdermal perme-
`ation rate of the drug.
`invention is the
`An important aspect of the present
`discovery that the transderrnal permeation rate of a drug
`from the multiple polymer adhesive system can be selec-
`tively modulated by adjusting the solubility of the drug in
`the device. As used herein. the term “transdermal perme-
`ation rate” means the rate of passage of the drug through the
`skin; which. as known in the art. may or may not be affected
`by the rate of release of the drug from the carrier.
`The polymers comprising the multiple polymer adhesive
`system are preferably inert to the drug. and are preferably
`immiscible with each other. as can be surmised by their
`different solubility parameters. Forming a blend of multiple
`polymers results in an adhesive system having a character-
`istic “net solubility parameter,” the selection of which
`advantageously permits a selectable modulation of the deliv-
`ery rate of the drug by adjusting the solubility of the drug in
`the multiple polymer adhesive system
`Solubility parameter. also referred to herein as “SP.” has
`been defined as the sum of all the intermolecular attractive
`forces. which are empirically related to the extent of mutual
`solubility of many chemical species. A general discussion of
`solubility parameters is found in an article by Vaughan,
`“Using Solubility Parameters in Cosmetics Formulation, ” J.
`Soc. Cosmet. Chem. V0136. pages 319—333 (1985). Many
`methods have been developed for the determination of
`solubility parameters. ranging from theoretical calculations
`to totally empirical correlations. The most convenient
`method is Hildebrand’s method. which computes the solu-
`bility parameter from molecular weight. boiling point and
`density data. which are commonly available for many mate-
`rials and which yields values which are usually within the
`range of other methods of calculation:
`
`SP=(AE./V)”2.
`
`where V=molecu1ar weight/density and AEV=energy of
`vaporization.
`Alternatively written. SP=(AHJV—RTN)1’2 where AH,.=
`heat of vaporization. R=gas constant. and T is the absolute
`temperature. °K. For materials. such as high molecular
`weight polymers. which have vapor pressures too low to
`detect. and thus for which AHV is not available, several
`methods have been developed which use the summation of
`atomic and group contributions to AHV:
`AHvzlliAh‘.
`
`where Ahi is the contribution of the ith atom or group to the
`molar heat of vaporization. One convenient method has been
`proposed by R. F. Fedors. Polymer Engineering and
`Science. Vol. 14. p. 147 (1974). In this method AEvand V are
`be obtained by simply assuming that
`AEv=EiAei and V=Zi ui. where Ae‘ and V. are the additive
`atomic and group contributions for the energy of vapor-
`ization and molar volume. respectively.
`Yet another method of calculating the solubility parameter
`of a material is described by Small. J. Applied Chem. Vol. 3,
`p. 71 (1953).
`
`8
`Table I—A below sets forth solubility parameters of some
`exemplary adhesive polymers which would be useful in the
`practice of the invention and shows the variation of SP with
`molecular weight. free —~OH and —COOH grou s, the
`degree of cross—linking. Table IA is in (cal/cm3) ’2 and
`(j/cm3)1/2 as calculated by Small’s method.
`
` TABLE IA
`Solubili
`' Parameter
`
`Polymers
`
`Addition polymers of
`unsaturated esters
`
`Polymetliyl methacrylate
`Polyethylmethacrylate
`Polymethylacrylate
`Polyethylacrylate
`Hydrocarbon polymers
`
`Polyethylene
`Polystyrene
`Polyisobutylene
`Polyisoprene
`Polybutadiene
`Polyethylene/butylene
`Halogen-containing polymers
`
`Polytetrafluoroethylene
`Polyvinylchloride
`Polyvinylidene chloride
`Polychloroprene
`Polyacrylonitrile
`Condensation polymers
`
`Nylon—66
`Epon resin 1004 (epoxy)
`Polysiloxanes
`
`Polydimethylsiloxane
`Copolymers
`
`(cal/cm3)1’Z
`
`(I/cm3)“2
`
`9.3
`9. 1
`9.7
`9.2
`
`8.1
`9.1
`7.7
`8.1
`8.4
`7.9
`
`6.2
`9.5
`12.2
`9.4
`12.7
`
`13.6
`9.7
`
`7.3
`
`'
`
`19.0
`18.6
`19.8
`18.8
`
`16.6
`18.6
`15.7
`16.6
`16.6
`16.2
`
`12.7
`19.4
`24.9
`19.2
`26.0
`
`27.8
`19.8
`
`14.9
`
`Polybutadienero-acrylonitrile:
`75/25 to 70/30
`Polybutadiene-co-styrene:
`17.4
`8.5
`75/25 to 72/28
`
`
`9.25
`
`18.9
`
`excerpted from Kraton ® Thermoplastic Rubber Shell Chemical Co. Product
`Brochure Number SC

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket