throbber
REPORTS
`
` on April 11, 2017
`
`http://science.sciencemag.org/
`
`Downloaded from
`
`of the nine mutants exhibited an editing defect
`based on their sensitivity to the structurally re-
`lated noncognate amino acid norvaline (fig. S1).
`These results suggest that the editing pocket of
`Cdc60p is the binding site for AN2690.
`To delineate its mode of action, we inves-
`tigated the effect of AN2690 on the ability of
`LeuRS to hydrolyze mischarged tRNALeu. Ad-
`dition of AN2690 to the posttransfer editing
`assay inhibited the hydrolysis of Ile-tRNALeu in
`a dose-dependent manner (Fig. 1B). In addition,
`we found that AN2690 inhibited tRNA amino-
`acylation (fig. S2A), and, as would be expected
`for a LeuRS inhibitor, it blocked protein syn-
`thesis in vivo (fig. S2B). Initial aminoacylation
`experiments also revealed that AN2690 required
`the presence of tRNA for effective inhibition of
`aminoacylation activity. Kinetic analysis of
`aminoacylation inhibition showed that AN2690
`acted as a noncompetitive inhibitor with respect
`to both adenosine triphosphate (ATP) and leu-
`cine (fig. S3, A and B). Analysis of the noncom-
`petitive nature of AN2690 revealed that
`the
`inhibition constant (Ki) decreased on increas-
`ing AN2690’s incubation time with tRNA and
`Cdc60p, before initiating the aminoacylation
`reaction with ATP. When enzyme and tRNA
`were incubated with AN2690 for 2 min, the Ki
`was 31.4 ± 2.8 (SEM) mM, whereas after a 20-
`min incubation the Ki decreased to 1.85 ± 0.1
`mM (fig. S3). To better understand this
`process, we measured inhibition of amino-
`acylation as a function of incubation time and
`AN2690 concentration (Fig. 2A). We found a
`direct linear relationship between the observed
`rates of inactivation (kobs) and AN2690 concen-
`trations, with no apparent plateau even at the
`highest concentration tested (fig. S4). From
`these data, we deduced a rate of inactivation of
`−1
`the enzyme (kinactivation) of 0.66 ± 0.10 min
`
`An Antifungal Agent Inhibits an
`Aminoacyl-tRNA Synthetase by
`Trapping tRNA in the Editing Site
`Fernando L. Rock,1* Weimin Mao,1* Anya Yaremchuk,2,3 Mikhail Tukalo,2,3
`Thibaut Crépin,2 Huchen Zhou,1,4 Yong-Kang Zhang,1 Vincent Hernandez,1
`Tsutomu Akama,1 Stephen J. Baker,1 Jacob J. Plattner,1 Lucy Shapiro,5
`Susan A. Martinis,6 Stephen J. Benkovic,7 Stephen Cusack,2 M. R. K. Alley1†
`
`Aminoacyl–transfer RNA (tRNA) synthetases, which catalyze the attachment of the correct amino
`acid to its corresponding tRNA during translation of the genetic code, are proven antimicrobial
`drug targets. We show that the broad-spectrum antifungal 5-fluoro-1,3-dihydro-1-hydroxy-2,1-
`benzoxaborole (AN2690), in development for the treatment of onychomycosis, inhibits yeast
`cytoplasmic leucyl-tRNA synthetase by formation of a stable tRNALeu-AN2690 adduct in the editing
`site of the enzyme. Adduct formation is mediated through the boron atom of AN2690 and the 2′-
`and 3′-oxygen atoms of tRNA’s 3′-terminal adenosine. The trapping of enzyme-bound tRNALeu in
`the editing site prevents catalytic turnover, thus inhibiting synthesis of leucyl-tRNALeu and
`consequentially blocking protein synthesis. This result establishes the editing site as a bona fide
`target for aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase inhibitors.
`
`induced AN2690-resistant mutants in the yeast
`Saccharomyces cerevisiae (7). These genetically
`dominant mutants were 32- to 512-fold more re-
`sistant to AN2690 than the parental S. cerevisiae
`strain (table S2), and their resistance mutations
`were found to lie in the CDC60 gene, which en-
`codes the cytoplasmic LeuRS (Cdc60p). Further-
`more, all AN2690-resistant mutations mapped
`to the editing domain (Fig. 1A and table S2)
`and all but two, Cys326 → Arg326 (C326R) and
`Cys326 → Phe326 (C326F) (8), to the two highly
`conserved regions that form the editing active
`site of LeuRS (9). Four mutations lie in the
`threonine-rich region, a locus known in bacterial
`LeuRS homologs to be involved in binding and
`hydrolyzing mischarged tRNAs (9–12). Seven
`
`Aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases (AARSs)
`
`perform a pivotal role in translating the
`genetic code by catalyzing the attach-
`ment of the correct amino acid to its cognate
`tRNA (1). The aminoacylation reaction occurs
`in two steps: the formation of an enzyme-bound
`aminoacyl-adenylate, followed by transfer of this
`activated amino acid to either the 2′- or 3′-hydroxy
`group on the 3′-terminal adenosine of tRNA. The
`accuracy of the tRNA aminoacylation reaction is
`critical to ensuring the fidelity of the genetic code
`(2). To achieve this accuracy, many AARS en-
`zymes possess a proofreading (editing) mechanism
`that hydrolyzes tRNAs aminoacylated with the in-
`correct amino acid (3). Leucyl-tRNA synthetase
`(LeuRS) is a proofreading AARS, which pos-
`sesses distinct synthetic (aminoacylation) and edit-
`ing active sites separated by more than 30 Å (4, 5).
`We show that 5-fluoro-1,3-dihydro-1-hydroxy-
`2,1-benzoxaborole (AN2690) inhibits LeuRS by
`trapping tRNALeu in the editing active site.
`AN2690 is a member of a new class of
`broad-spectrum antifungals (table S1), the ben-
`zoxaboroles, which have an unusual chemical
`attribute: a boron atom (6). We isolated sponta-
`neous and ethyl-methanesulfonate (EMS)–
`
`1Anacor Pharmaceuticals, Incorporated, 1060 East Meadow
`Circle, Palo Alto, CA 94303, USA. 2European Molecular Biol-
`ogy Laboratory, Grenoble Outstation 6 rue Jules Horowitz,
`BP181, 38042 Grenoble Cedex 9, France. 3Institute of Mo-
`lecular Biology and Genetics, National Academy of Science
`(NAS) of Ukraine, 252627 Kiev, 3143, Ukraine. 4School of
`Pharmacy, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 800 Dongchuan
`Road, Shanghai 200240, China. 5Department of Develop-
`mental Biology, Beckman Center, Stanford University
`School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA. 6Depart-
`ment of Biochemistry, University of Illinois, Urbana,
`IL
`61801–3732, USA. 7Department of Chemistry, Pennsylva-
`nia State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA.
`*These authors contributed equally to this work.
`†To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail:
`dalley@anacor.com
`
`Fig. 1. (A) S. cerevisiae AN2690 resistance mutations in the editing active site of Cdc60p (8). Align-
`ment of the conserved regions of the LeuRS editing domains from S. cerevisiae (Sce) from
`CAA97865, Pyrococcus horikoshii (Pho) from O58698, Escherichia coli (Eco) from AAC73743, and T.
`thermophilus (Tth) from BAD69984. The amino acid substitutions that confer resistance in S.
`cerevisiae to AN2690 are in black (table S2). (B) AN2690 inhibits posttransfer editing. Deacylation
`of total brewer’s yeast tRNA mischarged with isoleucine, no enzyme control (circles), enzyme control
`(squares), Cdc60p treated with 6 mM AN2690 (triangles), and enzyme treated with 66 mM AN2690
`(asterisks). All reactions were performed in triplicate, and the mean values were plotted. The SD for
`each point was less than 4%.
`
`www.sciencemag.org SCIENCE VOL 316
`
`22 JUNE 2007
`
`1759
`
`FlatWing Ex. 1037, p. 1
`
`

`

` on April 11, 2017
`
`http://science.sciencemag.org/
`
`Downloaded from
`
`sistent with AN2690 being characterized as a
`slow-tight-binding inhibitor.
`Equilibrium dialysis demonstrated that
`adenosine-containing ribonucleotides were essen-
`tial for measurable binding of AN2690 to
`Cdc60p (fig. S6A). To determine more precisely
`the mode of action of AN2690, we obtained a
`3.5 Å crystallographic structure of Thermus
`thermophilus LeuRS complexed with tRNALeu
`and AN2690 (Fig. 3A). Significant positive
`difference density found in the editing site (fig.
`S7) was interpreted as a tRNA-AN2690 adduct
`with the boron from the oxaborole ring bound to
`the 2′,3′-hydroxy groups on the 3′-terminal
`adenosine (A76). A 1.85 Å resolution structure
`of an adenosine monophosphate (AMP)–
`AN2690 adduct bound in the editing site of
`LeuRS (Fig. 3B) confirmed this tetrahedral
`spiroborate structure, whose configuration is
`stabilized by two hydrogen bonds to the
`conserved threonine-rich peptide and a water
`molecule (Fig. 3C). These results show that AMP
`the 3′-terminal
`can act as a surrogate for
`adenosine of tRNALeu, as in our direct binding
`assay, and that AN2690 occupies the noncognate
`amino acid–binding pocket in the editing site.
`The adenosine and the 2′-hydroxy group of
`the AMP-AN2690 adduct can be exactly over-
`laid on the analogous groups of a posttransfer
`editing substrate analog, 2′-(L-norvalyl) amino-
`2′-deoxyadenosine (Nva2aa), bound in the edit-
`ing site (9). However, the planar benzoxaborole
`only partially overlaps with the noncognate amino
`acid (Fig. 3D). In particular, AN2690 has no
`equivalent of the amino acid amino group, and
`the absence of any associated strong interactions
`with the enzyme probably explains why the
`compound has very low affinity for the editing
`site in the absence of AMP or tRNA.
`Because benzoxaboroles can bind to the cis-
`diols of sugars (13, 14), we tested the require-
`ment for adenosine’s 2′- and 3′-hydroxy groups
`in AN2690 binding to Cdc60p and found that
`both hydroxy groups were required (fig. S6C).
`This implies that AN2690 can only form an
`
`REPORTS
`
`(fig. S5). Measurement of the rate of recovery
`demonstrated that AN2690’s inactivation of
`Cdc60p was reversible, albeit with a very slow
`
`
`−4reactivation rate of 1.64 × 10−4 ± 0.15 × 10
`
`
`min−1 (Fig. 2B), which corresponds to a half-life
`of 424 min. These kinetic properties are con-
`
`Fig. 2. (A) The rate of Cdc60p inactivation by AN2690. The percentage of inhibition from different
`concentrations [3.3 mM (squares), 5 mM (triangles), 6.6 mM (asterisk), 9.9 mM (open diamonds), and
`16.5 mM (circles)] of AN2690 were plotted versus the time of incubation. All reactions were performed
`in triplicate, and the mean values were plotted. (B) The recovery of Cdc60p activity from AN2690 inhibi-
`tion. All reactions were performed in triplicate, and the mean values were plotted. The data were fitted to a
`first-order exponential decay.
`
`Fig. 3. AN2690 forms an adduct with the terminal adenosine (A76) of tRNALeu in the editing active site
`of LeuRS. (A) Overall structure of the complex of T. thermophilus LeuRS with tRNALeu and AN2690,
`showing the adenosine-AN2690 adduct (ball-and-stick model, ringed in red) in the editing site and
`leucine (space-filling model) in the synthetic site. The editing domain is cyan; the catalytic domain, yellow;
`Zn-1 domain, purple; the leucyl-specific insertion domain, black; the anticodon-binding domain, red; the
`C-terminal domain, gold; zinc atoms, gray spheres; and tRNA, blue tube. (B) Unbiased difference map
`(1.85 Å resolution) for the AMP-AN2690 adduct in the editing site. (C) Diagram showing water molecules
`(dark blue spheres) and hydrogen bonds (green dotted lines) between editing site residues of LeuRS and
`the AMP-AN2690 adduct (orange). Amino acid residues that are mutated in the S. cerevisiae AN2690-
`resistant mutants are labeled and colored in purple (table S2). The atoms are colored accordingly: boron,
`mauve; fluorine, green; oxygen, red; nitrogen, light blue; carbon, yellow; and phosphate, purple. (D)
`Superposition of bound posttransfer editing substrate analog (Nva2AA, brown) (9) and the AMP-AN2690
`adduct (orange) obtained after superposing the Ca positions of the editing domain of each complex.
`
`Fig. 4. Boron and the oxaborole ring are re-
`quired for inhibition of aminoacylation. All reac-
`tions were performed in triplicate, and the mean
`values were used to determine a median inhib-
`itory concentration (IC50) with Prism 4 (17).
`
`1760
`
`22 JUNE 2007 VOL 316 SCIENCE www.sciencemag.org
`
`FlatWing Ex. 1037, p. 2
`
`

`

`REPORTS
`
` on April 11, 2017
`
`http://science.sciencemag.org/
`
`Downloaded from
`
`adduct with nonaminoacylated tRNA: The free
`3′ end of the bound tRNA must sample the
`editing site before aminoacylation for AN2690
`to inhibit LeuRS (fig. S8). This is the
`configuration observed in the T. thermophilus
`LeuRS-tRNALeu crystal structure (15).
`The requirement for boron and the oxaborole
`ring in aminoacylation inhibition was tested
`by using various AN2690 analogs (Fig. 4). Ex-
`panding the oxaborole ring to form a ben-
`zoxaborin, compound A, adversely affected
`its ability to inhibit the aminoacylation reac-
`tion (Fig. 4). Because the ring-opened boronic
`acids are known also to bind to tRNA (16),
`we tested compounds B, C, and D. Each was
`found to be inactive, further demonstrating the
`importance of the oxaborole ring (Fig. 4).
`Lastly, the compounds E and F, where boron is
`replaced with a sp2 or sp3 carbon, were inactive,
`showing that boron cannot simply be replaced
`by carbon (Fig. 4).
`This work demonstrates that AN2690 is a
`highly specific inhibitor of LeuRS and that the
`boron atom in the oxaborole ring is essential for
`AN2690’s unique mechanism of inhibition. With
`appropriate compounds, the oxaborole tRNA
`
`trapping (OBORT) mechanism could be used
`to inhibit other AARS enzymes that perform
`posttransfer editing. Therefore, the incorpora-
`tion of a boron atom into rationally designed
`enzyme inhibitors represents a promising ap-
`proach to the discovery of new classes of
`therapeutic agents.
`
`References and Notes
`1. M. Ibba, D. Soll, Annu. Rev. Biochem. 69, 617 (2000).
`2. T. L. Hendrickson, P. Schimmel, in Transfer RNA-Dependent
`Amino Acid Discrimination by Aminoacyl-tRNA Synthetase,
`J. P. D. Lapointe, L. Brakier-Gingras, Eds., Translation
`mechanisms (Landes Bioscience/Eurekah.com, Austin, TX,
`2003), pp. 34–64.
`3. P. Schimmel, E. Schmidt, Trends Biochem. Sci. 20,
`1 (1995).
`4. S. Cusack, A. Yaremchuk, M. Tukalo, EMBO J. 19, 2351
`(2000).
`5. R. Fukunaga, S. Yokoyama, J. Mol. Biol. 346, 57
`(2005).
`6. S. J. Baker et al., J. Med. Chem. 49, 4447 (2006).
`7. Materials and methods are available on Science Online.
`8. Single-letter abbreviations for the amino acid residues
`are as follows: A, Ala; C, Cys; D, Asp; E, Glu; F, Phe;
`G, Gly; H, His; I, Ile; L, Leu; M, Met; N, Asn; P, Pro;
`Q, Gln; R, Arg; S, Ser; T, Thr; V, Val; W, Trp; and Y, Tyr.
`9. T. L. Lincecum Jr. et al., Mol. Cell 11, 951 (2003).
`10. Y. Zhai, S. A. Martinis, Biochemistry 44, 15437
`(2005).
`
`11. M. G. Xu, J. Li, X. Du, E. D. Wang, Biochem. Biophys. Res.
`Commun. 318, 11 (2004).
`12. R. S. Mursinna, T. L. Lincecum Jr., S. A. Martinis,
`Biochemistry 40, 5376 (2001).
`13. M. Dowlut, D. G. Hall, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 128, 4226
`(2006).
`14. A. Ricardo et al., J. Org. Chem. 71, 9503 (2006).
`15. M. Tukalo, A. Yaremchuk, R. Fukunaga, S. Yokoyama,
`S. Cusack, Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 12, 923 (2005).
`16. T. F. McCutchan, P. T. Gilham, D. Soll, Nucleic Acids Res.
`2, 853 (1975).
`17. GraphPad, GraphPad Software, Incorporated.
`18. We thank M. Kully and J. Khan at NAEJA Pharmaceuticals,
`Incorporated, for their contribution to the minimal
`inhibitory concentrations in table S1. Part of this work
`was funded by an NIH grant awarded
`to J.J.P. (R01 DE16835). The coordinates for LeuRSTT:
`tRNA:AN2690 and LeuRSTT:AMP:AN2690 have been
`deposited in the Protein Data Bank as 2V0G and 2V0C.
`S.J.B. and L.S. are co-founders and members of the
`board of Anacor Pharmaceuticals, Incorporated. S.C.
`and S.A.M. have received honoraria and/or consulting
`fees from Anacor Pharmaceuticals, Incorporated.
`Supporting Online Material
`www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/316/5832/1759/DC1
`Materials and Methods
`Figs. S1 to S9
`Tables S1 to S3
`References
`6 March 2007; accepted 23 May 2007
`10.1126/science.1142189
`
`www.sciencemag.org SCIENCE VOL 316
`
`22 JUNE 2007
`
`1761
`
`FlatWing Ex. 1037, p. 3
`
`

`

` on April 11, 2017
`
`http://science.sciencemag.org/
`
`Downloaded from
`
`An Antifungal Agent Inhibits an Aminoacyl-tRNA Synthetase
`by Trapping tRNA in the Editing Site
`Fernando L. Rock, Weimin Mao, Anya Yaremchuk, Mikhail
`Tukalo, Thibaut Crépin, Huchen Zhou, Yong-Kang Zhang, Vincent
`Hernandez, Tsutomu Akama, Stephen J. Baker, Jacob J. Plattner,
`Lucy Shapiro, Susan A. Martinis, Stephen J. Benkovic, Stephen
`Cusack and M. R. K. Alley (June 22, 2007)
`316
` (5832), 1759-1761. [doi: 10.1126/science.1142189]
`Science 
`
`Editor's Summary
`
`This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use only.
`
`Article Tools
`
`Visit the online version of this article to access the personalization and
`article tools:
`http://science.sciencemag.org/content/316/5832/1759
`
`Permissions
`
`Obtain information about reproducing this article:
`http://www.sciencemag.org/about/permissions.dtl
`
`(print ISSN 0036-8075; online ISSN 1095-9203) is published weekly, except the last week
`Science
`in December, by the American Association for the Advancement of Science, 1200 New York
`Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20005. Copyright 2016 by the American Association for the
` is a registered trademark of AAAS.
`Advancement of Science; all rights reserved. The title
`Science
`
`FlatWing Ex. 1037, p. 4
`

`   
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket