throbber
Expert Opinion on Investigational Drugs
`
`ISSN: 1354-3784 (Print) 1744-7658 (Online) Journal homepage: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/ieid20
`
`Recent progress on the topical therapy of
`onychomycosis
`
`Michael RK Alley, Stephen J Baker, Karl R Beutner & Jacob Plattner
`
`To cite this article: Michael RK Alley, Stephen J Baker, Karl R Beutner & Jacob Plattner (2007)
`Recent progress on the topical therapy of onychomycosis, Expert Opinion on Investigational Drugs,
`16:2, 157-167, DOI: 10.1517/13543784.16.2.157
`
`To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1517/13543784.16.2.157
`
`Published online: 24 Jan 2007.
`
`Submit your article to this journal
`
`Article views: 227
`
`View related articles
`
`Citing articles: 6 View citing articles
`
`Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at
`http://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=ieid20
`
`Download by: [UCSF Library]
`
`Date: 17 April 2017, At: 15:36
`
`FlatWing Ex. 1036, p. 1
`
`

`

`1. Introduction
`
`2. Description of onychomycosis
`
`3. Challenges to the therapy of
`onychomycosis
`
`4. Drugs currently approved for
`onychomycosis in the main
`markets
`
`5. New antifungal compounds in
`development for onychomycosis
`
`6. Discovery and characterization
`of AN-2690
`
`7. Clinical summary
`
`8. Expert opinion
`
`Review
`
`Anti-Infectives
`
`Recent progress on the topical
`therapy of onychomycosis
`Michael RK Alley, Stephen J Baker, Karl R Beutner & Jacob Plattner†
`†Anacor Pharmaceuticals, 1060 East Meadow Circle, Palo Alto, CA 94303, USA
`
`Onychomycosis is a fungal infection of the fingernails and toenails that
`results in thickening, discoloration, splitting of the nails and lifting of the nail
`from the nail bed. The disease is caused by dermatophytes and has a high
`incidence within the general population, especially among older individuals.
`Present treatment options include both oral and topical drugs, with oral
`therapies giving better outcomes; however, neither of these treatment
`options provides high cure rates that are durable. The difficulty in treating
`onychomycosis results from the deep-seated nature of the infection within
`the nail unit (nail plate, nail bed and surrounding tissue) and the inability of
`drugs to effectively reach all sites. Ongoing drug development activities have
`focused on novel delivery technologies to facilitate penetration of existing
`antifungal drugs through the nail plate and on the discovery of inherently
`penetrable antifungals. AN-2690 represents an oxaborole antifungal that is
`designed to penetrate the nail plate and is showing promising results in
`clinical trials.
`
`Keywords: antifungal agent, dermatophyte, fungal infection, leucyl-tRNA synthetase,
`nail penetration, onychomycosis, oxaborole, tinea unguium
`
`Expert Opin. Investig. Drugs (2007) 16(2):157-167
`
`1. Introduction
`
`Onychomycosisis is a progressive fungal infection of the nail unit that leads to the
`destruction and deformity of toenails and (less frequently) fingernails. This con-
`dition is common and represents ∼ 50% of all nail disorders. Onychomycosis has a
`high occurrence throughout the world, with recent epidemiological data indicat-
`ing a prevalence of 6.5 – 13.8% in North America [1]. The infection shows an
`increasing incidence in older individuals and 1 study reported that 48% of people
`[2]. The susceptibility to
`aged 70 years are infected with onychomycosis
`onychomycosis is higher in men than in women, although women seek medical
`treatment more frequently.
`The infection is caused by fungi that infect the nail unit (the nail bed, the nail
`plate and surrounding tissue) and these include yeasts, dermatophytes and other
`molds. By far the most common fungi that cause onychomycosis are the dermato-
`phytes, which account for ∼ 90% of all cases. Dermatophytes are also the cause of
`skin fungal infections [3] and many patients with a nail infection also have a co-exist-
`ing skin infection. The Trichophyton spp., Microsporum spp. and Epidermophyton
`spp. are the main causative dermatophytes, with Trichophyton rubrum and
`T. mentagraphytes representing the two most common isolates [3-5].
`
`2. Description of onychomycosis
`
`Tinea unguium is the medical term that is used to describe a nail infection caused by
`a dermatophyte, whereas onychomycosis is used more broadly to characterize all
`fungal nail infections. Distal subungual onychomycosis represents the most
`
`10.1517/13543784.16.2.157 © 2007 Informa UK Ltd ISSN 1354-3784
`
`157
`
`FlatWing Ex. 1036, p. 2
`
`

`

`Recent progress on the topical therapy of onychomycosis
`
`common presentation of tinea unguium [6]. Distal subungual
`onychomycosis starts by the microorganism (usually a
`dermatophyte) invading the stratum corneum of the hypo-
`nychium and distal nail bed. Subsequently, the infection
`moves proximally in the nail bed and invades the ventral nail
`surface of the nail plate. The infection is characterized by dis-
`coloration, separation of the nail plate from the nail bed (ony-
`cholysis), accumulation of subungual debris and nail plate
`dystrophy. Proximal subungual onychomycosis is the least
`common variant of onychomycosis. This condition starts by
`fungal invasion of the stratum corneum of the proximal nail
`fold and subsequently of the nail plate. White superficial ony-
`chomycosis occurs when the nail plate is invaded directly by
`the causative organism and is characterized by the presence of
`white, chalky patches on the nail plate. The patches may coa-
`lesce to cover the whole nail plate. The potential end point of
`all forms of onychomycosis is total dystrophic onychomycosis
`and occurs when the entire nail plate and nail bed are invaded
`by the fungus.
`Although onychomycosis is generally not life threatening,
`the disease adversely affects the quality of life of its victims. In
`those cases in which the nail unit is seriously compromised,
`patients can experience pain and discomfort at the site of
`infection. Because of the high incidence of onychomycosis
`and the inadequacy of present treatment modalities, con-
`siderable research efforts have been directed to finding
`improved therapeutic options. This review summarizes the
`recent developments for new treatments of onychomycosis.
`
`3. Challenges to the therapy of onychomycosis
`
`Onychomycosis has proven to be a challenging infection to
`treat, with treatment failures and relapses being common
`occurrences [7-9]. In a study reported in 1998, it was found
`that 22.2% of patients whose toenail onychomycosis had been
`cured by oral therapy experienced a relapse during a 3-year
`follow-up period [10]. For an antifungal drug to be effective, it
`must disseminate throughout the nail unit and kill the patho-
`gen. When a sample taken from the nail bed of an infected
`patient shows a negative culture and negative microscopy, this
`is termed a mycological cure; however, a clinical cure includes
`not only elimination of the fungi from the nail unit but also
`the formation of clear, new nail growth that is absent of dys-
`trophic characteristics. Because of the slow rate of growth of
`toenails (∼ 1 mm/month), evidence of a clinical cure can take
`9 – 12 months. For this reason, drug treatment periods for
`onychomycosis are lengthy and require 3 – 12 months.
`During this treatment period, the infected nails can be
`monitored for growth of new clear nail and for the presence of
`viable dermatophytes.
`The current treatment modalities for onychomycosis
`include mechanical procedures, systemically administered
`antifungals and topical drug therapy. Although infected nails
`can be surgically removed, recurrence of the onychomycosis
`can occur as the new nail grows back and there is no evidence
`
`that the surgical approach is effective in producing a sustained
`disease-free period. In addition, because surgical avulsion is
`quite traumatic, this procedure is rarely used today. An alter-
`native procedure of chemically removing the nail using a urea
`ointment is also not widely used by current practitioners. In
`preference, podiatrists perform periodic trimming and debri-
`dement of affected nails as a means of reducing symptoms,
`with the added hope of minimizing progression by stabilizing
`the disease.
`Whereas mechanical procedures to treat onychomycosis
`only offer marginal benefit to the patient, drug therapies have
`provided some advancement in the attempt to effectively treat
`this disease; however, the overall success in treating ony-
`chomycosis is still far from optimal (as mentioned in
`Section 3) and this almost certainly results from the unique
`anatomical features of the nail unit and its pervasive coloniza-
`tion by dermatophytes during infection. The varied anatomy
`of the nail unit provides an opportunity for the fungal patho-
`gen to establish a deep-seated infection by invading and pro-
`liferating into the nail plate, the nail bed and the surrounding
`tissue. Systemically administered drugs must not only reach
`the nail bed but must also achieve sufficient concentration in
`the nail plate to eliminate dermatophytes at this location. It is
`more likely that systemically administered drugs reach the nail
`plate via the nail matrix, which is a continually proliferating
`epidermal tissue that serves as the origin of new nail growth.
`Access to the nail plate from the newly formed cells in the
`matrix is a slow process due to the very slow growth rate of
`toenails. As a consequence of this slow growth rate, oral ther-
`apy must be continued for some time and this may have the
`inherent disadvantage of causing systemic adverse effects.
`On the other hand, topically administered drugs face even
`more challenges to reach all of the required sites of these
`deep-seated infections. This difficulty in achieving relevant
`fungicidal concentrations throughout the nail unit directly
`relates to the nail plate’s unique properties, its thickness and
`relatively compact structure. The nail plate is a hard yet
`slightly elastic convex structure that consists of ∼ 25 layers of
`dead, keratinized, flattened cells that are tightly bound
`together. The nail plate itself consists of three layers: the dor-
`sal and intermediate layers derived from the matrix, and the
`ventral layer derived from the nail bed [11]. The upper (dorsal)
`layer is a few cell layers thick and consists of hard keratin. It
`constitutes the main barrier to drug diffusion into and
`through the nail plate. The intermediate layer constitutes
`75% of the whole nail thickness and consists of soft keratin.
`Below the intermediate layer is the ventral layer of soft kera-
`tin, a layer that is a few cells thick, that connects to the under-
`lying nail bed in which many pathological changes can occur.
`Thus achieving an effective drug concentration in the ventral
`nail plate and the nail bed is of great importance in the
`treatment of nail diseases.
`Chemically, the nail plate mainly consists of fibrous
`proteins – keratins – which are highly cross-linked with
`disulfide bonds. Coupled with the highly compact structure
`
`158
`
`Expert Opin. Investig. Drugs (2007) 16(2)
`
`FlatWing Ex. 1036, p. 3
`
`

`

`of the keratinized cells in the nail plate, these highly
`cross-linked proteins within the cells present a formidable bar-
`rier to the entry of topically applied agents [12]. In 1 study, the
`concentration of an applied drug across the nail dropped
`∼ 1000 times from the outer surface to the inner surface [13].
`As a result, the drug concentration had presumably not
`reached a therapeutically effective
`level
`in the
`inner
`ventral layer.
`Another factor contributing to the difficulty of topically
`applied antifungal drugs to penetrate the nail plate is the
`apparent mismatch of drug physicochemical properties with
`the biophysical properties of the nail plate [14]. Most existing
`antifungal drugs were originally designed for oral and/or skin
`applications and are consequently fairly lipophilic molecules,
`only sparingly soluble in water and have molecular weights of
`≥ 300 Da. On the other hand, with its dense keratin fabric
`network and a high capacity for flux of water, the nail plate
`has been described as a hydrophilic gel [15-17]. Thus most of
`the known antifungal agents will not find a compatible
`environment in traversing the nail plate.
`
`4. Drugs currently approved for
`onychomycosis in the main markets
`
`4.1 Oral agents
`Systemic drug treatment is currently the most effective
`method of treating onychomycosis. Even so, 20 – 25% of the
`patients fail to respond [18] and recurrence of disease after suc-
`cessful treatment is common. Terbinafine and itraconazole
`(Figure 1) are the two systemic treatments of choice, with ter-
`binafine showing greater efficacy and lower rates of recurrence
`than itraconazole [19].
`Terbinafine, a member of the allylamine family of
`antifungals, has a broad spectrum of activity and exerts fungi-
`cidal activity against most fungal pathogens. This compound
`also inhibits squalene epoxidase, an important enzyme in the
`biosynthesis of
`the
`essential membrane
`component
`ergosterol [20]. Terbinafine is active against dermatophytes,
`Malassezia furfur, Aspergillus spp. and some Candida spp.
`(including Candida parapsilosis). A single dose of terbinafine
`250 mg p.o. administered to humans produces peak plasma
`concentrations of 1 µg/ml within 2 h. It is > 99% protein
`bound and has a half-life of ∼ 36 h. It is administered at a
`dose of 250 mg q.d. with treatment duration of 6 and
`12 weeks for fungal infection of the fingernail and toenail,
`respectively. Using this regimen, 38.2% of toenails showed a
`clinical cure when examined at 48 weeks [21]. Therapeutic lev-
`els of drug persist in the nail for 3 – 6 months after therapy is
`discontinued. Liver toxicity has been reported for terbinafine
`and hepatic function tests are recommended for patients who
`use terbinafine continuously for > 6 weeks. Terbinafine is
`metabolized by CYP enzymes and has been noted to have a
`number of drug interactions [22].
`Itraconazole, which is from the azole class of antifungal
`agents, inhibits lanosterol 14α-demethylase and thus stops
`
`Alley, Baker, Beutner & Plattner
`
`the biosynthesis of ergosterol. It has a broad spectrum of
`activity against species including dermatophytes, Candida
`spp., Aspergillus spp. and M. furfur [23]. Blood levels of
`itraconazole after a single dose of 200 mg administered to
`humans reached a peak level of 0.2 – 0.3 µg/ml after 4 – 5 h.
`It is 99.8% protein bound and has a half-life of 21 h. It is
`administered as either 200 mg q.d. for 12 weeks or 200 mg
`b.i.d. for 7 days, followed by 3 weeks with no treatment and
`repeated for 3 months [22]. Therapeutic levels of itraconazole
`persist in the nail for 3 – 6 weeks after therapy is discontin-
`ued. Itraconazole has also been associated with liver damage
`and liver function tests are required if continuous treatment
`exceeds 1 month. This agent specifically inhibits the CYP3A4
`isoenzyme system and may consequently increase plasma
`concentrations of drugs metabolized by this pathway [22].
`Griseofulvin (Figure 1) is a natural product that was isolated
`from Penicillium griseofulvin in 1939 [24] and has been used
`for treating dermatophytosis since its introduction in 1958.
`Griseofulvin acts by binding to microtubular proteins, which
`results in the inhibition of cell mitosis and the formation of
`multinucleated fungal cells [25]. The drug is administered
`orally and is effective against a wide variety of dermatophytes.
`Griseofulvin has been used in complicated, difficult to treat
`tinea capitis and onychomycosis.
`Fluconazole is an orally active, synthetic, bis-triazole anti-
`fungal agent with activity against a wide range of fungi,
`including most Candida spp. and (as with other azoles) inhib-
`its lanosterol 14α-demethylase. Although fluconazole is not
`approved in the US or Europe for the treatment of ony-
`chomycosis, it is used off-label for this indication. A number
`of clinical trials studying the kinetics and efficacy of
`fluconazole have been reported [22].
`
`4.2 Topical agents
`Treatment of onychomycosis by topical methods has been met
`with limited success for the reasons described in Section 3.
`The two main topical treatments that are used today are
`ciclopirox and amorolfine (Figure 2), both of which are formu-
`lated in lacquers that are painted onto the infected nails. The
`lacquer dries to leave a water-insoluble film on top of the
`infected nail, which subsequently acts like a drug depot releas-
`ing the drug into the nail plate. Ciclopirox is a synthetic com-
`pound and is a member of the hydroxypyridone family of
`antifungal agents. The hydroxypyridone antifungals are active
`against many pathogenic fungi such as dermatophytes,
`M. furfur and Candida spp. Ciclopirox is believed to work by
`inhibiting metal-dependant enzymes by chelating the poly-
`valent cations (Fe3+ or Al3+) [26,27]. Ciclopirox has antifungal,
`antibacterial and anti-inflammatory activities. It is admin-
`istered to the infected nails daily and this treatment regimen
`continues for ≥ 6 months. Ciclopirox persists in the nail for
`14 days after therapy is completed. Clinical response rates for
`the treatment of onychomycosis are in the range of 7 – 10%.
`Amorolfine belongs to the morpholine group of synthetic
`antifungal agents. Its mechanism of action involves the
`
`Expert Opin. Investig. Drugs (2007) 16(2)
`
`159
`
`FlatWing Ex. 1036, p. 4
`
`

`

`Recent progress on the topical therapy of onychomycosis
`
`Cl
`
`Cl
`
`O
`
`O
`
`N
`
`N
`
`O
`
`N
`
`N
`N
`
`O
`
`N
`
`N
`
`N
`
`O
`
`Cl
`
`O
`
`Itraconazole
`
`N
`
`O
`
`O
`
`O
`
`O
`
`Griseofulvin
`
`Terbinafine
`
`Figure 1. Chemical structures of itraconazole, griseofulvin and terbinafine.
`
`N
`
`O
`
`O
`
`N O
`
`H
`
`Ciclopirox
`
`Amorolfine
`
`Figure 2. Chemical structures of ciclopirox and amorolfine.
`
`the ergosterol
`in
`important steps
`two
`inhibition of
`pathway [28]. Amorolfine is fungicidal against C. albicans and
`T. mentagrophytes. It is administered once or twice weekly to
`the infected nails for 6 – 12 months and (as with ciclopirox)
`persists in the nail for 14 days after therapy is completed.
`
`5. New antifungal compounds in development
`for onychomycosis
`
`Due to the treatment limitations described in Section 3 for
`onychomycosis, it is not surprising that significant R&D
`efforts have focused on the discovery of improved therapies.
`In general, these efforts have emphasized eliminating the defi-
`ciencies of currently approved drugs, which include long
`treatment times, concurrent side effects of oral drugs and poor
`efficacy of topical agents. The new treatment modalities that
`are presently in clinical development for onychomycosis are
`listed in Table 1.
`As noted from the entries in Table 1, most of the
`approaches represent re-formulations of known antifungal
`compounds with penetration enhancers in an effort to
`
`increase penetration of the active agent into and through the
`nail plate. The only systemic drug in development is itracon-
`azole (Hyphanox™), which is being developed by Barrier
`Therapeutics as a once-daily oral formulation. With respect
`to topical treatments for onychomycosis, the use of novel
`delivery vehicles and permeation enhancers applied to exist-
`ing classes of antifungals (e.g., azoles or allyl amines) repre-
`sents the main R&D approach that has been pursued over
`the past 10 years. Very little work has been reported on
`approaches focusing on discovering antifungal compounds
`that have intrinsic nail-penetrating properties. S-291-ND is
`one such compound and involves the use of a topical
`NO-generating formulation that can be applied directly to
`the toenail. NO is a highly reactive molecule that has anti-
`microbial activity [29] and may also have intrinsic nail-pene-
`trating capabilities due to is low molecular weight. The
`other novel approach is represented by the boron-containing
`antifungal compound, AN-2690. Now in clinical trials, this
`agent was specifically designed to overcome the nail barrier
`when applied topically so that
`it can achieve high
`concentrations in the nail bed [30].
`
`160
`
`Expert Opin. Investig. Drugs (2007) 16(2)
`
`FlatWing Ex. 1036, p. 5
`
`

`

`Alley, Baker, Beutner & Plattner
`
`Table 1. Onychomycosis treatments in clinical development.
`
`Compound
`
`Abafungin (Abasol™,
`York Pharma)
`
`Company
`
`York Pharma
`
`Topical butenafine gel
`
`Mylan
`
`AN-2690
`
`Anacor
`Pharmaceuticals
`
`Stage
`
`Description
`
`Pre-registration
`(in UK)
`
`Phase III
`
`Phase II
`
`A topical 2-aminothiazole membrane intergity antagonist
`
`Topical formulation of ergosterol synthesis inhibitor butenafine
`
`Topical boron-containing antifungal with inherent nail-penetrating
`characteristics
`
`NM-100060
`
`NexMed/Novartis
`
`Phase II
`
`Topical formulation of terbinafine with penetration enhancer
`
`Itraconazole (Hyphanox™,
`Barrier Therapeutics)
`
`Barrier
`Therapeutics
`
`Organo-gel delivery of
`allylamine antifungals
`
`MediQuest
`Therapeutics
`
`Phase II
`
`Once-daily oral formulation of itraconazole in 200-mg tablets
`
`Phase II
`
`Proprietary organo-gel delivery of naftifine or terbinafine
`
`Topical NO (S-291-ND)
`
`ProStrakan
`
`Phase II (in UK)
`
`Cream formulation of NO precursors that liberate NO on the nail
`
`Onycofitex
`
`Bentley Pharma
`
`Phase I/II
`
`Antifungal nail lacquer formulation of clotrimazole
`
`Transdermal SEPA®
`
`MacroChem
`
`Phase I
`
`Econazole in a nail lacquer with SEPA, a transdermal absorption
`enhancer
`
`6. Discovery and characterization of AN-2690
`
`6.1 Designing a compound to penetrate the nail plate
`Given the many failures and poor efficacy of topical treat-
`ments using known antifungal agents [31], a completely new
`approach was contemplated. Topical antifungal agents are
`applied to the outer surface (dorsal layer) of the nail plate and
`treatment is then dependent on the passive diffusion of the
`drug through this thick, keratin-rich, lipid-containing barrier.
`Several reviews on onychomycosis therapy suggest that topical
`antifungal drugs fail in clinical trials because of the lack of
`penetration of the drug through the nail plate [11,32,33]. To the
`authors’ knowledge, there has been no reported chemical opti-
`mization effort to identify an antifungal agent for delivery
`through a nail plate to treat onychomycosis topically.
`Studies have shown that nail penetration is dependent on
`molecular weight, octanol:water partition coefficient and
`water solubility, with smaller, more polar, water-soluble mol-
`ecules capable of penetrating to a greater extent than larger
`lipophilic molecules [15,34]. In addition to keratin, the nail
`plate contains lipids but (unlike the skin) these are not at such
`high concentrations; furthermore, they seem to be localized in
`the thin upper dorsal and lower ventral layers with a much
`lower concentration throughout the remaining nail plate [17].
`Another consideration was the suggestion in the literature
`that the antifungal potency of certain drugs may be reduced
`in the presence of keratin [35]. This is believed to be due to the
`drug binding to keratin, thus requiring a higher drug
`concentration to compensate for this loss.
`With this knowledge, a medicinal chemistry-based
`project was initiated to develop a small-molecule antifungal
`agent with appropriate physicochemical properties to treat
`onychomycosis topically. The criteria that was used for such
`a molecule included low molecular weight (< 250 Da), polar
`(cLogP < 2.5), good water solubility (> 0.1 mg/ml) and
`
`retention of antifungal activity in the presence of 5%
`keratin powder.
`
`6.2 Structure–activity relationship and chemical
`properties of AN-2690
`Initially, 1-phenyl-substituted benzoxaboroles (1; Figure 3)
`were identified as having broad-spectrum antifungal activity
`with reasonable minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC)
`values [30]. These had a molecular weight of ∼ 200 Da; how-
`ever, these 1-phenylbenzoxaboroles had a high cLogP (> 3.5),
`and were not very water soluble. Initially, 1-phenylbenzoxabo-
`roles were synthesized with hydrophilic substituents appended
`to the 1-phenyl group. Although these modifications
`improved water solubility, they did not reduce the cLogP by
`any significant margin. Furthermore, all of these substitutions
`led to an undesirable gain in molecular weight.
`To lower molecular weight further, the 1-phenyl group
`was
`replaced with
`a 1-hydroxyl
`group
`to
`give
`compound 2. This immediately lowered molecular weight to
`∼ 130 – 180 Da and retained equivalent broad-spectrum
`antifungal activity to the 1-phenyl derivatives. In addition to
`the large reduction in molecular weight, these compounds
`also had lower cLogP values as an aromatic ring had been
`replaced by a hydroxyl group. Furthermore, this modifica-
`tion increased water solubility. Several of these derivatives
`were synthesized and the most potent compounds were
`found to contain a halogen para to the boron. Activity was
`lost by replacing the halogen or by moving the fluoro group
`from the 5-position to another position on the aromatic
`ring. This study resulted in the identification of AN-2690 as
`having the best combination of potency and optimum
`physicochemical properties.
`AN-2690 has a low molecular weight (152 Da), good
`solubility in water (∼ 1 mg/ml) and a cLogP of 1.24 (cLogP
`calculated using CS ChemDraw Ultra 10).
`It has
`
`Expert Opin. Investig. Drugs (2007) 16(2)
`
`161
`
`FlatWing Ex. 1036, p. 6
`
`

`

`Recent progress on the topical therapy of onychomycosis
`
`R2
`
`1
`
`R1
`
`B
`
`O
`
`R1
`
`OH
`B
`
`O
`
`2
`
`OH
`B
`
`O
`
`F
`
`AN-2690
`
`Figure 3. Chemical structures of 1-phenyl substituted benzoxaboroles.
`
`Br
`
`(A)
`
`OH
`
`F
`
`F
`
`3
`
`(B, C)
`
`Br
`
`4
`
`O
`
`O
`
`F
`
`AN-2690
`
`OH
`B
`
`O
`
`Figure 4. The typical synthesis of AN-2690. Conditions: (A) CH3OCH2Cl, i-Pr2NEt and CH2Cl2 at room temperature; (B) n-BuLi,
`(i-PrO)3B and THF at -78ºC to room temperature; and (C) 6N HCl and THF at room temperature [30].
`
`broad-spectrum antifungal activity against dermatophytes,
`yeast, molds and other filamentous fungi with MIC values in
`the
`low microgram per milliliter range. AN-2690
`is
`fungicidal against T. rubrum at 4 to 8 times its MIC.
`AN-2690 is synthesized using the method shown in
`Figure 4. The scale-up development of this compound has
`been relatively simple and it has been synthesized at the 30-kg
`scale using a modification of this scheme.
`The stability of these boron-containing oxaboroles is
`good and comparable with other small non-boron-contain-
`ing organic molecules. They are easy to handle and require
`no specialized equipment. They are purified and analyzed
`using standard methods including recrystallization, column
`chromatography, HPLC and LCMS. They are stable when
`stored at room temperature for prolonged periods and are
`also stable under acidic or basic conditions as well as at
`elevated temperatures.
`To determine whether the activity of AN-2690 was affected
`by the presence of keratin, a MIC study was performed
`against T. rubrum in the presence and absence of 5% pow-
`dered keratin. This showed that the MIC of AN-2690 was
`essentially the same, leading to the conclusion that the activity
`of this compound is not affected by keratin binding.
`
`6.3 Nail-penetration studies
`Nail penetration of AN-2690 and ciclopirox was performed
`by
`the group of Maibach using
`their published
`methodology [36]. In this study, human cadaver finger nails
`were mounted in a one-cell diffusion chamber on top of a cot-
`ton ball wetted with saline to act as the nail bed. AN-2690
`was formulated at 10% w/v in ethanol:propylene glycol (4:1)
`
`as a vehicle and compared with ciclopirox (8% w/w in
`commercial lacquer) [37]. These test articles were applied at a
`dose of 10 µl to the top of the nail plates once daily for
`14 days. At the study end, the top and bottom sections of the
`dosed area of the nail plate were micro-dissected and analyzed
`for test compound. The result of the cotton ball analysis (i.e.,
`the amount of radiolabeled material to penetrate through the
`nail plate and deposit into the cotton ball as determined by
`scintillation counting) is shown in Figure 5. AN-2690 pene-
`trated through the nail plate in remarkably high con-
`centrations and the degree of penetration through the nail
`plate was far superior to ciclopirox. A total of 3 other
`AN-2690 derivative compounds were also studied for nail
`penetration, 1 analog whereby the fluoro group was replaced
`by chloro and 2 1-arylbenzoxaborole derivatives. The chloro
`analog showed almost equal penetration to AN-2690, whereas
`the 1-arylbenzoxaboroles did not show such good penetration
`as could be expected as these congeners had a higher mol-
`ecular weight and were more lipophilic. This result showed
`that the small, polar, water-soluble nature of AN-2690
`matched the requirements to penetrate the nail plate pro-
`viding an antifungal agent with an unprecedented ability to
`penetrate human nails.
`In a final in vitro demonstration of activity, AN-2690,
`ciclopirox and amorolfine were studied in a model of
`infection using the TurChub® cells (MedPharm Ltd;
`Figure 6) [101,102]. In this study, the antifungal agent must
`first pass through full thickness human nail plates to show a
`zone-of-inhibition against the dermatophyte cultured in the
`flask below the nail plate. AN-2690 (10% w/v in ethyl
`acetate:propylene glycol 1:1) was compared with ciclopirox
`
`162
`
`Expert Opin. Investig. Drugs (2007) 16(2)
`
`FlatWing Ex. 1036, p. 7
`
`

`

`Alley, Baker, Beutner & Plattner
`
`human heptocytes (HepG2) is > 1000 µg/ml as measured in
`an MTS cell viability assay. As expected, the difference
`between the bacterial and human AARS enzymes is much
`larger so it is not surprising that the archetypal AARS inhibi-
`tor, mupirocin, is an antibacterial [41]. However, the relatively
`close homology between the fungal and human AARS
`enzymes has not prevented antifungal AARS inhibitors being
`found; for example, even mupirocin, which is used solely as
`an antibacterial topical drug, does have some antifungal activ-
`ity as demonstrated by its efficacy in a guinea-pig T. mentagro-
`[42]. Other examples of more
`phytes ringworm model
`well-known
`specific
`antifungal AARS
`inhibitors
`are
`icofungipen and cispentacin [43-46].
`The AARS enzymes perform the first step in protein syn-
`thesis by attaching their cognate amino acid to either the 2′-
`or 3′-hydroxyl group of the terminal adenosine of tRNA. This
`is performed in a 2-step process: first, the amino acid is acti-
`vated by the attachment of the α-carboxyl group to the
`5′-phosphate of AMP; and second, this activated amino acid
`is transferred to either the 2′- or 3′-hydroxyl group of the
`adenosine on the 3′-terminus of the tRNA with the corre-
`sponding anticodon. The accuracy of this reaction in protein
`synthesis is essential as it is the linchpin in the translation of
`the genetic code into protein, linking the triplet codon to the
`amino acid. Leucyl-tRNA synthetase, as for the AARS for iso-
`leucine, valine, methionine, alanine, lysine, proline and
`phenylalanine, possess additional proofreading mechanisms,
`which can edit either the incorrect amino acid–AMP inter-
`mediate or the incorrect aminoacylated tRNA product, to
`improve the fidelity of tRNA aminoacylation [47]. The homo-
`logous AARS enzymes for leucine, isoleucine and valine pos-
`sess two structurally distinct domains: one domain contains
`the site of aminoacylation and the other domain bears an edit-
`ing site that proofreads the aminoacylated tRNA [48-50]. The
`archetypal AARS
`inhibitor mupirocin
`inhibits
`iso-
`leucyl-tRNA synthetase [51] by binding to the aminoacylation
`active site as an isoleucine adenylate analog [52]. The AARS
`inhibitors cispentacin and icofungipen are thought to act as
`amino acid analogs and (as with mupirocin) probably bind to
`the aminoacylation site. Although AN-2690 inhibits an
`AARS, its mechanism of action is very different to these
`known AARS inhibitors. This was made apparent early in
`genetic studies in Saccharomyces cerevisiae and C. albicans
`when all of the AN-2690 resistance mutations were mapped
`to the editing domain of leucyl-tRNA synthetase. As would
`be expected for a drug that bound to the editing site,
`AN-2690 is a non-competitive inhibitor with respect to leu-
`cine, ATP or tRNA. The oxaborole AN-2690 represents a
`new class of inhibitors that exerts their action on AARS via
`the editing domain. As the editing active site has evolved to
`accommodate a larger repertoire of compounds than the
`aminoacylation active site, the editing site may prove to be a
`better target for designing compounds that inhibit this
`validated drug target.
`
`*
`
`‡
`15
`
`AN2690
`Ciclopirox
`
`3
`
`6
`
`9
`Time (days)
`
`12
`
`2.5
`
`2
`
`1.5
`
`1
`
`0.5
`
`0
`
`cotton ball (mg)
`Amount of compound found in
`
`
`
`Figure 5. Cumulative total amount of AN-2690 and
`ciclopirox found under the nail plate in cotton ball supports
`at each time point following a 14-day, multiple-dose
`nail-penetration study.
`*2.24 mg. ‡0.009 mg.
`
`(8% w/w in commercial lacquer) and amorolfine (5% w/w
`in commercial lacquer). Using 5 – 6 replicates, test articles
`were dosed daily for 5 days at a concentration of 40 µl/cm2.
`The vehicle showed no zone-of-inhibition nor did ciclopirox
`or amorolfine in their com

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket