throbber
Efficacy and safety of tavaborole topical solution,
`5%, a novel boron-based antifungal agent,
`for the treatment of toenail onychomycosis:
`Results from 2 randomized phase-III studies
`
`Boni E. Elewski, MD,a Raza Aly, PhD,b Sheryl L. Baldwin, RN,c Remigio F. Gonzalez Soto, MD,d
`Phoebe Rich, MD,e Max Weisfeld, DPM,f Hector Wiltz, MD, CPI,g
`Lee T. Zane, MD,d and Richard Pollak, DPM, MSh
`Birmingham, Alabama; San Francisco and Palo Alto, California; Monterrey, Mexico;
`Portland, Oregon; Baltimore, Maryland; Miami, Florida; and San Antonio, Texas
`
`Background: Onychomycosis, a fungal nail infection, can impact quality of life.
`
`Objective: We sought to evaluate the efficacy and safety of tavaborole topical solution, 5% for treatment of
`toenail onychomycosis.
`
`Methods: In 2 phase-III trials, adults with distal subungual onychomycosis affecting 20% to 60% of a target
`great toenail were randomized 2:1 to tavaborole or vehicle once daily for 48 weeks. The primary end point
`was complete cure of the target great toenail (completely clear nail with negative mycology) at week 52.
`Secondary end points included completely or almost clear nail, negative mycology, completely or almost
`clear nail plus negative mycology, and safety.
`
`Results: Rates of negative mycology (31.1%-35.9% vs 7.2%-12.2%) and complete cure (6.5% and 9.1% vs
`0.5% and 1.5%) significantly favored tavaborole versus vehicle (P # .001). Completely or almost clear nail
`rates also significantly favored tavaborole versus vehicle (26.1%-27.5% vs 9.3%-14.6%; P \ .001). Rates of
`completely or almost clear nail plus negative mycology (15.3%-17.9% vs 1.5%-3.9%) were significantly
`greater for tavaborole versus vehicle (P \ .001). Application-site reactions with tavaborole included
`exfoliation (2.7%), erythema (1.6%), and dermatitis (1.3%).
`
`Limitations: Duration of follow-up is a limitation.
`
`From the Department of Dermatology, University of Alabama at
`Birminghama; Department of Dermatology, University of
`California, San Franciscob; Anacor Pharmaceuticals,
`Inc, Palo
`Altoc; Centro de Dermatologia de Monterreyd; Oregon Health
`and Science Universitye; Hamilton Foot Care, Baltimoref; FXM
`Research Corp, Miamig; and Endeavor Clinical Trials, San
`Antonio.h
`Writing and editorial assistance was provided by Callie Grimes of
`Peloton Advantage, LLC, Parsippany, NJ, and was supported by
`Anacor Pharmaceuticals,
`Inc. Diane Nelson of Anacor
`Pharmaceuticals, Inc, provided critical review and revision of
`the manuscript.
`Disclosure: Ms Baldwin and Dr Zane are employees of Anacor
`Pharmaceuticals,
`Inc. Dr Elewski has received honoraria and
`grants while serving as a consultant and investigator with the
`following companies: Anacor Pharmaceuticals,
`Inc; Valeant
`Pharmaceuticals International Inc, Bridgewater, NJ; and Meiji
`Seika Pharma Co, Ltd, Tokyo, Japan. Dr Aly was consultant and
`investigator for Anacor Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Dr Gonzalez Soto
`was an investigator
`for
`the following companies: Anacor
`Pharmaceuticals,
`Inc; Pfizer, New York, NY; and Eli Lilly,
`Indianapolis,
`IN. Dr Rich was the principal
`investigator for
`onychomycosis studies with the following companies: Anacor
`
`62
`
`Inc; Topica Pharmaceuticals, Los Altos, CA;
`Pharmaceuticals,
`Valeant Pharmaceuticals
`International
`Inc;
`and Viamet
`Pharmaceuticals Inc, Durham, NC. Dr Pollak has received grants
`and honoraria while serving as advisory board member,
`investigator, and speaker for the following companies: Anacor
`Pharmaceuticals, Inc; Valeant Pharmaceuticals International Inc;
`and Topica Pharmaceuticals. Drs Weisfeld and Wiltz were
`principal
`investigators for Anacor Pharmaceuticals,
`Inc. The
`authors were fully responsible for
`the content, editorial
`decisions, and opinions expressed in the current article. No
`author received an honorarium related to the development of
`this manuscript.
`Accepted for publication April 6, 2015.
`Reprint requests: Boni E. Elewski, MD, Department of Dermatology,
`University of Alabama at Birmingham, EFH 414, 1530 3rd Ave S,
`Birmingham, AL 35294-0009. E-mail: beelewski@aol.com.
`Published online May 5, 2015.
`0190-9622
`Ó 2015 by the American Academy of Dermatology, Inc. Published
`by Elsevier, Inc. This is an open access article under the CC
`BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-
`nd/4.0/).
`http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2015.04.010
`
`FlatWing Ex. 1039, p. 1
`
`

`

`J AM ACAD DERMATOL
`VOLUME 73, NUMBER 1
`
`Elewski et al 63
`
`Conclusion: Tavaborole demonstrates a favorable benefit-risk profile in treatment of toenail onychomy-
`cosis. ( J Am Acad Dermatol 2015;73:62-9.)
`
`Key words: antifungal agents; arthrodermataceae; nails; onychomycosis; randomized controlled trial;
`tavaborole.
`
`CAPSULE SUMMARY
`
`d Tavaborole topical solution, 5% is
`approved for treatment of toenail
`onychomycosis.
`
`Tavaborole topical solu-
`tion, 5% (Anacor Pharmaceu-
`ticals, Inc, Palo Alto, CA) is a
`novel, boron-based pharma-
`ceutical approved by the Food
`and Drug
`Administration
`(FDA)
`in July
`2014
`for
`the
`treatment
`of
`toenail
`onychomycosis
`caused by
`Trichophyton rubrum and T
`mentagrophytes.1 Tavaborole
`represents a new class of phar-
`maceutical antifungal agents
`with a novel chemical structure
`and mechanism of action
`(Fig 1).2-5 Tavaborole targets
`fungal
`cytoplasmic
`leucyl-
`transfer ribonucleic acid (tRNA) synthetase, a member
`of a family of aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase enzymes
`essential for protein synthesis.5 These enzymes maintain
`and translate genetic code within DNA, and possess a
`proofreading mechanism that corrects enzymatic
`mistakes that occur on a separate, active editing site.
`Tavaborole binds to the editing site via its boron atom to
`trap leucyl
`tRNA, preventing its catalytic turnover
`and inhibiting protein synthesis. Tavaborole demon-
`strates broad-spectrum antifungal activity and more
`than 1000-fold greater
`selectivity for
`the fungal
`leucyl-tRNA synthase than the mammalian leucyl-tRNA
`synthetase6; T rubrumand T mentagrophytes isolates
`collected from clinical
`trial patients have not
`demonstrated resistance after repeated exposure to
`tavaborole.1
`The low molecular weight of tavaborole allows a
`high amount of penetration through full-thickness
`human nail plates.7 Ex vivo permeation studies have
`demonstrated
`tavaborole penetration
`through
`multiple layers of nail polish (data on file, Anacor
`Pharmaceuticals, Inc; TER-002-14, ANA-005, 2013).
`Phase-I
`trials showed favorable safety and low
`systemic
`exposure
`in patients with
`toenail
`onychomycosis,8
`and phase-II
`trials provided
`evidence of
`improved clear nail growth and
`negative fungal cultures.9 The objective of the 2
`phase-III trials described herein was to evaluate
`the efficacy and safety of
`tavaborole versus
`vehicle in adults with distal subungual
`toenail
`onychomycosis.
`
`METHODS
`Study treatment and
`patients
`inclu-
`Study treatments
`ded tavaborole and vehicle,
`which were applied topically
`to the affected nails once
`daily for 48 weeks by the
`patient. Patients were in-
`structed to apply a sufficient
`amount of study treatment
`on,
`under,
`and
`around
`the infected target great
`toenail (TGT) and infected
`nontarget
`toenails with a
`thin, even layer.
`Patients 18 years of age or
`older with distal subungual toenail onychomycosis
`involving 20% to 60% of at least 1 TGT were eligible if
`they had a positive potassium hydroxide (KOH) wet
`mount and positive culture for dermatophytes,
`greater than or equal to 3-mm clear nail measured
`from the proximal nail fold to the most proximal
`visible mycotic border, and distal TGT thickness
`3 mm or
`less. Patients were excluded if
`they
`had proximal
`subungual or
`superficial white
`onychomycosis, severe disease, dermatophytoma,
`exclusively lateral disease, yellow/brown spikes,
`coinfection with nondermatophyte fungi, anatomic
`abnormalities of the toes or toenails, active tinea
`pedis (involving the sides or back of
`the foot,
`interdigital, or plantar) requiring treatment, history
`of chronic moccasin-type tinea pedis (involving the
`sides or back of the foot), history of other significant
`chronic fungal disease, psoriasis,
`lichen planus,
`known immunodeficiency, significant peripheral
`vascular disease, known structural heart disease, or
`uncontrolled diabetes (hemoglobin A1C $8%).
`Patients who used topical antifungals on the toenails
`within 4 weeks or systemic antifungals within
`24 weeks were also excluded. Recent use of other
`topical agents on the toe or toenails, systemic
`corticosteroids, or immunomodulatory agents was
`not permitted.
`
`d Tavaborole was significantly more
`effective than vehicle in treating toenail
`onychomycosis in 2 phase-III trials;
`incidence of treatment-related
`application-site reactions was low.
`
`d The favorable benefit-risk profile makes
`tavaborole a reasonable therapeutic
`option for toenail onychomycosis.
`
`Study design
`Two phase-III, multicenter, randomized, double-
`blind, vehicle-controlled, parallel-group trials of
`
`FlatWing Ex. 1039, p. 2
`
`

`

`64 Elewski et al
`
`J AM ACAD DERMATOL
`JULY 2015
`
`Abbreviations used:
`
`AE:
`FDA:
`KOH:
`TEAE:
`TGT:
`tRNA:
`
`adverse event
`Food and Drug Administration
`potassium hydroxide
`treatment-emergent adverse event
`target great toenail
`transfer ribonucleic acid
`
`identical design were conducted: 1 at 27 sites in the
`United States and Mexico from December 2010 to
`November 2012 (study 1; NCT01270971) and the
`other at 32 sites in the United States and Canada from
`February
`2011
`to
`January
`2013
`(study
`2;
`NCT01302119). Both studies were conducted in
`accordance with ethical principles originating in
`the Declaration of Helsinki and in compliance with
`the principles of Good Clinical Practice and all
`applicable regulatory requirements. The study
`protocol was approved by an institutional review
`board/independent ethics committee at each site,
`and all patients provided written informed consent.
`Patients were screened 4 to 10 weeks before
`randomization. Eligible patients were randomized
`2:1 to receive tavaborole or vehicle, and applied
`study treatment to the TGT and all other affected
`toenails once daily for 48 weeks. Nail debridement
`was not permitted.
`Disease involvement was assessed at screening,
`baseline (day 1), week 2, week 6, and every 6 weeks
`thereafter. At
`these visits, nail
`trimming of
`the
`TGT was limited to within 1 mm distal
`to the
`hyponychium or distal groove if needed. Patients
`were encouraged not to trim the TGT. All other
`toenails were also evaluated for
`the presence
`of onycholysis and subungual hyperkeratosis.
`Subungual samples were obtained from the TGT at
`screening and every 12 weeks during treatment and
`sent to a central mycology laboratory for KOH wet
`mount examination with calcofluor white stain and
`fungal culture to identify pathogenic fungi including
`dermatophyte
`species. After
`study
`treatment
`was completed at week 48,
`follow-up efficacy
`assessments were made at week 52.
`
`Efficacy
`The primary efficacy end point was complete cure
`of the TGT defined as completely clear nail and
`negative mycology at week 52. Secondary end points
`included completely or almost clear nail of the TGT,
`negative mycology of the TGT, and completely or
`almost clear nail plus negative mycology, each
`determined at week 52. Completely clear nail was
`defined as no clinical evidence of onychomycosis
`based on a normal toenail plate, no onycholysis, and
`
`Fig 1. Tavaborole chemical structure. Tavaborole is a
`novel, boron-based pharmaceutical approved for the
`treatment of toenail onychomycosis caused by Trichophy-
`ton rubrum and T mentagrophytes.1 Tavaborole inhibits
`leucyl-tRNA-synthetase, resulting in inhibition of fungal
`protein synthesis and termination of fungal cell growth.5
`
`no subungual hyperkeratosis. Almost clear nail was
`defined as no more than minimal evidence of
`onychomycosis based on a toenail plate that was
`dystrophic or discolored on 10% or less of the distal
`aspect, with minimally evident onycholysis and
`subungual hyperkeratosis. Negative mycology was
`defined as negative KOH wet mount and negative
`fungal culture.
`
`Safety
`Safety assessments were conducted at each
`visit, as was a physical examination evaluating
`the frequency and severity of application-site
`reactions:
`burning/stinging,
`induration/edema,
`oozing/crusting, pruritus, erythema, and scaling.
`Adverse events
`(AEs),
`treatment-emergent AEs
`(TEAEs), serious AEs, vital signs, laboratory parame-
`ters, and electrocardiographic parameters were
`monitored throughout the study.
`
`Statistics
`Efficacy parameters were evaluated in the
`intent-to-treat population, which included all
`randomized patients who received study treatment.
`Safety parameters were evaluated in all randomized
`patients who received at
`least 1 dose of study
`treatment and had at least 1 postbaseline assessment.
`Comparisons between treatment groups for the
`primary and secondary efficacy end points were
`made using the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
`test
`stratified by analysis. A last-observation-carried-
`forward approach was used to impute missing
`efficacy data. Two-sided hypothesis testing was
`conducted using a significance level of .05. AEs
`were classified using the Medical Dictionary for
`
`FlatWing Ex. 1039, p. 3
`
`

`

`J AM ACAD DERMATOL
`VOLUME 73, NUMBER 1
`
`Elewski et al 65
`
`Fig 2. Toenail onychomycosis. Patient disposition. ITT, Intent-to-treat.
`
`Regulatory Activities (Version 13.1, http://www.
`meddra.org). All safety parameters were summarized
`descriptively by treatment group.
`
`RESULTS
`Patients
`The disposition of patients (study 1, N = 594; study
`2, N = 604) is depicted in Fig 2. Demographic
`and clinical characteristics of
`the intent-to-treat
`population were similar between treatment groups
`and generally consistent across the 2 trials (Table I).
`
`Efficacy
`Tavaborole was significantly more effective than
`vehicle for all primary and secondary efficacy end
`points, and produced higher rates of negative culture
`and negative KOH at week 52 versus vehicle (Table
`II). A significantly greater proportion of patients
`achieved complete cure of the TGT at week 52
`with tavaborole versus vehicle in study 1 (6.5% vs
`0.5%; P = .001) and study 2 (9.1% vs 1.5%; P \.001).
`Rates of completely or almost clear nail at week 52
`with tavaborole were 26.1% and 27.5% in study 1 and
`study 2, respectively, versus 9.3% and 14.6% with
`vehicle (both P \ .001). Negative mycology rates
`
`with tavaborole were 31.1% and 35.9% in study 1 and
`study 2, respectively, versus 7.2% and 12.2% with
`vehicle (both P \ .001). Photographs illustrating a
`case with complete cure and a case of almost clear
`nail with negative mycology are shown in Fig 3.
`The onset of
`tavaborole clinical activity was
`evident by week 24 and generally increased through
`the end of treatment at week 48 and the final efficacy
`assessment at week 52 (Fig 4). Complete cure of the
`TGT was observed as early as week 24 in study 2 and
`at week 30 in study 1. Negative culture rates ranged
`from 95% at week 24 to 87% at week 52 in study 1 and
`94% at week 24 to 85% at week 52 in study 2.
`Negative KOH rates mirrored negative mycology
`data.
`
`Safety
`The incidence of TEAEs with tavaborole versus
`vehicle was similar in study 1 (64.4% vs 69.9%,
`respectively)
`and study 2 (57.5% vs 54.0%,
`respectively) (Table III). Most TEAEs in patients
`receiving tavaborole (95.5%) or vehicle (93.4%)
`were reported as mild or moderate in severity. The
`most common treatment-related application site
`TEAEs with tavaborole in the 2 trials combined
`
`FlatWing Ex. 1039, p. 4
`
`

`

`66 Elewski et al
`
`J AM ACAD DERMATOL
`JULY 2015
`
`Table I. Demographics and baseline characteristics of the intent-to-treat population
`
`Characteristic
`
`Tavaborole (n = 399)
`
`Vehicle (n = 194)
`
`Tavaborole (n = 396)
`
`Vehicle (n = 205)
`
`Study 1
`
`Study 2
`
`Age, y
`Mean (SD)
`Range
`Gender, n (%)
`Male
`Female
`Race
`White
`Black
`American Indian/Alaska Native
`Asian
`Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander
`Other
`Country
`United States
`Canada
`Mexico
`No. of nontarget toenails $10%
`affected by onychomycosis
`Mean (SD)
`Range
`
`53.6 (12.5)
`18-88
`
`324 (81.2)
`75 (18.8)
`
`316 (79.2)
`19 (4.8)
`0 (0)
`2 (0.5)
`0 (0)
`62 (15.5)
`
`340 (85.2)
`—
`59 (14.8)
`
`53.4 (12.3)
`19-81
`
`158 (81.4)
`36 (18.6)
`
`152 (78.4)
`12 (6.2)
`0 (0)
`0 (0)
`0 (0)
`30 (15.5)
`
`164 (84.5)
`—
`30 (15.5)
`
`55.5 (11.5)
`20-81
`
`323 (81.6)
`73 (18.4)
`
`355 (89.6)
`21 (5.3)
`2 (0.5)
`11 (2.8)
`2 (0.5)
`5 (1.3)
`
`315 (79.5)
`81 (20.5)
`—
`
`55.4 (11.0)
`27-81
`
`174 (84.9)
`31 (15.1)
`
`183 (89.3)
`14 (6.8)
`1 (0.5)
`2 (1.0)
`1 (0.5)
`4 (2.0)
`
`165 (80.5)
`40 (19.5)
`—
`
`3.4 (2.8)
`0-9
`
`3.8 (2.7)
`0-9
`
`3.3 (2.8)
`0-9
`
`3.3 (2.6)
`0-9
`
`Table II. Efficacy end points at week 52
`
`End point
`
`Primary end point
`Complete cure of TGT*
`Secondary end points
`Completely CN or almost CN of TGT
`Negative mycology of TGT
`Completely or almost CN plus negative
`mycology of the TGT
`Other end points
`Negative culture of TGT
`Negative KOH of TGT
`Completely CN or almost CN of TGT
`with negative culture
`
`Tavaborole
`(n = 399)
`n (%)
`
`Study 1
`
`Vehicle
`(n = 194)
`n (%)
`
`Tavaborole
`(n = 396)
`n (%)
`
`P value
`
`Study 2
`
`Vehicle
`(n = 205)
`n (%)
`
`26 (6.5)
`
`1 (0.5)
`
`.001
`
`36 (9.1)
`
`3 (1.5)
`
`104 (26.1)
`124 (31.1)
`61 (15.3)
`
`18 (9.3)
`14 (7.2)
`3 (1.5)
`
`\.001
`\.001
`\.001
`
`109 (27.5)
`142 (35.9)
`71 (17.9)
`
`30 (14.6)
`25 (12.2)
`8 (3.9)
`
`P value
`
`\.001
`
`\.001
`\.001
`\.001
`
`347 (87.0)
`128 (32.1)
`98 (24.6)
`
`93 (47.9)
`17 (8.8)
`11 (5.7)
`
`—
`—
`—
`
`338 (85.4)
`147 (37.1)
`100 (25.3)
`
`105 (51.2)
`35 (17.1)
`19 (9.3)
`
`—
`—
`—
`
`CN, Clear nail; KOH, potassium hydroxide wet mount; TGT, target great toenail.
`*Completely CN and negative mycology.
`
`were exfoliation (2.7%), erythema (1.6%), and
`dermatitis (1.3%). The majority of TEAEs were
`considered not related or unlikely related to study
`treatment. The incidence of
`treatment-related
`TEAEs was higher with tavaborole versus vehicle
`in study 1 (8.8% vs 2.6%, respectively) and study 2
`(3.3% vs 0.5%, respectively) and was attributed to a
`higher rate of application-site reactions with tava-
`borole versus vehicle in study 1 (7.3% vs 0.5%,
`
`0%,
`(3.0% vs
`2
`study
`and
`respectively)
`respectively). Rates of discontinuations as a result
`of AEs occurred at similar rates between treatment
`groups (Table III).
`There were no deaths in either study. Serious AEs
`were reported in 19 patients (2.4%) who received
`tavaborole and 10 patients (2.5%) who received
`vehicle; none were considered treatment-related.
`Results of clinical laboratory and vital assessments
`
`FlatWing Ex. 1039, p. 5
`
`

`

`J AM ACAD DERMATOL
`VOLUME 73, NUMBER 1
`
`Elewski et al 67
`
`Fig 3. Toenail onychomycosis. Illustrative cases of complete cure of the target great toenail
`(top) and almost clear nail with negative mycology (bottom) after treatment with tavaborole for
`48 weeks. KOH, Positive potassium hydroxide wet mount.
`
`identify any safety signals, and no
`did not
`drug-related
`effects were
`observed
`on
`the
`electrocardiograms.
`
`DISCUSSION
`These findings from 2 phase-III trials demonstrate
`that once-daily tavaborole, without adjunctive
`debridement, is effective, safe, and well tolerated in
`the treatment of toenail onychomycosis. Tavaborole
`was significantly more effective than vehicle for all
`primary and secondary end points at week 52, with
`26% to 28% of patients achieving completely or
`almost clear nail; 31% to 36% achieving negative
`mycology; 7% to 9% achieving complete cure; and
`15% to 18% achieving completely or almost clear nail
`and negative mycology. The primary efficacy end
`point of complete cure (0% involvement of the nail
`plate and negative mycology) was chosen to enhance
`objectivity and is currently a regulatory standard for
`assessing the efficacy of antifungal agents for the
`treatment of toenail onychomycosis. The safety and
`efficacy of tavaborole was demonstrated in both adult
`and geriatric patients with a varied degree of disease
`severity, as the phase-III clinical trials enrolled patients
`
`aged 18 to 88 years with up to 60% clinical involvement
`of the TGT. Complete cure rates may not reflect the
`full clinical benefit of tavaborole. Although completely
`clear nail represents a definitive clinical cure, an
`(#10% affected)
`almost clear nail
`represents a
`clinically meaningful and successful outcome for
`many patients, and is likely the most realistically
`achievable outcome considering the residual nail
`defects that remain after the infection is cured.
`The number of TEAEs reported with tavaborole
`was low. Treatment-related TEAEs were localized
`to the application site;
`the most common were
`exfoliation, dermatitis, and erythema (1.3%-2.7%).
`Rates of discontinuations as a result of TEAEs were
`low and comparable with vehicle. Thus, tavaborole
`offers a favorable safety and tolerability profile.
`Tavaborole is a clear, colorless solution that is easy to
`apply, dries quickly, and does not require adjunctive
`debridement or removal of prior applications.
`The clinical efficacy and safety of tavaborole is
`supported by its ability to penetrate the nail plate,
`owing to its small size (152 d), hydrophilicity, and
`ability to retain pharmacologic antifungal activity in
`the presence of keratin.6 In ex vivo nail studies,
`
`FlatWing Ex. 1039, p. 6
`
`

`

`68 Elewski et al
`
`J AM ACAD DERMATOL
`JULY 2015
`
`Fig 4. Tavaborole efficacy in toenail onychomycosis. Change in efficacy end points over time
`from weeks 24 to 52. Each panel shows the percentage of patients achieving the end point at
`the indicated time point: complete cure (A); completely clear nail (CN ) or almost CN (B);
`negative mycology (C); completely or almost CN plus negative mycology (D); and negative
`culture (E). *P # .001 for tavaborole vs vehicle at week 52 for each of the end points assessed.
`Vertical lines indicate end of treatment at 48 weeks. Negative mycology was defined as negative
`potassium hydroxide wet mount and negative fungal culture. TGT, Target great toenail.
`
`FlatWing Ex. 1039, p. 7
`
`

`

`J AM ACAD DERMATOL
`VOLUME 73, NUMBER 1
`
`Table III. Summary of adverse events
`
`Adverse event
`Patients with $1 TEAEs
`Most common TEAEs*
`Tinea pedis
`Nasopharyngitis
`Upper respiratory tract infection
`Back pain
`Ingrowing nail
`Sinusitis
`Hypertension
`Influenza
`Headache
`Muscle strain
`y
`Most common application site TEAEs
`Exfoliation
`Dermatitis
`Erythema
`Pain
`Hematoma
`Discontinuations as a result of TEAEs
`
`Elewski et al 69
`
`Study 1
`
`Study 2
`
`Tavaborole (n = 396)
`n (%)
`
`Vehicle (n = 193)
`n (%)
`
`Tavaborole (n = 395)
`n (%)
`
`Vehicle (n = 202)
`n (%)
`
`255 (64.4)
`
`135 (69.9)
`
`227 (57.5)
`
`109 (54.0)
`
`42 (10.6)
`23 (5.8)
`20 (5.1)
`17 (4.3)
`14 (3.5)
`12 (3.0)
`11 (2.8)
`11 (2.8)
`10 (2.5)
`8 (2.0)
`
`16 (4.0)
`8 (2.0)
`7 (1.8)
`5 (1.3)
`2 (0.5)
`1 (0.3)
`
`35 (18.1)
`10 (5.2)
`8 (4.1)
`3 (1.6)
`1 (0.5)
`5 (2.6)
`8 (4.1)
`10 (5.2)
`5 (2.6)
`1 (0.5)
`
`1 (0.5)
`0 (0)
`0 (0)
`1 (0.5)
`1 (0.5)
`2 (1.0)
`
`53 (13.4)
`27 (6.8)
`18 (4.6)
`7 (1.8)
`6 (1.5)
`6 (1.5)
`11 (2.8)
`2 (0.5)
`11 (2.8)
`10 (2.5)
`
`5 (1.3)
`2 (0.5)
`6 (1.5)
`3 (0.8)
`3 (0.8)
`2 (0.5)
`
`25 (12.4)
`16 (7.9)
`12 (5.9)
`2 (1.0)
`0 (0)
`5 (2.5)
`4 (2.0)
`0 (0)
`7 (3.5)
`6 (3.0)
`
`0 (0)
`0 (0)
`0 (0)
`0 (0)
`2 (1.0)
`1 (0.5)
`
`TEAE, Treatment-emergent adverse event.
`*Occurring in $3% of patients in any treatment group.
`y
`Occurring in $1% of patients in any treatment group.
`
`tavaborole effectively penetrated the nail plate and
`achieved concentrations above the minimum fungi-
`cidal concentration.6,8 Tavaborole application once
`daily for 28 days to the toenails of patients with
`onychomycosis resulted in nail drug concentrations
`substantially above the minimum concentration
`required to inhibit 90% of isolates (minimal inhibi-
`tory concentration90) of T rubrum.8 Tavaborole nail
`concentrations were 20 times higher
`than the
`minimum fungicidal concentration against
`the
`dermatophytes 3 months after the end of treatment.
`Tavaborole demonstrated nail penetration 40-fold
`greater than ciclopirox after 14 days of application in
`a human cadaver fingernail model.10
`In conclusion,
`these studies demonstrate that
`tavaborole, a novel, first-in-class, boron-based
`pharmaceutical approved by the FDA for
`the
`treatment of toenail onychomycosis, has a favorable
`benefit-risk profile and is an attractive option for the
`treatment of onychomycosis of the toenail as a result
`of dermatophytes.
`
`REFERENCES
`1. Kerydin [package insert]. Palo Alto, CA: Anacor Pharmaceuti-
`cals, Inc; 2014.
`
`[package insert]. East Hanover, NJ: Novartis Phar-
`2. Lamisil
`maceuticals Corp; 2013.
`3. Sporanox capsules [package insert]. Titusville, NJ: Janssen
`Pharmaceuticals, Inc; 2012.
`4. Penlac [package insert]. Bridgewater, NJ: Dermik Laboratories,
`a division of Sanofi-Aventis US LLC; 2006.
`5. Rock FL, Mao W, Yaremchuk A, et al. An antifungal agent
`inhibits an aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase by trapping tRNA in
`the editing site. Science. 2007;316:1759-1761.
`6. Barak O, Loo DS. AN-2690, a novel antifungal for the topical
`treatment of onychomycosis. Curr Opin Investig Drugs. 2007;8:
`662-668.
`7. Hui X, Baker SJ, Wester RC, et al. In vitro penetration of a novel
`oxaborole antifungal (AN2690) into the human nail plate. J
`Pharm Sci. 2007;96:2622-2631.
`8. Hold KM, Sanders V, Bu W, et al. Nail penetration and nail
`concentration of AN2690, a novel broad-spectrum antifungal
`agent
`in development
`for
`the topical
`treatment of
`onychomycosis. Poster presented at the Annual Meeting of
`the American Association of Pharmaceutical Scientists;
`October 29-November 2, 2006; San Antonio, TX.
`tavaborole
`9. Zane LT, Pollak RA. Safety and efficacy of
`(formerly AN2690), a novel boron-based molecule, in phase
`2 trials for the topical treatment of toenail onychomycosis.
`Poster presented at the Annual Scientific Meeting of the
`American Podiatric Medical Association; August 16-19, 2012;
`Washington, DC.
`the treatment of
`10. Elewski BE, Tosti A. Tavaborole for
`onychomycosis.
`Expert Opin
`Pharmacother.
`2014;15:
`1439-1448.
`
`FlatWing Ex. 1039, p. 8
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket